MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
Available at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/modo
Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling Guolun Wang a,d,1, Xiaofang Tang b,1, Yujie Chen a,d, Jun Cao c, Qinzhu Huang c, Xuemei Ling c, Wenyan Ren a,d, Songqing Liu a,d, Yihui Wu a, Lorraine Ray b, Xinhua Lin a,b,* a
State Key Laboratory of Biomembrane and Membrane Biotechnology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA c Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China d Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China b
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Hedgehog (Hh) acts as a morphogen to activate the transcription of diverse target genes via
Received 6 March 2014
its downstream effector Cubitus interruptus (Ci). Currently, it is less understood how Ci
Received in revised form
recruits co-factors to activate transcription. Here we report that hyperplastic discs (hyd), an
14 April 2014
E3 ubiquitin ligase, can differentially regulate the transcriptional outputs of Hh signaling.
Accepted 6 May 2014
We show that loss of Hyd activity caused upregulation of some, but not all of Hh target genes.
Available online xxxx
Importantly, Hyd does not affect the stability of Ci. Our data suggest that Hyd differentially restrains the transcriptional activity of Ci via selective association with respective
Keywords:
promoters.
Drosophila
Ó 2014 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Hedgehog Hyperplastic discs Ubiquitination Transcription
1.
Introduction
Morphogens are secreted signaling molecules which form a concentration gradient and induce distinct cellular responses in a concentration-dependent manner. The roles of morphogen molecules in coordinating growth and patterning are reflected by the time- and tissue-specific control of the transcription of a variety of target genes. The Hh family of proteins are well-studied morphogen molecules which serve as global organizers to control tissue growth and patterning during metazoan development (Ingham and McMahon, 2001;
Ingham et al., 2011). The role of Hh as a morphogen in development is particularly well illustrated during wing disc development (Vervoort, 2000; Mullor et al., 1997; Strigini and Cohen, 1997). The larval wing imaginal disc, which finally gives rise to the adult wing blade after metamorphosis, is subdivided into distinctive anterior (A) and posterior (P) compartments. Hh expressed in the P compartment moves anteriorly to transduce its signal in a narrow stripe in the A compartment abutting the A/P boundary (Tabata and Kornberg, 1994). Hh signaling induces the localized expression of a number of target genes including decapentaplegic (dpp), patched (ptc),
* Corresponding author at: Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Tel.: +1 513 636 2144; fax: +1 513 6364317. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (X. Lin). 1 These authors contributed equally to this work. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002 0925-4773/Ó 2014 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
2
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
collier (col, also known as knot) and engrailed (en) in a concentration-dependant manner (Strigini and Cohen, 1997; Chen and Struhl, 1996; Vervoort et al., 1999; Zecca et al., 1995). Hedgehog signaling is subject to regulation at multiple levels (Di Marcotullio et al., 2007; Wang and Holmgren, 1999). These levels converge to control the stability and activity of the DNA binding protein, Ci (Smelkinson et al., 2007; Ou et al., 2002). Full-length Ci (Ci-155 or CiA) is the primary transcriptional mediator in response to Hh signaling. In the absence of Hh ligand, Ci is proteolytically processed into a shorter form (Ci-75 or CiR) that acts as a transcriptional repressor of target genes or is degraded by the proteasomes. Exposure of cells to Hh blocks the production of Ci-75 and stimulates the nuclear translocation and activation of Ci-155. Ci processing requires a complex for priming phosphorylation (Jia et al., 2002; Price and Kalderon, 2002), which is composed of the atypical kinesin protein Costal 2 (Cos2), the serine threonine kinase Fused (Fu), PKA, and the PEST domain protein Suppressor of fused (Sufu) Huangfu and Anderson, 2006. Ci phosphorylation results in the recruitment of the F-box protein Slimb/b-TRCP of the SCF ubiquitin ligase complex, which targets Ci for processing or proteasomedependent degradation (Ou et al., 2002; Smelkinson and Kalderon, 2006; Wang and Price, 2008). It is well established that Ci is the sole mediator in activating target transcription, but the detailed mechanisms underlying co-factor recruitment and differential target gene transcription remain elusive. It has been shown that the transcriptional co-activator CBP binds to Ci-155 but not Ci-75 and CBP is required for normal Hh signaling (Akimaru et al., 1997). In mammalian systems, Su(fu) can enter the nucleus accompanied by Ci to help inhibit target gene expression by recruiting SAP18, a component of the SMRT/Sin3 histone deacetylase (HDAC) co-repressor complex (Cheng and Bishop, 2002). In Drosophila, genetic impairment of hyrax (hyx) decreased the expression of the high-threshold Hh target gene col/knot, but not other targets, suggesting that differential regulation of Ci-dependent transcription is subject to more complicated and elaborate controls (Mosimann et al., 2009). The ubiquitin ligase gene hyperplastic discs (hyd, the Drosophila homolog of UBR5, CG9484) has been reported to negatively regulate Hh signaling in eye and wing development, possibly through Ci ubiquitination and degradation (Lee et al., 2002). In this study we further investigated the roles of Hyd in Hh signaling using the Drosophila wing disc as the model system. We showed that loss of hyd function results in upregulated transcription of ptc and dpp without noticeable effect on en or col transcription. We demonstrated that the ubiquitin ligase activity is strictly required for Hyd’s function. Importantly, we found that neither over-expression nor knockout of hyd alters Ci stability. We propose a model in which Hyd, through ubiquitination, participates in Ci-dependent transactivation of Hh signaling at selective promoters.
