AAC Accepted Manuscript Posted Online 18 May 2015 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/AAC.00274-15 Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

1

In Vitro Activity of Dalbavancin Against Drug Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from a

2

Global Surveillance Program

3 4

Sandra P. McCurdy1#, Ronald N. Jones2, Rodrigo E. Mendes2, Sailaja Puttagunta1 and Michael W. Dunne1

5 6

1

Durata Therapeutics, a subsidiary of Actavis plc, Branford, Connecticut, USA

2

JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA

7 8

Running Title: Dalbavancin activity against drug-resistant S. aureus (Note)

9 10 11 12

#Corresponding Author: Mailing Address: 322 East Main Street, 3rd Floor Branford, CT 06405

13

Phone: 1-203-871-4629 E-mail: [email protected]

14

Text Word Count: 964

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

1

25

Abstract

26

In over a decade (2002-2012) of Staphylococcus aureus surveillance testing on 62,195 isolates,

27

dalbavancin was demonstrated to be active against isolates that were either susceptible or non-

28

susceptible to daptomycin-, linezolid- and tigecycline. Nearly all (99.8%) of multidrug-resistant

29

methicillin-resistant S. aureus were inhibited by dalbavancin at ≤0.12 µg/ml (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.06

30

µg/ml), the current United States Food and Drug Administration (USA-FDA) breakpoint.

31

Overall, only 0.35% of the monitored S. aureus had a dalbavancin MIC at either 0.25 or 0.5

32

µg/ml (non-susceptible).

33 34

Keywords: Dalbavancin, S. aureus, Resistance

35

2

36

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of bacterial infections worldwide including skin and

37

soft tissue infections, bacteremia, pneumonia, endocarditis and osteomyelitis (1). Due to its

38

propensity to evolve and adapt to its host and applied treatments, S. aureus has been able to

39

acquire resistance to antimicrobial agents from penicillin in 1942 to methicillin in 1961, and in

40

more recent years to compounds such as vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin (2,3).

41

Dalbavancin was recently approved by the USA-FDA for the treatment of acute bacterial skin

42

and skin structure infections caused by Gram-positive organisms in adults (4). Dalbavancin is a

43

semi-synthetic lipoglycopeptide structurally related to teicoplanin. Its mechanism of action

44

involves the interruption of cell wall synthesis by binding to the terminal D-alanyl-D-alanine of

45

the stem peptide in nascent cell wall peptidoglycan, thereby preventing cross-linking

46

(transpeptidation and transglycosylation) of disaccharide subunits. This disruption of the cell

47

wall results in bacterial cell death (5). To date, resistance to dalbavancin is limited to intrinsic

48

glycopeptide –resistant species and to organisms expressing the VanA phenotype of acquired

49

resistance. Dalbavancin’s potent in vitro activity has been substantiated in various animal

50

models of infection and it possesses a pharmacokinetic (PK) profile which allows once-weekly

51

intravenous (IV) dosing (4,6). The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro activity of

52

dalbavancin against S. aureus isolates non-susceptible (NS) to three relatively recently

53

introduced antimicrobial agents (daptomycin, linezolid and tigecycline) to treat S. aureus

54

infections.

55

More than 60,000 isolates from non-duplicate clinical specimens were collected during routine

56

worldwide surveillance programs between 2002 and 2012. Isolates were collected from 104 sites

57

from the US and 66 sites in the European (Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece,

58

Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, 3

59

Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom and Ukraine), Russian and Israeli regions. Isolates were

60

recovered from blood (9,470 isolates, 15.2%), skin and soft tissue (18,764; 30.2%), respiratory

61

tract (9,015; 14.5%), urinary tract (1,175, 1.9%) and other or undetermined infection sources

62

(23,771; 38.2%) as part of the SENTRY surveillance program (JMI Laboratories, North Liberty,

63

IA, USA).

64

Resistance phenotypes (non-susceptible or resistant) for daptomycin and linezolid were based

65

upon Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints (7), while USA-FDA

66

breakpoints were applied for dalbavancin (3 drug classes (10).

