VOL.
No.
123,
MAGNIFICATION
ANGIOGRAPHY*
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 118.32.86.246 on 06/20/16 from IP address 118.32.86.246. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
IDENTIFYING
THE OF
HARVEY
By
CAPSULAR
ACOUSTIC
I. WILNER,
NEUROMAS M.D.,
DETROIT,
‘J’HE
recent
spot ization seen
of by
We
have
utilizing
with
focal
giography
have
studied
within
MATERIAL
selective
the
several
tumor
confirmed microscope. AND
well acous-
had
been
successfully
in more neuromas, the
A preshaped catheter
was
confines.
the
right
surgically
ml.
Renografin
or
tra-arterially, at a flow sequence
artery
M.D.
performed
than only
benefit
of
patients
50
the
last
6
magnification
angiography.
angiogclus-
METHOD
vertebral
has
at our hospital with acoustic patients
magnification identified abnormal
AUSTIN,
MICHIGAN
visualnot
DONALD
and
techniques.
vessels were the dissecting
Although
small
excellent
structures
recently
vessels
of the
enabled
conventional
of
These
has
important
tic neuromas raphy and ters
perfection
tube
VASCULATURE
an-
onds,
3’
No.
French
selectively left
vertebral
6o per using
polyethylene
placed
cent an
into
artery.
was
2
films
automatic
every
to
injected
rate of 3 ml. per second. extended over a period
exposing
either Six
second
7
in-
injector
The of
10
for
film secthe
Harvey
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 118.32.86.246 on 06/20/16 from IP address 118.32.86.246. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
32
3 seconds, remainder
initial
for the
then of the
Magnification Siemens
speed
0.2
film,
film study.
I
factors mm.
each
of the
to the
Transfacial
the most
at
providing
cation, against
produce
least
the
lower and
informative
tube
the
of
high-
neuromas
physicians
with
Positive ele40
magnifi-
head
auditory
1975
to
provide
diagnostic
testing,
hearing
chal-
agraphy,
and well
myelography
described
ments
caused
of
not
eleclamin-
have
changes3’4
pathognomonic
of a cerebellopontine Vertebral angiography understanding
particularly
loss, abnormal characteristic
tronystagmography, been
is gave
continue
a difficult
discriminatory
border. projections
JANUARY,
lenge.
kilovoltage
3 times patient’s
views.
Austin
DISCUSSION
use
tube,
grid,
Towne
Donald
second
in the 95-100 range, and milliampere-second averaging between 10 and 12. The vating Schonander table can be raised inches
and
Acoustic
include
microfocus
removal
I. Wilner
angle
the
only
has
findings
mass. increased
vascular
by
displace-
the
neuroma,
our
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 118.32.86.246 on 06/20/16 from IP address 118.32.86.246. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
VOL.
No.
123,
displacing
Magnification
s
the
antopaque
i
but
by
associated
nosis
cerebellar
The in
tric
angle
brain
brain
hooker
masses
such
as
gliomas,
tumors
be
may
middle
fossa
rounded
demonstrates
neuromas masses
The
11-D)
neuroma. the
typical
outline
present having
capsule.
tion
of the which
the vessels
evalua-
the
cirtumor.
surgically a
central
which
contains
often
structures
seen by
becomes such
as the
hemisphere
facial
and
series
seen
views 2
Figure
definitely
show
the
conventional
the aid
il-C;
2,
(Fig.
4,
fine
demonstrated but
and
of magnificaand
3, il-C).
il-C;
and vessels
magnification
difficult
to delineate
methods. stains
are
C
capsular
Towne
capsular
with were
B and within
these
in
with (Fig. cases
,
vascularity
our
best
techniques last
Meningioma
in
increased In
were
were
with
capsule.
which
cerebellar
angiography,
as hypo-
that
and
“stain”
caused
approach
preoperative
surrounding
tissue.
was
proper
the
Most
stem,
arachnoidal
trans
Choosing boundaries
and intrans-
a
portion
to adjacent
brain
combined
a detailed
vessels
and this
and
vessels
adherent
and
necessitates
iil
numerous
operative
approaches.
