Accepted Manuscript Intraregional Classification of Wine via ICP-MS elemental Fingerprinting P.P. Coetzee, F.P. van Jaarsveld, F. Vanhaecke PII: DOI: Reference:

S0308-8146(14)00731-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.05.027 FOCH 15808

To appear in:

Food Chemistry

Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date:

24 January 2014 25 April 2014 10 May 2014

Please cite this article as: Coetzee, P.P., van Jaarsveld, F.P., Vanhaecke, F., Intraregional Classification of Wine via ICP-MS elemental Fingerprinting, Food Chemistry (2014), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.05.027

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1

Intraregional Classification of Wine via ICP-MS elemental

2

Fingerprinting.

3 P.P. Coetzeea,*, F.P. van Jaarsveld,b F. Vanhaeckec

4 5 6 7 8 9 10

a

Department of Chemistry, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, Box 524, Johannesburg 2006, South

Africa. E-mail: [email protected] b

ARC

Infruitec-Nietvoorbij,

Private

Bag

X5026,

Stellenbosch

7599,

South

Africa.

E-mail:

[email protected] c

Department of Analytical Chemistry, Krijgslaan 281-S12, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. E-mail:

[email protected]

11 12

*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +27(0)11 5592558; Fax: +27 (0)11 5592819

13 14

Abstract

15

The feasibility of elemental fingerprinting in the classification of wines according to their

16

provenance vineyard soil was investigated in the relatively small geographical area of a

17

single wine district. Results for the Stellenbosch wine district (Western Cape Wine Region,

18

South Africa), comprising an area of less than 1000 km2, suggest that classification of wines

19

from different estates (120 wines from 23 estates) is indeed possible using accurate elemental

20

data and multivariate statistical analysis based on a combination of principal component

21

analysis, cluster analysis, and discriminant analysis. This is the first study to demonstrate the

22

successful classification of wines at estate level in a single wine district in South Africa. The

23

elements B, Ba, Cs, Cu, Mg, Rb, Sr, Tl, and Zn were identified as suitable indicators. White

24

and red wines were grouped in separate data sets to allow successful classification of wines.

25

Correlation between wine classification and soil type distributions in the area was observed.

26 27

Keywords: ICP-MS; multi-element analysis of wine; wine provenance; multivariate

28

statistical analysis 1

29

Abbreviated running title: Intraregional Wine Fingerprinting.

30 31

1. Introduction

32 33

In recent years, much progress has been made in food authentication through fingerprinting

34

techniques (Kelly et al, 2005), in particular in terms of provenance determination. The

35

method combines chemical analysis, by any of a variety of instrumental analytical techniques

36

(primarily trace element and isotope ratio analysis), and multivariate statistical analysis

37

(Tzouros & Arvanitoyannis, 2001; Serapinas et al., 2008) of the chemical data, to obtain

38

identification and classification of an agricultural product according to geographical origin.

39

The method assumes that the chemical composition of an agricultural product, such as wine,

40

will reflect the composition of the provenance soil. In the case of wine, studies of this nature

41

are being pursued in most wine-producing countries (Martin et al., 1999; Taylor et al., 2003;

42

Gremaud et al., 2004; Thiel et al., 2004; Angus et al., 2006; Tarantilis et al., 2008; Galgano

43

et al., 2008; Gonzálvez et al., 2009; Laurie et al.; 2010; Fabani et al., 2010; Fabrina et al.,

44

2011; Di Paola-Naranjo et al., 2011). These studies focus on distinguishing wines from

45

different countries and some also attempt to classify wines from different regions in one

46

country. The extensive literature, covering the progress made in this field since the idea was

47

first explored in the 1990’s (Swartz & Hecking, 1991; Baxter et al, 1997), is reviewed

48

elsewhere (Suhaj & Korenovská, 2005; Capron, 2007; Giaccio & Vicentini, 2008;) and is not

49

discussed here.

50

In previous work (Coetzee et al., 2005; Coetzee & Vanhaecke, 2005; Vorster et al., 2010;

51

Coetzee et al., 2011) it was demonstrated that South African wines can be distinguished from

52

wines from Europe and that the interregional classification of wines within South Africa, is

53

possible using ICP-MS for multi-element and isotopic analysis (11B/10B ratio). The

2

54

correlation between the trace element composition of a wine and that of the provenance soil

55

was verified (Van der Linde et al., 2010).

