Subscriber access provided by SETON HALL UNIV

Review

Probiotics as potential antioxidants: A Systematic Review Vijendra Mishra, Chandni Shah, Narendra Mokashe, Rupesh Chavan, Hariom Yadav, and Jashbhai Prajapati J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/jf506326t • Publication Date (Web): 26 Mar 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 29, 2015

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Probiotics as potential antioxidants: A Systematic Review

Vijendra Mishra*1, Chandani Shah2, Narendra Mokashe1, Rupesh Chavan1, HariomYadav3, JashbhaiPrajapati2

1

National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management Kundli, Sonipat (India)

2

Dairy Microbiology Department, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat (India) 3

National Agri Biotechnology Institute, Mohali (India)

*Corresponding Author Phone: +91-0130-2281167, Email: [email protected]

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

ABSTRACT

2

Probiotics are known for their health beneficial effects and have established as dietary

3

adjuncts. Probiotics have been known for many beneficial health effects. In this view, there is

4

interest to find the potential probiotic strains that can exhibit antioxidant properties along

5

with health benefits. In vitro and in vivo study provides that probiotics exhibit antioxidant

6

potential. In this view, consumption of probiotics alone or foods supplemented with

7

probiotics may reduce oxidative damage, free radical scavenging rate and modification in

8

activity of crucial antioxidative enzymes in human cells. Incorporation of probiotics in foods

9

can provide a good strategy to supply dietary anti-oxidants, but more studies are needed to

10

standardize methods and evaluate antioxidant properties of probiotics, before they can be

11

recommended for antioxidant potential. In this paper, literature related to known antioxidant

12

potential of probiotics and proposed future perspective to conduct such studies has been

13

reviewed.

14

Keywords: Antioxidants, Oxidative stress, DPPH activity, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacteria,

15

Probiotics

16

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 48

Page 3 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

17

Introduction

18

Oxidative stress is the causeof various chronic human diseases. Oxidative stress is caused by

19

increased activity of reactive oxidative species (ROS) through oxidation process. Oxidation is

20

a chemical reaction that transfers electrons from a substance to an oxidizing agent. Oxidation

21

reactions can produce free radicals having unpaired electron and are capable of carrying out a

22

rapid chain reaction, thus destabilize other molecules and generate further free

23

radicals. Examples of free radicals include the superoxide anion, hydroxyl radical, transition

24

metals such as iron and copper, nitric acid and ozone. Oxygen containing ROS is the most

25

biologically significant free radicals. In oxidative stress conditions, cellular mitochondria

26

produce more ROS

27

peroxide) than enzymatic antioxidants(Table 1) (e.g., superoxide dismutase (SOD),

28

glutathione peroxidase (GPX), peroxidase, Glutathione-S-transferase and catalase) and non-

29

enzymatic antioxidants e.g. ascorbic acid (vitamin C), tocopherol (vitamin E), glutathione,

30

carotenoids and flavonoids present/ supplied to the cells. ROS mediated oxidative stress are

31

known to play vital role in the development of chronic diseases (Fig. 1) such as cancer,

32

diabetes, heart disease, stroke, Alzheimer's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, cataract and aging1-

33

3

34

terminate the chain reaction before damage is done to the vital molecules. All these

35

molecules carry out diverse physiological role in the body by acting as an inhibitor of the

36

process of oxidation. Antioxidants terminate the chain reactions by removing free radical

37

intermediates and inhibit other oxidation reactions by neutralizing free radicals. But in the

38

process, antioxidants are themselves oxidized. Thus there is a constant need to replenish

39

antioxidant resources as one antioxidant molecule can only react with a single free radical4.

40

Consequently, it is essential to search and develop natural nontoxic antioxidants to protect

41

human body from free radicals and slowdown the progress of many chronic diseases. Due to

(e.g., superoxide anion radicals, hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen

. Antioxidants are molecules which interact with free radicals generated in cells and

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

42

changes in consumer perception towards foods as sources of therapeutic value, there is a

43

spurt in the market of food based ingredients and supplements which provide antioxidants.

44

The projected market value of antioxidants to grow to$238.5 million by 2018, at the CAGR

45

of 4.5%5. There is renewed interest in the search of new sources of antioxidants, which can

46

be safely used in food. Out of various sources, probiotics have been considered as an

47

emerging source of effective antioxidants. Due to their long tradition of safe use, along with

48

potential therapeutic benefits, role of probiotics as an antioxidant is being keenly

49

investigated.