Figure
is the
The upon tumor size by suboccipital,
cumscribed
capsular
by
shown
techniques depend clude craniotomy
of the
core
It
epidermoids,
microscopic
tion
vascular
eccen-
diagnostic modality. Sophisticated
labyrinthine,
stem diag-
aneurysms,
meningiomas,
stem
metastatic
and
occasional
hemangioblastomas,
33
medi ,. (B) 1 projec ion ( times magni cation) of the arterial phase. vessels (arrow) are noted. The left superior cerebellar artery is pushed medially (C) Venous phase of the same injection series. The tumor capsular vessels The left petrosal vein is displaced laterally (arrow).
Abnormal tumor capsular and upwards (arrowhead). (arrows) are still apparent.
changes.
Angiography
more
homoge-
5,
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 118.32.86.246 on 06/20/16 from IP address 118.32.86.246. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
I. Wilner
Harvey
34
and
Donald
Austin
JANUARY,
1975
v (arrowcerebellar :vesseuroma en tional r (arrowthe right ). No
neous
than
the
stippled
Abnormal these
neuroma.
distinguish Epidermoid
ported itv
tumors
to have and
appearance
abnormal
pathologically
vessels
in 4 of the Lateral was
have
not
capsular do
the also
of
meningeal tumors.
been
re-
anterior
neuromas inferior
of
associated semilunar
this
vessel
cerebellar was
may
elevate artery,
confirmed
of the
with
tumor
petrosal
vein
involvement
of
ganglion. SUMMARY
such Five
Although
presented.
vascular-
show
not
a finding.
sion
the
cases
displacement
the depres-
surgically
cases
of
angiographically
are
Magnification visualization
acoustic techniques
of
the
studied
neuromas presented.
fine
enhance capsular
vessels
the of
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 118.32.86.246 on 06/20/16 from IP address 118.32.86.246. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
VOL.
No.
123,
Magnification
s
Angiography
35
‘ ;...
3
,\,. ,‘‘...
I
-
B
D I1’
5, Case v. (A) Tomogram canalicular acoustic neuroma
these
mal of
tumors.
When
vessels
are
in the anteroposterior is demonstrated.
Wii
taken with Pantopaque. A large partially extraof any impression upon the superior portion of the contrast material is against involvement of the semilunar ganglion. (B) Conventional transfacial view. The left anterior inferior cerebellar artery (arrow) is poorly seen when compared to the right (arrows). No stain is noted. (C) Towne projection ( times magnification) of the early arterial phase, taken immediately following B. The basilar artery (arrowhead) and the 2 posterior inferior cerebellar arteries (arrows) are noted. (D) ‘I’owne projection (, times magnification) of the late arterial phase. The abnormal capsular vessels (arrow) and the circumscribed branches of the left posterior inferior cerebellar artery surrounding the tumor (arrows) are now apparent.
FIG.
shown,
probably
these
The
tery.
abnor2.
I. Wilner,
7.
1949,
pathognomonic
a neuroma.
Harvey
plane lack
M.I).
of
M.,
3.
extra-axial
mas. 4.
1968,
VALVASSORI,
WILNER,
REFERENCES 1. ATKINSON,
W.
J. Anterior
internal
inferior
cerebellar
ar-
material.
Psychiat.,
G., and HANAFEE, W. cerebellar artery: its radioand significance in diagnosis tumors of posterior fossa. Radi-
90,
281-287.
G. E. Diagnosis
Seminars H. I.,
KNIGHTON,
&
WILsoN,
inferior anatomy
ology,
Neurosurg.,
137-151.
IAKAHASHI,
Anterior graphic
Department of Radiology Harper Hospital 3825 Brush Street Detroit, Michigan 48201
Neurol.,
/2,
of acoustic in Roentgenol., 1969, 4, IIENTON, J. L., EYLER, W.
R. S. Tomographic auditory Radiology,
canal 1970,
neuro17
1-177.
R.,
and
evaluation
using positive 95, 95-99.
contrast
of