In the editorial on Creative the June issue you quote Mr. Adaflis as saying that "occupational therapy js tracts and absorbs while art therapy^ the use of the fine arts is a and unique aid to the mental Patie J recovery". There is nothing unique" in the rehabilitation of the
Therapy^
,
dyna^5
...
"dynamic a^j
n16!]^
His patient. reliability, discipline and painstaking aP"0f cation of the knowledge of a teaif1 j
hospital
demands
skilled
occupati^j
workers;
therapists,
nurses, doctors and psychiatric s&
.
contributes his or nJ quota of ability to the socialisationi a.e remotivation and attitude change of ^ mental patient, and to his retraining normal habits of life and work. OccUP^ tional therapists are comparative s comers to this team, but their role workers.
Each
developed rapidly.
They
are
no
\?
??
concerned with the occupation or distr.e tion of the patient alone. Instead jj a analysis and assessment of disabilities j, retraining in and preparation for ? and the activities of daily life is
^
210
1? doing ProvVp (i?,^uncti?nmore advanced
situaf-
this they centres) a
*n which at the same time the recovers confidence and a feeling
Patie ?n of
.
Th0*1 6
w?rthRr?vision
tive
bejn actiyity
is
a
of opportunity for creabasic need of human
f??d> entertainment, comfort suc^ ^ ^as an imPortant a mental patient and rrns Part of the occupational
and8S'
Place-?rkoften
thera
'f
Programme. Its claim to uniqify therapy over-simplifies the