50

Mode of action of food derived antioxidants

51

According to the mode of action, two main groups of antioxidants can be distinguished. The

52

first comprises the chemical constituents which interrupt the propagation of the free radical

53

chain by hydrogen donation to radicals or stabilization of relocated radical electrons. Such

54

mode of action is demonstrated by tocopherols, gallusans and hydrochinons6. The second

55

group is characterized by a synergistic mode of action. It includes oxygen scavengers and

56

chelators that bind to ions involved in free radical formation. Their activity consists of

57

hydrogen delivery to phenoxy radicals that leads to the reconstitution of the primary function

58

of antioxidants. This role is played by substances binding to metal ions, e.g. citric acid and by

59

secondary antioxidants, such as amino acids, flavonoids, β-carotene and selenium7. The

60

main source of these substances is plant material like garlic, broccoli, green tea, soybean,

61

tomato, carrot, brussels sprouts, kale, cabbage, onions, cauliflower, red beets, cranberries,

62

cocoa, blackberry, blueberry, red grapes, prunes and citrus fruits. With a huge market for

63

functional foods comprising antioxidative attributes, there is renewed interest in search of

64

new diverse sources of antioxidants that can be safely used. Dairy products have also been

65

reported to possess antioxidant properties (Table 2) and among various dairy supplements,

66

probiotics have been recently known for potential sources of antioxidants

4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 48

Page 5 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

67

Probiotics

68

Probiotics are defined as “live microorganisms which when administered in adequate

69

amounts, confer health benefits to the host”8. Probiotics have established their efficacy as

70

dietary factors which can regulate gastrointestinal functions thereby imparting health benefits

71

to consumers. Alleviation of lactose intolerance, prevention of different forms of diarrhoea

72

and urogenital infections, cholesterol reduction, reduction of atopic diseases and modulation

73

of the immune system are some of the functions attributed to probiotics9-10. Other benefits

74

include prevention of cancer, particularly colon carcinoma and food allergy11-12. The

75

competitive exclusion of pathogens and reduction in number as well as metabolic activities of

76

harmful organisms by probiotics has been demonstrated in vitro13. Lactobacilli are the major

77

source of probiotics and are usually explained as Gram positive bacteria, devoid of

78

cytochromes and preferring anaerobic conditions, but are aero tolerant, fastidious, strictly

79

fermentative and produce lactic acid as main product14. Various species and strains of

80

lactobacilli i.e. L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. rhamnosus and L. helveticus are considered as

81

successful probiotics and different variants have been available in market for human

82

consumption. Bifidobacterium, even though not grouped with lactic acid bacteria, is another

83

genus with probiotic functions. B. lactis (B. animalis ssp. lactis) is a very commonly used

84

probiotic, although it is not a normal inhabitant of the human gastrointestinal tract. B. longum

85

ssp. longum (and ssp. infantis) and B. breve is mainly used in supplements15. Although,

86

various strains of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria have been known for various health

87

beneficial effects, but their role as anti-oxidant have been understudied.

88

Application of probiotics in food

89

During last 20 years, consumer’s perception towards functional foods including probiotics

90

has changed. The presence of probiotics in commercial food products has been very well

91

accepted and has been known for number of health benefits. In this direction, industries

5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

92

worldwide are concentrating on applications of probiotics in food products as well as

93

constructing a new era of “probiotic health” foods. Foods are considered as better delivery

94

vehicles for probiotic organisms than others due to the role played by food matrix in

95

maintaining the viability of organisms during the transition through the gastrointestinal tract.

96

Dairy foods are considered natural carriers for lactobacilli and bifidobacteria due to their

97

ability to utilize lactose and produce lactic acid.

98

Methods for antioxidant activity screening of probiotics

99

Various methodologies have been adopted to determine the antioxidative potential for natural

100

compounds; however, it is important to use consistent and rapid methods. Each antioxidative

101

activity assay has specific target within the well-defined matrix. Each method has its own

102

merits and demerits. In the absence of a universal method which can give unambiguous

103

results, the best way out is to use the different methods instead of one. Some of the

104

procedures involve use of synthetic antioxidants or free radicals, few are specific for lipid

105

peroxidation and require animal and plant cells, some have a broader scope, some require

106

minimum preparation and information, and few methods are speedy to produce results16. The

107

antioxidative activity of food products including probiotic products has been studied by using

108

different in vitro and in vivo methods.

109

In vitro antioxidative methods. The in vitro assays are based on determination of

110

scavenging capacity against ROS such as superoxide anion scavenging assay, hydrogen

111

peroxide scavenging assay and scavenging activity against stable non biological radicals.

112

Several assays have been used to assess the total antioxidant content in foods such as 6-

113

hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox) equivalent antioxidant

114

capacity (TEAC) assay, the ferric-reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP) and the oxygen

115

radical absorbance capacity assay (ORAC) assay. However, it has been found that the most

116

common and reliable methods are the 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picrylhydrazyl(DPPH) and 2,2’-azino-

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 48

Page 7 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

117

bis-3-ethylbezothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid(ABTS) methods; these methods are simple, rapid,

118

sensitive and reproducible and have been modified and improved as per research

119

requirements17. A brief description of some antioxidant potential screening methods used for

120

probiotics is presented here and summarized in Table 3.

