EXTRA VIEW Nucleus 6:6, 449--454; November/December 2015; © 2015 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Insights into the Initiation of Eukaryotic DNA Replication Irina Bruck, Patricia Perez-Arnaiz, Max K Colbert, and Daniel L Kaplan* Department of Biomedical Science; Florida State University College of Medicine; Tallahassee, FL USA
T
Keywords: cancer, DNA replication, eukaryotic, helicase, initiation
he initiation of DNA replication is a highly regulated event in eukaryotic cells to ensure that the entire genome is copied once and only once during S phase. The primary target of cellular regulation of eukaryotic DNA replication initiation is the assembly and activation of the replication fork helicase, the 11-subunit assembly that unwinds DNA at a replication fork. The replication fork helicase, called CMG for Cdc45-Mcm2–7, and GINS, assembles in S phase from the constituent Cdc45, Mcm2–7, and GINS proteins. The assembly and activation of the CMG replication fork helicase during S phase is governed by 2 S-phase specific kinases, CDK and DDK. CDK stimulates the interaction between Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11, 3 initiation factors that are each required for the initiation of DNA replication. DDK, on the other hand, phosphorylates the Mcm2, Mcm4, and Mcm6 subunits of the Mcm2–7 complex. Sld3 recruits Cdc45 to Mcm2–7 in a manner that depends on DDK, and recent work suggests that Sld3 binds directly to Mcm2–7 and also to single-stranded DNA. Furthermore, recent work demonstrates that Sld3 and its human homolog Treslin substantially stimulate DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2. These data suggest that the initiation factor Sld3/ Treslin coordinates the assembly and activation of the eukaryotic replication fork helicase by recruiting Cdc45 to Mcm2–7, stimulating DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2, and binding directly to singlestranded DNA as the origin is melted.
*Correspondence to: Daniel L Kaplan; Email: Daniel. [email protected] Submitted: 10/05/2015 Revised: 10/23/2015 Accepted: 10/28/2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19491034.2015.1115938 www.tandfonline.com
Introduction to DNA Replication and the Cell Cycle DNA replication is restricted to the S phase of the eukaryotic cell cycle.1 During Nucleus
S phase, the parental genomic DNA is replicated precisely once to provide an additional copy of DNA for each daughter cell.1 It is important that replication is restricted to S phase, and that the parental is only duplicated just once.2 Over-replication of DNA, under-replication of DNA, or replication of DNA outside of S phase can lead to genome instability and possibly cell death or cancer.2 The core enzymes of DNA replication are the DNA polymerases, which copy the parental duplex DNA.3 Pol a-primase supplies the initial nucleic acid primer for subsequent elongation by Pol d and Pol e .3 Pol e is devoted to replication on the leading strand, while Pol d is devoted to replication on the lagging strand,4 although recently this division of labor has been questioned.5 Importantly, Pol a-primase, Pol d, and Pol e each require singlestranded DNA templates (primed for Pol d and Pol e, or unprimed for Pol a-primase) for activity. Since the parental duplex is double-stranded, the replication fork helicase is required to melt the parental duplex to form single DNA strands (ssDNA).6 The replication fork helicase therefore functions before the replicative polymerases, and therefore the replication fork helicase is the physiologic target for cell cycle regulation.6
The Replication Fork Helicase is CMG The replication fork helicase is an 11subunit enzyme called CMG, composed of Cdc45 (Cell-division cycle 45], Mcm2–7 (Minichromosome maintenance, a heterohexamer of Mcm2, Mcm3, Mcm4, Mcm5, Mcm6, and Mcm7), and GINS (Japanese for Go, Ichi, Nii, Sans, or 5,1,2,3, or Sld5 [synthetic lethal with 449
dpb11-1 (DNA-polymerase B-interacting protein)], Psf1 (partner with Sld5), Psf2, Psf3).7 The Mcm2–7 heterohexameric ring complex is the motor of the CMG helicase.7,8 The 6 homologous Mcm subunits contain an N-terminal DNA-interacting and oligomerization domain and a C-terminal AAAC motor domain.9 The Mcm2–7 complex has very weak helicase and ATPase activity on its own, but the assembly with Cdc45 and the tetrameric GINS complex stimulates Mcm2–7 activity.7 Together, the CMG is very efficient in hydrolyzing ATP and processively unwinding DNA.7 The Mcm2–7 complex loads as an inactive head to head double hexamer to encircle double-stranded DNA during G1 phase in a reaction known as replication licensing.10,11 This reaction is ATPdependent and catalyzed by Orc, Cdc6, and Cdt1.10,11 The details of this reaction have recently been elucidated by a number of labs.12-14 This reaction is restricted to G1 phase in the cell cycle.15 Since Mcm27 complexes cannot load during S phase, this restriction of Mcm2–7 loading to G1 phase prevents re-replication or over-replication of the parental duplex DNA.15 An excess of Mcm2–7 complexes load onto double-stranded DNA relative to the Mcm2–7 complexes that are activated to unwind DNA at a replication fork.16 This was known as the Mcm paradox, since it was initially unclear why an excess of dormant Mcm2–7 complexes are loaded to encircle double-stranded DNA.16 Later it was discovered that the excess Mcm2–7 complexes are loaded as a “back-up” mechanism if cells are subjected to replication stress.16 This is important because it ensures that there is a sufficient number of loaded Mcm2–7 complexes before S phase begins, which is when licensing becomes inhibited. If cells encounter replication stress, additional loaded Mcm2–7 complexes are activated to help accomplish the complete replication of the genomic DNA.16 This “back-up” mechanism helps ensure that once DNA replication starts, DNA replication will eventually be completed to avoid genome instability.16 Dormant origins have also been shown to be an active tumor suppressor mechanism.17 Although the Mcm2–7 complex loads to encircle double-stranded DNA during
450
G1, the Mcm2–7 complex assembles with Cdc45 and GINS to form the CMG helicase during S phase.7,18-20 Thus, assembly of the CMG from Cdc45, Mcm2–7, and GINS is a critical S phase regulatory mechanism that restricts DNA replication to S phase.7,18-20 Furthermore, whereas there is an excess of loaded Mcm2–7 complexes relative to Mcm2–7 complexes that are subsequently activated, there is no evidence that fully assembled CMGs are present in excess.19,20 Thus, the assembly of Cdc45 and GINS with Mcm2–7 completes the assembly of the active helicase and marks the particular Mcm2–7 complex for activation and unwinding.7,18-21
Role of CDK and DDK in Helicase Assembly and Activation The assembly of the CMG can only occur during S phase because this step is regulated by 2 S-phase kinases, S-CDK (S-phase cyclin-dependent kinase) and DDK (Dbf4-dependent kinase).6 Moreover, CMG complex formation is also regulated in budding yeast by 4 initiationspecific protein factors, Sld2 (RecQL4 or RecQ4 in humans), Sld3 (Treslin or TICRR in humans), Sld7, and Dpb11 (TopBP1 in humans).6 These factors do not travel as part of the CMG active helicase.22 S-CDK plays also an important role in inhibiting the Mcm2–7 loading reaction during S phase, allowing licensing to take place only during G1.15 However, in addition, S-CDK phosphorylates Sld2 and Sld3 to trigger complex formation with Dpb11.23,24 This reaction is conserved from yeast to humans.25-28 Furthermore, Sld3 and Sld7 form a tetramer containing 2 subunits of Sld3 and 2 subunits of Sld7 in solution.29 Sld2, Sld3, Dpb11, and Dbf4 subunit of DDK are limiting during S phase, and overexpression of these factors causes late origins to fire early.30 Sld3 is also a target of the replication checkpoint, which functions to silence late origins during replication stress.31 The role of DDK during S phase is to phosphorylate subunits of the Mcm2–7 complex.32,33 The Mcm2, Mcm4, and Mcm6 subunits are phosphorylated by DDK during S phase.34,35
Nucleus
Phosphorylation of Mcm4 by DDK is important for the recruitment of Cdc45 to Mcm2–7.35-37 Furthermore, phosphorylation of Mcm4 by DDK alleviates an inhibitor activity present in the N-terminal region of Mcm4.38 The role of DDK phosphorylation of Mcm6 is currently under investigation.35 The role of DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 has been less clear and controversial. While some studies, including papers from our group, have suggested that DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is required for DNA replication under normal growth conditions,39,40 other studies have suggested that DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is only important during replication stress.41 Our studies suggesting that DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is required for cell growth under normal conditions used a galactose-inducible promoter, wherein galactose levels were varied to achieve wild-type levels of Mcm2 expression under normal conditions.42 Under these conditions, expression of kinase-dead Mcm2 (Mcm2-S164A, S170A) is lethal to these cells, and overexpression of kinase dead Mcm2 results in a dominant negative severe growth defect.42 The studies that conclude that DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is only important during replication stress were based upon a genomic insertion of the kinasedead mutant of mcm2 at the genomic locus, under regulation by native promoter.41 We recently acquired the yeast strain that harbored the genomic insertion of the kinase-dead mutant of mcm2.43 We overexpressed the kinasedead mutant of mcm2 in the wild-type yeast strain and in the yeast strain harboring the kinase dead mutant.43 Whereas overexpression of the kinase-dead mutant of mcm2 in wild-type cells results in a severe growth defect, overexpression of the same kinase dead mutant of mcm2 resulted in no defect in the cells harboring the genomic copy of kinase-dead mcm2.43 These data suggest that the strain with the genomic copy of kinasedead mcm2 harbored a suppressor mutation.43 Thus, this suppressor mutation explains the discrepancy between the conclusions from our different laboratories, and the data now point to the conclusion that DDK phosphorylation of
