Downloaded from http://veterinaryrecord.bmj.com/ on February 24, 2016 - Published by group.bmj.com

Letters ANTIMICROBIALS

Routine antibiotic dry cow therapy WE would like to thank Trevor Jones (VR, January 30, 2016, vol 178, p 123) for his corrections regarding the history of the use of infusion of antibiotic preparations into cows at dry-off and the subsequent development of long-acting preparations, following publication of our Editorial ‘Antibiotic dry cow therapy: where next?’ (VR, January 23, 2016, vol 178, pp 93-94). It is important that the details are recorded accurately. We also recognise that the ‘Five Point Plan’ was the original name and that ‘Mastitis Control’ was inadvertently added for clarity. We would like to stress that there are quite a few situations when (environmental) risks increase the likelihood of a new intramammary infection occurring during the dry period. Detailed advice can only be given with an in-depth knowledge of the individual farm situation; discussions in this area were outside the scope of the article but deserve specific consideration. Summer mastitis is a relatively uncommon example of a dry period infection arising from increased environmental risk, and local history/knowledge suggests that, when the risks are high, control of summer mastitis without antibiotic dry cow therapy may be difficult. We agree with Mr Jones, however, that the extent of protection provided by internal sealants alone for summer mastitis is uncertain. Andrew Biggs, The Vale Veterinary Group, Tiverton, Devon EX16 4LF e-mail: [email protected] David Barrett, Kristen Reyher, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU Andrew Bradley, Quality Milk Management Services, Wells, Somerset BA5 1DU and University of Nottingham, Martin Green, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire LE12 5RD Ruth Zadoks, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G611 QH doi: 10.1136/vr.i815

Correction Use of antibiotics in animals and people, David Burch (VR, February 6, 2016, vol 178, p 146). The penultimate sentence of the first paragraph of this letter should have read ‘My only surprise came from the degree of transmission, that is, 2/747 (0.27 per cent), and the majority (99.73 per cent) seem to be human derived’ and not as stated. The error is regretted. doi: 10.1136/vr.i696(corr) 174 | Veterinary Record | February 13, 2016

Downloaded from http://veterinaryrecord.bmj.com/ on February 24, 2016 - Published by group.bmj.com

Routine antibiotic dry cow therapy Andrew Biggs, David Barrett, Kristen Reyher, Andrew Bradley, Martin Green and Ruth Zadoks Veterinary Record 2016 178: 174

doi: 10.1136/vr.i815 Updated information and services can be found at: http://veterinaryrecord.bmj.com/content/178/7/174.3

These include:

Email alerting service

Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in the box at the top right corner of the online article.

Notes

To request permissions go to: http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions To order reprints go to: http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintform To subscribe to BMJ go to: http://group.bmj.com/subscribe/

Routine antibiotic dry cow therapy.

Routine antibiotic dry cow therapy. - PDF Download Free
52KB Sizes 0 Downloads 10 Views