121

2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)assay. This widely used discoloration method was

122

first described by Blois (1958)18. This assay is based on the premise that a hydrogen donor is

123

an antioxidant. The antioxidants are able to reduce the free, stable and purple colored DPPH

124

radical to the yellow coloured diphenyl-picrylhydrazine, which is monitored by using

125

colorimeter. DPPH is usually used as a reagent to evaluate free-radical scavenging activity of

126

antioxidants19.

127

2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbezothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS)assay. The ABTS radical

128

scavenging method was developed 20and was then modified by others21. In this assay, ABTS

129

is oxidized by oxidants to its radical cation, ABTS , which is intensely coloured and

130

antioxidant capacity is measured as the ability of test compounds to decolorize the ABTS

131

radical directly. ABTS

132

cation forms the basis of one of the spectrophotometric methods that have been applied for

133

measuring the antioxidant property of pure substances, aqueous mixtures and beverages22.

134

Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity assay. The hydroxyl radical (.OH) is the neutral form

135

of the hydroxide ion (OH ). This radical is known as the most reactive species and is known

136

for lipid peroxidation and DNA damages23. In this assay, the hydroxyl radical is indirectly

137

confirmed by the hydroxylation of p-hydroxybenzoic acid. However, iron plays central role

138

in the hydroxyl radical formation via Fenton reaction.

139

Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay. The FRAP assay is characterized by

140

ability of antioxidant to reduce ferric 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine complex [Fe -(TPTZ)2]

•-

•+

radicals are more reactive than DPPH while generation of its radical

-

3+

7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

3+

to

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

2+

2+

Page 8 of 48

depending on the available reducing species followed by the alteration of

141

[Fe -(TPTZ)2]

142

color from yellow to blue in acidic condition (pH 3.6) and is analyzed through a

143

spectrophotometer24-26.This method was employed to measure reducing power in plasma, but

144

the assay subsequently has also been adapted and used for the assay of antioxidants in

145

different food or beverages27-32, tea and fruits. A drawback of this method is that antioxidant

146

capacity of certain compounds which can react with ferrous ion (Fe ) and SH group-

147

containing antioxidants cannot bemeasured33.

148

Oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay. The ORAC assay uses area-under-

149

curve technique and combines the inhibition time and inhibition degree of free radical action

150

by an antioxidant into a single quantity. On the other hand, similar methods use either

151

inhibition time at a fixed inhibition degree or the inhibition degree at fixed time as basis for

152

quantifying the outputs34-36. ORAC evaluates antioxidant inhibition of peroxy radical-

153

induced oxidations and thus reflects the classical radical chain-breaking antioxidant activity

154

by hydrogen atom transfer (HAT)37. The peroxy radicals are generated through thermal

155

decomposition of “2,2’-azobis(2-amidino-propane) dihydrochloride” (AAPH) in aqueous

156

buffer. The principle of this method is based on decreasing the intensity of fluorescent

157

molecule such as β-phycoerythrin or fluorescein of the target along with time under

158

reproducible and constant flux of peroxy radicals.

159

Antioxidative potential of probiotic microorganisms and foods

160

Each characteristic of probiotic organism is first established using in vitro methods and

161

subsequently in vivo experiments conducted in suitable animal models. On confirmation of

162

suitability of organism, it is incorporated in suitable food product and further studies are

163

conducted using probiotic food to establish its efficacy, survival under storage conditions

164

etc8. In vitro antioxidative studies have been conducted on different probiotic organisms

165

(mainly lactobacilli and bifidobacteria) as well as food products containing probiotic

2+

8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

166

organisms have also studied. Following section reviews these studies and summary is

167

presented in Table 4.

168

Lactobacillus sp.

169

Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Different antioxidative capacities of lactobacilli species to modify

170

the bacterial profile and prevent the oxidative stress in the Fe-overloaded mice colon were

171

studied 38. The generation of hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radical as well as growth of Fe-

172

dependent bacteria is encouraged by Iron (Fe). Findings of this study showed that survival

173

time of L. rhamnosus GG strain was significantly longer in the presence of H2O2 and

174

hydroxyl radical as compared to non-antioxidative strains, L. paracasei Fn032 and L.

175

plantarum Fn001, respectively. In addition, L. paracasei Fn032 and L. plantarum Fn001were

176

specific for free radical scavenging activities of their intracellular free extracts (ICFE).

