THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 289, NO. 51, pp. 35656 –35667, December 19, 2014 © 2014 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Published in the U.S.A.

The Role of the Strictly Conserved Positively Charged Residue Differs among the Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and Chloroplast YidC Homologs* Received for publication, July 8, 2014, and in revised form, October 22, 2014 Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 30, 2014, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M114.595082

Yuanyuan Chen‡1, Raunak Soman‡1, Sri Karthika Shanmugam‡, Andreas Kuhn§, and Ross E. Dalbey‡2 From the ‡Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 and the §Institute of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany

Recently, the structure of YidC2 from Bacillus halodurans revealed that the conserved positively charged residue within transmembrane segment one (at position 72) is located in a hydrophilic groove that is embedded in the inner leaflet of the lipid bilayer. The arginine residue was essential for the Bacillus subtilis SpoIIIJ (YidC1) to insert MifM and to complement a SpoIIIJ mutant strain. Here, we investigated the importance of the conserved positively charged residue for the function of the Escherichia coli YidC, Streptococcus mutans YidC2, and the chloroplast Arabidopsis thaliana Alb3. Like the Gram-positive B. subtilis SpoIIIJ, the conserved arginine was required for functioning of the Gram-positive S. mutans YidC2 and was necessary to complement the E. coli YidC depletion strain and to promote insertion of a YidC-dependent membrane protein synthesized with one but not two hydrophobic segments. In contrast, the conserved positively charged residue was not required for the E. coli YidC or the A. thaliana Alb3 to functionally complement the E. coli YidC depletion strain or to promote insertion of YidC-dependent membrane proteins. Our results also show that the C-terminal half of the helical hairpin structure in cytoplasmic loop C1 is important for the activity of YidC because various deletions in the region either eliminate or impair YidC function. The results here underscore the importance of the cytoplasmic hairpin region for YidC and show that the arginine is critical for the tested Gram-positive YidC homolog but is not essential for the tested Gram-negative and chloroplast YidC homologs.

The YidC/Oxa1/Alb3 family of proteins facilitates the insertion, folding, and assembly of proteins in all kingdoms of life (1–3). Bacterial YidC can function either independently or cooperatively with the Sec machinery in membrane protein insertion (4 – 6). The bacterial YidC promotes the insertion of

* This

work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant MCB1052033 (to R. E. D.) and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Ku749/6 (to A. K.). 1 Both authors contributed equally to this work. 2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dalbey@chemistry. ohio-state.edu.

35656 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

proteins into the cytoplasmic membrane, whereas the mitochondrial Oxa1 and chloroplast Alb3 homologs catalyze the insertion/folding of proteins into the inner membrane of mitochondria and the thylakoid membrane of chloroplasts, respectively. Intriguingly, the chloroplast Alb3, mitochondrial Oxa1, and the Streptococcus mutans YidC2 homologs can functionally substitute for YidC in Escherichia coli (7–9). Conversely, bacterial YidC can substitute for the mitochondrial Oxa1 (when the extended C-terminal matrix domain of Oxa1 is attached to YidC) and support insertion of Oxa1 substrates into the inner membrane of the mitochondria (10). All YidC proteins have an evolutionarily conserved core domain of five TM3 segments, containing the insertase activity of the proteins (11–13). First, the Gram-positive bacterial YidC and the organellar Oxa1 and Alb3 proteins contain only five TM domains. These proteins are synthesized with the respective presequences, which are proteolytically removed following membrane insertion. Second, the E. coli YidC has an extra TM segment at its N terminus and a large periplasmic domain following it (14), but these regions are not essential for YidC activity (15). The region containing the C-terminal five TM segments is essential for the membrane insertase activity of the E. coli YidC (15). Until recently, there was very little structural information available on YidC. In 2008, x-ray crystallography showed that the large periplasmic domain of the E. coli YidC adopted a super-␤-sandwich domain commonly seen in sugar-binding proteins (16, 17). Using cryo-electron microscopy methods, Kohler et al. (18) showed that YidC was bound to the ribosome nascent chain complex as a dimer, whereas Seitl et al. (19) showed that YidC can bind a ribosome nascent chain as a monomer. This latter study and Kedrov et al. (20) confirmed that the functional unit of YidC is a monomer. In 2014, there was a breakthrough in the YidC/Oxa1/Alb3 field with the determination of the crystal structure of the Bacillus halodurans YidC2 at a 2.4 Å resolution (21). The struc-

3

The abbreviations used are: TM, transmembrane segment; PC-Lep, Procoat Lep.

VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 51 • DECEMBER 19, 2014

Downloaded from http://www.jbc.org/ at AGA KHAN UNIV MED COLL on March 6, 2015

Background: B. subtilis YidC1 requires the strictly conserved arginine for function. Results: The conserved positively charged residue is critical for S. mutans YidC2 function but not for E. coli or chloroplast homologs. Conclusion: The role of the positively charged residue differs among YidC family members and for insertion of various substrates. Significance: Understanding the importance of the conserved charge is crucial for defining the YidC insertion mechanism.

Strictly Conserved Positive Charge among YidC Homologs

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Materials, Strains, and Plasmids—Ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and lysozyme were purchased from Sigma. Proteinase K was purchased from Life Technologies. Isopropyl 1-thio-␤-Dgalactopyranoside was from Research Products International Corp. PMSF was purchased from United States Biochemical (Affymetrix). Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.2) was purchased from Thermo Scientific. Tran-35S-label, a mixture of 85% [35S]methionine and 15% [35S]cysteine, 1000 Ci/mmol, DECEMBER 19, 2014 • VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 51

