The five-level model: a new approach body-composition research1’2 Zi-ifian
Wang,
Richard
ABSTRACT man
Jr. and
Body-composition
biology
position
N Pierson
that
levels
has and
three
research
areas:
organizational
B Heyms/leld
is a branch
interconnecting
their
Steven
rules,
of hu-
body-com-
Although
ofincreasing III, cellular;
each
level
biochemical and model is consistent provides
steady
a specified
or different for
creating
new
KEY
state Finally,
explicit
are distinct,
quantitative
the five-level
model
J C/in
Body
provides
and Nutr
composition,
body
a matrix reveals
suggests
describe subjects
0.732]
=
gaps
assessment.
state
not
only
levels
between
The
Another
of human
search. within
Nearly many
science
are touched
every medical
Information rapidly
emerging been
is now
with the
niques
involved.
to
The
biological growth, disease
no
methodology
are often
published.
category
includes
biological
most
body-composition
categories information,
has such
as
which are ofthe tech-
.1,71
i C/ui Nuir
information be satisfactorily 1992:56:
19-28.
in USA.
body
or different
are
mass,
and
The
and
we could
mass of clear
a subtle
no clear
approach
multicompartment
in extensive
reviews
observations
but
in published bodyofoverlap or omis-
find
building
Are
body lack
has
In fact,
con-
example: lean
components
sion
these
different
frequently For
compartments?
for body-composition
components
by neuexist
between
terminology.
fat-free
models
quan-
to body-
of previous
literature.
is the hypothesis
that
a third
central category of body-composition research exists that until now has not been adequately formulated: the levels of body composition
and
their
a comprehensive of five distinct level has clearly five levels
system:
and
rules.
ofhuman
body
levels of increasing defined components are I. atomic:
V. whole
following and
organizational
model
section
its associated
tures or organizational scribed. Important
(Fig
presents
composition
models
ofthe
paper,
and
the widely
and
fined
concept
ofa
steady
III, cellular:
a detailed
each Bwt.
IV. tissue-
next
of each
section
the
fea-
model as a whole are deto development of bodyare presented
appreciated ofbody
description
In the
of the related
equations state
presents consisting
I).
components. rules concepts
report
complexity in which that comprise total
II, molecular:
body
This
composition
but
in this never
composition
portion
formally
de-
is introduced.
lactation, I
would
appear a recent
emerging from body-composition included into the technical Printed
but
investigators
about
mass,
from
body
some
information
study ( 1 ) led us to appreciate a serious limitation of the field as it is now organized. We recognized that not all of the rapidly accumulating research could
components
is that
ofcomponents.
that
the relationships among Another example is prochemical compartments
many errors are evident and models because
The sys-
indicates
serious consequence: composition equations
level
continually
development, pregnancy. influence body composition. and
Most
or biological. and
Although
body-composition
the technical
encompass
classic
and neutron-activation analysis. principle or other characteristics
on the study ofhow aging. exercise, and Although
biology.
components
(TBW)/fat-free
as well.
questions same
mathematical
different
water
formulation
individual
body
(LBM)
The
is accumulating
methods.
groupings
re-
composition.
as technical
the many
y and
clinical
selected areas of exercise
ofhuman
categorized
for
informal
nutrition, components of body
100
>
and
composition
body-composition
dilution techniques based on a physical
science
knowledge
includes
classification proposed.
study
body
our
category new
tematic
to
is extending
technical
spans
of basic
on by the
information
The
composition
area
aspect of clinical specialties, and
related
and
ofthis
body
to be an active
body
are many
from elements estimated in vivo ( 1 ). This suggests that relationships
problem
fronted
Growing
study
total
composition
composition
continues
[eg,
(2). This
of body
defining
Introduction
there between
and body weight (Bwt) tron-activation analysis
definitions
1992:56:19-28.
For example, the relations
titative associations exist that describe compartments that are in equilibrium. vided by the reconstruction of human
lipid-free
important
nutritional
mass
exist
at the same
equations,
composition,
.1,n
ofa
associations
compartments
body
areas.
the concept
between
body-composition
WORDS
steady
define
in which
interval
ofhuman
research
compartments
to clearly
time
levels.
in the study
compoat pres-
physiological connections exist such that the and functions as a whole. The model also
the opportunity
composition over
its multiple
categories. that
in healthy
complexity are proposed: I, atomic: IV, tissue-system: and V. whole body.
and
biological models
measurement
techniques, and biological factors that influence body sition. In the first area, which is inadequately formulated ent, five levels II. molecular:
to organizing
© 1992 American
and Society
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/56/1/19/4715618 by Denise Hannibal user on 19 May 2018
From
the Obesity
Research
Center.
