LK\‘IKOY\IFN’IAI. RESLARCH14, 113 - 137 t 1977)

Intensity

Patterns

of Solar Ultraviolet

JOSEPH SCO,I.TO AND THOMAS

Received

August

Radiation

R. FEARS

24, 1976

Using field measurements of ultraviolet radiation. intensity patterns by time of day and time of year are examined. Depending on location. 39 to 80% of the half-hourly readings of sufficient intensity to produce minimum erythema occur between 10:00 ..I>$ and 1:OO F’XI during the late spring and early summer months of May through August. Most people, particularly those in Northern latitudes. can substantially reduce their exposure to erythema-producing ultraviolet radiation by avoiding sunlight during the noon-day hours. Individuals of light-skin pigmentation. i.e.. those who should limit their sunlight exposure. will find this work helpful.

INTRODUCTION

Each day the surface of the earth is exposed to the ultraviolet radiation (UV) of sunlight. Although living things have adapted and indeed are not completely dependent on sunlight, many of its effects are deleterious. Exposure to UV may produce various diseases of the skin and eye in man, such as inflammation, blistering, photokeratitis, cataracts, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and malignant melanoma. In an earlier paper (Scotto et al., 1976) we studied field measurements from ultraviolet meters by quantifying, in relative terms, ultraviolet insolation. However, total cumulative ultraviolet exposure may not be the most appropriate dose metameter for this agent. Rook and co-workers (1975) state, “The reaction of the skin to different dose-rates and different intervals between doses of ultraviolet light, e.g. frequent lower dose-rates as might be experienced by outdoor workers compared with less frequent higher dose-rates from week-end radiation, has not been established in man.” Indeed, it has been suggested (Hsu et al., 1975) that initiation of tumor cells may result from short, intense exposures. In this paper we examine the field measurements of ultraviolet radiation in order to quantify ultraviolet intensity patterns by time of day and time of year. As in the earlier work our purpose is to provide guidelines for those individuals who need to limit their sunlight exposure. MATERIALS

AND METHODS

In a cooperative effort of the Department of Transportation, Temple University, the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, and the National Cancer Institute, ultraviolet meters were placed at weather stations in nine continental locations.’ The locations were selected to represent a wide range of latitudes. The meters were designed by Donald F. Robertson (1969, 1972) so that after each half-hour each meter records a count which is proportional to the erythema (sunI Ft. Worth. Texas: Des Moines. Florida: El Paso. Texas: Albuquerque, Dakota.

Iowa: Minneapolis. Minnesota; New Mexico: Philadelphia.

113 Copyright 411

npht\

‘i

1977

OS reproduction

hy

Academic m any

Press.

Inc.

form

reserved.

Oakland, California; Tallahassee. Pennsylvania: and Bismarck. North

114

SCOTT0

AND

FEARS

burning) effectiveness of the ultraviolet B (in the broad wavelength band 280-320 nm) that has passed through its filters and photosensors. A count of four-hundred during a single half-hour is said to be sufficient to produce “minimal erythema,” i.e., slight redness, in untanned Caucasian skin. This level ofintensity will therefore be used as an intensity index. Since the action spectrum for skin erythema is usually taken to be the same or similar to that for skin cancer, measurements from these instruments have wide applicability and are therefore particularly well suited for the purpose of this study. Data for the entire calendar year 1974 were submitted to the National Cancer Institute for processing and analysis (Scotto ef nl., 1975). Monthly averages for each half-hourly time slot were used as estimates for missing recordings. All diurnal recordings relate to local standard time. RESULTS

In order to describe intensity patterns of UV radiation conveniently, six values were arbitrarily chosen: 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600. The number of days during which at least one half-hour UV count reaches the specified intensity at each location is provided in Table 1. Not unexpectedly, intensity values are more frequently exceeded at stations which are closer to the equator (low latitude), closer to the sun (high altitude), and which have clearer skies. Intensity values greater than 200 are frequently exceeded during the late spring and early summer (June through August), as shown in Table 2. When the northern hemisphere is tilted from the sun (November through January) high-intensity values occur infrequently. Table 3 shows the distribution of occasions during the year for which values of 200, 400, and 600 were exceeded, by time of day for each location. Intensity recordings of 400 or more occur most frequently during the noon time period; 93% of the recordings above 400 in Philadelphia were observed between 10:00 AM and 2:00 PM and 74% of the half-hourly readings above 400 occurred during the same time interval in El Paso.