2.
Results and discussion
In a genetic screen for ubiquitin ligases involved in Hh signaling, we uncovered the role of Hyd in regulating the ranscription of a subset of Hh target genes (Fig. 1). Four Hh
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
targets have been examined, including ptc, dpp, en and col, either by anti-b-Galactosidase immunostaining for the reporters (ptc-lacZ Chen and Struhl, 1996 and dpp-lacZ (Blackman et al., 1991)) or by direct antibody staining against the gene product (En, Col and Ptc). As revealed by Hyd antibody staining, Hyd expression is not detectable in wing disc cells either homozygous for the null allele hyd15, or expressing hyd RNAi (Figs. 1A00 , B00 , C00 , 3A00 and S1B 0 . Note that flies were from the same crosses in Figs. 1D–D00 and S1B–B00 ). While loss of hyd activities strongly enhanced the transcription of ptc and dpp in a cell-autonomous manner (Figs. 1A, B and 3A), the levels of Col and En remained unchanged (Figs. 1C, D and S4B). It is worth mentioning that the upregulated dpp and ptc transcription only occurs in the anterior cells in a manner that follows the Hh gradient, indicating that Hyd loss modifies the signaling strength in Hh-responsive cells, rather than inducing ectopic Hh activation in cells normally not responding to Hh signaling. Meanwhile, over-expression of hyd has no effect on the transcription of any of the four target genes (Fig. S2). Next we tested whether Hyd is generally involved in signal transduction. As shown in Figs. S1 and S5, Dpp signaling does not respond to any manipulation of Hyd activity, indicating that Hyd is not a general transcription factor in the wing disc. To determine the possible role of Hyd in Hh ligand production and distribution, we stained Hh protein in wing discs expressing hyd RNAi in the dorsal compartment. No change was observed on protein levels or gradient formation of the Hh ligand when Hyd activity is knocked down (Fig. 1D 0 ). Taken together with the nuclear localization revealed by antibody staining (Fig. S1), these data argue that hyd is selectively involved in the regulation of specific Hh target genes by a nuclear process downstream of ligand reception. Previously, Lee et al. (2002) reported that Ci levels were upregulated in hyd mutant clones, and thus they proposed a model that hyd acts by targeting Ci for degradation. Our studies provided several lines of evidence against that Ci is the direct target of hyd. First, the alteration of Ci levels cannot explain the differential regulation of hh targets by hyd. Second, while we did observe similar changes in Ci distribution upon hyd loss in some cases, these changes only occurred in cells with disrupted morphology, and should therefore be considered as a secondary effect. In cells which are morphologically normal, as shown in Figs. 2A–A000 , B–B000 and S4A–A 0 , Ci levels are not subject to any alteration by Hyd impairment or disruption. Furthermore, our epistasis analysis showed that loss of Ci function eliminated all transcriptional output of Hh signaling even in cells with reduced Hyd activity (Fig. 2C–E000 ), suggesting that Hyd acts upstream of, or in parallel to, Ci in Hh signaling. Hyd and its homologs belong to the HECT family of E3 ubiquitin ligases. Several substrates have been identified for the HECT domain activity of Hyd’s mammalian homologs (Honda et al., 2002; Jung et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013; McDonald et al., 2014; Jiang et al., 2011; Cojocaru et al., 2011). To characterize the role of the HECT domain of Hyd in Hh signaling, we generated a HECT domain mutated form of Hyd by converting the catalytic cysteine at aa2854 to serine (HydCS) Metzger et al., 2012. When expressed in cells deficient in endogenous hyd, wild-type Hyd can completely
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
3
Fig. 1 – Hyd selectively controls the transcription of Hh target genes. All the wing discs presented in this and other figures were derived from third instar larvae with anterior oriented to the left and dorsal up. (A–A000 , C–C000 ) wing discs with clones of cells (CD8-GFP positive) over-expressing hyd RNAi under the control of actin-Gal4. (B–B000 ) a wing disc with clones of cells (CD8-GFP negative) carrying homozygous hyd15 allele. (D–D00 ) a wing disc over-expressing hyd RNAi under the control of ap-Gal4 in the dorsal compartment with the lines marking the dorsal–ventral boundary. The efficacy of RNAi-mediated knockdown in D–D00 is confirmed in Fig. S1. With lost or reduced hyd activity, expression of ptc-lacZ (ptcZ) and dpp-lacZ (dppZ) is upregulated, while no notable change is observed for the expression of Col, En and Hh. The gradient of Hh and En also remains normal upon RNAi-mediated knockdown of hyd. Scale bar, 50 lm.