177

Scavenging activities increased to varying extent when bacterial strains were exposed to

178

gastric and pancreatic juice. However, Achuthan et al., (2012)39 also reported the resistance of

179

a total 39 Lactobacillus cultures to ROS. Most of the isolates showed moderate to strong

180

resistance towards 0.4 mM H2O2. Majority of cultures demonstrated high resistance to

181

hydroxyl radicals and isolate L.plantarum21 (Lp21) was most resistant with log count

182

reduction of 0.20 fold only. Out of 39 isolates, Lactobacillus spp. S3 showed highest total

183

antioxidative activity of 77.85 followed by 56.1 of isolate L.plantarum55(Lp55) in terms of

184

percent inhibition of linolenic acid oxidation. Moreover, isolate L. plantarum 9 (Lp9) up

185

regulated the expression of SOD (superoxide dismutase) gene 2 in HT-29 cell at the

186

concentrations of 0.1mM (1.997 folds) and 1.0 mM H2O2 (2.058 folds). In addition to this,

187

cultures L.plantarum9 (Lp9), L.plantarum91 (Lp91) Lp91 and L.plantarum55 (Lp55) showed

188

significant upregulation in the expression of glutathione peroxidase-I gene to the level of

189

5.451, 8.706, and 10.083 folds respectively when HT-29 cells were challenged with 0.1mM

9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

190

H2O2. On the other hand, catalase gene expression was also significantly regulated by all the

191

isolates used in this study in presence of 0.1 mM H2O2.

192

Grompone et al., (2012)40 developed a new, fast, predictive and convenient in vitro method

193

for screening of antioxidative potential of new probiotic strains using the nematode

194

Caenorhabditis elegans as host (model organism). In this study, total 78 strains of lactic acid

195

bacteria (Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium) were examined. This collection is composed by

196

62 Lactobacillus strains belonging to L. acidophilus, L. bulgaricus, L. casei, L. paracasei, L.

197

plantarum and L. rhamnosus species, 9 Streptococcus thermophilus isolates and 6

198

Bifidobacterium strains belonging to the B. animalis, B. breve and B. longum species. The

199

LAB stains used in this study are fed to C. elegans and survival rate of C. elegans was

200

examined upon exposure to H2O2-induced stress by comparing with the protective effect

201

exerted by E. coli OP50.As a result of this screening, a Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain (Lb.

202

rhamnosus CNCM I- 3690) demonstrated a high antioxidant capacity.

203

Kapila et al., (2006)41examined the antioxidative activity of ICFE of 13 strains of

204

Lactobacillus sp. by using Microsome-Thiobarbituric acid(MS-TBA) and linoleic acid

205

peroxidation method. Maximum antioxidant capacity in terms of percent inhibition of

206

oxidation was expressed in L. casei ssp. casei 19 (76.82%) followed by L. acidophilus 14

207

(62.21%), Lactobacillus sp. L13 (59.25%), L. casei ssp. casei 63 (53.30%), L. helveticus 6

208

(52.70%) and L. delbreuckii ssp. bulgaricus 4 (52.64%) while remaining strains showed less

209

than 50% activity. In addition to this, strain L. casei ssp. casei 19 showed 72.04% linoleic

210

acid peroxidation followed by L. acidophilus 14 (51.74%), Lactobacillus sp. L13 (51.38%)

211

and rest of all strains exhibited < 50% activity.

212

Similarly, otherauthors42reported the antioxidative potential of ICFE of 19 strains of lactic

213

acid bacteria (16 lactobacilli, 2 streptococci, 2 lactococci) out of 570 strains using

214

Microsome-Thiobarbituric acid method (MS-TBA). However, highest inhibitory activity of 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 48

Page 11 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

215

oxidation was observed in Lactobacillus sp. SBT-2028 (91%) followed by L, casei ssp.

216

pseudoplantarum SBT-0624 (77%). The antioxidative potential of ICFE of 19 strains of LAB

217

including L. acidophilus B, E, N1, 4356, LA-1 and Farr;L. bulgaricus12, 278, 448, 449, Lb,

218

1006, and 11 842; Streptococcus thermophilus821, MC,573, 3641, and 19 987; and B.

219

longum B6 and 15 708 was studied by using inhibition of ascorbate auto-oxidation, ferrous

220

and copper ion chelating assay, hydroxyl and hydrogen peroxide radical scavenging activity,

221

reducing power assay, SOD activity and SOD induction assay43. All strains exhibited the

222

inhibition of ascorbate auto-oxidation in the range of 7-12%. The strain L. acidophilus E

223

showed highest (33.1 mM) and S. thermophilus 3641 exhibits the lowest (0.5 mM) hydroxyl

224

radical scavenging capacity that is equivalent to uric acid. Furthermore, the reducing activity

225

of B. longum B6 was found to be higher, equivalent to 225.3 µM of cysteine and 50 fold

226

higher than that of S. thermophilus 19 987, which had the reducing activity equivalent to 4.3

227

µM of cysteine while strains of L. acidophilus B, E, N1 and 4356 also showed lowest

228

reducing activity. Among the 19 strains of lactic acid bacteria tested, L. bulgaricus strains,

229

demonstrated higher metal ion Fe chelating ability (ranging 5.6-52.9 ppm) than L.

