F1000Research 2015, 4:162 Last updated: 14 AUG 2015

REVIEW

Advanced and Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neuropsychiatric Lupus [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5p5] Previously titled: Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neuropsychiatric Lupus

Nicolae Sarbu1, Núria Bargalló1,2, Ricard Cervera3 1Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036, Spain 2Magnetic Resonance Imaging Core Facility, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia,

08036, Spain 3Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036, Spain

v2

First published: 23 Jun 2015, 4:162 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6522.1)

Open Peer Review

Latest published: 28 Jul 2015, 4:162 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6522.2)

Abstract Neuropsychiatric lupus is a major diagnostic challenge, and a main cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is, by far, the main tool for assessing the brain in this disease. Conventional and advanced MRI techniques are used to help establishing the diagnosis, to rule out alternative diagnoses, and recently, to monitor the evolution of the disease. This review explores the neuroimaging findings in SLE, including the recent advances in new MRI methods.

Referee Status: Invited Referees

1

2

3

report

version 2 published 28 Jul 2015

version 1

This article is included in the Lupus nephritis and neuropsychiatric lupus channel.

published 23 Jun 2015

report

report

report

1 Fabiola Atzeni, Luigi Sacco University Hospital Italy 2 Murray B. Urowitz, University of Toronto Canada, Zahi Touma, University of Toronto Canada 3 Gian Domenico Sebastiani, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini Italy

Discuss this article Comments (0)

F1000Research Page 1 of 13

F1000Research 2015, 4:162 Last updated: 14 AUG 2015

Corresponding author: Ricard Cervera ([email protected]) How to cite this article: Sarbu N, Bargalló N and Cervera R. Advanced and Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neuropsychiatric Lupus [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5p5] F1000Research 2015, 4:162 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6522.2) Copyright: © 2015 Sarbu N et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Grant information: This work has been founded by the Sociedad Española de Radiológia Médica (06_NBA_INVESTIGACION _SERAM_2013). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing interests: No competing interests are disclosed. First published: 23 Jun 2015, 4:162 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6522.1) First indexed: 16 Jul 2015, 4:162 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6522.1)

F1000Research Page 2 of 13

F1000Research 2015, 4:162 Last updated: 14 AUG 2015

  REVISED           Amendments from Version 1 In this revised version, we included the suggestions of the reviewers: • T  he title was modified, emphasizing the description of the conventional and new techniques • T  he recent contribution by Bortoluzzi et al. (2015), regarding the development of a new algorithm in NPSLE, was now quoted • The meaning of DWI was explained • T  otal corticosteroid was substituted by cumulative corticosteroid • We mentioned the potential use of nanoparticles in SLE • W  e mentioned the use of SPECT and PET perfusion apart of MRI perfusion • R  egarding spectroscopy, we added “The demonstration of the uptake of specific metabolites might in the future be closely associated with neuronal injury in NPSLE” • In the Conclusions paragraph, we added “A complex diagnostic algorithm including neurophysiologic studies, laboratory tests and MRI is probably the best clinical approach” See referee reports

Introduction Despite the fact that the outcome of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has improved considerably over the last decades, neuropshychiatric involvement remains a main cause of morbi-mortality1,2, being responsible for up to 19% of deaths in SLE3,4. The real prevalence of neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) remains unknown, with significant heterogeneity between studies, from 14% to 95% depending on the inclusion criteria; an average of 40–50% is probably widely accepted5–8. Reliable methods for diagnosing NPSLE are also unknown, the clinical judgment remaining the cornerstone for differentiation of these patients9,10. Therefore, NPSLE represents a major diagnostic challenge, being essentially a diagnosis of presumption and exclusion, established after having ruled out other possible causes such as trauma, infection, drug effects, epilepsy, migraine, psychiatric disorders, multiple sclerosis, posterior reversible encephalopathy and previous nervous system disorders5,6,11,12. Very recently, an algorithm based on a probability score was validated to determine the relationship between neuropsychiatric involvement and SLE13. On the other hand, reaching the correct diagnosis of NPSLE is critical in terms of therapeutic decisions and outcome. According to 1999 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Case Definitions for NPSLE, 19 neuropsychiatric syndromes are defined, divided into 12 central and 7 peripheral14. The central ones are further divided into neurological (aseptic meningitis, cerebrovascular disease, demyelinating syndrome, headache including migraine and benign intracranial hypertension, movement disorders, myelopathy, epilepsy), and psychiatric (acute confusional states, anxiety disorder, cognitive dysfunction, affective disorder). The peripheral syndromes are acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy (Guillain-Barre syndrome), autonomic disorder, mononeuropathy

(single/multiplex), myasthenia gravis, cranial neuropathy, plexopathy, and polyneuropathy. The most common syndromes which require neuroimaging studies are headache, cerebrovascular disease, epilepsy and cognitive dysfunction8,15, and also represent four out of five globally most prevalent NPSLE syndromes, as demonstrated by an extensive, recent meta-analysis7. NPSLE is also divided into primary, attributed to SLE specific mechanisms, and secondary, consequence of infections, drugs or metabolic errors, although there are no definitive methods to differentiate between them6,10. In spite of outstanding advances and increasing efforts into research, the physiopathology of NPSLE remains still unclear. Neural and vascular injuries related to antibodies and cytokines were incriminated in active NPSLE. The pathological substrate of NPSLE consists of microangiopathic disease (the most frequent neuropathological finding, typically multifocal, due to intimal hyperplasia, erythrocytes extravasation and fibrin thrombi), macroscopic infarcts (partially explained by secondary coagulopathy due to antiphospholipid antibodies or by embolic phenomena due to Libman–Sacks endocarditis), accelerated atherosclerosis (partially due to steroid treatment, vasculitis and microhemorrhages), direct immune mediated alterations, demyelination and microembolisms5,16–19. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for studying the brain in SLE. The role of other imaging modalities such as computer tomography (CT) is essentially to rule out acute complications such as hemorrhage or large infarcts, or to assess differential diagnoses5,20,21. The large spectrum of clinical presentations, laboratory and pathological findings in NPSLE made the neuroradiological findings nonspecific, a wide range of abnormalities being described8,22. The most frequently reported findings with conventional MRI in large series of NPSLE were multiple small whitematter lesions (30–75%) and cortical atrophy (15–20%), although there is a large percentage of patients (25–60%) with normal MRI scan8,11,23,24. Advanced MRI techniques such diffusion-tensor, magnetization-transfer and volumetric studies, which give microstructural and functional information, could provide evidence of subtle brain changes that allow better understanding of the NPSLE mechanisms. Furthermore, the correlation of the neuroradiological, clinical and immunological biomarkers could give insights into the pathophysiology of the disease. The present review aims to describe the neuroimaging findings in conventional and advanced MRI imaging in NPSLE patients, and their importance from a practical point of view.