56 57

In the current work, intraregional classification of wines from one region or part of a region

58

only, was investigated, in order to establish the limits and reliability of the application in the

59

relative small geographical area of a single wine district. The main objective was to ascertain

60

whether differentiation was possible at ward level or even at estate level. A section of the

61

Stellenbosch wine district, ranging from the Helderberg mountain in the south to the

62

Simonsberg mountain in the north and covering an area of about 1000 km2, was selected for

63

the study (See Figure 1). The area is characterised by a complex distribution of soil types and

64

this was taken into account in the selection of wards and estates included in this study. The

65

smaller the geographical demarcation is, the higher are the demands on the accuracy and

66

precision of the analytical data obtained by ICP-MS for successful classification. Diligent

67

application of quality control procedures to ensure reliable analytical data was therefore

68

required.

69 70

2. Materials and Methods

71 72

2.1 Wine samples

73

A total of 120 wine samples (93 red, 27 white), from 5 wards in the Stellenbosch area in the

74

Western Cape Wine Region, was collected from 23 estates and wine cellars during the first

75

quarter of 2010. In order to obtain a sufficient number of samples per estate, wines were

76

selected from the 2001 to 2010 vintages, depending on the availability of suitable samples at

77

the respective estates and cellars. The red cultivars consisted of Cabernet Sauvignon,

78

Cabernet Franc, Malbec, Merlot, Petit Verdot, Pinot Noir, Pinotage, and Shiraz. The white

3

79

cultivars were Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc, Chenin Blanc, Gewürztraminer, Semillon,

80

Viognier, and Weisser Riesling. All wines were made from grapes produced in identified

81

blocks pertaining to the particular estates. Table 1 lists the wards and estates/cellars plus

82

cellar codes and also gives the major soil types associated with the wards from where the

83

wines were sourced.

84

/ Insert Table 1 /

85

2.2 Soil characteristics

86

In previous work (Van der Linde et al., 2010), the link between the trace element

87

composition in a wine and that in the provenance soil was established for South African

88

wines. This is an essential precondition for the application of multi-element data and

89

multivariate statistical analysis to the classification of wines according to geographical origin.

90

In this work the complexity of soil type distributions in the Stellenbosch area was taken into

91

account in selecting wines from wards representative of different soil types.

92

The distribution of the soil types (Hartmann, 1969) in the sampling area is indicated by soil

93

type codes in Figure 1.

94

Three major soil types occur in the area where the wines were sourced.

95

These are:

96

• red kaolinic loams and clays of the granitic foothills (Code F2 and F3), for example

97

found in the Simonsberg-Stellenbosch ward on the western foothills of the

98

Simonsberg.

99

• duplex soils, mostly coarse alluvial sands and residual clays (Code D4S and D3S),

100

derived from granite and shale, for example found in the Stellenbosch-West ward.

101

• weakly developed hydromorphic soils derived from alluvial and fluvial sandy deposits

102

along rivers and streams (Code I1), for example, areas along the Eerste River in the

103

Stellenbosch West ward.

104

4

105

Small pockets of poorly developed loam shale-based soils (C2) and duplex fine sand or loam

106

top soils (DIL) are dispersed among the three major soil types contributing to the overall

107

complexity. These pockets are found in the Eerste River Valley between Lynedoch and the

108

river mouth in False Bay.

109

/ Insert Figure 1 /

110

It is clear from this picture that a ward could include any combination of three or more

111

different soil types. The approximate positions of the wards where wines were sourced are

112

indicated by ovals in Figure 1. The soil type alone is not necessarily an indication that trace

113

element differences between soil types would be sufficient to allow for successful provenance

114

determination. How this variability reflects the trace element composition of the soil is not

115

generally known. It was the aim of this work to establish whether these differences would

116

allow classification of wines according to estate.

117 118

2.3 Sample preparation

119

Volumetric equipment was soaked in 1% distilled HNO3 overnight and thoroughly rinsed

120

with Milli-Q water, before use. High purity 18 MΩ.cm water was obtained from a Milli-Q

121

purification system and was used in the preparation of all solutions. HNO3 was purified by

122

distillation in a sub-boiling quartz distillation system. High-purity ethanol was used for

123

preparing matrix-matched standards.

124 125

Wine samples were diluted 1:10 with distilled 1% HNO3 and indium was added as internal

126

standard (final concentration: 100 µg/L). The dilution reduced the ethanol concentration to

127

between 1.2 and 1.5% and residual sugar to < 0.3 g/L or 0.03% (because only wines

128

classified as “dry” were sourced), which was sufficiently low to diminish matrix effects and

129

plasma instability caused by organic matrices in the plasma during measurement.

