Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by NYU Langone Med Ctr-Sch of Med on 06/18/15 from IP address 128.122.253.228. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
1007
Technical
Retrograde Stents Joseph
Replacement
W. Yedlicka,
Jr.,1 Richard
of Internal
Aizpuru,
David
W. Hunter,
The ability of internal double-J ureteral stents to maintain ureteral patency has been well documented [1 -3]. However, these stents often need to be changed or removed. The techniques of retrograde cystoscopic manipulation and percutaneous antegrade placement or removal of these stents have been described [1 -8]. We present a simple technique for retrograde removal or exchange of internal ureteral stents by using
a right-angle
snare/catheter
system,
scopic control, reported.
that to our knowledge
Materials
Methods
and
under
fluoro-
Double-J
Wilfrido
Bloomington,
Ureteral
R. Casta#{241}eda-Z#{252}#{241}iga, and Kurt Amplatz
IN; Medi-tech,
Watertown,
MA;
Fig.
1 E) is advanced
in
a retrograde fashion over the guidewire and positioned so that the proximal pigtail is formed in the renal pelvis. The stent stiffener is removed, leaving the guidewire and pusher in place. The wire is then partially withdrawn so that the floppy end of the wire is across the junction between the pusher and the stent. The pusher is then slowly advanced with a gentle rotating motion; the floppy end of the wire allows the distal pigtail portion of the stent to spontaneously re-form
within the bladder
has not been previously
Note
(Fig. 1 F). The pusher
is removed,
and a Foley
catheter is placed into the urinary bladder for a follow-up cystogram to confirm proper stent positioning and patency. If necessary, the stent position can be adjusted, repeating the steps described here.
Results Through
a Foley
advanced
used
exchanged with
Heights, (Fig.
a MN;
bladder
assembly urethra proximal or in the
an
Under
catheter,
guiding
guiding
stent
catheter
carefully
catheter
(Microvena
multiangled
double-J
on the stent. is then
angled snare
1A).
of the
1 B). The
loop
for
right-angle Fig.
end
snare
angiographic
a guidewire
into the bladder. Female patients are in the dorsal male patients are supine. The Foley or angiographic
position; is then
or standard
is then
With
withdrawn
(6-French)
fluoroscopic
the
in order
firmly
a short
to
be
Vadnais guidance,
with
advanced
the stent
lithotomy catheter
Corporation,
is encircled
is
the
snare
loop
to close
grasped, distance
the
the entire through
the
(Fig. 1 C), and the end of the stent grasped with a clamp. The end of the ureteral stent is still either within the renal pelvis proximal
ureter.
A stiff
guidewire
is then
inserted
into
the
exteriorized end of the stent and advanced until the guidewire is coiled within the renal pelvis. The stent is then completely removed, leaving
standard,
the
guidewire
in place
appropriate-length,
(Fig.
Received November 6, 1990; accepted 1 All authors: Department of Radiology, reprint requests to K. Amplatz. AJR 156:1007-1009,
1 D). Next,
10-French
the
double-J
tapered
end
stent
of a
(Cook,
after revision December 1 1 . 1990. Box 292 UMHC, University of Minnesota
May 1991 0361-803X/91/1565-1007
© American
Roentgen
Ureteral stent removals or exchanges were successfully performed in 21 of 22 female patients and two of two male patients during the past 2 years. The majority of these patients had malignant ureteral obstruction. In the single unsuccessful case, manipulation of the snare within the urinary bladder was limited by massive tumor ingrowth that necessitated cystoscopic removal of the occluded stent. We have had no complications except for minor transient hematuria in five cases. In two patients, the new stent was inadvertently pushed too far up the ureter. Both were quickly and easily repositioned (see Discussion). The procedure was very easy to perform, even for inexperienced operators. The average time for retrieval or exchange of the internal ureteral stents was less than 25 mm per case; fluoroscopic time averaged 2-5 mm.
Hospital
and Clinic,
Ray Society
420 Delaware
St. SE.,
Minneapolis,
MN 55455.
Address
YEDLICKA
1008
ET AL.