St Luke’s-Roosevelt
Columbia University. College of Physicians and Surgeons. NY. 2 Address reprint requests to Z-M Wang, Weight Control West I 14th Street, New York, NY 10025. Received September 17, 1991. Accepted for publication December 12. 1991. for Clinical
Nutrition
Hospital, New Unit.
York, 4I1
19
20
WANG
ET
AL
TABLE 1 Body composition Man
on the atomic
level (I) for the 70-kg
Amount
Percent
Element
Reference
ofbody
kg
Le1I (Atoalc)
FIG 1. The five levels of human body extracellular fluid and solids, respectively.
composition.
ECF and
43 16 7 1.8 1.0 0.58 0. 14 0. 14 0.1 0.095 0.019
61
Total
69.874
99.537
Information
related
fundamental
or elements.
building
Ofthe
blocks
gen, Bwt,
nitrogen, and one
mass
in the
elements
calcium, element, up
equation
body
are found
are atoms
Man
account > 60%
1) (2).
(Table
The
organs hydro-
ponents
for > 98% of of total body remaining
44
as defined
in the
atomic
level
of body
percent
mass
of Bwt
Elemental
(1)
analysis
ofall
elements
present
in amounts
of humans
is traditionally from content
carried
out
be measured directly in vivo: potassium by whole-body sodium, chlorine, and calcium by delayed--y neutron-
activation analysis
analysis (3); nitrogen by prompt-’y neutron-activation (1 , 3): and carbon by inelastic neutron scattering 98%
can
be
techniques. position
of Bwt
estimated The
analysis
P110/cell/ar
(II)
The
1 1 principal
from
water
possible in living search
>
is water,
major
lipid
components
(L);
protein
in present
(Pro):
use
mineral
(M):
2). Because some confusion exists in we now review the five chemical corn-
abundant
which
chemical
comprises
compound
60%
of Bwt
in the human in the
Reference
(2).
The
includes
atomic and
can
now
in
vivo,
level is the
be reconstructed largely is the
starting
elements
100 000 molecules
by
from
term
almost
protein
in body-composition
all compounds
humans. is to consider
all ofthese The
alternative
chemical
density
are
point
research
containing
usu-
nitrogen,
ranging
distribution
1% and
at 37 #{176}C (1, 5).
g/cm3
The primary storage form is found in the cytoplasm is in skeletal
2.2%
of their
muscle
respective
TABLE 2 Body composition Man*
acid. chemical used
on the molecular
of carbohydrate of most cells. and
wet
liver,
weights
The
is glyprim-
which
contain
in the
form
of
five
into
levels
Component
Amount 1cv
we
molecules
found in the and molecular It is neither compounds
human weight
Reference
useful
nor
Water Extracellular Intracellular Lipid Nonessential Essential Protein Mineral
(fat)
Total
Percent
of body
weight
%
18 24
26 34
12 1.5 10.6 3.7
17 2.1 15 5.3
69.8
99.4
individually
in body-composition in categories
level (II) for the 70-kg
(4).
elements
of body-corn-
for the
incorporated
compounds
of 1.34
G/i’cogen. cogen. which
neutron-activation
foundation
chemical compounds range in complexity
to deoxyribonucleic
to measure
and
in
propose.
that form body. These
(G) (Table categories.
in detail. The most
Protein. ally
The
(A):
selected tissues and organs. of most major elements
can now counting:
than
body Man
cipal
(1).
cadavers or in biopsy specimens In addition, the whole-body
that
2 (modified).
from simple amino acids to complex nucleoproteins. The most widely used representative stoichiometry for protein is CH 59N26O32S07 . with an average molecular weight of 2257.4
is
R is the residual
0.2%
Water.
2% of Bwt.
100 y, and
However, what
five-level
is conducive
exactly model
appropriate
or rules.
terconnecting ponents and
cellular,
tissue-system,
ing the
methods
studying
the
influences
components
(Fig
and
research the proportions associations
of measuring
and various
by in
for define
bodyhuman
that studies steady-state
includes
three
in-
of various cornamong the atomic,
whole-body factors
what
presented
levels:
components
of biological
term
is meant
structure to clearly
Body-composition
areas: studying their steady-state
the
it is unclear
body composition as a branch of human biology various body compartments and their quantitative
study-
in vivo; on
various
and levels
5).