5

130 131

The method blank was a 1.2% ethanol/1% HNO3 solution containing 100 µg/L of the In

132

internal standard. Standards were prepared in 1.2% ethanol/1% HNO3 by appropriate dilution

133

of 1000 mg/L single element Merck ICP standard stock solutions and the addition of 100

134

µg/L of the In internal standard. Two matrix-matched calibration standard series were

135

prepared to match the expected concentration ranges in wine of the 18 elements selected for

136

this study: Low Standard series: Al, B, Ba, Cu, Mn, Rb, Sr, Zn at 50, 250, 500 µg/L and Cd,

137

Co, Cs, Li, Ni, Tl, U, V at 5, 25, 50 µg/L. High Standard series: Ca, Mg at 5, 25, 50 mg/L

138 139

2.3 Quality control (QC)

140

A 100 µg/L Initial Calibration Verification (ICV) standard in 1.2% ethanol/1% HNO3 was

141

prepared from 1000 µg/L multi-element ICP standard (Merck) containing the elements: Ag,

142

Al, B, Ba, Bi, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ga, In, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Sr, Tl, Zn. The

143

multi-element standard already contained In, therefore no additional internal standard was

144

added.

145 146

Continuing calibration verification (CCV) standards were prepared from single element ICP

147

standards (Merck) consisting of 20 mg/L Ca, Mg for the high standard series and 250 µg/L

148

Al, B, Ba, Cu, Mn, Rb, Sr, Zn and 25 µg/L Cd, Co, Cs, Li, Ni, Tl, U, V, for the low standard

149

series. The CCV’s were measured after every 10 samples.

150 151

Duplicates of two white and two red wine samples were prepared.

152 153

Possible matrix effects were checked by running an interference check sample (ICS)

154

consisting of Ca (50 mg/L), Na (100 mg/L), Mg (250 mg/L), K (500mg/L). In addition, 6

155

spike recovery tests and serial dilutions were done on red wine and white wine samples. The

156

spiked samples were prepared at concentration levels of 20 and 100 µg/L for the elements Al,

157

Ba, Cu, and Sr and of 100 and 500 µg/L for the elements B, Mn, Rb and Zn. A serial dilution

158

check (1:10 followed by 1:3, thus 1:30 final dilution) was done on one white wine and one

159

red wine.

160 161

2.4 Instrumentation

162

Analyses were carried out with a quadrupole-based Thermo X-Series 2 inductively coupled

163

plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) equipped with nickel cones, a Peltier-cooled, low-

164

volume conical spray chamber fitted with a fixed impact bead and a high-performance glass

165

concentric nebuliser, a peristaltic sample delivery pump, and a Cetac 500 autosampler.

166

Instrument operating conditions were optimised for analysis of the diluted wine samples.

167

Mass calibration and detector cross-calibration were performed according to the instrument

168

manufacturer’s instructions, using the prescribed solutions obtained from Thermo. A

169

sensitivity check using a 10 µg/L Ba, Be, Bi, Ce, Co, In, Li, Ni, Pb, U tuning solution

170

preceded the start of the analytical measurements. The resulting performance report included

171

important sensitivity data, such as extent of formation of oxide ions (156CeO+/140Ce+) and

172

doubly charged ions (137Ba2+/137Ba+), in addition to count rates for the tuning solution

173

elements, whereby the optimisation status of the instrument could be assessed.

174

The nuclides measured, in order of mass number, were: 7Li, 11B, 24Mg, 27Al, 44Ca, 51V, 55Mn,

175

59

176

mostly metals and are considered to be useful as possible indicators of geographical origin

177

(Almeida & Vasconcelos, 2003; Thiel et al, 2004; Coetzee et al, 2005; Moreno et al, 2008;).

Co,

60

Ni,

65

Cu, 66Zn,

85

Rb,

88

Sr,

119

Cd,

133

Cs,

178 179

3. Results and Discussion 7

137

Ba,

205

Tl,

238

U. The elements selected are

180 181

3.1 Selection of elements

182

The 18 elements selected for this study in order of increasing atomic mass number, Li, B,

183

Mg, Al, Ca,V, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Rb, Sr, Cd, Cs, Ba, Tl, U, were chosen from the list of

184

elements shown in previous work on South African wines (Coetzee et al, 2005; Van der

185

Linde et al, 2010) to be useful indictors in wine provenance studies. The link between the

186

trace element composition of a wine and its provenance soil was verified for South African

187

wines for most elements in the list above (Van der Linde et al, 2010). ). Wine-making

188

technology can affect the trace element composition of a wine. Various studies have focused

189

on the effect of wine-making technologies on the elemental composition of a wine. Results

190

may vary from study to study and no consensus has been reached. A list of elements that