Conventional MRI neuroimaging findings Around 50% of the NPSLE patients had normal MRI, especially in diffuse syndromes such as headache, mood disorder, and psychiatric disease8. In the other half of the patients, the most common neuroimaging findings can be classified as vascular diseases (small or large vessel disease), and inflammatory-type lesions (Table 1). Vascular disease, although nonspecific and in many forms of manifestation, is the hallmark of NPSLE8. Vascular lesions are illdefined hyperintensities on T2, and moderately hypointense or isointense on T1. Large vessel disease refers to large infarcts, which have medium-to-large size, are roughly wedge-shaped, occur with a vascular territory distribution, and involve both grey and white matter Page 3 of 13

F1000Research 2015, 4:162 Last updated: 14 AUG 2015

(Figure 1a). With diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) it is possible to determine if they are in the acute, subacute or chronic stage, including silent infarcts. Large vessel infarcts are one of the most debilitating complications of NPSLE, and are found in 10–15% of patients and at a mean age of 35–40 years8,23,25,26. When infarcts occur in NPSLE, a tendency to multiplicity was noticed, which is translated into a high recurrence of ischemic events8. Middle cerebral artery territory is mainly involved, as in the general population8. Many authors associated antiphospholipid antibodies with infarcts and reported a stroke recurrence of around 50% when these antibodies were present23,25,27. Stroke was also more commonly observed in the presence of hypertension, cerebrovascular syndrome and seizures5. Small vessel disease is typically represented by lesions smaller than 1 cm, which follow the distribution of the white matter (periventricular, deep, subcortical) (Figure 1b). Recently, the definitions of

neuroimaging findings of small vessel disease have been established and consist in white-matter hyperintensities, recent small subcortical infarcts, lacunes, microbleeds and brain atrophy28. White-matter hyperintensities (WMH) are the most widespread type of small vessel disease seen in SLE patients, and represents the collective term referring to small T2-hyperintensities including the white matter, basal ganglia, cerebellum and brainstem28. They are characterized as hyperintense on T2 and FLAIR sequences, without cavitation, generally small and ill-defined28,29. The differential diagnosis of WMH is very wide, being associated with many conditions including ageing, dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, heart diseases and migraine28. However, many previous reports already proved increased frequency of WMH in SLE and NPSLE22,30–37. WMH had been shown to involve preferentially the frontal and parietal lobes, consistent with an anterior to posterior gradient, similar to other causes of WMH, but different from inflammatory demyelinating etiologies such as multiple

Table 1. Magnetic resonance imaging classification proposed for brain abnormalities in patients with neuropsychiatric lupus. Abnormalities type Inflammatory-like lesions           Location: supratentorial/infratentorial           Contrast-enhancement           Diffusion restriction Large vessel disease           Single/multiple           Acute/subacute/chronic           Vascular territory Small vessel disease28           White matter hyperintensities29                     Location: frontal, parieto-occipital, temporal, basal ganglia, infratentorial                     Degree of involvement: focal lesions, beginning confluence, diffuse involvement                     Lesion burden: 25 (high lesion burden)           Lacunes           Recent small subcortical infarcts           Microbleeds           Brain atrophy (GCA scale)49 Abbreviations: GCA-Global Cortical Atrophy scale.

a

b

Figure 1a–b. Coronal FLAIR images demonstrate both large and small vessel disease. 1a Large hyperintense cortico-subcortical area consistent with a chronic stroke involving the right middle cerebral artery territory. 1b Focal bilateral white matter hyperintensities reflecting small vessel disease. Figure origin: Department of Radiology, Hospital Clinic Barcelona. Page 4 of 13

