Clinical Research

Volumetric Pulp Changes after Orthodontic Treatment Determined by Cone-beam Computed Tomography Shivanand Venkatesh, BDS, MDS, MOrth RCS (Edinburgh),* Shreya Ajmera, BDS, MDS,† and Sanjay V. Ganeshkar, BDS, MDS, MDO RCPS (Glasgow)† Abstract Introduction: The purpose of this study was to observe and evaluate 3-dimensional pulp cavity changes during orthodontic treatment. Methods: Eighty-seven patients formed the study sample and were divided into an experimental group (48 patients) and a control group (39 patients). Cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) records were obtained before the start of the treatment (T0) and after space closure for the experimental group, whereas for the control group CBCT images were obtained approximately 17–18 months (T1) after obtaining the first image (T0). CBCT data were reconstructed with surface and volume rendering software (Mimics; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium), and the volumetric images were modified to display the teeth from various orientations. Six anterior teeth were segmented and their pulps isolated. Paired t test was used to check for statistical significance. Results: The difference in the pulp volume was statistically significant at P < .05 for all the anterior teeth in the experimental group and at P < .05 for the right canine, P < .05 for the right and left lateral incisors, and P < .05 for the left central in the control group. Conclusions: Orthodontic treatment in the experimental group produced a significant decrease in the size of the pulp, which was statistically significant. (J Endod 2014;-:1–6)

Key Words Cone-beam computed tomography, mimics, pulp cavity, tertiary dentin

From the *Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, MS Ramaiah Dental College and Hospital, MSR Nagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India; and †Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, SDM College of Dental Sciences, Sattur, Dharwad, Karnataka, India. Address requests for reprints to Dr Shivanand Venkatesh, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, MS Ramaiah Dental College and Hospital, MSR Nagar, Bangalore, Karnataka 560054, India. E-mail address: shivanand85@ gmail.com 0099-2399/$ - see front matter Copyright ª 2014 American Association of Endodontists. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.07.029

A

n injury to the teeth might affect the pulp or the periodontium. If the injury is not severe, the pulp recovers from it by tertiary dentin deposition, whereas if the periodontium is injured, it results in surface resorption (1, 2). Orthodontic therapy involves the application of forces on teeth in order to obtain desired tooth movement. Forces within the physiologic limits bring about a physiologic response in the teeth and the periodontium, but orthodontic treatment can cause adverse tissue reactions as well. One of the consequences of such adverse reactions is external apical root resorption (EARR). The causes for EARR can be multifactorial, such as genetic and systemic factors, orthodontic force magnitude, tooth movement type, sex, duration, and type of force (3, 4), but most of the literature is focused on the effect of orthodontic force and tooth movement on EARR (5–9). Orthodontic force, which is considered a so-called controlled trauma (10), could produce an injury to the pulp because a lack of collateral circulation in the pulp makes it one of the most sensitive tissues in the body. Histologic studies evaluating the changes in the pulp after orthodontic tooth movement suggest the etiology to be disruption of the odontoblastic layer, compromise of pulpal blood flow, formation of secondary dentin, and vacuolization of pulpal tissue (11–15). Recent studies suggest an increase in angiogenic growth factors in the pulp of orthodontically moved teeth (16). Studies using radiorespirometric techniques suggest depression of the respiration rate of the pulp in the tooth subjected to orthodontic forces (17, 18). Popp et al (10) compared the pulp size radiographically of individuals who had undergone orthodontic treatment with untreated individuals and found a decrease in pulp cavity size in both groups. These studies implicate that orthodontic treatment might have iatrogenic effects on the long-term vitality of teeth. Traditionally, pulp changes have been detected through periapical radiographs, pulp vitality tests, histologic sections, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). However, magnification errors and inaccurate reiterative abilities have made the usage of these aforementioned modalities questionable. Also, the area of pulp cavity measured on conventional radiographs gives the size in 2 dimensions, which is not reliable because the pulp cavity is a 3-dimensional (3D) structure. Although histologic studies have shown accuracy in determining the orthodontically induced changes in the pulp, routine clinical application of the histologic evaluation requires extraction of the tooth, and, hence, its clinical application during and after orthodontic treatment is ambiguous. In recent years, cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging has revolutionized the way diagnosis and treatment planning is made in orthodontics (19–22). CBCT imaging has also been used for the detection of EARR in all 3 planes. Recently, various studies have been performed to evaluate the change in root volume caused by EARR after orthodontic treatment (23, 24). Until now, no prospective long-term studies have appeared in the literature reporting on the effect of orthodontic treatment on the volume of pulpal tissues. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the volumetric change of pulp tissue during orthodontic therapy using CBCT imaging.

Materials and Methods CBCT images of 48 patients (21 males and 27 females, mean age = 18.1 years) who were undergoing orthodontic treatment (experimental group) were selected from the database of the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (after getting

JOE — Volume -, Number -, - 2014

Volumetric Pulp Changes

1

Clinical Research approval from the institutional review board and ethical committee and informed consent from patients or parents for minor patients). The test subjects had proclination with mild to moderate crowding in the anterior teeth. The control subjects consisting of 39 patients (23 females and 16 males, mean age = 17.5 years) were compared with the experimental group and were selected from the institutional database records from the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology and an adjacent diagnostic facility. The records were matched according to age and malocclusion type. Patients in the experimental group were treated with a preadjusted edgewise appliance with McLaughlin Bennett Trevisi (MBT) prescription (0.022-in. Gemini Series Bracket; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA). The experimental group was treated by extraction therapy, which required the extraction of all first premolars. Leveling and alignment were completed with 0.016/0.018-in. superelastic nickeltitanium or stainless steel wires. Space closure was performed using 0.019  0.025-in. stainless steel archwire with sliding mechanics. A controlled force of 150 g was applied using NiTi coil springs for en masse retraction of the anterior teeth. Patients with a previous history of orthodontic treatment, traumatic injuries, or restorations were excluded from both the experimental and control groups. CBCT images were taken of the 6 maxillary anterior teeth before the start of treatment (T0) and after completion of space closure