230

acidophilus. On the other hand, S. thermophilus strains showed a very wide range of Fe

231

chelating ability ranging 0.5-72.7 ppm. S. thermophilus 821 and 19 987 demonstrated the

232

highest and lowest Fe

233

high chelating activity for Fe

234

Moreover, for copper ion chelation, L. acidophilus and S. thermophilus strains showed a wide

235

range of chelation ability ranging from 0 to 34.8 ppm and from 2.4 to 51.0 ppm, respectively.

236

Six L. bulgaricus strains tested had high Cu chelating ability ranging from 13.2 to 48.3

237

ppm. Both B. longum B6 and 15 708 had not only high Fe chelating ability but also high

2+

2+

2+

chelating ability, respectively while, B. longum B6 and 15708 had 2+

at 40.7 and 26.6 ppm, respectively.

2+

2+

11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

2+

238

Cu chelating ability (18.5 and 63 ppm, respectively). All the strains were unable to inhibit

239

the SOD activity while SOD activity also not induced when growth medium was

240

supplemented with metal ions Mn , Fe

241

Saide and Gilliland (2005)44, demonstrated the antioxidative activity by evaluating the

242

oxygen radical absorbance capacity of whole cells and ICFE of selected strains of lactobacilli

243

species which was expressed as trolox equivalents per 10 cells. Cell free extract of L.

244

delbrueckii ssp. lactis RM5-4, L. acidophilus NCFM, L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus 18,10442

245

and Y-23 and L. casei 9018 exhibited higher oxygen radical absorbance capacity (total

246

antioxidative capacity) than that of the intact cells.

247

Ou et al. (2009)45reported the comparative antioxidative potential of intact cells and ICFE of

248

B. longum and L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus. In this direction, intact cells of both strains

249

showed 71.3% and 70.4% and ICFE of both strains 72.6% and 75.1%, respectively DPPH

250

radical scavenging activity inhibited the liposome peroxidation by 25-31%. However, there

251

was no significant difference between the antioxidative potential of intact cells and the

252

intracellular extracts; and also significantly decreased the malondialdehyde production in

253

intestine 407 cells.

254

L. fermentum ME-3. L. fermentum ME-3 strain has been comprehensively studied at

255

University of Turku, Finland. Itis a unique strain of Lactobacillus species, having at the same

256

time the antimicrobial and physiologically effective antioxidative properties and expressing

257

health-promoting characteristics45. Research on L. fermentum ME-3 has established that the

258

particular strain has double functional properties: antimicrobial activity against intestinal

259

pathogens, high total antioxidative activity (TAA) and total antioxidative status (TAS) of

260

intact cells and lysates. L. fermentum ME-3 is characterized by a complete glutathione

261

system: synthesis, uptake and redox turnover. The functional efficacy of the antimicrobial

2+

2+

2+

2+

or Cu andZn .

9

12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 48

Page 13 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

262

and antioxidative property has been proved by the eradication of Salmonella and the

263

reduction of liver and spleen granulomas in S. typhimurium-infected mice treated with the

264

combination of ofloxacin and L. fermentumME-346-47. It also revealed the antioxidative

265

potential of probiotic, L. fermentum ME-3 in soft cheese spreads containing different fatty

266

acids. Moreover, L. fermentumE-3 and E-18 contained a remarkable level of glutathione and

267

expressed Mn-SOD, which is of vital importance for prevention of the lipid peroxidation and

268

secrete hydrogen peroxide48. Few researchers49worked on L. fermentumFTL2311 and L.

269

fermentum FTL10BR strains isolated from miang, traditional fermented tea leaves, which

270

liberate certain substances that possess antioxidative activity expressed in terms of as the

271

trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity(TEAC) and equivalent concentration (EC) values for

272

free radical scavenging and reducing mechanisms, respectively. The culture supernatant of L.

273

fermentum FTL2311revealed TEAC and EC values of 22.54±0.12 and 20.63±0.17 µM/mg

274

respectively, whereas that of L. fermentum FTL10BR yielded TEAC and EC values of

275

24.09±0.12 and21.26±0.17µM/mg respectively. These two strains isolated from miang

276

present high potential as promising health-promoting probiotics50.On the other hand, L.

277

fermentum demonstrated higher free radical scavenging activities of against hydroxyl,

278

superoxide and DPPH radicals. Scavenging activity at a population of 10 and 10 CFU/mL

279

for hydroxyl radical, superoxide radical and DPPH was 7.35%, 12.86%, 64.26% and 91.84%,

280

80.56%, 87.89% respectively51.