74

Table 1 shows the activity of dalbavancin and comparator agents tested against the daptomycin-

75

NS, linezolid-R and tigecycline-NS isolates. Dalbavancin was active when tested against the

76

daptomycin-NS isolates with MIC50/90 values of 0.06/0.12 µg/mL. By comparison, the MIC50/90

77

for vancomycin against these isolates was 2/2 µg/mL, i.e. 16 to 32- fold higher. At the current

78

USA-FDA breakpoint, 91.9% of isolates with a daptomycin-NS phenotype would be categorized

79

as susceptible to dalbavancin. However, against daptomycin-NS/vancomycin susceptible

80

isolates, the susceptibility would increase to 97.1% (data not shown). The MIC50/90 for

81

dalbavancin against linezolid-R S. aureus was 0.06/0.12 µg/mL, and for vancomycin the 4

82

MIC50/90 was 1/2 µg/mL, again 16-fold higher. Against tigecycline-NS isolates, the MIC50/90 for

83

dalbavancin was 0.06/0.06 µg/mL, and for vancomycin the MIC50/90 was 1/2 µg/mL.

84

Dalbavancin, daptomycin, linezolid and vancomycin exhibited 100.0% susceptibility rates

85

against these isolates, while 26.3% showed susceptibility to clindamycin.

86

Dalbavancin and selected comparators tested against a more recent collection of MRSA isolates

87

with an MDR phenotype (surveillance years 2010-2012) (Table 1), demonstrated dalbavancin

88

activity (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.06 µg/ml) and a 99.8% overall susceptibility rate. This activity was

89

comparable to that observed for daptomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, and vancomycin (99.8-

90

100.0%).

91

In the present study, dalbavancin demonstrated potent activity against S. aureus isolates

92

characterized as daptomycin-NS, linezolid-R and tigecycline-NS when applying current CSLI

93

and USA-FDA breakpoints (4,7,8). Dalbavancin demonstrated activity that was similar to

94

comparator agents against 1,484 MRSA isolates with MDR phenotype. In the recently

95

completed dalbavancin clinical trials (DISCOVER 1 and DISCOVER 2), there were no S. aureus

96

isolates that had a dalbavancin MIC results at >0.25 µg/mL and only two isolates that had an

97

MIC of 0.25 µg/mL out of 511 isolates tested (6). One patient with an S. aureus isolate with a

98

dalbavancin MIC of 0.25 µg/mL was treated successfully with that drug. More clinical data

99

from patients with S. aureus isolates at this MIC level would be informative, but may be

100

challenging to generate given the scarcity of this phenotype in clinical practice. In over ten years

101

of dalbavancin surveillance testing, only 0.35% of S. aureus isolates were encountered that

102

exceeded the current USA-FDA susceptible breakpoint of 2

≤0.03-0.5 1-4 0.5-4 ≤0.03-0.25 ≤0.06->2

91.9 94.6 100.0 100.0 43.2

Linezolid-R (19)

Dalbavancin Vancomycin

0.06 1

0.12 2

≤0.03-0.12 0.5-2

100.0 100.0

9

MIC (µg/ml) 90% Range 0.06 2

≤0.03-0.12 0.5-2 0.25-0.5 1-2 2

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 26.3

MRSA (5,167)d MDR (1,484)

Dalbavancin Dalbavancin Vancomycin Daptomycin Linezolid Tigecyclinee

0.06 0.06 1 0.25 1 0.12

0.06 0.06 1 0.5 1 0.25

≤0.03-0.25 ≤0.03-0.25

In Vitro Activity of Dalbavancin against Drug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from a Global Surveillance Program.

In over a decade (2002 to 2012) of Staphylococcus aureus surveillance testing on 62,195 isolates, dalbavancin was demonstrated to be active against is...
399KB Sizes 0 Downloads 11 Views

Recommend Documents