F1000Research 2015, 4:162 Last updated: 14 AUG 2015

sclerosis8,38. In a quantitative cerebral MRI assessment, Appenzeller et al.35 showed that age, duration of neuropsychiatric manifestations and cumulative corticosteroid dosage were independent predictors for WMH in SLE. In a recent study in patients with newly diagnosed SLE, WMH were found in 8% of the patients39. Nevertheless, these lesions were observed more frequently in NPSLE when compared with SLE without neuropsychiatric manifestations, with average ranges from 40 to 60%8,11,20,35,37,39,40. WMH were associated with cerebrovascular disease, cognitive dysfunction, seizures, antiphospholipid antibodies, low complements (C3, C4, CH50), age, disease duration, and cumulative corticosteroid dose8,35. Previous reports demonstrated a significant association between both NPSLE activity (Neuro-SLEDAI) and injury (Neuro-SLICC) scores with the number of WMH (high lesion burden)11,35,37,39,41. Furthermore, new lesions were noticed during onset of new neuropsychiatric manifestations, and resolution of lesions was found with clinical improvement26,42,43. Quantitative methods are increasingly proposed for the quantification and follow-up of the WMH in NPSLE, as they can function as an independent predictor for the NPSLE activity and injury, holding promise to open a new line of follow-up of NPSLE patients and their response to therapy, similar to the monitoring of multiple sclerosis33,35,39. Recent small subcortical infarcts, commonly known as lacunar infarcts, are infarctions in the territory of perforating arterioles, of less than 20 mm in its maximum diameter in the axial plane, with imaging signs or clinical symptoms consistent with a lesion occurring in the previous few weeks28. Their natural evolution is into lacunes, WMH without cavitation, or they might disappear44. Old lacunar infarcts (lacunes) must be differentiated from perivascular (Virchow-Robin) spaces, which generally are smaller, located mostly around the anterior commissure and usually appear linear when imaged parallel to the course of the vessel. Lacunes were commonly described in elderly, asymptomatic individuals, in the presence of hypertension, and were related to dementia, gait impairment and increased risk of stroke28. Very few studies evaluated lacunes in NPSLE and they were found with a prevalence of 11.5–16%, higher than in the general population8,11. Cerebral microbleeds are small (usually 2–5 mm, but up to 10 mm) round or oval areas of signal void with associated blooming on paramagnetic-sensitive sequences such as T2*weighted gradient recalled echo (GRE) or susceptibility-weighted images (SWI). Microscopically, hemosiderin-laden macrophages in perivascular tissue are seen, indicating vascular leakage of blood cells, related to bleeding-prone microangiopathy. In the general population, microbleeds are usually located in the cortico-subcortical junction, deep grey and white matter, brainstem and cerebellum. They were associated with hypertension, amyloid angiopathy, cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease45,46. In NPSLE, microbleeds were found in 14.5% of the patients on GRE/SWI sequences, and were correlated with lupus anticoagulant (antiphospholipid antibodies) and cerebrovascular syndrome8. Cortical atrophy is seen as generalized enlargement of peripheral cerebrospinal fluid spaces and is best evaluated on volumetric 3D-T1 or FLAIR images. In the general population, age related atrophic changes are small prior to age 50 years, as proved by a large study47 or, similarly, by another underlying that brain volumes in females

remained stable over a span of 15 to 69 years of age48. There are different scales to unify the radiological language, one of the most known being the global cortical atrophy scale (GCA)49. GCA evaluation at the onset of NPSLE observed cortical atrophy in 18.5% of the subjects, most commonly in a mild grade, and at a mean age of 42.5 years8. Brain atrophy occurs more frequently in the presence of other radiological manifestations consistent with small vessel disease, such as WMH, high lesion burden, lacunes and microbleeds8. Brain atrophy was also correlated with lupus anticoagulant, low complement, longer disease duration, cognitive dysfunction and cerebrovascular disease23,37. Many authors suggested that the atrophy might be the result of the prednisone use37,50, while others found no association31,39,51,52, which suggests that additional mechanisms, probably related to NPSLE itself, seem to be involved53–56. Less frequently, some NPSLE patients present inflammatory-type lesions which were described as ill defined, hyperintense on T2 and FLAIR, involving the grey and white matter, generally medium or large-sized, some of them with contrast enhancement or diffusion restriction, without vascular territory distribution nor clinical and radiological features of infarcts, which usually resolves after aggressive corticosteroid treatment. They were reported in 5–10% of patients, and were correlated with low complement levels, indicating an immunological damage related to antibodies and cytokines and supporting the immunological pathogenesis of NPSLE6. Yet rarely present, findings related to cerebral vasculitis were described, when angiography exams (MRI or conventional) could show focal beadings and narrowings of large and small arteries16,57–60. Myelitis, a type of inflammatory involvement of the central nervous system, is one of the most debilitating complications of NPSLE and occurs in 1–5% of SLE patients. It usually develops early in the evolution of the disease and associates a worse outcome. In 39% of the patients with SLE related myelopathy, it constitutes the presenting symptom of SLE, and in another 42% it occurs during the first 5 years after the diagnosis. The most described MRI pattern in SLE myelitis is consistent with transverse myelitis: commonly long affected segment, more than 2–3 vertebral bodies in length and with injury of both halves of the cord (Figure 2). Transverse myelitis associates a variable swelling and focal enlargement. Enhancement is usually absent or poor, patchy in the most active presentations. The outcome of SLE myelitis is variable, ranging from complete recovery to severe disability, but the injury is typically much less extensive on follow up MRI10,61.

Advanced MRI techniques Up to 40–50% of NPSLE patients had no brain abnormalities on conventional MRI8,11,31,33,36,62. Nonetheless, advanced MRI sequences in NPSLE demonstrated underlying abnormalities in normal appearing white and grey matter, which shows the limitations of conventional sequences52,63,64. Recent studies used advanced MRI techniques in the analysis of NPSLE, as the assessment of tissue-specific atrophy by morphometric methods38,52,65, diffusion-tensor imaging52,64,66,67, magnetization transfer imaging52,66,67, magnetic resonance spectroscopy67,68 and perfusion MRI. The use of nanoparticles for molecular MRI is another new technique with potential interest in SLE, although its applications in NPSLE have not yet been studied69.

Page 5 of 13

F1000Research 2015, 4:162 Last updated: 14 AUG 2015

Voxel based morphometry (VBM) is a technique which allows the assessment of the focal differences in brain anatomy and, therefore, the assessment of tissue-specific atrophy. The volume in every voxel is compared across the brain, and VBM is frequently performed for examining differences between populations, although it can also be used to assess asymmetries between brain hemispheres. Morphometric studies showed that decreased whole brain volume with increased lateral ventricle volume and both global gray matter and white matter atrophy are present in SLE patients compared to healthy controls70. Moreover, it was demonstrated that atrophy evolved over a short period of time52,68,71. A number of publications found that selective cortical atrophy was the tissue specific atrophy measure with best correlation with the presence of NPSLE, and suggested that cortical atrophy is more important for mediating brain damage in NPSLE patients than the white matter lesions52,71. From a practical point of view, the macroscopic damage of the cortical gray matter might be more important for identifying NPSLE patients than the micro- or macrostructural damage in the white matter52,71, yet it was reported an association of NPSLE with both cortical and central atrophy52,65,72. Some authors compared cohorts of NPSLE with SLE and controls. The NPSLE group exhibited decreased cortical thickness in left frontal and parietal lobes as well as in right parietal and occipital lobes compared to controls. Both SLE and NPSLE groups exhibited comparable thinning in frontal and temporal lobes73. Automated morphometric methods were also used for segmenting white matter lesions in patients with SLE, which could give a more precise quantification of the focal injuries74.