N~t.~sw.

Station Tallahassee El Paso Ft. Worth Albuquerque Oakland Philadelphia Des Moines Minneapolis Bismarck

Latitude 30.4" 31.8"

32.8” 35.1" 37.7 39.9 4l.Y

44.9” 46.8"

TABLE I OF DAYS DURI~‘C, 1974 wrr~ AT LEASI. ONE HAI.F-HOUR IXAI‘ RF.ACHED SPECIFILD INTENSITY

Altitude

(ft) 5s

3918 537 5311 6

5 938 834 1647

Average daily sky cover in tenths: sunrise-sunset 5.67 3.96 5.23 4.57 4.54 6.28 6.05 6.37 6.25

COUNT

lntensity 600

value

500

400

300

200

100

0

79

153

203

279

338

359

365

173 82 131

215

255

134 180

171 219

312 233 257

352 293 320

361 343 360

365 365 365

61 14 4

133 60 94 64 71

170 117 180

210

262 222

339 299 299 264 259

365 365 365 365 365

18 22

III 118

167 171 147 154

221 196 192

INTENSITY

PATTERNS

OF SOLAR

UV

RADIATION

113

000000000

000000000

occlooooooo

ocooooooo

or-10000000

Total

16:30 17:oo

OS:00 OS:30 09:oo 09:30 IO:00 IO:30 I l:oo 11:30 12:oo 12:30 13:OQ 13:30 14:oo 14:30 15:oo 15:30

Intensity

I ialue

Time

200

‘2 II2 176 220 257 294 330 345 344 341 342 326 304 ‘69 236 100 134 61 0

4313

3507

El Paso

9; 145 199 741 266 281 308 307 304 308 290 255 205 166 106 31 0 0

Tallahassee

Fort

3170

65 122 163 201 ‘32 254 268 272 273 262 252 22s 202 151 131 93 4 0

0

Worth

3627

3 91 156 187 225 252 274 287 302 311 297 277 24.5 231 192 149 100 42 0

Albuquerque

2842

68 100 151 180 204 229 237 242 241 226 219 205 180 IS9 128 46 0

27

0

Oakland

Station

2139

38 85 119 147 169 182 184 190 193 185 I72 162 133 100 69 21 0 0

0

Philadelphia

2339

0 37 66 I02 134 I58 171 186 185 193 197 I88 174 164 134 112 91 45 2

Des Moines

0

1980

51 100 126 138 151 158 167 169 163 158 144 I38 119 96 57 23 0

'2

Minneapolis

2097

149 141 123 104 69 38 0

Bismarck

TCd

l5:30 16:OO

14:oo 14:30 15:oo

12:oo I?:30 13:oo l3:30

lo:00 IO:30 II:00 I I:30

09: 30

09:oo

itensity

,,

value

400

,,,,

I?‘9

0 0 1332

162 123 52 0

214 194

167 164 I58

132 99 47 6

I89 210 ‘31 1,35 235 227

83

112

IS1

1347

0 0

175 95 44

153 152 154 I39

135 145

0 10

13 95

161

92 IZI I61

0 21

,.

