JCM Accepted Manuscript Posted Online 27 May 2015 J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/JCM.01237-15 Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
1
Rapid Detection of KPC, NDM, and OXA48-like Carbapenemases by Real-time PCR from
2
Rectal Swab Surveillance Samples
3 4
Tracy D. Lee1, Kathleen Adie1, Alan McNabb1, Dale Purych2,3, Kulvinder Mannan3, Robert
5
Azana1, Corrinne Ng1, Patrick Tang1, 2, and Linda Hoang1,2*
6 7 8
1
9
Control, PHSA Laboratories, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Public Health and Reference Microbiology Laboratories, British Columbia Centre for Disease
10
2
11
Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
12
3
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Fraser Health, British Columbia, Canada
13 14 15
*Corresponding author. Mailing address: Public Health and Advanced Bacteriology & Mycology
16
Program, Room 3072A, BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 W 12th Avenue, Vancouver, British
17
Columbia, V5Z 4R4, Canada.
18
1
19
ABSTRACT
20
We describe a multiplex real-time PCR assay for use on the ABI 7500 FAST Taqman platform
21
to detect all currently described Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC), New Delhi
22
metallo-β-lactamases (NDM), and the OXA48-like family of carbapenemases from bacterial
23
culture lysates or sample enrichment broth lysates.
2
24
The prevention of transmission of carbapenemase producing organisms (CPO) within healthcare
25
facilities requires accurate and rapid laboratory detection methods so infection control
26
precautions may be quickly implemented. In the midst of an outbreak, rapid case identification is
27
required and conventional methods can take too long and be very labour intensive, resulting in
28
delays in infection control and significant costs to the healthcare system.
29 30
Molecular methods are fast and generally have higher sensitivity and specificity than phenotypic
31
methods, and in-house developed methods are typically less expensive than commercially
32
available kits. Published methods for the molecular detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae
33
carbapenemases (KPC), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDM), and OXA48 are typically
34
singleplex reactions targeting only one carbapenemase or are intended for cultured isolates rather
35
than surveillance samples (1-14). We identified the need for a highly sensitive and specific
36
molecular assay that can detect these CPO gene targets directly from surveillance sample
37
matrices, such as rectal swabs.
38 39
We developed a FAST multiplex real-time 5’ exonuclease-based real-time PCR to detect the
40
common carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, and OXA48-like) from rectal swabs in enrichment
41
broths. Although there have been several reports of real-time PCR assays in the literature (1-14),
42
to our knowledge, this is the first FAST multiplex real-time 5’ exonuclease-based real-time PCR
43
to detect and differentiate the 3 carbapenemases, KPC, NDM, and OXA48-like from rectal
44
swabs in enrichment broths in a single reaction. A culture enrichment step was incorporated to
45
increase sensitivity (15).
46
3
47
To date, 23 KPC, 16 NDM, and 11 OXA48-like (http://www.lahey.org/studies/other.asp#table1)
48
genotypes have been described. We used the IDT OligoAnalyzer 3.1 to define a set of primers
49
and probes that is predicted, in silico, to detect all described genotypes of blaKPC, blaNDM, and
50
blaOXA48-like genes (Table 1). To validate this, real-time PCR reactions were performed on an
51
ABI 7500 with recommended FAST thermal-cycling conditions in a 20 μL final volume using
52
TaqMan® Fast Advanced Master Mix (Life Technologies), PCR grade water (Life Technologies,
53
Burlington, ON), and each primer and probe at a final concentration of 200nM and 150nM
54
respectively. 2 μL of sample lysate was added to each reaction. Real-time PCR controls, ATCC
55
strains and clinical isolates previously characterized by conventional PCR (17) are listed in Table
56
2. Bacterial culture lysates were prepared using Instagene Matrix (BioRad, Mississauga, ON),
57
according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Broth lysates were prepared by 2 methods: Instagene
58
Matrix and a water boil. For each lysis method, approximately 30 μL of enriched culture broth
59
was added to 1mL of PCR grade water. Instagene lysates were completed according to the
60
manufacture’s protocol. The tube for the boil method was heated to 100⁰C in a dry bath for 8
61
minutes to lyse the bacterial cells. A 500bp oligonucleotide containing 1 copy of the
62
concatenated target sequences of each assay was purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies
63
(IDT, Toronto, ON). Pooled negative Instagene lysates were spiked with serial dilutions of this
64
oligo ranging from 101 to 108 copies/ml. The limit of detection was assessed in both multiplex
65
and simplex format. All 3 targets have a lower detection limit of 5 copies/μL extracted DNA.
