3496
OPTICS LETTERS / Vol. 39, No. 12 / June 15, 2014
Self-aligned optical couplings by self-organized waveguides toward luminescent targets in organic/inorganic hybrid materials Tetsuzo Yoshimura,1,* Makoto Iida,1 and Hideyuki Nawata2 1 2
Tokyo University of Technology, 1404-1 Katakura, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0982, Japan
Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd., 3-7-1 Kanda-Nishiki-Cho, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo 101-0054, Japan *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received March 11, 2014; revised April 9, 2014; accepted April 16, 2014; posted April 18, 2014 (Doc. ID 207951); published June 6, 2014
Self-organization of optical waveguides is observed between two opposed optical fibers placed in a photosensitive organic/inorganic hybrid material, Sunconnect. A luminescent target containing coumarin 481 was deposited onto the edge of one of the two fibers at the core. When a 448-nm write beam was introduced from the other fiber, the write beam and the luminescence from the photoexcited target increased the refractive index of Sunconnect to induce self-focusing. Traces of waveguides were seen to grow from the cores of both fibers and merged into a single self-aligned optical coupling between the fibers. This optical solder functionality enabled increases in both coupling efficiency and tolerance to lateral misalignment of the fibers. © 2014 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (260.5950) Self-focusing; (130.5460) Polymer waveguides; (200.4650) Optical interconnects. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.003496
Because optical interconnects are promising technologies for overcoming bottlenecks in computing [1] such as clock rates, input/output counts, and cooling, there has been considerable research on the implementation of optical wiring into computers [2–8]. One of the challenges of using optical interconnects is the difficulty of creating optical couplings between optical devices. Although edge coupling [9] and grating coupling [10] techniques have been developed, these require precise alignment at a number of coupling points, raising the system cost. To solve this, we propose an optical coupling technique based on a self-organized lightwave network (SOLNET), which makes use of self-focusing between write beams in photoinduced refractive-index increase (PRI) materials such as photopolymers. Optical waveguide formation in photopolymers was first reported by Frisken [11]. A self-written waveguide was formed by the emission of a write beam from an optical fiber core into a photopolymer. Further research work has since been conducted in this field using photopolymers [12–15], glasses [16], and photorefractive crystals [17]. Meanwhile, in SOLNET [18], an attractive force between a plurality of write beams in PRI materials is utilized. This allows construction of self-aligned optical waveguides between misaligned optical devices and operates as an optical solder. A simplified SOLNET fabrication process has also been developed as reflectiveSOLNET (R-SOLNET), which uses reflecting elements such as mirrors and wavelength filters [19]. Recently, the use of R-SOLNET with luminescent targets was proposed and was demonstrated both theoretically [20] and experimentally [21]. In R-SOLNET using a luminescent target, optical devices such as optical fibers, waveguides, laser diodes, light modulators, tunable wavelength filters, or photodetectors are placed into a PRI material as shown in Fig. 1. The PRI material is typically based on a photopolymer, photosensitive glass, or photorefractive crystal with a 0146-9592/14/123496-04$15.00/0
refractive index that increases upon write beam exposure. A luminescent target is deposited at the active site of one of the optical devices. When a write beam is introduced into the PRI material from the other optical device, the luminescent target is excited by the write beam and generates luminescence. In the region where the write beam and the luminescent emission from the target overlap, the refractive index increases more rapidly than in the surrounding region. The write beam and the emission from the luminescent target interact and merge through a self-focusing effect that constructs a self-aligned optical coupling (R-SOLNET) between the optical devices. This occurs automatically, even where misalignment and core size mismatch exist between the optical devices. Although the luminescent target remains permanently attached to the optical device, signal beams with wavelengths in the near-infrared region can propagate through the target where its absorbance is low. In a previous study on R-SOLNET using luminescent targets, three issues were found. A first issue was the poor transparency of the luminescent target used.
Optical Device
Luminescent Write Beam Luminescence Target
(1) PRI Material
(2) R-SOLNET
Self-Focusing
(3) Fig. 1.
(4) Concept of R-SOLNET with luminescent targets.