1834

IX 68 17 0

I89 174 149

197 198 100

I55 182

*

0 59 I?4

1369

3 0

146 I-15 64

IS3 I58 164 I63

38 89 I I9 146

I 0

6%

0 0

38 I4

98 86 82 61

1-7 52 79 88

0 2

936

104 91 75 46

108 109 109

40 65 83 104

0 0

(8

66’

0 0

,,,

‘0

33 36

92 89 79 71

47 66 83

0 0 21

36 0 0

95

100

83 91

61 78

.

< a .b 0

C

s

;j m z a

Total

Intensity 1o:oo IO:30 II:00 11:30 12:oo 12:30 13:oo 13:30 14:oo 14:30 15:oo 15:30 l6:OO

value

Time

600

213

0 2 21 43 49 52 32 13 I 0 0 0 0

Tallahassee

1085

10 87 128 144 157 154 147 131 88 39 0 0 0

El Paso

Fort

301

3 16 60 68 76 58 18 1 0 0 0 0

Worth

703

0 16 86 116 120 122 108 80 52 3 0 0 0

Station

31

214

0 0

0 0 I 5 12 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Philadelphia

0 0 4 27 44 56 49 32 0 I

Oakland

3 (Cor~tinuc~I)

Albuquerque

TABLE

134

0 0 0 18 32 35 31 I6

Des Moines

35

0 0 0 0 8 16 8 3 0 0 0 0 0

Minneapolis

;i z 2 E

I4 20 15 2 0

54

s

3

R

0 0 0

Bismarck

INTENSITY

PATTERKS

OF

SOL,AR

LW

RhDIAl-ION

119

The interrelationship of intensity with location, season, and hour of day is given in Table 4, which provides the relative number of half-hour periods with counts exceeding 200, 400. and 600 for specified time intervals in each month at each location. During the spring and summer months (April through September), 28.5 to 56.4% of all the counts above 400 were received at each location during the noon time interval 1l:OO ASPto 1:OO PM. DISCUSSION

In all locations, intensities capable of producing erythema are found most frequently during the midday hours of the spring and early summer, but in northern latitudes this concentration of high-intensity recordings is quite remarkable. For example, in Bismarck 96.3% of all the recorded counts above 600 were observed between 1I:00 AM and 1:00 PM during June and July. In contrast in El Paso. at a much lower latitude 20.6% of all counts above 600 were observed during this period. This suggests that individuals (particularly those in northern latitudes) might easily reduce their exposure to higher intensities of short-wavelength ultraviolet radiation by avoiding the midday sun during just a few months. Using the tables presented here, one can consider quantitatively exposure to periods of high-intensity, short-wavelength ultraviolet radiation as well as evaluate plans for avoiding sunlight. Consider two hypothetical individuals. The first, a professional, is indoors on weekdays until 5:00 PM and outdoors during the other daylight hours. On weekends and during July, when he vacations, he is also outside from 1O:OO AM until 2:00 PM. The second individual is an auto mechanic. He is sheltered about 50% of the time during working hours, 7:00 AM--I 1:30 AM and 12:30 r+5:00 PM. and outside during lunch time, six days a week. Table 5 provides for each location the relative reduction in length of exposure to intensities exceeding 400 counts per half-hour that each individual can achieve by avoiding sunlight during one-hour and two-hour periods around noontime each day for 2, 4, and 12 months. By avoiding just one noon-time hour for 4 months. reduction in total exposure of from 16.7 to 35.7% is achieved by each individual. Reductions achieved by avoiding sunlight during two noon-time hours are surprisingly large, ranging from 23% for 2 months in El Paso to 58% in Des Moines for the whole year. In general, an avoidance scheme appears to be more effective at higher latitudes. For example, by avoiding sunlight for 1 hour in Bismarck the professional reduces exposure by 20% compared to 13% in Tallahassee. CONCLUSION

These data show that by using a simple plan of avoiding sunlight around noontime, an individual can drastically reduce his exposure to short periods of highintensity ultraviolet radiation.

