AIDS Behav DOI 10.1007/s10461-015-1020-3

ORIGINAL PAPER

Trends in the HIV Epidemic Among African American Men Who Have Sex with Men, San Francisco, 2004–2011 V. Fuqua • H. Scott • S. Scheer • J. Hecht J. M. Snowden • H. Fisher Raymond



Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Abstract African American men who have sex with men have been disproportionately affected by the HIV epidemic in the United States and remain to this day one of the groups with highest HIV prevalence and incidence. Our goal was to clarify the current state of HIV risk, sexual behaviors, and structural/network–network level factors that affect black MSM’s population risk of HIV, enabling the formulation of targeted and up-to-date public health messages/campaigns directed at this vulnerable population. Our approach maximized the use of local data through a process of synthesis and triangulation of multiple independent and overlapping sources of information that are sometimes separately published and often not examined side-by-side. Among African American MSM, we observed stable HIV incidence despite increases in reported individual risk behavior and STDs. An increasing proportion of African American MSM are reporting HIV testing in the past 6 months and seroadaptive behaviors, which may play a role in this observed decline in HIV among MSM in San Francisco, California. Our analysis suggests

V. Fuqua  H. Scott  S. Scheer  H. F. Raymond (&) San Francisco Department of Public Health, 25 Van Ness, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94102, USA e-mail: [email protected] J. Hecht San Francisco AIDS Foundation, San Francisco, CA, USA J. M. Snowden Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA H. F. Raymond Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, USA

that currently the HIV epidemic is stable among African American MSM in San Francisco. However, we suggest that the observed stability is due to factors prohibiting expansion of new infections rather than decreasing risks for HIV infection among African American MSM. Keywords HIV prevalence  HIV incidence  Population size  Men who have sex with men, population size estimation  African American

Introduction African American men who have sex with men have been disproportionately affected by the HIV epidemic in the United States and remain to this day one of the groups with highest HIV prevalence and incidence. These disparities exist despite similar or lower reported individual HIV risk behaviors compared to White MSM, indicating that structural (i.e., stigma, homophobia, racism) and social (i.e., sexual networks) factors are driving these disparities [1]. This is true also for African American MSM in San Francisco where African American MSM comprise 6 % of the MSM population but account for 8 % of the MSM HIV cases in the city [2]. However, some recent findings from San Francisco have suggested that HIV prevalence among African American MSM has declined to a level consistent with that among White and Latino MSM [3]. While seemingly a positive development, it is unclear what may be driving this decline in HIV prevalence. Possible explanations include increases in mortality, emigration, changes in risk behaviors and/or changes in other structural and social factors related to HIV acquisition [4, 5]. To help begin to understand the epidemiology of HIV among African American MSM we synthesized the available data

123

AIDS Behav

on this population, assessing a number of HIV indicators, programmatic responses and community factors in order to better understand the current direction of the epidemic among this highly affected population. Our goal was to clarify the current state of HIV risk, sexual behaviors, and structural/network–network level factors that affect black MSM’s population risk of HIV, enabling the formulation of targeted and up-to-date public health messages/campaigns directed at this vulnerable population.

Methods Tracking the HIV epidemic and response among specific population requires data on HIV prevalence, HIV incidence, risk behaviors, programmatic data (i.e. data collected during the routine delivery of HIV prevention services) and the size of the population of interest. Unfortunately, data for these indicators are rarely if ever found in one dataset or originating from one study and are often not representative individually, making it difficult to understand the direction of the epidemic, or guide the programmatic decisions to respond appropriately to the epidemic. One solution for this problem is to maximize the use of local data through a process of synthesis and triangulation of multiple independent and overlapping sources of information that are sometimes separately published and often not examined side-by-side [6]. This approach, described in World Health Organization guidelines [7], has been used by San Francisco Department of Public Health for arriving at estimates of HIV prevalence and incidence used to guide the allocation of resources, set program targets, and help evaluate reach and impact [8].

