Vol. 86, No. 4, 1979
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
February 28, 1979
Pages
INTERFERENCE
OF GONADOTROPIN-RECEPTOR M.R.
INTERACTION
Sairam
and
M.I.
BY SYNTHETIC
1214-1221
ESTROGENS
Berman
Reproduction Research Laboratory Research Institute of Montreal 110 Pine Avenue West Montreal, Quebec H2W lR7, Canada
Clinical
and
Received
January
19,
the
University
of
Montreal
1979 SUMMARY
In in u&o studies, the synthetic estrogens diethylstilbestrol and diethylstilbestrol sodium phosphate inhibited the binding of 1251 ovine lutropin to the rat ovarian receptor and 1251 ovine follitropin to the bovine testicular receptor. As the lutropin binding to receptor is affected to a greater extent, a preferential inhibitory effect may be suggested. Removal of the estrogens from the incubation medium by washing does not restore gonadotropin binding ability,indicating a strong effect. The two compounds were effective in displacing the labeled gonadotropin from the preformed receptor-hormone complex. This effect increased with time of incubation. It appears unlikely that the interference of gonadotropinreceptor interaction may be because of increased hormone and/or receptor degradation by the two compounds. INTRODUCTION Like
many
appears
other to
be
at
the
receptors
for
lutropin
the
and
testis
ovary
been
carried
steroids effects we
out on
of
We have
and
X/79/041
of
the
site
the
cell
and
the
now
that
extended
interfere
studies
gonadotropins
Very
end
products
the
a recent
action
and
gonadotropin-receptor
on
specific
been
1,2).
receptor-hormone
these with
have
During lutropin
the
Accordingly,
(see of
itself.
suspect
of
(FSH)
influence
on
action
membrane.
animals
binding
to
of
follitropin
different
compounds
evidence
the
0006-291
of
(LH)
estrogenic
estrogens
Abbreviations Gonadotropin; T--Testosterone; Diethylstilbestrol
level
hormone
synthetic ovary
a principal
regarding
the
obtained
affected.
Copyright All rights
hormones
demonstrated few
studies such
study rat
on
Leydig
interaction demonstrate
in have
as
the
the
direct
cells
(3)
might here
interaction
be
that in
testis.
used: LH--1utropin; E2--Estradiol 178; A--Androstenedione; sodium phosphate
FSH--Follitropin; HCG--Human Chorionic E2B--Estradiol benzoate; P--Progesterone; DES--Diethylstilbestrol; DES-NaP-(Honvol).
214-08$01.00/O
@ 1979 by Academic Press, Inc. of reproduction in any form reserved.
1214
both
Vol.
86,
No.
4, 1979
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
MATERIALS
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
AND METHODS
A crude membrane fraction from pseudopregnant rat ovaries (4) was used as a preparation of highly specific lutropin receptor. Follitropin receptor in the form of a partially purified membrane fraction was prepared from adult bull testis (5) using a modified procedure (6). Both receptor preparations were employed either immediately or after being frozen at -700 for several months, as no difference in binding ability was perceptible between the two forms. Highly purified ovine pituitary lutropin and follitropin isolated in this laboratory and human follitropin supplied by NIH were used for iodination with carrier free 1251 (6) by the lactoperoxidase method. The labeled hormones purified on Sephadex G-100 column had a specific activity of about 50-80 @i/ug and exhibited good binding characteristics. The labeled hormones were used within two weeks of preparation. Each i ncubBinding assays were done in disposable 12 x 75 mm glass tubes. ation mixture contained 100 ~1 of the sample in the assay buffer and 400 1~1 of a suspension of the appropriate receptor plus the labeled hormone added as a single aliquot. The total volume was 0.5 ml in the assay buffer,which was 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 containing 10 mM MgCl and 0.1% bovine serum two hours at the end albumin (Sigma). The tubes were incubated at 37 8 C for of which the reaction was terminated by addition of 2 ml cold assay buffer. The tubes were centrifuged at about 2500 x g for lo-15 mins. After aspiration of the supernatant,the bound radioactivity in the pellet was counted in a Beckman autogamma Spectrometer. Tubes designated for non-specific binding contained 1000 fold excess of the unlabeled hormone. The were tion
compounds dissolved of ethanol
to
be evaluated in ethanol. were always
for effects on Suitable controls employed.
