Solute and Ion Transport: Outer Membrane Pores and Receptors.

DOMAIN 3 METABOLISM

Solute and Ion Transport: Outer Membrane Pores and Receptors SATOSHI YAMASHITA AND SUSAN K. BUCHANAN Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892

ABSTRACT Two membranes enclose Gram-negative bacteria—an inner membrane consisting of phospholipid and an outer membrane having an asymmetric structure in which the inner leaflet contains phospholipid and the outer leaflet consists primarily of lipopolysaccharide. The impermeable nature of the outer membrane imposes a need for numerous outer membrane pores and transporters to ferry substances in and out of the cell. These outer membrane proteins have structures distinct from their inner membrane counterparts and most often function without any discernable energy source. In this chapter, we review the structures and functions of four classes of outer membrane protein: general and specific porins, specific transporters, TonB-dependent transporters, and export channels. While not an exhaustive list, these classes exemplify small-molecule transport across the outer membrane and illustrate the diversity of structures and functions found in Gram-negative bacteria. Received: 4 June 2009 Accepted: 10 August 2009 Posted: 31 March 2010 Supercedes previous posting at EcoSal.org. Editor: Valley Stewart, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA Citation: EcoSal Plus 2013; doi:10.1128/ ecosalplus.3.3.1. Correspondence: Susan K. Buchanan: [email protected] Copyright: © 2013 American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved. doi:10.1128/ecosalplus.3.3.1

INTRODUCTION The cell envelopes of gram-negative bacteria consist of two membrane systems: the inner membrane (IM) and outer membrane (OM). The two membranes have chemically different characteristics; while the IM is composed of various phospholipids, the OM has an asymmetric structure with the inner leaflet composed of phospholipids and the outer leaflet composed primarily of lipopolysaccharide molecules. The lipopolysaccharide molecules are linked together through divalent cations such as Mg2+, creating an impermeable barrier that protects the bacterium from toxins and harsh environmental conditions (1). Because of the impermeable nature of the OM, it contains many kinds of transporters for selective transport of various solutes into the periplasm. Structural studies of OM channels indicate that almost all OM channels form transmembrane β-barrels, rather than bundles of αhelices as are found in receptors, channels, and transporters in the IM. This means that the transport mechanisms of OM channels are unique and differ from those found in the IM. In this chapter, we describe four categories of transport systems across the OM: (i) general and specific porins; (ii) specific transporters; (iii) TonB-dependent transporters; and (iv) export channels.

ASMScience.org/EcoSalPlus

1 Downloaded from www.asmscience.org by IP: 128.122.230.132 On: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 07:56:38

Yamashita and Buchanan

Porins are the simplest channels, transporting small solutes down a concentration gradient by passive or facilitated diffusion. Specific transporters facilitate the uptake of targeted solutes by intimately interacting with the substrates. TonB-dependent transporters are involved in high-affinity active transport of iron chelates and vitamin B12 against a concentration gradient. OM export channels serve to defend the cell from environmental stresses such as toxic compounds. In the section on export channels we will discuss type I secretion in terms of toxin export, but the remaining OM secretion systems are discussed in other chapters.

PORINS The outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria contain many diffusion channels called porins (2). Porins are integral membrane proteins that are composed of antiparallel β-strands that fold into a β-barrel, such that the first strand interacts with the last strand. The β-strands are amphipathic; the inside is hydrophilic and the outside is hydrophobic. The pore formed by the barrel is filled with water and allows diffusion of general nutrients such as sugars, ions, and amino acids across the OM by a gradient of solute concentration. Porins allow the passage of solutes with molecular mass up to about 600 Da (3). In Escherichia coli, OmpF, OmpC, and PhoE are known as general porins. Although the three proteins have high sequence similarity (about 60% identical), there is a solute preference based on size or electrostatics for each of the porins. OmpF and OmpC prefer cations, whereas OmpF allows diffusion of somewhat larger molecules. Because of the larger pore size, production of OmpF is more highly regulated than OmpC when the bacteria are stressed through osmotic strength, acidic pH, and/or toxic chemicals (4, 5). PhoE prefers to transport anions and it is expressed only under phosphate starvation (6). The porin channels appear to be open most of the time. It is known that the channels can be closed either at high voltage (~100 mV) or in the presence of membrane-derived oligosaccharides in in vitro experiments (7). However, the physiological significance of these phenomena is not clear. Crystallographic studies have shown that the general porins form 16-stranded β-barrels with eight extracellular loops and they exist as trimers, consisting of three β-barrels with three independent pores (Fig. 1) (8, 9). Extracellular loop 3 is especially long and folds into the barrel to constrict the pore and confer substrate selectivity. The OmpF pore has a diameter of 7 × 11 Å at its most narrow point. Mutagenesis studies have shown that

Figure 1 Crystal structure of OmpC. (a) Monomer structure as viewed from the side. (b) Trimer structure as viewed from extracellular surface. Extracellular loop 3 (red) folds into the barrel to constrict the pore.

mutations in loop 3 critically affect the rate of substrate diffusion (10, 11). In Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium the major porin is called OmpD. However, OmpD functions to export substances rather than to import them: OmpD works with the IM protein pump YddG to export toxic compounds out of the cell (12, 13). LamB and ScrY are specific porins: they use facilitated diffusion to transport a narrow range of desirable substrates. They consist of 18-stranded instead of 16stranded β-barrels, but they form trimers just as general porins do. LamB is thought to primarily import maltose and higher oligosaccharides of the maltose series (14).