281

Lactobacillus acidophilus. Antioxidative potential of intestinal lactic acid bacteria L.

282

acidophilus ATCC 4356 was reported52. In this study, both intact cells and ICFE showed

283

28.1% and 45.3% inhibition of linoleic acid peroxidation while 43.2% and 20.8% DPPH

284

radical scavenging activity respectively. Cytotoxicity of 4-nitroquinoline-N- oxide (4NQO) to

285

intestine 407 cells was reduced by intact cells up to 49% while no inhibition was observed for

286

ICFE. Findings of this study suggest that ICFE showed better antioxidative activity than

6

13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

9

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 14 of 48

287

intact cells.

288

Lactobacillus plantarum. Studies by others53, exhibited the antioxidative attributes of the

289

intact cells of L.plantarumAS1 isolated from South Indian fermented food Kallappam. The

290

strain AS1showed 50.96% inhibition of linoleic acid peroxidation while DPPH radical

291

scavenging activity was found to be 29.15%. This study concluded that significant

292

antioxidant effect might be a reason for the reduction of cancerous tumors and related

293

symptoms in rats (also discussed in vivo studies).

294

Antioxidative property of L. rhamnosus in combination with B. longum containing fruit juice

295

permeates such as lemon juice, mango and guava pulps was studied54. The superoxide anion

296

radical scavenging capacity of L. rhamnosus GG was higher than several other bacteria like

297

L. rhamnosus Lc 705, L. acidophilus LA, L. paracasei YEC, BifidobacteriumBB12 and

298

Escherichia coli55.

299

Lactobacillus casei. Both intact cells and ICFE of L. casei KCTC 3260 demonstrated high

300

antioxidative activity and inhibited lipid peroxidation by 46.2% and 72.9%, respectively. The

301

culture had higher level of chelating activity for both Fe

302

21.8 ppm, respectively, which suggested that the antioxidative capacity of L. casei KCTC

303

3260 may be caused by chelating metal ions instead of SOD activation56. Moreover, Yoon

304

and Byun (2004)57 accounted that L. casei HY 2782 contained the highest level of

305

(glutathione sulfhydryl (GSH) among different probiotic strains tested. GSH levels in L. casei

306

HY 2782 reached maximum values after 24 h of cultivation while decreased for 72 h. Effect

307

of culture media on GSH activity was also studied and it was found that GSH levels were

308

significantly higher during cultivation in de Man Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) broth than in

309

tryptone phytone yeast extract broth or bromcresol purple dextrose broth. Significant positive

310

correlation between antioxidative activity and cellular GSH contents was observed.

311

Lactobacillus gasseri. Kim et al., (2006)58investigated the protective effect of the selected L.

+2

and Cu

14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

+2

ions at 10.6 ppm and

Page 15 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

312

gasseri NLRI 312 against oxidative damage to cellular membrane lipid and DNA in Jurkat

313

cell line. L. gasseri NLRI-312 had protective effect on the Jurkat cell lines in terms of

314

oxidative damage though supplementation had no effect on malondialdehyde (MDA)

315

production. There was 50% reduction in DNA damage after probiotic treatment of cell lines.

316

Many peptides are identified in fermented milk that contributes to antioxidant potential of

317

products. A κ-casein derived peptide with DPPH radical scavenging activity has been found

318

in milk fermented with L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus59.

319

Lactobacillus helveticus. L. helveticus CD6 producing a folic acid derivative 5-methyl

320

tetrahydrofolate (5-MeTHF) was studied for antioxidative activity. The ICFE of L.

321

helveticusCD6 demonstrated antioxidative activity with the inhibition rate of ascorbate auto-

322

oxidation in the array of 27.5% which showed highest metal ion chelation ability for Fe

323

(0.26±0.06 ppm) as compared to Cu . The DPPH and hydroxyl radical scavenging activity

324

of intact cells found to be 24.7% and 20.8% proved its antioxidative potential. Moreover, it

325

demonstrated 14.89% inhibition of epinephrine autoxidation, 20.9±1.8 µg Cysteine

326

equivalent reducing activity and 20.8% hydroxyl radical scavenging effect. This study also

327

reported the detection of Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) by using 10% non-denaturing

328

polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. It was observed that SOD activity was absent in the ICFE

329

of L. helveticus CD660.

330

Two strains each of lactobacilli (L. rhamnosus GD 11 and L. plantarum LA3) and

331

bifidobacteria (B. breve A28 and B. breveA10) were studied for exopolysachharide (EPS)

332

production, antioxidative characteristics and their role in gingival fibroblast. Among four

333

cultures, B. breve A28 showed high EPS production at 122 mg/L. It also showed 72% DPPH

334

free radical scavenging activity 88% iron ion chelation activity. The strain also showed 71%

335

inhibition of lipid peroxidation61.

