J Neurosurg 120:612–617, 2014 ©AANS, 2014

Treatment of moyamoya disease in the adult population with pial synangiosis Clinical article Ning Lin, M.D.,1,2 Joshua P. Aronson, M.D.,1,2 Sunil Manjila, M.D., 3 Edward R. Smith, M.D.,1,2 and R. Michael Scott, M.D.1,2 Department of Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital Boston; 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and 3University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio 1

Object. Surgical treatment of moyamoya disease in the adult population commonly uses direct revascularization, the superficial temporal artery (STA) to middle cerebral artery (MCA) bypass (STA-MCA). Pial synangiosis, a method of indirect revascularization, has been used in adult patients with moyamoya when STA-MCA bypass was not technically feasible. Although the effectiveness of pial synangiosis has been well described in children, only limited reports have examined its role in adult patients with moyamoya disease. In this study the authors report on their experience with pial synangiosis revascularization for this population. Methods. The authors reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of all adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) with moyamoya disease who underwent cerebral revascularization surgery using pial synangiosis at a single institution. Results. From 1985 to 2010, 66 procedures (6 unilateral, 30 bilateral) were performed on 36 adult patients with moyamoya disease. The mean age at surgery was 28.3 years, and 30 patients were female. Twenty-eight patients (77.8%) presented with transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), 24 (66.7%) with stroke, and 3 (8.3%) with hemorrhage. Preoperative Suzuki stage was III or higher in 50 hemispheres (75.8%) and 3 patients had undergone prior treatments to the affected hemisphere before pial synangiosis surgery. Clinical follow-up was available for an average of 5.8 years (range 0.6–14.1 years), with 26 patients (72.2%) followed for longer than 2 years. Postoperative angiography was available for 24 patients and 46 revascularized hemispheres, and 39 (84.8%) of the 46 hemispheres demonstrated good collateral formation (Matsushima Grade A or B). Postoperative complications included 3 strokes, 5 TIAs, and 2 seizures, and there was no hemorrhage during the follow-up period. One patient required additional revascularization surgery 8 months after pial synangiosis. Conclusions. Pial synangiosis is a safe and durable method of cerebral revascularization in adult patients with moyamoya and can be considered as a potential treatment option for moyamoya disease in adults. (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2013.11.JNS131027)

C

Key Words      •      moyamoya disease      •      stroke      •      pial synangiosis      •      transient ischemic attack      •      vascular disorders

onsiderable debate exists regarding the relative merits and shortcomings of the two common approaches used for revascularization in moyamoya disease: direct revascularization, involving an anastomosis of a branch of the superficial temporal artery (STA) to the brain; and indirect revascularization, placing vascularized tissue in contact with the brain to foster growth of new collaterals. Some centers advocate combinations of both approaches.3,7,8,11–13 A recent review of the literature concerning optimal treatment concludes that there is evidence that both direct and indirect revascularization are

Abbreviations used in this paper: DSA = digital subtraction angiography; EDAS = encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis; MCA = middle cerebral artery; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; STA = superficial temporal artery; TIA = transient ischemic attack.

612

of benefit, but determining the most effective treatment awaits further studies.9,24 In the absence of randomized trials, the choice of treatment is often dependent on the preference and training of the cerebrovascular neurosurgeon, with most US hospitals using direct approaches for adults. In this paper we present data from our center on pial synangiosis (an indirect revascularization procedure) in adult patients with moyamoya disease, supporting this approach as an efficacious and safe treatment for this population.

Patient Selection

Methods

A consecutive surgical series of patients with moyaJ Neurosurg / Volume 120 / March 2014

Pial synangiosis in adult moyamoya disease moya arteriopathy who underwent pial synangiosis between 1985 and 2010 was reviewed to identify all patients 18 years of age or older at the time of surgery. All patients within this time period were included. In accordance with a protocol approved by the institutional review board, medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed to determine demographic and clinical information such as age at presentation, sex, medical comorbidities, symptoms, and results of radiographic studies (including CT, MRI/MR angiography, and conventional angiography) interpreted by fellowship-trained Board-certified pediatric neuroradiologists and attending neurosurgeons. The neurological examination was documented preoperatively (using modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores) and Suzuki stage on preoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Treatment course and outcome variables included perioperative and late complications, length of follow-up, and long-term clinical and radiographic results, all recorded and maintained by the attending neurosurgeons and nurse practitioners as per the protocol approved by the institutional review board. Surgical Treatment