hormone-receptor receiving
interaction, same concentra-
the
In experiments where the effect on preformed hormone-receptor complex was examined, the receptor preparation was incubated as above with the labeled hormone at 37OC for 2 hrs and washed once with buffer and then resuspended in the original volume of 0.5 ml containing either buffer, ethanol, hormone or the various compounds. They were incubated at 37OC and at specified intervals (up to 24 hrs) triplicate sets were removed, diluted with buffer and the pellet separated ag~ain as above. Radioactivity in the pellet was determined and expressed as percentage of the original binding found during the formation of the first 2 hr receptor-hormone complex. The steroids E2, E2B, St.Louis. The clinically derivative was donated supplied as an aqueous DES-Nap concentrations All
solutions
were
P,
T and A and the DES were obtained used form of DES as its sodium by Horner Laboratories, Montreal. solution was directly diluted with are shown in DES equivalents,
prepared
fresh
just
prior
to
from Sigma, phosphate This compound the assay buffer.
use,
RESULTS Effects
on
binding
Among only binding
the
synthetic of
the
of
the
lz51
different
and
estrogenic
estrogens labeled
lutropin
DES and
gonadotropins
1251
follitropin
compounds ‘DES-Nap to
1215
the
and
to other
significantly receptors
their
receptors
steroids
tested*
interfered as
seen
in
tiith Fig.
1.
.
Vol. 86, No. 4, 1979
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
A- I’25-LUTt?OPIN 100
1
80 60
0 N.S.
Q&30)
30-50
m
E2B (20)
10 DES
/(g
l-7
1044
40 20 DES-NaP
10
l-5
VA (30) GTOH
STEROID
B- I’2S-FOLLITROPIN
80
-
60
1
J1
0
N.S. E2[30)
-
40-10030
E2B (201 )(9
20 DES
5-W
P,T;Af30) *ETOH
STEROID
Figure 1. Effect of estrogens on 1251-lutropin (A) and lz51 human follitropin (8) binding to receptor. In each experiment about 1 mg ovarian or testicular membrane protein was incubated with 80-~OO,OOO cpm of labeled hormone (about 1 ng) and the various compounds. The tubes with a total The % volume of 0.5 ml (see methods) were incubated at 37OC for 2 hrs. bound in absence of the unlabeled hormone (zero binding) which was 20% of the added radioactivity is considered as 100%. Non specific binding in this and other experiments represent cpm found in presence of 1 1-19 of highly purified unlabeled hormone. Data in this and subsequent figures represent mean f SEM. In subsequent studies E2, E2B, P, T, A were found to be without influence at 50-100 1-19. EtOH = ethanol control. The DES-Nap also gave a dose dependent inhibition (20-400 pg) in panel B (data not shown).
DES at
approximately
the
ovarian
ding
seen
It Very
thus
0.037
receptor at appears
similar
higher that effects
by
mM reduced about
50%.
concentrations the were
degree observed
the The was
of
binding
of
maximum of
the
inhibition with
1216
lutropin
inhibition order is
DES-Nap.
lz51
of dose The
of 75-80% related inhibitory
to
specific in
bin-
2 hrs.
(Fig.
1A). effect
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 86, No. 4, 1979
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
A
50 40-
I 1
0.1 0‘ 2
56
uJ
48
I 10
I 100
ng LUTROPlN B
40 2ojlg
DES 0,
32
'.
8-
1
0.1 0.1
10 10
too too
ng FOlllTROPlN
Figure response represent laboratory.
of
2. of
DES on
that
Influence of varying DES levels A-lutropin and B-follitropin highly purified ovine lutropin
follitropin-receptor
observed
with
The evident
in
Fig.
evaluated 20
pg
with
Effects
in DES,
pellets,
dependent 2A and
ts
preincubat
incubated recovered
effect
of
(Fig.
where
the
DES on
16)
increasing
with
the by
is
was
much
less
than
systems
is
more
clearly
the
the two
slope
and
respective
compounds
centrifugation
assay
for were
1217
of
virtually
estrogens
experiments,
two
concentrations
receptor,
-iI on with
the
radioreceptor
n dose-response
and
these
2B, of
lutrop
follitropin
of
interactions
assay doseSl555BR in this
lutropin.
presence the
In first
dose
on the radioreceptor (human). Sl322AR and and foflitropin isolated
responses
DES.
