Environmental Science
View Article Online View Journal
Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
This article can be cited before page numbers have been issued, to do this please use: X. Wei, J. Chen, Q. Xie, S. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Zhang and H. Xie, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2015, DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D.
This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the Royal Society of Chemistry peer review process and has been accepted for publication. Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after acceptance, before technical editing, formatting and proof reading. Using this free service, authors can make their results available to the community, in citable form, before we publish the edited article. We will replace this Accepted Manuscript with the edited and formatted Advance Article as soon as it is available. You can find more information about Accepted Manuscripts in the Information for Authors. Please note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the text and/or graphics, which may alter content. The journal’s standard Terms & Conditions and the Ethical guidelines still apply. In no event shall the Royal Society of Chemistry be held responsible for any errors or omissions in this Accepted Manuscript or any consequences arising from the use of any information it contains.
rsc.li/process-impacts
Page 1 of 21
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Table of contents entry
Cu(II) complexation altered the light absorption, direct photolytic pathways, 1O2 photo-generation ability, and the reactivity of H2CIP+ towards 1O2 by changing its molecular orbitals and atomic charge distribution.
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Page 2 of 21 View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Environmental impact To support 10 billion people in 2050, aquaculture and livestock breeding could be an important strategy. To ensure the production, thousands of tons of antibiotics and metal trace elements are used as feed additives per year and their combined pollution becomes more and more prominent. The interaction between them may affect the environmental behavior and ecotoxicology of antibiotics, and increase the uncertainty of risk assessment. As many antibiotics are resistant to microbial-degradation, photodegradation becomes pivotal in determining their fate and ecological risk. Here we proved that metal can complex with antibiotics, and then alter their photolytic reactivity and pathways. Additionally, we enlighten a computational approach to predict the photochemical behavior for antibiotics in different aqueous forms and clarify the photolytic mechanisms.
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 3 of 21
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts View Article Online
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
1
Photochemical Behavior of Antibiotics Impacted by Complexation Effects
2
of Concomitant Metals: A Case for Ciprofloxacin and Cu(II)†
3 4
Xiaoxuan Wei,a Jingwen Chen,∗a Qing Xie,a Siyu Zhang,ab Yingjie Li,a Yifei Zhang,a and
5
Hongbin Xiea
6
a
7
Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024,
8
China
9
b
10
Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering (MOE), School of
Key Laboratory of Pollution Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Applied
Ecology, Chinese Academy of Science, Shenyang 110016, China
11 12
Abstract
13
Many water bodies, especially those adjacent to aquaculture and livestock breeding areas,
14
are contaminated by both antibiotics and transition metals. However, the effects of the
15
interaction between antibiotics and transition metals on the environmental behavior and the
16
ecotoxicology of antibiotics are largely unknown. We hypothesized that antibiotics may
17
coordinately bind with metal ions, and this complexation may affect the environmental
18
photochemical behavior of antibiotics. We took ciprofloxacin (CIP) and Cu(II) as a case, and
19
employed simulated sunlight experiments and density functional theory calculations to
20
investigate the underlying reaction mechanisms. Results showed that monovalent cationic
21
ciprofloxacin (H2CIP+) that is predominant in the normal pH range (6~9) of surface waters, †
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: details of the total ion chromatograms and mass spectra of the identified products, the product yields, and the formation and degradation rate constants.
∗
Correspondence to: Jingwen Chen, e-mail:
[email protected]; Phone: +86-411-8470 6269
a
Dalian University of Technology
b
Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Science 1
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Page 4 of 21 View Article Online
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
22
can chelate with hydrated Cu(II) to form [Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+. Compared with H2CIP+,
23
[Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+ has different molecular orbitals, and atomic charge distribution. As a
24
result, [Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+ showed dissimilar light absorption properties, slower direct
25
photolytic rates, lower 1O2 generation ability and weaker reactivity towards 1O2. Due to the
26
Cu(II) complexation, the apparent photodegradation of H2CIP+ was inhibited, and the
27
photolytic pathways and product distribution were altered. This study implies that for accurate
28
ecological risk assessment of antibiotics under transition metal co-contamination conditions,
29
the effects of metal complexation should be considered.
30
Keywords: Photochemical behavior, Antibiotics, Metal complexation
31
Introduction
32
Antibiotics are of acute concern as they are pseudo-persistent in the aquatic environment1
33
and many of them can induce bacterial resistance even at environmental concentrations.2 In
34
recent years, the combined pollution of antibiotics and transition metals (Cu, Zn, Fe, etc.)