The technique of pial synangiosis has been described previously.18,22 Briefly, the parietal branch of the STA is mapped with Doppler ultrasonography, and an STA graft of 9–10 cm is isolated and dissected free, maintaining continuity of blood flow in the donor artery. A large craniotomy is performed and the dura mater is opened into multiple flaps. The arachnoid membrane is dissected widely to expose the pial surface, and the STA graft is affixed to the pia with 10-0 monofilament nylon sutures. Patients routinely are administered aspirin throughout the perioperative period. Adult patients who present with bilateral disease and require treatments to both hemispheres are usually managed with staged operations, with an interval of 1–6 weeks between the two surgeries. As recently as 2006, our practice has been to perform both sides in bilateral cases under a single anesthesia procedure, assuming no intraoperative complications or other technical considerations arise. Statistical Analysis

The differences in demographic and clinical characteristics were examined using chi-square and 2-tailed t-tests for binary and continuous variables, respectively. The association between postoperative outcome and age, sex, severity of arteriopathy, and syndromic conditions (neurofibromatosis Type 1, Down syndrome, sickle cell anemia, and previous radiation treatment) was evaluated.

Results Patient Population

Of all moyamoya patients who were treated between 1985 and 2010, 36 patients were over 18 years of age at the time of pial synangiosis. Demographic and clinical information of the patients in the study are summarized in Table 1. The mean age was 27.5 ± 6.8 years (range 18.1–50.9 years); 30 patients were female, and 6 patients were Asian. Seven patients in the cohort had syndromic

J Neurosurg / Volume 120 / March 2014

TABLE 1: Demographic information and clinical characteristics of 36 adult patients with moyamoya disease* Variable age (yrs)   mean ± SD  range sex  female  male Asian associated disease/condition   neurofibromatosis Type 1   Down syndrome   sickle cell anemia   prior radiation treatment bilateral moyamoya  yes  no prior treatment  yes  no vascular risk factors  diabetes   hypertension  smoking presenting symptoms   TIA  stroke  seizure  hemorrhage

Value 27.5 ± 6.8 18.1–50.9 30 (83.3) 6 (16.7) 6 (16.7) 2 (5.6) 4 (11.1) 1 (2.8) 3 (8.3) 32 (88.9) 4 (11.1) 3 (8.3) 33 (91.7) 2 (5.6) 4 (11.1) 6 (16.7) 28 (77.8) 24 (66.7) 9 (25.0) 3 (8.3)

*  All data given as number (%) unless otherwise indicated.

conditions, including neurofibromatosis Type 1 (n = 2), Down syndrome (n = 4), and sickle cell anemia (n = 1). Three patients had a history of craniopharyngioma and had prior cranial radiation treatment. Four patients had unilateral moyamoya disease and underwent revascularization of the affected hemisphere only, and 32 had bilateral moyamoya. Of these, 1 patient who was operated on at the age of 14 for left-sided moyamoya disease developed right-sided moyamoya in adulthood, and underwent right pial synangiosis at 23 years of age. Another patient underwent previous bilateral pial synangiosis at age 15 and had frontal failure presenting as drop attacks (transient episodes of acute loss of body tone), and thus underwent pial synangiosis in the right anterior cerebral artery territory at age 22 using a frontal STA supply. As a result, a total of 66 hemispheres were included in the analyses. The unilateral cases bear specific mention. As noted, 4 patients had only unilateral disease. However, of the 32 other patients with bilateral disease, it is important to recognize that 5 of them initially presented with unilateral moyamoya, then progressed to develop bilateral disease (with subsequent treatment) during the period of the 613

N. Lin et al. study. Consequently, 9 patients initially presented with unilateral moyamoya, but 5 (55.6%) of these 9 progressed to develop bilateral moyamoya. Three patients received treatments to the affected hemisphere prior to the pial synangiosis surgery. One patient who underwent left encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS) at another institution continued to experience episodes of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), and was treated with bilateral pial synangiosis at 51 years of age. Another patient had undergone unsuccessful angioplasty of the right middle cerebral artery (MCA) prior to right pial synangiosis. The third patient had undergone bilateral pial synangiosis and continued drop attacks. Clinical and Radiographic Characteristics