2

ASMScience.org/EcoSalPlus Downloaded from www.asmscience.org by IP: 128.122.230.132 On: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 07:56:38

Solute and Ion Transport: Outer Membrane Pores and Receptors

The transported sugars are captured by a periplasmic binding protein (PBP) and imported by an IM ATPbinding cassette (ABC)-type transport complex (15, 16). Because LamB expression levels increase when nutrients are scarce, it is thought that this protein can transport a wide variety of sugars such as glucose, lactose, arabinose, and even glycerol (17). Crystallization studies of E. coli LamB resulted in structures with bound substrates such as maltose, trehalose, melibiose, and sucrose, although the latter is not a preferred substrate for LamB (18, 19). The channel is partially closed (narrowing to about 5 to 6 Å in diameter) by three extracellular loops that fold into the barrel pore similarly to extracellular loop 3 in general porins. The pore is lined with aromatic residues that form a “greasy slide,” contributing to facilitated diffusion of sugars through hydrophobic interactions (18). ScrY is known as a sucrose channel that has approximately 25% sequence identity with LamB. The crystal structure of ScrY from serovar Typhimurium showed that it has a wider pore than LamB, with a diameter of approximately 11 Å (20). Reflecting its larger pore size, functional studies showed that ScrY can transport a wide variety of sugars in addition to sucrose (21). Therefore, substrate recognition for both LamB and ScrY is not very specific. In addition to the porins described above, there are also putative porins that have been identified through sequence similarity or porin-like activities. BglH from E. coli is a 58-kDa protein that forms a trimer (22). This protein is thought to be expressed as a part of the bglGFB operon that is related to the degradation of aryl-βglucosides. RafY is a 50.7-kDa protein that exists in E. coli strains that contain raffinose degradation genes (23). However, the specificity for trisaccharides, including raffinose, is not clear because the channel is not blocked by any potential substrates. OmpG is a monomeric protein that shows no sequence homology to the other porins and exists in both E. coli and Salmonella species. When LamB is disrupted, the uptake of oligosaccharides is facilitated by OmpG (24). The crystal structure of OmpG was recently solved and it was shown that this protein forms a 14-stranded β-barrel (Fig. 2) (25). The open and closed conformations of OmpG and functional studies suggested that this protein regulates solute diffusion in a pH-dependent manner. OmpL from E. coli K-12 has homology to KdgM, which is an oligosaccharide channel of Erwinia. In one study, null mutations in the ompL gene made a dsbA mutant more sensitive to DTT (26), but another study concluded that null mutations in the ompL do not exhibit unusual phenotypes (27).

A typical gram-negative bacterial genome also codes for a number of smaller OM proteins, having only 8 or 10 β-strands. OmpA is classic 8-stranded β-barrel protein with a large globular domain in the periplasm. This protein is expressed at very high levels and has been identified as a major component of the outer membrane of E. coli (28). The primary function of OmpA is to maintain the integrity of the cell envelope by binding peptidoglycan, but other possible functions include adhesion, invasion, and participation in biofilm formation (29, 30). Although in vitro experiments have shown that OmpA forms ion-permeable pores in lipid bilayers, the crystal structure suggests that no pore exists in the barrel interior (31). However, a nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry structure, which reveals both static and dynamic regions of a protein, showed that the β-barrel domain of OmpA has flexibility along the axis of the barrel and could allow the barrel to form a pore for channel function (32). Another small β-barrel proposed to function as a channel is OmpW of E. coli. This protein is also an 8-stranded β-barrel and is suggested to be involved in protecting bacteria from environmental stresses (33). This protein has sequence similarity to proteins that are related to alkane and naphthalene degradation in Pseudomonas species (34, 35). These similarities therefore suggest a role for OmpW in the transport of hydrophobic molecules. Single-channel conductance experiments of OmpW showed that this protein forms channels and that the channels could be blocked by the detergent molecules (36). The crystal structure of OmpW did not have a continuous channel spanning the membrane, but it had a deep hydrophobic binding pocket on the extracellular side that contained a detergent molecule (Fig. 3). The interior of OmpW is unusually hydrophobic and there is a gap in the middle of barrel that is connected to the binding pocket for the detergent molecule. The authors suggested that the gap might allow lateral passage of small hydrophobic molecules through the barrel directly into the lipid bilayer, followed by diffusion into the periplasm, that would possibly be assisted by a PBP. Other small OM proteins of E. coli are OmpX (adhesion, 8-stranded) (37), PagP (acyltransferase, 8-stranded) (38), OmpT (protease, 10-stranded) (39), and OmpLA (phospholipase, 10-stranded obligate dimer) (40).

SPECIFIC TRANSPORTERS The specific transporters are integral membrane proteins that have obvious binding sites for specific substrates. Two protein families in this category have been characterized: Tsx for nucleoside transport and FadL for fatty acid transport. These proteins are smaller than general




Figure 2 Crystal structure of OmpG. (a) Side view of the structure in closed conformation. (b) The structures in closed (left) and open (right) conformations as viewed from the extracellular surface.

porins but are mechanistically similar to porins, since substrate transport does not require an energy source. Tsx is a nucleoside-specific import channel. Tsx from E. coli is approximately 31 kDa and was identified as

a receptor for phage T-six. For subsequent import of the substrates into the cytoplasm, only the IM proteins NupC and NupG are needed (41). Tsx preferentially imports nucleosides and deoxynucleosides, in preference to free nucleobases or monophosphate

4



Figure 3 Crystal structure of OmpW. (a) The structure with a bound lauryldimethylamine-N-oxide (LDAO) molecule (space filling representation) as viewed from the side. The position of gap in the middle of barrel wall is in red. The putative position of the OM is indicated by horizontal lines. (b) Surface representation as viewed from the same direction and in the same colors as (a). The gap is connected to the binding pocket of the bound LDAO molecule and is thought to form a tunnel for passage of the putative substrate.