35
became evident, especially in natural waters adjacent to aquaculture and livestock breeding
36
areas where both trace elements and antibiotics are used as feed additives.3,4 For example, the
37
concentrations of some antibiotics and transition metals were up to 6.8 and 55.0 µg/L,
38
respectively, in coastal waters of the China Bohai bay due to marine aquaculture.5,6 The
39
molecular structures of most antibiotics, such as fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines, contain
40
heteroatoms (e.g., O and N). Theoretically, these antibiotics can coordinately bind with metal
41
ions, leading to the formation of metal complexes.7,8 The complexation may alter the
42
physicochemical properties (e.g., octanol-water partition coefficient) and chemical reactivity
43
of antibiotics.9,10 As a result, the environmental fate and ecotoxicology of antibiotics are
44
altered.11−13 Thus, it is of importance to explore the effects of complexation on the
45
environmental behavior and ecotoxicology of antibiotics, for the purpose of ecological risk
46
assessment of antibiotics under the combined pollution with transition metals. 2
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Page 5 of 21
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts View Article Online
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
47
Photochemical degradation has been proven to be a central factor in determining the
48
environmental fate of most antibiotics.14,15 In addition to direct photodegradation, some
49
antibiotics, such as fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines, can also photo-generate reactive
50
oxygen species (ROS, e.g., singlet oxygen 1O2 and hydroxyl radical ·OH), and be oxidized by
51
ROS produced by themselves (i.e. self-sensitized photooxidation) or by other water
52
constituents.16-18 Some previous studies have observed that metal ions could affect the
53
photolytic kinetics of antibiotics. For example, the photolytic rate constants (k) of tetracycline
54
at varied Mg(II) and Ca(II) concentrations relevant to the natural conditions were found to
55
vary by up to one order of magnitude.11 Clarithomycin and roxithromycin cannot directly
56
photodegrade in environmental waters as they do not absorb sunlight (λ > 290 nm),
57
nevertheless their Fe(III)-complexes undergo direct photolysis in sunlit waters.19
58
The mechanisms underlying the impact of metal complexation on the photodegradation of
59
antibiotics and other trace organic pollutants are largely unknown. We hypothesized that metal
60
complexation can have effects on the photochemical reactivity of antibiotics through the
61
following four ways: (1) As new chemical bonds are formed by complexation, the formed
62
metal complexes may have different light absorption characteristics; (2) The formed metal
63
complexes may have direct photolytic pathways that are different from the pathways of the
64
corresponding antibiotics; (3) The complexes and the corresponding antibiotics may have
65
different ROS generation abilities; and (4) The complexes and the corresponding antibiotics
66
may have different reactivity towards ROS.
67
In this study, we adopted ciprofloxacin (CIP, a widely used fluoroquinolone) and Cu(II) (a
68
common transition metal with strong complexing ability) as a case to verify the hypothesis. In
69
the normal pH range (6~9) of surface waters, monovalent cationic ciprofloxacin (H2CIP+) is
70
the predominant dissociation species of CIP.20 It can undergo both direct photolysis and
71
self-sensitized photooxidation via ROS (e.g., 1O2). Previous studies have observed that metals,
3
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Page 6 of 21 View Article Online
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
72
e.g. Cu(II), Zn(II), Fe(III), can affect the photodegradation of fluoroquinolones.21,22 However,
73
the underlying mechanisms are not clear and need clarification.
74
We employed fluorescence spectrophotometric titration and infrared spectrometry to
75
examine the complexation between CIP and Cu(II). Simulated sunlight experiments were
76
performed to explore the effects of Cu(II) complexation on the photochemical behavior of CIP.
77
In addition, density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed to provide
78
complementary insights into the impact of Cu(II) complexation on the photolysis of CIP.
79
Materials and methods
80
Chemicals and Reagents
81
Ciprofloxacin (CIP) with 98.0% purity was provided by Zhejiang Guobang Pharmaceutical
82
Co., Ltd. Deuterium oxide (D2O, 99.9%) and perinaphthenone (97% purity) were obtained
83
from Sigma-Aldrich. Furfuryl alcohol (FFA, 90% purity) was purchased from Shanghai
84
Jinshan Ting New Chemical Reagent Factory. Acetonitrile and trifluoroacetic acid were of
85
HPLC grade and purchased from Tedia Inc. Other reagents (purity > 99.0%) were purchased
86
from Kermel Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Ultrapure water (18 MΩ cm) was obtained from an
87
OKP ultrapure water system produced by Shanghai Lakecore Instrument Co., Ltd.
88
Characterization of the Complex
89
The complexation of CIP with Cu(II) in pH = 7.5 solutions was verified by a fluorescence
90
spectrophotometric titration technique. Fluorescence spectra were recorded using a Hitachi
91
F-4500 fluorescence spectrometer. Fluorescence intensity of the solutions at Ex/Em =
92
280/430 nm was used to calculate the complex ratio and the conditional stability constant (K'f)
93
on the basis of the Lineweaver-Burk equation13 (detailed in Text S1 of the Electronic
94
Supplementary Information, ESI).
95
To identify the complexation sites, the Cu(II)-CIP complex was prepared according to the
96
procedures reported by Zhang et al.13 (Text S2). IR spectra from 1% solid dispersions in KBr 4
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Page 7 of 21
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts View Article Online
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
97
were recorded by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (IR-Prestige-21, Shimadzu, Japan).
98
Photodegradation Experiments
99
The photolytic experiments were performed with an XPA-7 merry-go-round photoreactor
100
(Xujiang Electromechanical Plant, China). A water-refrigerated 1000 W xenon lamp
101
surrounded by Pyrex filters was used to simulate the sunlight with λ > 290 nm. The irradiance
102
measured by a UV-365 radiometer (Photoelectric Instrument Factory of Beijing Normal
103
University, China) was 294 µW/cm2 in the center of the tubes. All the CIP solutions (5
104
µmol/L) were adjusted to pH = 7.5 with HCl/NaOH only, so as to avoid the possible effects of
105
buffers.23 pH values were measured with a Mettler Toledo S40-K pH-meter equipped with an
106
InLab®Expert Pro combined electrode. The pH values changed slightly (< 0.5 pH units)
107
during the photolytic experiments. The ionic strength was controlled with NaCl (1 mmol/L).