© 2014 Optical Society of America
June 15, 2014 / Vol. 39, No. 12 / OPTICS LETTERS
Absorption: Sunconnect
Photoluminescence (Excitation at 448 nm): Coumarin 481/Sunconnect 1
1 405
448
0.5
0.5
0
400
500 Wavelength (nm)
600
0
Luminescence Intensity (arb. units)
Absorbance (arb. units)
Because tris(8-hydroxyquinolinato)aluminum (Alq3) powder dispersed in polyvinyl alcohol was used for the target, the probe beams were scattered by the powder dispersed in the structure. This prevented us from measuring the coupling efficiency. A second issue was the balance of the sensitivity of the PRI material to different wavelengths of light. The photopolymer (a composite of Norland Optical Adhesive NOA65 and NOA81) used in the previous experiments had a high sensitivity in the ultraviolet region, decreasing at longer wavelengths. When a 405-nm write beam and an Alq3-containing target, having peak luminescence ∼500 nm, were used, a large wavelength separation of ∼95 nm existed between the write beam and the luminescence. The sensitivity to the luminescence was therefore very low compared with that to the write beam, reducing the targeting effect of the Alq3 target. A third issue was stability of the PRI material. Norland Optical Adhesive is not a typical material for optical waveguides, but an adhesive. It is preferable to use an optical waveguide material with better long-term stability for the R-SOLNET to improve the durability of R-SOLNET used with optical waveguides in optical interconnects. In this Letter, we fabricated nonscattering luminescent targets located at the core edges of the optical fibers. The luminescent targets contained the dye coumarin 481, which has a luminescence peak at 470 nm. A 448-nm light source was used for write beams to reduce the wavelength separation between the write beam and the luminescence to ∼22 nm. These conditions enabled us to measure coupling efficiency between optical fibers connected by R-SOLNET and reduce the sensitivity imbalance between the write beam and the luminescence. For the PRI material, a novel photosensitive organic/ inorganic hybrid material, Sunconnect, was used. The refractive index of Sunconnect increases from ∼1.59 to ∼1.60 through write beam exposure. Sunconnect was developed by Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd., as an optical waveguide material with long-term stability [22,23]. R-SOLNET experiments were performed using optical fibers with core diameters of ∼50 μm, denoted by 50-μm fiber, and ∼10 μm, denoted by 10-μm fiber. The former was an ordinary graded-index multimode fiber and the latter a single-mode fiber. To enhance the targeting effect, the sensitivity of the PRI material to the luminescence should be comparable with, or higher than, that to the write beam. As Fig. 2 shows, in Sunconnect the absorption spectrum has a
Fig. 2. Absorption spectrum of Sunconnect and photoluminescence spectrum of the coumarin 481/Sunconnect luminescent target excited by the write beam at 448 nm.
3497
peak in the ultraviolet region, and the absorbance decreases at longer wavelengths, indicating that the sensitivity decreases at longer wavelengths. The photoluminescence spectrum of Sunconnect containing coumarin 481, which is used as the luminescent target, has a peak around 470 nm. Then, for a 405-nm write beam, the wavelength separation is 65 nm, and for a 448-nm write beam, the wavelength separation is 22 nm. The 448-nm write beam is therefore preferable for reducing the sensitivity imbalance. Figure 3 shows optical waveguides grown from 50-μm fibers in Sunconnect. The refractive index contrast between the core and cladding is expected to be ∼1.60∕1.59. The write beam power required to form a 1.5-mm-long optical waveguide is almost two orders of magnitude larger for the write beam wavelength, λw , of 448 nm than for λw of 405 nm. This can be attributed to the lower absorbance of Sunconnect at 448 nm as shown in Fig. 2. In Fig. 3 a straight waveguide is shown that was formed using the 448-nm write beam. A nonuniform widened waveguide was formed for the 405-nm write beam. This difference can be explained in terms of the differing write beam absorption in the PRI material as indicted in Fig. 4. If there is large write beam absorption, the write beam may propagate only a short distance and form a short waveguide. After the waveguide formation has taken place, the absorbance in the waveguide region decreases because of decomposition of the sensitizers so that another stage of waveguide formation can start. By repeating this process, a long waveguide is formed in a stepwise manner. This may result in nonuniformity of the waveguide shape. Conversely, for small write beam absorption, the write beam can propagate over a longer distance, allowing uniform self-focusing to occur. This results in the formation of a straight waveguide with λW : 405 nm, Power: 1 µW
(a)
500 µm
λW : 448 nm, Power: 40 µW
(b)
tW: 120 s
tW: 45 s
500 µm
Fig. 3. Optical waveguides grown from 50-μm fibers in Sunconnect by write beams with wavelengths of (a) 405 nm and (b) 448 nm.
Write Beam Absorption Large
Small
Fig. 4. Schematic of the influence of write beam absorption in PRI materials on waveguide shape.