191

showed relatively small changes in concentration after bentonite treatment included the

192

elements Li, B, Mg, Ca, V, Mn, Fe, Co, Zn, Rb, Sr, Cs, Pb (Castiñeira Gómez Mdel, et al,

193

2004). Rare earths were found to be unsuitable indicator elements after bentonite treatment

194

(Jakubowski et al, 1999) because of large changes. In one study, it was found that B, K, Cu,

195

Zn, and Rb concentrations were actually decreased after bentonite treatment (Catarino et al,

196

2008). The selection of a set of indicator elements completely unaffected by the wine-making

197

process is not possible. In this work, the initial set of indicator elements was selected from

198

elements considered to be less prone to alteration by wine-making processes.

199 200

The average elemental concentrations for each estate are given in Table 2(a) and 2(b). The

201

concentrations of Co, Cd, and U were found to be less than the limit of quantification (LoQ)

202

of the method in the diluted wine matrix and were not used in data analysis.

203

/Insert Table 2/

204

8

205

3.2 QC Results

206

Quality control procedures included measures to ensure proper calibration of the instrument,

207

assessment of matrix effects, and interference checks. The relative percentage difference:

208

RPD = 100*(i ‒ r)/i

209

where i is the initial or known value and r is the repeat value calculated for each element,

210

between the repeat analyses of QC samples, was used to assess the validity of the

211

measurements.

212 213

Detector calibration was performed using two matrix-matched standard series with the

214

analytical ranges chosen to comply with the expected concentrations (Coetzee et al, 2005) of

215

each selected element in the wine. An initial calibration verification (ICV) sample, prepared

216

from a multi-element ICP standard (Merck), was included in the ICP-MS measurement

217

protocol following the external standards, to confirm the validity of the calibration.

218

Measurement was discontinued in case RPDs for the ICV > 10% were established.

219

Continuing calibration verification (CCV) samples and blank samples were measured after

220

each 10-sample cycle to assess possible instrument drift and build-up of cross-contamination

221

between samples. RPD values of < 5% were achieved for all elements except B and Ca at
3 wines per estate

287

criterion and no further data analysis was done on the white wine subset. A repeat of the

288

cluster analysis, on the red wine subset only, shows the 17 estates reporting membership in

289

three clusters. Only two wines, O2, and U6 report in a cluster different from the other wines

290

from the O and U estates.

291 292

Discriminant analysis (DA) of the red wine subset consisting of 88 wines from 17 estates was

293

done using loge-transformed concentrations of the PCA-selected elements plus. Loge-

294

transformed concentrations, bringing high and low abundances within the same range,

295

allowed element concentrations used in the statistical procedures to vary by orders of

296

magnitude. Kolmogorov-Smirnov analyses confirmed normality of the data with p-values >

297

0.05 in most cases. Pearson correlation analyses indicated acceptable linearity of the data

298

with a sufficient number of single element pairs showing significant correlations.

299

Importantly, no multicollinearity was observed. The result was confirmed using Spearman

300

correlation analysis.

301

A scatter plot, Figure 2, of the two discriminant functions shows a differentiation of the

302

estates into three groups. The grouping of the estates corresponds with the results obtained

303

using cluster analysis.

304

12

305

/Insert Figure 2/

306

A further DA was then performed on each of the clusters. In Figure 3, scatter plots, of the

307

discriminant functions obtained in this way, show the classification of wines from each estate

308

within a cluster. In all three clusters 95‒100% of the original grouped cases (estates) were

309

correctly classified. In cross-validation 80% of the cases were correctly classified in cluster 1

310

and 2 while 30% was correctly classified in cluster 3. In the latter case some wines were

311

erroneously classified in estate M with the largest number of wines. This, together with the

312

fact that the centroids of the estates M and SH lie close together in the scatter plot shown in

313

Figure 3, could contribute to the low percentage in cross-validation. Box’s test of covariance

314

matrices, however, failed in some cases to be as expected, because of the insufficient number

315

of wines available per estate.

316

/Insert Figure 3/

317

The complexity of the soil type distribution across wards, with similar soil types occurring in

318

different wards, precluded classification of the wine according to ward.

319

Nevertheless, the three clusters identified by applying cluster analysis and duplicated by

320

discriminant analysis, seem to coincide with particular wards and a set of soil types for that

321

area:

322



323 324

soil types F3/D3S/I1 •

325 326 327

Cluster 1: Blaauwklippen/ Helderberg wards including estates A, B, G, I, P and major Cluster 2: Stellenbosch West ward including estates C, E, V in the southern areas of the ward and major soil types F2/DIL/C2



Cluster 3: Simonsberg ward including estates M, R, U and major soil types F3/D4S

These clusters are indicated by ovals in Figure 1.