108
UV-vis absorption spectra of CIP (5 µmol/L) were recorded via a Hitachi U-2900
109
spectrophotometer using a 1 cm cuvette. As the absorbance in the effective wavelength range
110
(290~400 nm) is > 0.02, all the observed photolytic rate constants were corrected for
111
light-screening.20
112
Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), a typical complexing agent (conditional stability
113
constant K'f,Cu(EDTA) = 1.0 × 1016 L/mol, pH = 7.5),24 was employed to assess the role of Cu(II)
114
complexation on the photodegradation of CIP. The direct photodegradation of CIP was
115
investigated in N2 saturated solutions. To examine the 1O2 generating ability of CIP irradiated
116
by simulated sunlight, FFA was used as a probe compound, and D2O was employed to
117
prolong the lifetime of 1O2.25 The steady-state concentration of 1O2 was calculated as follows:
118
[ 1O2 ] =
kFFA k1O2,FFA
(1)
119
where kFFA is the observed degradation rate constant for FFA, k1O2,FFA is the known reaction
120
rate constant for FFA with 1O2 (k1O2,FFA = 8.3 × 107 L mol−1s−1 in D2O),26 and [FFA]0 = 10
121
µmol/L. The reactivity of CIP towards 1O2 was assessed by a second-order reaction rate 5
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Page 8 of 21 View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
1
122
constant, k1O2. For the determination of k1O2, perinaphthenone was used as the
123
photosensitizer, and FFA as a reference compound (k1O2,FFA = 1.2 × 108 L mol−1s−1 in H2O).27
124
The initial concentrations of perinaphthenone, FFA and CIP were 20 µmol/L and the
125
concentration of Cu(II) was 40 µmol/L. A 300 W Hg lamp surrounded by 380 nm cut-off
126
filters was employed as the light source, under which the direct photodegradation of CIP and
127
FFA can be neglected, and CIP cannot photogenerate 1O2 as these compounds have no light
128
absorption at these conditions. The k1O2 value of CIP was calculated with the following
129
equation:
130
k1O2,CIP =
ln([CIP]t / [CIP]0 ) k1O2,FFA ln([FFA]t / [FFA]0 )
O2
(2)
131
Analytical Determinations
132
The concentration of CIP was determined by an Agilent 1100 HPLC with a ZORBAX
133
SB-C18 column (2.1 mm × 150 mm, 3.5 µm). CIP was excited at λ = 280 nm and recorded at
134
λ = 445 nm with a fluorescence detector. The mobile phases were acetonitrile (A) and
135
trifluoroacetic acid in water (pH = 2.4) with the following gradient elution: 5% A (0 min) to
136
20% A (3 min) to 40% A (15 min) to 5% A (17−20 min). For FFA, the detection wavelength
137
was 230 nm with a diode array detector, and the mobile phase was made up of 10%
138
acetonitrile and 90% H2O. The flow rate was 0.2 mL/min, injection volume was 5 µL, and
139
column temperature was 30 °C.
140
Photolytic products were separated by an Agilent 1200 HPLC. The gradient eluting
141
condition of HPLC was: 2% A (0 min) to 12% A (3 min) to 20% A (28 min) to 38% A (43 min)
142
to 2% A (44−50 min). The other separation conditions were the same as in case of the
143
analytical method of CIP. The accurate masses of the products were determined by an Agilent
144
6224 TOF mass spectrometer, and the mass spectral fragmentation patterns were examined by
145
an Agilent 6410B triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. The mass spectrometer conditions
146
were: ionization mode: ESI, positive mode; scan range: m/z 50−1000; drying gas flow: 9 6
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 9 of 21
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts View Article Online
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
147
L/min; drying gas temperature: 350 °C; fragmentor: 150 V; nebulizer pressure: 40 psi;
148
capillary voltage: 4000 V; skimmer voltage: 65 V; octapole radio frequency voltage: 750 V.