Conclusion
as Bwt
=
molecular
direct
The
five-level
is body
X BV
volume
on the whole-body
that
in
model
developing relate
is intended or expand
method
2.057
=
of body
composition
composition
serves
in
broader
grows
methodologies
to the study
ofhuman
to be a foundation selected definitions this organizational view
of body-composition
from
a need and body
to organize
both
physiological composition.
the
concepts The
model
on which future studies can refine or equations. The five-level model capacity and also stimulates a research
as a whole.
C]
level, 12.1
References
indirect also
anthropometric
are
fat=4.95XBV-4.5OXBwt,andfat=0.7l5XBwtx stature2 (in m) (19, 20). Thus
research.
of in-
evaluating
presently
measurements
1 : 2) from
also
topic
molecular.
compart-
important
indirect ofdirectly
All ofthe
mea-
steady-state relationunknown components.
number
methods
the
shows and
are
rapidly
TBK(mmol)/68.
level
methods
relations
unknown
combining
fat is a major
on direct
skinfold
many
At present,
body
such
levels.
only
no practical
based
the table
Definition
imaging
indices and
a few direct
expand
be evaluated.
and
1) from
on
effects
6. The table demonstrates and
respectively
body-composition
follows:
-
I Biological
by com-
on the atomic
composition
be assessed
fat compartment indirect
I
ofbody-composition
that
from levels.
versely,
vol-
and
developed
whole-body on the cellular
resonance
composition.
methods.
can
are
mineral
(18).
tissue-system
can
there
been
determined
anthropometric
body
greatly
although
terest.
V
of subcutaneous
by magnetic
there
are only
methods
measured
by
(and plasma isotope-dilution
volumes
surernent techniques with the established ship between the directly measurable and Indirect
directly
estimated
osseous
fluid several
are concentrated
of body
and
(24).
circumferences,
neasuremnent
components
and
be directly
directly
and
presented principal
(4).
be directly
the
level,
ofhurnan
direct
lecular,
can
stature,
ofthe
scattering (10),
and
be estimated
can
used
areas
in Table elements
amples of the
portant
tomography
volume,
(23):
absorptiometry
level,
tissue
axial
nesses
and
rules
j
FIG 5. The three
(3):
activation
activation
can
level, extracellular determined by
puterized
body
TBW
techniques
(25). the tissue-system
visceral
neutron
by dual-photon
the cellular can be directly
Bwt,
IV,
com-
to the five-
neutron
neutron
level,
3) On
and
according
I, II, III,
_
L Methodology
tech-
of body
Composition
composition
I
methods,
radioisotopic
be organized
by prompt--)’
be quantified
ume)
and components
on Levels Body
to the five-level in a more sysdirect
of Body
Components
TBK can be directly determined by ( 12): total body sodium. chlorine.
calcium
total
can
catemeth-
are some
biochemical, to estimate
primarily as dilution
According be organized
There
be used
atomic level, #{176}Kcounting
phosphorus,
several
such
Study
as follows:
1) On whole-body
2)
are
groupings
27
MODEL
The
ods and neutron-activation analysis. model, however, the methods can
level
COMPOSITION
to 1flC’t/lOdOl()tl’
gorized
such
BODY
methods
are
not
only
are dependent
on the
and
components
unknown
based
on
steady-state as de-
populations.
and indirect body-composition according to the five-level model
methodology as shown
can be by the ex-
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/56/1/19/4715618 by Denise Hannibal user on 19 May 2018
Heymsfield SB, Waki M, Kehayias J. et al. Chemical and elemental analysis ofhumans in vivo using improved body composition models. Am J Physiol 199l:26l:E190-8. 2. Snyder WS. Cook Mi. Nasset ES, Karhausen LR. Howells OP. Tipton lH. Report of the task group on Reference Man. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1984. I.