3498
OPTICS LETTERS / Vol. 39, No. 12 / June 15, 2014 Coumarin 481/Sunconnect
Optical Fiber
50-µm Fiber
tW=15 s
20 s
Core Cured Region
UV Light 200 µm
Luminescent Target
(a)
Luminescent Target
Etching
40 s
50 s
50-µm Fiber
Luminescent Target 200 µm
(b)
Fig. 5. (a) Illustration of the process for luminescent target fabrication at the core edge of a fiber. (b) Photograph of a luminescent target under excitation at 448 nm.
a more uniform shape. Low absorbance of the PRI material is also desirable for the formation of R-SOLNET using luminescent targets because the write beam can reach the target without attenuation by the medium so that strong luminescence can be generated. To deposit a luminescent target onto the core of an optical fiber, we used the process shown in Fig. 5(a). The fiber edge was coated by coumarin 481 dissolved in Sunconnect at concentration of ∼0.1 wt:%. The coating was exposed to ultraviolet light from the fiber core, which cured the region just on the core. The luminescent target was obtained by wet etching the coating to remove the noncured part using a mixture of isopropyl alcohol/ 4-methyl-2-pentanone. Figure 5(b) shows a photograph of a luminescent target emitting luminescence by excitation at 448 nm. Figure 6 shows an R-SOLNET grown between a 50-μm fiber core and the edge of an opposite fiber in Sunconnect. The fiber-to-fiber distance, L, is 250 μm, and the lateral misalignment, d, is 30 μm. A 405-nm write beam is introduced from the fiber on the left. The trace of the waveguide induced by the write beam grows from the left-hand side. Another trace of the waveguide, induced by light reflected from the edge of the right-hand-side fiber, also develops. The two traces finally merge to form the R-SOLNET. µm Fiber 50-µ
200 µm
tW=5 s
15 s
As shown in Fig. 6, emission from the luminescent target is not observed. Consequently the luminescent target does not have an effect on R-SOLNET formation. The absence of luminescence is explained as follows. Because the sensitivity of Sunconnect is relatively high at 405 nm, as shown in Fig. 2, the 405-nm write beam can be of a low power for SOLNET formation. This power is not sufficient to induce observable luminescence from the target. Figure 7 shows an R-SOLNET grown between a 50-μm fiber core and a luminescent target on a 50-μm fiber core edge in Sunconnect. The two fibers are placed at L of 250 μm and d of 20 μm. A 448-nm write beam is introduced from the fiber on the left. Bright blue luminescence from the target is observed. As write beam irradiation progresses, the trace of waveguide growth from the core of the fiber on the left can be observed. At the same time, the trace of waveguide growth from the luminescent target on the right is observed, which is induced by luminescence from the target. The two traces finally merge into a single waveguide and form an R-SOLNET based on a luminescent target. Figure 8 shows an R-SOLNET grown between a 10-μm fiber core and a luminescent target on a 10-μm fiber core edge, induced by a 448-nm write beam introduced from the left-hand fiber. Luminescence from the target is observed, and the trace of waveguide growth from the fiber on the left and another trace of waveguide growth from the luminescent target are observed. The two traces 10-µ µm Fiber
100 µm
Luminescent Target 20 s
Fig. 7. Photograph showing an R-SOLNET grown between a 50-μm fiber core and a luminescent target on a 50-μm fiber core edge in Sunconnect by a 448-nm (20 μW) write beam for L 250 μm and d 20 μm.
30 s
tW=3 s
10 s
Luminescent Target 20 s
30 s
Reflection
Fig. 6. Photograph showing an R-SOLNET grown between a 50-μm fiber core and the edge of an opposing fiber in Sunconnect by a 405-nm (100 nW) write beam for L 250 μm and d 30 μm.
Fig. 8. Photograph showing an R-SOLNET grown between a 10-μm fiber core and a luminescent target on a 10-μm fiber core edge in Sunconnect by a 448-nm (20 μW) write beam for L 190 μm and d 9 μm.
June 15, 2014 / Vol. 39, No. 12 / OPTICS LETTERS 100
Coupling Efficiency (%)
After R-SOLNET Formation 80
2.
60
40
Before R-SOLNET Formation
4.
20
0
3.
L: 300 µm λProbe: 856 nm 0
10
20 Lateral Misalignment, d (µm)
30
Fig. 9. Coupling efficiency between 50-μm fibers connected by R-SOLNET with luminescent targets.