Figure 2. Sagittal T2-weighted image shows an extensive hyperintensity involving the medulla oblongata and the cervicotoracic cord, compatible with a myelitis pattern. Figure origin: Department of Radiology, Hospital Clinic Barcelona.

a

Diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) is based on the measurement of water diffusion through cellular compartments, and was demonstrated to provide better resolution than conventional sequences regarding white matter microstructure (Figure 3a–b)75,76. Compared to more isotropic movement of water in gray matter, the diffusion

b

Figure 3a–b. Axial maps of fractional anisotropy (FA). 3a Normal FA shows the integrity and directionality of the white matter fibers (red: right-left, green: anterior-posterior, blue: craneo-caudal). 3b Altered (low) FA seen as loss of the normal colors of the left corticospinal tract in the internal capsule and of the left longitudinal fasciculus related to ischemic infarct of the territory of the left middle cerebral artery (arrows) in a patient with neuropsychiatric lupus and stroke. Figure origin: Department of Radiology, Hospital Clinic Barcelona. Page 6 of 13

F1000Research 2015, 4:162 Last updated: 14 AUG 2015

in white matter presents higher anisotropy, with preferential diffusion along the length of the axon. This anisotropy is due to the well-structured axonal membranes and their myelin sheaths. The diffusion can be quantified by the following parameters: apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), radial diffusivity (RD) and axial diffusivity (AD). FA is a measure of myelination and axonal integrity, and MD a measure of molecular motion. High FA and low MD suggest greater myelination and axonal integrity. Previous studies found changes in various DTI indices in SLE and NPSLE patients, in relation to important microscopic injury of the white matter77. In patients with SLE, white matter injury in frontal lobes, corpus callosum, and thalamus has been found68,78–80. FA values were reported to be lower and MD values to be higher in the brain of NPSLE patients than in healthy controls. Increased AD of white matter was also correlated with NPSLE when compared to healthy populations. It was suggested that the underlying pathological substrate of white matter changes in NPSLE may be the selective axonal damage52,66,71. A localized injury of white matter tracts was also demonstrated in the limbic system, internal capsule, corpus callosum, forceps major and corona radiata64,67,79,81,82. Very recent publications underline the role of DTI as an imaging biomarker of NPSLE83.

involvement of SLE85. Lower NAA ratios were also reported in both SLE and NPSLE patients63, and increased myo-inositol, a marker of gliosis, was suggested as a marker of poor prognosis in NPSLE86. The demonstration of the uptake of specific metabolites might in the future be closely associated with neuronal injury in NPSLE.

Magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) is based on the interaction between free water protons and bound protons. The differences in the proton mobility in various macromolecules and tissues are used to generate differences in image signal. Thus, MTI is used to generate contrast, and it has a variety of clinical applications. Volumetric MTI was used to quantify cerebral lesions in different diseases, mainly in multiple sclerosis. Bosma et al.84 compared MTI histogram parameters in 5 groups of patients: active NPSLE, chronic NPSLE, SLE without NPSLE, multiple sclerosis, and normal control subjects. The magnetization transfer ratio histograms in the group of SLE without NPSLE and the group of healthy controls were similar, whereas those in chronic NPSLE and multiple sclerosis groups were flatter. The active NPSLE group showed also a flattening of the histograms, but with a higher magnetization transfer ratio. This suggests that MTI could be able to differentiate active NPSLE. It is also believed that MTI might be a good method for monitoring treatment trials in NPSLE84. A report combining MTI with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) found correlation between brain atrophy and MRS markers of axonal and myelin damage67. Studies combining MTI with DWI, MRS and T2 relaxometry data in NPSLE suggest a common pathogenesis in NPSLE in spite of the many differences in the neuropsychiatric presentation52,66.

Overall, advanced MRI techniques seem to be able to detect microstructural brain damage in a very early stage when not visible on conventional sequences. There could be a temporal dissociation between the detection of damage with these sequences and its translation to significant abnormalities on conventional MRI. Advanced MRI is also expected to help to better understand the underlying pathological substrate of cerebral damage in NPSLE. However, the role of advanced MRI techniques in patients with SLE is yet in its infancy and needs to be further investigated. Future longitudinal studies should determine whether early changes of the white and gray matter in NPSLE patients may involve a higher degree of tissue-specific brain atrophy over time and to what extent it would be possible to monitor disease progression and response to therapy.

MRS allows the analysis of brain metabolites. Different proton groups have different magnetic fields in relation to their valence electrons. As a result, they resonate at different frequencies of the magnetic field, which can be demonstrated by MRS, as peaks that correspond to different metabolites. N-acetylaspartate (NAA) is one of the main markers assessed on MRS and is found in higher concentrations in neurons, thus it is a marker of neuronal viability. Glutamate, a non-essential amino acid, is the most important excitatory neurotransmitter, and prolonged neuron excitation by glutamate can be toxic to neurons. NAA and glutamine-glutamate changes were demonstrated in normal-appearing brain in SLE patients, before neurologic and imaging manifestations became apparent, which suggests that these markers might predict the early cerebral

Perfusion imaging such as done with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET) and MRI could reveal abnormalities in SLE patients. There are three techniques of perfusion MRI, based on the administration of gadolinium (dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced imaging), or without contrast administration (arterial spin labeled imaging). The main parameters derived from them are mean transit time (MTT), time to peak (TTP), cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV). The defined pathological patterns are hypoperfusion (high MTT/TTP, low CBF/ CBV) and hyperperfusion (low TTP/MTT, high CBV/CBF)87. Few prospective studies analyzed brain perfusion in SLE patients. Some authors showed that perfusion in SLE patients was not different from healthy controls88, while others reported a pattern of hypoperfusion in both SLE and NPSLE63, or even hyperperfusion in the posterior cingulate gyrus in patients with active disease89.