28
WANG
3. Cohn
SH, Dombrowski CS. Measurement of total-body calcium. chlorine. nitrogen. and phosphorus in man by in-vivo neutron activation. I NucI Med 197 1:12:499-505. Kehayias Ii. Heymsfield SB. Dilmanian FA. Wang I, Gunther DM, Pierson RN. Measurement ofbody fat by neutron inelastic scattering: comments on installation. operation. and error analysis. In: Yasumura 5, Harrison JE, McNeill KG. Woodhead AD. Dilmanian FA. eds. In vivo body composition studies. New York: Plenum Press, 1990:317-25. Kleiber M. The fire oflife. Huntington. NY: Robert E Kreiger. 1975. Gurr MI. Harwood IL. Lipid biochemistry. 4th ed. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991. Diem K. Constituents of living matter. 6th ed. Ardsley. NY: Geigy Pharmaceuticals, 1962. Knight OS. Beddoe AH. Streat SI. Hill GL. Body composition of two human cadavers by neutron activation and chemical analysis. Am I Physiol 1986:250:El79-85. Behnke AR, Wilmore JH. Evaluation and regulation ofbody build and composition. Englewoocl Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall. 1974. Forbes GB. Human body composition. New York: Springer-Verlag. 1987. Moore FD. Olesen KH. McMurray ID. Parker HV, Ball MR. Boyden CM. The body cell mass and its supporting environment. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1963. Heymsfield SB. Wang J. Aulet M, et al. Dual photon absorptiometry: validation of mineral and fat measurements. In: Yasumura 5, Harrison JE, McNeill KG. Woodhead AD. Dilmanian FA, eds. In vivo body composition studies. New York: Plenum Press, 1990: 327-37. Jacob SW, Francone CA. Lossow WI. Structure and function in man. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1978. Armstrong WD, Singer L. Composition and constitution of the mineral phase ofbone. Clin Orthop 1965:38:179-90. Kvist H. Chowdhury B. Grangard U. Tylen U. Sjostrom L. Total and visceral adipose-tissue volumes derived from measurements with computed tomography in adult men and women: predictive equations. Am I Clin Nutr 1988:48:1351-61. Heymsfield SB. Arteaga C. McManus C. Smith J, Moffitt S. Mea-
ET 17.
sodium,
4.
5. 6. 7.
8.
9. 10. 1 1.
12.
13. 14. 15.
16.
surement
ofmuscle
creatinine
method.
mass
in humans:
Am
J Clin Nutr
validity
ofthe
24-hour
urinary
1983:37:478-94.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/56/1/19/4715618 by Denise Hannibal user on 19 May 2018
AL L. Hill GL.
Burkinshaw International Life
Morgan DB. Assessment body by in-vivo neutron
in the human
ofprotein
Symposium
Sciences.
1978. 18. Lohman
T. Roche
ization
on Nuclear
Vienna:
Activation
International
manual.
Techniques
Atomic
AF. Martorell
reference
Champaign,
ofthe distribution activation analysis. Energy
in the
Association.
R. eds. Anthropometric standardIL: Human Kinetics Books.
1988. I 9.
20.
IS, Webster I. Quetelet’s fatness. Int I Obes 1985:9:147-53. Sin WE. Body composition from
index
Garrow
(W/H2)
as a measure
of
fluid spaces and density: analysis A, eds. Techniques for measuring body composition. Washington: National Academy ofScience. 1969. 2 1 . Ellis KI. Cohn SH. Correlation between skeletal calcium mass and muscle mass in man. I Appl Physiol 1975:38:455-60. 22. DuBois D. DuBois EF. Clinical calorimeter. A formula to estimate the approximate surface if height and weight be known. Arch Int Med 1916:17:863-71. 23. Cohn SH, Vartsky D. Yasumura S. Vaswan AN, Ellis KJ. Indexes ofbody cell mass: nitrogen versus potassium. Am J Physiol 1983:244: of methods.
In: Brozek
I, Henschel
E305-l0.
24.
Pierson
RN Jr. Wang
High
precision
compartmental
Harrison vivo
neutron
analysis
JE. McNeil
body
I. Heymsfield
in-vivo
in
SB, Dilmanian activation
body
composition.
KG, Woodhead
composition
studies.
FA. Weber
analysis:
New
a new In:
AD,
Dilmanian
York:
Plenum
DA.
era
for
Yasumura
S.
FA, eds. In Press, 1990:
3 17-25. 25.
Yasumura by total
5, Cohn SH, Ellis KJ. Measurement ofextracellular space body neutron activation. Am J Physiol 1983:244:36-40.
26.
Seidell
27.
measuring adipose-tissue distribution-a computed tomography and 1.5-T magnetic Nutr 1990:51:953-7. Sin WE. The gross composition ofthe body. and
28.
IC.
medical
Martin estimation
29.
Bakker
physics.
AD. Spenst of muscle
CJG.
van
der
Kooy
K. Imaging
techniques
comparison resonance.
Advances
for
between Am I Clin in biological
1956:49:239-80.
LF. Drinkwater mass
729-33. Novak LP. Aging. total body in males and females between 1972:27:438-43.
in men.
DT. Clarys Med
potassium, the
ages
IP. Anthropometric
Sci Sports
fat-free 1 8 and
Exerc
I 990:22:
mass,
and cell mass
85 years.
J Gerontol