Accepted Manuscript Spatiotemporal Dynamics of BRI1 Receptor and Its Regulation by Membrane Microdomains in Living Arabidopsis Cells Li Wang, Hong Li, Xueqin Lv, Tong Chen, Ruili Li, Yiqun Xue, Jianjun Jiang, Biao Jin, František Baluška, Jozef Šamaj, Xuelu Wang, Jinxing Lin PII:

S1674-2052(15)00202-6

DOI:

10.1016/j.molp.2015.04.005

Reference:

MOLP 123

To appear in:

MOLECULAR PLANT

Received Date: 10 March 2015 Revised Date:

10 April 2015

Accepted Date: 12 April 2015

Please cite this article as:

Wang L., Li H., Lv X., Chen T., Li R., Xue Y., Jiang J., Jin B., Baluška F., Šamaj J., Wang X., and Lin J. (2015). Spatiotemporal Dynamics of BRI1 Receptor and Its Regulation by

Membrane Microdomains in Living Arabidopsis Cells. Mol. Plant. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.04.005.

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Spatiotemporal Dynamics of BRI1 Receptor and Its

2

Regulation by Membrane Microdomains in Living

3

Arabidopsis Cells

4

Li Wang1,2, #, Hong Li1,2, #, Xueqin Lv1,3, Tong Chen1, Ruili Li3, Yiqun Xue1, Jianjun

5

Jiang4, Biao Jin2, František Baluška5, Jozef Šamaj6, Xuelu Wang4,7, Jinxing Lin1,3*

RI PT

1

6 7

1

8

China;

9

2

College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China;

10

3

College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;

11

4

State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Institute of Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences,

12

Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China;

13

5

Institute of Cellular and Molecular Botany, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, D-53115 Bonn, Germany;

14

6

Department of Cell Biology, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc 78371, Czech Republic

15

7

College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

TE D

M AN U

SC

Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093,

16

*

17

#

18

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

19

Running title: Membrane microdomains regulate endocytosis of BRI1

EP

L.W. and H.L. contributed equally to this work.

AC C

20

Correspondence: [email protected]

21

Short Summary: How membrane microdomains are involved in regulating

22

BRI1 endocytosis and BR signaling is still unknown. In this study, using

23

VA-TIRFM in combination with FCS and FCCS, we identified membrane

24

microdomains mediated a novel endocytic pathway involving in BRI1

25

endocytosis. Significant light has been shed on the molecular mechanisms

26

through which BRI1 can be recruited into functional membrane microdomains

27

and internalized in response to BR signal.

28

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 29

ABSTRACT

30 31

The

32

INSENSITIVE1 (BRI1) plays fundamental roles in BR signaling, but the

33

molecular

34

internalization and assembly state remain unclear. Here, we applied

35

variable

36

(VA-TIRFM) and fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy (FCCS) to

37

analyze the dynamics of GFP-tagged BRI1. We found that, in response to

38

BR stimulation, the degree of colocalization of BRI1-GFP with

39

AtFlot1-mcherry increased; in particular, BR stimulated the membrane

40

microdomain-associated pathway of BRI1 internalization. We also verified

41

this in endocytosis-defective chc2-1 mutants and the AtFlot1 amiRNA

42

15-5 lines. Furthermore, examination of the phosphorylation status of

43

bri1-EMS-suppressor 1 (BES1) and measurement of BR-responsive gene

44

expression revealed that membrane microdomains affect BR signaling.

45

These results suggested that BR promotes the partitioning of BRI1 into

46

functional membrane microdomains to activate BR signaling.

mechanisms

total

underlying

internal

receptor

the

reflection

BRASSINOSTEROID

effects

of

BR

on

BRI1

fluorescence

microscopy

TE D

M AN U

SC

angle

(BR)

RI PT

brassinosteroid

EP

47

major

Keywords: BRI1; BR signaling; endocytosis; membrane microdomains;

49

spatiotemporal dynamics

50 51 52 53

AC C

48

54 55 56 57 58 2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT INTRODUCTION

60

Brassinosteroids (BRs) are essential plant steroid hormones that regulate a

61

wide range of developmental and physiological processes, including cell

62

elongation and root growth (Clouse and Sasse, 1998; Wu et al., 2011). The major

63

BR receptor BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1 (BRI1) plays fundamental

64

roles in BR signaling and plant development (Wang et al., 2001; Wang and He,

65

2004). For example, knock-out mutants of BRI1 are extremely dwarfed, and

66

completely BR-insensitive (Clouse et al., 1996; Li and Chory, 1997; Kinoshita et

67

al., 2005). BRI1 belongs to the leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase

68

(LRR-RLK) class and has an extracellular domain containing 24 leucine-rich

69

repeats (LRRs), a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic domain

70

containing a serine/threonine (Ser/Thr) kinase domain (Li and Chory, 1997; Vert

71

et al., 2005). Upon perceiving BRs, plant cells activate BRI1 kinase to trigger

72

the dissociation of the inhibitory BRI1 KINASE INHIBITOR 1 (BKI1), thus

73

enabling sequential transphosphorylation of BRI1 and its co-receptor BRI1

74

associated kinase 1 (BAK1) to form an active receptor complex, thereby

75

initiating BR signaling (Wang and Chory, 2006; Bücherl et al., 2013).