In
were presence
obliterated, is
reduced
washing
2 hrs washed
whereas
progressively.
on
receptor
gonadotropin preparations
at thrice
of
37OC. with
binding were
The the
membrane assay
Vol. 86, No. 4, 1979
buffer
and
then
follitropin
ug
NaP
not
easily
soluble
effectively of
on Both
3.
at
37’C
With
over
24 (Fig.
unlabeled
lutropin.
of
of the
loss
more
the
stable
led
Fig.
of
the
the
38).
It
estrogens
were
the
was
bound
same DES-
compound
suggest
an
would
effective
membranes.
the
of
and
at to
end
its
be
in
hrs,
was
remains
the
by
unlabeled
that,
again
case
of
the
to
relatively the
after
bound 24
hrs.
follitropin, higher the
the
a fraction
contrast
of
bound
any
enhanced
only In
dissociation
noted
necessary
24
of of
also
complex
still
may
of
absence
presence
receptor.
significant
displaced
the
in
incubation
in
estrogens
follitropin
was
described
hormone by
the
preformed
complex,
increased synthetic
the
experiments
bound
the
amount
estrogens.
by
of
testis
hormone
the
Since
dissociation
shown
bound
Although
bound
the
loss
hormone
a substantial
loosely
receptor-hormone
of
bull
50 1-19 of
procedure.
the
with
complex
as
remained the
(Fig.
on
1251-
receptor
with
results
sites
release
bound
lutropin
3A,
synthetic
to
gonado-
subsequent
lutropin
the
These
lutropin
This
the
occurs,
in
tion
hrs
receptor,
hormone As
ovarian
of
washing
enhanced
Inclusion
labeled
lutropin
the
3A).
of
the
buffers,
complexes
additives
rate
by
DES-Nap
or
the
gonadotropin-receptor
DES and
1251-lutropin
receptor
binding
gonadotropin-receptor figure
of
washing.
gonadotropin
the
inhibition
follitropin
aqueous
by
preformed
The
reversed
in
removed
alteration
the
be
of
preincubation
or
DES-Nap, could
Effects
by
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
presence
2 hrs.~
caused
DES or
is
in
another
binding,
compounds,
be
reincubated
for
tropin 20
BIOCHEMICAL
or
concentra-
follitropin
receptor.
DISCUSSION These
studies
synthetic and
estrogens
follitropin
indicated with
demonstrate can with elsewhere
lutropin
that
binding
structurally
directly
the (3) to
affect
ovarian the the
unrelated
and
the
rat
specific
testicular
estrogenic
1218
such
interaction receptors
compounds
testicular
hormones,
receptor.
also
of
as lutropin
respectively. effectively It
may
the
As interfere
be
noted
that
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 86, No. 4, 1979
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
o--o DES OJg) b--h
80
DES -NaP($g
)
60 40 2 s
NONE/ETOH
20 N.S.
z
I
I 8
I 4
I 12
I 16
I 20
I 24
HOURS Figure 3. Effect of the synthetic estrogens on the preformed hormoneIncubations were A-lutropin, B-ovine follitropin. receptor complex. After the formation of the initial gonadotropindone as shown in figure 1. the pellet was washed once with the assay buffer receptor complex (2 hrs) volume (0.5 ml) with the indicated and reincubated at 370C in the original At specified intervals triplicates were removed and the reaction substances. centrifuged and radioactivity stopped by addition of 2 ml cold buffer, All values are represented as % of the original in the pellet determined. binding found during the first 2 hr incubation which was 40% and 42% For reasons of clarity the SEM of the added CPM in A and B respectively. bars are omitted as triplicates varied less than 3%. EtOH = ethanol. NS = non specific binding.
the
concentrations
the
ID50
0.037 It
for
mM and has
been
inhibition 1 nM noted
(7)
for of
for
recently
indicating
the
that
in
significantly the
inhibition
125 I lutropin
respectively
can
concentrations, receptors
required
binding
DES and
ovine
rather to
1251-hCG
sensitivity
tissue.