was from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. Antisera to leader peptidase (anti-Lep) and outer membrane protein A (anti-OmpA) were from our own laboratory collection. JS7131, the YidC depletion strain (from our collection), has its endogenous yidC inactivated and has a new copy of the yidC gene inserted at the ␭ attachment site, under the control of the araBAD promoter (22). The low copy number plasmid pACYC184, which encodes chloramphenicol resistance, was used to express mutants of the E. coli YidC, the S. mutans 247YidC2, and Arabidopsis thaliana H1Alb3 (7, 9). Expression of these pACYC184-encoded proteins is under control of the native yidC promoter to ensure close to chromosomal levels of protein expression. H1Alb3 is a YidC-Alb3 fusion protein, which possesses the first 57 amino acids of YidC, a linker valine residue, and residues 59 – 462 of Alb3 (7). 247YidC2 is comprised of residues 1–247 of the E. coli YidC fused to residues 25–310 of S. mutans YidC (9). The high copy number plasmid pMS119 (ampicillin-resistant) was used to express Pf3-23Lep (23), Procoat-Lep (PC-Lep, 25), or PreCyoA-N-P2 (26) under the control of the lac promoter. All of the mutants of YidC homologs were constructed by site-directed mutagenesis using PCR. All of the mutations were verified by DNA sequencing. Bacterial Growth and Pulse Labeling—E. coli JS7131 was transformed with pMS119 encoding either Pf3-23Lep, PCLep, or PreCyoA-N-P2 and then further transformed with pACYC184 encoding YidC or the appropriate homolog (H1Alb3 or 247YidC2). The cells were grown in LB media in the presence of ampicillin (final concentration, 100 ␮g/ml) and chloramphenicol (final concentration, 25 ␮g/ml). Depletion of the chromosomally encoded YidC was achieved by growth in the presence of 0.2% glucose for 3 h at 37 °C. The cells were subsequently washed with M9 medium and then transferred into this medium, which lacks Met, and grown for 30 min. Expression of YidC-dependent membrane proteins was induced with 1 mM isopropyl ␤-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside for 5 min, followed by pulse-labeling with [35S]methionine (70 ␮Ci/ ml) for 1 min. Signal Peptide Processing and Protease Mapping—To analyze membrane insertion of PC-Lep and PreCyoA-N-P2, a signal peptide cleavage assay was used. After [35S] labeling, an equal volume of 20% TCA was added to precipitate total proteins. The precipitate was washed with ice-cold acetone and resuspended in Tris-SDS (pH 8.0) buffer. The samples were then subjected to immunoprecipitation to examine membrane insertion by signal peptide processing of PC-Lep to C-Lep or PreCyoA-N-P2 to CyoA-N-P2. Antiserum to leader peptidase was used to immunoprecipitate PC-Lep and C-Lep or PreCyoAN-P2 and CyoA-N-P2. Protease accessibility was employed to assay membrane insertion of Pf3-23Lep. Following radiolabeling, cells were collected by centrifugation at 4 °C and resuspended in 40% sucrose and 33 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). To prepare spheroplasts, lysozyme (5 ␮g/ml) and 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0) were added, and the sample was kept on ice for 20 min. Where indicated, proteinase K was added (0.5 mg/ml final concentration) and incubated on ice for 1 h, followed by the addition of PMSF to quench the proteinase K reaction. Immunoprecipitation of Pf3-23Lep was performed using leader peptidase antiserum, JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

35657

Downloaded from http://www.jbc.org/ at AGA KHAN UNIV MED COLL on March 6, 2015

ture revealed a novel fold and showed that the five conserved TM helices form a hydrophilic groove containing a conserved positively charged residue (Fig. 1A). The hydrophilic groove is located in the inner leaflet of the bilayer and faces the cytoplasm and lipid bilayer. YidC has no hydrophilic pore and is closed to the extracellular side. Kumazaki et al. (21) provided evidence that the conserved positively charged residue in the groove of YidC plays a critical role in membrane insertion of the singlespanning MifM protein that has two negatively charged residues in the translocated tail. The hydrophilic cavity with the arginine is proposed to promote insertion by attracting the negatively charged N-terminal tail of the substrate. Interestingly, the conserved arginine is crucial for Bacillus subtilis SpoIIIJ (YidC1) to function, and SpoIIIJ was only able to rescue the growth of a SpoIIIJ depletion strain when the conserved arginine was changed to a lysine but not when mutated to a neutral or negatively charged residue. This suggests that the positively charged residue is essential for YidC1 to facilitate membrane protein insertion in B. subtilis. Moreover, the hairpin structure at the entrance of the hydrophilic groove at the cytoplasmic surface is important for the activity of SpoIIIJ in B. subtilis and may be important for the binding of YidC substrates. In this study, we investigated the role of the conserved Arg at position 366 for the membrane insertase function of the E. coli YidC. Although E. coli YidC is fully functional with a substituted amino acid with either a polar or an apolar side chain, its function was lost when it was substituted with a negatively charged amino acid in place of Arg-366. In contrast, the conserved positively charged residue was critical for the Grampositive S. mutans YidC2 to complement the E. coli YidC depletion strain. We found only S. mutans YidC2 with a positively charged residue at position 73 was functional in membrane protein insertion in E. coli. In contrast, the chloroplast Alb3 homolog was functional in E. coli even when the conserved lysine (found in place of arginine in the wild-type construct) was substituted with an amino acid with a neutral side chain. However, like the E. coli YidC, Alb3 was not functional when this residue was substituted with a negatively charged amino acid. Finally, the importance of the dynamic hairpin C1 region was examined for the E. coli YidC because this region was proposed to be involved in the initial recruitment of YidC substrates (21). Deletion of the entire helical hairpin structure or deletion of its C-terminal region impaired YidC activity. However, alanine scanning mutagenesis showed the precise amino acid sequence is not important for the helical hairpin function. The results described above indicate a more general role for this cytoplasmic hairpin domain in membrane protein insertion.

Strictly Conserved Positive Charge among YidC Homologs and OmpA was precipitated with OmpA antiserum, as described previously. The samples were analyzed by SDSPAGE and phosphorimaging. Quantitation of the Membrane Insertion Data—The translocation efficiencies were determined by quantitation of the appropriate bands using ImageJ, developed at National Institutes of Health. The percent of translocation across the membrane was determined by calculating the percent of the signal peptidase processed band appearing on the gels. For the Pf3derived proteins the protease-protected bands were analyzed. For Pf3-23Lep, one of the seven methionines in the protein sequence was lost upon proteinase K cleavage, so Equation 1 was used to determine the percent of translocation. % translocation 7/6 cleaved Pf3-23Lep 7/6 cleaved Pf3-23Lep ⫹ uncleaved Pf3-23Lep ⫻ 100 (Eq. 1)

For Procoat-Lep, two out of seven methionine residues were lost upon signal peptidase cleavage; thus Equation 2 was used to determine the percentage of the protein translocated. % translocation ⫽

7/5 processed Procoat-Lep 7/5 processed Procoat-Lep ⫹ unprocessed Procoat-Lep ⫻ 100 (Eq. 2)

For PreCyoA-N-P2, one out of seven methionine residues was lost upon signal peptidase cleavage; therefore, Equation 3 was used to determine the percent of translocation. % translocation ⫽

7/6 processed PreCyoA-N-P2 7/6 processed PreCyoA-N-P2 ⫹ unprocessed PreCyoA-N-P2 ⫻ 100 (Eq. 3)

The % translocation for all the insertion studies is presented in the figures with the data. Complementation Assay—E. coli JS7131 cells bearing the respective pACYC184 plasmids were grown overnight in Luria broth (LB) with 0.2% arabinose and 25 ␮g/ml chloramphenicol. The following morning, the cells were washed once and backdiluted 1:100 into LB medium lacking arabinose. The cells were grown for 3 h and were subsequently serially diluted (1:10, 1:100, 1:1000, and 1:10,000), and 4 ␮l was spotted on LB plates containing 0.2% arabinose or 0.2% glucose and chloramphenicol, respectively. The plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C. The complementation experiments with the E. coli YidC and its mutants (Figs. 2A and 3A), and the A. thaliana H1Alb3 and its mutants (Fig. 5A), respectively, were performed on the same LB ⫹ arabinose agar plate and the same LB ⫹ glucose plate, respectively. The complementation experiments with the S. mutans 247YidC and its mutants (Fig. 4A) were performed on two LB ⫹ arabinose and LB ⫹ glucose plates. Western Blot—An overnight culture of JS7131, bearing pACYC184 expressing YidC or the appropriate homolog, was