Looking at all sides of the argument, it is questionable what patients and when should be referred for brain MRI and what is the role of MRI in the clinical management of NPSLE. Syndromes such as cerebrovascular disease, cognitive dysfunction, seizures and myelopathy, as well as the focal symptomatology, were often related with radiological abnormalities, and require to be comprehensively studied; additional sequences such as DWI, GRE/SWI and contrast-enhanced should be included when MRI is performed in these patients. Conversely, MRI is more likely to be unremarkable in some other syndromes such as headache, psychosis and, generally, diffuse neurological presentations rather than focal ones. Additionally, the status of antiphospholipid antibodies, complement and disease activity plays an important role. Therefore, in the current settings, the decision of when imaging a patient remains probably best reached through a case-based clinical judgment. The other side of the argument of MRI in NPSLE regards ruling out other causes of neuropsychiatric manifestations rather than diagnosing NPSLE. Despite MRI being the imaging modality of choice and despite significant recent advances in this field, there are neither diagnostic nor specific radiological findings for NPSLE, Page 7 of 13

F1000Research 2015, 4:162 Last updated: 14 AUG 2015

meaning that MRI cannot confirm nor exclude the diagnosis of NPSLE. Nevertheless, in the absence of alternative diagnoses when imaging a SLE patient, some patterns may be proposed: stroke in young patients, more than one infarct, association between large and small vessel disease, high lesion burden at young age and premature cortical atrophy. All these in a subject meeting criteria for SLE and without other risk factors, probably could suggest either the presence or a possible development of NPSLE in the following period. In conclusion, MRI is crucial for both supporting the diagnosis of NPSLE and for ruling out alternative diagnoses. A complex diagnostic algorithm including neurophysiologic studies, laboratory tests and MRI is probably the best clinical approach. The multimodal MRI approach including conventional and advanced techniques may be an important tool for monitoring the disease activity, progression and treatment response, and may provide fundamental insights into the pathological substrate. To make this possible, a common radiological terminology is a first requirement.

Author contributions All the authors wrote and edited the manuscript and approved the final version. Competing interests No competing interests are disclosed. Grant information This work has been founded by the Sociedad Española de Radiológia Médica (06_NBA_INVESTIGACION _SERAM_2013). I confirm that the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements To Pilar Toledano, MD, and Gerard Espinosa, MD, PhD, Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, for their collaboration in lupus research projects.

References 1.

Cervera R, Khamashta MA, Font J, et al.: Morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus during a 10-year period: a comparison of early and late manifestations in a cohort of 1,000 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2003; 82(5): 299–308. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

2.

O’Neill S, Cervera R: Systemic lupus erythematosus. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 24(6): 841–855. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

3.

Chiewthanakul P, Sawanyawisuth K, Foocharoen C, et al.: Clinical features and predictive factors in neuropsychiatric lupus. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2012; 30(1): 55–60. PubMed Abstract

4.

Zirkzee EJ, Huizinga TW, Bollen EL, et al.: Mortality in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE). Lupus. 2014; 23(1): 31–38. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

5.

Joseph FG, Scolding NJ: Neurolupus. Pract Neurol. 2010; 10(1): 4–15. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

6.

inflammation in newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2011; 63(10): 3048–3057. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 13.

Bortoluzzi A, Scire C, Bombardieri S, et al.: Development and validation of a new algorithm for attribution of neuropsychiatric events in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015; 54(5): 891–898. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

14.

ACR Ad Hoc Committee on Neuropsychiatric Lupus Nomenclature. The American College of Rheumatology nomenclature and case definitions for neuropsychiatric lupus syndromes. Arthritis Rheum. 1999; 42(4): 599–608. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

15.

Netto TM, Zimmermann N, Rueda-Lopes F, et al.: Neuropsychiatric lupus: classification criteria in neuroimaging studies. Can J Neurol Sci. 2013; 40(3): 284–291. PubMed Abstract

16.

Bertsias GK, Boumpas DT: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of neuropsychiatric SLE manifestations. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010; 6(6): 358–367. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Ellis SG, Verity MA: Central nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: a review of neuropathologic findings in 57 cases, 1955--1977. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1979; 8(3): 212–221. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

17.

7.

Unterman A, Nolte JE, Boaz M, et al.: Neuropsychiatric syndromes in systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011; 41(1): 1–11. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Sibbitt WL Jr, Brooks WM, Kornfeld M, et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging and brain histopathology In neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2010; 40(1): 32–52. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

18.

8.

Sarbu N, Alobeidi F, Toledano P, et al.: Brain abnormalities in newly diagnosed neuropsychiatric lupus: systematic MRI approach and correlation with clinical and laboratory data in a large multicenter cohort. Autoimmun Rev. 2015; 14(2): 153–159. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Sarbu MI, Salman-Monte TC, Rubio Muñoz P, et al.: Differences between clinical and laboratory findings in patients with recent diagnosis of SLE according to the positivity of anti-dsDNA by the Crithidia luciliae method. Lupus. 2015; pii: 0961203315573852. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

19.

9.

Cervera R, Abarca-Costalago M, Abramovicz D, et al.: Systemic lupus erythematosus in Europe at the change of the millennium: lessons from the “Euro-Lupus Project”. Autoimmun Rev. 2006; 5(3): 180–186. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Fanouriakis A, Boumpas DT, Bertsias GK: Pathogenesis and treatment of CNS lupus. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2013; 25(5): 577–583. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

20.