short behavioral risk assessment (BRA) [11] and from the Black Brothers Esteem (BBE) program which is for African American gay, bisexual, and same gender loving men in San Francisco, California. Conducted by trained outreach volunteers the BRA is administered to approximately 1500–2000 MSM each year at venues, primarily in the Castro and South of Market areas of San Francisco where MSM congregate. BBE is a group-level HIV prevention intervention for African American men to gather and to gain support from each other, with the goal of providing education, skills and enhanced social connections to reduce sexual risk-taking. In addition to measures of HIV prevalence (via laboratory based HIV testing in community based samples) and HIV incidence, we also focused our analysis on structural factors (measures of service delivery), individual factors such as ‘‘drivers of HIV infection’’, sexual risk taking, in particular trends in serosorting/seroadaptive behaviors [12] and substance use. Drivers of HIV infection are behaviors or conditions that have an association with HIV infection and are present in at least 10 % of a population. The main drivers among MSM in San Francisco are multiple partners, methamphetamine use, STDs and binge alcohol use. These drivers are used in San Francisco HIV prevention planning (HIV Plan) and as such we limited our analyses to these indicators [14]. Lastly, we examined sexual mixing among MSM in San Francisco [3, 13] and HIV viral load suppression among MSM in San Francisco as indicators of social factors and health care access that may lead to more or fewer new HIV infections. Many of the specific calculations for the indicators are shown in the tables to ease understanding of how results were derived.

Data Sources

Results

Data sources used in the analysis include: National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS), a routine bio-behavioral survey conducted by sampling from all MSM in San Francisco every 3 years [9], Black Men Testing (BMT), an HIV testing pilot program among African American MSM [10], HIV/AIDS case reporting data, programmatic data from community based organizations and municipally funded HIV testing sites. NHBS is the CDC’s de facto gold standard to sample MSM in 20 cities in the United States. NHBS samples from any type of venue where MSM can be found including bars, clubs, cafes, gyms, religious organizations, parks, street locations and social groups. A number of these indicators have been published separately while others were collected or calculated specifically for this synthesis. San Francisco AIDS Foundation programs contributed programmatic data from STOP AIDS Project which conducts street based outreach among MSM and administers a

Population Size

123

Overall, the population size of MSM in San Francisco appears to be increasing from 2004 to 2011 by approximately 3000 men (Table 1). These estimates are from published data from San Francisco. In brief, population size estimates are derived using multiple methods including service multipliers and a component method. Details can be found elsewhere. [8, 19]. Using the proportion of MSM who reported being African American in NHBS we estimate that there were 3989, 4820 and 4055 African American MSM in 2004, 2008 and 2011, respectively. Using HIV prevalence from NHBS to determine how many HIV infected African American MSM live in San Francisco we estimated 1316, 1769 and 811 HIV infected African American MSM in 2004, 2008 and 2011. Finally, subtracting HIV infected from the total resulted in 2673,

AIDS Behav Table 1 Population size(s), African American MSM, San Francisco, 2004–2011 Indicator

2004

2008

2011

Calculation

Source

Overall MSM Population Size

63,577

66,032

66,487

na

NHBSa

% MSM that are African American

6.0

7.3

6.1

na

NHBSb

African American MSM Pop

3989

4820

4055

All MSM 9 % African American MSM in NHBS

NHBS

# HIV positive

1316

1769

811

African American MSM Population size 9 % African American MSM HIV positive

NHBSc

# HIV negative

2673

3051

3244

African American MSM pop size-# HIV positive

NHBS

a

Refs. [8, 19] 2008 mean of 2004 and 2011

b

Ref. [8]

c

Ref. [3]

Table 2 HIV Indicators among African American MSM, San Francisco, 2004–2011 Indicator

2004

% HIV infected

33

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

36.7

% HIV infected

2011

Calculation

Source

20

# HIV infections/ sample size

NHBS

na

BMT Case reporting/ NHBS NHBS

24

% HIV infected

27.8

24.1

30.0

# Cases/pop size

% Unrecognized infection

57.1

30.8

20

# Unrecognized/# HIV positive

% Unrecognized infection

23

# New HIV cases reported

35

HIV incidence %

1.3

22

24

37

39

31

Positivity rate (% positive)

5.2

3.9

4.2

3.6

2.4

2

# Deaths

28

38

28

30

25

# Living cases

1108

1118

1138

1143

1161

% HIV infected

27.8

# Unrecognized/# HIV positive 36

25

na

Case Reporting

1.0

(# New cases/HIV negative population size)

NHBS/Pop size/ Case Reporting

2

4.2

#HIV positive test/# total tests

CHEP supported HIV testing

27

19

18

na

Case Reporting

1186

1198

1217

na

Case Reporting

30.0

(# Reported cases/ population size)

NHBS/Case reporting

1.3

24.1

BMT

NHBS National HIV Behavioral Surveillance, Case Reporting mandated disease reporting, BMT Black Men Testing, Pop Size population size estimate, CHEP Community Health Equity and Promotion