328 329

Stellenbosch West cellars in the northern area of the ward around Lyndoch, W and SH, were

330

classified in Cluster 3, where D4S soils predominate. Since D4S/D3S soils also occur in the

331

Lynedoch area, this classification seems plausible. Schaapenberg cellars, G and X, were

13

332

classified in Cluster 1 together with cellars from the Helderberg area. These areas, on the

333

south and north side of Helderberg mountain, share similar soil type distributions.

334 335

4. Conclusion

336 337

The results for the intraregional classification of wines from selected wards in the

338

Stellenbosch wine district in the Western Cape, suggest that classification of wines at estate

339

level is indeed possible using reliable multi-element chemical analysis and multivariate

340

statistical analysis based on a combination of cluster analysis (CA) and discriminant analysis

341

(DA). The statistical results, obtained from two independent multivariate procedures (DA and

342

CA), were in agreement and this strengthens the interpretation. The area from where the

343

wines were sourced was less than 1000 km2. To obtain successful classifications from such a

344

small area requires accurate analytical data. Much attention was therefore given to quality

345

control in the ICP-MS analysis procedures to ensure that the trace element concentrations of

346

the indicator elements are correct. In previous work the validity of this approach, to classify

347

wines according to geographical origin, was adequately proven for comparing wines from

348

different countries and different regions within one country. This work, for the first time,

349

demonstrates the applicability of the method for intraregional classification of wines from a

350

relatively small geographical area. Even more remarkable is the fact that classification of

351

wines pertaining to each estate was achieved. The result is evidently dependent on the

352

distribution of soil types in the area and, hence, the variability in trace element composition

353

of the soils. While exact correlation between soil type and wine classification was beyond the

354

scope of this work, three clusters in the area could be distinguished, corresponding with

355

combinations of major soil types found in the area.

14

356

It was demonstrated by CA that white wines, at the level of differences in trace element

357

composition encountered in the area, constitute a separate cluster and cannot be included in a

358

data set together with red wines. In interregional classifications where differences in soil

359

composition are larger, it was found that red and white wines could be grouped together in

360

one data set to enable successful classification.

361 362

Acknowledgements

363 364

The authors thank Francois October from ARC-Nietvoorbij Stellenbosch, for sourcing and

365

collecting wine samples and Juliana van Staden from STATKON, University of

366

Johannesburg Statistical Services, for performing multivariate statistical analysis of the data.

367 368 369

References 1. Baxter, M. J., Crewes, H.M., Dennis, M. J., Goodall, I., & Anderson, D. (1997). The

370

determination of the authenticity of wine from its trace element composition. Food

371

Chemistry, 60, 4433-450.

372

2. Almeida, C.M.R., & Vasconcelos, M.T.S.D. (2003). Multielement composition of wines

373

and their precursors including provenance soil and their potentialities as fingerprints of

374

wine origin. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51, 4788-4798.

375

3. Angus, N.S., O'Keeffe, T.J., Stuart, K.R., & Miskelly, G.M. (2006). Regional

376

classification of New Zealand red wines using inductively-coupled plasma-mass

377

spectrometry (ICP-MS). Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 12, 170-176.

378

4. Capron, X., Smeyers-Verbeke, J., & Massart, D.L. (2007). Multivariate determination

379

of the geographical origin of wines from four different countries. Food Chemistry, 101,

380

1585-1597.

15

381

5. Castiñeira Gómez Mdel, M., Brandt, R., Jakubowski, N. & Anderson, J.T. (2004).

382

Changes of metal composition in German white wines through the winemaking process.

383

A study of 63 elements by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Journal of

384

Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52, 2953-2961.

385

6. Catarino, S., Monteiro, F., Rocha F., Curvelo-Garcia, A.S., & De Sousa, R.B. (2008).

386

Effect of bentonite characteristics on the elemental composition of wine. Journal of

387

Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56, 158-165

388

7. Coetzee, P.P., Steffens, F.E., Eiselen, R.J., Augustyn, O.P., Balcaen L., & Vanhaecke F.

389

(2005). Multi-element analysis of South-African wines by ICP-MS and their

390

classification according to geographical origin. Journal of Agricultural and Food

391

Chemistry, 53, 5060-5066.

392

8. Coetzee, P.P., & Vanhaecke, F. (2005). Classifying wine according to geographical

393

origin via quadrupole-based ICP–mass spectrometry measurements of boron isotope

394

ratios. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 383, 977-984.

