Whole-Genome Sequences of Two Beak and Feather Disease Viruses in the Endangered Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolor) Subir Sarker,a,c Seyed A. Ghorashi,a,c Jade K. Forwood,b,c Shane R. Raidala,c
Two complete genomes of beak and feather disease virus (BFDV) were characterized from Lathamus discolor, the Australian swift parrot. This is the first report of BFDV complete genome sequences in this host. The completed BFDV genomes consist of 1,984 nucleotides encoding two open reading frames with 99.7% pairwise nucleotide identity. Received 18 September 2013 Accepted 27 October 2013 Published 27 November 2013 Citation Sarker S, Ghorashi SA, Forwood JK, Raidal SR. 2013. Whole-genome sequences of two beak and feather disease viruses in the endangered swift parrot (Lathamus discolor). Genome Announc. 1(6):e00842-13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00842-13. Copyright © 2013 Sarker et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Address correspondence to Subir Sarker,
[email protected].
P
sittacine beak and feather disease (PBFD) is a well-recognized viral threat to a wide variety of psittacine bird species globally, and it typically causes immunosuppression and chronic symmetrical feather loss, as well as beak and claw deformities (1–4). The etiological agent of the disease, beak and feather disease virus (BFDV), composed of a compact circular ambisense singlestranded DNA (ssDNA) genome of approximately 2,000 nucleotides encoding a replicase (Rep) and a single capsid protein (Cap) (2, 5–7), is capable of infecting all Psittaciformes since it has been reported in ⬎60 species of cockatoos and parrots (8–10). In the present study, we report two complete genomes of BFDVs from the endangered swift parrot (Lathamus discolor) (http://www .iucnredlist.org). The BFDV viral genomes were amplified from dried blood spots collected from two wild swift parrots (year of sampling, 2004; GPS location, -43.407043°S 147.322540°E), and the genomic DNA was extracted using established protocols (11–13). To amplify the entire viral genome, a published primer (BFDVP2, 5=-AACCCTACAGACGGCGAG-3=) (11) and designed primers (BFDV-J-R, 5=-TTGGGTCCTCCTTGTAGTGG-3=; BFDVI-F, 5=-GCAAACTGACGGAATTGAACATA-3=; and BFDV-C-R, 5=-CGTCCAACGATGGCATAGT-3=) were used. The reactions for different sets of primers were optimized, and the optimized reaction mixture contained 3 l extracted genomic DNA, 2.5 l of 10⫻ High Fidelity PCR buffer (Invitrogen), 1 l of 25 M each primer, 1 l of 50 mM MgSO4, 4 l of 1.25 mM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP), 1 U Platinum Taq DNA polymerase High Fidelity (Invitrogen), and distilled water (dH2O) added for a final volume of 25 l. The optimized PCR conditions were as follows: 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 57°C for 45 s, and 68°C for 2 min, and finally 68°C for 5 min. The extension time for the second set of primers (BFDV-I-F and BFDV-C-R) was 1.5 min instead of 2 min. The amplified PCR products were TA cloned into pGEM-T vector (Promega) and sequenced at the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF) Ltd. (Brisbane, Australia). The sequence contigs were assembled,
November/December 2013 Volume 1 Issue 6 e00842-13
and the entire BFDV genomes were constructed using the Geneious software. Two newly amplified BFDV genomes (GenBank accession no. KF673335 and KF673336), along with all other BFDV genome sequences from GenBank, were aligned using the MAFFT L-INS-i algorithm (14); they exhibit 99.7% pairwise nucleotide identity with each other and ⬎87.0% nucleotide sequence homology with other BFDV genomes. While habitat loss was considered to be the major threat to swift parrots, the spread of infectious diseases, especially PBFD, was also highlighted as a key threat (12). Therefore, the complete genome sequences of BFDVs for the first time may provide novel insights into the viral evolutionary history in this host species. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The complete genome sequences of the two BFDVs were deposited at GenBank under accession no. KF673335 and KF673336. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This research was supported by the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Projects funding scheme (grant no. DP1095408).
REFERENCES 1. Pass DA, Perry RA. 1984. The pathology of psittacine beak and feather disease. Aust. Vet. J. 61:69 –74. 2. Ritchie BW, Niagro FD, Lukert PD, Steffens WL, III, Latimer KS. 1989. Characterization of a new virus from cockatoos with psittacine beak and feather disease. Virology 171:83– 88. 3. Ritchie BW, Niagro FD, Latimer KS, Lukert PD, Steffens WL, Rakich PM, Pritchard N. 1990. Ultrastructural, protein composition, and antigenic comparison of psittacine beak and feather disease virus purified from four genera of psittacine birds. J. Wildl. Dis. 26:196 –203. 4. Raidal SR, McElnea CL, Cross GM. 1993. Seroprevalence of psittacine beak and feather disease in wild psittacine birds in New South Wales. Aust. Vet. J. 70:137–139. 5. Heath L, Martin DP, Warburton L, Perrin M, Horsfield W, Kingsley C, Rybicki EP, Williamson AL. 2004. Evidence of unique genotypes of beak and feather disease virus in southern Africa. J. Virol. 78:9277–9284. 6. Mankertz A, Mankertz J, Wolf K, Buhk HJ. 1998. Identification of a protein essential for replication of porcine circovirus. J. Gen. Virol. 79(Pt 2):381–384.
Genome Announcements
genomea.asm.org 1
Downloaded from http://genomea.asm.org/ on July 6, 2015 by CALIFORNIA STATE UNIV FRESNO
School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australiaa; School of Biomedical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australiab; Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australiac
Sarker et al.
2 genomea.asm.org
merase chain reaction for the detection of psittacine beak and feather disease virus. Vet. Microbiol. 68:141–148. 12. Khalesi B, Bonne N, Stewart M, Sharp M, Raidal S. 2005. A comparison of haemagglutination, haemagglutination inhibition and PCR for the detection of psittacine beak and feather disease virus infection and a comparison of isolates obtained from loriids. J. Gen. Virol. 86: 3039 –3046. 13. Bonne N, Clark P, Shearer P, Raidal S. 2008. Elimination of falsepositive polymerase chain reaction results resulting from hole punch carryover contamination. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 20:60 – 63. 14. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:3059 –3066.
Genome Announcements
November/December 2013 Volume 1 Issue 6 e00842-13
Downloaded from http://genomea.asm.org/ on July 6, 2015 by CALIFORNIA STATE UNIV FRESNO
7. Bassami MR, Berryman D, Wilcox GE, Raidal SR. 1998. Psittacine beak and feather disease virus nucleotide sequence analysis and its relationship to porcine circovirus, plant circoviruses, and chicken anaemia virus. Virology 249:453– 459. 8. Bassami MR, Ypelaar I, Berryman D, Wilcox GE, Raidal SR. 2001. Genetic diversity of beak and feather disease virus detected in psittacine species in Australia. Virology 279:392– 400. 9. Ritchie PA, Anderson IL, Lambert DM. 2003. Evidence for specificity of psittacine beak and feather disease viruses among avian hosts. Virology 306:109 –115. 10. Todd D. 2004. Avian circovirus diseases: lessons for the study of PMWS. Vet. Microbiol. 98:169 –174. 11. Ypelaar I, Bassami MR, Wilcox GE, Raidal SR. 1999. A universal poly-