66 67
One hundred and fifty-five blind coded Instagene lysates from archived clinical isolates
68
previously tested by conventional PCR were tested by real-time PCR and results of each method
69
were compared to determine the sensitivity and specificity. The multiplex assay correctly
4
70
identified all 45 positive isolates as having at least one of the 3 carbapenemases tested (Table 3).
71
The remaining 110 isolates tested were negative for KPC, NDM, and OXA48 by both
72
conventional PCR and real-time PCR assays. There was no evidence of cross reaction among
73
these three targets. The sensitivity and specificity is 100%.
74 75
Two hundred and sixty-eight surveillance rectal swabs collected by the participating hospital, as
76
part of their infection control surveillance program, were enriched in 5 mL TSB with a 10μg
77
ertapenem disc for 18-24 hours incubation at 37°C, stationary, in an ambient air incubator and
78
then lysed and tested with the multiplex real-time PCR. Results were compared to isolates
79
recovered from the same broth (Table 4) and investigated as follows: isolates recovered from
80
broths were obtained by sub-culturing the broths to 2 MacConkey agar plates (Oxoid) with
81
imipenem and meropenem discs (BioRad, Mississauga, ON). Colonies growing within the zone
82
of inhibition were speciated and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed according to
83
2014 CLSI guidelines. Isolates intermediate or resistant to imipenem or meropenem were
84
submitted to the reference lab for conventional PCR testing. As there is no gold standard for the
85
detection of carbapenemases direct from stool or rectal swab samples (18), we considered our
86
current phenotypic screening followed by conventional PCR method as the reference method for
87
comparison.
88 89
One hundred percent of conventionally identified KPC/NDM/OXA48 positive screen isolates
90
were identified by the real-time PCR assay. None of the screen isolates harbored VIM or IMP
91
genes. Three enrichment broths had discordant results between phenotypic testing and real-time
92
PCR. Enrichment broths 102 and 220 both tested as phenotypically ertapenem and meropenem
5
93
susceptible, but both tested positive for the presence of NDM by real-time PCR. Broth 220 had a
94
second enrichment broth tested which had an NDM-positive K. pneumoniae isolate recovered.
95
Broth 102 had no carbapenem resistant organisms isolated and repeat testing could not be
96
performed. Broth 239 tested as NDM-positive and OXA48-positive by real-time PCR, but only
97
an NDM-positive E. coli was isolated initially. A second screen sample 1 week later from the
98
same patient recovered an OXA48-positive K. pneumoniae.
99 100
This real-time PCR assay is fast, simple to perform and the results are easier to interpret
101
compared to the conventional PCR. Replacing the current method of conventional PCR with the
102
real-time PCR will significantly reduce turn-around times for CPO detection, especially during
103
an outbreak. For clinical laboratories, a real-time PCR application will reduce the turn-around
104
time for implementing infection control measures and reduce the costs associated with CPO
105
detection.
106 107
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
108
We thank Dr. Michael Mulvey and David Boyd form the National Microbiology Laboratory for
109
confirming discrepant results, and Tony Wong from the BC Public Health Microbiology and
110
Reference Laboratory for assisting in conventional PCR isolate testing.
6
111 112
REFERENCES 1. CDC. Multiplex Real-Time PCR Detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase
113
(KPC) and New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM-1).
