Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 95.159.71.33 on 10/23/15 from IP address 95.159.71.33. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

305

Case Report

Pericaliceal

Varices

Jonathan

Andrew

J. Trambert,1

A patient with intrarenal

Due to the Nutcracker

M. Rabin,1’2

vanices simulating

Kenneth

a transitional

L. Weiss,3

cell

carcinoma is described. The vanices presumably were related to venous hypertension caused by extrinsic compression of the left renal vein between the superior mesentenic artery and

the aorta

(the

nutcracker

phenomenon).

This

rare

entity

should be considered in the differential diagnosis of caliceal filling defects seen on IV urognaphy. MR imaging cleanly showed the vascular abnormalities in this patient, and therefore may be useful in the noninvasive evaluation of patients

suspected

Case

of having the nutcracker

phenomenon.

Report

A 44-year-old woman had a several-year history of intermittent left flank and abdominal pain without hematunia. An IV urogram showed a lobulated filling defect in the lower pole calix of the left kidney (Fig. 1 A).

No

pelvic

or

ureteral

notching

was

identified.

A

retrograde

pyelogram showed no abnormality, but specimens obtained by transureteral brushing of the renal pelvis initially were interpreted as suspicious for transitional cell carcinoma. On review, this impression was revised to dysplasia without definite evidence oftumor. Cytologic examinations of subsequent ureteral washings and voided urine samples showed no abnormal cells. CT with and without IV contrast material showed no discrete evidence of intrarenal mass, only questionable effacement of fat around the lower pole calix. In order to exclude neovascularity or vessel encasement caused by a small urothelial tumor, an arteriogram was performed, which showed neithen. However, the left renal vein was not visualized, and opacification of peniureteric and other retroperitoneal collateral veins was evident. There also was a suggestion of vanices within the lower pole of the Received

July 10, 1 989; accepted

after revision

September

Phenomenon

and Arnold

B. Tein4

Retrospective

evaluation

kidney.

ofthe

CT study raised

the possibility

of compression of the left renal vein between the superior mesenteric artery and the aorta. Small netroperitoneal densities that presumably corresponded to collateral veins also were noted on the CT scans. A left renal venogram showed a racemose plexus of varicose veins overlying

the

lower

pole

calix,

compression

of the

left

renal

vein,

and

filling of retroperitoneal collateral veins (Fig. 1 B). A pressure gradient of 4 mm Hg was measured between the left renal vein and the inferior

vena cava. The gradient between the right renal vein and the inferior vena cava was less than 0.5 mm Hg. Having been reassured that the lower pole caliceal filling defects were the result of extrinsic compression by venous varices rather than tumor, the patient agreed to return for MA, which clearly showed the retropentoneal and intrarenal varices, as well as the compression of the left renal vein between the superior mesenteric artery and the aorta (Figs. 1C and I D). The study was performed at 1 .5 T; superior and inferior saturation pulses were used, with respiratory compensation. The Ti -weighted spin-echo images (600/20) were the most informative.

Discussion

The nutcracker phenomenon has been recognized only recently in the literature [1 2]. The usual clinical presentation is hematunia with on without associated left flank pain, and sometimes left flank or back pain alone. IV unography is frequently normal, but the most common abnormal finding is ,

ureteral or pelvic notching due to extrinsic pressure from netnoperitoneal collateral veins. When hematuria is present, unilateral

bleeding

from the left uretenal

6, 1989.

orifice

is usually

noted

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, J. D. Weiler Hospital of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1825 Eastchester Ad., Bronx, NY 10461 . Address reprint requests to J. J. Trambert. 2 Present address: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, One Gustav L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029. 3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Division, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1201 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, NY 10461. 4

Department

AJR 154:305-306,

of Urology,

The Albert

Einstein

College

of Medicine,

February 1990 0361-803X/90/1542-0305

1 180 Morris

Park Ave.,

Bronx,

C American Roentgen Ray Society

NY 10461.

TRAMBERT

Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 95.159.71.33 on 10/23/15 from IP address 95.159.71.33. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

306

A

ET AL.

AJR:154, February 1990

B

Fig. 1.-A, Tomographic image from an IV urogram shows lobular filling defects in lower pole calix and infundibulum (arrow). B, Selective left renal venogram shows intrarenal vances (arrow) corresponding to location of lower pole calix. Note penureteric veins and other retroperitoneal venous collaterals (arrowheads). C, Parasagittal MR image, 600/20, through medial aspect of left kidney shows tortuous retroperitoneal varices. LRV = left renal vein. D and E, Axial MR Images, 600/20, at level of renal vein (D) and lower pole calices (E) show compression of left renal vein (Xs) as it crosses between superior mesentenc artery (SMA) and aorta (Ao), retroperitoneal varices (black arrowheads), and intrarenal varices corresponding to those seen on venogram (white arrowheads). SMV = superior mesenteric vein; IVC = inferior vena cava.

on cystoscopy. The possibility of the nutcracker phenomenon in this patient was raised by the nonvisualization of the left renal vein and filling of netnopenitoneal collateral veins on selective arteniognaphy. The suspicion was reinforced by findings seen on the CT scans in retrospect and confirmed by selective renal venognaphy with pressure measurements. Beinart et al. [3] found a gradient of less than 1 mm Hg between the left renal vein and inferior vena cava in 49 of 50 normal subjects. The gradient of 4 mm Hg in our patient

therefore

can be considered

significantly

different

from non-

mal.

The differential

diagnosis

of irregular

caliceal filling defects

on IV unognaphy includes urothelial neoplasms; nadiolucent calculi; blood clots; and inflammatory conditions such as pyelitis cystica, tuberculosis, and leukoplakia. In this patient, the irregularity was caused by extrinsic pressure from pencaliceal vanices that probably provided collateral drainage between the upper part of the kidney and the lower-pressure penipelvic and peniunetenic veins. Rare cases have been re-

[4-6] in which intranenal vanices caused caliceal impressions simulating a neoplasm. In these cases, the intnarenal vanices apparently were considered to be idiopathic. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reported in which penicaliceal vanices have been attributed to the nutcracker phenomenon. ported

REFERENCES 1 . De Schepper A. Nutcracker fenomeen van de vena renalis en veneuze pathologie van de linker nier. J Beige Radio! 1972;55:507-51 1

2. Stewart BH, Aeiman G. Left renal venous hypertension “nutcracker syndrome. Urology 1982;20:365-369 3. Beinart C, Sniderman KW, Shozo T, et al. Left renal vein to inferior vena cava pressure relationships in humans. J Uro! 1982;127: 1070-1 071 4. Rosenthal JT, Costello P, Roth RA. varicosities of renal venous system. Urology 1980;15:427-429 5. Braedel HU, Haage H, Moeller JF, et al. Differential diagnostic importance of retrograde phlebography in cases of unusual ectasia and renal pelvic deformity. Radiology 1976;1 1 9: 65-68

6. Goswami AP. Anatomical variations of the renal veins with varicosity presenting as pseudotumor of the kidney. J Urol 1976;1 16:648-649

Pericaliceal varices due to the nutcracker phenomenon.

Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 95.159.71.33 on 10/23/15 from IP address 95.159.71.33. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved...
347KB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views