nucleosides (42). Purified Tsx reconstituted into planar lipid membranes shows very low channel conductance (43). This observation indicates a narrow pore size that was confirmed by the crystal structure (Fig. 4). It was shown that Tsx folds into a 14-stranded β-barrel with seven extracellular loops (44). Tsx has a continuous narrow channel with dimensions of 10 to 12 Å in the long direction and 3 to 5 Å in the short direction. The Tsx pore is lined by a number of aromatic residues that narrow the channel and contribute to nucleoside binding. The structures of Tsx bound with different nucleosides revealed two different binding sites: one is located close to the extracellular side of the channel and the other is in the middle of the channel. Mutagenesis studies showed that both aromatic residues and ionizable residues in the channel contribute to substrate binding. It was suggested that binding and release of nucleosides by the weak binding sites would result in the movement substrates through the channel. Unlike

general porins, no extracellular loops fold inward to constrict the pore. The FadL family of proteins functions to transport hydrophobic compounds. FadL from E. coli was identified as a transporter of long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs), which are important sources of metabolic energy and carbon. The uptake of LCFAs is also needed when bacteria infect a host cell because of the high concentration of LCFAs released from a host cell by the action of bacterial phospholipases. Efficient long-chain fatty acid uptake by FadL is predicted to suppress the local inflammatory host response (45). The affinity of FadL for LCFAs is in the submicromolar range (46). It is not clear whether there is a PBP for this system, but it has been suggested that the periplasmic protein Tsp, which has homology to the retinoid-binding protein, may be involved in fatty acid binding (47). After transiting the periplasm, LCFAs insert into the outer leaflet of the IM. A flip-flop mecha-




high-affinity binding site. A second crystal structure of FadL in a different conformation was also determined. Conformational differences between the two structures were found in the N-terminal region near the hydrophobic pocket and suggested the formation of a channel for passage through the barrel. Based on these observations, substrate movement was proposed as follows: (i) substrate is captured by the hydrophobic groove; (ii) substrate diffuses into the high-affinity binding pocket; and (iii) conformational changes in the hydrophobic pocket create the initial part of the transport pathway. It is not clear how additional conformational changes occur to complete the movement of LCFAs to the periplasm. Other homologs of FadL transport various aromatic compounds (for example, TbuX of Ralstonia picketii is a toluene channel [50] and XylN of Pseudomonas putida is a xylene channel [51]). The mechanistic differences between FadL and these homologs would be of interest.

Figure 4 Crystal structure of Tsx. (a) Side view of the structure bound with two thymidine molecules (space filling representation). (b) Surface representation viewed from the extracellular surface without bound substrates.

nism is thought to reposition LCFAs in the inner leaflet of the IM, where they are activated by the IM-associated fatty acyl-CoA synthetase FadD (48). E. coli FadL has a molecular mass of 46 kDa and exists as a monomer. The crystal structure showed that this protein forms a 14-stranded β-barrel (Fig. 5) (49). There is no continuous channel thorough the barrel. The Nterminal 42 residues of FadL form a small domain with short helices that plugs the barrel. A hydrophobic groove binds detergent molecules in the extracellular region. On the inside, FadL has a hydrophobic pocket containing another detergent molecule that constitutes the putative

Figure 5 Crystal structure of FadL. The bound detergent molecules are indicated in space filling representation. The positions of detergent molecules indicate a putative movement of the substrate from the extracellular side to the middle of barrel. The periplasmic side of the barrel is completely closed by the N-terminal hatch domain (blue). C8E4, tetraethylene glycol monooctyl ether; LDAO, lauryldimethylamine-N-oxide.

6



TonB-DEPENDENT TRANSPORTERS Gram-negative bacteria, like other organisms, require some nutrients that are scarce in the environment (e.g., iron). Because the process of facilitated diffusion cannot meet the cell’s requirements for nutrients like iron, bacteria have evolved active transport systems called TonBdependent transporters to accumulate sufficient Fe3+ and vitamin B12 against a concentration gradient. Energy is required for transport of the substrate into the periplasm, and it is supplied through association with a complex

of three proteins, TonB, ExbB, and ExbD, that form an inner membrane complex (Fig. 6) (52). Because of the low availability and insolubility of Fe3+ at physiological pH in environment, bacteria produce and secrete iron-chelating compounds called siderophores. E. coli produces a single siderophore, enterobactin, that is transported by the ferric enterobactin transporter FepA. FepA imports Fe3+ chelated to enterobactin (a cyclic triester of 2,3-dihydroxybenzoylserine with a molecular mass of 719 Da). There are other transporters of this

Figure 6 Mechanism of TonB-dependent ferric siderophore transport. The transporter (green) is shown to interact with a TonB complex (yellow) at the TonB box motif (red). Transport of a ferric siderophore across the IM requires a PBP and an ABC transporter (blue). Once the ferric siderophore enters the cytoplasm, the ferric ion (Fe3+) is reduced to the ferrous ion (Fe2+). ASMScience.org/EcoSalPlus



family in E. coli: FhuA for ferrichrome, FecA for diferric dicitrate, Cir (colicin I receptor) for Fe3+ catecholates or Fe3+ dihydroxybenzoyl-serine and BtuB for vitamin B12 (cobalamin) (53, 54, 55, 56). Distinct from other categories of OM transport, TonB-dependent transporters bind substrate with very high affinity, with dissociation constants reported in the nanomolar range. This transport system also requires proton motive force that is transduced by the IM-anchored periplasmic protein TonB, which is, in turn, stabilized by the IM proteins ExbB and ExbD. There is a PBP for this transport system (57), and transport across the inner membrane into the cytoplasm proceeds via an ABC-type transport complex (58). In the cytoplasm, Fe3+ is freed by various mechanisms and released (59). Crystal structures of TonBdependent transporters showed that the receptors fold into a 22-stranded β-barrel (60, 61, 62), one of the largest barrels known to date, with a globular N-terminal domain (fimbrial ushers are larger, having 24 β-strands and a plug domain with a more complex fold) (63). The N-terminal domain consists of 150 to 200 amino acids and folds into the barrel from the periplasmic side to plug the pore. The N-terminal domain also has a conserved sequence of five residues called the TonB box that interacts with TonB prior to transport. The structures of several TonB-dependent transporters have been solved in the presence and absence of substrate (61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68). Binding of the correct siderophore or vitamin B12 induces conformational changes in the transporter that may act to initiate binding to the TonB complex. An important conformational change is observed in the TonB box, which becomes more mobile and more exposed to the periplasm upon substrate binding (69). The interaction between TonB and two transporters has been determined through crystal structures of the TonB C-terminal domain in complex with either FhuA or with BtuB (Fig. 7) (70, 71). These structures provide us with a picture of the transporter-TonB complex just before transport, but it still is not clear how the substrate is transported into the periplasm or what happens when energy is applied to the system. In all of the structures determined so far, the plug domain blocks the pore of the β-barrel, leaving no transport channel for the metal chelate. The plug domain must either undergo a conformational rearrangement to allow the passage of the substrate or must be pulled partially out of the barrel, but the mechanism remains unsolved. Recent spectroscopic experiments suggest that the plug undergoes a physical displacement during the transport process (72).