3051 and 3244 HIV uninfected African American MSM in 2004, 2008 and 2011, respectively. HIV Prevalence, Unrecognized HIV Infection and HIV Incidence HIV prevalence appears to have declined from 2004 to 2011 from data from three samples of MSM (33 % in 2004 to 20 % in 2011) and one sample of African American MSM only (24 % in 2009). Using reported HIV cases and population size we estimated an HIV prevalence that appears stable around 30 % across the study period (HIV cases/population size = HIV prevalence) (Table 2). In terms of HIV incidence, we accessed or calculated HIV incidence estimates using three sources of information: population size of HIV negative African American

MSM derived from NHBS HIV-negative proportion, total African American MSM population size, and the number of new cases reported per year in mandated disease reporting. The number of newly reported cases remained mostly stable (mean 31 cases per year SD 6.6), the positivity rate among HIV testers at city funded clinics remained mostly stable (mean 3.4 % SD 1.2) and our calculated HIV incidence has remained stable (mean 1.2 % SD 0.6). Seroadaptive Behavior Among HIV uninfected African American MSM, the proportion of men reporting having sex but no anal sex in the past 6 months has declined from 4.3 % to 0 % from 2004 to 2011 and the proportion reporting using condoms 100 %

123

AIDS Behav Table 3 Seroadaptive strategies among HIV negative African American MSM, San Francisco, 2004–2011 Indicator

2004

2008

2011

% No Sex

22.6

22.6

19.2

% Sex but no anal sex

4.3

3.2

0

% Anal sex with condom only

47.3

38.7

26.9

% Any serosorting

22.5

35.5

46.2

% No seroadaptive strategy

3.2

0

7.7

Source: NHBS

of the time during anal sex has declined from 47.3 % in 2004 to 26.9 % in 2011. Meanwhile, the proportion of HIV uninfected African American MSM who report engaging in any seroadaptive behavior has increased from 22.5 to 46.2 % in the same period while the proportion who report no seroadaptive strategy has increased from 3.2 to 4.7 % (Table 3).

have not tested over the 2004–2011 period. The number of HIV tests in community settings have remained stable and the positivity rate among those tested has also remained stable at about 4–5 % from 2004 to 2011 (Table 5). Sexual Mixing Newman’s coefficient, which in this analysis was used to measure sexual mixing in and across racial groups, suggests that both MSM overall and African American MSM are mixing more readily across racial groups in 2011 compared to 2004 [3, 15]. In 2004, the coefficient was 0.4 for African American MSM while in 2011 the coefficient was 0.1, suggesting increased dissortative sexual mixing in this group. While HIV prevalence has remained stable among all MSM (24 % in 2004 to 23 % in 2011), the proportion of HIV infected MSM who are virally suppressed has increased steadily from 32 % in 2004 to 59 % in 2011. Viral suppression data are from the mandatory HIV case reporting system (Table 6).

HIV Risk Behaviors Discussion Individual Risk Factors (‘‘Drivers’’) for HIV Infection We accessed four data sources that had information on select ‘‘drivers’’ of HIV infection. Overall, among African American MSM, methamphetamine use has declined from 13 % reporting any use in 2004 to 9.7 % in both 2010 and 2011 while cocaine use and crack use appear to be stable in the study period (Table 4). HIV Testing A majority of HIV uninfected African American MSM have tested in the past 6 months however almost 40 % Table 4 HIV risk indicators, African American MSM, San Francisco, 2004–2011

Among African American MSM, we observed stable HIV incidence despite increases in reported individual risk behavior and STDs. An increasing proportion of African American MSM are reporting HIV testing in the past 6 months and seroadaptive behaviors, which may play a role in this observed decline in HIV among MSM in San Francisco, California. Seroadaptation has sometimes been characterized as fraught with potential risks of HIV transmission especially for African-American men compared to MSM of other races [16]. One such potential risk is wrongly classifying a sexual partner as the same serostatus, especially when high

Indicator

2004

% any MA use past 12 months

13

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

18 9.7

21

27 11.3

11.3

5.4

NHBS National HIV Behavioral Surveillance, MA Methamphetamine, SAP Stop AIDS Project, SFAF San Francisco AIDS Foundation, BMT Black Men Testing, STD San Francisco Municipal STD Control, UAI unprotected anal intercourse, URAI unprotected receptive anal intercourse