336

Bifidobacterium sp. Several studies have been conducted on antioxidative activity of

+2

+2

15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 16 of 48

337

Bifidobacerium sp. Lin and Chang (2000)52 investigated the antioxidative potential of the

338

intestinal lactic acid bacteria B. longum ATCC 15708. Both intact cells and ICFE,

339

respectively showed 32 and 48% inhibition of linoleic acid peroxidation and 52 and 42%

340

DPPH radical scavenging activity. The cytotoxicity of 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide (4NQO) to

341

intestine 407 cells was reduced by intact cells up to 89% while no inhibition was observed for

342

intracellular extract. Furthermore, intact cells and ICFE showed 16.2% and 34.3% inhibition

343

rates of plasma lipid peroxidation for 10 cells of B. longum ATCC 15708. Another

344

study62reported that Bifidobacterium involved in the transformation of lignans glucosides. In

345

this

346

(Secoisolariciresinoldiglucoside),

347

monoglucoside with yields < 25% out of twenty eight strains. B. pseudocatenulatum WC 01

348

gave highest SDG conversion to SECO, which exhibited 75% yield in cellobiose based

349

medium after 48h. Antioxidative activity of B. animalis 01 culture supernatant, intact cells

350

and intracellular cell- free extracts exhibited inhibitory effect on linoleic acid peroxidation.

351

The inhibitory effect was 30.48%, 41.12% and 71.02% for culture supernatant, intact cells,

352

and ICFE, respectively. Culture supernatant of B. animalis 01 demonstrated highest DPPH

353

scavenging effect (73.11%),which was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than MRS broth while

354

relatively lowest DPPH free radicals scavenging effect was found in intact cells among the

355

tested groups. In addition, culture supernatant showed 78.32% hydroxyl radical and 86.39%

356

superoxide anion radical scavenging activity which was also significantly higher than that of

357

MRS broth whereas intact cell exhibit weak scavenging effect63. Work by others64, reported

358

the in vitro antioxidative properties of thirty four strains of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus

359

and Lactococcus against ascorbic and linolenic acid oxidation (TAAAA and TAALA), trolox-

360

equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC),intracellular glutathione (TGSH), and superoxide

361

dismutase (SOD). Out of these cultures B. animalis subsp.lactisDSMZ 23032, L. acidophilus

9

view,

only

ten

Bifidobacterium giving

both

cultures

partially

Secoisolariciresinol

16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

hydrolyzed (SECO)

and

SDG the

Page 17 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

362

DSMZ 23033, and L. brevisDSMZ23034 exhibited among the highest TAAAA, TAALA,

363

TEAC, and TGSH values.

364

Probiotic products with antioxidant activity. Fermented milk was prepared from cow, goat

365

and camel milk supplemented with probiotic bacteria Pediococcus pentosus and studied for

366

antioxidative property and fatty acidprofile65. The finding showed that probiotic fermented

367

milk obtained from goat milk has highest DPPH radical scavenging activity (98%) followed

368

by product from camel milk (86%) and cow milk (79%). Moreover, it has also been reported

369

that different protein peptides present in fermented milk are responsible for increased radical

370

scavenging activity66.

371

Recently the antioxidative potential of two synbiotic dairy products viz. symbiotic lassi with

372

honey and whey based synbiotic drink with inulin and orange juice containing L. helveticus

373

MTCC 5463 as probiotic strain was evaluated67. Both products showed antioxidative activity

374

in terms of hydroxyl radical scavenging activity, radical scavenging activity and anti- radical

375

scavenging activity. The storage of products at 4±1°C had adverse effect on these activities as

376

for whey based drink, the activity reduced for all parameters. The synbiotic yogurt samples

377

containing L. plantarum and L. fermentum, expressed the radical scavenging in the form of

378

the DPPH radical inhibition to be 85% and 82%, respectively, at day 1 and the values

379

increased as the storage time increased68. In this study, fructooligosaccharide was used as

380

prebiotic for preparation of synbiotic yogurt. To measure the antioxidant activity of probiotic

381

strain L. plantarum NBIMCC 2415, which was used as starter culture for production of dried

382

fermented products69four methods for cell disintegration of strain L. plantarum NBIMCC

383

2415 were investigated such as temperature, alkaline, enzymatic and ultrasound. Alkaline cell

384

lysis method was found to be appropriate and with this method L. plantarum NBIMCC 2415

385

showed high antioxidant activity (5.57 µmol TE/logN). The study concluded that meat starter

386

culture, L. plantarum NBIMCC 2415 not only involved in fermentation process, but also 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

387

preserved the colour, formed the flavor and increased the meat products’ shelf-life as well.

388

Antioxidative activity in soymilk fermented with LAB and bifidobacteria simultaneously was

389

reported to be significantly higher than the fermented with either of the cultures individually.