Transient ischemic attack was the most frequent pre­ senting symptom in the study cohort (28/36, 77.8%). Twen­ ty-four patients (66.7%) experienced clinical strokes prior to surgical treatment, and 3 (8.3%) presented with hemorrhage. Preoperative vascular risk factors included diabetes (n = 2), hypertension (n = 4), and smoking (n = 6). Magnetic resonance imaging and DSA were routinely obtained during preoperative workup, and these results are summarized in Table 2. Fifty affected hemispheres (50/66, 75.8%) exhibited evidence of slow cortical blood flow (the ivy sign) on MRI FLAIR sequences, and 42 (63.6%) demonstrated the presence of stroke. Digital subtraction angiography prior to surgery was available to review in 30 patients (86%) and 54 hemispheres (84%). Severity of moyamoya disease was quantified with Suzuki stage (I–VI, with Stage VI the most severe).26 The majority of the affected hemispheres (36/66, 54.5%) had Suzuki Stage III–IV, and the average Suzuki stage of the study cohort was 3.6.

Surgical Management and Perioperative Complications

Pial synangiosis was successfully performed in all patients in the study cohort. The average length of the STA graft was 8.9 ± 1.4 cm. One patient underwent STAMCA bypass for the left hemisphere and pial synangiosis for the right, and another underwent encephalomyosynangiosis for the left hemisphere because the STA had been TABLE 2: Radiographic presentation of 36 adult patients with moyamoya disease (66 affected hemispheres) Variable Suzuki stage   I–II   III–IV   V–VI   not applicable slow cortical blood flow (ivy sign)   present  absent evidence of stroke   present  absent

614

Value (%) 6 (9.1) 36 (54.5) 14 (21.2) 10 (15.2) 50 (75.8) 16 (24.2) 42 (63.6) 24 (36.4)

TABLE 3: Postoperative and long-term outcome after pial synangiosis Variable postop complications   TIA  infarction  hemorrhage  seizure   wound infection  death follow-up events   TIA  infarction  hemorrhage  seizure   reoperation  death long-term outcome†   favorable (mRS score 0–2)   unfavorable (mRS score 3–6) postop angiography‡   Matsushima Grade A   Matsushima Grade B   Matsushima Grade C

Value 5 3 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 2 1 1* 29/32 (90.6) 3/32 (9.4) 22/46 (47.8) 17/46 (37.0) 7/46 (15.2)

*  Patient died of lung cancer 5 years after undergoing right pial synangiosis. †  Values represent the number of patients (%). ‡  Values represent the number of hemispheres (%).

sacrificed in a previous jaw surgery. Of the 32 patients who underwent surgery for bilateral moyamoya disease as adults, 8 patients had both procedures under a single anesthesia procedure, 18 had planned staged operations with an interval of 1–6 weeks between surgeries, and 3 had a delayed second operation due to disease progression (between 36 and 172 weeks after the first surgery). Postoperative TIAs and seizures occurred in 5 and 2 patients, respectively (Table 3). Three patients suffered a stroke in the ipsilateral hemisphere within 48 hours after surgery, one of whom underwent encephalomyosynangiosis surgery instead of pial synangiosis. There was no contralateral stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, or death in the perioperative period. Follow-Up and Postoperative Angiographic Results

Follow-up information was available for all 36 patients, and the mean follow-up period was 5.8 years (range 0.6–14.1 years), with 26 patients followed for more than 2 years. There was no stroke or hemorrhage during the follow-up period. One patient died of lung cancer 5 years after undergoing right pial synangiosis. Two patients continued to experience TIAs after surgery but did not experience new strokes, according to follow-up MRI. One of these patients spontaneously improved 6 months after surgery, and the other had poor collateral J Neurosurg / Volume 120 / March 2014

Pial synangiosis in adult moyamoya disease formation on the right hemisphere on postoperative DSA and underwent STA-MCA bypass 8 months after pial synangiosis (Table 3). Functional results were assessed by mRS scores assigned to 32 patients (88.9%) willing to be assessed using the mRS during the last follow-up appointment, and 29 (90.6%) of these 32 patients had favorable outcomes (mRS Score 0–2), whereas 3 (9.4%) had unfavorable outcomes. Postoperative DSA was obtained 10–12 months after the surgery and was available for 24 patients with 46 treated hemispheres (69.7%). The degree of cerebral revascularization was evaluated with the Matsushima scale18 (Table 3), and good collateralization (Matsushima Grade A or B) was found in 39 hemispheres (84.8%).