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

59

In animals and yeast, endocytosis regulates protein abundance at the

77

plasma membrane during signaling and acts to retarget or degrade membrane

78

proteins (Royle and Murrell-Lagnado, 2003; Grant and Donaldson, 2009). Plant

79

cells use endocytosis to internalize exogenous material, ligands, and plasma

80

membrane proteins or regulate signaling at the plasma membrane (Murphy et al.,

81

2005; Šamaj et al., 2005). Constitutively internalized and ligand-inducible

82

receptors are subject to endocytosis (Royle and Murrell-Lagnado, 2003;

83

Scarselli and Donaldson, 2009). The constitutive endocytosis of plant

84

transmembrane proteins such as receptors, channels and transporters has

85

been extensively reported; these proteins include PINs, PIP2, and BRI1

86

(Paciorek et al., 2005; Geldner et al., 2007; Li et al., 2011). The constitutive

87

internalization of PIN1, PIN2 and PIP2;1 requires clathrin-dependent

AC C

EP

76

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT endocytosis (Baisa et al., 2013; Dhonukshe et al., 2007; Kitakura et al., 2011).

89

Furthermore, plant structural sterols occur within endocytic networks, and play

90

a role in a constitutive endocytic cycling of some plasma membrane transport

91

proteins (Šamaj et al., 2005). BRI1 mainly localizes to the plasma membrane

92

and early endosomal compartments in Arabidopsis root cells (Russinova et al.,

93

2004; Geldner et al., 2007; Hink et al., 2008). Recent work reported clathrin and

94

ARF GTPase (ARF-GEF) dependent endocytic regulation of BR signaling from

95

the plasma membrane (Irani et al., 2012; Rubbo et al., 2013), and ubiquitination

96

can promote BRI1 internalization (Martins et al., 2015). However, the molecular

97

mechanisms underlying internalization and assembly state changes of BRI1 in

98

response to exogenous BR stimulation remain poorly understood.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

88

BR regulates the activity and dynamic behaviors of BRI1 particles at the

100

plasma membrane. Therefore, monitoring and tracking the behavior of

101

individual BRI1 particles is important for understanding BRI1 function,

102

especially in relation to BR stimuli and regulation of downstream signaling.

103

Single particle analysis (SPT) provides a powerful technique to visualize the

104

dynamic behavior of individual particles inside living cells; these behaviors

105

would otherwise be lost in ensemble averages (Groves et al., 2008; Vale, 2008;

106

Vizcay-Barrena et al., 2011; Gowrishankar et al., 2012). Measurements of

107

fluorophore

108

simultaneous monitoring of heterogeneous molecular populations and their

109

complex kinetics at or near physiological conditions (Bacia et al., 2006; Jaiswal

110

and Simon, 2007; Vale, 2008; Lord et al., 2010). Here, we used a BRI1-GFP

111

fusion construct driven by the native BRI1 promoter to monitor the assembly

112

state and dynamics of the BR receptor. To mark other membrane components,

113

we co-expressed BRI1-GFP with clathrin light chain (CLC)-mCherry or AtFlot1

114

(a membrane microdomain marker)-mCherry in Arabidopsis. We showed the

115

dynamic behavior and partitioning of BRI1-GFP at the plasma membrane, by

116

using single-particle tracking and variable angle total internal reflection

EP

TE D

99

and

temporal

fluorescence

fluctuations

allow

AC C

distributions

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 117

fluorescence microscopy (VA-TIRFM). Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy

118

(FCS) analyses revealed membrane microdomain associated pathways

119

function

120

microdomains in endocytic pathways are critically involved in the activation of

121

BRI1 signaling, an essential step in the response to BR.

