European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Advance Access published April 12, 2015

EDITORIAL COMMENT

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (2015) 1–2 doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezv130

Unilateral lung injury after minimally invasive cardiac surgery: more questions than answers Cornelius Keyla,* and Matthias Siepeb a b

Department of Anesthesiology, Heart Center Freiburg University, Bad Krozingen, Germany Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center Freiburg University, Bad Krozingen, Germany

* Corresponding author. Department of Anesthesiology, Heart Center Freiburg University, Suedring 15, 79189 Bad Krozingen, Germany. Tel: +49-7633-402-2650; fax: +49-7633-402-2659; e-mail: [email protected] (C. Keyl).

Keywords: Pulmonary oedema • Minimally invasive cardiac surgery • Cardiopulmonary bypass • Valve surgery

Pulmonary dysfunction has been a much-noticed postoperative complication since the early days of cardiac surgery. The increasing popularity of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has again attracted attention to the interaction between the cardiac surgical procedure and the lung. Recently, several authors reported on patient cohorts who developed unilateral lung injury after MICS, requiring extracorporeal circulation and unilateral lung collapse [1–3]. The frequency of unilateral lung injury, which manifests clinically as lung oedema, was reported to be between 2.1 and 25%. The varying incidence may be due to different diagnostic criteria, as well as to differences in patient cohorts and perioperative management. Obviously, there is a similarity between unilateral lung injury after MICS and re-expansion pulmonary oedema. Lung collapse has been shown to be associated with the sequestration of polymorphonuclear leucocytes. Respiratory burst and inflammatory activity are triggered when oxygen is supplied during re-expansion (and concomitant reperfusion) of the lung [4]. One may hypothesize that this inflammatory response is enhanced by multiple factors during cardiac surgery. The authors of the above-mentioned studies tried to identify factors that were associated with the development of unilateral lung injury after MICS. However, the rare occurrence of this event, especially in the work of Irisawa et al. [1], is a limiting factor with respect to the validity of the results of multivariate analysis. Although it is beyond the scope of this comment to discuss the various conditions, that might be involved in the development of unilateral lung injury after MICS, some aspects should be mentioned. The inflammatory response to re-expansion and reperfusion may be aggravated by the generalized inflammatory response generated by cardiopulmonary bypass. This mechanism may explain the association between prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (including prolonged lung collapse) and unilateral lung injury [1, 2]. In addition, ischaemia of the lung might be worsened by the restriction of bronchial artery blood flow during extracorporeal circulation [5]. Mechanical factors may promote the formation of lung oedema: an increase in pulmonary capillary pressure generates an increase in fluid flux into the interstitium of the lung in the presence of increased microvascular permeability [6].

Another point that should be taken into consideration is the impact of ventilatory management on pulmonary function after re-expansion of the lung. The application of lung protective ventilation, thus avoiding recurrent alveolar collapse and reopening, as well as overinflation of the lung, has been shown to be related to an improved pulmonary function and decreased concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and plasma of patients undergoing cardiac and non-cardiac surgery [7, 8]. Lung damage may be aggravated by hyperoxic conditions, which are known to increase pulmonary reperfusion injury [9]. It is not known, to which extent these factors might influence the generation of unilateral lung injury after MICS. Other factors, such as comorbidities, intraoperative blood transfusion or genetic polymorphism, can affect the inflammatory response. Likewise, the modulation of the inflammatory response by glucocorticoids may have impact on the incidence of postoperative lung injury. A recent study demonstrated a beneficial effect of preoperative corticoid treatment on lung injury after cardiac surgery [10]; however, further details, such as the optimal dose required, remain to be evaluated. Studies like that of Irisawa et al. [1] draw attention to phenomena, which are underappreciated up to now. Questions as to which of the various factors known to be related to lung injury might be a risk factor, and which factors might protect against the development of unilateral lung damage after MICS, remain to be evaluated.

REFERENCES [1] Irisawa Y, Hiraoka A, Totsugawa T, Chikazawa G, Nakajima K, Hidenori Y et al. Re-expansion pulmonary edema after minimally invasive cardiac surgery with right mini-thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015. [2] Tutschka MP, Bainbridge D, Chu MW, Kiaii B, Jones PM. Unilateral postoperative pulmonary edema after minimally invasive cardiac surgical procedures: a case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;99:115–22. [3] Keyl C, Staier K, Pingpoh C, Pache G, Thoma M, Günkel L et al. Unilateral pulmonary oedema after minimally invasive cardiac surgery via right anterolateral minithoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu312.

© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

ADULT CARDIAC

Cite this article as: Keyl C, Siepe M. Unilateral lung injury after minimally invasive cardiac surgery: more questions than answers. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezv130.

2

C. Keyl and M. Siepe / European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

[4] Minamiya Y, Saito H, Takahashi N, Kawai H, Ito M, Hosono Y et al. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes are activated during atelectasis before lung re-expansion in rat. Shock 2008;30:81–6. [5] Schlensak C, Doenst T, Preusser S, Wunderlich M, Kleinschmidt M, Beyersdorf F. Bronchial artery perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass does not prevent ischemia of the lung in piglets: assessment of bronchial artery blood flow with fluorescent microspheres. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:326–31. [6] Sue RD, Matthay MA, Ware LB. Hydrostatic mechanisms may contribute to the pathogenesis of human re-expansion pulmonary edema. Intensive Care Med 2004;30:1921–6. [7] Zupancich E, Paparella D, Turani F, Munch C, Rossi A, Massaccesi S et al. Mechanical ventilation affects inflammatory mediators in patients

undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:378–83. [8] Hemmes SN, Serpa Neto A, Schultz MJ. Intraoperative ventilatory strategies to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications: a meta-analysis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2013;26:126–33. [9] Ellman PI, Alvis JS, Tache-Leon C, Singh R, Reece TB, Kern JA et al. Hyperoxic ventilation exacerbates lung reperfusion injury. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:1440. [10] Dieleman JM, Nierich AP, Rosseel PM, van der Maaten JM, Hofland J, Diephuis JC et al. Intraoperative high-dose dexamethasone for cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2012;308: 1761–7.

Unilateral lung injury after minimally invasive cardiac surgery: more questions than answers.

Unilateral lung injury after minimally invasive cardiac surgery: more questions than answers. - PDF Download Free
36KB Sizes 0 Downloads 9 Views