The advantages of absorbeddose calibration factors D. W. O. Rogers Citation: Medical Physics 19, 1227 (1992); doi: 10.1118/1.596921 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.596921 View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapm/journal/medphys/19/5?ver=pdfcov Published by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Articles you may be interested in SUET108: Comparison of AbsorbedDose to Water in HighEnergy Photon Beams Due to Differences in Beam Quality Conversion Factor Med. Phys. 40, 228 (2013); 10.1118/1.4814543 Absorbed dose to water reference dosimetry using solid phantoms in the context of absorbed-dose protocols Med. Phys. 32, 2945 (2005); 10.1118/1.2012807 Comparing calibration methods of electron beams using plane-parallel chambers with absorbed-dose to water based protocols Med. Phys. 29, 284 (2002); 10.1118/1.1449876 Absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams Med. Phys. 27, 2763 (2000); 10.1118/1.1328081 Wallcorrection and absorbeddose conversion factors for Fricke dosimetry: Monte Carlo calculations and measurements Med. Phys. 20, 283 (1993); 10.1118/1.597128