4th.?Which is the its

performance 5 th.?Which

easily managed

more

after

? the

larger proportion

of

Which is less prone to be followed complications ?

by

gives

recoveries ? 6th.

?

regards the first point the purpose of the two procedures is of course similar, namely, to relieve dyspnoea caused by occlusion of the ls?.? As

larynx.

Tracheotomy aims by establishing an

fulfilling this opening

at

artificial

purpose fo r entrance and exit of air behind the stricture as in perineal section, and, if possible, beyond the disease. INTUBATION The

vs.

TRACHEOTOMY.

of

Intubation, which was introduced some years ago by Dr. Joseph O'Dwyer, of New York, has now been subjected to trial on a sufficiently extensive scale to permit of a judgment being formed regarding its merits as compared with the operation of tracheotomy. This has recently been ably and impartially atoperation

tempted by

paper read Association at the

Dr. George W. Gay in

before the American

Surgical

a

Congress of American Phvsicians and Surgeons Dr. held at Washington in September last. JO

o

Gay limits his observations

to the treatment of

croup or membranous laryngitis. Intubation has also been employed in other conditions of the

larynx causing dyspnoea, but it is in diphtheria larynx that it has been most largely employed. Plere the conditions are sufficiently

of the

and the induction

simple afford

a

basis of

comparison.

arise with

naturally

methods of relieving 1 st.?Are

operation objects to

a

sufficiently large The

reference

dyspnoea

questions to

in croup

they really comparable

substitute for the other ? be

these

gained identical,

i?>

that two

are :?

;

is

one

Are the

and the circum-

calling for them similar, or, on the other hand, do they stand on a different footing as regards the purpose and conditions demanding

stances

them ?

2nd.?Which of the

catheter is

a

in.

two is the easier of per-

formance ? most

complete

and

The in

same

to restore

passed

into the bladder and tied

operations principle, and as two

are

thus

quite the points out,

not

Dr. Gay

they rather, as in the analogous urethral procedures, snpplemeut than supplant each other. An exact comparison as between, say, the flap and circular methods of amputation is not possible. They are not even rivals, for should intubation fail to relieve the symptoms, tracheotomy is still available. a

In

most

choice lies between them, in

cheotomy

is

tracheotomy

to

be

can

cases

probably

some cases

tra-

preferred ab initio, and, in all, be held in reserve in case of

need. 2nd.? As

regards comparative facility

formance the truth

is,

that

"

of per-

both

operations are occasionally require special ap-

often attended with difficulties and

danger." They both pliances, but the appliances with

bation

necessary for intuthan for tracheotomy.

special require practice,but intubation being out of sight and depending more on touch than sight, special practice on the dead and living is more needed than in tracheotomy. They both require skilled assistance, but the experiare more

They

both

ence

of intubation indicates that the

the "

3rd.?Which gives the permanent relief?

Intubation endeavours

the patency of the air tube by introducing and retaining a tube, just as, in retention of urine,

"

operation depends

more

on

success

of

the skill and

handinesa" of the assistants than the other. Tracheotomy can be done with the aid of one

good assistant, intubation requires, at least, two." The tracheotomy instruments must always be at hand, in case of failure to introduce the tube

THE INDIAN MEDICAL GAZETTE.

116

that the removal of

obvious much

be

easily

more

It

membrane.

thereof with

blocking

ol*

membrane

is can

in tracheo-

accomplished

tomy than in intubation. relief

3rd.?As

regards especially seem early, performed

operations when

more

of

dyspnoea,

cases, and

in mild to

the

be about,

equal.

Intubation possesses the great merit that it is a bloodless procedure, and therefore more likely to be consented to

earlier

by parents

and others

at

an

tion appear to be more favourable in the case of very young children than of tracheotomy. 6th.?The complications which generally prove fatal in these

get loaded and the lungs congested and the strength spent ; and inter-

source

ference is too late and

to

apt

discredited. there is

to

the

In very young children natural hesitation to cnt

a

which does not

cutting

operation

so

becomes

especially or permit

oppose inpermanency of relief

strongly

extension of disease

are

ensue

after

on

cutting is

operation

The effect very material risk. the voice in cases that recover does not appear be a serious matter in either operation. not a

On the whole, Dr. Gay shows that the operation of intubation has established itself in

practice

as a

means

of

relieving suffering

doubt,"

it relieves

that it

choose between the two

is

procedures.

4th.?The after treatment in both mands skill

have

de-

tracheotomy tube perhaps changed. intubation tube may get gummed up and to be removed, cleaned and replaced, or it

requires The

cases

to

and

be

The

care.

kept

clean and

may be coughed up or even swallowed. On this point Dr. GrAY observes :?" In situated at such

cases

distances,

under cir-

or

cumstances, in which only ordinary and not skilled assistance can be obtained in an emergency, tracheotomy is the safer method." In other words, if the services of a skilled phy-

sician as

in

a

cannot be obtained at

hospital, tracheotomy

intubation. the

Any

contingencies

doctor

or

a

moment's

is to be

notice, preferred to

cope with but it requires

nurse can

of

tracheotomy, replace an intubaspecial is tube. tion Feeding evidently less easily managintubation than after tracheotomy. ed after 5th.?Dr. Gay has gone very carefully into skill

to remove and

the question of the proportion of recoveries which take place after both operations. The

experience

is

larger

in the

case

of

tracheotomy,

but careful consideration of available statistics " leads him to the conclusion that the mortality

he states,

of intubation have

record,

and the results

now

are

The immediate relief to the

for all with

is

more

easily

Hundreds of

been put upon

fairly satisfactory.

dyspnoea

may not,

complete, as it is after it is usually sufficient operation, yet

severe cases

the old

that

life ; that it to do; and that,

dyspnoea; reasonably safe operation in the majority of instances, it performed than tracheotomy. cases

"

and

saves

a

in the severe

the other.

is,

With respect to depends on the extent and progress of the disease, and there does not seem to be much to

tubation.

as

of course, a special risk of operation, but danger from this

Wound infection the

one

having life in croup. " There can be no

that

to

lungs, pulmonary congestion and pneumonia, blood-poisoning, asthenia, syncope ; and the evidence goes to show that these results are as

tubes

are

cases

the

liable to

than the

disease

namely,

in round numbers 75 per cent, of deaths and 25 per cent, of recoveries. The results of intuba-

stage cutting operation. This is a very great point in its favour ; for if operative relief is delayed, the

of the

each is about the same,"

attending

1889

[April,

practical opposition,

be

as

Intubation has met purposes. but in spite of its dangers and

inconveniences, from which no method of treating these affections is free, its advantages are gradually forcing themselves upon the profession, as experience becomes more extensive."

Intubation vs. Tracheotomy.

Intubation vs. Tracheotomy. - PDF Download Free
3MB Sizes 1 Downloads 7 Views