Figure 7 Crystal structure of BtuB-TonB complex. The C-terminal domain of TonB (green) is attached to the N-terminal end of BtuB (red) at the periplasmic side. The BtuB plug domain is in cyan. Bound cobalamine is shown in space filling representation in orange.

In addition to transporting metal chelates, many TonBdependent transporters are misappropriated by toxic proteins called bacteriocins to gain entry into the cell. The bacteriocins are synthesized and secreted by certain bacteria to kill other bacteria in time of stress (73). The crystal structures of colicins bound to BtuB and Cir showed snapshots of large protein molecules bound to these transporters (74, 75, 76) (Fig. 8). While Cir apparently does not use a coreceptor to transport the colicin into the cell, BtuB-specific colicins have been shown to recruit OmpF for colicin transport, assembling a BtuB-OmpF-colicin translocon (77). Details of protein import across the OM are currently under investigation.

EXPORT CHANNELS We have already described how the porins OmpD and OmpW can function as export channels. However, gramnegative bacteria have more efficient efflux systems for unwanted solutes. The TolC proteins are ubiquitous OM channels that form protein secretion complexes with many different IM proteins and periplasmic proteins (78). For example, TolC of E. coli forms a complex with AcrA (periplasmic) (79) and AcrB (inner membrane) (80), which belongs to the resistance-nodulation celldivision superfamily of transporters (Fig. 9). This com-

8



Figure 8 Crystal structures of two colicin receptor binding domains bound to their TonB-dependent transporters. Left, the complex between colicin E2 R-domain and its receptor, BtuB. Right, the complex between colicin Ia R-domain and its receptor, Cir. The receptors are green, and the colicin molecules are purple.

plex exports a variety of compounds such as organic solvents, detergents, and antibiotics out of bacterial cells. The E. coli genome codes for three homologs of TolC and approximately 30 IM translocases belonging to the resistance-nodulation cell-division superfamily, the major facilitator family, and the ABC family (81). Crystal structures have been solved for TolC and AcrB, but the complete complex structure has not been visualized (82, 83). TolC was previously thought to form just an OM spanning structure like the β-barrels of porins. Intriguingly, however, the structure revealed that TolC consists of a 12-stranded β-barrel that is formed from three protomers that extend into a 100-Å-long α-helical barrel domain in the periplasm (Fig. 10). In the crystal structure, the channel is fully open at the extracellular side; it does not have inward-folded loops to constrict the channel. In contrast, the periplasmic end of the α-barrel was closed almost completely. It was proposed that the α-helical barrel could be opened by allosteric changes in the structure when other components of the efflux complex interact with TolC. TolC also works as a component of the type I secretory pathway (84). One example

of a secreted substrate is E. coli toxic protein α-hemolysin (HlyA) (85). For secretion of HlyA, an inner membrane ABC transporter, HlyB, and the inner membraneanchored periplasmic protein, HlyD, form a complex with TolC. The α-hemolysin, a 110-kDa protein, is thought to at least partially unfold to pass through the channel of TolC. The extracellular surface of gram-negative bacteria is covered by capsular polysaccharides or exopolysaccharides. E. coli is known to produce and secrete more than 80 different capsular polysaccharides, called K antigens. The K antigen in E. coli O9a:K30 is assembled and exported by proteins encoded by a 12-gene operon (86), whereby the export process across the OM requires the Wza protein from the outer membrane auxiliary family (87). Wza is a 359-residue lipoprotein that forms a stable octamer. Electron microscopy (EM) studies showed octameric ring-like structures with dimensions 90 × 90 × 100 Å (88). The crystal structure of the 340-kDa Wza octamer was recently solved by the same group to 2.26-Å resolution (89). The structure is composed of a novel




Figure 9 Schematic model of the TolC-AcrAB efflux complex. TolC (red) and AcrB (orange) form a complex to export substrates from the cytoplasm to the extracellular space. AcrA molecules (green) are predicted to bind the side walls of AcrB and TolC in the periplasm, and are thought to behave as molecular clamps. The export of substrate (pink) is driven by a proton/substrate antiport mechanism.

transmembrane α-helical barrel and an extensive periplasmic domain with a large central cavity (Fig. 11). Therefore, Wza represents the first example of a transmembrane α-helical barrel in the outer membrane. The eight helices (one from each protomer) forming the barrel are amphipathic: hydrophilic on the inside and hydrophobic on the outside. Wza is open on the extracellular side and closed on the periplasmic side in the crystal structure. A recent 3D EM structure of a complex between Wza and Wzc (the IM partner of Wza) showed that Wza changes conformation and opens at the periplasmic side of the channel upon binding to Wzc (90).

SUMMARY We have provided an overview of OM transport systems based on recent research on outer membrane pores and receptors. Modes of transport are categorized by specificity, affinity for substrate, energy dependence, and direction of transport. Experiments using X-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry, and EM have allowed the structure determination of most types of OM transporters and have helped to explain some of the mechanistic principles for transport across the OM. Porins are the most abundant OM proteins and their distribution differs according to bacterial strains.

