Int Urogynecol J DOI 10.1007/s00192-013-2294-5
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Single-incision mesh repair versus traditional native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: results of a cohort study Tsung-Hsien Su & Hui-Hsuan Lau & Wen-Chu Huang & Ching-Hung Hsieh & Rhu-Chu Chang & Chin-Hui Su
Received: 29 August 2013 / Accepted: 29 November 2013 # The International Urogynecological Association 2014
Abstract Introduction and hypothesis To compare the efficacy and safety of the Elevate™ anterior and posterior prolapse repair system and traditional vaginal native tissue repair in the treatment of stage 2 or higher pelvic organ prolapse. Methods A cohort study was conducted between January 2010 and July 2012. Patients who underwent transvaginal pelvic reconstruction surgery for prolapse were recruited. The primary outcome was anatomical success 1 year after
T.-H. Su and H.-H. Lau contributed equally to this study. T.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Single-incision mesh repair versus traditional native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: results of a cohort study Tsung-Hsien Su & Hui-Hsuan Lau & Wen-Chu Huang & Ching-Hung Hsieh & Rhu-Chu Chang & Chin-Hui Su
Received: 29 August 2013 / Accepted: 29 November 2013 # The International Urogynecological Association 2014
Abstract Introduction and hypothesis To compare the efficacy and safety of the Elevate™ anterior and posterior prolapse repair system and traditional vaginal native tissue repair in the treatment of stage 2 or higher pelvic organ prolapse. Methods A cohort study was conducted between January 2010 and July 2012. Patients who underwent transvaginal pelvic reconstruction surgery for prolapse were recruited. The primary outcome was anatomical success 1 year after
T.-H. Su and H.-H. Lau contributed equally to this study. T.