1219
the
lutropin
hypophysectomized reduce
greater
are
rats, binding of
the
For
high. ovarian
receptor
(Figs.
1 and
DES at to
instance,
the
lower testicular
hormone-deprived
is 2).
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 86, No. 4, 1979
In
all
testicular
the
receptor
increase
the in
labeled
hCG
(cited
of
this
hormone
on
lutropin these
binding
ability
dislodging
by not
or
DES-Nap
It
is
aware
unlikely and/or
be
as
without
follitropin
at
equivalent
noted
that
50 ug
to con-
preincubation
prevented
rat,
the
DES
subsequent treatment
significantly
&
ViVO
altering
the that the
fail
to
and
the
cells
produce
in
frequently
thus
of
apparently
effect
the
been
number
in of
present
studies
bind
the
the
utilized
follitropin
cannot
progesterone
preferential noted
v-LAXO
DES,has
Such
8,~).
of
action
the
of
DES or induce
the
gonadotropin
showed
that
studies
presence
DES and might
may
estrogens
bind
to
DES-Nap
explain
synthetic
from
This
the
estrogens
the
preformed
membrane
which
have
estrogens
shown
a direct
or
peptide,protein
could
be enhancing
resulting supposition
with
in
decreased
is
supported in complex
the
estrogens
gonadotropin binding
binding. of hormone
the
com-
effective
hormone-receptor
subsequent
receptor
unknown.
(receptor)
were
preparations
blocked
remains
membrane
changes
receptors. the
gonadotropin’ the
synthetic
conformational
hormone of
the
DES-Nap
effectively of
estrogen
observations.
labeled
washing
to
may
male
cells
direct
Preincubation
followed
hormone
which the
3).
We are
and
The
viva
of
the
(see
subsequently
data
of
degree
such
DES,
granulosa
10)
in
that
and
(Fig.
in (11).
possible
of
it
receptor
of
ovary
mechanism
ponents
the
of
the
in
The
lower
hypophysectomized
action
receptor
of
a much
binding
(7).
number
sites
dose
the
the
However,
lutropin
mitogenic
binding
by
In
here,
to
3).
a large
binding
is
affected
affects
The
shown
2 and
binding.
follitropin
It
1, with
preferentially
some
was
(Figs.
follitropin
to
experiments
receptor
centrations of
the
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
degradation
labeled
DES
receptors. of
the
receptor. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This investigation was supported (Honvol) was generously supplied FSH (NIH-HS-1) was supplied by Bethesda.
by by the
grants Horner Hormone
1220
from the Laboratories, Distribution
MRC
of Canada. Montreal. Officer at
DES-Nap The human NIAMDD,
Vol. 86, No. 4, 1979
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
REFERENCES 1.
Ryan,
R.J.
and
Lee,
2.
Catt,
K.J.
and
Dufau,
3.
Sairam,
4.
Lee, 228-233.
5.
Cheng,
6.
Sairam,
7.
Hsueh, 103,
M.R. C.Y.
and
and
C.Y. M.L.
Berman,
Ryan,
K.W.
A.J.W.,
(1976)
Clin.
M.L.,
16-29. 14,
(Submitted
J.
Clin.
l-15. for
Endocrinol.
Endocrinol. in
14,
Reprod.
Steroids
Endocrinol., Dufau,
Reprod. Biol.
(1975)
J.
J.
Biol.
M.I.
R.J.
(1575)
M.R.
(1976)
Metab.
publication). Metab.
41,
40,
581-589.
press.
and
Catt,
K.J.
(1878)
Endocrinology
1
log6-1102.
8.
Goldenberg, Endocrinology
9.
Louvet,
10.
Hillier, 100,
11.
Lucky, Ross,
R.K., 90, J.P.
and
S.G., 1539-1549. A.W., G.T.
Vaitukaitis, 1492-1498.
J.L.,
Vaitukaitis, Knazek,
Schreiber, (1977)
and
J.L. R.A.,
and
J.R., Endocrinology
(1976)
G.T.
Endocrinology
Ross,
G.T.
100,
S.G., 128-133.
Hillier,
1221
Ross,
(1977)
Schulman,
(1972).
99:
758-764.
Endocrinology
J.D.,
and