10



Because they form rather nonspecific channels, their expression is tightly controlled through multiple regulatory mechanisms. Further study of porins will show how OM permeability differs by each bacterial species and how it changes dynamically in response to environmental stresses. The existence of specific transporters, including TonB-dependent transporters, suggests the importance of selectively importing substrates into bacteria. Indeed, these transport systems are critically related to survival of the bacteria during infection of host cells. This means that these specific transport systems are potentially good targets for vaccine and drug development. The fatty acid transporter FadL is also attractive as the prototype of a protein family that transports various hydrophobic organic compounds. Further investigation of this family could be useful for studying environmental biodegradation.

Figure 10 Crystal structure of TolC. The β-barrel channel (OM) and the α-helical tunnel (periplasmic) are formed by three protomers that are colored by monomer.

TonB-dependent transport is the most dynamic transport system across the OM. Future elucidation of the transport mechanism, including structural rearrangements in the transporter, will reveal novel aspects of molecular transport. The studies of TonB-dependent transporters also serve as examples for structures of OM

Figure 11 Crystal structure of Wza. (a) The octameric structure of Wza as viewed from the side. Each monomer is a different color. The α-barrel spans the OM, and three large domains extend to the periplasm. (b) View of the continuous pore of Wza octamer from the extracellular surface. ASMScience.org/EcoSalPlus



proteins in complexes with other protein components. Together with OM export channel studies, the accumulation of the knowledge should lead to establishment of general methodologies for visualization of more complicated, larger complex structures in bacterial membranes. Studies of export channels have shown how varied OM transporters can be. TolC is interesting from the point of view of evolution of β-barrel proteins because the β-barrel domain is built from three protomers. Wza is the first example of a transporter using an octameric α-helical barrel to span the OM. The biogenesis of these exporters is interesting because it could be quite different from that of other OM transporters in terms of insertion and folding in the OM. From a mechanistic point of view, each OM export channel seems to have unique gating properties. Since TolC is related to multidrug resistance in bacteria, further elucidation of the export mechanism and the regulation are urgently needed to design new drugs to specifically block this channel. In conclusion, the study of OM transporters and receptors is still one of the frontiers not only for structural and functional studies of transport, but also for understanding biogenesis and pathogenesis of gram-negative bacteria. We hope that significant findings in both microbiology and clinical applications will be achieved by studies of this area over the next decade. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this review were reported.

REFERENCES 1. Schindler M, Osborn MJ. 1979. Interaction of divalent cations and polymyxin B with lipopolysaccharide. Biochemistry 18:4425–4430. 2. Nikaido H. 2003. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:593–656. 3. Schulz GE. 1996. Porins: general to specific, native to engineered passive pores. Curr Opin Struct Biol 6:485–490. 4. Chou JH, Greenberg JT, Demple B. 1993. Posttranscriptional repression of Escherichia coli OmpF protein in response to redox stress: positive control of the micF antisense RNA by the soxRS locus. J Bacteriol 175:1026–1031. 5. Faber F, Egli T, Harder W. 1993. Transient repression of the synthesis of OmpF and aspartate transcarbamoylase in Escherichia coli K12 as a response to pollutant stress. FEMS Microbiol Lett 111:189– 195. 6. Scholten M, Tommassen J. 1994. Effect of mutations in the −10 region of the phoE promoter in Escherichia coli on regulation of gene expression. Mol Gen Genet 245:218–223. 7. Delcour AH, Adler J, Kung C, Martinac B. 1992. Membranederived oligosaccharides (MDO’s) promote closing of an E. coli porin channel. FEBS Lett 304:216–220.

8. Basle A, Rummel G, Storici P, Rosenbusch JP, Schirmer T. 2006. Crystal structure of osmoporin OmpC from E. coli at 2.0 Å. J Mol Biol 362:933–942. 9. Cowan SW, Schirmer T, Rummel G, Steiert M, Ghosh R, Pauptit RA, Jansonius JN, Rosenbusch JP. 1992. Crystal structures explain functional properties of two E. coli porins. Nature 358:727–733. 10. Saint N, Lou KL, Widmer C, Luckey M, Schirmer T, Rosenbusch JP. 1996. Structural and functional characterization of OmpF porin mutants selected for larger pore size. II. Functional characterization. J Biol Chem 271:20676–20680. 11. Van Gelder P, Saint N, van Boxtel R, Rosenbusch JP, Tommassen J. 1997. Pore functioning of outer membrane protein PhoE of Escherichia coli: mutagenesis of the constriction loop L3. Protein Eng 10:699–706. 12. Meyer PN, Wilmes-Riesenberg MR, Stathopoulos C, Curtiss R III. 1998. Virulence of a Salmonella typhimurium OmpD mutant. Infect Immun 66:387–390. 13. Santiviago CA, Fuentes JA, Bueno SM, Trombert AN, Hildago AA, Socias LT, Youderian P, Mora GC. 2002. The Salmonella enterica sv. Typhimurium smvA, yddG and ompD (porin) genes are required for the efficient efflux of methyl viologen. Mol Microbiol 46:687–698. 14. Orlik F, Andersen C, Benz R. 2002. Site-directed mutagenesis of tyrosine 118 within the central constriction site of the LamB (maltoporin) channel of Escherichia coli. II. Effect on maltose and maltooligosaccharide binding kinetics. Biophys J 83:309–321. 15. Ehrmann M, Ehrle R, Hofmann E, Boos W, Schlösser A. 1998. The ABC maltose transporter. Mol Microbiol 29:685–694. 16. Quiocho FA, Ledvina PS. 1996. Atomic structure and specificity of bacterial periplasmic receptors for active transport and chemotaxis: variation of common themes. Mol Microbiol 20:17–25. 17. Death A, Notley L, Ferenci T. 1993. Derepression of LamB protein facilitates outer membrane permeation of carbohydrates into Escherichia coli under conditions of nutrient stress. J Bacteriol 175: 1475–1483. 18. Dutzler R, Wang YF, Rizkallah P, Rosenbusch JP, Schirmer T. 1996. Crystal structures of various maltooligosaccharides bound to maltoporin reveal a specific sugar translocation pathway. Structure 4: 127–134. 19. Wang YF, Dutzler R, Rizkallah PJ, Rosenbusch JP, Schirmer T. 1997. Channel specificity: structural basis for sugar discrimination and differential flux rates in maltoporin. J Mol Biol 272:56–63. 20. Forst D, Welte W, Wacker T, Diederichs K. 1998. Structure of the sucrose-specific porin ScrY from Salmonella typhimurium and its complex with sucrose. Nat Struct Biol 5:37–46. 21. Ulmke C, Kreth J, Lengeler JW, Welte W, Schmid K. 1999. Sitedirected mutagenesis of loop L3 of sucrose porin ScrY leads to changes in substrate selectivity. J Bacteriol 181:1920–1923. 22. Andersen C, Rak B, Benz R. 1999. The gene bglH present in the bgl operon of Escherichia coli, responsible for uptake and fermentation of beta-glucosides encodes for a carbohydrate-specific outer membrane porin. Mol Microbiol 31:499–510. 23. Andersen C, Krones D, Ulmke C, Schmid K, Benz R. 1998. The porin RafY encoded by the raffinose plasmid pRSD2 of Escherichia coli forms a general diffusion pore and not a carbohydrate-specific porin. Eur J Biochem 254:679–684. 24. Misra R, Benson SA. 1989. A novel mutation, cog, which results in production of a new porin protein (OmpG) of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 171:4105–4111. 25. Yildiz O, Vinothkumar KR, Goswami P, Kühlbrandt W. 2006. Structure of the monomeric outer-membrane porin OmpG in the open and closed conformation. EMBO J 25:3702–3713. ASMScience.org/EcoSalPlus



