Vol. 69, No. 2, 1976
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
ON THE EFFICACY OF COMMONLY USED RIBONUCLEASE INHIBITORS George H. Jones Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology Division of Biological Sciences University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
Received
January
27,1976 SUMMARY
The ability of a number of commonly used inhibitors to inhibit pancreatic ribonuclease has been studied. At ribonuclease concentrations of 10 or 100 g/ml, heparin, polyvinylsulfate and proteinase K, at concentrations reported for their use in the literature, were ineffective in inhibiting RNase digestion of 3H-uridine labelled RNA from Streptomyces antibioticus. In contrast, macaloid, diethylpyrocarbonate and sodium dodecyl sulfate were all effective inhibitors, with the degree of effectiveness decreasing in the order stated. Further, at inhibitor concentrations which allowed RNase conversion of only 50% of the labelled RNA to acid soluble products, a larger percentage of the acid insoluble di estion products sedimented in the "high molecular weight" range 9 4-16s) when macaloid was the inhibitor used than when diethylpyrocarbonate was the inhibitor. In recent from
years,
prokaryotic
effective
inhibitors
ding
dodecyl
2, 3),
6, 7), presumed their
thus
effective
reasoned
in
that benefit
terms
(PVS,
of
8, 9),
and it
inhibitor the
is
from
a direct
inhibitory
refs.
0 1976 by Academic Press, oj reproduclim in any form
Inc. reserrjed.
need for
heparin
dealing comparison These
469
K (5,
without
inclu(DEPC, (HEP, refs.
10).
It was
RNA isolation
of these studies
to
to determine
literature.
with
These
any reference
difficult
the available
activity.
A number
laboratories,
4, 5),
extremely
below.
Copy&f Ail rigtlrs
the
of RNA's
11, diethylpyrocarbonate
employed
literature
from
in various
and proteinase
are frequently ability
properties
to use in RNA isolation.
(SDS, ref.
(MAC, refs.
inhibitory
ques would tors
sulfate
in the
has accentuated
have been used
inhibitors
the most
cells
polyvinylsulfate
macaloid
interest
of ribonuclease
inhibitors
sodium
increased
and eukaryotic
of presumed
refs.
the
presumed are
techniinhibi-
described
VoL69,No.
2, 1976
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
- SDS was obtained
(135
Units/mg)
from
NL Industries
prepared with
from
Pancreatic
Methods
PVS from
and extracting
the
for
Tris-HCl,
1 and 2.
trations
was chosen
min at 30°, remaining
antibioticus (11).
experiments.
dried
and examined
by liquid
as percentage
in each assay
two RNase levels
added
above,
(2.5%)
or MAC (0.5
containing
were
(TCA)
collected
incubated
on glass
scintillation
legends
concenused
was added
in pubfor
5
to precipitate fibre
filters
counting. acid
In the absence
used was sufficient
mg/ml).
was extracted
gradient
0.3 ml incubations 10 pg/ml
Results
insoluble
of inhibitor,
to completely
were
RNase, and either
performed
solubi-
combined with
centrifugation
ethanol.
with
10 A260 units RNA thus
as described
470
as des-
no inhibitor,
At the end of the incubation, (ll),
tRNA and precipitated sucrose
of inhibitor
of the original
tube.
in the
concentrations tubes
RNase,
RNA.
cribed
remaining
the
1.93 A260
per minute);
as indicated
acid were
remaining
'H-RNA,
counts
Assay
RNA precipitates
1 are expressed
in 0.1 ml reaction
the range
so as to encompass
In some experiments,
via
RNA was
described
10 umole;
and inhibitors
RNA.
each of the
coli
H-labelled
performed
precipitable
when 10% trichloroacetic
were
the
were
In each experiment,
RNA isolation
lize
3
Macaloid
of Streptomyces
pH 7.6,
to 6000 acid
to Figs.
counts
Biochemicals,
RNA as previously
RNase activity
1 or 10 F.rg (10 or 100 pg/ml)
in Fig.
cultures
DEPC and HEP
RNase was from Calbiochem.
(equivalent
which
General
Ltd.,
K from Merck.