149
DFT Computation
150
All the calculations were performed with the Gaussian 09 program suite,28 using the M06-2X
151
hybrid meta exchange-correlation functional29 with the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set for C, N, O, F,
152
H, and the LanL2DZ pseudopotential30 and the basis set for Cu. The solvent effect of water
153
was considered by the integral equation formalism of the polarized continuum model
154
(IEFPCM) based on the self-consistent-reaction-field (SCRF) method.31 The possible
155
defluorination reactions were calculated for H2CIP+ (the dominant dissociation species of CIP
156
in pH = 7.5 solution) at the lowest excited triplet state (T),32,33 and for its Cu(II) complex at
157
the excited tripquartet state (4T, where the quartet superscript refers to the total spin of the
158
complex, T refers to the local multiplicity of H2CIP+).34,35 The excited-state geometries of
159
H2CIP+ and its Cu(II) complex were calculated by adjusting the spin multiplicity to 3 and 4,
160
respectively.36,37 Frequency calculations were performed to determine the character of
161
stationary points. Transition states (TS) were characterized with only one imaginary
162
vibrational frequency. Intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) analysis38 was executed to verify
163
that each TS uniquely connected the designated reactants with the products. Values of the
164
Gibbs free energy and the enthalpy were corrected by thermal energy at 298 K. Atomic
165
charges were evaluated by Mulliken charge analysis.39
166
Results and discussion
167
Complexation between Ciprofloxacin and Cu(II)
168
The fluorescence spectrophotometric titration results (Fig. S1) show that Cu(II) and CIP can
169
form a 1:1 complex with a conditional stability constant K'f,Cu(CIP) = 1.23 × 106 L/mol in pH =
170
7.5 solutions. As shown in Equation (3), the fraction of Cu(CIP) (αCu(CIP)) depends only on the
171
equilibrium concentration of the free Cu(II) ion ([Cu2+]). According to the previous studies of 7
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Page 10 of 21 View Article Online
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
172
Cu(II) speciation in natural waters, [Cu2+] is in the range of 10−6~10−16 mol/L at the
173
complexation equilibrium with organic matters.40−42 When [Cu2+] = 1 µmol/L, αCu(CIP) is about
174
55% (Fig. S2). These findings indicate that Cu(II) can significantly affect the chemical
175
speciation of CIP in some water bodies.
αCu(CIP) =
176
' K f,Cu(CIP) [Cu 2+ ] [Cu(CIP)] = ' [CIP] + [Cu(CIP)] 1 + K f,Cu(CIP) [Cu 2+ ]
(3)
177
We observed pronounced differences in IR spectra for CIP alone and CIP with the
178
coexistence of Cu(II) (Fig. S3). From the IR spectrum of CIP and the spectrum of the
179
Cu(II)-CIP complex, the C=O stretching vibration of the carboxyl group (~1710 cm−1)
180
disappeared, and a shift to low wavenumbers (from 1610 cm−1 to 1585 cm−1) was observed in
181
the carbonyl group.43,44 These IR spectra indicate the participation of the carboxyl and
182
carbonyl groups in the complexation of CIP with Cu(II). Thus, it is inferred that the ketonic
183
and carboxylate oxygen atoms of CIP bind directly with Cu(II).
184
We also optimized the structure of the Cu(II)-CIP complex by DFT calculation, and found
185
that Cu(II) is bound to six O atoms, with two coming from the carbonyl and the carboxyl
186
group of CIP and four from water molecules (Fig. 1). Thus, H2CIP+ (the dominant
187
dissociation species of CIP in pH = 7.5 solution) can chelate with hydrated Cu(II) to form
188
[Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+.
189 190
Fig. 1 Complexing reaction between H2CIP+ and [Cu(H2O)6]2+
191 192
Effects of Cu(II) Complexation on the Apparent Photodegradation Kinetics in Aerated 8
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Page 11 of 21
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts View Article Online
193
Solutions
194
In the dark control experiments, the loss of CIP [either in the presence or absence of Cu(II)
195
and/or EDTA] was < 3%. Thus, the degradation by other processes was negligible during the
196
photolytic experiments. Linear regression of ln(Ct/C0) vs time (t) showed that the
197
photodegradation of CIP follows pseudo-first order kinetics (r > 0.99, p < 0.05). The apparent
198
photolytic rate constants (k) of CIP under different conditions are shown in Fig. 2. With the
199
concentration of Cu(II) increasing from 0 to 20 µmol/L, the k values decreased from 1.21 ±
200
0.03 to 0.21 ± 0.02 h−1, indicating that Cu(II) significantly inhibits the photodegradation of
201
H2CIP+. However, with the coexistence of Cu(II) (10 µmol/L) and EDTA (20 µmol/L), the k
202
value is similar to that in pure water. Under this condition, Cu(II) mainly chelates with EDTA
203
(> 99.9%) instead of CIP, as K'f,Cu(EDTA) is about ten orders of magnitude higher than K'f,Cu(CIP).
204
Additionally, the k values are nearly the same for CIP dissolved in pure water and in the
205
solution with coexistence of EDTA, indicating that EDTA does not interfere with the apparent
206
photodegradation of H2CIP+. Thus, we found that Cu(II) affects the apparent
207
photodegradation of H2CIP+ mainly through its complexation with H2CIP+. CIP + Cu(II) CIP + EDTA CIP + Cu(II) + EDTA pH = 7.5
1.6 1.2 -1
k (h )
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
0.8 0.4 0.0
208
0.0
2.5 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 [Cu(II)] (µmol/L)
209
Fig. 2 Effects of Cu(II) and EDTA on the apparent photolytic rate constants (k) of CIP in
210
aerated solutions ([CIP]0 = 5 µmol/L, [EDTA] = 20 µmol/L. The error bars represent the 95%
211
confidence interval, n = 3)
9
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Page 12 of 21 View Article Online
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
212
Effects of Cu(II) Complexation on the Light Absorption Characteristics
213
The UV-vis absorbance spectra of CIP at various Cu(II) concentrations are shown in Fig. S4.
214
In the presence of Cu(II), the short wavelength absorption band (λmax ≈ 275 nm) of CIP
215
showed a red shift with its intensity increasing, and the broad absorption band (around
216
310~335 nm) displayed a blue shift.