Bertsias GK, Ioannidis JP, Aringer M, et al.: EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus with neuropsychiatric manifestations: report of a task force of the EULAR standing committee for clinical affairs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010; 69(12): 2074–2082. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Sibbitt WL Jr, Sibbitt RR, Griffey RH, et al.: Magnetic resonance and computed tomographic imaging in the evaluation of acute neuropsychiatric disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989; 48(12): 1014–1022. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

21.

Zardi EM, Taccone A, Marigliano B, et al.: Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus: tools for the diagnosis. Autoimmun Rev. 2014; 13(8): 831–839. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

22.

Castellino G, Govoni M, Giacuzzo S, et al.: Optimizing clinical monitoring of central nervous system involvement in SLE. Autoimmun Rev. 2008; 7(4): 297–304. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

23.

Csépány T, Bereczki D, Kollár J, et al.: MRI findings in central nervous system systemic lupus erythematosus are associated with immunoserological

10.

11.

Luyendijk J, Steens SC, Ouwendijk WJ, et al.: Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus: lessons learned from magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum. 2011; 63(3): 722–732. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

12.

Ramage AE, Fox PT, Brey RL, et al.: Neuroimaging evidence of white matter

Page 8 of 13

F1000Research 2015, 4:162 Last updated: 14 AUG 2015

parameters and hypertension. J Neurol. 2003; 250(11): 1348–1354. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 24.

Toledano P, Sarbu N, Espinosa G, et al.: Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus: Magnetic resonance imaging findings and correlation with clinical and immunological features. Autoimmun Rev. 2013; 12(12): 1166–1170. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

44.

Doubal FN, Dennis MS, Wardlaw JM: Characteristics of patients with minor ischaemic strokes and negative MRI: a cross-sectional study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011; 82(5): 540–542. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

45.

Cordonnier C, Al-Shahi Salman R, Wardlaw J: Spontaneous brain microbleeds: systematic review, subgroup analyses and standards for study design and reporting. Brain. 2007; 130(Pt 8): 1988–2003. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

25.

Joseph FG, Lammie GA, Scolding NJ: CNS lupus: a study of 41 patients. Neurology. 2007; 69(7): 644–654. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

46.

26.

Sibbitt WL Jr, Sibbitt RR, Brooks WM: Neuroimaging in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1999; 42(10): 2026–2038. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Greenberg SM, Vernooij MW, Cordonnier C, et al.: Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation. Lancet Neurol. 2009; 8(2): 165–174. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

47.

27.

Mikdashi J, Handwerger B: Predictors of neuropsychiatric damage in systemic lupus erythematosus: data from the Maryland lupus cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004; 43(12): 1555–1560. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

DeCarli C, Massaro J, Harvey D, et al.: Measures of brain morphology and infarction in the framingham heart study: establishing what is normal. Neurobiol Aging. 2005; 26(4): 491–510. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

48.

28.

Wardlaw JM, Smith EE, Biessels GJ, et al.: Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol. 2013; 12(8): 822–838. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

Carne RP, Vogrin S, Litewka L, et al.: Cerebral cortex: an MRI-based study of volume and variance with age and sex. J Clin Neurosci. 2006; 13(1): 60–72. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

49.

Scheltens P, Pasquier F, Weerts JG, et al.: Qualitative assessment of cerebral atrophy on MRI: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility in dementia and normal aging. Eur Neurol. 1997; 37(2): 95–99. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

29.

Wahlund LO, Barkhof F, Fazekas F, et al.: A new rating scale for age-related white matter changes applicable to MRI and CT. Stroke. 2001; 32(6): 1318–1322. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

50.

30.

Rovaris M, Inglese M, Viti B, et al.: The contribution of fast-FLAIR MRI for lesion detection in the brain of patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. J Neurol. 2000; 247(1): 29–33. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Zanardi VA, Magna LA, Costallat LT: Cerebral atrophy related to corticotherapy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Clin Rheumatol. 2001; 20(4): 245–250. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

51.

Sanna G, Piga M, Terryberry JW, et al.: Central nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: cerebral imaging and serological profile in patients with and without overt neuropsychiatric manifestations. Lupus. 2000; 9(8): 573–583. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Chinn RJ, Wilkinson ID, Hall-Craggs MA, et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and cerebral proton spectroscopy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997; 40(1): 36–46. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

52.

Zivadinov R, Shucard JL, Hussein S, et al.: Multimodal imaging in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with diffuse neuropsychiatric involvement. Lupus. 2013; 22(7): 675–683. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

53.

Lauvsnes MB, Omdal R: Systemic lupus erythematosus, the brain, and anti-NR2 antibodies. J Neurol. 2012; 259(4): 622–629. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

54.

Marcinko K, Parsons T, Lerch JP, et al.: Effects of prolonged treatment with memantine in the MRL model of CNS lupus. Clin Exp Neuroimmunol. 2012; 3(3): 116–128. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

55.

Muscal E, Traipe E, de Guzman MM, et al.: Cerebral and cerebellar volume loss in children and adolescents with systemic lupus erythematosus: a review of clinically acquired brain magnetic resonance imaging. J Rheumatol. 2010; 37(8): 1768–1775. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

56.

Sled JG, Spring S, van Eede M, et al.: Time course and nature of brain atrophy in the MRL mouse model of central nervous system lupus. Arthritis Rheum. 2009; 60(6): 1764–1774. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

57.

Böckle BC, Jara D, Aichhorn K, et al.: Cerebral large vessel vasculitis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2014; 23(13): 1417–1421. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

58.

Kato R, Sumitomo S, Kawahata K, et al.: Successful treatment of cerebral large vessel vasculitis in systemic lupus erythematosus with intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide. Lupus. 2015; pii: 0961203315570163. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

31.

32.

Jennings JE, Sundgren PC, Attwood J, et al.: Value of MRI of the brain in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and neurologic disturbance. Neuroradiology. 2004; 46(1): 15–21. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

33.

Appenzeller S, Pike GB, Clarke AE: Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of central nervous system manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2008; 34(3): 361–366. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

34.