Volume 6 Issue 6
Mcm2 is required for DNA replication under normal growth conditions.39,42,43 The interaction between Mcm2 and Mcm5 in the Mcm2–7 ring may dissociate under certain conditions, acting as a ‘gate’ for the movement of dsDNA into the Mcm2–7 ring during G1.8,44 Work from our laboratory showed how DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 may have a critical role in modulating this gate. The phosphorylation of the N-terminal of Mcm2 by DDK may open the Mcm2–7 ring at the Mcm2-Mcm5 interface, allowing for ssDNA extrusion.42 The generation of ssDNA at origins of replication is critical for the timely assembly of the CMG helicase.42 Furthermore, expression of mcm5-bob1 (mcm5-P83L) bypasses the requirement for DDK in the cell,45 and expression of mcm5-bob1 also partially suppresses the growth inhibition induced by overexpression of kinase-dead mutant of mcm2.42 Mcm5-bob1 is also inhibited from binding Mcm2 relative to wild-type Mcm5, suggesting that the Mcm2-Mcm5 interface is a target of regulation by DDK.42
Roles of Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 in Helicase Assembly and Activation The roles of the essential initiation factors, Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11, are beginning to be elucidated. For example, recent structural data shows that the N-terminal region of Sld3 binds to Sld7, and Sld3 and Sld7 from a tetramer of 2 subunits each of Sld3 and Sld7 (Fig. 1).29 Furthermore, the middle domain of Sld3 binds to Cdc45, and structural data on this interaction is available as well.46 Moreover, Sld3 recruits Cdc45 to Mcm2–7 during S phase in a manner that is dependent on DDK.32,47 Dpb11 is believed to be a scaffolding protein that attaches to CDKphosphorylated Sld2 and Sld3.23,24 Each of these proteins, Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11, bind directly to Mcm2-7 and singlestranded DNA (ssDNA).48-50 These data suggest that Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 may play an active role in assembly or activation of the helicase.48-50 Furthermore, the ssDNA-binding properties of Sld2 and Sld3 are conserved in their human counterparts, RecQL4 and Treslin,
www.tandfonline.com
respectively.50,51 In addition, the region of Sld3 that binds to ssDNA and Mcm3 and Mcm5 subunits is the C-terminal domain of Sld3.50 What could be the functional role of Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 binding to ssDNA? Work from other labs suggests that single-stranded DNA is formed at an origin of replication during the process of replication initiation, in a process known as origin melting.52 Furthermore, in one model of replication elongation, the steric exclusion model, the lagging singlestranded DNA template is excluded from the central channel of the CMG replication fork helicase.53 Other models for replication fork helicase mechanism involve a ploughshare at the back of the helicase,54 or an exit channel for single-stranded DNA extrusion through the CMG.55 While details regarding CMG mechanism remain to be resolved, one theme in each of the models is for the separation of the 2 single DNA strands during helicase activation. Thus, during replication initiation, an ssDNA-binding platform is potentially generated for Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11. Since the Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 proteins bind to one another in a CDKdependent mechanism 23,24 and since Sld2, Sld3 or Dpb11 alone has considerable affinity for ssDNA,48-50 the Sld2Sld3-Dpb11 complex likely has a very tight affinity for ssDNA. Recent data from our lab suggest that Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 attachment to ssDNA at an origin of replication is required for DNA replication.48-50 In addition, we found that Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 interaction with ssDNA may be important for GINS attachment to Mcm2–7.48-50 This conclusion follows from the observation that Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 compete with GINS for Mcm2–7 in a manner that is influenced by ssDNA addition.48-50 In other words, Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 each interact with Mcm5 and Mcm3, the subunits of Mcm2–7 that contact GINS.48-50 Furthermore, addition of Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 to Mcm2–7 can dislodge GINS from Mcm2–7.48-50 However, single-stranded DNA also competes with Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11, but not GINS, for Mcm3/Mcm5 interaction.48-50 In addition, the addition of singlestranded DNA releases Sld2, Sld3, and
Nucleus
Dpb11 from Mcm3 and Mcm5, allowing GINS to bind to Mcm2–7 by a passive sequestration mechanism.48-50 There is also a recent manuscript from the Speck lab demonstrating that Sld2 and Sld3 exhibit an anti-cooperative mechanism for recruiting Cdc45 to loaded Mcm2–7 complexes.56 In other words, Sld2 and Sld3 release from Mcm2–7 once Cdc45 is recruited to Mcm2–7.56 Further details about the process of origin melting and helicase activation are not yet resolved, but the development of an in vitro replication initiation assay by the Diffley lab holds promise that many of these details will soon be revealed.32 Dbf4, Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 are present in low amounts in the cell.30 Thus, they can only bind to certain Mcm2–7 complexes, marking them for subsequent CMG helicase assembly and activation. But what is to prevent DDK from phosphorylating one Mcm2–7 complex, while Sld3, for example, binds to a different Mcm2–7 complex? A potential answer to this question has recently been revealed by work from our lab.43 DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is a very weak reaction in vitro, and only a fraction of Mcm2 proteins are phosphorylated by DDK in a kinase assay using purified DDK and Mcm2.40 In spite of this weak activity in vitro, we demonstrated an in vivo DNA replication function for DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2.42,43 Thus, the data suggested that a critical factor was missing from our in vitro phosphorylation assay.43,44
Is Sld3/Treslin a Conductor of Helicase Assembly and Activation? We examined Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 for their effect on DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 in vitro, and found that Sld3 exerts an 11-fold stimulation of DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2.43 In contrast, the ability of Sld2 and Dpb11 to stimulate DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is very slight.43 Furthermore, Treslin, the human ortholog of Sld3, stimulates human DDK phosphorylation of human Mcm2 by 15fold.43 Thus, the ability of Sld3/Treslin to substantially stimulate DDK
451
References
Figure 1. The modular domain organization of Sld3 is shown. The N-terminal domain (amino acids 1-115) binds to Sld7. The middle domain (amino acids 148-430) binds to Cdc45. The C-terminal domain (amino acids 511-668) binds to ssDNA, binds to Mcm3/Mcm5, and stimulates DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2.
phosphorylation of Mcm2 is conserved from yeast to human.43 This observation may help explain the question asked above, what keeps Sld3 from binding to one Mcm2–7 complex, while DDK phosphorylates a different Mcm2–7 complex? The answer is surprisingly simple. Sld3/Treslin binds to Mcm2–7 and activates DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 at the same time.43,50 Thus, Sld3/Treslin is a conductor of replication initiation. Sld3/Treslin performs several functions upon binding to Mcm27: 1 Sld3/Treslin recruits Cdc45 to Mcm2–7 in a manner that depends upon DDK,47,2 Sld3/Treslin stimulates DDK phosphorylation of the Mcm2 subunit of the Mcm2–7 complex,43,3 Sld3/Treslin binds to ssDNA once the origin is melted, dissociating from Mcm2–7 and allowing GINS to bind Mcm2–7.50 By performing these 3 biochemical reactions at a given Mcm2–7 complex, Sld3/Treslin coordinates helicase assembly with helicase activation.43,47,50
reports suggest that Mcm10 is involved in the recruitment of Cdc45 to Mcm2–7,6063 while recent reports suggest that Mcm10 is involved in a step following CMG assembly.64-66 These recent reports suggest that Mcm10 plays a role in activating the fully-assembled CMG. It may be that both models are correct; in other words, Mcm10 may have multiple functions in replication initiation. Future work may help resolve this controversy. There are also reports concluding that Mcm10 is a component of the CMG during replication elongation, providing stability to the Pol a-primase.67,68 Thus, Mcm10 is required for initiation, and it is also required for replication elongation.