395

9. Coetzee, P.P., Greeff, L., & Vanhaecke, F. (2011). ICP-MS measurement of

11

B/10B

396

isotope ratios in grapevine leaves and the investigation of possible boron isotope

397

fractionation in grapevine plants. South African Journal of Enolology and Viticulture,

398

32, 28-34.

399

10. Di Paola-Naranjo, R.D., Baroni, M.V., Podio, N.S., Rubinstein, H.R., Fabani, M.P.,

400

Badini, R.G., Inga, M., Ostera, H.A., Cagnoni, M., Gallegos, E., Gautier, E., Peral-

401

García, P., Jurian Hoogewerff, J., & Wunderlin, D.A. (2011). Fingerprints for main

402

varieties of Argentinean wines: terroir differentiation by inorganic, organic, and stable

403

isotopic analyses coupled to chemometrics. Journal of Agricultural and Food

404

Chemistry, 59, 7854-7865.

16

405

11. Fabani, M.P., Arrúa, R.C., Vázquez, F., Diaz, M.P., Baroni, M.V., & Wunderlin, D.A.

406

(2010). Evaluation of elemental profile coupled to chemometrics to assess the

407

geographical origin of Argentinean wines. Food Chemistry, 119, 372-379.

408

12. Fabrina, R., Bentlin, S., Pulgati, F.H., Dressler, V.L., & Pozebon, D. (2011). Elemental

409

analysis of wines from South America and their classification according to country.

410

Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, 22, 327-336.

411

13. Galgano, F., Favati, F., Caruso, M., Scarpa, T., & Palma, A. (2008). Analysis of trace

412

elements in southern Italian wines and their classification according to provenance,

413

Food Science and Technology, 41, 1808-1815.

414

14. Giaccio, M., & Vicentini, A. (2008). Determination of the geographical origin of wines

415

by means of the mineral content and the stable isotope ratios: A Review. Journal of

416

Commodity Science Technology and Quality, 47, 267-284.

417

15. Gonzálvez, A. Llorens, A., Cervera, M.L., Armenta, S., & De la Guardia, M. (2009).

418

Elemental fingerprint of wines from the protected designation of origin Valencia. Food

419

Chemistry, 112, 26-34.

420

16. Gremaud, G., Quaile, S., & Piantini, U. (2004). Characterization of Swiss vineyards

421

using isotopic data in combination with trace elements and classical parameters.

422

European Food Research and Technology, 219, 97-104.

423

17. Hartmann, M. O. (1969). The soil heterogeneity of some soils in the South Western

424

Cape Province and its relationship to soil classification. Thesis (M.Sc.), University of

425

Stellenbosch.

426

18. Jakubowski,N., Brandt, R., Stuerwer, D., Eschnauer, H.R., & Görtges, S. (1999).

427

Analysis of wines by ICP-MS: Is the pattern of the rare earth elements a reliable

428

fingerprint for the provenance? Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 364, 424-

429

428.

17

430

19. Kelly, S., Heaton, K., & Hoogewerff, J. (2005). Tracing the geographical origin of food:

431

The application of multi-element and multi-isotope analysis. Trends in Food Science

432

and Technology, 16, 555-567.

433

20. Laurie, V.F., Villagra, E., Tapia, J., Sarkis, J.E.S., & Hortellani, M.A. (2010). Analysis

434

of major metallic elements in Chilean wines by atomic absorption spectroscopy, Ciencia

435

e Investgación Agraria, 37, 77-85.

436

21. Martin, G. J., Mazure, M., & Jouitteau, C. (1999). Characterization of the geographic

437

origin of Bordeaux wines by a combined use of isotopic and trace element

438

measurements. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 50, 409-417.

439

22. Moreno, I.M., Gonzalez-Weller, D., Gutierrez, V., Marino, M., Camean, A.M.,

440

Gonzalez, A.G., & Hardisson, A. (2008). Determination of Al, Ba, Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg,

441

Mn, Na, Sr and Zn in red wine samples by inductively coupled plasma optical emission

442

spectroscopy: Evaluation of preliminary sample treatments. Microchemical Journal, 88,

443

56-61.

444 445

23. Orescanin, V., Katunar, A., Kutle, A., & Valkovic, V. (2003). Heavy metals in soil, grape, and wine. Journal of Trace and Microprobe Techniques, 21, 171-180.

446

24. Serapinas, P., Venskutonis, P.R., Aninkevičius, V., Ežerinskis, Ž., Galdikas, A., &

447

Juzikienė, V. (2008). Step by step approach to multi-element data analysis in testing the

448 449

provenance of wines. Food Chemistry, 107, 1652-1660.

