Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematotogy. 1992; 12: 193-215 0 1992 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. AI1 rights reserved.

ONCHEM

193 1040-84281921S15.00

022

Myelodysplastic Pathogenesis,

syndromes

diagnosis and treatment

Pierre No&l” and Lawrence A. Solberg Jr.b “Division of Hematology and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mavo Foundation, Rochester, MN, and bSection of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA (Accepted

4 December

1991)

Contents 194

I.

Introduction

II.

Historical

III.

Classification

194

IV.

Etiology

195

V.

Clinical

VI.

.__....,..._......,._.,..,_.._........_._...,...__....

194

perspective

and pathogenesis

..

features

Laboratory

..

198 198

features

A. Peripheral

198

blood

,..._.................

B. Bone marrow C. Cellular

199 199

dysfunction

D. Cytogenetics

200

E.

200

Cell culture

VII.

Differential

VIII.

Prognosis

IX.

Treatment

201

diagnosis ..,.___.,,.,,__.._,..____..,._._........__....___._.....

201

............................................... A. Supportive care ....................................... ........................................ B. Glucocorticoids

202

C. Androgens

...........................................

203

D. Danazol

203

E.

............................................ Retinoic acid ......................................... 1,25Dihydroxyvitamin D, ...............................

203

F.

202 202

204

............................. ....................................... I. Erythropoietin 2. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor .....................

G. Recombinant

growth

Pierre NotI received a B.S. degree from McGill University, Canada, brooke, tology

and an M.D. degree Canada.

He is currently

and Internal

and an Assistant

from University

Medicine. Professor

a consultant Mayo

Sher-

in the Division of Hemaat Mayo

Rochester,

MN. Lawrence A. Solberg. Jr., received

University

of California,

Berkeley,

Montreal,

of Sherbrooke,

Clinic and Mayo

of Medicine

204

factors

Foundation.

Medical

Louis University Head

.

204

School of Medicine,

of the Section

Jacksonville, tine, Mayo

204

of Hematology

Jacksonville, Medical

St. Louis, MO. He is currently and Oncology

FL, and an Associate

School,

Rochester,

at Mayo

Professor

Clinic

of Medi-

MN.

School.

a PhD. from the

CA and an M.D. degree from St.

Correspondence: Rochester,

Dr. P. Noel,

MN 55905, USA.

Mayo

Clinic,

200 First

Street

S.W.,

194 3. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating 4. IL-3 ........................................................

factor ......................

x.

Interferons

XI.

Chemotherapy ..................................................... A. Low-dose cytarabine .............................................. B. Cytarabine and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor C. 5-Azacytidine ................................................... D. Conventional antileukemic therapy ....................................

206 206 206 207 207

XII.

Antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine

208

XIII.

Bone marrow transplantation

208

XIV.

Summary

208

. ..__......._......_.,...................__,..___....._

. . . .._.......__.....__.....__............___..._._.....

References................................................................

I. Introduction

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal hemopathies characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and cellular dysfunction. The majority of patients die of complications of marrow failure or acute leukemia. Several problems face the clinician managing patients with MDS. Diagnosis can be difficult because several diseases are associated with bone marrow dysplasia. In the absence of karyotypic abnormalities, it is often difficult to be confident of a diagnosis of refractory anemia. Some laboratory tests are available to establish the prognosis and risk of leukemic conversion. Unfortunately, few patients benefit from the results of these tests because of lack of effective therapy. Bone marrow transplantation and high-dose chemotherapy are the only current treatments that have the potential of reestablishing normal hematopoiesis. These are generally useful in the small subset of patients less than 45 years of age. II. Historical

205 205

perspective

The first cases of MDS were described by Luzzatto in 1907 [l] and Di Guglielmo in 1917 [2]. In 1941, Bomford and Rhoads [3] described 100 cases of refractory anemia (RA). In 1942, Chevallier [4] described the odoleucoses (frontiers of leukemia). Mallarme [5] described the hematologic findings preceding acute leukemia in 1949. In the same year, Hamilton-Paterson [6] described preleukemic anemia. In 1953, Block et al. [7] coined the term ‘preleukemia’. RA with ringed sideroblasts was first described by Bjijrkman in 1956 [8]. The presence of a double red cell population in this disorder was

206

208

observed by Dacie et al. in 1959 [9]. The term ‘smouldering leukemia’ was applied by Rheingold et al. [IO] in 1963 to the disease affecting elderly patients with 20% to 40% blasts in the bone marrow but only occasional blasts in the peripheral blood. RA with excess blasts was first described by Dreyfus et al. in 1970 [ll]. In 1972, Zittoun et al. [12] recognized chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) as a specific preleukemic state. In 1973, Saarni and Linman [13] described 34 patients in whom acute myeloid leukemia was preceded by a preleukemic phase. In 1976, the French-American-British Cooperative Group (FAB) [ 141 classified dyshematopoietic syndromes into two categories: RA with excess blasts and CMML. In 1982, the FAB defined the current five categories of MDS [15]. III. Classification

MDS have been classified by the FAB group [ 151into five categories: RA; RA with ringed sideroblasts (RARS); RA with excess blasts (RAEB); RA with excess blasts in transformation (RAEBIT); and CMML. This classification applies only to primary MDS and is based on the percentage of peripheral blood and bone marrow blasts as well as the presence or absence of ringed sideroblasts or Auer rods (Table 1). The FAB defines two types of blasts: Type I blasts have a prominent nucleolus with uncondensed chromatin pattern and absence of cytoplasmic granules. The nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio of the smaller blasts tends to be higher than that of the larger ones. Type II blasts have a few primary granules; their nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio tends to be lower and their nucleus remains in a central position. The Morphologic, Immunologic, and Cytogenetic

195 TABLE I Classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes, as proposed by the French-American-British Subtype

RA RARS RAEB RAEBIT CMML

Monocytes (~1). peripheral blood

no no no no > 1000

Ringed sideroblasts (%). marrow

< 15 > 15 no no no

Cooperative Group

Blast cells (%)

Auer rods, marrow

peripheral blood

marrow

Myelodysplastic syndromes. Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.

Our understanding of the biology of leukemia and myelodysplasia is still only partial. The diagnosis of myelodysplasia is often based on quantitative ...
3MB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views