35658 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

RESULTS Arginine 366 in the E. coli YidC Is Not Required for Function—The crystal structure of B. halodurans YidC2 revealed a hydrophilic groove that was exposed to the cytoplasm and the inner bilayer leaflet (Fig. 1A) (21). An arginine (at position 72 on the B. halodurans YidC2) was present within the groove, and this arginine in the B. subtilis SpoIIIJ (YidC1) is essential for membrane protein insertion of the single spanning MifM protein. Remarkably, this positive charge is invariant in all YidC homologs in bacteria, mitochondria, and chloroplasts, even though little of the overall YidC sequence is conserved between the various organisms (11, 12), which suggests the positively charged residue is important for YidC function. Fig. 1B shows a sequence alignment of YidC proteins in E. coli, S. mutans, B. halodurans, and B. subtilis and the sequence of the A. thaliana chloroplasts Alb3 protein. The sequences show the strictly conserved positively charged residue in TM1 (corresponding to TM2 in E. coli YidC) and the location of the N-terminal (CH1) and the C-terminal (CH2) helices of the helical hairpin structure in the cytoplasmic loop 1 of YidC homologs. Although the conserved arginine is important for the B. subtilis SpoIIIJ, it appeared that the arginine was not important for the E. coli YidC because a quintuple serine mutant (changing residues 366 –370 to serine residues) could rescue the growth of the YidC depletion strain and promoted the insertion of the procoat protein (15). To further examine the importance of the arginine at position 366 of the E. coli YidC, we mutated this residue and tested the activity of the YidC mutant (Fig. 2). First, we tested the ability of various YidC mutants to complement JS7131, the YidC depletion strain. JS7131 has the chromosomal copy of yidC inactivated and another copy of the gene introduced into the chromosome under the control of the araBAD promoter (22). Growth of JS7131 is arabinose-dependent because YidC, which is essential for cell growth, is expressed when the cells are grown in LB medium with arabinose, but it is not expressed when grown in LB medium with glucose. We cloned the YidC arginine mutants into pACYC184 under the control of the endogenous yidC promoter, as described previously (7), and we investigated whether the mutated YidC proteins could complement the growth defect of JS7131 when the chromosomal YidC was depleted. The overnight cultures of JS7131 bearing the respective YidC arginine 366 mutants were back-diluted 1:100 and grown in LB media for 3 h at 37 °C. The cultures were then serially diluted and spotted on LB agar plates supplemented with either arabinose or glucose. Fig. 2A shows that all of the VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 51 • DECEMBER 19, 2014

Downloaded from http://www.jbc.org/ at AGA KHAN UNIV MED COLL on March 6, 2015



washed twice with LB and then resuspended in LB containing glucose and chloramphenicol and grown for 3 h. Cells (1 ml) were pelleted, washed with PBS, and resuspended in lysis buffer. The samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE using a 10% polyacrylamide gel and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. Polyclonal antiserum against E. coli YidC and S. mutans YidC2 was generated against C-terminal peptides. The antibody against S. mutans YidC2 was a gift from Jeanine Brady. Antibody produced against a C-terminal peptide from Pisum sativum Alb3, which reacts with A. thaliana Alb3, was a gift from Ralph Henry.

Strictly Conserved Positive Charge among YidC Homologs

Downloaded from http://www.jbc.org/ at AGA KHAN UNIV MED COLL on March 6, 2015

FIGURE 1. Crystal structure of B. halodurans YidC2 highlighting the conserved positive charge in the hydrophilic groove. A, ribbon representation of the structure of the B. halodurans YidC2. The conserved positively charged Arg-72 (corresponding to Arg-366 in E. coli YidC) is highlighted in red and is located near the top of the hydrophilic groove. B, sequence alignment between YidC homologs in E. coli (Ec), S. mutans (Sm), B. halodurans (Bh), B. subtilis (Bs), and A. thaliana (At). The conserved positively charged residue in TM1 (corresponding to TM2 in the E. coli YidC) that is essential for function of the B. subtilis SpoIIIJ (YidC1) is highlighted in gray. CH1 and CH2 correspond to the N- and C-terminal amino acid sequences that make up the helical hairpin structure. C, YidC substrate constructs used in this study (for details see “Experimental Procedures”), and D, topology of the substrates Pf3-23Lep, PC-Lep, and PreCyoA-N-P2. The red arrows highlight the cleavage site for signal peptidases.

mutants fully complemented the YidC depletion strain (see plates with glucose) with the exception of the glutamic and aspartic acid substitution mutants. DECEMBER 19, 2014 • VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 51

To confirm that the activity of YidC was truly unimpaired, we examined whether the YidC mutants were functional for the membrane insertion of 2 YidC-dependent proteins. First, JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

35659

Strictly Conserved Positive Charge among YidC Homologs

we analyzed the model YidC-dependent protein Pf3-23Lep (see Fig. 1, C and D) that has the leader peptidase (Lep) residues 23 to 323 fused after the TM segment of the Pf3 coat; an Arg was placed at the C terminus of TM2 of Lep to prevent the translocation of Lep TM2 (23). Translocation of the N-tail of Pf323Lep can be monitored using proteinase K digestion (Fig. 2B, left panel). When the wild-type YidC was present in the YidC depletion strain, the full-length protein (indicated by P in Fig. 2B, left panel) was inserted, and the N-terminal tail of Pf323Lep was digested by externally added proteinase K and converted to a smaller protease-resistant band (indicated by F in Fig. 2B, left panel) under YidC depletion conditions. In contrast, when an empty vector was present in JS7131, Pf3-23Lep was not digested by proteinase K, indicating that it was not inserted under YidC depletion conditions. This shows the protein absolutely requires YidC for membrane protein insertion.

35660 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

When YidC R366A or R366L was expressed under chromosomal YidC depletion conditions, Pf3-23Lep was inserted, which illustrates that these mutants facilitate insertion. However, the negatively charged YidC366D and R366E mutants were unable to facilitate insertion of the Pf3-23Lep protein. Similar results for the R366A and R366L mutants were observed with the YidC-dependent Procoat-Lep (PC-Lep) protein (24). PC-Lep corresponds to procoat with its C-terminal cytoplasmic region extended by 101 amino acids of the periplasmic domain of Lep (see Fig. 1, C and D) (25). PC-Lep is cleaved by signal peptidase (also known as leader peptidase, Lep) and converted to the mature form (denoted by C in Fig. 2B, right panel), termed coat-Lep during membrane insertion (Fig. 2B, top right panel). Membrane insertion of PC-Lep was observed when either the E. coli YidC R366A or R366L mutant was present under YidC depletion conditions indicating that VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 51 • DECEMBER 19, 2014