450 451 452 453

25. Suhaj, M., & Korenovská, M. (2005). Application of elemental analysis for identification of wine origin: A review. Acta Alimentaria, 34, 393-401. 26. Schwartz, R.S., & Hecking, L.T. (1991). Determination of geographic origin of agricultural products by multivariate-analysis of trace element composition. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 6, 637-642.

18

454

27. Tarantilis, P.A., Troianou, V.E., Pappas, C.S., Kotseridis, Y.S., & Polissiou, M.G.

455

(2008). Differentiation of Greek red wines on the basis of grape variety using attenuated

456

total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Food Chemistry, 111, 192–

457

196.

458

28. Taylor, V.F., Longerich, H.P., & Greenough, J.D. (2003). Multielement analysis of

459

Canadian wines by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and

460

multivariate statistics. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51, 856-860.

461

29. Thiel, G., Geisler, G., & Blechschmidt, I. (2004). Determination of trace elements in

462

wines and classification according to their provenance. Analytical and Bioanalytical

463

Chemistry, 378, 1630-1636.

464

30. Tzouros, N. E., & Arvanitoyannis I. S. (2001). Agricultural produces: Synopsis of

465

employed quality control methods for the authentication of foods and application of

466

chemometrics for the classification of foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and

467

Nutrition, 41, 287-319.

468

31. Van der Linde, G., Fischer J.L. & Coetzee, P.P. (2010). Multi-element analysis of South

469

African wines and their provenance soils by ICP-MS and their classification according

470

to geographical origin using multivariate statistics. South African Journal of Enolology

471

and Viticulture, 31, 143-153.

472

32. Vorster, C., Greeff, L., & Coetzee, P.P. (2010). The determination of

473

87

474

African wine. South African Journal of Chemistry, 63, 207–214.

11

B/10B and

Sr/86Sr isotope ratios by quadrupole-based ICP-MS for the fingerprinting of South

475 476 477 478 479 480

Figure Captions Figure 1. Map of soil type distribution in the sampling area. The map area represents ca 1000 km2. The ovals indicate the position of the clusters as identified by cluster analysis and discriminant analysis: Cluster 1 incorporating the wines from the wards Helderberg,

19

481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491

Blaauwklippen and Schaapenberg, Cluster 2 incorporating the wines from the Stellenbosch West ward, and Cluster 3 incorporating the wines from the Simonsberg ward. Figure 2. Canonical discriminant functions plot for red wines from 17 estates showing estates grouped into three clusters. Figure 3. Canonical discriminant functions plot for red wines from 17 estates showing estates reporting in (a) Cluster 1, (b) Cluster 2 (c) Cluster 3.

20

492 493

21

494 495

22

496 497

23

498

499

500 501 24

502 503 504

Table 1. Sample details of the sourced wines, listing cellars, cellar codes, and major soil type codes of the wards. ward/pocket

soil type

estate/cellar

cellar code

red wine

white wine

F3 D4S I1

Blaauwklippen Dornier Kleine Zalze Stellenzicht Waterford

B I Z S T

6 6 2 5 1

1 1 3

F3 D3S I1 C2

Avontuur Croyden Post House Ridgemor

A C P C

4 6 6 1

F2/F3 I1

Morgenster Vergelegen

G X

10

F3 D4S C2

Delheim L’Avenir Morgenhof Rustenberg Uitkyk

D L M R U

3 4 6 4 4

3 2

N O SH W

3 3 4 4

2 3

E E V

1 4 6

1 1

Blaauwklippen

Helderberg 2 1

Schaapenberg 3

Simonsberg

Stellenbosch West-Lynedoch D3S/D4S Neethlingshof Overgaauw I1 Stellenbosch Hills Welmoed Stellenbosch West-Faure I1 The Foundry F2 Meerlust DIL Vergenoegd

505 506

25

2 2

507

Table 2(a). Average elemental concentrations (µ µg/L) per estate/cellar. Light elements. Estate MDL B S I E G C P A D L M R U SH V W O

508 509

Li

0.02 0.19±0.09 0.15±0.01 0.19±0.10 0.23±0.03 0.10±0.02 0.15±0.06 0.08±0.01 0.20±0.18 0.19±0.04 0.19±0.05 0.12±0.03 0.04±0.01 0.24±0.09 0.12±0.05 0.42±0.13 0.22±0.13 0.22±0.21

B

Mg

15 746±117 479±30 633±115 632±76 579±51 603±60 513±32 503±105 762±105 852±103 636±84 612±119 672±54 657±79 839±117 860±160 674±257