finally merge into a single R-SOLNET. We show that an R-SOLNET can be formed between 10-μm fibers as well as between 50-μm fibers. The coupling efficiency was measured between the 50-μm fibers connected by R-SOLNET with luminescent targets for an L of 300 μm. The probe beam wavelength, λProbe , was 856 nm. As Fig. 9 shows, the coupling efficiency decreases with the lateral misalignment between the fibers. Using R-SOLNET the coupling efficiency increases by 10%–30%. The use of R-SOLNET also increases tolerance to lateral misalignment. These results indicate that R-SOLNET with luminescent targets has potential to realize the functions of an optical solder for in-plane couplings and, in principle, for surfacenormal couplings such as couplings between waveguide gratings and optical fibers. However, the efficiency of the R-SOLNET coupling (∼80%) remains limited, which might be attributed to nonoptimized luminescent target structures. The target shape and reproducibility of target formation may be improved by optimization of the fabrication processes in our future work. Furthermore, coupling efficiency between 10-μm fibers will be evaluated. In conclusion, we demonstrate self-aligned optical couplings between 50-μm fibers and between 10-μm fibers using R-SOLNET, where the optical waveguides self-organize based on luminescent targets. A novel organic/inorganic hybrid material, Sunconnect, which was developed as a material for optical waveguides, was used as the PRI material. To enhance the targeting effect, adjustment of the sensitivity balance was attempted by using 448-nm write beams and coumarin481-containing luminescent targets. R-SOLNET was found to widen the tolerance to the lateral misalignment between optical fibers, indicating that it could potentially function as an optical solder. References 1. D. A. B. Miller, “How large a system can we build without optics?” Workshop Notes, 8th Annual Workshop on
5.
6. 7. 8.
9.
10.
11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.
18.
19. 20. 21. 22. 23.
3499
Interconnections within High Speed Digital Systems, Santa Fe, New Mexico, May 12, 1997, Lecture 1.2. N. M. Jokerst, M. A. Brooke, S. Cho, S. Wilkinson, M. Vrazel, S. Fike, J. Tabler, Y. J. Joo, S. Seo, D. S. Wils, and A. Brown, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 9, 350 (2003). C. Choi, L. Lin, Y. Liu, J. Choi, L. Wang, D. Haas, J. Magera, and R. T. Chen, J. Lightwave Technol. 22, 2168 (2004). E. Bosman, J. Missinne, B. V. Hoe, G. V. Steenberge, S. Kalathimekkad, J. V. Erps, I. Milenkov, K. Panajotov, T. V. Gijseghem, P. Dubruel, H. Thienpont, and P. V. Daele, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 17, 617 (2011). F. E. Doany, C. L. Schow, B. G. Lee, R. Budd, C. Baks, R. Dangel, R. John, F. Libsch, J. A. Kash, B. Chan, H. Lin, C. Carver, J. Huang, J. Berry, and D. Bajkowski, in Proceedings of 61st Electronic Components & Technology Conference (IEEE, 2011), pp. 790–797. R. Nair, T. Gu, and M. W. Haney, in IEEE Optical Interconnects Conference (IEEE, 2012), pp. 18–19. X. Lin, A. Hosseini, X. Dou, H. Subbaraman, and R. T. Chen, Opt. Express 21, 60 (2013). T. Yoshimura, Y. Takahashi, M. Inao, M. Lee, W. Chou, S. Beilin, W. V. Wang, J. Roman, and T. Massingill, “Systems based on opto-electronic substrates with electrical and optical interconnections and methods for making,” U.S. patent 6,343,171 (January 29, 2002). F. E. Doany, B. G. Lee, S. N. Assefa, W. M. J. Green, M. Yang, C. L. Schow, C. V. Jahnes, S. Zhang, J. Singer, V. I. Kopp, J. A. Kash, and Y. A. Vlasov, J. Lightwave Technol. 29, 475 (2011). A. Mekis, S. Gloeckner, G. Masini, A. Narasimha, T. Pinguet, S. Sahni, and P. D. Dobbelaere, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 17, 597 (2011). S. J. Frisken, Opt. Lett. 18, 1035 (1993). A. S. Kewitsch and A. Yariv, Opt. Lett. 21, 24 (1996). M. Kagami, T. Yamashita, and H. Ito, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 1079 (2001). K. Dorkenoo, O. Crégut, L. Mager, and F. Gillot, Opt. Lett. 27, 1782 (2002). S. Jradi, O. Soppera, and D. J. Lougnot, Appl. Opt. 47, 3987 (2008). T. M. Monro, C. M. de Sterke, and L. Poladian, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 13, 2824 (1996). E. Fazio, M. Alonzo, F. Devaux, A. Toncelli, N. Argiolas, M. Bazzan, C. Sada, and M. Chauvet, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 091107 (2010). T. Yoshimura, J. Roman, Y. Takahashi, W. V. Wang, M. Inao, T. Ishitsuka, K. Tsukamoto, K. Motoyoshi, and W. Sotoyama, in Proceedings of 50th Electronic Components & Technology Conference (IEEE, 2000), pp. 962–969. T. Yoshimura and H. Kaburagi, Appl. Phys. Express 1, 062007 (2008). T. Yoshimura and M. Seki, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30, 1643 (2013). M. Seki and T. Yoshimura, Opt. Eng. 51, 074601 (2012). H. Nawata, in IEEE CPMT Symposium Japan (IEEE, 2013), pp. 121–124. T. Sato, Proc. SPIE 7944, 79440M (2011).