114
http://www.cdc.gov/HAI/settings/lab/kpc-ndm1-lab-protocol.html
115 116
2. Cunningham, S. A., Noorie, T., Meunier, D., Woodford, N., & Patel, R. (2013). Rapid
117
and simultaneous detection of genes encoding Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase
118
(blaKPC) and New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (blaNDM) in Gram-negative bacilli. J Clin
119
Microbiol, 51(4), 1269-1271. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03062-12
120 121
3. Hindiyeh, M., Smollen, G., Grossman, Z., Ram, D., Davidson, Y., Mileguir, F., . . .
122
Keller, N. (2008). Rapid detection of blaKPC carbapenemase genes by real-time PCR. J
123
Clin Microbiol, 46(9), 2879-2883. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00661-08
124 125
4. Hofko, M., Mischnik, A., Kaase, M., Zimmermann, S., & Dalpke, A. H. (2014).
126
Detection of carbapenemases by real-time PCR and melt curve analysis on the BD Max
127
system. J Clin Microbiol, 52(5), 1701-1704. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00373-14
128 129
5. Mangold, K. A., Santiano, K., Broekman, R., Krafft, C. A., Voss, B., Wang, V., . . .
130
Peterson, L. R. (2011). Real-time detection of blaKPC in clinical samples and
131
surveillance specimens. J Clin Microbiol, 49(9), 3338-3339. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00268-11
132
7
133
6. Monteiro, J., Widen, R. H., Pignatari, A. C., Kubasek, C., & Silbert, S. (2012). Rapid
134
detection of carbapenemase genes by multiplex real-time PCR. J Antimicrob Chemother,
135
67(4), 906-909. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr563
136 137 138 139 140 141
7. Naas, T., Ergani, A., Carrër, A., & Nordmann, P. (2011). Real-time PCR for detection of NDM-1 carbapenemase genes from spiked stool samples. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 55(9), 4038-4043. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01734-10 8. Naas, T., Cotellon, G., Ergani, A., & Nordmann, P. (2013). Real-time PCR for
142
detection of blaOXA-48 genes from stools. J Antimicrob Chemother, 68(1), 101-104. doi:
143
10.1093/jac/dks340
144 145
9. Schechner, V., Straus-Robinson, K., Schwartz, D., Pfeffer, I., Tarabeia, J.,
146
Moskovich, R., . . . Navon-Venezia, S. (2009). Evaluation of PCR-based testing for
147
surveillance of KPC-producing carbapenem-resistant members of the Enterobacteriaceae
148
family. J Clin Microbiol, 47(10), 3261-3265. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02368-08
149 150
10. Singh, K., Mangold, K. A., Wyant, K., Schora, D. M., Voss, B., Kaul, K. L., . . .
151
Peterson, L. R. (2012). Rectal screening for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases:
152
comparison of real-time PCR and culture using two selective screening agar plates. J Clin
153
Microbiol, 50(8), 2596-2600. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00654-12
154 155
11. Swayne, R. L., Ludlam, H. A., Shet, V. G., Woodford, N., & Curran, M. D. (2011).
156
Real-time TaqMan PCR for rapid detection of genes encoding five types of non-metallo-
157
(class A and D) carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 38(1),
158
35-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.03.010
8
159 160
12. van der Zee, A., Roorda, L., Bosman, G., Fluit, A. C., Hermans, M., Smits, P. H., . . .
161
Ossewaarde, J. M. (2014). Multi-centre evaluation of real-time multiplex PCR for
162
detection of carbapenemase genes OXA-48, VIM, IMP, NDM and KPC. BMC Infect Dis,
163
14, 27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-27
164 165
13. Vasoo, S., Cunningham, S. A., Kohner, P. C., Mandrekar, J. N., Lolans, K., Hayden,
166
M. K., & Patel, R. (2013). Rapid and direct real-time detection of blaKPC and blaNDM
167
from surveillance samples. J Clin Microbiol, 51(11), 3609-3615. doi:
168
10.1128/JCM.01731-13
169 170
14. Zheng, F., Sun, J., Cheng, C., & Rui, Y. (2013). The establishment of a duplex real-
171
time PCR assay for rapid and simultaneous detection of blaNDM and blaKPC genes in
172
bacteria. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 12, 30. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-12-30
173 174
15. Hedman, J., Lövenklev, M., Wolffs, P., Löfström, C., Knutsson, R., Rådström, P.
175
(2013). Pre-PCR Processing Strategies, p 5-6. In Weissensteiner, Thomas, Tania Nolan,
176
Stephen A. Bustin, Hugh G. Griffin, and Annette Griffin, eds. PCR technology: current
177
innovations. CRC press, London, UK.