26. Dartigalongue C, Nikaido H, Raina S. 2000. Protein folding in the periplasm in the absence of primary oxidant DsbA: modulation of redox potential in periplasmic space via OmpL porin. EMBO J 19: 5980–5988. 27. Sardesai AA, Genevaux P, Schwager F, Ang D, Georgopoulos C. 2003. The OmpL porin does not modulate redox potential in the periplasmic space of Escherichia coli. EMBO J 22:1461–1466. 28. Chai TJ, Foulds J. 1977. Purification of protein A, an outer membrane component missing in Escherichia coli K-12 ompA mutants. Biochim Biophys Acta 493:210–215. 29. Barrios AF, Zuo R, Ren D, Wood TK. 2006. Hha, YbaJ, and OmpA regulate Escherichia coli K12 biofilm formation and conjugation plasmids abolish motility. Biotechnol Bioeng 93:188–200. 30. Prasadarao NV. 2002. Identification of Escherichia coli outer membrane protein A receptor on human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect Immun 70:4556–4563. 31. Pautsch A, Schulz GE. 2000. High-resolution structure of the OmpA membrane domain. J Mol Biol 298:273–282. 32. Fernandez C, Hilty C, Bonjour S, Adeishvill K, Pervushin K, Wüthrich K. 2001. Solution NMR studies of the integral membrane proteins OmpX and OmpA from Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett 504:173– 178. 33. Nandi B, Nandy RK, Sarkar A, Ghose AC. 2005. Structural features, properties and regulation of the outer-membrane protein W (OmpW) of Vibrio cholerae. Microbiology 151(Pt 9):2975–2986. 34. Eaton RW. 1994. Organization and evolution of naphthalene catabolic pathways: sequence of the DNA encoding 2-hydroxychromene2-carboxylate isomerase and trans-o-hydroxybenzylidenepyruvate hydratase-aldolase from the NAH7 plasmid. J Bacteriol 176:7757– 7762. 35. van Beilen JB, Eggink G, Enequist H, Bos R, Witholt B. 1992. DNA sequence determination and functional characterization of the OCT-plasmid-encoded alkJKL genes of Pseudomonas oleovorans. Mol Microbiol 6:3121–3136. 36. Hong H, Patel DR, Tamm LK, van den Berg B. 2006. The outer membrane protein OmpW forms an eight-stranded beta-barrel with a hydrophobic channel. J Biol Chem 281:7568–7577. 37. Vogt J, Schulz GE. 1999. The structure of the outer membrane protein OmpX from Escherichia coli reveals possible mechanisms of virulence. Structure 7:1301–1309. 38. Ahn VE, Lo EI, Engel CK, Chen L, Hwang PM, Kay LE, Bishop RE, Privé GG. 2004. A hydrocarbon ruler measures palmitate in the enzymatic acylation of endotoxin. EMBO J 23:2931–2941. 39. Vandeputte-Rutten L, Kramer RA, Kroon J, Dekker N, Egmond MR, Gros P. 2001. Crystal structure of the outer membrane protease OmpT from Escherichia coli suggests a novel catalytic site. EMBO J 20: 5033–5039. 40. Snijder HJ, Kingma RL, Kalk KH, Dekker N, Egmond MR, Dijkstra BW. 2001. Structural investigations of calcium binding and its role in activity and activation of outer membrane phospholipase A from Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 309:477–489. 41. Norholm MH, Dandanell G. 2001. Specificity and topology of the Escherichia coli xanthosine permease, a representative of the NHS subfamily of the major facilitator superfamily. J Bacteriol 183:4900– 4904. 42. Benz R, Schmid A, Maier C, Bremer E. 1988. Characterization of the nucleoside-binding site inside the Tsx channel of Escherichia coli outer membrane. sReconstitution experiments with lipid bilayer membranes. Eur J Biochem 176:699–705. 43. Maier C, Bremer E, Schmid A, Benz R. 1988. Pore-forming activity of the Tsx protein from the outer membrane of Escherichia