rescue the upregulation of ptc transcription from lossfunction of hyd (Fig. 3B–B000 ) while C2854S mutation renders it incapable of rescuing elevated ptc levels, arguing that the E3 ligase activity of Hyd is required for its role in Hh signaling. Interestingly, over-expression of hydCS does not affect Ci accumulation or hh signaling activity as shown in Fig. S3, further arguing against that Ci is the direct target for the E3 ligase activity of Hyd. HECT domain-mediated ubiquitination of proteins has been reported to regulate numerous biological processes
through affecting the trafficking, function, and stability of respective substrates (Tanno and Komada, 2013). We further examined whether ubiquitination-mediated degradation is involved in the regulation of Hh signaling by Hyd. In this assay, cultured wing discs were treated either with DMSO control or with MG132 in DMSO, which can effectively block the proteasome-dependent degradation of ubiquitinated proteins. Indeed, treatment with MG132 resulted in dramatic accumulation of Ci uniformly in the anterior compartment (Fig. 3, compare E00 –D00 ) leading to a generally enhanced and expanded ptc
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
4
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
Fig. 2 – hyd controls Ci-dependent transcription without affecting Ci stability. (A–A000 ) In hyd15 clones (GFP negative), Ci levels remain unchanged. (B–B000 ) In V5Hyd over-expressing clones (CD8-GFP positive), Ci levels are unaltered. (C–E000 ) CD8-GFP marks cells co-expressing ci RNAi and hyd RNAi. When both Ci and Hyd are knocked down, the expression of Col, ptc-lacZ and dpp-lacZ is all eliminated. Scale bar, 50 lm.
transcription domain (Fig. 3, compare E–D). However, loss of hyd function caused a further increase in both the level and the range of ptc transcription in the already elevated background (Fig. 3E), again arguing against the previous hypothesis
that Hyd acts on Ci degradation. In addition, we failed to detect any change in Ci ubiquitination in cultured cells when Hyd or HydCS is expressed (Fig. S6), suggesting that Ci is not the direct target for the E3 ligase activity of Hyd.
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
5
Fig. 3 – hyd controls Hh signaling in an E3 activity-dependent manner. (A–C000 ) Genetic rescue experiments using MARCM system. Over-expression of V5hyd (B–B000 ) but not the E3-dead form V5hydCS (C–C000 ) can block the upregulated expression of Ptc in hyd15 clones (CD8-GFP positive). (D–E000 ) wing discs with clones of cells (CD8-GFP positive) over-expressing actin-Gal4driven hyd RNAi were dissected and cultured in M3 medium containing DMSO (D–D000 ) or MG132 (100 lM) for up to 6 h before immunostaining. MG132 treatment caused a uniform anterior accumulation of Ci (E00 ) while it does not block the upregulation of ptc-lacZ in hyd RNAi clones (CD8-GFP positive). Scale bar, 50 lm.