123

% URAI past 6 months % BBE UAI % 2 ? partners past 6 months

4.8 10.9

14.3 61

73.3

48 62.2

% 2 ? partners past 6 months

55

51

NHBS NHBS SAP

20.8

NHBS

40 79.3

SFAF NHBS

66.0

% 2 ? partners past 6 months

NHBS

SAP 9.7

% crack past 6 month

Source

SAP 25

% cocaine use past 6 months % any crack use past 12 months

2011 9.7

% MA use past 6 months % any cocaine use past 12 months

2010

BMT 61.1

SAP

# chlamydia cases

73

78

83

88

92

129

137

128

STD

# gonorrhea cases

92

120

141

132

105

113

126

126

STD

# syphilis cases

42

24

40

28

44

38

51

54

STD

AIDS Behav Table 5 HIV testing among African American MSM, San Francisco, 2004–2011 Indicator

2004

% Testinga

62.3

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

65.6

Source

72.7

% Testinga

NHBS

58

% Testinga

BMT 62.5

SAP

# African American MSM Tests

649

736

638

563

710

544

757

527

CHEP (new tests)

% HIV?b

5.2

3.9

4.2

3.6

2.4

2

2

4.2

CHEP (new tests)

a

HIV testing among those not already HIV positive, past 6 months

b

% Testing positive among those tested. HIV positivity rate (not population HIV prevalence) NHBS National HIV Behavioral Surveillance, BMT Black Men Testing, SAP Stop AIDS Project, CHEP Community Health Equity and Promotion

Table 6 Social/environment indicators, MSM, San Francisco, 2004–2011 Indicator

2004

Mixing (Newman’s Coefficient), African American MSM

0.4

Mixing (Newman’s Coefficient), all MSM

0.08

% Virally suppressed, all MSM

32

% HIV infected, all MSM

24

a

Ref. [3]

b

Ref. [8]

2005

33

2006

41

2007

48

2008

2011

Source

0.12

0.1

NHBSa

0.02

0

NHBSa

52 23

2009

54

2010

57

59

Case reporting

23

NHBSb

NHBS National HIV Behavioral Surveillance, Case Reporting mandated disease reporting Newman’s coefficient [15]

proportions of men within a sexual network are unaware of their HIV infection. We found that over the course of our study period that the proportion of African American MSM in NHBS who reported an HIV test in the past 6 months increased by approximately 10 %. While seroadaptive strategies are not currently recommended as an HIV prevention intervention for MSM, the increase in these reported behaviors with increased HIV testing may partly explain the reduction in the disparities among African American MSM in San Francisco, California. African American MSM are having sex with a wider range of other MSM in 2011 compared to 2004 while overall, viral suppression has increased among all MSM. This may suggest that African American MSM are less likely to have sex in situations that may lead to HIV acquisition compared to earlier data that suggested that because of high assortative sexual mixing African American MSM may have more likely been infected regardless of risk behavior profiles [17]. Of course, there are limitations to our synthesis of the available data. First, each indicator is only as strong as the original data from which it was drawn. Our use of multiple sources of data for individual indicators should ameliorate this limitation, as individual sources of data are unlikely to be biased in similar directions. Secondly, there may be data

sources that we were not able to access during our analysis. Future efforts to monitor the epidemic in this population can make every effort to discover and access more data sources. Thirdly, any estimates based on case reports may be low estimates due to the lag between actual infection and cases being reported. Lastly, synthesis of existing data such as this does not rely on statistical measures of uncertainty (e.g. 95 % Confidence Intervals). Findings and interpretation of the existing data should be taken cautiously. Our analysis suggests that currently the HIV epidemic is stable among African American MSM in San Francisco. Although not directly from our data, it is well worth considering that the observed stability is possibly due to factors prohibiting expansion of new infections rather than decreasing risks for HIV infection among African American MSM. Specifically, individual risk behaviors appear to currently being offset by increased dissortative mixing across races, viral suppression among all MSM, and increased serosorting in the setting where there are fewer HIV-positive men who are unaware of their infection [12, 18]. Should continuing decreases in condom use, increases in the proportion of men who do not engage in a strategy to reduce their risk of infection and increases in imperfect serosorting behaviors continue, these behaviors may

123

AIDS Behav

overwhelm the protection of mixing and viral suppression leading to an increase in new HIV infections among African American MSM. Acknowledgments HD079658-01.