122

RESULTS

123

Single-Particle Imaging of BRI1 at the Plasma Membrane

124

We followed the subcellular localization of BRI1 in Arabidopsis seedlings

125

overexpressing a BRI1-GFP fusion protein driven by the native BRI1 promoter,

126

a system suitable for cell biology studies. BRI1-GFP clearly targeted to the

127

plasma membrane and intracellular compartments, particularly in root

128

meristem cells (Figure 1A and B). To visualize the state of single BRI1-GFP

129

particles at the plasma membrane by VA-TIRFM, we used single particle

130

analysis (SPT) method (Jaqaman et al., 2008), which can not only eliminate

131

the fluctuation particles, but also exclude the BRI1-GFP particles from the

132

cytosol. By VA-TIRM, we found that the moving BRI1-GFP particles appeared

133

as well-dispersed diffraction-limited fluorescent spots at the plasma membrane

134

(Figure 1C and D; Supplemental Movie 1). The sequential images showed that

135

individual BRI1-GFP particles appeared at the membrane as isolated

136

fluorescent spots and demonstrated dramatically different dynamics. Generally,

137

some BRI1-GFP particles stayed at certain positions for a few frames and then

138

rapidly disappeared, possibly due to endocytosis or photobleaching. By

139

contrast, some BRI1-GFP particles appeared gradually in the plane of focus or

140

diffused laterally (Supplemental Figure 1). Two representative fluorescence

141

intensity tracks of BRI1-GFP particles are shown in Figure 1E and F.

endocytosis.

We

further

showed

that

membrane

RI PT

BRI1

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

in

142

To examine the diffusion of BRI1-GFP particles at the plasma membrane,

143

we quantified the diffusion modes of individual BRI1-GFP particles by

144

analyzing the mean square displacement curves obtained from single-particle 5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT tracking in consecutive images. BRI1-GFP particles exhibited multiple motion

146

types, which can be classified as: simple Brownian diffusion, restricted diffusion

147

limited by corrals or impaired by obstacles, directed diffusion displaying a high

148

velocity, or mixed diffusion combining Brownian and restricted modes (Figure

149

1G).

150

Motion and Diffusion of BRI1 Particles at the Plasma Membrane

151

We were also curious as to whether BRs affect the dynamic behavior of BRI1

152

proteins at the plasma membrane; therefore we monitored the motion of BRI1

153

particles in plant cells with different BR levels (Figure 2A and B). In Col-0 (wild

154

type, WT) seedlings expressing BRI1-GFP, the motion ranges of BRI1-GFP

155

distributed into two subpopulations, long distance motion (39.4%, 1.05 ± 0.27

156

µm, the position of the peak) and short distance motion (60.6%, 0.55 ± 0.13

157

µm, the position of the peak) (Figure 2C and G). After BRZ (BR biosynthesis

158

inhibitor) treatment, the motion ranges of BRI1-GFP particles were different

159

from those in Col-0 wild type; only 32.78% of the particles showed long distance

160

motion and 67.22% showed short distance motion (Figure 2D and G). We

161

further confirmed in the brassinosteroid-deficient det2 mutants (with low

162

endogenous BR levels) expressing BRI1-GFP, and found that long distance

163

motion and short distance motion were 27.2% and 72.8%, respectively (Figure

164

2E and G). This indicates that the majority of BRI1-GFP particles in the resting

165

state were immobile and their diffusion was restricted within a limited domain at

166

the plasma membrane. When the Col-0/BRI1-GFP seedlings were treated with

167

0.1 µM of the BR analog 24-epibrassinolide (eBL), BRI1-GFP diffusion

168

changed significantly, with 56.8% showing long distance motion and 43.2%

169

showing short distance motion, indicating that activated BRI1 proteins can

170

diffuse from limited zones to relative wide zones (Figure 2F and G).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

145

171

We then determined the dynamic properties of BRI1 proteins in more

172

detail by calculating diffusion coefficients at different BR levels. For this

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT purpose, the distribution of diffusion coefficients was plotted on histograms and

174

fitted using Gaussian functions, in which the Gaussian peaks (noted as Ĝ)

175

were considered as the characteristic diffusion coefficients. We found that Ĝ

176

was 8.8 × 10-3 µm2/s (SE 8.17 to 9.44 × 10-3 µm2/s) in control Col-0/BRI1-GFP

177

seedlings (WT) (Figure 2H and L). In det2/BRI1-GFP seedlings, or after BRZ

178

treatment, Ĝ was 6.11× 10-3 µm2/s (SE 5.51 to 6.77 × 10-3 µm2/s) / 6.58× 10-3

179

µm2/s (SE 6.04 to 7.06 × 10-3 µm2/s), representing a significant decrease in

180

comparison to Col-0/BRI1-GFP seedlings (Figure 2I,J and L). Only slight

181

changes occurred in the mock control treated with 0.85‰ EtOH (Supplemental

182

Figure 2A-C), but, in contrast, eBL treatment caused a significant increase in Ĝ

183

(1.39 × 10-2 µm2/s, SE 1.28 to 1.51 × 10-2 µm2/s) (P

Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the BRI1 Receptor and its Regulation by Membrane Microdomains in Living Arabidopsis Cells.

The major brassinosteroid (BR) receptor of Arabidopsis BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1 (BRI1) plays fundamental roles in BR signaling, but the molecular ...
8MB Sizes 0 Downloads 10 Views