Discussion

Moyamoya disease is a progressive arteriopathy char­ acterized by stenosis and occlusion of the intracranial in­ternal carotid artery.15,19 It is a rare entity and is most commonly found in Japan, but has been increasingly recognized in the US and western countries. A hallmark of moyamoya disease in children is its relentless progression, and if left untreated, more than two-thirds of patients may develop new symptoms within a 5-year period.17,20,21 Moyamoya in adults is believed to be a less aggressive process than in the pediatric population;23 nevertheless, natural history studies have indicated that more than 20% of adult patients experience symptomatic progression,16 and medical therapy does not halt disease progression. Moreover, the cognitive effect of moyamoya disease in adult patients has only recently been studied,2,5,6,27 and it was reported that hypoperfusion in the affected hemispheres correlated with significant impairment in memory and learning, which could improve after surgical revascularization.28 The cumulative evidence suggested that moyamoya disease in symptomatic adult patients warranted similar aggressive intervention as in children to prevent further deleterious consequences. Historically, direct bypass procedures (STA-MCA bypass) have been successfully used to treat moyamoya disease in adult patients and it has the advantage of providing immediate augmentation of blood flow to the ischemic brain after surgery.7,24 Guzman et al.10 reviewed a large single-institution series of 233 adult patients with

moyamoya (389 treated hemispheres) who underwent STA-MCA bypass and demonstrated that more than 90% of patients experienced improved or the same quality of life after surgery (Table 4). Eight adult patients suffered ischemic strokes and 8 suffered a hemorrhage during the postoperative period (within 30 days of surgery) and longterm follow-up (mean 4.9 years), which translated into an approximately 3%–4% risk for each complication. On the other hand, indirect revascularization techniques such as EDAS have recently been reported as an alternative treatment for adult patients with moyamoya, especially when direct bypass is not technically feasible.14 Starke et al.25 analyzed 43 North American patients (67 affected hemispheres) who underwent EDAS and showed that 88% of patients had preserved or improved functional status after surgery, as measured by mRS score. The authors also reported a higher risk of ischemic complications in the cohort than postoperative hemorrhage: 8 patients developed ischemic strokes (18.6%), but there was only 1 hemorrhagic event (2.3%). Most recently, Bao et al.1 reported on a cohort of 470 Chinese adult patients with moyamoya treated with EDAS, and found similar patterns of postoperative complications. The rate of postoperative ischemic events or hemorrhage was 5.9%. When calculating with the number of hemispheres treated, the overall stroke risk was approximately 10% per hemisphere in the first 2 years, and the 5-year Kaplan-Meier risk of stroke was 13% after surgery for all patients treated using surgical revascularization. Duan et al., in a series of 802 adult Chinese patients with moyamoya treated at a single institution, reported a 12.7% risk of stroke in patients with surgical revascularization.4 A summary of previously reported surgical series on adult patients with moyamoya disease is presented in Table 4. In our study, 36 adult patients underwent 66 pial synangiosis operations. There were 3 immediate postoperative strokes and no delayed ischemic or hemorrhagic events, and 90.6% (29/32) of evaluated patients had a favorable outcome after a mean follow-up period of 5.8 years. The overall stroke rate was 8.3% (4.5% per treated hemisphere). These data compare favorably with other reported series of indirect bypass procedures for adult patients with moyamoya disease,1–3,25,27,29 and suggest that pial synangiosis is safe, effective, and durable for cerebral ischemic protection. The complication profile in this

TABLE 4: Summary of literature search on the outcome of adult patients with moyamoya disease* Authors & Year

No. of Patients/ Hemispheres

Mean Age (yrs)

Treatment

Follow-Up (yrs)

Stroke†

Hemorrhage‡

Favorable Outcome§

Guzman et al., 2009 Bao et al., 2012 Czabanka et al., 2009 Starke et al., 200925 Lin et al., 2011

233/389 470/752 10/19 43/67 36/66

39.5 36.8 38.4 40.0 28.3

STA-MCA EDAS STA-MCA & EMS EDAS pial synangiosis

4.9 2.2 2 3.4 5.8

8 (3.4%) 77 (16.4%) 0 8 (18.6%) 3 (8.3%)

8 (3.4%) 20 (4.3%) 0 1 (2.3%) 0 (0%)

94.8% 343 (73.2%) 10 (100%) 38 (88.4%) 29 (90.6%)

*  EMS = encephalomyosynangiosis. †  Indicates overall risk of new strokes during the entire follow-up period, including the postoperative period. ‡  Indicates overall risk of hemorrhage during the entire follow-up period, including the postoperative period. §  Measured as preserved or improved functional status, or mRS score < 2.