The Role of Mcm10 in DNA Replication Initiation
Funding
Mcm10 is also required for the initiation of DNA replication.57-59 Some early
452
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Funding was provided by Florida State University and the National Science Foundation, grant number 1265431 to D.L.K.
Nucleus
1. Bell SP, Dutta A. DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Biochem 2002; 71:333-74; PMID:12045100; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev. biochem.71.110601.135425 2. Green B, Finn K, Li J. Loss of DNA replication control is a potent inducer of gene amplification. Science 2010; 329:943-46; PMID:20724634; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1190966 3. Georgescu R, Schauer G, Yao N, Langston L, Yurieva O, Zhang D, Finkelstein J, O’Donnell, M. Reconstitution of a eukaryotic replisome reveals suppression mechanisms that define leading/lagging strand operation. Elife 2015; 4:e04988; PMID:25871847; http:// dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04988 4. Pursell Z, Isoz I, Lundstr€om E, Johansson E, Kunkel T. Yeast DNA polymerase epsilon participates in leadingstrand DNA replication. Science 2007; 317:127-30; PMID:17615360; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.1144067 5. Johnson R, Klassen R, Prakash L, Prakash S. A Major Role of DNA Polymerase d in Replication of Both the Leading and Lagging DNA Strands. Mol Cell 2015; 59:163-75; PMID:26145172; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.038 6. Tognetti S, Riera A, Speck C. Switch on the engine: how the eukaryotic replicative helicase MCM2-7 becomes activated. Chromosoma 2015; 124:13-26; PMID:25308420; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412014-0489-2 7. Ilves I, Petojevic T, Pesavento J, Botchan M. Activation of the MCM2-7 Helicase by Association with Cdc45 and GINS Proteins. Mol Cell 2010; 37:247-58; PMID:20122406; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2009.12.030 8. Bochman M, Schwacha A. The Mcm2-7 complex has in vitro helicase activity. Mol Cell 2008; 31:287-93; PMID:18657510; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2008.05.020 9. Fletcher R, Shen J, Gomez-Llorente Y, Martin CS, Carazo JM, Chen X. Double hexamer disruption and biochemical activities of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum MCM. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:42405-10; PMID:16221679; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M509773200 10. Remus D, Beuron F, Tolun G, Griffith J, Morris E, Diffley J. Concerted loading of Mcm2-7 double hexamers around DNA during DNA replication origin licensing. Cell 2009; 139:719-730; PMID:19896182; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2009.10.015 11. Evrin C, Clarke P, Zech J, Lurz R, Sun J, Uhle S, Li H, Stillman B, Speck C. A double-hexameric MCM2-7 complex is loaded onto origin DNA during licensing of eukaryotic DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:20240-20245; PMID:19910535; http://dx. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911500106 12. Ticau S, Friedman L, Ivica N, Gelles J, Bell S. Singlemolecule studies of origin licensing reveal mechanisms ensuring bidirectional helicase loading. Cell 2015; 161:513-525; PMID:25892223; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.012 13. Frigola J, Remus D, Mehanna A, Diffley J. ATPasedependent quality control of DNA replication origin licensing. Nature 2013; 495:339-343; PMID:23474987; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature11920 14. Fernandez-Cid A, Riera A, Tognetti S, Herrera M, Samel S, Evrin C, Winkler C, Gardenal E, Uhle S, Speck C. An ORC/Cdc6/MCM2-7 Complex Is Formed in a Multistep Reaction to Serve as a Platform for MCM Double-Hexamer Assembly. Mol Cell 2013; 50:577-588; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2013.03.026 15. Diffley J. The many faces of redundancy in DNA replication control. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2010; 75:135-142; PMID:21502406; http://dx.doi. org/10.1101/sqb.2010.75.062
Volume 6 Issue 6
16. Ge X, Jackson D, Blow J. Dormant origins licensed by excess Mcm2-7 are required for human cells to survive replicative stress. Genes Dev 2007; 21:3331-3341; PMID:18079179; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/ gad.457807 17. Kawabata T, Luebben S, Yamaguchi S, Ilves I, Matise I, Buske T, Botchan M, Shima N. Stalled fork rescue via dormant replication origins in unchallenged S phase promotes proper chromosome segregation and tumor suppression. Mol Cell 2011; 41:543-553; PMID:21362550; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2011.02.006 18. Moyer S, Lewis P, Botchan M. Isolation of the Cdc45/ Mcm2-7/GINS (CMG) complex, a candidate for the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:10236-10241; PMID:16798881; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.0602400103 19. Gambus A, Jones RC, Sanchez-Diaz A, Kanemaki M, Deursen FV, Edmondson RD, Labib K. GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:358-366; PMID:16531994; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ ncb1382 20. Pacek M, Tutter A, Kubota Y, Takisawa H, Walter J. Localization of MCM2-7, Cdc45, and GINS to the site of DNA unwinding during eukaryotic DNA replication. Mol Cell 2006; 21:581-587; PMID:16483939; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.030 21. Costa A, Renault L, Swuec P, Petojevic T, Pesavento J, Ilves I, MacLellan-Gibson K, Fleck R, Botchan M, Berger J. DNA binding polarity, dimerization, and ATPase ring remodeling in the CMG helicase of the eukaryotic replisome. Elife 2014; 3 Aug 12:e03273 22. Kanemaki M, Labib K. Distinct roles for Sld3 and GINS during establishment and progression of eukaryotic DNA replication forks. EMBO J 2006; 25:17531763; PMID:16601689; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj. emboj.7601063 23. Zegerman P, Diffley JF. Phosphorylation of Sld2 and Sld3 by cyclin-dependent kinases promotes DNA replication in budding yeast. Nature 2007; 445:281-285; PMID:17167417; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature05432 24. Tanaka S, Umemori T, Hirai K, Muramatsu S, Kamimura Y, Araki H. CDK-dependent phosphorylation of Sld2 and Sld3 initiates DNA replication in budding yeast. Nature 2007; 445:328-332; PMID:17167415; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05465 25. Kumagai A, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Dunphy W. Treslin collaborates with TopBP1 in triggering the initiation of DNA replication. Cell 2010; 140:349-359; PMID:20116089; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2009.12.049 26. Kumagai A, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Dunphy W. Direct regulation of Treslin by cyclin-dependent kinase is essential for the onset of DNA replication. J Cell Biol 2011; 193:995-1007; PMID:21646402; http://dx.doi. org/10.1083/jcb.201102003 27. Matsuno K, Kumano M, Kubota Y, Hashimoto Y, Takisawa H. The N-terminal noncatalytic region of Xenopus RecQ4 is required for chromatin binding of DNA polymerase a in the initiation of DNA replication. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:4843-4852; PMID:16782873; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ MCB.02267-05 28. Boos D, Sanchez-Pulido L, Rappas M, Pearl L, Oliver A, Ponting C, Diffley J. Regulation of DNA Replication through Sld3-Dpb11 Interaction Is Conserved from Yeast to Humans. Curr Biol 2011; 21:1152-1157; PMID:21700459; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cub.2011.05.057 29. Itou H, Shirakihara Y, Araki H. The quaternary structure of the eukaryotic DNA replication proteins Sld7 and Sld3. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2015; 71:1649-1656; PMID:26249346; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1107/S1399004715010457
www.tandfonline.com
30. Mantiero D, Mackenzie A, Donaldson A, Zegerman P. Limiting replication initiation factors execute the temporal programme of origin firing in budding yeast. EMBO J 2011; 30:4805-4814; PMID:22081107; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.404 31. Zegerman P, Diffley JFX. DNA replication as a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8:1077-1088; PMID:19505853; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.023 32. Yeeles J, Deegan T, Janska A, Early A, Diffley J. Regulated eukaryotic DNA replication origin firing with purified proteins. Nature 2015; 519:431-435; PMID:25739503; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature14285 33. Labib K. How do Cdc7 and cyclin-dependent kinases trigger the initiation of chromosome replication in eukaryotic cells?s Genes Dev 2010; 24:1208-1219; PMID:20551170; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/ gad.1933010 34. Randell J, Fan A, Chan C, Francis L, Heller R, Galani K, Bell S. Mec1 is one of multiple kinases that prime the Mcm2-7 helicase for phosphorylation by Cdc7. Mol Cell 2010; 40:353-363; PMID:21070963; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.10.017 35. Masai H, Taniyama C, Ogino K, Matsui E, Kakusho N, Matsumoto S, Kim J, Ishii A, Tanaka T, Kobayashi T, et al. Phosphorylation of MCM4 by Cdc7 kinase facilitates its interaction with Cdc45 on the chromatin. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:39249-39261; PMID:17046832; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M608935200 36. Sheu YJ, Stillman B. Cdc7-Dbf4 phosphorylates MCM proteins via a docing site-mediated mechanism to promote S phase progression. Mol Cell 2006; 24:101-113; PMID:17018296; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2006.07.033 37. Sheu Y, Kinney J, Lengronne A, Pasero P, Stillman B. Domain within the helicase subunit Mcm4 integrates multiple kinase signals to control DNA replication initiation and fork progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:E1899-1908; PMID:24740181; http://dx. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404063111 38. Sheu Y, Stillman B. The Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase promotes S phase by alleviating an inhibitory activity in Mcm4. Nature 2010; 463:113-117; PMID:20054399; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08647 39. Lei M, Kawasaki Y, Young M, Kihara M, Sugino A, Tye B. MCM2 is a target of regulation by Cdc7-Dbf4 during the initiation of DNA synthesis. Genes Dev 1997; 11:3365-3374; PMID:9407029; http://dx.doi. org/10.1101/gad.11.24.3365 40. Bruck I, Kaplan D. Dbf4-Cdc7 phosphorylation of Mcm2 is required for cell growth. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:28823-28831; PMID:19692334; http://dx.doi. org/10.1074/jbc.M109.039123 41. Stead B, Brandl C, Davey M. Phosphorylation of Mcm2 modulates Mcm2-7 activity and affects the cell’s response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:6998-7008; PMID:21596784; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/nar/gkr371 42. Bruck I, Kaplan DL. The Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase promotes Mcm2-7 ring opening to allow for single-stranded DNA extrusion and helicase assembly. J Biol Chem 2015; 290:1210-1221; PMID:25471369; http://dx. doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.608232 43. Bruck I, Kaplan D. Conserved mechanism for coordinating replication fork helicase assembly with phosphorylation of the helicase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112:11223-11228; PMID:26305950; http://dx. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509608112 44. Samel S, Fernandez-Cid A, Sun J, Riera A, Tognetti S, Herrera M, Li H, Speck C. A unique DNA entry gate serves for regulated loading of the eukaryotic replicative helicase MCM2-7 onto DNA. Genes Dev 2014; 28:1653-1666; PMID:25085418; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/gad.242404.114 45. Hardy CFJ, Dryga O, Seematter S, Pahl PMB, Sclafani RA. mcm5/cdc46-bob1 bypasses the requirement for
Nucleus
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
the S phase activatorCdc7p. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94:3151-3155; PMID:9096361; http://dx.doi. org/10.1073/pnas.94.7.3151 Itou H, Muramatsu S, Shirakihara Y, Araki H. Crystal structure of the homology domain of the eukaryotic DNA replication proteins Sld3 Treslin Structure 2014; 22:1341-1347; PMID:25126958; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.str.2014.07.001 Kamimura Y, Tak YS, Sugino A, Araki H. Sld3, which interacts with Cdc45 (Sld4), functions for chromosomal DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 2001; 20:2097-2107; PMID:11296242; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.8.2097 Dhingra N, Bruck I, Smith S, Ning B, Kaplan D. Dpb11 helps control assembly of the Cdc45-Mcm2-7GINS replication fork helicase. J Biol Chem 2015; 290:7586-7601; PMID:25659432; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M115.640383 Bruck I, Kaplan D. The replication initiation protein sld2 regulates helicase assembly. J Biol Chem 2014; 289:1948-1959; PMID:24307213; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M113.532085 Bruck I, Kaplan DL. The replication initiation protein Sld3/Treslin orchestrates the assembly of the replication fork helicase during S phase. J Biol Chem 2015; 290 (45):27414-24; PMID: 26405041; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M115.688424 Ohlenschl€ager O, Kuhnert A, Schneider A, Haumann S, Bellstedt P, Keller H, Saluz HP, Hortschansky P, H€anel F, Grosse F, et al. The N-terminus of the human RecQL4 helicase is a homeodomain-like DNA interaction motif. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:8309-8324; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks591 Geraghty D, Ding M, Heintz N, Pederson D. Premature structural changes at replication origins in a yeast minichromosome maintenance (MCM) mutant. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:18011-18021; PMID:10751424; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M909787199 Fu Y, Yardimci H, Long D, Ho T, Guainazzi A, Bermudez V, Hurwitz J, van Oijen A, Sch€arer O, Walter J. Selective bypass of a lagging strand roadblock by the eukaryotic replicative DNA helicase. Cell 2011; 146:931-941; PMID:21925316; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.045 Takahashi TS, Wigley DB, Walter JC. Pumps, paradoxes, and ploughshares: mechanism of the Mcm2-7 DNA helicase. Trends Biochem Sci 2005; 30:437-444; PMID:16002295; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. tibs.2005.06.007 Gai D, Chang Y, Chen X. Origin DNA melting and unwinding in DNA replication. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2010; 20:756-762; PMID:20870402; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.sbi.2010.08.009 Herrera, MC, Tognetti, S, Riera, A, Zech, J, Clarke P, Fernandez-Cid A, Speck C. A reconstituted system reveals how activating and inhibitory interactions control DDK dependent assembly of the eukaryotic replicative helicase. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43(21):1023810250; PMID: 26338774; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ nar/gkv881 Solomon N, Wright M, Chang S, Buckley A, Dumas L, Gaber R. Genetic and molecular analysis of DNA43 and DNA52: two new cell-cycle genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1992; 8:273-289; PMID:1514326; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.320080405 Merchant A, Kawasaki Y, Chen Y, Lei M, Tye BK. A lesion in the DNA replication initiation factor Mcm10 induces pausing of elongation forks through chromosomal replication origins in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:3261-3271; PMID:9154825; http://dx.doi. org/10.1128/MCB.17.6.3261 Thu Y, Bielinsky A. Enigmatic rles of Mcm10 in DNA replication. Trends Biochem Sci 2013; 38:184-194; PMID:23332289; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. tibs.2012.12.003 Wohlschlegel J, Dhar S, Prokhorova T, Dutta, A, Walter J. Xenopus Mcm10 binds to origins of DNA replication after Mcm2-7 and stimulates origin binding of
453
Cdc45. Mol Cell 2002; 9:233-240; PMID:11864598; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00456-2 61. Gregan J, Lindner K, Brimage L, Franklin R, Namdar M, Hart E, Aves S, Kearsey S. Fission yeast Cdc23/ Mcm10 functions after pre-replicative complex formation to promote Cdc45 chromatin binding. Mol Biol Cell 2003; 14:3876-3887; PMID:12972571; http://dx. doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E03-02-0090 62. Sawyer S, Cheng I, Chai W, Tye B. Mcm10 and Cdc45 cooperate in origin activation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Biol 2004; 340:195-202; PMID:15201046; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.04.066 63. Im JS, Ki SH, Farina A, Jung DS, Hurwitz J, Leea JK. Assembly of the Cdc45-Mcm2-7-GINS complex in human cells requires the Ctf4/And-1, RecQL4, and
454
Mcm10 proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:15628-15632; PMID:19805216; http://dx.doi. org/10.1073/pnas.0908039106 64. Watase G, Takisawa H, Kanemaki M. Mcm10 plays a role in functioning of the eukaryotic replicative DNA helicase, Cdc45-Mcm-GINS. Curr Biol 2012; 22:343349; PMID:22285032; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cub.2012.01.023 65. van Deursen F, Sengupta S, De Piccoli G, Sanchez-Diaz A, Labib K. Mcm10 associates with the loaded DNA helicase at replication origins and defines a novel step in its activation. EMBO J 2012; 31:2195-2206; PMID:22433841; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.69 66. Kanke M, Kodama Y, Takahashi T, Nakagawa T, Masukata H. Mcm10 plays an essential role in origin
Nucleus
DNA unwinding after loading of the CMG components. EMBO J 2012; 31:2182-2194; PMID:22433840; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ emboj.2012.68 67. Ricke R, Bielinsky A. A conserved Hsp10-like domain in Mcm10 is required to stabilize the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase-a in budding yeast. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:18414-18425; PMID:16675460; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M513551200 68. Ricke RM, Bielinsky AK. Mcm10 regulates the stability and chromatin association of DNA polymerase-a. Mol Cell 2004; 16:173-185; PMID:15494305; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2004.09.017
Volume 6 Issue 6
Insights into the Initiation of Eukaryotic DNA Replication Irina Bruck, Patricia Perez-Arnaiz, Max K Colbert, and Daniel L Kaplan* Department of Biomedical Science; Florida State University College of Medicine; Tallahassee, FL USA
T
Keywords: cancer, DNA replication, eukaryotic, helicase, initiation
he initiation of DNA replication is a highly regulated event in eukaryotic cells to ensure that the entire genome is copied once and only once during S phase. The primary target of cellular regulation of eukaryotic DNA replication initiation is the assembly and activation of the replication fork helicase, the 11-subunit assembly that unwinds DNA at a replication fork. The replication fork helicase, called CMG for Cdc45-Mcm2–7, and GINS, assembles in S phase from the constituent Cdc45, Mcm2–7, and GINS proteins. The assembly and activation of the CMG replication fork helicase during S phase is governed by 2 S-phase specific kinases, CDK and DDK. CDK stimulates the interaction between Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11, 3 initiation factors that are each required for the initiation of DNA replication. DDK, on the other hand, phosphorylates the Mcm2, Mcm4, and Mcm6 subunits of the Mcm2–7 complex. Sld3 recruits Cdc45 to Mcm2–7 in a manner that depends on DDK, and recent work suggests that Sld3 binds directly to Mcm2–7 and also to single-stranded DNA. Furthermore, recent work demonstrates that Sld3 and its human homolog Treslin substantially stimulate DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2. These data suggest that the initiation factor Sld3/ Treslin coordinates the assembly and activation of the eukaryotic replication fork helicase by recruiting Cdc45 to Mcm2–7, stimulating DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2, and binding directly to singlestranded DNA as the origin is melted.