JMS was supported by NIH Grant # K99

References 1. Millett GA, Peterson JL, Wolitski RJ, Stall R. Greater risk for HIV infection of black men who have sex with men: a critical literature review. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(6):1007–19. 2. San Francisco Department of Public Health (2013) 2012 HIV/ AIDS Epidemiology Annual Report. Available at http://www. sfdph.org/dph/files/reports/default.asp. Accessed 25 July 2014. 3. Sudhinaraset M, Raymond HF, McFarland W. The convergence of HIV prevalence and inter-racial sexual mixing among men who have sex with men, San Francisco, 2004-2011. AIDS Behav. 2012;17(4):1550–6. doi:10.1007/s10461-012-0370-3. 4. Magnus M, Kuo I, Phillips G, Shelley K, Rawls A, Montanez L, et al. Elevated HIV prevalence despite lower rates of sexual risk behaviors among African American men in the District of Columbia who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2010;24(10):615–22. 5. Poundstone KE, Strathdee SA, Celentano DD. The social epidemiology of human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Epidemiol Rev. 2004;26:22–35. 6. Presanis AM, De Angelis D, Goubar A, et al. Bayesian evidence synthesis for a transmission dynamic model for HIV among men who have sex with men. Biostatistics. 2011;12(4):666–81. doi:10. 1093/biostatistics/kxr006. 7. WHO. Guidelines for second generation HIV surveillance. 2005. Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2000/WHO_CDS_CSR_ EDC_2000.5.pdf Accessed 26 Aug 2014. 8. Raymond HF, Bereknyei S, Berglas N, Hunter J, Ojeda N, McFarland W. Estimating population size, HIV prevalence and HIV incidence among men who have sex with men in San Francisco: a case example of triangulation methods. STI. 2013;89(5):383–7.

123

9. Gallagher KM, Sullivan PS, Lansky A, Onorato IM. Behavioral surveillance among people at risk for HIV infection in the U.S.: the National Behavioral Surveillance System. Public Health Rep. 2007;122(Sup. 1):32–8. 10. Fuqua V, Chen YH, Packer T, Dowling T, Ick TO, Nguyen BH, Colfax GN, Raymond HF. Using social networks to reach Black MSM for HIV testing and linkage to care. AIDS and Behav. 2012;16(2):255–65. 11. Kellogg TA, Bernstein K, Hecht J, Connors A, Perlhof L, Ick TO, Le B, Mehrtens J, Rive J Jr, McFarland W, Raymond HF. Comparison of HIV behavioral indicators among men who have sex with men across two survey methodologies, San Francisco, 2004 and 2008. STD. 2013;40(9):689–94. doi:10.1097/01.olq. 0000431354.96087.50. 12. Snowden JM, Wei CY, McFarland W, Raymond HF. Prevalence, correlates and trends in seroadaptive behaviors among men who have sex with men, San Francisco, 2004-2011. STI. 2014. doi:10. 1136/sextrans-2013-051368. 13. Bohl D, McFarland W, Raymond HF. Improved measures of racial mixing among men who have sex with men using Newman’s assortivity coefficient. STI. 2010;87(7):616–20. 14. San Francisco HIV Prevention Planning Council. 2004 San Francisco HIV Prevention Plan. 2004. Available at http://www. sfhiv.org/wp-content/uploads/HIV-Prev-Plan2010_final.pdf. Accessed 26 Aug 2014. 15. Newman ME. Mixing patterns in networks. Phys Rev E. 2003;67(2 Pt 2):026126. 16. Golden MR, Dombrowski JC, Kerani JD, Stekler JP. Failure of serosorting to protect African American men who have sex with men from HIV infection. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39(9):659–64. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31825727cb. 17. Raymond HF, McFarland W. Racial mixing among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(4):671–6. 18. Raymond HF, Chen Y-H, Ick TO, Scheer S, Bernstein K, Liska S, Louie B, Pandori M, McFarland W. A new trend in the HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men, San Francisco, 2004-2011. JAIDS. 2013;62(5):584–9. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e318285febf. 19. San Francisco Department of Public Health (2006). HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Annual Report. Available at http://www.sfdph.org/ dph/files/ContractRequest4/RFP022011/RptsHIVAIDS/HIVAI DAnnlRpt2005.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2014.

Trends in the HIV Epidemic Among African American Men Who Have Sex with Men, San Francisco, 2004-2011.

African American men who have sex with men have been disproportionately affected by the HIV epidemic in the United States and remain to this day one o...
184KB Sizes 0 Downloads 6 Views