Katsumata Y, Harigai M, Kawaguchi Y, et al.: Diagnostic reliability of magnetic resonance imaging for central nervous system syndromes in systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010; 11: 13. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

35.

Appenzeller S, Vasconcelos Faria A, Li LM, et al.: Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analyses and clinical significance of hyperintense white matter lesions in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Ann Neurol. 2008; 64(6): 635–643. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

36.

Castellino G, Padovan M, Bortoluzzi A, et al.: Single photon emission computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation in SLE patients with and without neuropsychiatric involvement. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008; 47(3): 319–323. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

37.

Ainiala H, Dastidar P, Loukkola J, et al.: Cerebral MRI abnormalities and their association with neuropsychiatric manifestations in SLE: a population-based study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2005; 34(5): 376–382. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

59.

Abda EA, Selim ZI, Radwan ME, et al.: Markers of acute neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus: a multidisciplinary evaluation. Rheumatol Int. 2013; 33(5): 1243–1253. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

38.

Benedict RH, Shucard JL, Zivadinov R, et al.: Neuropsychological impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison with multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychol Rev. 2008; 18(2): 149–166. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

60.

Kizu H, Dobashi H, Kameda T, et al.: Improvement of irregularity of brain vessel walls in systemic lupus erythematosus by tacrolimus. Clin Rheumatol. 2011; 30(5): 715–718. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

39.

Petri M, Naqibuddin M, Carson KA, et al.: Brain magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2008; 35(12): 2348–54. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

61.

40.

Sibbitt WL Jr, Schmidt PJ, Hart BL, et al.: Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) imaging in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2003; 30(9): 1983–1989. PubMed Abstract

Espinosa G, Mendizábal A, Mínguez S, et al.: Transverse myelitis affecting more than 4 spinal segments associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical, immunological, and radiological characteristics of 22 patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2010; 39(4): 246–256. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

62.

Steup-Beekman GM, Zirkzee EJ, Cohen D, et al.: Neuropsychiatric manifestations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: epidemiology and radiology pointing to an immune-mediated cause. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 72(Suppl 2): ii76–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

63.

Zimny A, Szmyrka-Kaczmarek M, Szewczyk P, et al.: In vivo evaluation of brain damage in the course of systemic lupus erythematosus using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, perfusion-weighted and diffusion-tensor imaging. Lupus. 2014; 23(1): 10–19. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

64.

Hughes M, Sundgren PC, Fan X, et al.: Diffusion tensor imaging in patients with acute onset of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective study of apparent diffusion coefficient, fractional anisotropy values, and eigenvalues in different regions of the brain. Acta Radiol. 2007; 48(2): 213–222. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

41.

Podrazilová L, Peterová V, Olejárová M, et al.: Magnetic resonance volumetry of pathological brain foci in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008; 26(4): 604–610. PubMed Abstract

42.

West SG, Emlen W, Wener MH, et al.: Neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus: a 10-year prospective study on the value of diagnostic tests. Am J Med. 1995; 99(2): 153–163. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

43.

Karassa FB, Ioannidis JP, Boki KA, et al.: Predictors of clinical outcome and radiologic progression in patients with neuropsychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Med. 2000; 109(8): 628–634. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Page 9 of 13

F1000Research 2015, 4:162 Last updated: 14 AUG 2015

65.

Appenzeller S, Bonilha L, Rio PA, et al.: Longitudinal analysis of gray and white matter loss in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Neuroimage. 2007; 34(2): 694–701. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

66.

Bosma GP, Steens SC, Petropoulos H, et al.: Multisequence magnetic resonance imaging study of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 50(10): 3195–3202. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

67.

Emmer BJ, Steup-Beekman GM, Steens SC, et al.: Correlation of magnetization transfer ratio histogram parameters with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus criteria and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: association of magnetization transfer ratio peak height with neuronal and cognitive dysfunction. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 58(5): 1451–1457. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

68.

Filley CM, Kozora E, Brown MS, et al.: White matter microstructure and cognition in non-neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2009; 22(1): 38–44. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

69.

Serkova N, Renner B, Larsen B, et al.: Renal inflammation: targeted iron oxide nanoparticles for molecular MR imaging in mice. Radiology. 2010; 255(2): 517–526. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

70.

Xu J, Cheng Y, Chai P, et al.: White-matter volume reduction and the protective effect of immunosuppressive therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with normal appearance by conventional magnetic resonance imaging. J Rheumatol. 2010; 37(5): 974–986. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

77.

Schmidt-Wilcke T, Cagnoli P, Wang P, et al.: Diminished white matter integrity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Neuroimage Clin. 2014; 5: 291–297. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

78.

Kozora E, Filley CM: Cognitive dysfunction and white matter abnormalities in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011: 1–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

79.

Zhang L, Harrison M, Heier LA, et al.: Diffusion changes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 25(3): 399–405. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

80.

Lee SP, Wu CS, Hsieh LC, et al.: Efficacy of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging and three-dimensional fiber tractography in the detection of clinical manifestations of central nervous system lupus. Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 32(5): 598–603. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

81.

Jung RE, Caprihan A, Chavez RS, et al.: Diffusion tensor imaging in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. BMC Neurol. 2010; 10: 65. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

82.

Emmer BJ, Veer IM, Steup-Beekman GM, et al.: Tract-based spatial statistics on diffusion tensor imaging in systemic lupus erythematosus reveals localized involvement of white matter tracts. Arthritis Rheum. 2010; 62(12): 3716–3721. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

83.

Jones JT, DiFrancesco M, Zaal AI, et al.: Childhood-onset lupus with clinical neurocognitive dysfunction shows lower streamline density and pairwise connectivity on diffusion tensor imaging. Lupus. 2015; pii: 0961203315572718. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

84.

Bosma GP, Rood MJ, Huizinga TW, et al.: Detection of cerebral involvement in patients with active neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus by the use of volumetric magnetization transfer imaging. Arthritis Rheum. 2000; 43(11): 2428–2436. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

85.