*Correspondence to: Daniel L Kaplan; Email: Daniel. [email protected] Submitted: 10/05/2015 Revised: 10/23/2015 Accepted: 10/28/2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19491034.2015.1115938 www.tandfonline.com
Introduction to DNA Replication and the Cell Cycle DNA replication is restricted to the S phase of the eukaryotic cell cycle.1 During Nucleus
S phase, the parental genomic DNA is replicated precisely once to provide an additional copy of DNA for each daughter cell.1 It is important that replication is restricted to S phase, and that the parental is only duplicated just once.2 Over-replication of DNA, under-replication of DNA, or replication of DNA outside of S phase can lead to genome instability and possibly cell death or cancer.2 The core enzymes of DNA replication are the DNA polymerases, which copy the parental duplex DNA.3 Pol a-primase supplies the initial nucleic acid primer for subsequent elongation by Pol d and Pol e .3 Pol e is devoted to replication on the leading strand, while Pol d is devoted to replication on the lagging strand,4 although recently this division of labor has been questioned.5 Importantly, Pol a-primase, Pol d, and Pol e each require singlestranded DNA templates (primed for Pol d and Pol e, or unprimed for Pol a-primase) for activity. Since the parental duplex is double-stranded, the replication fork helicase is required to melt the parental duplex to form single DNA strands (ssDNA).6 The replication fork helicase therefore functions before the replicative polymerases, and therefore the replication fork helicase is the physiologic target for cell cycle regulation.6
The Replication Fork Helicase is CMG The replication fork helicase is an 11subunit enzyme called CMG, composed of Cdc45 (Cell-division cycle 45], Mcm2–7 (Minichromosome maintenance, a heterohexamer of Mcm2, Mcm3, Mcm4, Mcm5, Mcm6, and Mcm7), and GINS (Japanese for Go, Ichi, Nii, Sans, or 5,1,2,3, or Sld5 [synthetic lethal with 449
dpb11-1 (DNA-polymerase B-interacting protein)], Psf1 (partner with Sld5), Psf2, Psf3).7 The Mcm2–7 heterohexameric ring complex is the motor of the CMG helicase.7,8 The 6 homologous Mcm subunits contain an N-terminal DNA-interacting and oligomerization domain and a C-terminal AAAC motor domain.9 The Mcm2–7 complex has very weak helicase and ATPase activity on its own, but the assembly with Cdc45 and the tetrameric GINS complex stimulates Mcm2–7 activity.7 Together, the CMG is very efficient in hydrolyzing ATP and processively unwinding DNA.7 The Mcm2–7 complex loads as an inactive head to head double hexamer to encircle double-stranded DNA during G1 phase in a reaction known as replication licensing.10,11 This reaction is ATPdependent and catalyzed by Orc, Cdc6, and Cdt1.10,11 The details of this reaction have recently been elucidated by a number of labs.12-14 This reaction is restricted to G1 phase in the cell cycle.15 Since Mcm27 complexes cannot load during S phase, this restriction of Mcm2–7 loading to G1 phase prevents re-replication or over-replication of the parental duplex DNA.15 An excess of Mcm2–7 complexes load onto double-stranded DNA relative to the Mcm2–7 complexes that are activated to unwind DNA at a replication fork.16 This was known as the Mcm paradox, since it was initially unclear why an excess of dormant Mcm2–7 complexes are loaded to encircle double-stranded DNA.16 Later it was discovered that the excess Mcm2–7 complexes are loaded as a “back-up” mechanism if cells are subjected to replication stress.16 This is important because it ensures that there is a sufficient number of loaded Mcm2–7 complexes before S phase begins, which is when licensing becomes inhibited. If cells encounter replication stress, additional loaded Mcm2–7 complexes are activated to help accomplish the complete replication of the genomic DNA.16 This “back-up” mechanism helps ensure that once DNA replication starts, DNA replication will eventually be completed to avoid genome instability.16 Dormant origins have also been shown to be an active tumor suppressor mechanism.17 Although the Mcm2–7 complex loads to encircle double-stranded DNA during
450
G1, the Mcm2–7 complex assembles with Cdc45 and GINS to form the CMG helicase during S phase.7,18-20 Thus, assembly of the CMG from Cdc45, Mcm2–7, and GINS is a critical S phase regulatory mechanism that restricts DNA replication to S phase.7,18-20 Furthermore, whereas there is an excess of loaded Mcm2–7 complexes relative to Mcm2–7 complexes that are subsequently activated, there is no evidence that fully assembled CMGs are present in excess.19,20 Thus, the assembly of Cdc45 and GINS with Mcm2–7 completes the assembly of the active helicase and marks the particular Mcm2–7 complex for activation and unwinding.7,18-21
Role of CDK and DDK in Helicase Assembly and Activation The assembly of the CMG can only occur during S phase because this step is regulated by 2 S-phase kinases, S-CDK (S-phase cyclin-dependent kinase) and DDK (Dbf4-dependent kinase).6 Moreover, CMG complex formation is also regulated in budding yeast by 4 initiationspecific protein factors, Sld2 (RecQL4 or RecQ4 in humans), Sld3 (Treslin or TICRR in humans), Sld7, and Dpb11 (TopBP1 in humans).6 These factors do not travel as part of the CMG active helicase.22 S-CDK plays also an important role in inhibiting the Mcm2–7 loading reaction during S phase, allowing licensing to take place only during G1.15 However, in addition, S-CDK phosphorylates Sld2 and Sld3 to trigger complex formation with Dpb11.23,24 This reaction is conserved from yeast to humans.25-28 Furthermore, Sld3 and Sld7 form a tetramer containing 2 subunits of Sld3 and 2 subunits of Sld7 in solution.29 Sld2, Sld3, Dpb11, and Dbf4 subunit of DDK are limiting during S phase, and overexpression of these factors causes late origins to fire early.30 Sld3 is also a target of the replication checkpoint, which functions to silence late origins during replication stress.31 The role of DDK during S phase is to phosphorylate subunits of the Mcm2–7 complex.32,33 The Mcm2, Mcm4, and Mcm6 subunits are phosphorylated by DDK during S phase.34,35
Nucleus
Phosphorylation of Mcm4 by DDK is important for the recruitment of Cdc45 to Mcm2–7.35-37 Furthermore, phosphorylation of Mcm4 by DDK alleviates an inhibitor activity present in the N-terminal region of Mcm4.38 The role of DDK phosphorylation of Mcm6 is currently under investigation.35 The role of DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 has been less clear and controversial. While some studies, including papers from our group, have suggested that DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is required for DNA replication under normal growth conditions,39,40 other studies have suggested that DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is only important during replication stress.41 Our studies suggesting that DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is required for cell growth under normal conditions used a galactose-inducible promoter, wherein galactose levels were varied to achieve wild-type levels of Mcm2 expression under normal conditions.42 Under these conditions, expression of kinase-dead Mcm2 (Mcm2-S164A, S170A) is lethal to these cells, and overexpression of kinase dead Mcm2 results in a dominant negative severe growth defect.42 The studies that conclude that DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is only important during replication stress were based upon a genomic insertion of the kinasedead mutant of mcm2 at the genomic locus, under regulation by native promoter.41 We recently acquired the yeast strain that harbored the genomic insertion of the kinase-dead mutant of mcm2.43 We overexpressed the kinasedead mutant of mcm2 in the wild-type yeast strain and in the yeast strain harboring the kinase dead mutant.43 Whereas overexpression of the kinase-dead mutant of mcm2 in wild-type cells results in a severe growth defect, overexpression of the same kinase dead mutant of mcm2 resulted in no defect in the cells harboring the genomic copy of kinase-dead mcm2.43 These data suggest that the strain with the genomic copy of kinasedead mcm2 harbored a suppressor mutation.43 Thus, this suppressor mutation explains the discrepancy between the conclusions from our different laboratories, and the data now point to the conclusion that DDK phosphorylation of
Volume 6 Issue 6