120

SCOTT0

AND

FEARS

?‘c)r-? - r-i m *

--r-h - Pi ri ri

2 z +L?:8RI . ymmmv ~-i--i-;-i---3 m. 0 c, 0 -00 r,?‘---

INTENSITY

0000 6 d

c’

6

PATTERNS

d

o--o ri b’ ti

0.0 cddd

UV

0000 6666

~:3000* Cdid

6

SOLAR

0000 dddd

a--.ri -4 \d od

0000 d d

OF

0

3

&

121

RADIATION

ococ 6666

22

SCOTT0

9099 cd00

AND

FEARS

9993 0006

0000 ddo’i

--mm b’&iv;

90000’ 9 c. 0

0000 dddd

9900 0066

coo0 dddd

-0 4

w-i rnr-‘drn

c-1 0 od ri--

rti

Ici 9 --

CO*-M riti3dod

0000 d 6 c’ c:

*r-c+ ri i

r- od

qooo Odd6

go000 x ” 0 CTi 0 e,crmm* b-.-m.I I I I o--.-w ~momo &‘“OOM&MC

9900 0066

oo-6 6

c. 9 9-0 0006

0000 dddd

0’

c’

INTENSITY

PATl‘EKNS

OF

cz35 jssj

c. c1 c. c. ccc0

c--cn i od ri --

i

occc d c’

-1 I z---.rn=mo 52 ----i’s m---0

LIV

5355 cccs

cccc s’ r,

123

KAI)I.4’I’ION

CC3D ii&i

s’

c’

v:

c--d

SOLAR

c’

i

cc33 o666

i

c’

COGfo c’ i

I

I

occc c’dbs’

6

i

?CC? cocc

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Paso, Texas 11:31-12:30 11:01-13:oo 10:31-13:30 IO:01 -14:oo

Fort Worth Texas 11:31-12:30 ll:Ol-13:oo 10:31-13:30 1O:Ol - 14:oo

Albuquerque, New 11:31-12:30 11:01~13:00 10:31-13:30 lO:Ol- 14:OO

Mexico

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Florida

Tallahassee, 11:31-12:30 ll:Ol-13:oo 10:31-13:30 lO:Ol-14:oo

January

PERECENT

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

February

OF COUNTS

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1.1 1.7 1.9 1.9

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

March

ABOVE

600

2.3 3.7 3.7 3.7

1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3

4.2 8.5 11.9 12.9

10.8 16.0 16.0 16.0

April

4c

7.0 14.1 19.8 21.2

11.6 21.9 27.2 28.2

5.3 10.5 15.2 18.9

10.8 21.1 29.1 29.1

May

7.7 15.5 22.5 26.6

18.9 37.5 39.2 39.5

5.5 11.1 16.6 21.8

11.3 20.2 25.4 26.3

June

SPECIFIED

TABLE WITHIN

8.4 16.2 23.0 26.2

9.6 16.6 20.3 20.3

4.8 9.5 13.7 17.3

7.0 12.2 14.6 15.0

6.4 12.4 16.2 17.2

6.3 9.6 10.3 10.3

3.9 7.8 11.5 14.2

5.2 9.4 9.9 9.9

FOR

2.7 4.7 4.7 4.7

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

3.4 5.9 7.9 7.9

2.3 3.8 3.8 3.8

September

BY MONTH

August

PERIOD Mnnth

July

TIML

1974

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

October

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

November

5

2

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

E

2

0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

B c:

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

December

INTENSITY

PATTERNS

OF

SOLAR

UV

125

RADIATION

9999 0000

0000 dddc’

99=c1 0060

0000 6666

0000 6666

9909 0060

qooo Odd6

9900 oodd

0000 dc’dd

coot c’ d d c’

9900 OOdti

0000 6666

9999 0000

0000 ddc’c:

9900 oodd

9900 0066

0000 dddc:

9 c, OCdc’