12 hr old
containing:
lished
BDH Chemicals
and proteinase
- Assays
mixtures units
Sigma,
by incubating
3H-uridine
from
obtained previously
DEPC
the RNA of Escherichia was analyzed (12).
Vol.69,No.
2, 1976
BlOCHEMlCAL
INose
w’.’
,.* .. . .. . .. . *.-
al:
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
1DO rg/ml10 “g, ml ....’
..!!!!...a
.* . . . .. . .. . .. -W”’
DECC
........... l . . .. . . .. . .. . .. . . .. . .. . .. l
,
I I 1.0 15 CONCfNlfAlION
0.5 SDS or Df?C
I 20 i%vlvt
I
1.0
1.0 MAC or HfP ADDfD~mphll
- Abilities of various inhibitors to prevent solublization of &il!RN: by pancreatic RNase. Assay conditions were as described in Materials and Methods and inhibitors were present at the concentrations indicated. Results are expressed as the percentage of the add acid insoluble RNA remaining after the incubation.
RESULTS The data tested
of Fig.
to inhibit
pancreatic
can be seen that bition
at the
also
observed
assay
effective
the
presence
PVS and HEP were
that
proteinase employed
20% of the added
RNA.
of 43,
The data effective
presented
ineffective
In experiments
In contrast,
of DEPC and MAC prevented
At 10 pg/ml
not
of the RNase inhibitors
suggested tested.
471
shown,
it
inhibitor
was
under
At 100 ug/ml solubilization
the
RNase,
of about of about
SDS, DEPC and MAC prevented
49 and 67% of the added
above
at RNase inhi-
the solubilization
RNase,
It
SDS, DEPC and MAC were
the
SDS prevented
substances
at 10 or 100 ug/ml.
at some concentration.
RNA while
of the
K was an ineffective here.
inhibitors
of five
completely
used.
30% of the added
solublization
the ability RNase present
concentrations
conditions
all
1 depict
that
RNA, respectively.
DEPC and MAC were However,
the
assay
the most used mea-
Vol. 69,No.
2, 1976
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNlCATlONS
1.
‘? 0 x P $ O.!
fPACTlON
NUMBER
Fig. 2. - Sucrose gradient analysis of the RNA remaining after incubation of 3H-RNA with 10 g/ml RNase in the presence or absence of OEPC or MAC. See text for details of the incubation and RNA extraction. Gradients (5-201) were centrifuged for 13.5 hr at 36,000 rpm and were collected and assayed as described previously (12). Radioactivity values have been corrected for background and the direction of sedimentation is from right to left. The positions of 23s, 16s and 4s RNA's were determined using marker RNA prepared from E. coli cells and run on a parallel gradient.
sured
only
the ability
added
RNA to an acid
hibitormight allow
prevent
significant
molecular this
soluble
weight
complete
RNA which three
as described
centrifugation
equal
levels
of higher
the
insoluble
scale
(0.3
ml)
incubation in Fig.
against
added
an inRNA, but still
RNA to lower
10% TCA.
containing
To examine
and 10 pg/ml
were
no inhibitor, RNase.
The
by sucrose
In the
incubations
chosen
so as to produce
RNase, and in each case,
472
of the
RNase assay mixtures
and analyzed 2.
that
weight in
and Methods
of DEPC and MAC were
of protection
of the molecular
was still
conversion
seemed possible
MAC, respectively,
as described
the concentrations
It
in Materials
after
to prevent
solubilization
large
2.5% DEPC or 0.5 mg/ml RNA was extracted
inhibitor
form.
conversion
possibility,
prepared
of each
gradient
described,
about
about 50%
VoL69,No.
2, 1976
of the the
BIOCHEMICAL
RNA was recovered
recovery
quite
as compared
of TCA precipitable
similar
for
the
incubations
to lower
weight
sence
of MAC.
total
RNA recovered
5% of the RNA from
this
region.
the
cular
than
weight
fractions
in tubes
the
MAC in preventing
50% of
in the
pre-
of the
one observes
that
DEPC sediments the
Thus,
conversion
although
percentage
containing
cpm
RNA was converted
of DEPC than
1-13,
1-13.