217
We employed DFT to calculate the molecular orbital composition for the main absorptions
218
of H2CIP+ and [Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+ (oscillator strengths > 0.1). As shown in Table S1, the
219
lowest-lying absorption (λ = 322.3 nm) for H2CIP+ corresponds to the transition from the
220
highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital
221
(LUMO). For [Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+, in contrast, the lowest-lying absorption (λ = 315.5 nm)
222
corresponds to the transitions both from the second highest occupied molecular orbital
223
(HOMO−1) to HOMO and from HOMO to LUMO. The difference in the light absorption
224
between H2CIP+ and [Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+ can be further rationalized by inspection of their
225
relevant orbital structures. As shown in Fig. S5, the lowest-lying excitation for H2CIP+ is of a
226
π,π* nature. For [Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+, the excitation involves both charge transfer transition
227
from the ligand to the metal and d,d transition. Thus, the Cu(II) complexation can alter the
228
molecular orbital components of the excitation and orbital structures, which causes
229
[Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+ to show different light absorption characteristics from H2CIP+.
230
Effects of Cu(II) Complexation on the Direct Photolytic Pathways
231
As shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3, the direct photolytic rates (determined in N2-saturated solutions)
232
of CIP with and without Cu(II) are higher than the corresponding apparent photolytic rates
233
(determined in the aerated solutions) due to the removal of dissolved oxygen, an excited
234
triplet quencher. The direct photolytic rate constant (kd) of CIP was decreased in the presence
235
of Cu(II), indicating that Cu(II) can significantly inhibit the direct photodegradation of
236
H2CIP+. We identified two defluorination products (P288 and P330) formed in the direct
10
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Page 13 of 21
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts View Article Online
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
237
photodegradation of CIP (Table S2 and Fig. S6). The evolution of the products in the absence
238
and presence of Cu(II) is depicted in Fig. 4. With the co-existence of Cu(II), the formation of
239
P288 was slightly suppressed, and the generation of P330 was significantly inhibited.
240
According to our previous study, P288 was generated by cleavage of the C−F bond, and P330
241
was formed by OH− addition.20 Thus, the Cu(II) complexation inhibited the direct
242
photodegradation of H2CIP+ mainly through lowering its reactivity towards OH−. As the
243
molecular structures of P288 and P330 (Fig. 4) contain carbonyl and carboxyl groups, P288
244
and P330 may also chelate with Cu(II), and the photodegradation of P288 and P330 could be
245
impacted by the concomitant Cu(II) as well.
9
CIP + EDTA CIP + Cu(II) + EDTA
CIP CIP + Cu(II) pH = 7.5
6
3
0
kd -1
(h )
246
1
13
[ O2] × 10 -1 (mol L )
-5
k1O2,CIP × 10 -1
-1
(L mol s )
247
Fig. 3 Effects of Cu(II) and EDTA on the direct photolytic rate constant (kd, determined in
248
N2-saturated solutions), steady concentration of 1O2 and bimolecular rate constants of CIP
249
with 1O2 (For the determination of kd and [1O2], [CIP]0 = 5 µmol/L, [Cu(II)] = [FFA]0 = 10
250
µmol/L, [EDTA] = 20 µmol/L. For the determination of k1O2,CIP, [CIP]0 = [FFA]0 = 20 µmol/L,
251
[Cu(II)] = 40 µmol/L, [EDTA] = 80 µmol/L. The error bars represent the 95% confidence
252
interval, n = 3)
253 254
We further employed the DFT calculation to simulate the C−F bond cleavage and OH−
255
addition reactions for H2CIP+ and [Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+, for which the results are detailed in
11
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Page 14 of 21 View Article Online
256
Text S3 and Table S3. The activation free energies (∆G‡) for the C−F bond cleavage of
257
H2CIP+ and [Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+ are 27.3 and 32.8 kcal/mol, respectively. As shown in Fig.
258
S7, there is no significant difference in the calculated C−F bond lengths and atomic charges
259
on F between the two species. Thus, the Cu(II) complexation has negligible effects on the
260
C−F bond cleavage of H2CIP+. For OH− addition, ∆G‡ of [Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+ (10.8 kcal/mol)
261
is about 2 times higher than that of H2CIP+ (Table S3). Since the OH− addition is a
262
nucleophilic attack, we calculated the atomic charges on C12 (qC12). As shown in Fig. S8, qC12
263
of [Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+ was about half of that of H2CIP+. Thus, we conclude that the lower
264
reactivity of [Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+ with OH− is to be ascribed to the charge rearrangement of
265
H2CIP+ caused by the complexation.