Downloaded from http://www.jbc.org/ at AGA KHAN UNIV MED COLL on March 6, 2015

FIGURE 2. Arginine 366 in the E. coli YidC is dispensable for function. A, complementation assay to test the importance of Arg-366 for E. coli YidC function. Arg-366 within the E. coli YidC was mutated to Ala, Cys, Asp, Glu, Lys, and Leu in pACYC184. The pACYC184-encoded YidC mutants were transformed and expressed in E. coli JS7131 under YidC depletion conditions for 3 h. Expression of the plasmid-encoded YidC mutants was under the endogenous yidC promoter. Serial dilutions of the cultures were spotted and incubated under wild-type YidC expression conditions (top panels) and depletion conditions (lower panels), respectively. Plasmid-encoded wild-type YidC was also expressed, as a positive control, to show it was capable of supporting growth of the cell when chromosomal YidC was depleted. B, E. coli YidC neutral and negatively charged mutants at 366 were tested for their ability to promote the insertion of Pf3-23Lep and PC-Lep. JS7131 encoding the pACYC184-YidC wild-type, mutants, or the pACYC184 empty vector were grown for 3 h under YidC expression (0.2% arabinose) or YidC depletion conditions (0.2% glucose). The respective strains were co-transformed with pMS119 encoding Pf3-23Lep or PC-Lep. Expression of the YidC substrate was induced by the addition of 1 mM isopropyl ␤-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside, and the cells were labeled with [35S]methionine for 1 min. Protease accessibility assay (left panels) was used to monitor translocation of the N-tail of Pf3-23Lep. After [35S] labeling, the cells were converted to spheroplasts, and a portion was treated with proteinase K (P.K.), as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Signal peptide processing (right panels) was employed to measure membrane insertion of PC-Lep. After labeling with [35S]methionine for 1 min, the cells were precipitated with TCA and analyzed as described under “Experimental Procedures.” The percent translocation of Pf3-23Lep and PC-Lep was quantified as described under “Experimental Procedures.” P represents Pf3-23Lep protein; F denotes the proteinase K fragment; PC represents PC-Lep; C denotes C-Lep protein generated by SP1 cleavage. C, Western blot to examine expression and stability of the E. coli YidC mutants using antiserum against a C-terminal peptide of EcYidC. The top band is an unrelated 70-kDa protein recognized by our antiserum. P.K., proteinase K.

Strictly Conserved Positive Charge among YidC Homologs

DECEMBER 19, 2014 • VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 51

cessed to the mature form and digested by proteinase K when YidC is expressed from the chromosome (⫹ arabinose). A deletion of the C1 loop (YidC ⌬C1) or the C-terminal portion of the helical hairpin structure (⌬CH2) of YidC only marginally inhibited membrane insertion of preCyoA-N-P2 in contrast to the substrates Pf3-23Lep and PC-Lep. Western blot analysis confirms that all of the E. coli YidC helical hairpin deletion mutants were stably expressed (Fig. 3D). Taken together, this deletion analysis supports the idea that the C-terminal half of the cytoplasmic hairpin structure is important for the activity of YidC. One possible explanation for the difference in results, as compared with Ref. 15, is that in this study we deplete YidC prior to plating the cells and check complementation using a spot assay, as compared with the heavy streak reported earlier. Next, we tested whether the precise sequence of the helical hairpin region is important for YidC function by alanine scanning. YidC Ala-1, Ala-2, Ala-3, and Ala-4 constructs were made where 4 –5 alanines were introduced consecutively from 399 to 402, 403 to 406, 407 to 410, and 411 to 415, respectively. Fig. 3A shows that each of the YidC Ala mutants was able to rescue the YidC depletion strain grown under glucose conditions. Furthermore, the Ala mutants were stably expressed (Fig. 3D) and were fully capable of inserting Pf3-23Lep and PC-Lep into the membrane (Fig. 3B). The Ala scanning results demonstrate that although the helical hairpin structure is important for E. coli YidC function, the precise sequence is not. Positively Charged Residue at Position 73 in the S. mutans YidC2 Is Critical for Its Function—We analyzed YidC2 from S. mutans to investigate whether other bacterial YidC homologs require the conserved positively charged residue for YidC function. The Gram-positive S. mutans has two YidC paralogs (YidC1 and YidC2) that play a role in membrane protein insertion (27). Previously, we showed that S. mutans 247YidC2 can complement the E. coli YidC depletion strain and function to insert proteins into the inner membrane of E. coli (7). 247YidC2 consists of residues 1–247 of the E. coli YidC fused to residues 25–310 of S. mutans YidC2 containing the conserved arginine at position 73 (Fig. 4D). To test the importance of the conserved arginine for the S. mutans YidC2 function, we made a number of mutations within 247YidC2 and examined whether the YidC homolog can rescue the growth of the E. coli YidC depletion strain JS7131. The cultures expressing the 247YidC2 arginine mutants were spotted on LB agar plates with or without arabinose (Fig. 4A). The results show that YidC with Arg substituted with Ala, Leu, Glu, Gln, Asp, Met, Ile, Cys, or Ser could not complement the JS7131 strain when the chromosome-encoded YidC was depleted (Fig. 4A, Glc). Only the positively charged Lys residue substituted at position 73 complemented the YidC depletion strain (plates grown with glucose), indicating the positively charged residue is critical for the function of the S. mutans 247YidC2. To test whether the various mutants were impaired in membrane insertion, we examined the insertion of the YidC substrates Pf3-23Lep and PC-Lep (Fig. 4B). As can be seen, the 247YidC2 mutants R73Q and R73E were defective for the insertion of Pf3-23Lep into the membrane. We confirmed that the inability of the mutants to complement the YidC depletion was not due to lack of expression. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

35661

Downloaded from http://www.jbc.org/ at AGA KHAN UNIV MED COLL on March 6, 2015

these YidC arginine mutants are functional. When YidC R366E or R366D was present, membrane insertion of PC-Lep was partially defective. As a negative control, we confirmed that PCLep accumulated in the precursor form (denoted by PC in Fig. 2B, right panel) in the cytoplasm under YidC depletion conditions when an empty plasmid was present in JS7131. We also showed by Western blot analysis that all of the YidC mutants were expressed and stable (Fig. 2C). The wild-type and Arg-366 YidC mutant proteins were readily detected on the Western blot. No band is seen at the respective position for the empty vector. The upper band on the Western blots, which is a nonspecific band recognized by our antibody, serves as a loading control. The above complementation and membrane insertion results show that there are differences between the importance of the conserved arginine for the B. subtilis and E. coli YidC proteins because YidC requires a positively charged residue for its function in B. subtilis but not in E. coli. C-terminal Half of the Predicted Hairpin Region of the E. coli YidC Is Important for Function—Previously, we reported that a deletion of the entire cytoplasmic loop 1 (residues 371– 416) did not impair the activity of the E. coli YidC (15). In this published study, we showed that growth of JS7131 (the YidC depletion strain) containing pACYC184 YidC ⌬C1 was observed when colonies were streaked out on an agar plate under glucose conditions. However, we wanted to reinvestigate the importance of the C1 region given the fact that this region forms a hairpin structure and is important for YidC function in B. subtilis (21). To probe the function of the hairpin region in cytoplasmic loop 1 of the YidC protein, we made several deletions as follows: ⌬371– 416 to delete the entire cytoplasmic loop 1 (⌬C1); ⌬389 –398 to delete the N-terminal portion of the hairpin structure (⌬CH1); and ⌬399 – 415 to delete the C-terminal region of the hairpin structure (⌬CH2). The deletion of the entire C1 loop inactivated the E. coli YidC because it did not complement the JS7131 strain under YidC depletion conditions (Fig. 3A, LB ⫹ glucose) and blocked membrane insertion of Pf3-23Lep and Procoat-Lep (Fig. 3B). Similarly, YidC⌬CH2 with the C-terminal part of the helical hairpin structure deleted was not functional in rescuing JS7131 under YidC depletion conditions (Fig. 3A), and it was highly defective in membrane insertion of the YidC substrates Pf3-23Lep and PC-Lep (Fig. 3B). Although the YidC ⌬CH1 mutant was fully capable of rescuing the YidC depletion strain grown in glucose, it was slightly impaired in its ability to promote membrane insertion of Pf323Lep and PC-Lep. The helical hairpin structure appeared less important for membrane insertion using a substrate derived from subunit 2 of the cytochrome bo oxidase, which is synthesized as a precursor (preCyoA) with a cleavable leader peptide and is cleaved by lipoprotein signal peptidase following insertion into the inner membrane (Fig. 1, C and D). In this study, we studied the insertion of the N-terminal domain of preCyoA, which inserts by the YidC only pathway (26) and contains a Lep-P2 domain after the first TM segment such that we can immunoprecipitate the protein. preCyoA-N-P2 accumulates in its precursor form in JS7131 and is not digested by externally added proteinase K when grown under chromosomal YidC depletion conditions (Fig. 3C, empty plasmid control). However, preCyoA-P2 is pro-