2 that,
weight
one calculates
incubation
was
of about
37% of the RNA from
MAC is recovered
Fig.
solubilization
presence
In contrast,
effective
from
RNA in the
in gradient
gradients
DEPC and MAC (3500
molecular
if
In addition,
the sucrose
high
For example,
only
taining
complete
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
control.
containing
RNA, much more of the molecular
the
It is evident
DEPC and MAC prevented
the added
with
RNA from
and 3700 cpm, respectively). both
AND BIOPHYSICAL
incubation
DEPC is
of higher
in con-
somewhat to lower
less mole-
RNA by RNase.
DISCUSSION In summary, are
all
should
the data
presented
capable
of inhibiting
be noted,
however,
that
of each
bition
than
isolation culties
higher experiments
the (1,
under
inhibitor
This
employed
of SDS might
necessitate
of the
its
and since
with
RNA (13).
acidic
clay,
interfere ble
that
purified of the
with
Macaloid, whose the
MAC could
on the
presence
assay
SDS, DEPC and MAC
other
concentrations. conditions
required
concentrations
removal,
the
concentrations
4, 9).
when SDS and DEPC are
RNA for
that
RNase at appropriate
the concentrations were
indicate
may lead
RNA isolation,
repeated
in isolation
is
a relatively apparently
In addition,
it
be included
as an RNase inhibitor
RNA, and could be removed by centrifugation assays.
Although
473
they
are
high
to react inert
mixtures
of RNA.
to diffi-
precipita-
DEPC has been reported hand,
inhi-
in RNA
since
ethanol
preparation
RNA in biological
maximal
employed
observation for
employed,
to produce commonly
It
does
not
seems possi-
in solutions
of
prior
to the use
soluble
in aqueous
Vol. 69,No.
2, 1976
solutions, sent
BIOCHEMICAL
the
from
with
DEPC in preventing 2) would
RNA isolation
teinase tive
K, it at lower
conclude higher
that than
is
clear
in biological
the observation conversion
their
assays.
that
of higher
seem to make macaloid
the
that
other
presumed
may be argued
being
These
ab-
con-
MAC is more effective to lower
the
molecular
inhibitor
that
inhibitors these
RNase concentrations.
weight
of choice
one would
expect
Indeed,
tested the
are
used
to observe
even at this quite
same relative
tested,
substances
the RNase concentrations
that
inhibitors
conclude
require
in
procedures.
As regards
six
to be used
coupled
RNA (Fig.
it
of SDS and DEPC would
RNA solutions
siderations, than
properties
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
high
would
it
in these
in cellular
activity
It would
have been effec-
seems reasonable
RNase concentration,
effective.
PVS, HEP and pro-
to
experiments extracts.
However,
three
seems reasonable be manifested
were
of the to at lower
RNase concentrations. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This research the National
was supported Cancer Institute,
by Grant Number 2 ROl-CA12752-04, DHEW.
awarded
REFERENCES 1. 2.
11.
Girard, M. (1967), Methods. Enzymol. 12a, 581-588. Fedorcsak, I., Natarajan, A. T., and arenberg, L. (1969), Eur. J. Biochem. lo, 450-458. Rosen, C.-G. and Fedorcsak, I. (1966), Biochim. Biophys. Acta 130. 401-405. Mx; B., Koblet, H. and Gros, D. (1968), Proc. Nat1 . Acad. Sci. USA 59, 445-452. Cheng, T.-C., Polmar, S. K. and Kazazian, H. H., Jr. (19741, J. Biol. Chem. 249, 1781-1786. McKnight, G. S. andschimke, R. T. (1974), Proc. Nat 1. Acad. Sci. USA 71, 4327-43331. Schechter, I. (1974): Biochemistry 13, 1875-1885. Stanley, W. M. and Bock, R. M. (196v, Biochemistry 4, 1302-1311. Hancher, C. W., Pearson, R. L. and Kelmers, A. D. (1974), Methods Enzymol. 20e,-510-514.. Mach, B., Eust, C. and Vassalli, P. (1973), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA-70;451-455. J;r$si7;. H. and Weissbach, H. (1970), Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 137,
12. 13.
Jones, Oberg,
3. 4. 5. 6. i: 9. 10.
G: H. (1975) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 63, B. (1970), Biochim. Biophys. Acta 204, 430-44E
474
469-475.
by