266 O
O
O
NH2
N H
OH
N
N
N
HN
P288 P288 (CIP + Cu(II))
400
O
HO
OH
500
Peak area
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
P330 P330 (CIP)
P288 (CIP)
300 pH = 7.5
P288 (CIP + Cu(II))
200 P330 (CIP)
100 P330 (CIP + Cu(II))
0 0.0 267
0.2
0.4
0.6 0.8 (C0-Ct)/C0
1.0
268
Fig. 4 Molecular structures and evolution profiles for the photoproducts from direct
269
photolysis (determined in N2-saturated solutions) of CIP with and without Cu(II), where
270
[CIP]0 = 5 µmol/L, [Cu(II)] = 10 µmol/L, and (C0−Ct)/C0 indicates the proportion of CIP
271
consumed at time t
272 12
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Page 15 of 21
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts View Article Online
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
273
Effects of Cu(II) Complexation on the 1O2 Reactions
274
As shown in Fig. 3, with the co-existence of Cu(II), both the steady concentration of 1O2
275
([1O2]) and the bimolecular rate constants of CIP with 1O2 (k1O2,CIP) were lower, implying that
276
[Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+ has a lower 1O2 generation ability and weaker reactivity towards 1O2. In
277
a previous study on phototoxic potential of norfloxacin, Martinez et al. also observed that the
278
1
279
and P263) were identified in the 1O2 oxidation reactions of CIP with and without Cu(II)
280
(Table S2 and Fig. S6). According to the molecular structures of these products, the 1O2
281
oxidation mainly occurs at the piperazine ring of CIP. As shown in Fig. 5, the presence of
282
Cu(II) enhanced the production of P306, and decreased the generation of P334. Thus, the
283
Cu(II) complexation can not only inhibit the reactivity of CIP towards 1O2, but also alter the
284
oxidation product distribution. It deserves mentioning that as the molecular structures of P306,
285
P334 and P263 (Fig. 5) contain carbonyl and carboxyl groups, these products may also
286
chelate with Cu(II), and the complexes may have different 1O2 reactivity compared with the
287
ligands.
O2 yields were depressed in the presence of Ca(II) and Mg(II).45 Three products (P306, P334
288
According to Leach et al.46 and Gollnick et al.47, 1O2 is an electrophile that can oxidize
289
unsaturated C=C bonds and amino N atoms. The attack of 1O2 is expected to primarily occur
290
at molecular sites with the highest electron density. Our DFT calculation results show that for
291
the two CIP species, the largest negative atomic charges are located at N15 and N18 of the
292
piperazine ring (Table S4). Previous DFT calculation studies also indicated that the N atoms
293
of levofloxacin and norfloxacin bear negative charges.48,49 The calculated atomic charges
294
imply that N15 and N18 are the preferred sites for attack of 1O2, and the identified products also
295
confirmed this preference. For H2CIP+, the charges on N15 and N18 are −0.63e and −0.61e,
296
respectively, indicating that N15 and N18 have similar reactivity towards 1O2. In the case of
297
[Cu(H2CIP)(H2O)4]3+, the charge on N15 (−0.68e) is more negative than that on N18 (−0.58e),
13
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Page 16 of 21 View Article Online
298
which implies that 1O2 may attack N15 more favorably than N18. The evolution of the two
299
products, P306 formed from the attack at N15 and P334 formed from the attack at N18 (Fig. 5),
300
supports the results suggested by the atomic charges. Thus, this study also found that the
301
Cu(II) complexation can alter the 1O2 oxidation reaction pathways of CIP due to the
302
rearrangement of atomic charges. O
1000
NH2
O
O
F
OH
N H
N HN
O
O
F
F
OH
N H
O P306 (CIP + Cu(II))
Peak area
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
N
H2N
O OH
N
P263 (CIP + Cu(II))
P334 (CIP)
750 P306 (CIP + Cu(II)) pH = 7.5
P306 (CIP)
500
P263 (CIP + Cu(II)) P263 (CIP) P334 (CIP)
250
P334 (CIP + Cu(II))
0 0.0 303
0.2
0.4
0.6 0.8 (C0-Ct)/C0
1.0
304
Fig. 5 Molecular structures and evolution profiles for the 1O2 photooxidation products of CIP
305
with and without Cu(II), where [Perinaphthenone]0 = [CIP]0 = 20 µmol/L, [Cu(II)] = 40
306
µmol/L, and (C0−Ct)/C0 indicates the proportion of CIP consumed at time t
307
Implications
308
In natural waters, Cu(II) can not only complex with CIP, but also with the concomitant
309
dissolved organic matter (DOM).50 According to the studies of Ahmed et al.41 and Lofts et
310
al.42 on the copper-speciation in freshwaters over a wide range of metal-organic matter ratios,
311
the concentration of free bivalent copper ion ([Cu2+]) under equilibrium conditions is in the
312
range of 10−6~10−16 mol/L. As shown in Fig. 2, the k value in the solution with the total
14
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Page 17 of 21
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts View Article Online
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
313
concentration of Cu(II) ([Cu(II)]) = 2.5 µmol/L, where [Cu2+] is 0.5 µmol/L and is within the
314
range of [Cu2+] in natural waters, is lower than that in pure water. Thus, the Cu(II)
315
complexation can inhibit the apparent photodegradation of H2CIP+ under the environmental
316
conditions.
317
This study also found that Cu(II) complexation can alter the light absorption, direct
318
photolytic pathways, 1O2 photo-generation ability, and the reactivity of H2CIP+ towards 1O2.
319
As the 1O2 photo-generation ability of H2CIP+ was inhibited by the complexation, it can be
320
inferred that the photosensitized toxicity51 of H2CIP+ may also be altered by Cu(II)
321
complexation. As the photolytic pathways and product distribution were also altered by the
322
complexation, it can be assumed that the photomodified toxicity51 of H2CIP+ may be altered
323
too. Certainly, in addition to the photosensitized and photomodified toxicity, the toxicity of
324
Cu(II), H2CIP+ and the photoproducts can also be impacted by the complexation. Zhang et al.