Strictly Conserved Positive Charge among YidC Homologs

All the S. mutans 247YidC2 mutants were stably expressed (Fig. 4C). Remarkably, 247YidC2 R73Q with a neutral residue substituted for the arginine still mediated the insertion of PCLep insertion, although R73E with a negatively charged residue was slightly defective in mediating insertion of PC-Lep even though they did not complement growth. Positively Charged Residue at Position 152 in the A. thaliana Alb3 Is Not Critical for Its Function—Because the functional importance of the conserved positively charged resi-

35662 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

due differed for the tested Gram-negative and Gram-positive homologs, we wanted to extend our analysis to an organellar YidC homolog. Therefore, we investigated the functional importance of the positively charged residue at position 152 of the chloroplast A. thaliana Alb3. We used the H1Alb3 construct because it could complement the E. coli YidC depletion strain JS7131 (7). H1Alb3 contains the first 57 amino acids of E. coli YidC fused to amino acids 59 – 462 of Alb3 via a valine linker (Fig. 5D). The A. thaliana Alb3 homVOLUME 289 • NUMBER 51 • DECEMBER 19, 2014

Downloaded from http://www.jbc.org/ at AGA KHAN UNIV MED COLL on March 6, 2015

FIGURE 3. C-terminal region of the helix hairpin region is important for the function of the E. coli YidC, but its precise sequence is not. A, complementation assay to examine the role of the helical hairpin structure for YidC function. The YidC depletion strain JS7131 was transformed with pACYC184-encoding YidC Ala-1, Ala-2, Ala-3, Ala-4, ⌬371– 416 (⌬C1), ⌬389 –398 (⌬CH1), and ⌬399 – 415 (⌬CH2) mutants, and a spot test was used to examine complementation, as described in Fig. 2A. B, YidC hairpin mutants were tested for their ability to insert Pf3-23Lep and PC-Lep. JS7131 bearing pACYC184 encoding YidC ⌬C1, ⌬CH1, ⌬CH2, Ala-1, Ala-2, Ala-3, or Ala-4 was transformed with either pMS119 Pf3-23Lep or PC-Lep. Expression of the YidC substrate, labeling, and membrane insertion was performed as described in Fig. 2B. Left panel shows protease mapping of Pf3-23Lep. Right panel shows signal peptide processing of PC-Lep. P represents Pf3-23Lep protein; F denotes the proteinase K fragment; PC represents PC-Lep; C denotes C-Lep protein generated by SP1 cleavage. C, YidC mutants with deletions in the C1 loop were tested for their ability to insert preCyoA-N-P2, as described in 2B. P corresponds to PreCyoA-N-P2; C denotes the CyoA-N-P2 produced by SP1 cleavage; F corresponds to the proteinase K fragment of CyoA-N-P2. D, Western blotting to detect expression of the E. coli YidC mutants. The percent translocation of Pf3-23Lep, PC-Lep, and PreCyoA-N-P2 was quantified as described under “Experimental Procedures.” P.K., proteinase K.

Strictly Conserved Positive Charge among YidC Homologs

olog contains a lysine instead of the conserved arginine residue in TM1. The critical nature of Lys-152 of the A. thaliana Alb3 was examined by testing various substitution mutants of this residue in H1Alb3 and assaying the ability of these mutants to complement the YidC depletion strain (Fig. 5A). The results show that H1Alb3 with Lys-152 substituted with a glutamine or an arginine residue could rescue the growth defect of YidC depletion, as indicated by the growth under glucose conditions (Fig. 5A, Glc). In addition, membrane insertion of Pf3-23Lep and Procoat-Lep was efficient when the H1Alb3 K152Q was expressed under YidC depletion conditions (Fig. 5B). This shows that a positively charged residue is not strictly required for the H1Alb3. When a negatively charged residue was substituted for the positively charged residue in the hydrophilic groove, membrane insertion of Pf3-23Lep was affected, and the insertion of Procoat-Lep was inhibited as was observed with E. coli YidC and S. mutans 247YidC2. The results with the Alb3 homolog again show there are differing roles for the strictly conserved positively charged residues among the YidC homologs, as well as the importance of this positive charge for DECEMBER 19, 2014 • VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 51

YidC family proteins to promote membrane insertion of different substrates. Mechanistic Studies to Uncover the Role of the Positive Charge in the S. mutans 247YidC2 and E. coli YidC Protein—The results we obtained with S. mutans 247YidC2 and the substrate protein Pf3-23Lep are consistent with the proposal of Kumazaki et al. (21) that the positively charged residue in the hydrophilic groove plays an important role for the insertion of the N-tail of the substrate by attracting the negatively charged residues of the substrate into the groove. If this is generally the case, the removal of the two negatively charged residues from the N-tail should inhibit insertion. We tested this proposal by mutating the Pf3-23Lep tail region by changing either the aspartic acid residue at position 7 or the aspartic acid residue at 18 or both acidic residues to asparagines. Fig. 6A (left panel) shows that the aspartic acid at position 18 is important for S. mutans YidC2-mediated membrane insertion as Pf323Lep18N and Pf3-23Lep7N18N were hindered in membrane insertion. Surprisingly, the negatively charged residue at position 7 was not important for membrane insertion. NevertheJOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

35663

Downloaded from http://www.jbc.org/ at AGA KHAN UNIV MED COLL on March 6, 2015

FIGURE 4. Positively charged residue at position 73 in the S. mutans YidC2 is critical for function. A, complementation assay to elucidate the importance of the conserved arginine for S. mutans 247YidC2 function. JS7131 bearing pACYC184 possessing the S. mutans 247YidC2 WT or mutants was tested for complementation using the spot test, as described in Fig. 2A. 247YidC2 was constructed by fusing residues 1–247 of the E. coli YidC to residues 25–310 of S. mutans YidC. Mutants studied are WT (73R), R73A, R73L, R73E, R73Q, R73D, R73M, R73I, R73K, R73C, and R73S. B, wild-type and representative mutants of 247YidC2, R73Q, and R73E were tested for their ability to insert Pf3-23Lep and PC-Lep into the membrane. Expression of YidC substrates, [35S] labeling, protease accessibility of Pf3-23Lep (left panels), and signal peptide cleavage of PC-Lep (right panels) was performed, as described in Fig. 2B. The percent translocation of Pf3-23Lep and PC-Lep was quantified as described under “Experimental Procedures.” P represents Pf3-23Lep protein; F denotes the proteinase K fragment; PC represents PC-Lep; C denotes C-Lep protein generated by SP1 cleavage. C, Western blot to examine expression levels of wild-type and 247YidC2 mutants using antibodies prepared against a C-terminal peptide of the S. mutans YidC2. D, schematic of S. mutans 247YidC2. It contains residues 1–247 of the E. coli YidC2 fused to residues 25–310 of S. mutans YidC2. P.K., proteinase K.