J Neurosurg / Volume 120 / March 2014

615

N. Lin et al. study was consistent with other reports in the literature and indicated that, compared with direct bypass, those treated with indirect bypass might have a higher risk of postoperative stroke and a lower risk of hemorrhage. Revascularization usually does not occur for several weeks using indirect techniques, which could account for the higher rate of postoperative ischemia; nevertheless, gradual augmentation of cerebral blood flow might reduce the risk of hyperperfusion and perioperative hemorrhage. While the relative merits and shortcomings of the two approaches will continue to be debated, pial synangiosis can be appealing in an adult population, especially for those with diminutive donor or recipient graft vessels. Of the 36 patients in our series, 32 were discovered to have significant moyamoya in both hemispheres at presentation and were treated bilaterally. The remaining 4 patients were treated unilaterally at the beginning, but 5 (55.6%) developed progression of disease during the follow-up period and required additional surgery. This observation confirmed the evidence reported in the literature that moyamoya progression can be relentless even in adults, and close follow-up is needed to detect early signs of radiographic progression before symptoms occur.17

Conclusions

Although the optimal treatment for moyamoya disease in the adult population remains unclear, our patient series demonstrated that collateral formation following pial synangiosis is sufficient to prevent new infarcts and can provide adequate intracranial perfusion through an extended follow-up period. The complication rate in the perioperative period and beyond was relatively low and the procedure was well tolerated. These data collectively suggest that indirect revascularization via pial synangiosis is an additional safe and durable option for the treatment of moyamoya disease in adults. Disclosure The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper. Author contributions to the study and manuscript preparation include the following. Conception and design: Smith, Lin, Aronson, Scott. Acquisition of data: Smith, Lin, Aronson. Analysis and interpretation of data: Smith, Lin, Aronson. Drafting the article: Lin, Aronson, Scott. Critically revising the article: all authors. Reviewed submitted version of manuscript: all authors. Approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors: Smith. Administrative/technical/material support: Smith. Study supervision: Smith, Scott. References   1.  Bao XY, Duan L, Li DS, Yang WZ, Sun WJ, Zhang ZS, et al: Clinical features, surgical treatment and long-term outcome in adult patients with Moyamoya disease in China. Cerebrovasc Dis 34:305–313, 2012   2.  Calviere L, Catalaa I, Marlats F, Viguier A, Bonneville F, Cognard C, et al: Correlation between cognitive impairment and cerebral hemodynamic disturbances on perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in European adults with moyamoya disease. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 113:753–759, 2010