325
investigated the toxicity of CIP and oxytetracycline to Scenedesmus obliquus and Vibrio
326
fischeri, and found that in the presence of the transition metals Cu(II), Zn(II) and Cd(II), the
327
formed complexes are commonly more toxic than the corresponding metals or ligands.13 Thus,
328
the complexation of concomitant Cu(II) can alter the environmental risk of H2CIP+. For
329
accurate risk assessment of antibiotics in the presence of metals, it is of importance to
330
understand the effect of metal complexation on their environmental behavior and toxicology.
331
According to our previous studies,20 CIP may exhibit five dominant dissociation forms in
332
water. The different dissociation species of CIP can chelate with different metal ions to form
333
distinct complexes.52 At different pH conditions, the impacts of Cu(II) on the apparent
334
photolytic rate constants of CIP are dissimilar (Fig. S9), suggesting that the effects of Cu(II)
335
complexation on the photodegradation of CIP in its different dissociation forms are distinct.
336
As shown in Fig. S10 and Fig. S11, due to complexation mainly, Ca(II) and Fe(III) can also
337
inhibit the apparent photolysis of CIP in pH = 7.5 aerated solutions. The order of inhibition
15
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Page 18 of 21 View Article Online
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
338
strength was Cu(II) > Fe(III) > Ca(II). Thus, it can be concluded that one specific metal ion
339
can have different complexation effects on the photochemical behavior of different organic
340
pollutants and their different dissociation species; and different metal ions have different
341
impacts on the photochemical behavior of a specific organic pollutant. More studies are
342
needed to understand the general effects of metal complexation on the photochemical
343
behavior of organic micropollutants. Given the huge and ever-increasing number of organic
344
pollutants,4 it is also necessary to develop computational models that can predict the aquatic
345
photochemical behavior of organic pollutants and their different dissociation and metal
346
complexation forms.
347
Acknowledgements
348
We thank Prof. Dr. Willie Peijnenburg (Leiden University) for improving the English
349
expression and suggestions. The study was supported by the National Basic Research
350
Program (2013CB430403) and National Natural Science Foundation (21137001, 21325729)
351
of China.
352
Notes and references
353
1
354
8211-8217.
355
2
356
Pathog., 2011, 7, e1002158.
357
3
358
Environ. Int., 2008, 34, 1215-1226.
359
4
360
Gunten, B. Wehrli, Science, 2006, 313, 1072-1077.
361
5
G.T. Ankley, B.W. Brooks, D.B. Huggett, J.P. Sumpter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2007, 41,
E. Gullberg, S. Cao, O.G. Berg, C. Ilback, L. Sandegren, D. Hughes, D.I. Andersson, Plos.
A. Sapkota, A.R. Sapkota, M. Kucharski, J. Burke, S. McKenzie, P. Walker, R. Lawrence,
R.P. Schwarzenbach, B.I. Escher, K. Fenner, T.B. Hofstetter, C.A. Johnson, U. von
S.C. Zou, W.H. Xu, R.J. Zhang, J.H. Tang, Y.J. Chen, G. Zhang, Environ. Pollut., 2011,
16
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Page 19 of 21
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts View Article Online
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
362
159, 2913-2920.
363
6
W. Meng, Y.W. Qin, B.H. Zheng, L. Zhang, J. Environ. Sci., 2008, 20, 814-819.
364
7
A. Serafin and A. Stanczak, Russ. J. Coord. Chem., 2009, 35, 81-95.
365
8
M.O. Schmitt and S. Schneider, Phys. Chem. Comm., 2000, 3, 42-55.
366
9
D.L. Ross, S.K. Elkinton, S.R. Knaub, C.M. Riley, Int. J. Pharm., 1993, 93, 131-138.
367
10 W.R. Chen and C.H. Huang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009, 43, 401-407.
368
11 J.J. Werner, W.A. Arnold, K. McNeill, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2006, 40, 7236-7241.
369
12 Z. Simon, B. Katja, U. Darko, V. Marjan, K. Albin, J. Pharmaceut. Biomed., 2010, 53,
370
655-659.
371
13 Y. Zhang, X.Y. Cai, X.M. Lang, X.L. Qiao, X.H. Li, J.W. Chen, Environ. Pollut., 2012,
372
166, 48-56.
373
14 Y. Li, J.F. Niu, W.L. Wang, Chemosphere, 2011, 85, 892-897.
374
15 L.K. Ge, J.W. Chen, J. Lin, X.Y. Cai, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009, 43, 3101-3107.
375
16 S.W. Yan and W.H. Song, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2014, 16, 697-720.
376
17 L.K. Ge, J.W. Chen, X.X. Wei, S.Y. Zhang, X.L. Qiao, X.Y. Cai, Q. Xie, Environ. Sci.
377
Technol., 2010, 44, 2400-2405.
378
18 J.K. Challis, M.L. Hanson, K.J. Friesen, C.S. Wong, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts,
379
2014, 16, 672-696.
380
19 D. Vione, J. Feitosa-Felizzola, C. Minero, S. Chiron, Water Res., 2009, 43, 1959-1967.
381
20 X.X. Wei, J.W. Chen, Q. Xie, S.Y. Zhang, L.K. Ge, X.L. Qiao, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
382
2013, 47, 4284-4290.