Strictly Conserved Positive Charge among YidC Homologs

less, the results confirm that a negatively charged residue in the substrate N-tail contributes to the insertion process. In contrast, the E. coli YidC was able to promote membrane insertion of Pf3-23Lep even without any negatively charged residues present in the N-tail, consistent with E. coli YidC not needing the positive charge in hydrophilic groove of YidC. Translocation of the N-tail was efficient when the negatively charged residue was substituted with an asparaginyl residue at either position 7 or 18 or at both positions (Fig. 6A, right panel). As a control, we confirmed that 7N18N Pf3-23Lep with a neutral N-tail requires YidC for insertion. Membrane translocation of the N-tail of 7N18N Pf3-23Lep was blocked when YidC was depleted (Fig. 6B). The results demonstrate that insertion of the N-tail does not depend on the attraction of the positively charged arginine 366 in the hydrophilic cavity of the E. coli YidC with the negatively charged residues in the N-tail of the substrate. For all tested YidC homologs, changing the positively charged residue in the hydrophilic groove to a negatively charged residue significantly impacted the YidC function. The negatively charged mutants did not complement the growth defect of the YidC depletion strain nor did R366E facilitate the

35664 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

membrane insertion of Pf3-23Lep. One explanation for these results is that there is an electrostatic repulsion between the negatively charged residue in the N-tail and the negatively charged residue in the hydrophilic cavity of the YidC mutant. If this explanation is correct, the Pf3-23Lep lacking a negatively charged residue in the N-tail should be inserted efficiently by the negatively charged homologs. We tested this possibility with the E. coli YidC. Fig. 6C shows that YidC R366E did not facilitate the insertion of the uncharged Pf3-23Lep7N18N tail substrate. This result is not entirely consistent with the electrostatic repulsion model and suggests that a negative charged residue at 366 is inhibiting the function of YidC by some other mechanism.

DISCUSSION In this report, we show that the conserved positively charged residue within the hydrophilic groove is critical for the Grampositive S. mutans YidC2 to function in E. coli similar to the result recently reported for B. subtilis YidC1 (21). Conversely, we show that the positively charged residue is not essential for the function of the E. coli YidC and is not required for the chloroplast Alb3 to function in complementing the growth of the VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 51 • DECEMBER 19, 2014

Downloaded from http://www.jbc.org/ at AGA KHAN UNIV MED COLL on March 6, 2015

FIGURE 5. Positively charged residue at 152 in the A. thaliana Alb3 is not critical for function. A, complementation assay to determine the importance of the strictly conserved positively charged residue. The H1Alb3 WT, K152R, K152Q, and K152E mutants were tested for their ability to complement the YidC depletion strain using the spot test, as described in Fig. 2A. H1Alb3 contains the first 57 amino acids of E. coli YidC fused to residues 59 – 462 of Alb3. B, WT H1Alb3, K152Q and K152E were tested for their ability to insert Pf3-23Lep and PC-Lep using protease mapping (left panel) and signal peptide cleavage (right panel), respectively. The percent translocation of Pf3-23Lep and PC-Lep was quantified as described under “Experimental Procedures.” P represents Pf3-23Lep protein; F denotes the proteinase K fragment; PC represents PC-Lep; C denotes C-Lep protein generated by SP1 cleavage. C, Western blotting to examine expression of the wild-type and H1Alb3 mutants using antibodies generated against a C-terminal peptide from P. sativum Alb3. The top band is an unrelated band seen in our Western blots. The pMS lane refers to H1Alb3 overexpressed in pMS119 to confirm that the band we are examining is indeed H1Alb3. D, schematic of H1Alb3. It contains the first 57 amino acids of E. coli YidC, a linker valine residue, and residues 59 – 462 of Alb3. P.K., proteinase K.

Strictly Conserved Positive Charge among YidC Homologs

E. coli YidC depletion strain. Whether all YidC homologs in Gram-positive bacteria will generally require a positively charged residue, while YidC proteins in Gram-negative bacteria and Alb3 homologs in the plant chloroplasts do not, will be tested in the future. The conserved arginine in Oxa1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been investigated in some detail (28). Mutations of the arginine at position 140 to Ala and Glu led to a cold-sensitive growth behavior. The R140A mutant showed reduced activity for N-tail translocation from the matrix to the intermembrane space of the Cox2 precursor protein. This result is in contrast to the E. coli R366A YidC, which was fully functional for membrane insertion of all tested substrates. Our results addressing the charge preference of this amino acid residue are not due to the fact that YidC proteins in Gramnegative bacteria have an extra TM segment and a large periplasmic domain when compared with Gram-positive YidC proteins. In our study, the S. mutans YidC has amino acids 1–247 of the E. coli YidC fused to amino acids 25–310 of S. mutans YidC. Thus, it has the first TM segment and most of the periplasmic domains of the E. coli YidC appended to it, yet it still required the strictly conserved positively charged residue. Moreover, the chloroplast H1Alb3, which did not require the positively charged residue for activity, behaved exactly like the E. coli YidC despite its missing the large periplasmic domain. To analyze and compare the functionality of the various YidC homologs, we used the single-span Pf3-Lep and the doublespanning Procoat-Lep substrates (Fig. 1, C and D). Both substrates have negatively charged residues in the periplasmic domain that might electrostatically interact with the conserved positively charged residue in the groove of YidC before the DECEMBER 19, 2014 • VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 51

translocation step (21). Interestingly, we found the importance of the conserved positively charged residue depends on the properties of the YidC substrate. Although the positive charge in the S. mutans YidC2 is essential for translocation of the N-tail of the single-span Pf3-23Lep, it is not critical for insertion of the M13 PC-Lep. PC-Lep was still inserted efficiently by the S. mutans YidC possessing a neutral residue substituted for the conserved arginine, demonstrating that a positive charge in the groove is important for the S. mutans YidC to insert only specific membrane proteins. One possible explanation why the positively charged residue may be less important for the M13 PC-Lep is that it inserts into the membrane with two hydrophobic domains simultaneously, driving membrane insertion as a helical hairpin (29). The hydrophobic interactions between PC-Lep and YidC, as well as the driving force of the membrane electrochemical potential, may be sufficient for translocation of the periplasmic loop of PC-Lep. In contrast, the hydrophobic driving force for Pf323Lep is insufficient and therefore needs the help of the positive charge in the S. mutans YidC to attract the negative charges of the substrate peptide chain into the hydrophilic cavity for membrane translocation. Remarkably, we found that a negatively charged residue substituted for the strictly conserved and positively charged residue inactivated YidC for all of the tested YidC homologs. When the negative charge was substituted for the positive charge in the hydrophilic groove, the E. coli YidC, S. mutans 247YidC2, and A. thaliana H1Alb3 failed to rescue the cell growth and to promote the insertion of the single-span Pf3-23Lep protein under YidC depletion conditions. One possibility for the lack of insertion of the Pf3-23Lep substrate was due to the electrostatic JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

