Letter to the Editor Two Cases of Extensive Limb Swelling After Influenza Vaccination To The Editors:

T

wo children were referred to our clinic on separate occasions, both presenting with extensive swelling of the left upper arm in which they had received an influenza vaccination 2 days earlier. We diagnosed both children with extensive limb swelling (ELS) and no management was required. As not many clinicians in our department were familiar with ELS, we found it important to present these cases and to stress the self-limiting character of the condition to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing and treatment. A boy of 5 years complained about his vaccinated arm the day following vaccination (Vaxigrip, intramuscular triceps, Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France). The second day after injection the parents noticed extreme swelling and redness of his vaccinated limb. We saw impressive circumferential swelling of the left arm, extending from just below the shoulder to halfway down the forearm (see Figure, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/ INF/B956). The swelling was erythematous and was warmer than the surrounding skin. Movements of the elbow and shoulder were not compromised. There was no tenderness upon palpation. Blood tests showed a normal blood count and low C-reactive protein. A girl of 4 years developed a localized swelling around the injection site a few hours after vaccination (Vaxigrip, intramuscular deltoid). Over the following days the swelling extended further along the arm and the arm became slightly painful. She did not complain of itch. Because an allergic reaction was suspected, desloratadine was prescribed, which had no effect on the symptoms. Our physical examination showed swelling and erythema of the left upper arm extending from the shoulder to just above the elbow (see Figure, Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/INF/B957). There were some small blisters located centrally around the injection site. Movement of the arm was not restricted. Palpation was

The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose. Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s website (www.pidj.com).

mildly painful. Both children appeared well and did not have a fever. Their medical history showed atopic constitution. We diagnosed both children with ELS. After a few days the condition spontaneously resolved without sequelae. According to The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre, ELS can be described as a swelling occurring in the same limb to which a vaccination has been administered, extending from the joint proximal, to the joint distal of the injection site, or circumferencing entirely around the limb.1 In the majority of patients, symptoms present within 1 day after vaccination— sometimes as early as only hours after the injection—and in all cases swelling becomes apparent within 48 hours.1,2 Swelling is usually accompanied by other signs of inflammation, such as erythema, warmth or pain.1,2 The pain is usually mild and there is no functional impairment. Other symptoms have also been reported, such as blistering, which was also seen with one of our patients.1,2 The children appear well and do not experience a high-grade fever.1,2 The exact incidence of ELS is unclear, which is partly because no uniform definition exists and cases may also be misdiagnosed or underreported. In the literature ELS is mainly known for its occurrence in children after a booster vaccination with diphtheria tetanus acellular pertussis-containing vaccine; however, it can occur with any vaccine and it is not unusual for it to develop after influenza vaccination.2 The pathophysiology of ELS has not been elucidated. Several hypotheses exist, including it being a continuum of a local inflammatory reaction1 and being a contribution of a type III3 or IV hypersensitivity reaction.4 Although the pathophysiology remains unclear and recurrence rates are high (reported up to 20%), it is thought that revaccination is safe as ELS is generally well tolerated and the condition is self-limiting.5 It is important to note that all authors investigated ELS only with regard to diphtheria tetanus acellular pertussis-containing vaccines. Due to its striking appearance, ELS might be mistaken for bacterial cellulitis or a type I allergic reaction. As in our cases, this might lead to unnecessary diagnostic testing and treatment. It is important for the clinician to recognize ELS as a benign and self-limiting condition that does not require intervention.

Emily Cohen, MD Sabrin Tahri, BSc Ingrid Lukkassen, MD

REFERENCES 1. Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre LAREB. Season influenza vaccines and extensive limb swelling (ELS). Lareb Q Rep. 2012;2:28–34. 2. Woo EJ, Burwen DR, Gatumu SN, et al; Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System Working Group. Extensive limb swelling after immunization: reports to the vaccine adverse event reporting system. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:351–358. 3. Liese JG, Stojanov S, Zink TH, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of Biken acellular pertussis vaccine in combination with diphtheria and tetanus toxoid as a fifth dose at four to six years of age. Munich Vaccine Study Group. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20:981–988. 4. Scheifele DW, Halperin SA, Ferguson AC. Assessment of injection site reactions to an acellular pertussis-based combination vaccine, including novel use of skin tests with vaccine antigens. Vaccine. 2001;19:4720–4726. 5. Rennels MB, Black S, Woo EJ, et al. Safety of a fifth dose of diphtheria and tetanus toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine in children experiencing extensive, local reactions to the fourth dose. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27:464–465.