383
21 M.C. Cuquerella, A. Belvedere, A. Catalfo, M.A. Miranda, J.C. Scaiano, G. de Guidi, J.
384
Photoch. Photobio. B, 2010, 101, 295-303.
385
22 U. Hubicka, J. Krzek, B. Zuromska, M. Walczak, M. Zylewski, D. Pawlowski, Photoch.
386
Photobio. Sci., 2012, 11, 351-357.
17
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Page 20 of 21 View Article Online
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
387
23 M. Mella, E. Fasani, A. Albini, Helv. Chim. Acta, 2001, 84, 2508-2519.
388
24 G.D. Christian, Analytical Chemistry, 6th ed, Wiley, New York, 2007.
389
25 F. Wilkinson, W.P. Helman, A.B. Ross, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1995, 24, 663-1021.
390
26 D.E. Latch, B.L. Stender, J.L. Packer, W.A. Arnold, K. McNeill, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
391
2003, 37, 3342-3350.
392
27 W.R. Haag, J. Hoigne, E. Gassman, A.M. Braun, Chemosphere, 1984, 13, 631-640.
393
28 M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria, M.A. Robb, J.R. Cheeseman, G.
394
Scalmani, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, G.A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X. Li, H.P.
395
Hratchian, A.F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino, G. Zheng, J.L. Sonnenberg, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K.
396
Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, T.
397
Vreven, J.A. Montgomery, Jr., J.E. Peralta, F. Ogliaro, M. Bearpark, J.J. Heyd, E. Brothers,
398
K.N. Kudin, V.N. Staroverov, R. Kobayashi, J. Normand, K. Raghavachari, A. Rendell, J.C.
399
Burant, S.S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, M. Cossi, N. Rega, J.M. Millam, M. Klene, J.E. Knox, J.B.
400
Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R.E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A.J.
401
Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J.W. Ochterski, R.L. Martin, K. Morokuma, V.G. Zakrzewski,
402
G.A. Voth, P. Salvador, J.J. Dannenberg, S. Dapprich, A.D. Daniels, O. Farkas, J.B. Foresman,
403
J.V. Ortiz, J. Cioslowski, D.J. Fox, Gaussian 09, Revision A.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford,
404
CT (2009).
405
29 Y. Zhao and D.G. Truhlar, Theor. Chem. Acc., 2008, 120, 215-241.
406
30 P.J. Hay and W.R. Wadt, J. Chem. Phys., 1985, 82, 270-283.
407
31 J. Tomasi, B. Mennucci, R. Cammi, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 2999-3093.
408
32 S. Monti, S. Sortino, E. Fasani, A. Albini, Chem.-Eur. J., 2001, 7, 2185-2196.
409
33 A. Albini and S. Monti, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2003, 32, 238-250.
410
34 X.W. Yan and D. Holten, J. Phys. Chem.-Us., 1988, 92, 5982-5986.
411
35 M.H. Ha-Thi, N. Shafizadeh, L. Poisson, B. Soep, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2013, 117,
18
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D
Page 21 of 21
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts View Article Online
Published on 09 June 2015. Downloaded by North Dakota State University on 24/06/2015 14:00:24.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
412
8111-8118.
413
36 K. Nozaki, K. Takamori, Y. Nakatsugawa, T. Ohno, Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45, 6161-6178.
414
37 F. Wang and T. Ziegler, J. Chem. Phys., 2005, 122, 074109.
415
38 K. Fukui, Accounts Chem. Res., 1981, 14, 363-368.
416
39 R.S. Mulliken, J. Chem. Phys., 1955, 23, 2338-2342.
417
40 C. Fortin, Y. Couillard, B. Vigneault, P.G.C. Campbell, Aquat. Geochem., 2010, 16,
418
151-172.
419
41 I.A.M. Ahmed, J. Hamilton-Taylor, S. Lofts, J.C.L. Meeussen, C. Lin, H. Zhang, W.
420
Davison, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47, 1487-1495.
421
42 S. Lofts and E. Tipping, Environ. Chem., 2011, 8, 501-516.
422
43 J. Coates, Interpretation of infrared spectra, a practical approach, John Wiley and Sons,
423
New York, 2000.
424
44 P. Trivedi and D. Vasudevan, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2007, 41, 3153-3158.
425
45 L. Martinez, P. Bilski, C.F. Chignell, Photochem. Photobiol., 1996, 64, 911-917.
426
46 A.G. Leach and K.N. Houk, Chem. Commun., 2002, 1243-1255.
427
47 K. Gollnick and J.H.E. Lindner, Tetrahedron Lett., 1973, 14, 1903-1906.
428
48 B. De Witte, H. Van Langenhove, K. Hemelsoet, K. Demeestere, P. De Wispelaere, V.
429
Van Speybroeck, J. Dewulf, Chemosphere, 2009, 76, 683-689.
430
49 K.A.K. Musa and L.A. Eriksson, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2009, 113, 10803-10810.
431
50 K. Ndungu, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2012, 46, 7644-7652.
432
51 M. Grote, G. Schüürmann, R. Altenburger, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2005, 39, 4141-4149.
433
52 B. Urbaniak and Z.J. Kokot, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2009, 647, 54-59.
19
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Accepted Manuscript
DOI: 10.1039/C5EM00204D