390

Unfermented soymilk showed hydrogen peroxide-scavenging effect. Freeze-dried product

391

had significantly lesser reduction in the antioxidative activity of soymilk than spray-dried.

392

The antioxidative activity of fermented soymilk reduced after drying70.

393

Some researchers worked on the effect of prebiotics (inulin, lactulose and raffinose) on

394

multiplication of some probiotic strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, used in a

395

pollen and honey medium for obtaining a bee bread-like product. The prebiotics were tested

396

and compared to pollen and honey medium for the viability and total antioxidative activity. In

397

this view, medium B2 supplemented with ground pollen and honey (inoculated with studied

398

probiotic strain) showed ~45% DPPH radical scavenging activity after 7 days of incubation71.

399

In vivo studies in animal model

400

Effect of oral administration of live B. breve strain Yakult (BBY) on skin barrier perturbation

401

caused by UV and reactive oxygen species was studied in hairless mice72. The strain BBY

402

prevented the UV induced increase in transepidermal waterloss (TEWL). It also significantly

403

suppressed the hydrogen peroxide level, oxidation of proteins and lipids and xanthine oxidase

404

activity, induced by UV in skin.

405

Wang et al., (2009)51 reported that L. fermentum could keep pigs growing healthy by

406

increasing superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase activities and decreasing

407

malondialdehyde (MDA)levels in serum. Similarly, increased activity of hepatic catalase was

408

also observed with decreased MDA levels., The effect of supplemented diets on generation of

409

intestinal nitric oxide (NOx) and antioxidant activities with two strains of L. delbruckii subsp.

410

bulgaricus B3 and A13 which produced highest (211 mg/L) and lowest (27 gm/L) amount of

411

exopolysaccharide was studied73. Result showed that the small intestinal glutathione (GSH)

18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 48

Page 19 of 48

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

412

and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) was increased by administration of the

413

probiotic organisms, but amino-acid levels did not changed in either control or experimental

414

groups. Nitric oxide (NOx) also increased in both samples. Excessive amount of NOx may

415

contribute to lipid peroxidation because of increased ROS and reactive nitrogen species.

416

Antioxidative capacity of small intestine was ameliorated by administration of two strains of

417

L. delbruckii subsp.bulgaricus B3 and A13.Probiotic Dahi was prepared by co-culturing

418

selected strains of L. acidophilus and B. bifidum and Dahi culture in standardized buffalo

419

milk and evaluated its antioxidative effects on rats74. The activities of superoxide dismutase

420

(SOD) and catalase were determined in red blood cells (RBC) at monthly interval and in liver

421

and colorectal tissue at conclusion of experiment. The SOD activity in RBC increased with

422

probiotic Dahi but not with Indian Dahi. In addition, the catalase activity in RBC increased

423

with probiotic Dahi as well as normal Dahi and the former was more efficacious. In liver, the

424

SOD activity was stimulated by probiotic Dahi, while in colorectal tissue, both normal and

425

probiotic Dahi effectively stimulated SOD activity. Milk fermented with L. acidophilus and

426

B. bifidum when fed to rats, enhanced activity of SOD and decreased TBARS accumulation

427

in liver and colorectal tissue.

428

Probiotic Dahi containing L. acidophilusLaVK2 (La-Dahi) and B. bifidumBbVK3 (LaBb-

429

Dahi) alleviated age-inflicted accumulation of oxidation products, antioxidant enzymes and

430

improved expression of biomarkers of ageing in mice75.In this direction, La-Dahi or LaBb-

431

Dahi increased catalase (CAT) activity and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity in RBCs,

432

hepatic tissue and a significant decline in TBARS in plasma, kidney, hepatic tissues and

433

protein carbonyls in plasma of mice. Probiotic Dahi also reversed age related decline in

434

expression of biomarkers of ageing, peroxisome proliferators activated receptor-α,

435

senescence marker protein-30 (SMP-30) and Klotho in hepatic and kidney tissue. The

436

findings of this study suggested that probiotic Dahi containing selected strains of lactic acid

19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

437

bacteria can be used as potential nutraceutical intervention to combat oxidative stress and

438

molecular alterations associated with ageing. On the other hand, in vivo antioxidant activities

439

of selenium/zinc enriched probiotics preparation were studied using indigenous dogs (30 days

440

trial)76. In this study, two probiotic strains particularly L. acidophilus and Candida utilis,

441

highly tolerant to high concentration of inorganic Selenium (Se), Zinc (Zn), bile salts and low

442

pH conditions were used. Results of this study indicated that the SOD (P

Probiotics as potential antioxidants: a systematic review.

Probiotics are known for their health beneficial effects and are established as dietary adjuncts. Probiotics have been known for many beneficial healt...
702KB Sizes 0 Downloads 8 Views