Laparoscopic Removal of an Intramyometrial Fetus After Uterine Curettage Pablo Tobıas Gonzalez, MD*, Alejandra Mateos Guillem, MD, Ignacio Zapardiel, PhD, Marıa Dolores Diestro, PhD, and Javier De Santiago, PhD From the Department of Gynecological Oncology, ‘‘Hospital Universitario la Paz’’, Madrid, Spain (all authors).
ABSTRACT Study Objective: To show the removal of an intramyometrial fetus after uterine curettage using laparoscopy as a safe surgical technique that offers excellent results and fewer complications than laparotomy. Design: Presentation of the clinical case and step-by-step explanation of the technique. Settings: Uterine curettage is a frequently performed gynecologic abortion procedure. Dilatation and curettage is considered to be a safe surgical technique, with a low percentage of complications. The most common is uterine perforation, with higher risks in advanced gestational age, retroflexed uterus, or uterine leiomyomas. Interventions: After institutional review board approval, we present the case of a 29-year-old women referred to our hospital from another clinic with a suspected uterine perforation after an elective curettage for a 14-week pregnancy. She presented with moderate abdominal pain. Vaginal ultrasound revealed intramyometrial fetal parts on isthmus and right parametrium and minimal free fluid in the pouch of Douglas. A laparoscopic approach was chosen. After a complete revision of the abdominal cavity, the right paravesical space was dissected, confirming no right uterine artery or ureter injury. One cavity was objectified in the posterior leaf of the broad ligament related to a uterine perforation and containing fetal bone parts, which were removed. The myometrial defect and the peritoneum were closed with intracorporeal sutures. The removal of fetal parts was done with a surgical glove thimble. After the procedure, the patient was treated with clindamycin and gentamycin, with a satisfactory recovery. Conclusion: The presence of an intramyometrial fetus is not a common complication of curettage. The use of laparoscopy is feasible and offers excellent results and advantages versus laparotomy regarding its treatment. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2015) 22, 717 Ó 2015 AAGL. All rights reserved. DISCUSS
Use your Smartphone to scan this QR code and connect to the discussion forum for this article now*
You can discuss this article with its authors and with other AAGL members at http://www.AAGL.org/jmig-22-5-JMIG-D-15-00108
* Download a free QR Code scanner by searching for ‘‘QR scanner’’ in your smartphone’s app store or app marketplace.
Supplementary Data Supplementary data related to this article can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.014
Corresponding author: Pablo Tobıas Gonzalez, MD, ‘‘Hospital Universitario la Paz’’, Madrid, Paseo de la Castellana 261, CP 28043. E-mail: [email protected] 1553-4650/$ - see front matter Ó 2015 AAGL. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.014
Submitted February 17, 2015. Accepted for publication March 20, 2015. Available at www.sciencedirect.com and www.jmig.org
ABSTRACT Study Objective: To show the removal of an intramyometrial fetus after uterine curettage using laparoscopy as a safe surgical technique that offers excellent results and fewer complications than laparotomy. Design: Presentation of the clinical case and step-by-step explanation of the technique. Settings: Uterine curettage is a frequently performed gynecologic abortion procedure. Dilatation and curettage is considered to be a safe surgical technique, with a low percentage of complications. The most common is uterine perforation, with higher risks in advanced gestational age, retroflexed uterus, or uterine leiomyomas. Interventions: After institutional review board approval, we present the case of a 29-year-old women referred to our hospital from another clinic with a suspected uterine perforation after an elective curettage for a 14-week pregnancy. She presented with moderate abdominal pain. Vaginal ultrasound revealed intramyometrial fetal parts on isthmus and right parametrium and minimal free fluid in the pouch of Douglas. A laparoscopic approach was chosen. After a complete revision of the abdominal cavity, the right paravesical space was dissected, confirming no right uterine artery or ureter injury. One cavity was objectified in the posterior leaf of the broad ligament related to a uterine perforation and containing fetal bone parts, which were removed. The myometrial defect and the peritoneum were closed with intracorporeal sutures. The removal of fetal parts was done with a surgical glove thimble. After the procedure, the patient was treated with clindamycin and gentamycin, with a satisfactory recovery. Conclusion: The presence of an intramyometrial fetus is not a common complication of curettage. The use of laparoscopy is feasible and offers excellent results and advantages versus laparotomy regarding its treatment. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2015) 22, 717 Ó 2015 AAGL. All rights reserved. DISCUSS
Use your Smartphone to scan this QR code and connect to the discussion forum for this article now*
You can discuss this article with its authors and with other AAGL members at http://www.AAGL.org/jmig-22-5-JMIG-D-15-00108
* Download a free QR Code scanner by searching for ‘‘QR scanner’’ in your smartphone’s app store or app marketplace.
Supplementary Data Supplementary data related to this article can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.014
Corresponding author: Pablo Tobıas Gonzalez, MD, ‘‘Hospital Universitario la Paz’’, Madrid, Paseo de la Castellana 261, CP 28043. E-mail: [email protected] 1553-4650/$ - see front matter Ó 2015 AAGL. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.014
Submitted February 17, 2015. Accepted for publication March 20, 2015. Available at www.sciencedirect.com and www.jmig.org