coli. Demonstration of a nucleoside-specific binding site. J Biol Chem 263:2493–2499. 44. Ye J, van den Berg B. 2004. Crystal structure of the bacterial nucleoside transporter Tsx. EMBO J 23:3187–3195. 45. Black PN, DiRusso CC. 2003. Transmembrane movement of exogenous long-chain fatty acids: proteins, enzymes, and vectorial esterification. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:454–472. 46. Kumar GB, Black PN. 1993. Bacterial long-chain fatty acid transport. Identification of amino acid residues within the outer membrane protein FadL required for activity. J Biol Chem 268:15469– 15476. 47. Azizan A, Black PN. 1994. Use of transposon TnphoA to identify genes for cell envelope proteins of Escherichia coli required for longchain fatty acid transport: the periplasmic protein Tsp potentiates long-chain fatty acid transport. J Bacteriol 176:6653–6662. 48. Klein K, Steinberg R, Fiethen B, Overath P. 1971. Fatty acid degradation in Escherichia coli. An inducible system for the uptake of fatty acids and further characterization of old mutants. Eur J Biochem 19:442–450. 49. van den Berg B, Black PN, Clemons WM Jr, Rapoport TA. 2004. Crystal structure of the long-chain fatty acid transporter FadL. Science 304:1506–1509. 50. Kahng HY, Byrne AM, Olsen RH, Kukor JJ. 2000. Characterization and role of tbuX in utilization of toluene by Ralstonia pickettii PKO1. J Bacteriol 182:1232–1242. 51. Kasai Y, Inoue J, Harayama S. 2001. The TOL plasmid pWW0 xylN gene product from Pseudomonas putida is involved in m-xylene uptake. J Bacteriol 183:6662–6666. 52. Braun V. 1995. Energy-coupled transport and signal transduction through the gram-negative outer membrane via TonB-ExbB-ExbDdependent receptor proteins. FEMS Microbiol Rev 16:295–307. 53. Coulton JW. 1982. The ferrichrome-iron receptor of Escherichia coli K-12. Antigenicity of the fhuA protein. Biochim Biophys Acta 717: 154–162. 54. Hantke K. 1990. Dihydroxybenzoylserine—a siderophore for E. coli FEMS Microbiol Lett 55:5–8. 55. Heller K, Mann BJ, Kadner RJ. 1985. Cloning and expression of the gene for the vitamin B12 receptor protein in the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 161:896–903. 56. Wagegg W, Braun V. 1981. Ferric citrate transport in Escherichia coli requires outer membrane receptor protein FecA. J Bacteriol 145: 156–163. 57. Stephens DL, Choe MD, Earhart CF. 1995. Escherichia coli periplasmic protein FepB binds ferrienterobactin. Microbiology 141 (Pt 7):1647–1654. 58. Chenault SS, Earhart CF. 1991. Organization of genes encoding membrane proteins of the Escherichia coli ferrienterobactin permease. Mol Microbiol 5:1405–1413. 59. Langman L, Young IG, Frost GE, Rosenberg H, Gibson F. 1972. Enterochelin system of iron transport in Escherichia coli: mutations affecting ferric-enterochelin esterase. J Bacteriol 112:1142–1149. 60. Buchanan SK, Smith BS, Venkatramani L, Xia D, Esser L, Palnitkar M, Chakraborty R, van der Helm D, Deisenhofer J. 1999. Crystal structure of the outer membrane active transporter FepA from Escherichia coli. Nat Struct Biol 6:56–63. 61. Ferguson AD, Chakraborty R, Smith BS, Esser L, van der Helm D, Deisenhofer J. 2002. Structural basis of gating by the outer membrane transporter FecA. Science 295:1715–1719. 62. Ferguson AD, Hofmann E, Coulton JW, Diederichs K, Welte W. 1998. Siderophore-mediated iron transport: crystal structure of FhuA with bound lipopolysaccharide. Science 282:2215–2220.



Yamashita and Buchanan 63. Remaut H, Tang C, Henderson NS, Pinkner JS, Wang T, Hultgren SJ, Thanassi DG, Waksman G, Li H. 2008. Fiber formation across the bacterial outer membrane by the chaperone/usher pathway. Cell 133:640–652. 64. Chimento DP, Mohanty AK, Kadner RJ, Wiener MC. 2003. Substrate-induced transmembrane signaling in the cobalamin transporter BtuB. Nat Struct Biol 10:394–401. 65. Cobessi D, Celia H, Folschweiller N, Schalk IJ, Abdallah MA, Pattus F. 2005. The crystal structure of the pyoverdine outer membrane receptor FpvA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 3.6 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 347:121–134. 66. Cobessi D, Celia H, Pattus F. 2005. Crystal structure at high resolution of ferric-pyochelin and its membrane receptor FptA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Mol Biol 352:893–904. 67. Ferguson AD, Ködding J, Walker G, Bös C, Coulton JW, Diederichs K, Braun V, Welte W. 2001. Active transport of an antibiotic rifamycin derivative by the outer-membrane protein FhuA. Structure 9:707–716. 68. Yue WW, Grizot S, Buchanan SK. 2003. Structural evidence for iron-free citrate and ferric citrate binding to the TonB-dependent outer membrane transporter FecA. J Mol Biol 332:353–368. 69. Xu Q, Ellena JF, Kim M, Cafiso DS. 2006. Substrate-dependent unfolding of the energy coupling motif of a membrane transport protein determined by double electron-electron resonance. Biochemistry 45:10847–10854. 70. Pawelek PD, Croteau N, Ng-Thow-Hing C, Khursigara CM, Moiseeva N, Allaire M, Coulton JW. 2006. Structure of TonB in complex with FhuA, E. coli outer membrane receptor. Science 312: 1399–1402. 71. Shultis DD, Purdy MD, Banchs CN, Wiener MC. 2006. Outer membrane active transport: structure of the BtuB:TonB complex. Science 312:1396–1399. 72. Ma L, Kaserer W, Annamalai R, Scott DC, Jin B, Jiang X, Xiao Q, Maymani H, Massis LM, Ferreira LC, Newton SM, Klebba PE. 2007. Evidence of ball-and-chain transport of ferric enterobactin through FepA. J Biol Chem 282:397–406. 73. Nomura M. 1967. Colicins and related bacteriocins. Annu Rev Microbiol 21:257–284. 74. Buchanan SK, Lukacik P, Grizot S, Ghirlando R, Ali MM, Barnard TJ, Jakes KS, Kienker PK, Esser L. 2007. Structure of colicin I receptor bound to the R-domain of colicin Ia: implications for protein import. EMBO J 26:2594–2604. 75. Kurisu G, Zakharov SD, Zhalnina MV, Bano S, Eroukova VY, Rokitskaya TI, Antonenko YN, Wiener MC, Cramer WA. 2003. The structure of BtuB with bound colicin E3 R-domain implies a translocon. Nat Struct Biol 10:948–954. 76. Sharma O, Yamashita E, Zhalnina MV, Zakharov SD, Datsenko KA, Wanner BL, Cramer WA. 2007. Structure of the complex of the colicin E2 R-domain and its BtuB receptor. The outer membrane colicin translocon. J Biol Chem 282:23163–23170.