35665

Downloaded from http://www.jbc.org/ at AGA KHAN UNIV MED COLL on March 6, 2015

FIGURE 6. Test of the electrostatic attraction model for how YidC facilitates translocation of the N-tail of Pf3–23Lep across the membrane. The negatively charged residue in the N-tail is important for membrane insertion mediated by S. mutans 247YidC2 but not by the E. coli YidC. A, E. coli YidC (right panel) or S. mutans YidC2 (left panel) was tested for their ability to insert Pf3-23Lep WT, Pf3-23Lep7N, Pf3-23Lep18N, and Pf3-23Lep7N18N. JS7131 bearing pACYC184 encoding E. coli YidC or S. mutans 247YidC2 was transformed with pMS119 encoding Pf3-23Lep proteins. Expression of the Pf3-23Lep mutants, labeling, and membrane insertion was performed as described in Fig. 2B. B, YidC is required for membrane insertion of Pf3-23Lep7N18N. JS7131 expressing YidC or depleted for YidC (⫺) was analyzed for N-tail translocation. P represents Pf3-23Lep protein; F denotes the proteinase K fragment. C, R366E YidC is defective in translocating the N-tail of Pf3-23Lep lacking negatively charged residues. JS7131 bearing pACYC184 encoding E. coli YidC R366E was transformed with pMS119 encoding Pf3-23Lep7N18N and analyzed for N-tail translocation, as described in Fig. 2B. The percent translocation of Pf3-23Lep and PC-Lep was quantified as described under “Experimental Procedures.” P.K., proteinase K.

Strictly Conserved Positive Charge among YidC Homologs

35666 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

eral, the Gram-positive bacterial homologs require the positively charged residue, and the Gram-negative bacterial and chloroplasts Alb3 homologs do not. However, further analysis with more proteins needs to be performed because very few YidC proteins have been studied so far. Additionally, the C-terminal half of the helical hairpin of the E. coli YidC is important for YidC activity. Future studies will need to elucidate the precise function of this hairpin region in the membrane insertion pathway of YidC-dependent proteins. REFERENCES 1. Wang, P., and Dalbey, R. E. (2011) Inserting membrane proteins: the YidC/Oxa1/Alb3 machinery in bacteria, mitochondria, and chloroplasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1808, 866 – 875 2. Kiefer, D., and Kuhn, A. (2007) YidC as an essential and multifunctional component in membrane protein assembly. Int. Rev. Cytol. 259, 113–138 3. Dalbey, R. E., Kuhn, A., Zhu, L., and Kiefer, D. (2014) The membrane insertase YidC. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843, 1489 –1496 4. Scotti, P. A., Urbanus, M. L., Brunner, J., de Gier, J. W., von Heijne, G., van der Does, C., Driessen, A. J., Oudega, B., and Luirink, J. (2000) YidC, the Escherichia coli homologue of mitochondrial Oxa1p, is a component of the Sec translocase. EMBO J. 19, 542–549 5. Serek, J., Bauer-Manz, G., Struhalla, G., van den Berg, L., Kiefer, D., Dalbey, R. E., and Kuhn, A. (2004) Escherichia coli YidC is a membrane insertase for Sec-independent proteins. EMBO J. 23, 294 –301 6. van der Laan, M., Bechtluft, P., Kol, S., Nouwen, N., and Driessen, A. J. (2004) F1F0 ATP synthase subunit c is a substrate of the novel YidC pathway for membrane protein biogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 165, 213–222 7. Jiang, F., Yi, L., Moore, M., Chen, M., Rohl, T., Van Wijk, K. J., De Gier, J. W., Henry, R., and Dalbey, R. E. (2002) Chloroplast YidC homolog Albino3 can functionally complement the bacterial YidC depletion strain and promote membrane insertion of both bacterial and chloroplast thylakoid proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 19281–19288 8. van Bloois, E., Nagamori, S., Koningstein, G., Ullers, R. S., and Preuss, M. (2005) The Sec-independent function of Escherichia coli YidC is evolutionary-conserved and essential. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 12996 –13003 9. Dong, Y., Palmer, S. R., Hasona, A., Nagamori, S., Kaback, H. R., Dalbey, R. E., and Brady, L. J. (2008) Functional overlap but lack of complete cross-complementation of Streptococcus mutans and Escherichia coli YidC orthologs. J. Bacteriol. 190, 2458 –2469 10. Preuss, M., Ott, M., Funes, S., Luirink, J., and Herrmann, J. M. (2005) Evolution of mitochondrial oxa proteins from bacterial YidC. Inherited and acquired functions of a conserved protein insertion machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 13004 –13011 11. Yen, M. R., Harley, K. T., Tseng, Y. H., and Saier, M. H., Jr. (2001) Phylogenetic and structural analyses of the oxa1 family of protein translocases. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 204, 223–231 12. Luirink, J., Samuelsson, T., and de Gier, J. W. (2001) YidC/Oxa1p/Alb3: evolutionarily conserved mediators of membrane protein assembly. FEBS Lett. 501, 1–5 13. Funes, S., Kauff, F., van der Sluis, E. O., Ott, M., and Herrmann, J. M. (2011) Evolution of YidC/Oxa1/Alb3 insertases: three independent gene duplications followed by functional specialization in bacteria, mitochondria, and chloroplasts. Biol. Chem. 392, 13–19 14. Sa¨a¨f, A., Monne´, M., de Gier, J. W., and von Heijne, G. (1998) Membrane topology of the 60-kDa Oxa1p homologue from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30415–30418 15. Jiang, F., Chen, M., Yi, L., de Gier, J. W., Kuhn, A., and Dalbey, R. E. (2003) Defining the regions of Escherichia coli YidC that contribute to activity. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 48965– 48972 16. Ravaud, S., Stjepanovic, G., Wild, K., and Sinning, I. (2008) The crystal structure of the periplasmic domain of the Escherichia coli membrane protein insertase YidC contains a substrate binding cleft. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 9350 –9358 17. Oliver, D. C., and Paetzel, M. (2008) Crystal structure of the major periplasmic domain of the bacterial membrane protein assembly facilita-

VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 51 • DECEMBER 19, 2014

Downloaded from http://www.jbc.org/ at AGA KHAN UNIV MED COLL on March 6, 2015

repulsion between the negative charge in the groove and the negative charges that are commonly found in the translocated regions of many YidC substrates. However, we found that the N-tail of the Pf3-23Lep substrate was still not membrane-inserted by YidC R366E when the tail lacked negative charges (Fig. 6C). Therefore, the introduction of the negatively charged residues into the hydrophilic cavity causes some other perturbation that inactivates the YidC mutant. It should be noted that it is unlikely that the mutation causes a big structural change as the negative charge in the groove did not affect the stability of the YidC homologs (Figs. 2C, 4C, and 5C). Also, the negatively charged mutants of 247YidC2 and H1Alb3 could insert PCLep, albeit less efficiently than the wild-type version of these proteins (Figs. 4B, and 5B). Mechanistically, the positively charged residue in the S. mutans 247YidC2 protein could play a role in facilitating the translocation of the N-tail of Pf3-23Lep most likely by attracting the negatively charged residue. We found that the negatively charged residue at position 18 in the N-tail of Pf3-23Lep is important for translocation (Fig. 6A, left panel), consistent with the electrostatic interaction model put forward by Kumazaki and co-workers (21). However, the position of the negative charge within the N-tail of the substrate is important as substitution of the aspartic acid at position 7 to a neutral residue did not perturb translocation at all. For the E. coli YidC, we found that the positive charge in the groove can be substituted with a neutral residue without an effect on its ability to promote membrane insertion, and we found that the negatively charged residues in the N-tail are not important for membrane insertion. This shows that the electrostatic attraction model does not apply for the E. coli YidC at least not for the Pf3-23Lep substrate. In the case of the E. coli YidC protein, the hydrophilic N-tail can be incorporated into the hydrophilic groove even without the assistance of the strictly conserved positive charge in the groove. It seems reasonable that the hydrophilic cavity would still provide a favorable environment for moving the N-tail lacking the negative charges into the membrane. A similar mechanism most likely is employed with the A. thaliana H1Alb3 to facilitate membrane insertion. We also explored the functional importance of the cytoplasmic helical hairpin structure located at the entrance of the hydrophilic groove of YidC. Although removal of the N-terminal half of this hairpin segment did not affect YidC’s ability to complement the YidC depletion strain, it did have a small effect on membrane insertion of Pf3-23Lep and Procoat-Lep. Deletion of the C-terminal region of the hairpin or deletion of the entire hairpin structure completely eliminated YidC’s ability to complement the YidC depletion strain. Similarly, these deletions strongly impacted membrane insertion of Pf3-23Lep and PC-Lep and to a lesser extent insertion of preCyoA-N-P2. These studies demonstrate the dynamic helical hairpin region (21, 30) is important for YidC activity. However, its precise sequence is not critical as shown by the results of the alanine scanning mutagenesis. In conclusion, our results show that the functional importance of the strictly conserved positively charged residue in YidC depends on the YidC homolog being examined. In gen-

Strictly Conserved Positive Charge among YidC Homologs

DECEMBER 19, 2014 • VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 51

tial dependence and Sec requirement. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34847–34852 25. Kuhn, A., Zhu, H. Y., and Dalbey, R. E. (1990) Efficient translocation of positively charged residues of M13 procoat protein across the membrane excludes electrophoresis as the primary force for membrane insertion. EMBO J. 9, 2385–2389 26. Celebi, N., Yi, L., Facey, S. J., Kuhn, A., and Dalbey, R. E. (2006) Membrane biogenesis of subunit II of cytochrome bo oxidase: contrasting requirements for insertion of N-terminal and C-terminal domains. J. Mol. Biol. 357, 1428 –1436 27. Hasona, A., Crowley, P. J., Levesque, C. M., Mair, R. W., Cvitkovitch, D. G., Bleiweis, A. S., and Brady, L. J. (2005) Streptococcal viability and diminished stress tolerance in mutants lacking the signal recognition particle pathway or YidC2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 17466 –17471 28. Lemaire, C., Guibet-Grandmougin, F., Angles, D., Dujardin, G., and Bonnefoy, N. (2004) A yeast mitochondrial membrane methyltransferaselike protein can compensate for oxa1 mutations. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 47464 – 47472 29. Eisenhawer, M., Cattarinussi, S., Kuhn, A., and Vogel, H. (2001) Fluorescence resonance energy transfer shows a close helix-helix distance in the transmembrane M13 procoat protein. Biochemistry 40, 12321–12328 30. Hennon, S. W., and Dalbey, R. E. (2014) Cross-linking-based flexibility and proximity relationships between the TM segments of the Escherichia coli YidC. Biochemistry 53, 3278 –3286

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

35667

Downloaded from http://www.jbc.org/ at AGA KHAN UNIV MED COLL on March 6, 2015

tor YidC. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 5208 –5216 18. Kohler, R., Boehringer, D., Greber, B., Bingel-Erlenmeyer, R., Collinson, I., Schaffitzel, C., and Ban, N. (2009) YidC and Oxa1 form dimeric insertion pores on the translating ribosome. Mol. Cell 34, 344 –353 19. Seitl, I., Wickles, S., Beckmann, R., Kuhn, A., and Kiefer, D. (2014) The C-terminal regions of YidC from Rhodopirellula baltica and Oceanicaulis alexandrii bind to ribosomes and partially substitute for SRP receptor function in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 91, 408 – 421 20. Kedrov, A., Sustarsic, M., de Keyzer, J., Caumanns, J. J., Wu, Z. C., and Driessen, A. J. (2013) Elucidating the native architecture of the YidC: ribosome complex. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 4112– 4124 21. Kumazaki, K., Chiba, S., Takemoto, M., Furukawa, A., Nishiyama, K., Sugano, Y., Mori, T., Dohmae, N., Hirata, K., Nakada-Nakura, Y., Maturana, A. D., Tanaka, Y., Mori, H., Sugita, Y., Arisaka, F., Ito, K., Ishitani, R., Tsukazaki, T., and Nureki, O. (2014) Structural basis for Sec-independent membrane protein insertion by YidC. Nature 509, 516 –520 22. Samuelson, J. C., Chen, M., Jiang, F., Mo¨ller, I., Wiedmann, M., Kuhn, A., Phillips, G. J., and Dalbey, R. E. (2000) YidC mediates membrane protein insertion in bacteria. Nature 406, 637– 641 23. Cao, G., and Dalbey, R. E. (1994) Translocation of N-terminal tails across the plasma membrane. EMBO J. 13, 4662– 4669 24. Samuelson, J. C., Jiang, F., Yi, L., Chen, M., and de Gier, J. W. (2001) Function of YidC for the insertion of M13 procoat protein in E. coli: translocation of mutants that show differences in their membrane poten-

Membrane Biology: The Role of the Strictly Conserved Positively Charged Residue Differs among the Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and Chloroplast YidC Homologs

J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289:35656-35667. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.595082 originally published online October 30, 2014

Access the most updated version of this article at doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.595082 Find articles, minireviews, Reflections and Classics on similar topics on the JBC Affinity Sites. Alerts: • When this article is cited • When a correction for this article is posted Click here to choose from all of JBC's e-mail alerts This article cites 30 references, 15 of which can be accessed free at http://www.jbc.org/content/289/51/35656.full.html#ref-list-1

Downloaded from http://www.jbc.org/ at AGA KHAN UNIV MED COLL on March 6, 2015

Yuanyuan Chen, Raunak Soman, Sri Karthika Shanmugam, Andreas Kuhn and Ross E. Dalbey

The role of the strictly conserved positively charged residue differs among the Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and chloroplast YidC homologs.

Recently, the structure of YidC2 from Bacillus halodurans revealed that the conserved positively charged residue within transmembrane segment one (at ...
2MB Sizes 0 Downloads 4 Views