Risk of Rotavirus Vaccination for Children with SCID To the Editors: uinn et al.1 demonstrated reduced morbidity and mortality from acute gastroenteritis by rotavirus vaccination in young children in Australia. We agree with the consensus statement highlighting these benefits in both developed and developing settings, which clearly outweigh the small increased risk of intussusception.2 Nevertheless, we think that the additional risk rotavirus vaccination poses for children with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) needs comment. Recently, we saw a 21-month-old boy from a country in the Middle-East who was in reduced general condition for further diagnosis and management at our center. Although his older brother died at 20 months of age suffering from postvaccinational BCGitis and severe cytomegalovirus infection, our patient had received rotavirus vaccine (Rotarix, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) twice at 3 and 4 months of age. Ever since, he suffered from chronic gastroenteritis, which resulted in severe stunting and wasting. The patient had a x-linked hemizygous mutation

Q

The authors have no conflicts of interest or funding to disclose. Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s website (www.pidj.com).

Copyright © 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins ISSN: 0891-3668/15/3401-0114 DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000475

Department of Pediatrics St. Antonius Hospital Utrecht/Nieuwegein, The Netherlands

114 | www.pidj.com

The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal  •  Volume 34, Number 1, January 2015

Copyright © 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000507

The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal  •  Volume 34, Number 1, January 2015

Letters

Robin Kobbe, MD

TABLE 1.  Comparison of Rotavirus Sequences From Patient Sample and Vaccine Strain

Gene

Vaccine Strain (acc.no.)

Compared Lengths of Coding Sequence (nt.)

Coding Sequence Mismatches (nt.)

Nonsynonymous Mutations (aa.)

NSP2 NSP4 NSP5 VP1 VP2 VP4 VP6 VP7

JX943605 JX943607 JX943608 JX943609 JX943610 JN849113 JX943613 JN849114

606 528 567 558 660 873 597 963

0 2 3 0 3 6–7* 6 4–5*

0 2 0 0 3 6–7† 4 4–5†

Sequence Identity (%nt./%aa.) 100/100 99.6/98.9 99.5/100 100/100 99.5/98.6 99.2–99.3/97.6–97.9 99.0/98.0 99.5–99.6/98.4–98.8

*Nucleotide ambiguity detected in patient sample. †Nucleotide ambiguity coding for different amino acids.acc.no. indicates GenBank accession number; nt., nucleotides; aa., amino acids.

in Exon 2 of the IL2RG gene (c.252C>A, p.Asn84Lys; MIM# 300400) and curative therapy with stem cell transplantation was initiated at our specialized medical center.3 We identified rotavirus vaccine strain in stool samples by sequencing of 8 different gene segments (VP1, VP2, VP4, VP6, VP7, NSP2, NSP4 and NSP5). In all segments vaccine-associated sequences harboring few new mutations were found, leading to the conclusion that the child’s chronic gastroenteritis was caused by persisting infection with the vaccine rotavirus strain (see Table, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/INF/B978). No other pathogen could be identified in multiple stool samples, including uncommon parasites, coccidia and helminths. Notably, all stool, blood and respiratory specimens were also tested by Luminex xTAG respiratory and xTAG gastrointestinal pathogen panel (Abbott Molecular, Wiesbaden, Germany). In samples from the respiratory tract, we detected high copy numbers of human bocavirus (HBoV) and rhinovirus, which most likely subsequently caused respiratory failure in our patient. Despite all intensive supportive care and treatment, the boy’s condition deteriorated and he died on day 1 after stem cell ­transplantation. In addition to the association with intussusception, shedding of rotavirus for a period of time after oral vaccination and vaccineinduced severe gastroenteritis including infection of healthy siblings have been reported.4 The observation of acute and chronic infections by vaccine strain rotavirus in immunocompromised children led to the addition of SCID as contraindication for administration of rotavirus vaccine.5–7 Our SCID patient presented already with advanced disease and severely reduced general condition. We believe that viral shedding of rotavirus for such a prolonged period of time has not been previously reported and might be explained by the lack of timely adequate medical management. We cannot completely exclude that other gastrointestinal infections and other comorbidities © 2014 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Department of Paediatrics University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg, Germany