Mcm2 is required for DNA replication under normal growth conditions.39,42,43 The interaction between Mcm2 and Mcm5 in the Mcm2–7 ring may dissociate under certain conditions, acting as a ‘gate’ for the movement of dsDNA into the Mcm2–7 ring during G1.8,44 Work from our laboratory showed how DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 may have a critical role in modulating this gate. The phosphorylation of the N-terminal of Mcm2 by DDK may open the Mcm2–7 ring at the Mcm2-Mcm5 interface, allowing for ssDNA extrusion.42 The generation of ssDNA at origins of replication is critical for the timely assembly of the CMG helicase.42 Furthermore, expression of mcm5-bob1 (mcm5-P83L) bypasses the requirement for DDK in the cell,45 and expression of mcm5-bob1 also partially suppresses the growth inhibition induced by overexpression of kinase-dead mutant of mcm2.42 Mcm5-bob1 is also inhibited from binding Mcm2 relative to wild-type Mcm5, suggesting that the Mcm2-Mcm5 interface is a target of regulation by DDK.42
Roles of Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 in Helicase Assembly and Activation The roles of the essential initiation factors, Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11, are beginning to be elucidated. For example, recent structural data shows that the N-terminal region of Sld3 binds to Sld7, and Sld3 and Sld7 from a tetramer of 2 subunits each of Sld3 and Sld7 (Fig. 1).29 Furthermore, the middle domain of Sld3 binds to Cdc45, and structural data on this interaction is available as well.46 Moreover, Sld3 recruits Cdc45 to Mcm2–7 during S phase in a manner that is dependent on DDK.32,47 Dpb11 is believed to be a scaffolding protein that attaches to CDKphosphorylated Sld2 and Sld3.23,24 Each of these proteins, Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11, bind directly to Mcm2-7 and singlestranded DNA (ssDNA).48-50 These data suggest that Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 may play an active role in assembly or activation of the helicase.48-50 Furthermore, the ssDNA-binding properties of Sld2 and Sld3 are conserved in their human counterparts, RecQL4 and Treslin,
www.tandfonline.com
respectively.50,51 In addition, the region of Sld3 that binds to ssDNA and Mcm3 and Mcm5 subunits is the C-terminal domain of Sld3.50 What could be the functional role of Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 binding to ssDNA? Work from other labs suggests that single-stranded DNA is formed at an origin of replication during the process of replication initiation, in a process known as origin melting.52 Furthermore, in one model of replication elongation, the steric exclusion model, the lagging singlestranded DNA template is excluded from the central channel of the CMG replication fork helicase.53 Other models for replication fork helicase mechanism involve a ploughshare at the back of the helicase,54 or an exit channel for single-stranded DNA extrusion through the CMG.55 While details regarding CMG mechanism remain to be resolved, one theme in each of the models is for the separation of the 2 single DNA strands during helicase activation. Thus, during replication initiation, an ssDNA-binding platform is potentially generated for Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11. Since the Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 proteins bind to one another in a CDKdependent mechanism 23,24 and since Sld2, Sld3 or Dpb11 alone has considerable affinity for ssDNA,48-50 the Sld2Sld3-Dpb11 complex likely has a very tight affinity for ssDNA. Recent data from our lab suggest that Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 attachment to ssDNA at an origin of replication is required for DNA replication.48-50 In addition, we found that Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 interaction with ssDNA may be important for GINS attachment to Mcm2–7.48-50 This conclusion follows from the observation that Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 compete with GINS for Mcm2–7 in a manner that is influenced by ssDNA addition.48-50 In other words, Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 each interact with Mcm5 and Mcm3, the subunits of Mcm2–7 that contact GINS.48-50 Furthermore, addition of Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 to Mcm2–7 can dislodge GINS from Mcm2–7.48-50 However, single-stranded DNA also competes with Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11, but not GINS, for Mcm3/Mcm5 interaction.48-50 In addition, the addition of singlestranded DNA releases Sld2, Sld3, and
Nucleus
Dpb11 from Mcm3 and Mcm5, allowing GINS to bind to Mcm2–7 by a passive sequestration mechanism.48-50 There is also a recent manuscript from the Speck lab demonstrating that Sld2 and Sld3 exhibit an anti-cooperative mechanism for recruiting Cdc45 to loaded Mcm2–7 complexes.56 In other words, Sld2 and Sld3 release from Mcm2–7 once Cdc45 is recruited to Mcm2–7.56 Further details about the process of origin melting and helicase activation are not yet resolved, but the development of an in vitro replication initiation assay by the Diffley lab holds promise that many of these details will soon be revealed.32 Dbf4, Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 are present in low amounts in the cell.30 Thus, they can only bind to certain Mcm2–7 complexes, marking them for subsequent CMG helicase assembly and activation. But what is to prevent DDK from phosphorylating one Mcm2–7 complex, while Sld3, for example, binds to a different Mcm2–7 complex? A potential answer to this question has recently been revealed by work from our lab.43 DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is a very weak reaction in vitro, and only a fraction of Mcm2 proteins are phosphorylated by DDK in a kinase assay using purified DDK and Mcm2.40 In spite of this weak activity in vitro, we demonstrated an in vivo DNA replication function for DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2.42,43 Thus, the data suggested that a critical factor was missing from our in vitro phosphorylation assay.43,44
Is Sld3/Treslin a Conductor of Helicase Assembly and Activation? We examined Sld2, Sld3, and Dpb11 for their effect on DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 in vitro, and found that Sld3 exerts an 11-fold stimulation of DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2.43 In contrast, the ability of Sld2 and Dpb11 to stimulate DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is very slight.43 Furthermore, Treslin, the human ortholog of Sld3, stimulates human DDK phosphorylation of human Mcm2 by 15fold.43 Thus, the ability of Sld3/Treslin to substantially stimulate DDK
451
References
Figure 1. The modular domain organization of Sld3 is shown. The N-terminal domain (amino acids 1-115) binds to Sld7. The middle domain (amino acids 148-430) binds to Cdc45. The C-terminal domain (amino acids 511-668) binds to ssDNA, binds to Mcm3/Mcm5, and stimulates DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2.
phosphorylation of Mcm2 is conserved from yeast to human.43 This observation may help explain the question asked above, what keeps Sld3 from binding to one Mcm2–7 complex, while DDK phosphorylates a different Mcm2–7 complex? The answer is surprisingly simple. Sld3/Treslin binds to Mcm2–7 and activates DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 at the same time.43,50 Thus, Sld3/Treslin is a conductor of replication initiation. Sld3/Treslin performs several functions upon binding to Mcm27: 1 Sld3/Treslin recruits Cdc45 to Mcm2–7 in a manner that depends upon DDK,47,2 Sld3/Treslin stimulates DDK phosphorylation of the Mcm2 subunit of the Mcm2–7 complex,43,3 Sld3/Treslin binds to ssDNA once the origin is melted, dissociating from Mcm2–7 and allowing GINS to bind Mcm2–7.50 By performing these 3 biochemical reactions at a given Mcm2–7 complex, Sld3/Treslin coordinates helicase assembly with helicase activation.43,47,50
reports suggest that Mcm10 is involved in the recruitment of Cdc45 to Mcm2–7,6063 while recent reports suggest that Mcm10 is involved in a step following CMG assembly.64-66 These recent reports suggest that Mcm10 plays a role in activating the fully-assembled CMG. It may be that both models are correct; in other words, Mcm10 may have multiple functions in replication initiation. Future work may help resolve this controversy. There are also reports concluding that Mcm10 is a component of the CMG during replication elongation, providing stability to the Pol a-primase.67,68 Thus, Mcm10 is required for initiation, and it is also required for replication elongation.