Cagnoli P, Harris RE, Frechtling D, et al.: Reduced Insular Glutamine and Nacetylaspartate in systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-voxel (1)H-MR spectroscopy study. Acad Radiol. 2013; 20(10): 1286–1296. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

71.

Zivadinov R, Havrdová E, Bergsland N, et al.: Thalamic atrophy is associated with development of clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Radiology. 2013; 268(3): 831–841. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

72.

Appenzeller S, Carnevalle AD, Li LM, et al.: Hippocampal atrophy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006; 65(12): 1585–1589. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

73.

Jung RE, Segall JM, Grazioplene RG, et al.: Cortical thickness and subcortical gray matter reductions in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS One. 2010; 5(3): e9302. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

86.

74.

Scully M, Anderson B, Lane T, et al.: An Automated Method for Segmenting White Matter Lesions through Multi-Level Morphometric Feature Classification with Application to Lupus. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010; 4: 27. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

Guillen-Del Castillo A, Alonso J, Martínez-Valle F, et al.: Increased myo-inositol in parietal white and gray matter as a biomarker of poor prognosis in neuropsychiatric lupus: a case report. Lupus. 2014; 23(10): 1073–1078. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

87.

75.

Pierpaoli C, Jezzard P, Basser PJ, et al.: Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology. 1996; 201(3): 637–648. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Sarbu N, López-Rueda A, Chirife O, et al.: CT-perfusion time-maps likely disclose the earliest imaging signs of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). J Neuroradiol. 2014; 41(2): 147–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

88.

76.

Le Bihan D: Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003; 4(6): 469–480. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Emmer BJ, van Osch MJ, Wu O, et al.: Perfusion MRI in neuro-psychiatric systemic lupus erthemathosus. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010; 32(2): 283–288. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

89.

Wang PI, Cagnoli PC, McCune WJ, et al.: Perfusion-weighted MR imaging in cerebral lupus erythematosus. Acad Radiol. 2012; 19(8): 965–970. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

Page 10 of 13

F1000Research 2015, 4:162 Last updated: 14 AUG 2015

Open Peer Review Current Referee Status: Version 2 Referee Report 30 July 2015

doi:10.5256/f1000research.7385.r9693 Gian Domenico Sebastiani Unità Operativa Complessa Reumatología, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy Authors have made the suggested modifications and the paper is now suitable for indexation. I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Referee Report 29 July 2015

doi:10.5256/f1000research.7385.r9696 Murray B. Urowitz Lupus Clinic, Centre for Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic Diseases, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Version 1 Referee Report 17 July 2015

doi:10.5256/f1000research.7001.r9164 Gian Domenico Sebastiani Unità Operativa Complessa Reumatología, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy

This review is well written and give us a comprehensive updating on magnetic resonance imaging in F1000Research Page 11 of 13

F1000Research 2015, 4:162 Last updated: 14 AUG 2015

This review is well written and give us a comprehensive updating on magnetic resonance imaging in NPSLE. Only few minor suggestions: 1. Introduction - Authors say that "reliable methods for diagnosing NPSLE are also unknown...". This is essentially true, but they could quote the recent contribution by Bortoluzzi et al. (2015), dealing with the development of a new algorithm for attribution of NP events in SLE. 2. Conventional MRI, page 2 - "DWI sequences". Please specify the meaning of DWI. 3. Conventional MRI, page 3 - "total corticosteroid". Cumulative is better. I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Referee Report 16 July 2015

doi:10.5256/f1000research.7001.r9530 Murray B. Urowitz, Zahi Touma Lupus Clinic, Centre for Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic Diseases, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada Sarbu et al. review the utility of MRI imaging in neuropsychiatric lupus (NPL) both what is available today in routine care and for research purposes and what might become useful in clinical care in the future. In NPL clinicians are interested in three major questions. First, is there evidence of NPL at any time in the past; secondly, is there evidence of active NPL currently; and thirdly can you demonstrate change over time with or without treatment in NPL. In terms of the first question Sarbu et al. review the conventional MRI findings in the cortical, subcortical and spinal cord regions. However the nature of the morphologic changes is non specific and many could be compatible with hypertension, amyloid, Alzheimers etc. and thus may not be helpful to the clinician. Even the advanced techniques (not universally available) measuring brain volume and composition are not specific for SLE. In terms of the second question Sarbu et al. review Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) which allows the analysis of brain metabolites. The demonstration of the uptake of specific metabolites might in the future be associated with neuron excitation but no studies are available in NPL. Perfusion imaging such as also done with SPECT and PET scanning can reveal areas of hyper or hypoperfusion but thus far no studies demonstrating active NPL which could change over time exists. In conclusion, this article is a good review of what currently exists and what may be developed over time with MRI imaging. The authors conclude that further clinical association studies with conventional and advanced techniques are required before MRI imaging will become the standard to understand the mechanism, diagnosis and monitoring of NPL.

We have read this submission. We believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to F1000Research Page 12 of 13

F1000Research 2015, 4:162 Last updated: 14 AUG 2015

We have read this submission. We believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Referee Report 07 July 2015

doi:10.5256/f1000research.7001.r9358 Fabiola Atzeni Rheumatology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy Title and Abstract: The title is quite generic and perhaps the description of old and new techniques should be emphasized. Article content: Design, methods and analysis are well explained and appropriate, however the use of nanoparticles (e.g. SPIONS) should be mentioned among the new MRI techniques. Conclusions: The conclusions underline the need for MRI imaging in symptomatic neuropsychiatric SLE, although a standardized consensus still lacks. It should be more evidenced, however, the utility of a complex diagnostic algorithm, including neurophysiologic study of the brain or lab tests, beyond the solely use of MRI. Data: Methods and indications to a specific procedure are well described ; MRI findings are reported according to pathologic or clinical pictures.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

F1000Research Page 13 of 13