might have been involved, but we propose that vaccine-acquired rotavirus-infection had probably contributed significantly to the fatal outcome. The clinical manifestation and diagnosis of SCID patients might be delayed well into the life period after the recommended vaccination schedule. Therefore, we emphasize the negative effect that rotavirus vaccination might have in these endangered patients and we strongly support efforts of mandatory newborn screening for SCID.8

Dennis Klinkenberg, MD Martin Blohm, MD

Department of Paediatrics University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg, Germany

REFERENCES 1. Quinn HE, Wood NJ, Cannings KL, et al. Intussusception after monovalent human rotavirus vaccine in Australia: severity and comparison of using healthcare database records versus case-confirmation to assess risk. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014;33:959–965. 2. Buttery JP, Standish J, Bines JE. Intussusception and rotavirus vaccines: consensus on benefits outweighing recognised risk. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014;33:772–773. 3. Noguchi M, Yi H, Rosenblatt HM, et al. Interleukin-2 receptor gamma chain mutation results in X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency in humans. Cell 1993;73:147–157. 4. Payne DC, Edwards KM, Bowen MD, et al. Sibling transmission of vaccine-derived rotavirus (RotaTeq) associated with rotavirus gastroenteritis. Pediatrics. 2010;125:438–441. 5. Patel NC, Hertel PM, Hanson IC, et al. Chronic rotavirus infection in an infant with severe combined immunodeficiency: successful treatment by hematopoietic stem cell ­transplantation. Clin Immunol. 2012;142:399–401. 6. Patel NC, Hertel PM, Estes MK, et al. Vaccineacquired rotavirus in infants with severe combined immunodeficiency. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:314–319. 7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Addition of severe combined immunodeficiency as a contraindication for administration of rotavirus vaccine. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:687–688. 8. Gaspar HB, Hammarström L, Mahlaoui N, Borte M, Borte S. The case for mandatory newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID). J Clin Immunol. 2014;34:393–397.

Marina Hoehne, PhD Andreas Mas Marques, PhD

Robert-Koch-Institute Berlin, Germany

Monika Malecki, PhD

Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH Institut für Hygiene Köln-Merheim, Germany

Verena Schildgen, PhD

Klinken der Stadt Köln gGmbH Institut für Pathologie Furth, Germany

Reinhard Schneppenheim, MD, PhD Ingo Müller, MD, MSc

Department for Paediatric Haematology and Oncology University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit Hamburg, Germany

Oliver Schildgen, PhD

Klinken der Stadt Köln gGmbH Institut für Pathologie Furth, Germany

Rotavirus-specific IgG Antibodies From Mothers’ Serum May Inhibit Infant Immune Responses to the Pentavalent Rotavirus Vaccine To the Editors: otavirus vaccines have lower effectiveness in low and middle income countries. One possible explanation is vaccine

R Dr.

Becker-Dreps was supported by Grant 5K01TW008401-04 from the NIH-Fogarty International Center. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of CDC. Copyright © 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins ISSN: 0891-3668/15/3401-0115 DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000481

www.pidj.com | 115

Risk of Rotavirus Vaccination for Children with SCID.

Risk of Rotavirus Vaccination for Children with SCID. - PDF Download Free
208KB Sizes 1 Downloads 11 Views