OPTICS LETTERS / Vol. 39, No. 12 / June 15, 2014
Self-aligned optical couplings by self-organized waveguides toward luminescent targets in organic/inorganic hybrid materials Tetsuzo Yoshimura,1,* Makoto Iida,1 and Hideyuki Nawata2 1 2
Tokyo University of Technology, 1404-1 Katakura, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0982, Japan
Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd., 3-7-1 Kanda-Nishiki-Cho, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo 101-0054, Japan *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received March 11, 2014; revised April 9, 2014; accepted April 16, 2014; posted April 18, 2014 (Doc. ID 207951); published June 6, 2014
Self-organization of optical waveguides is observed between two opposed optical fibers placed in a photosensitive organic/inorganic hybrid material, Sunconnect. A luminescent target containing coumarin 481 was deposited onto the edge of one of the two fibers at the core. When a 448-nm write beam was introduced from the other fiber, the write beam and the luminescence from the photoexcited target increased the refractive index of Sunconnect to induce self-focusing. Traces of waveguides were seen to grow from the cores of both fibers and merged into a single self-aligned optical coupling between the fibers. This optical solder functionality enabled increases in both coupling efficiency and tolerance to lateral misalignment of the fibers. © 2014 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (260.5950) Self-focusing; (130.5460) Polymer waveguides; (200.4650) Optical interconnects. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.003496
Because optical interconnects are promising technologies for overcoming bottlenecks in computing [1] such as clock rates, input/output counts, and cooling, there has been considerable research on the implementation of optical wiring into computers [2–8]. One of the challenges of using optical interconnects is the difficulty of creating optical couplings between optical devices. Although edge coupling [9] and grating coupling [10] techniques have been developed, these require precise alignment at a number of coupling points, raising the system cost. To solve this, we propose an optical coupling technique based on a self-organized lightwave network (SOLNET), which makes use of self-focusing between write beams in photoinduced refractive-index increase (PRI) materials such as photopolymers. Optical waveguide formation in photopolymers was first reported by Frisken [11]. A self-written waveguide was formed by the emission of a write beam from an optical fiber core into a photopolymer. Further research work has since been conducted in this field using photopolymers [12–15], glasses [16], and photorefractive crystals [17]. Meanwhile, in SOLNET [18], an attractive force between a plurality of write beams in PRI materials is utilized. This allows construction of self-aligned optical waveguides between misaligned optical devices and operates as an optical solder. A simplified SOLNET fabrication process has also been developed as reflectiveSOLNET (R-SOLNET), which uses reflecting elements such as mirrors and wavelength filters [19]. Recently, the use of R-SOLNET with luminescent targets was proposed and was demonstrated both theoretically [20] and experimentally [21]. In R-SOLNET using a luminescent target, optical devices such as optical fibers, waveguides, laser diodes, light modulators, tunable wavelength filters, or photodetectors are placed into a PRI material as shown in Fig. 1. The PRI material is typically based on a photopolymer, photosensitive glass, or photorefractive crystal with a 0146-9592/14/123496-04$15.00/0
refractive index that increases upon write beam exposure. A luminescent target is deposited at the active site of one of the optical devices. When a write beam is introduced into the PRI material from the other optical device, the luminescent target is excited by the write beam and generates luminescence. In the region where the write beam and the luminescent emission from the target overlap, the refractive index increases more rapidly than in the surrounding region. The write beam and the emission from the luminescent target interact and merge through a self-focusing effect that constructs a self-aligned optical coupling (R-SOLNET) between the optical devices. This occurs automatically, even where misalignment and core size mismatch exist between the optical devices. Although the luminescent target remains permanently attached to the optical device, signal beams with wavelengths in the near-infrared region can propagate through the target where its absorbance is low. In a previous study on R-SOLNET using luminescent targets, three issues were found. A first issue was the poor transparency of the luminescent target used.
Optical Device
Luminescent Write Beam Luminescence Target
(1) PRI Material
(2) R-SOLNET
Self-Focusing
(3) Fig. 1.
(4) Concept of R-SOLNET with luminescent targets.