0000 6666

ooco 6666

0000 dddd

9

0

0

coo0 cddd

0000 dddd

9909 0060

coo0 dddd

qqoo OOdd

0000 d 6

0

0

9

0

9

qqoo oojd

9009 cddo

9909 0060

0060

0000 6666

6

d

Z:848 . . . . ~Arnrn~ .ZA‘“T-7 I -Mm E: ”--00 0 ?-!0 m-e-x

0000 dddd

9930 0066

0000 dddd

9 9 0060

0000 dddd

9900 0056

0000 dddd

9900 0066

AhI-I:00

PSI

ASI-I:00

June-July May-August January-December

II:00

PM

Mechanic II:30 Axf-12:30 PM June-July May-August January-December

June-July May-August January-December

I I:00

Professional I I:30 AFT- I?:30 r?,I June- July May-August January-December

12.6

25.0 49.9

17.5

32.7 59.1

21.8 39.9

8.5 16.8 33.6

33.0 53.3

11.8

23.0

36.4 54.7

38.0 55.1

20.5

13.9 15.3 37.0

41.6 52.7

30. I

15.0 10.6 26.5

TABLE

30.2 52.9

15.7

10.5 20.2 35.7

26.2 36.8 53.3

18.6 27.1

13.2

Albuquerque

IS H-\LP-HOURLY SPKIFIED Trw

Worth

16.7 26.9

Fort

11.6

El Paso

75.7

27.9

13.1 1x.4

Tallahassee

A\,o~r)~uc;

REDU~TIOPI’ SL~NLIGH,I DVRINC:

PERCEST

39.6 55.5

20.0

13.x 26.4 37.0

30.2 43.1 53.8

'1.7 27.0

15.2

Oakland

53.0 66.3

28.6

18.7 35.7 45.3

38.7 s1.5 5X.3

26.0 29.8

19. I

Philadelphia

COUNTS EXCEEDISG 400 PFRI~DS AT EACH OF NINL

5

26.7 43.5 56.0

28.8 37.5

17.7

36.5 46.3 53.5

31.9

50.6 57.1

51.9 62.1

34.0 39.0

21.1

39.4 49.7 53.1

3.0 27.1

19.6

Bismarck

30.8

34.9 42.9

20.6

39.4 50.8 55.x

19.7 15.6 28.8

18.2

Minneapolis

23.0 26.9

Des Moines

LOCA.I.IONS

~1

2

7" 6

2

K 2

INTENSITY

PATTERNS

OF

SOLAR

UV

RADIATION

127

REFERENCES Hsu. J., Forbes, P. D., Harber, L. G., and La Kow, E. (1975). Introduction of skin tumors in hairless mice by a single exposure to UV radiation. Photockem. Photobiol. 21, 185-188. Robertson, D. F. (1969). “Long-Term Field Measurements of Erythemally Effective Natural Ultraviolet Radiation in The Biologic Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation.” Pergamon. New York. Robertson, D. F. (1972). “Solar Ultraviolet Radiation in Relation to Human Sunburn and Skin Cancer.” Thesis submitted to the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Rook, A., Wilkinson, D. S.. and Ebling, F. T. G. (1975).Zn “Textbookof Dermatology.” Znded, Vol. 2, pp. 1914-15. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Oxford London Edinburgh Melbourne. Scotto, J., Fears, T. R., and Gori, G. B. (1975). “Measurements of Ultraviolet Radiation in the United States and Comparisons with Skin Cancer Data.” DHEW No. (NIH) 761029. National Cancer Institute, Div. of Cancer Cause and Prevention. Scotto. J., Fears. T. R., and Gori. G. B. (1976). Ultraviolet exposure patterns. Environ. Res. 12, 22%237.

Intensity patterns of solar ultraviolet radiation.

LK\‘IKOY\IFN’IAI. RESLARCH14, 113 - 137 t 1977) Intensity Patterns of Solar Ultraviolet JOSEPH SCO,I.TO AND THOMAS Received August Radiation R...
577KB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views