77. Law CJ, Penfold CN, Walker DC, Moore GR, James R, Kleanthous C. 2003. OmpF enhances the ability of BtuB to protect susceptible Escherichia coli cells from colicin E9 cytotoxicity. FEBS Lett 545:127–132. 78. Nikaido H. 1994. Prevention of drug access to bacterial targets: permeability barriers and active efflux. Science 264:382–388. 79. Zgurskaya HI, Nikaido H. 2000. Cross-linked complex between oligomeric periplasmic lipoprotein AcrA and the inner-membraneassociated multidrug efflux pump AcrB from Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 182:4264–4267. 80. Kobayashi K, Tsukagoshi N, Aono R. 2001. Suppression of hypersensitivity of Escherichia coli acrB mutant to organic solvents by integrational activation of the acrEF operon with the IS1 or IS2 element. J Bacteriol 183:2646–2653. 81. Saier MH Jr, Paulsen IT, Sliwinski MK, Pao SS, Skurray RA, Nikaido H. 1998. Evolutionary origins of multidrug and drug-specific efflux pumps in bacteria. FASEB J 12:265–274. 82. Koronakis V, Sharff A, Koronakis E, Luisi B, Hughes C. 2000. Crystal structure of the bacterial membrane protein TolC central to multidrug efflux and protein export. Nature 405:914–919. 83. Murakami S, Nakashima R, Yamashita E, Yamaguchi A. 2002. Crystal structure of bacterial multidrug efflux transporter AcrB. Nature 419:587–593. 84. Delepelaire P, Wandersman C. 1990. Protein secretion in gramnegative bacteria. The extracellular metalloprotease B from Erwinia chrysanthemi contains a C-terminal secretion signal analogous to that of Escherichia coli alpha-hemolysin. J Biol Chem 265:17118– 17125. 85. Koronakis V, Stanley P, Koronakis E, Hughes C. 1992. The HlyB/HlyD-dependent secretion of toxins by gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Immunol 5:45–53. 86. Drummelsmith J, Whitfield C. 1999. Gene products required for surface expression of the capsular form of the group 1 K antigen in Escherichia coli (O9a:K30). Mol Microbiol 31:1321–1332. 87. Drummelsmith J, Whitfield C. 2000. Translocation of group 1 capsular polysaccharide to the surface of Escherichia coli requires a multimeric complex in the outer membrane. EMBO J 19:57–66. 88. Beis K, Collins RF, Ford RC, Kamis AB, Whitfield C, Naismith JH. 2004. Three-dimensional structure of Wza, the protein required for translocation of group 1 capsular polysaccharide across the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 279:28227–28232. 89. Dong C, Beis K, Nesper J, Brunkan-LaMontagne AL, Clarke BR, Whitfield C, Naismith JH. 2006. Wza the translocon for E. coli capsular polysaccharides defines a new class of membrane protein. Nature 444:226–229. 90. Collins RF, Beis K, Dong C, Botting CH, McDonnell C, Ford RC, Clarke BR, Whitfield C, Naismith JH. 2007. The 3D structure of a periplasm-spanning platform required for assembly of group 1 capsular polysaccharides in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:2390–2395.



Transport of iron across the outer membrane.

Transport parameters in the human red cell membrane: solute-membrane interactions of amides and ureas.

Lipopolysaccharide transport to the cell surface: periplasmic transport and assembly into the outer membrane.

Nuclear transport and nuclear pores in yeast.

Ion channel activities in the Escherichia coli outer membrane.

Functional truncated membrane pores.

OEP40, a Regulated Glucose-permeable β-Barrel Solute Channel in the Chloroplast Outer Envelope Membrane.

General continuum analysis of transport through pores. II. Nonuniform pores.

Solute transport across isolated epithelia.

Transport parameters in the human red cell membrane: solute-membrane interactions of hydrophilic alcohols and their effect on permeation.

Purification of glucose-inducible outer membrane protein OprB of Pseudomonas putida and reconstitution of glucose-specific pores.

Lipopolysaccharide transport and assembly at the outer membrane: the PEZ model.

Regulation of apical membrane ion transport in Necturus gallbladder.

Spectroscopic Determination of Distinct Heme Ligands in Outer-Membrane Receptors PhuR and HasR of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Some aspects of distal tubular solute and water transport.

Renal tubular mechanisms of organic solute transport.

Solute transport in comparable surface area dialyzers.

Deoxyribonucleic acid and outer membrane: binding to outer membrane involves a specific protein.

Incomplete pneumolysin oligomers form membrane pores.

sodium-ion co-transport by brush-border membrane vesicles isolated from rat kidney cortex.

Bacterial outer membrane vesicles and vaccine applications.

CD59 signaling and membrane pores drive Syk-dependent erythrocyte necroptosis.

Outer Membrane Biogenesis.

The leptospiral outer membrane.