© 2014 Optical Society of America
June 15, 2014 / Vol. 39, No. 12 / OPTICS LETTERS
Absorption: Sunconnect
Photoluminescence (Excitation at 448 nm): Coumarin 481/Sunconnect 1
1 405
448
0.5
0.5
0
400
500 Wavelength (nm)
600
0
Luminescence Intensity (arb. units)
Absorbance (arb. units)
Because tris(8-hydroxyquinolinato)aluminum (Alq3) powder dispersed in polyvinyl alcohol was used for the target, the probe beams were scattered by the powder dispersed in the structure. This prevented us from measuring the coupling efficiency. A second issue was the balance of the sensitivity of the PRI material to different wavelengths of light. The photopolymer (a composite of Norland Optical Adhesive NOA65 and NOA81) used in the previous experiments had a high sensitivity in the ultraviolet region, decreasing at longer wavelengths. When a 405-nm write beam and an Alq3-containing target, having peak luminescence ∼500 nm, were used, a large wavelength separation of ∼95 nm existed between the write beam and the luminescence. The sensitivity to the luminescence was therefore very low compared with that to the write beam, reducing the targeting effect of the Alq3 target. A third issue was stability of the PRI material. Norland Optical Adhesive is not a typical material for optical waveguides, but an adhesive. It is preferable to use an optical waveguide material with better long-term stability for the R-SOLNET to improve the durability of R-SOLNET used with optical waveguides in optical interconnects. In this Letter, we fabricated nonscattering luminescent targets located at the core edges of the optical fibers. The luminescent targets contained the dye coumarin 481, which has a luminescence peak at 470 nm. A 448-nm light source was used for write beams to reduce the wavelength separation between the write beam and the luminescence to ∼22 nm. These conditions enabled us to measure coupling efficiency between optical fibers connected by R-SOLNET and reduce the sensitivity imbalance between the write beam and the luminescence. For the PRI material, a novel photosensitive organic/ inorganic hybrid material, Sunconnect, was used. The refractive index of Sunconnect increases from ∼1.59 to ∼1.60 through write beam exposure. Sunconnect was developed by Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd., as an optical waveguide material with long-term stability [22,23]. R-SOLNET experiments were performed using optical fibers with core diameters of ∼50 μm, denoted by 50-μm fiber, and ∼10 μm, denoted by 10-μm fiber. The former was an ordinary graded-index multimode fiber and the latter a single-mode fiber. To enhance the targeting effect, the sensitivity of the PRI material to the luminescence should be comparable with, or higher than, that to the write beam. As Fig. 2 shows, in Sunconnect the absorption spectrum has a
Fig. 2. Absorption spectrum of Sunconnect and photoluminescence spectrum of the coumarin 481/Sunconnect luminescent target excited by the write beam at 448 nm.
3497
peak in the ultraviolet region, and the absorbance decreases at longer wavelengths, indicating that the sensitivity decreases at longer wavelengths. The photoluminescence spectrum of Sunconnect containing coumarin 481, which is used as the luminescent target, has a peak around 470 nm. Then, for a 405-nm write beam, the wavelength separation is 65 nm, and for a 448-nm write beam, the wavelength separation is 22 nm. The 448-nm write beam is therefore preferable for reducing the sensitivity imbalance. Figure 3 shows optical waveguides grown from 50-μm fibers in Sunconnect. The refractive index contrast between the core and cladding is expected to be ∼1.60∕1.59. The write beam power required to form a 1.5-mm-long optical waveguide is almost two orders of magnitude larger for the write beam wavelength, λw , of 448 nm than for λw of 405 nm. This can be attributed to the lower absorbance of Sunconnect at 448 nm as shown in Fig. 2. In Fig. 3 a straight waveguide is shown that was formed using the 448-nm write beam. A nonuniform widened waveguide was formed for the 405-nm write beam. This difference can be explained in terms of the differing write beam absorption in the PRI material as indicted in Fig. 4. If there is large write beam absorption, the write beam may propagate only a short distance and form a short waveguide. After the waveguide formation has taken place, the absorbance in the waveguide region decreases because of decomposition of the sensitizers so that another stage of waveguide formation can start. By repeating this process, a long waveguide is formed in a stepwise manner. This may result in nonuniformity of the waveguide shape. Conversely, for small write beam absorption, the write beam can propagate over a longer distance, allowing uniform self-focusing to occur. This results in the formation of a straight waveguide with λW : 405 nm, Power: 1 µW
(a)
500 µm
λW : 448 nm, Power: 40 µW
(b)
tW: 120 s
tW: 45 s
500 µm
Fig. 3. Optical waveguides grown from 50-μm fibers in Sunconnect by write beams with wavelengths of (a) 405 nm and (b) 448 nm.
Write Beam Absorption Large
Small
Fig. 4. Schematic of the influence of write beam absorption in PRI materials on waveguide shape.