616

  3.  Czabanka M, Vajkoczy P, Schmiedek P, Horn P: Age-dependent revascularization patterns in the treatment of moyamoya disease in a European patient population. Neurosurg Focus 26(4):E9, 2009   4.  Duan L, Bao XY, Yang WZ, Shi WC, Li DS, Zhang ZS, et al: Moyamoya disease in China: its clinical features and outcomes. Stroke 43:56–60, 2012   5.  Dusick JR, Gonzalez NR, Martin NA: Clinical and angiographic outcomes from indirect revascularization surgery for Moyamoya disease in adults and children: a review of 63 procedures. Neurosurgery 68:34–43, 2011   6.  Festa JR, Schwarz LR, Pliskin N, Cullum CM, Lacritz L, Charbel FT, et al: Neurocognitive dysfunction in adult moyamoya disease. J Neurol 257:806–815, 2010   7.  Fujimura M, Kaneta T, Mugikura S, Shimizu H, Tominaga T: Temporary neurologic deterioration due to cerebral hyperperfusion after superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery anastomosis in patients with adult-onset moyamoya disease. Surg Neurol 67:273–282, 2007   8.  Fujimura M, Mugikura S, Kaneta T, Shimizu H, Tominaga T: Incidence and risk factors for symptomatic cerebral hyperperfusion after superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery anastomosis in patients with moyamoya disease. Surg Neurol 71:442–447, 2009   9.  Fung LW, Thompson D, Ganesan V: Revascularisation surgery for paediatric moyamoya: a review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 21:358–364, 2005 10.  Guzman R, Lee M, Achrol A, Bell-Stephens T, Kelly M, Do HM, et al: Clinical outcome after 450 revascularization procedures for moyamoya disease. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 111:927–935, 2009 11.  Hallemeier CL, Rich KM, Grubb RL Jr, Chicoine MR, Moran CJ, Cross DT III, et al: Clinical features and outcome in North American adults with moyamoya phenomenon. Stroke 37:1490–1496, 2006 12.  Karasawa J, Kikuchi H, Furuse S, Kawamura J, Sakaki T: Treatment of moyamoya disease with STA-MCA anastomosis. J Neurosurg 49:679–688, 1978 13.  Khan N, Schuknecht B, Boltshauser E, Capone A, Buck A, Imhof HG, et al: Moyamoya disease and Moyamoya syndrome: experience in Europe; choice of revascularisation procedures. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 145:1061–1071, 2003 14. Kinugasa K, Mandai S, Kamata I, Sugiu K, Ohmoto T: Surgical treatment of moyamoya disease: operative technique for encephalo-duro-arterio-myo-synangiosis, its follow-up, clinical results, and angiograms. Neurosurgery 32:527–531, 1993 15.  Kuroda S, Houkin K: Moyamoya disease: current concepts and future perspectives. Lancet Neurol 7:1056–1066, 2008 16.  Kuroda S, Ishikawa T, Houkin K, Nanba R, Hokari M, Iwasaki Y: Incidence and clinical features of disease progression in adult moyamoya disease. Stroke 36:2148–2153, 2005 17.  Lin N, Baird L, Koss M, Kopecky KE, Gone E, Ullrich NJ, et al: Discovery of asymptomatic moyamoya arteriopathy in pediatric syndromic populations: radiographic and clinical progression. Neurosurg Focus 31(6):E6, 2011 18.  Matsushima T, Inoue T, Suzuki SO, Fujii K, Fukui M, Hasuo K: Surgical treatment of moyamoya disease in pediatric patients— comparison between the results of indirect and direct revascularization procedures. Neurosurgery 31:401–405, 1992 19.  Scott RM, Smith ER: Moyamoya disease and moyamoya syndrome. N Engl J Med 360:1226–1237, 2009 20.  Scott RM, Smith JL, Robertson RL, Madsen JR, Soriano SG, Rockoff MA: Long-term outcome in children with moyamoya syndrome after cranial revascularization by pial synangiosis. J Neurosurg 100 (2 Suppl Pediatrics):142–149, 2004 21.  Smith ER, Scott RM: Progression of disease in unilateral moyamoya syndrome. Neurosurg Focus 24(2):E17, 2008 22.  Smith ER, Scott RM: Surgical management of moyamoya syndrome. Skull Base 15:15–26, 2005

J Neurosurg / Volume 120 / March 2014

Pial synangiosis in adult moyamoya disease 23.  Srinivasan J, Britz GW, Newell DW: Cerebral revascularization for moyamoya disease in adults. Neurosurg Clin N Am 12:585–594, ix, 2001 24.  Starke RM, Komotar RJ, Connolly ES: Optimal surgical treatment for moyamoya disease in adults: direct versus indirect bypass. Neurosurg Focus 26(4):E8, 2009 25.  Starke RM, Komotar RJ, Hickman ZL, Paz YE, Pugliese AG, Otten ML, et al: Clinical features, surgical treatment, and long-term outcome in adult patients with moyamoya disease. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 111:936–942, 2009 26.  Suzuki JTA, Takaku A: Cerebrovascular “moyamoya” disease. Disease showing abnormal net-like vessels in base of brain. Arch Neurol 20:288–299, 1969 27.  Weinberg DG, Rahme RJ, Aoun SG, Batjer HH, Bendok BR: Moyamoya disease: functional and neurocognitive outcomes in the pediatric and adult populations. Neurosurg Focus 30(6): E21, 2011 28.  Wityk RJ, Hillis A, Beauchamp N, Barker PB, Rigamonti D:

J Neurosurg / Volume 120 / March 2014

Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in adult moyamoya syndrome: characteristic patterns and change after surgical intervention: case report. Neurosurgery 51:1499–1506, 2002 29.  Zipfel GJ, Fox DJ Jr, Rivet DJ: Moyamoya disease in adults: the role of cerebral revascularization. Skull Base 15:27–41, 2005

Manuscript submitted May 17, 2013. Accepted November 21, 2013. Please include this information when citing this paper: published online January 3, 2014; DOI: 10.3171/2013.11.JNS131027. Address correspondence to: Edward R. Smith, M.D., Harvard Medical School, Department of Neurosurgery, The Children’s Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. email: [email protected].

617

Treatment of Moyamoya disease in the adult population with pial synangiosis.

Surgical treatment of moyamoya disease in the adult population commonly uses direct revascularization, the superficial temporal artery (STA) to middle...
996KB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views