The Role of Mcm10 in DNA Replication Initiation
Funding
Mcm10 is also required for the initiation of DNA replication.57-59 Some early
452
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Funding was provided by Florida State University and the National Science Foundation, grant number 1265431 to D.L.K.
Nucleus
1. Bell SP, Dutta A. DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Biochem 2002; 71:333-74; PMID:12045100; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev. biochem.71.110601.135425 2. Green B, Finn K, Li J. Loss of DNA replication control is a potent inducer of gene amplification. Science 2010; 329:943-46; PMID:20724634; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1190966 3. Georgescu R, Schauer G, Yao N, Langston L, Yurieva O, Zhang D, Finkelstein J, O’Donnell, M. Reconstitution of a eukaryotic replisome reveals suppression mechanisms that define leading/lagging strand operation. Elife 2015; 4:e04988; PMID:25871847; http:// dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04988 4. Pursell Z, Isoz I, Lundstr€om E, Johansson E, Kunkel T. Yeast DNA polymerase epsilon participates in leadingstrand DNA replication. Science 2007; 317:127-30; PMID:17615360; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.1144067 5. Johnson R, Klassen R, Prakash L, Prakash S. A Major Role of DNA Polymerase d in Replication of Both the Leading and Lagging DNA Strands. Mol Cell 2015; 59:163-75; PMID:26145172; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.038 6. Tognetti S, Riera A, Speck C. Switch on the engine: how the eukaryotic replicative helicase MCM2-7 becomes activated. Chromosoma 2015; 124:13-26; PMID:25308420; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412014-0489-2 7. Ilves I, Petojevic T, Pesavento J, Botchan M. Activation of the MCM2-7 Helicase by Association with Cdc45 and GINS Proteins. Mol Cell 2010; 37:247-58; PMID:20122406; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2009.12.030 8. Bochman M, Schwacha A. The Mcm2-7 complex has in vitro helicase activity. Mol Cell 2008; 31:287-93; PMID:18657510; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2008.05.020 9. Fletcher R, Shen J, Gomez-Llorente Y, Martin CS, Carazo JM, Chen X. Double hexamer disruption and biochemical activities of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum MCM. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:42405-10; PMID:16221679; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M509773200 10. Remus D, Beuron F, Tolun G, Griffith J, Morris E, Diffley J. Concerted loading of Mcm2-7 double hexamers around DNA during DNA replication origin licensing. Cell 2009; 139:719-730; PMID:19896182; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2009.10.015 11. Evrin C, Clarke P, Zech J, Lurz R, Sun J, Uhle S, Li H, Stillman B, Speck C. A double-hexameric MCM2-7 complex is loaded onto origin DNA during licensing of eukaryotic DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:20240-20245; PMID:19910535; http://dx. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911500106 12. Ticau S, Friedman L, Ivica N, Gelles J, Bell S. Singlemolecule studies of origin licensing reveal mechanisms ensuring bidirectional helicase loading. Cell 2015; 161:513-525; PMID:25892223; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.012 13. Frigola J, Remus D, Mehanna A, Diffley J. ATPasedependent quality control of DNA replication origin licensing. Nature 2013; 495:339-343; PMID:23474987; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature11920 14. Fernandez-Cid A, Riera A, Tognetti S, Herrera M, Samel S, Evrin C, Winkler C, Gardenal E, Uhle S, Speck C. An ORC/Cdc6/MCM2-7 Complex Is Formed in a Multistep Reaction to Serve as a Platform for MCM Double-Hexamer Assembly. Mol Cell 2013; 50:577-588; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2013.03.026 15. Diffley J. The many faces of redundancy in DNA replication control. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2010; 75:135-142; PMID:21502406; http://dx.doi. org/10.1101/sqb.2010.75.062
Volume 6 Issue 6
16. Ge X, Jackson D, Blow J. Dormant origins licensed by excess Mcm2-7 are required for human cells to survive replicative stress. Genes Dev 2007; 21:3331-3341; PMID:18079179; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/ gad.457807 17. Kawabata T, Luebben S, Yamaguchi S, Ilves I, Matise I, Buske T, Botchan M, Shima N. Stalled fork rescue via dormant replication origins in unchallenged S phase promotes proper chromosome segregation and tumor suppression. Mol Cell 2011; 41:543-553; PMID:21362550; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2011.02.006 18. Moyer S, Lewis P, Botchan M. Isolation of the Cdc45/ Mcm2-7/GINS (CMG) complex, a candidate for the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:10236-10241; PMID:16798881; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.0602400103 19. Gambus A, Jones RC, Sanchez-Diaz A, Kanemaki M, Deursen FV, Edmondson RD, Labib K. GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:358-366; PMID:16531994; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ ncb1382 20. Pacek M, Tutter A, Kubota Y, Takisawa H, Walter J. Localization of MCM2-7, Cdc45, and GINS to the site of DNA unwinding during eukaryotic DNA replication. Mol Cell 2006; 21:581-587; PMID:16483939; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.030 21. Costa A, Renault L, Swuec P, Petojevic T, Pesavento J, Ilves I, MacLellan-Gibson K, Fleck R, Botchan M, Berger J. DNA binding polarity, dimerization, and ATPase ring remodeling in the CMG helicase of the eukaryotic replisome. Elife 2014; 3 Aug 12:e03273 22. Kanemaki M, Labib K. Distinct roles for Sld3 and GINS during establishment and progression of eukaryotic DNA replication forks. EMBO J 2006; 25:17531763; PMID:16601689; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj. emboj.7601063 23. Zegerman P, Diffley JF. Phosphorylation of Sld2 and Sld3 by cyclin-dependent kinases promotes DNA replication in budding yeast. Nature 2007; 445:281-285; PMID:17167417; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature05432 24. Tanaka S, Umemori T, Hirai K, Muramatsu S, Kamimura Y, Araki H. CDK-dependent phosphorylation of Sld2 and Sld3 initiates DNA replication in budding yeast. Nature 2007; 445:328-332; PMID:17167415; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05465 25. Kumagai A, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Dunphy W. Treslin collaborates with TopBP1 in triggering the initiation of DNA replication. Cell 2010; 140:349-359; PMID:20116089; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2009.12.049 26. Kumagai A, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Dunphy W. Direct regulation of Treslin by cyclin-dependent kinase is essential for the onset of DNA replication. J Cell Biol 2011; 193:995-1007; PMID:21646402; http://dx.doi. org/10.1083/jcb.201102003 27. Matsuno K, Kumano M, Kubota Y, Hashimoto Y, Takisawa H. The N-terminal noncatalytic region of Xenopus RecQ4 is required for chromatin binding of DNA polymerase a in the initiation of DNA replication. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:4843-4852; PMID:16782873; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ MCB.02267-05 28. Boos D, Sanchez-Pulido L, Rappas M, Pearl L, Oliver A, Ponting C, Diffley J. Regulation of DNA Replication through Sld3-Dpb11 Interaction Is Conserved from Yeast to Humans. Curr Biol 2011; 21:1152-1157; PMID:21700459; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cub.2011.05.057 29. Itou H, Shirakihara Y, Araki H. The quaternary structure of the eukaryotic DNA replication proteins Sld7 and Sld3. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2015; 71:1649-1656; PMID:26249346; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1107/S1399004715010457
www.tandfonline.com