3498
OPTICS LETTERS / Vol. 39, No. 12 / June 15, 2014 Coumarin 481/Sunconnect
Optical Fiber
50-µm Fiber
tW=15 s
20 s
Core Cured Region
UV Light 200 µm
Luminescent Target
(a)
Luminescent Target
Etching
40 s
50 s
50-µm Fiber
Luminescent Target 200 µm
(b)
Fig. 5. (a) Illustration of the process for luminescent target fabrication at the core edge of a fiber. (b) Photograph of a luminescent target under excitation at 448 nm.
a more uniform shape. Low absorbance of the PRI material is also desirable for the formation of R-SOLNET using luminescent targets because the write beam can reach the target without attenuation by the medium so that strong luminescence can be generated. To deposit a luminescent target onto the core of an optical fiber, we used the process shown in Fig. 5(a). The fiber edge was coated by coumarin 481 dissolved in Sunconnect at concentration of ∼0.1 wt:%. The coating was exposed to ultraviolet light from the fiber core, which cured the region just on the core. The luminescent target was obtained by wet etching the coating to remove the noncured part using a mixture of isopropyl alcohol/ 4-methyl-2-pentanone. Figure 5(b) shows a photograph of a luminescent target emitting luminescence by excitation at 448 nm. Figure 6 shows an R-SOLNET grown between a 50-μm fiber core and the edge of an opposite fiber in Sunconnect. The fiber-to-fiber distance, L, is 250 μm, and the lateral misalignment, d, is 30 μm. A 405-nm write beam is introduced from the fiber on the left. The trace of the waveguide induced by the write beam grows from the left-hand side. Another trace of the waveguide, induced by light reflected from the edge of the right-hand-side fiber, also develops. The two traces finally merge to form the R-SOLNET. µm Fiber 50-µ
200 µm
tW=5 s
15 s
As shown in Fig. 6, emission from the luminescent target is not observed. Consequently the luminescent target does not have an effect on R-SOLNET formation. The absence of luminescence is explained as follows. Because the sensitivity of Sunconnect is relatively high at 405 nm, as shown in Fig. 2, the 405-nm write beam can be of a low power for SOLNET formation. This power is not sufficient to induce observable luminescence from the target. Figure 7 shows an R-SOLNET grown between a 50-μm fiber core and a luminescent target on a 50-μm fiber core edge in Sunconnect. The two fibers are placed at L of 250 μm and d of 20 μm. A 448-nm write beam is introduced from the fiber on the left. Bright blue luminescence from the target is observed. As write beam irradiation progresses, the trace of waveguide growth from the core of the fiber on the left can be observed. At the same time, the trace of waveguide growth from the luminescent target on the right is observed, which is induced by luminescence from the target. The two traces finally merge into a single waveguide and form an R-SOLNET based on a luminescent target. Figure 8 shows an R-SOLNET grown between a 10-μm fiber core and a luminescent target on a 10-μm fiber core edge, induced by a 448-nm write beam introduced from the left-hand fiber. Luminescence from the target is observed, and the trace of waveguide growth from the fiber on the left and another trace of waveguide growth from the luminescent target are observed. The two traces 10-µ µm Fiber
100 µm
Luminescent Target 20 s
Fig. 7. Photograph showing an R-SOLNET grown between a 50-μm fiber core and a luminescent target on a 50-μm fiber core edge in Sunconnect by a 448-nm (20 μW) write beam for L 250 μm and d 20 μm.
30 s
tW=3 s
10 s
Luminescent Target 20 s
30 s
Reflection
Fig. 6. Photograph showing an R-SOLNET grown between a 50-μm fiber core and the edge of an opposing fiber in Sunconnect by a 405-nm (100 nW) write beam for L 250 μm and d 30 μm.
Fig. 8. Photograph showing an R-SOLNET grown between a 10-μm fiber core and a luminescent target on a 10-μm fiber core edge in Sunconnect by a 448-nm (20 μW) write beam for L 190 μm and d 9 μm.
June 15, 2014 / Vol. 39, No. 12 / OPTICS LETTERS 100
Coupling Efficiency (%)
After R-SOLNET Formation 80
2.
60
40
Before R-SOLNET Formation
4.
20
0
3.
L: 300 µm λProbe: 856 nm 0
10
20 Lateral Misalignment, d (µm)
30
Fig. 9. Coupling efficiency between 50-μm fibers connected by R-SOLNET with luminescent targets.