178 179 180
16. Swayne, R. L., Ludlam, H. A., Shet, V. G., Woodford, N., & Curran, M. D. (2011). Real-time TaqMan PCR for rapid detection of genes encoding five types of non-metallo-
9
181
(class A and D) carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 38(1),
182
35-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.03.010
183 184
17. Mataseje LF, Bryce E, Roscoe D, Boyd DA, Embree J, Gravel D, Katz K, Kibsey P,
185
Kuhn M, Mounchili A, Simor A, Taylor G, Thomas E, Turgeon N, Mulvey MR;
186
Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program. 2012.
187
Gram-negative bacilli in Canada 2009-10: results from the Canadian Nosocomial
188
Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP). Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. June;
189
67(6): 1359-67.
Carbapenem-resistant
190 191
18. Public Health England, S. I., Microbiology Services. (2014). Laboratory Detection and
192
Reporting of Bacteria with Carbapenem-Hydrolysing β-lactamases (Carbapenemases)
193
(Vol. P8): UK Protocols. link
194 195 196 197 198
10
199 200
Table 1. Primers and Probes Sequence
Name
Probe Dye
Final Concentration Reference (nM) 13 200
GGCCGCCGTGCAATAC
KPC-F
GCCGCCCAACTCCTTCA
KPC-R
TGATAACGCCGCCGCCAATTTGT
KPC-P
ATTAGCCGCTGCATTGATGC
NDM-F
200
CCGGCATGTCGAGATAGGAA
NDM-R
200
CTG +CCA +GAC +ATT +CGGTGCa
NDM-P
CAATGGYGACTATATTATTCGGGC
OXA48F-F
200
CCACACATTATCATCMAGTTCAACC
OXA48F-R
200
CTAAGATTGGCTGGTGGGT
OXA48F-P
201
a
202
b
203
assays
204 205
c
200 MAX/ZEN
LNA 6FAM
MGB NED
150 19b
150 this studyc
150
LNA base pairs preceded by (+) with modifications to the published primers to improve annealing temperatures in Taqman
based on the sequence described by Swayne et al. (16)
11
206 207
Table 2. Summary of positive controls used in real-time and conventional PCR’s Resistance gene Strain Organism Method Real-time and conventional K. pneumoniae KPC ATCC-1705 NDM Real-time E. coli ATCC 2452 Conventional E. coli NML-1049 OXA-48 Real-time K. pneumoniae NCTC13443 F189043 Conventional E. coli
208
12
209 210
Table 3: Summary of clinical isolate results, real-time PCR, and conventional PCR
KPC
Total # of positives by real time PCR a 9
Total # of positives by conventional PCR a 9
NDM
30
30
ΟXΑ48
8
8
Carbapenemase
Species isolated K. oxytoca (1) K. pneumoniae (7) Raoultella planticola (1) Enterobacter cloacae (6) E. coli (7) K. oxytoca (1) K. pneumoniae (16)
211
E. coli (2) K. pneumoniae (6) a 2 K. pneumoniae isolates tested positive for multiple targets. Isolate 45 tested as KPC+ and
212
NDM+. Isolate 54 tested as NDM+ and OXA48+. All other isolates tested positive for only 1
213
target.
214
13
215 216
Table 4: Summary of surveillance sample results, real-time PCR, and phenotypic screen isolates
217
Phenotypic Screen Isolates Total # of positives Carbapenemase by conventional Species isolated PCR KPC 0 NDM 20 Citrobacter freundii (1) Klebsiella pneumoniae (10) Mixed C. freundii/K. pneumoniae (5) Escherichia coli (4) 0 1b ΟXΑ48 a broth 102 and broth 220 both tested as phenotypically ertapenem and meropenem susceptible
218
however both tested positive for NDM.
219
b
220
broth. A repeat screen sample 1 week later had an OXA48+ K. pneumoniae isolated.
Total # of positives by real time PCR 0 22a
broth 239 tested as NDM+ and OXA48+, but only an NDM+ E. coli was recovered from the
221
14