(T1) for the experimental group, whereas for the control group CBCT images were obtained approximately 17–18 months (T1[in order to match the average time duration taken for space closure in the experimental group]) after obtaining the first image (T0). All the CBCT images were generated using the Kodak 9000 3D (Kodak Carestream Health, Trophy, France). Specifications for rendering images were as follows: exposure at 70 kVp, 10 milliamperage, and exposure time of 10.8 seconds. The DICOM files were imported into computed tomographic and CBCT diagnosis and treatment planning software (Mimics Version 14 on Windows; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium), which allows soft and hard tissue volume calculations. Separation and segmentation of the involved teeth were automatically performed by setting a grayscale threshold referring to the grayscale of the different tooth and surrounding tissue components and was manually checked and corrected whenever necessary. The detailed procedure is as follows. To segment the selected tooth, a mask is created, and an optimal separating grayscale threshold is chosen on axial images showing the tooth in bone. Threshold values were set individually for each patient. The same Hounsfield Units (HU) was used for the segmentation of each patient’s before and after records (Fig. 1). The mask is cropped in 3 axes to limit it to the closest region of the selected tooth, and a 3D image (3D) is calculated. A 3D calculation of the mask assembling

Figure 1. Thresholding of tissues according to the predefined density values (Hounsfield units) and segmentation of 6 anterior teeth on Mimics software.

2

Venkatesh et al.

JOE — Volume -, Number -, - 2014

Clinical Research

Figure 2. An image showing pulp tissue being segmented in all 3 planes and derivation of 3D images of the pulp cavities of 6 anterior teeth.

all adapted slices generates an image on which the program can calculate the tooth volume. At the inner side of the calculated image, free space is available corresponding with the pulp chamber. A second mask is created for the pulp after selecting the grayscale for the pulp tissue. A 3D image of

the pulp cavity is then created (Fig. 2). A 3D calculation of the pulp cavity mask allows for a calculation of the pulp volume (Fig. 3). This procedure is repeated for all the anterior teeth, and the volumes are subsequently calculated for the experimental group as well as the control group.

Figure 3. 3D volume calculation in mm3 of the pulp cavity mask.

JOE — Volume -, Number -, - 2014

Volumetric Pulp Changes

3

Clinical Research Statistical Analysis The statistics was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (SPSS 15.0; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). The means, standard deviations, and minimum and maximum values were calculated for all teeth. The pulp cavity volume values were tested with a paired samples t test. The level of statistical significance was established at P < .05.

Results Descriptive statistics and a comparison of pulp volumes at T0 and T1 are given in Table 1 and Figure 4. According to the results of the paired samples t test, statistically significant differences were found between T0 and T1 pulp cavity volumes in both the control and experimental groups although the right central and left canine did not show any statistically significant reduction in the pulp cavity volume for the control group. The difference was statistically significant at P < .05 for all the anterior teeth in the experimental group and at P < .05 for the right canine, P < .05 for the right and left lateral incisors, and P < .05 for the left central in the control group. For the experimental group, the highest mean volume loss recorded was for the left lateral incisor (3.86 mm3) and the least for the right central incisor (3.04 mm3).

Discussion It is a well-known fact that orthodontic force not only affects the periodontium but also pulp tissue. The pulp-dentin complex responds to the insult depending on the type of injury and by the deposition of tertiary dentin. There are 3 types of dentin in the human tooth: primary dentin, secondary dentin, and tertiary dentin. Primary dentin is formed by odontoblasts until tooth development, whereas secondary dentin is laid throughout life after the apical foramen is formed. Thus, both primary and secondary dentin have a similar tubular structure and are secreted by the same odontoblasts. The tertiary dentin can be subclassified as reactionary and reparative dentin, which is laid only in specific TABLE 1. Descriptive Statistics and Statistical Comparison of T0 and T1 Pulp Volumes (mm3) Group Control Right canine T0 Right canine T1 Right lateral T0 Right lateral T1 Right central T0 Right central T1 Left central T0 Left central T1 Left lateral T0 Left lateral T1 Left canine T0 Left canine T1 Experimental Right canine T0 Right canine T1 Right lateral T0 Right lateral T1 Right central T0 Right central T1 Left central T0 Left central T1 Left lateral T0 Left lateral T1 Left canine T0 Left canine T1

4

Venkatesh et al.

n

Mean

Standard deviation

39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39

52.8079 52.3321 38.181 37.9451 45.6133 45.5092 45.2031 45.0938 39.0133 38.9197 52.27 52.1721

7.19658 7.18084 8.58358 8.53019 8.46619 8.40392 7.74101 7.77561 9.04577 9.05751 6.7537 6.83303

48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48

50.4335 46.8619 38.1212 34.4142 45.2704 42.226 45.4763 42.0033 38.6969 34.8302 51.0187 47.6017

9.11026 9.5036 9.5334 9.86898 9.44442 9.6326 9.57655 9.86472 9.25479 9.50749 9.20125 9.43542

P value

Volumetric pulp changes after orthodontic treatment determined by cone-beam computed tomography.

The purpose of this study was to observe and evaluate 3-dimensional pulp cavity changes during orthodontic treatment...
2MB Sizes 1 Downloads 10 Views