finally merge into a single R-SOLNET. We show that an R-SOLNET can be formed between 10-μm fibers as well as between 50-μm fibers. The coupling efficiency was measured between the 50-μm fibers connected by R-SOLNET with luminescent targets for an L of 300 μm. The probe beam wavelength, λProbe , was 856 nm. As Fig. 9 shows, the coupling efficiency decreases with the lateral misalignment between the fibers. Using R-SOLNET the coupling efficiency increases by 10%–30%. The use of R-SOLNET also increases tolerance to lateral misalignment. These results indicate that R-SOLNET with luminescent targets has potential to realize the functions of an optical solder for in-plane couplings and, in principle, for surfacenormal couplings such as couplings between waveguide gratings and optical fibers. However, the efficiency of the R-SOLNET coupling (∼80%) remains limited, which might be attributed to nonoptimized luminescent target structures. The target shape and reproducibility of target formation may be improved by optimization of the fabrication processes in our future work. Furthermore, coupling efficiency between 10-μm fibers will be evaluated. In conclusion, we demonstrate self-aligned optical couplings between 50-μm fibers and between 10-μm fibers using R-SOLNET, where the optical waveguides self-organize based on luminescent targets. A novel organic/inorganic hybrid material, Sunconnect, which was developed as a material for optical waveguides, was used as the PRI material. To enhance the targeting effect, adjustment of the sensitivity balance was attempted by using 448-nm write beams and coumarin481-containing luminescent targets. R-SOLNET was found to widen the tolerance to the lateral misalignment between optical fibers, indicating that it could potentially function as an optical solder. References 1. D. A. B. Miller, “How large a system can we build without optics?” Workshop Notes, 8th Annual Workshop on
5.
6. 7. 8.
9.
10.
11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.
18.
19. 20. 21. 22. 23.
3499
Interconnections within High Speed Digital Systems, Santa Fe, New Mexico, May 12, 1997, Lecture 1.2. N. M. Jokerst, M. A. Brooke, S. Cho, S. Wilkinson, M. Vrazel, S. Fike, J. Tabler, Y. J. Joo, S. Seo, D. S. Wils, and A. Brown, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 9, 350 (2003). C. Choi, L. Lin, Y. Liu, J. Choi, L. Wang, D. Haas, J. Magera, and R. T. Chen, J. Lightwave Technol. 22, 2168 (2004). E. Bosman, J. Missinne, B. V. Hoe, G. V. Steenberge, S. Kalathimekkad, J. V. Erps, I. Milenkov, K. Panajotov, T. V. Gijseghem, P. Dubruel, H. Thienpont, and P. V. Daele, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 17, 617 (2011). F. E. Doany, C. L. Schow, B. G. Lee, R. Budd, C. Baks, R. Dangel, R. John, F. Libsch, J. A. Kash, B. Chan, H. Lin, C. Carver, J. Huang, J. Berry, and D. Bajkowski, in Proceedings of 61st Electronic Components & Technology Conference (IEEE, 2011), pp. 790–797. R. Nair, T. Gu, and M. W. Haney, in IEEE Optical Interconnects Conference (IEEE, 2012), pp. 18–19. X. Lin, A. Hosseini, X. Dou, H. Subbaraman, and R. T. Chen, Opt. Express 21, 60 (2013). T. Yoshimura, Y. Takahashi, M. Inao, M. Lee, W. Chou, S. Beilin, W. V. Wang, J. Roman, and T. Massingill, “Systems based on opto-electronic substrates with electrical and optical interconnections and methods for making,” U.S. patent 6,343,171 (January 29, 2002). F. E. Doany, B. G. Lee, S. N. Assefa, W. M. J. Green, M. Yang, C. L. Schow, C. V. Jahnes, S. Zhang, J. Singer, V. I. Kopp, J. A. Kash, and Y. A. Vlasov, J. Lightwave Technol. 29, 475 (2011). A. Mekis, S. Gloeckner, G. Masini, A. Narasimha, T. Pinguet, S. Sahni, and P. D. Dobbelaere, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 17, 597 (2011). S. J. Frisken, Opt. Lett. 18, 1035 (1993). A. S. Kewitsch and A. Yariv, Opt. Lett. 21, 24 (1996). M. Kagami, T. Yamashita, and H. Ito, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 1079 (2001). K. Dorkenoo, O. Crégut, L. Mager, and F. Gillot, Opt. Lett. 27, 1782 (2002). S. Jradi, O. Soppera, and D. J. Lougnot, Appl. Opt. 47, 3987 (2008). T. M. Monro, C. M. de Sterke, and L. Poladian, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 13, 2824 (1996). E. Fazio, M. Alonzo, F. Devaux, A. Toncelli, N. Argiolas, M. Bazzan, C. Sada, and M. Chauvet, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 091107 (2010). T. Yoshimura, J. Roman, Y. Takahashi, W. V. Wang, M. Inao, T. Ishitsuka, K. Tsukamoto, K. Motoyoshi, and W. Sotoyama, in Proceedings of 50th Electronic Components & Technology Conference (IEEE, 2000), pp. 962–969. T. Yoshimura and H. Kaburagi, Appl. Phys. Express 1, 062007 (2008). T. Yoshimura and M. Seki, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30, 1643 (2013). M. Seki and T. Yoshimura, Opt. Eng. 51, 074601 (2012). H. Nawata, in IEEE CPMT Symposium Japan (IEEE, 2013), pp. 121–124. T. Sato, Proc. SPIE 7944, 79440M (2011).