AJR:156,
May 1991
Fig. 1.-A 62-year-old woman had a right double-J ureteral stent placed for ureteral obstruction due to metastatic ovarian carcinoma. Three months
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by NYU Langone Med Ctr-Sch of Med on 06/18/15 from IP address 128.122.253.228. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
after stent placement, phrosis
(seen
A, Right-angle
hydrone-
nitinol snares. Snare loops are 5, 10, 15, and 25 mm
(straight arrows). Guiding catheters (arrowheads), “cheater” (curved arrow). B, A right-angle snare (arrow) through a 6-French guiding catheter has been inserted in a retrograde fashion into urinary bladder. Note distal pigtail of occluded internal ureteral stent (arrowheads). C, 6-French guiding catheter advanced to close snare loop (arrow), enabling removal of occluded ureteral stent (arrowheads) through urethra. D, After guidewire (arrows) was coiled in renal pelvis (contrast material is from a previous CT examination), old stent (arrowheads) was removed, leaving wire in place. E, 10-French double-J ureteral stent set (Cook Co.) pusher (straight solid arrow), stiflener (open arrow), and double-J stent (curved arrow). F, After inner stiffener had been removed, pusher (solid arrows) was used to advance distal end of stent (arrowheads) into bladder over floppy end of guidewire (open arrow). Note that guidewire is only slightly beyond stiffener-stent junction.
A
E
F and complications of that procedure. Retrograde cystoscopic removal or exchange is widely used but usually requires general or epidural anesthesia and the use of a surgery or cystoscopy suite [1 -3, 7, 8]. The retrograde approach with a right-angle snare/catheter system is easy to perform (even for inexperienced operators) and can be done risks
Discussion Internal double-J ureteral stents maintain ureteral patency [1-3].
she had right flank pain and right-sided
on a CT examination).
have been widely
used
to
Antegrade approaches for removal and exchange of these stents have been described [4-6]. However, this is technically more difficult, is much more painful and psychologically demanding for the patient, and requires placement of a large catheter through a percutaneous tract with all the attendant
in any
fluoroscopy
(small 20-25
catheters) mm. This
room.
The
patient’s
discomfort
is minimal
and the procedure is usually completed in technique is best suited for retrograde ma-
AJR:156,
nipulation
in females
enlargement
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by NYU Langone Med Ctr-Sch of Med on 06/18/15 from IP address 128.122.253.228. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
RETROGRADE
May 1991
in males
because may
a longer
make
this
REPLACEMENT
urethra
and
procedure
more
prostate difficult
and uncomfortable. At our institution, we perform this procedure on those male patients in whom cystoscopy is difficult or fails and in those male patients at high risk when anesthesia is used. The most difficult part of the procedure is getting the snare loop around the lower end of the stent. Fluoroscopy in two planes is critical, and the new, more maneuverable snare system, although it has not improved our ability to complete the procedure successfully, has markedly reduced the time required. The only other slightly tricky part of the procedure is pushing
the lower
pigtail
out of the urethra
into the bladder.
In two patients, the new stent was inadvertently too far into the ureter. In one patient, a small balloon
was
advanced
over
the
wire
into
the
advanced angioplasty
stent
and
the
stent pulled into the bladder. In the other patient, the lower end of the stent was still in the bladder; it was grasped with the snare and easily repositioned. In conclusion, we believe that the retrograde transurethral approach with a right-angle snare/catheter system under
OF
DOUBLE-J
STENTS
1009
fluoroscopic guidance is the procedure of choice for exchange or removal of internal double-J ureteral stents in female patients and also may be useful in selected male patients.
REFERENCES 1 . Hepperlen stents:
TW, Mardis a new approach.
HK, Kammandel H. Self-retained J Urol 1978;1 19:731
intemal
ureteral
2. VanArsdalen KN, Pollack HM, Wein AJ. Ureteral stenting. Semin Urol 1984:2:180-186 3. Smith AD. Percutaneous ureteral surgery and stenting. Urology 1984;23:37-42 4. LeRoy AJ, Williams HJ, Segura JW, Patterson DE, Benson RR. In-dwelling ureteral stents: percutaneous management of complications. Radiology 1986;1 58:219-222 5. Boren SR, Dotter CT, McKinney M, Rosch J. Percutaneous removal of ureteral stents. Radiology 1984; 152:230-231 6. Mitty HA, Train JS, Dan SJ. Placement of ureteral stents by antegrade and retrograde techniques. Radio! Clin North Am 1986;24:587-600
7. Hezmall HP, Flechner SM, SandIer CM. Controlled of
ectopic
ureteral
catheters
using
fluoroscopic
endoscopic
retrieval
guidance.
Urology
North
1982:9:
1985;25:613-615 8. Smith AD. 109-112
Retrieval
of
ureteral
stents.
Urol
Clin
Am