2.5 12045±1947 12686±1647 12500±2210 14024±1844 11141±1211 11670±1241 11150±1061 11170±1364 12717±1094 11915±1412 13418±1527 12428±2493 13658±1803 11309±1209 10978±951 12333±1030 9711±1258

Al 0.43 32.7±7.6 64.0±20.5 19.1±7.1 49.7±11.8 24.5±3.7 43.3±9.0 36.3±7.7 27.1±5.5 45.3±6.6 39.8±12.1 21.4±5.3 22.5±4.8 27.3±14.9 20.9±3.0 26.3±10.9 28.1±3.4 47.2±36.3

Ca

270 8499±796 8453±756 9788±743 7479±1817 10343±557 7636±1716 7678±1528 9065±649 9839±811 6174±132 4197±419 3961±833 3789±766 4086±538 4859±1820 4258±477 4332±277

V

0.01 0.06±0.01 0.46±0.83 0.05±0.01 0.18±0.05 0.06±0.01 0.18±0.02 0.08±0.02 0.07±0.01 0.86±0.37 1.40±1.13 0.04±0.01 0.03±0.01 1.01±1.89 0.04±0.01 0.32±0.40 0.08±0.02 0.32±0.42

Mn 0.07 169±22 184±35 137±12 228±55 56±20 184±21 105±23 190±113 203±28 187±32 130±40 180±61 167±28 97±20 172±32 108±22 94±44

Table 2(b). Average elemental concentrations (µ µg/L) per estate/cellar. Heavy elements. Estate MDL B S I E G C P A D L M R U N SH V W O

Ni 0.07 0.84±0.14 1.15±0.19 1.11±1.29 1.38±0.36 1.40±0.20 1.37±0.28 0.57±0.11 0.42±0.06 0.45±0.06 0.95±0.19 0.68±0.21 0.43±0.12 0.89±0.23 0.42±0.12 0.59±0.07 1.26±0.45 0.60±0.04 1.01±0.50

Cu 0.16 4.12±1.91 7.58±5.38 8.38±4.98 4.32±1.87 10.5±5.61 3.22±1.51 11.5±5.1 10.7±5.3 4.43±2.31 5.04±1.41 2.79±1.13 1.24±1.21 21.1±4.1 8.87±0.50 10.7±1.4 6.44±2.94 1.26±0.13 6.10±2.25

Zn 0.11 23±10 84±24 81±23 76±4 41±11 50±18 23±19 32±13 30±5 82±23 35±10 44±26 65±11 84±25 45±12 62±14 38±11 62±6

Rb 0.04 282±61 442±117 451±238 271±140 291±93 176±67 227±82 199±40 477±75 259±19 242±68 568±217 630±89 464±10 242±78 229±38 416±142 412±251

510 511

26

Sr 0.02 42±4 64±24 41±11 107±17 86±18 102±18 70±19 50±5 50±9 62±15 55±19 54±16 84±10 77±1 65±21 97±10 59±14 56±29

Cs 0.001 0.79±0.34 1.77±0.79 1.65±0.77 1.03±0.92 1.82±1.33 0.30±0.21 0.42±0.14 0.91±0.12 0.90±0.07 0.44±0.10 0.91±0.38 3.06±2.07 1.60±0.10 1.79±0.41 1.43±1.09 0.86±0.44 6.71±4.11 1.22±0.72

Ba 0.02 4.80±1.15 9.52±2.80 5.67±2.54 21.8±3.1 15.4±4.4 10.3±5.8 10.6±1.8 8.03±3.82 14.2±3.4 17.2±3.1 22.2±9.1 48.3±24.2 29.4±2.1 17.2±6.1 14.7±4.7 12.1±2.2 11.8±5.1 12.0±8.1

Tl 0.003 0.028±0.009 0.072±0.016 0.032±0.014 0.071±0.031 0.029±0.016 0.027±0.051 0.035±0.020 0.061±0.041 0.037±0.042 0.004±0.008 0.062±0.021 0.073±0.032 0.071±0.013 0.153±0.042 0.114±0.082 0.064±0.023 0.096±0.010 0.056±0.013

512 513 514 515 516 517 518

Highlights • • • •

Intraregional classification of wines according to estate by elemental fingerprinting. Wines sourced from estates within a small wine-producing area < 1000 km2. Red and white wines grouped in separate data sets for statistical analysis. Correlation between soil type distributions and wine classification observed.

27

Intraregional classification of wine via ICP-MS elemental fingerprinting.

The feasibility of elemental fingerprinting in the classification of wines according to their provenance vineyard soil was investigated in the relativ...
2MB Sizes 3 Downloads 3 Views