30. Mantiero D, Mackenzie A, Donaldson A, Zegerman P. Limiting replication initiation factors execute the temporal programme of origin firing in budding yeast. EMBO J 2011; 30:4805-4814; PMID:22081107; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.404 31. Zegerman P, Diffley JFX. DNA replication as a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8:1077-1088; PMID:19505853; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.023 32. Yeeles J, Deegan T, Janska A, Early A, Diffley J. Regulated eukaryotic DNA replication origin firing with purified proteins. Nature 2015; 519:431-435; PMID:25739503; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature14285 33. Labib K. How do Cdc7 and cyclin-dependent kinases trigger the initiation of chromosome replication in eukaryotic cells?s Genes Dev 2010; 24:1208-1219; PMID:20551170; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/ gad.1933010 34. Randell J, Fan A, Chan C, Francis L, Heller R, Galani K, Bell S. Mec1 is one of multiple kinases that prime the Mcm2-7 helicase for phosphorylation by Cdc7. Mol Cell 2010; 40:353-363; PMID:21070963; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.10.017 35. Masai H, Taniyama C, Ogino K, Matsui E, Kakusho N, Matsumoto S, Kim J, Ishii A, Tanaka T, Kobayashi T, et al. Phosphorylation of MCM4 by Cdc7 kinase facilitates its interaction with Cdc45 on the chromatin. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:39249-39261; PMID:17046832; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M608935200 36. Sheu YJ, Stillman B. Cdc7-Dbf4 phosphorylates MCM proteins via a docing site-mediated mechanism to promote S phase progression. Mol Cell 2006; 24:101-113; PMID:17018296; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2006.07.033 37. Sheu Y, Kinney J, Lengronne A, Pasero P, Stillman B. Domain within the helicase subunit Mcm4 integrates multiple kinase signals to control DNA replication initiation and fork progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:E1899-1908; PMID:24740181; http://dx. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404063111 38. Sheu Y, Stillman B. The Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase promotes S phase by alleviating an inhibitory activity in Mcm4. Nature 2010; 463:113-117; PMID:20054399; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08647 39. Lei M, Kawasaki Y, Young M, Kihara M, Sugino A, Tye B. MCM2 is a target of regulation by Cdc7-Dbf4 during the initiation of DNA synthesis. Genes Dev 1997; 11:3365-3374; PMID:9407029; http://dx.doi. org/10.1101/gad.11.24.3365 40. Bruck I, Kaplan D. Dbf4-Cdc7 phosphorylation of Mcm2 is required for cell growth. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:28823-28831; PMID:19692334; http://dx.doi. org/10.1074/jbc.M109.039123 41. Stead B, Brandl C, Davey M. Phosphorylation of Mcm2 modulates Mcm2-7 activity and affects the cell’s response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:6998-7008; PMID:21596784; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/nar/gkr371 42. Bruck I, Kaplan DL. The Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase promotes Mcm2-7 ring opening to allow for single-stranded DNA extrusion and helicase assembly. J Biol Chem 2015; 290:1210-1221; PMID:25471369; http://dx. doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.608232 43. Bruck I, Kaplan D. Conserved mechanism for coordinating replication fork helicase assembly with phosphorylation of the helicase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112:11223-11228; PMID:26305950; http://dx. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509608112 44. Samel S, Fernandez-Cid A, Sun J, Riera A, Tognetti S, Herrera M, Li H, Speck C. A unique DNA entry gate serves for regulated loading of the eukaryotic replicative helicase MCM2-7 onto DNA. Genes Dev 2014; 28:1653-1666; PMID:25085418; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/gad.242404.114 45. Hardy CFJ, Dryga O, Seematter S, Pahl PMB, Sclafani RA. mcm5/cdc46-bob1 bypasses the requirement for
Nucleus
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
the S phase activatorCdc7p. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94:3151-3155; PMID:9096361; http://dx.doi. org/10.1073/pnas.94.7.3151 Itou H, Muramatsu S, Shirakihara Y, Araki H. Crystal structure of the homology domain of the eukaryotic DNA replication proteins Sld3 Treslin Structure 2014; 22:1341-1347; PMID:25126958; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.str.2014.07.001 Kamimura Y, Tak YS, Sugino A, Araki H. Sld3, which interacts with Cdc45 (Sld4), functions for chromosomal DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 2001; 20:2097-2107; PMID:11296242; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.8.2097 Dhingra N, Bruck I, Smith S, Ning B, Kaplan D. Dpb11 helps control assembly of the Cdc45-Mcm2-7GINS replication fork helicase. J Biol Chem 2015; 290:7586-7601; PMID:25659432; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M115.640383 Bruck I, Kaplan D. The replication initiation protein sld2 regulates helicase assembly. J Biol Chem 2014; 289:1948-1959; PMID:24307213; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M113.532085 Bruck I, Kaplan DL. The replication initiation protein Sld3/Treslin orchestrates the assembly of the replication fork helicase during S phase. J Biol Chem 2015; 290 (45):27414-24; PMID: 26405041; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M115.688424 Ohlenschl€ager O, Kuhnert A, Schneider A, Haumann S, Bellstedt P, Keller H, Saluz HP, Hortschansky P, H€anel F, Grosse F, et al. The N-terminus of the human RecQL4 helicase is a homeodomain-like DNA interaction motif. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:8309-8324; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks591 Geraghty D, Ding M, Heintz N, Pederson D. Premature structural changes at replication origins in a yeast minichromosome maintenance (MCM) mutant. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:18011-18021; PMID:10751424; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M909787199 Fu Y, Yardimci H, Long D, Ho T, Guainazzi A, Bermudez V, Hurwitz J, van Oijen A, Sch€arer O, Walter J. Selective bypass of a lagging strand roadblock by the eukaryotic replicative DNA helicase. Cell 2011; 146:931-941; PMID:21925316; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.045 Takahashi TS, Wigley DB, Walter JC. Pumps, paradoxes, and ploughshares: mechanism of the Mcm2-7 DNA helicase. Trends Biochem Sci 2005; 30:437-444; PMID:16002295; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. tibs.2005.06.007 Gai D, Chang Y, Chen X. Origin DNA melting and unwinding in DNA replication. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2010; 20:756-762; PMID:20870402; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.sbi.2010.08.009 Herrera, MC, Tognetti, S, Riera, A, Zech, J, Clarke P, Fernandez-Cid A, Speck C. A reconstituted system reveals how activating and inhibitory interactions control DDK dependent assembly of the eukaryotic replicative helicase. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43(21):1023810250; PMID: 26338774; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ nar/gkv881 Solomon N, Wright M, Chang S, Buckley A, Dumas L, Gaber R. Genetic and molecular analysis of DNA43 and DNA52: two new cell-cycle genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1992; 8:273-289; PMID:1514326; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.320080405 Merchant A, Kawasaki Y, Chen Y, Lei M, Tye BK. A lesion in the DNA replication initiation factor Mcm10 induces pausing of elongation forks through chromosomal replication origins in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:3261-3271; PMID:9154825; http://dx.doi. org/10.1128/MCB.17.6.3261 Thu Y, Bielinsky A. Enigmatic rles of Mcm10 in DNA replication. Trends Biochem Sci 2013; 38:184-194; PMID:23332289; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. tibs.2012.12.003 Wohlschlegel J, Dhar S, Prokhorova T, Dutta, A, Walter J. Xenopus Mcm10 binds to origins of DNA replication after Mcm2-7 and stimulates origin binding of
453
Cdc45. Mol Cell 2002; 9:233-240; PMID:11864598; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00456-2 61. Gregan J, Lindner K, Brimage L, Franklin R, Namdar M, Hart E, Aves S, Kearsey S. Fission yeast Cdc23/ Mcm10 functions after pre-replicative complex formation to promote Cdc45 chromatin binding. Mol Biol Cell 2003; 14:3876-3887; PMID:12972571; http://dx. doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E03-02-0090 62. Sawyer S, Cheng I, Chai W, Tye B. Mcm10 and Cdc45 cooperate in origin activation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Biol 2004; 340:195-202; PMID:15201046; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.04.066 63. Im JS, Ki SH, Farina A, Jung DS, Hurwitz J, Leea JK. Assembly of the Cdc45-Mcm2-7-GINS complex in human cells requires the Ctf4/And-1, RecQL4, and
454
Mcm10 proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:15628-15632; PMID:19805216; http://dx.doi. org/10.1073/pnas.0908039106 64. Watase G, Takisawa H, Kanemaki M. Mcm10 plays a role in functioning of the eukaryotic replicative DNA helicase, Cdc45-Mcm-GINS. Curr Biol 2012; 22:343349; PMID:22285032; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cub.2012.01.023 65. van Deursen F, Sengupta S, De Piccoli G, Sanchez-Diaz A, Labib K. Mcm10 associates with the loaded DNA helicase at replication origins and defines a novel step in its activation. EMBO J 2012; 31:2195-2206; PMID:22433841; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.69 66. Kanke M, Kodama Y, Takahashi T, Nakagawa T, Masukata H. Mcm10 plays an essential role in origin
Nucleus
DNA unwinding after loading of the CMG components. EMBO J 2012; 31:2182-2194; PMID:22433840; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ emboj.2012.68 67. Ricke R, Bielinsky A. A conserved Hsp10-like domain in Mcm10 is required to stabilize the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase-a in budding yeast. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:18414-18425; PMID:16675460; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M513551200 68. Ricke RM, Bielinsky AK. Mcm10 regulates the stability and chromatin association of DNA polymerase-a. Mol Cell 2004; 16:173-185; PMID:15494305; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2004.09.017
Volume 6 Issue 6
