Annals of Oncology 1: 379-380,1990. © 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.

Short report Randomized, double-blind cross-over study of acute cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting, comparing a new schedule of the combination of metoclopramide and methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide alone E. Diaz-Rubio, J.L. Gonzalez-Larriba, R. Rosell, A. Abad, M. Martin, JJ. Valerdi & JJ. Barriga Hospital Universitario San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Germans Trias y Pujol, Badalona; Hospital General de Navarra, Pamplona; Upjohn Medical Department, Madrid, Spain

Key words: cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting, methylprednisolone, metoclopramide

Introduction

Results

Several trials have indicated that corticosteroids such as dexamethasone or methylprednisolone (MP) are capable of enhancing the anti-emetic effect of metoclopramide (MTC) in Cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting [1-5]. On the basis of these trials we started a randomized trial comparing the combination of MTC plus MP, versus MTC plus placebo, in a regimen which included only two intravenous administrations of each of these agents.

The characteristics of the 78 patients who entered the trial are shown in Table 1. Of these, 71 were evaluable, 6 being excluded because of tumour progression after the first cycle, and one because of refusal of chemotherapy. An additional patient was unable to fill out the questionnaire for assessment of nausea and was therefore assessed for emesis only. Table 1. Patient characteristics.

Materials and methods After having given written consent, 78 patients with various types of cancer who were being treated with cisplatin (CDDP) infused over one hour, alone or in combination, entered a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial comparing MTC+placebo (MTC: 3 mg/kg i.v. in 100 ml 0.9% saline solution in a 15-minute infusion, 30 minutes before the administration of CDDP and 1 1/2 hours afterwards), with MTC (same dose) plus MP (250 mg in 100 ml saline solution by intravenous route in a half-hour infusion after each administration of MTC). None of the patients had had prior chemotherapy, and all were treated in an inpatient setting. Each patient served as his/her own control. The randomization procedure and the coding of preparations were performed at the Upjohn Department, and the code remained unbroken until completion of the study. In the second cycle of chemotherapy the patients received the alternative treatment. The efficacy of the anti-emetic treatment was defined as: complete protection (0 emetic episodes), major protection (1-2 emetic episodes), minor protection (3-5 emetic episodes) and failure (more than 5 emetic episodes). The intensity of nausea was assessed according to the following scale: 0: no nausea, 1: slight nausea, 2: moderate nausea and 3: severe nausea. The chi-square test for paired data was used for statistical analysis.

MTC+MP

MTC+Placebo

Total

Number of patients

40

38

78

Evaluable Emesis Nausea

36

35

35 35

71 70

Age (Sex: MenWomen) 2(M9 50-64 ;>65

13 (9/4) 18(13/5) 9(5/4)

9 (5/4) 20(12/8) 9(6/3)

22(14/8) 38 (25/13) 18(11/7)

Sex Men Women

27 13

23 15

50 28

25 15

21 17

46 32

Type of tumour Head and neck Ovary Lung Bladder Colon Cervix Esophagus Testicle

16 11 7 2 2 1 0 0

12 13 7 1 2 2 1 1

28 24 14 3 4 3 1 1

Dose of cisplatin

Randomized, double-blind cross-over study of acute cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting, comparing a new schedule of the combination of metoclopramide and methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide alone.

Annals of Oncology 1: 379-380,1990. © 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Short report Randomized, double-blind cross-over s...
140KB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views

Recommend Documents