To further investigate how Hyd regulates the transcriptional activity of Ci, we examined the physical
interaction between these two proteins. Intriguingly, both the full-length Ci and CiM (aa 440-1160) were found to interact
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
6
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
with Flag-tagged Hyd in cultured S2 cells while CiN (aa1-450) and CiC (aa1161-1377a) both of which lack the DNA-binding zinc finger domain failed to do so (Fig. 4A and B). This result provided the molecular basis for the specific role of Hyd in restraining the signaling strength under Hh activation. Next we asked how Hyd functions in a target gene-restricted manner. One simple explanation would be that Hyd is selectively associated with different target genes. To test the hypothesis,
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
we checked whether hyd is selectively enriched for the seven target genes of Hh and Dpp signaling with ChIP coupled real time PCR, and we also incorporate the house-keeping gene, rp49 as a control. In support of the hypothesis, the ChIPPCR results with cultured cells indicated that hyd is only enriched around the transcription start site (TSS) of ptc and dpp promoters at a ratio of 0.7% and 0.5% respectively in both S2 and Clone 8 cells, while the enrichment for en and col
Fig. 4 – hyd selectively associates with promoters of hh targets. (A) Co-immunoprecipitation (IP) assays in clone 8 cells. IB: immunoblot. Hyd is found in a complex with Ci but not CiN. (B) Co-immunoprecipitation (IP) assays in clone 8 cells. IB: immunoblot. Hyd is found in a complex with CiM but not CiN and CiC. * indicated the expressed bands of Myc CiM and CiN. (C) ChIP-PCR assays in cultured cells. Hyd selectively associates with the transcription start sites (TSSs) of Hh-responsive promoters in S2 cells. (D) ChIP-PCR assays in cultured cells. Hyd does not associate with transcription start site (TSS) of dpp responsive promoters in Clone 8 cells. Error bars show the standard deviation (mean plus SD) of the ChIP PCR reactions performed in triplicate. * indicates statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) calculated by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test.
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
promoters is less than 0.2% (Fig. 4 C and D, Fig. S7). Since S2 cells do not express Ci while Clone 8 cells have endogenous Ci expression, these results indicate that Hyd acts as a preexisting factor at selective promoters whose binding is independent from the presence of Ci. Moreover, in agreement with no participation in Dpp signaling, Hyd was not enriched at any of the dpp-responsive promoters examined here (Fig. S7). Based on the above results, we made the following conclusions: first, Hyd selectively restrains the maximal transcriptional activity of Ci for specific Hh target genes including dpp and ptc; second, this regulation absolutely requires the E3 ligase activity of Hyd; third, in regulating Hh signaling, Hyd does not act on the proteasome-mediated degradation of its substrate. Our findings strongly suggest that Ci recruits and assembles differential sets of transcriptional co-factors at respective target genes. Further studies are needed to identify the substrate for Hyd and to characterize the detailed process that Hyd is involved in Hh signaling. Previously, several Ci co-factors have been reported to affect Hh signaling in a target gene-restricted manner. The mediator complex subunits Skuld (Skd) and Kohtalo (Kto) are involved in controlling the transcription of cell affinity-regulating genes, yet not ptc and dpp (Janody et al., 2003). As one of the key components of the PAF1 complex, Hyx is a positive regulator of col transcription, yet does not affect ptc, dpp or en (Mosimann et al., 2009). Different target genes have distinctive requirements for the threshold of Hh signaling, with en and col for the high threshold, ptc for the intermediate, and dpp for the lowest. The role of Hyd to specifically restrict the transcriptional outputs of intermediate- to high-threshold target genes in Hh signaling provides a good example toward the question ‘how organisms achieve functional robustness and plasticity for morphogen signaling’. On one hand, the maintenance of a maximal transcriptional potential helps organisms resist to detrimental signaling over-activation in face of genetic and environmental perturbations, such as ectopic Ci activation in this case; on the other hand, differential control of a subset of target genes fine-tunes the sensitivity of cellular responses, conferring cells the flexibility to adapt to developmental dynamics. Altogether, our studies provide more insights into the mechanisms underlying the precise regulation of morphogen signaling.
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
7
shocks were performed for 60 min at 37 °C at second instar larval stage. RNAi lines targeting hyd, P(GD14227)v44676, P(GD14227)v44675 were obtained from Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center (VDRC). The ptc-lacZ and dpp-lacZ reporters are enhancer trap lines.
3.2.
Antibody production and purification
Hyd antibodies were generated by immunizing mouse and rabbit with affinity purified GST fusion antigenic fragments (aa570-670) in the vector pGEX-4T-1 from bacterial culture. To obtain purified antibody for CHIP assay, the same antigenic fragment was also subcloned into pET28 for His-tagged protein production. The His-tagged fragment was covalently crosslinked with the AminoLinkTM Coupling Resin and Immobilization Kit (44890, Thermo scientific). The His-tagged antigencoupled resin was then used to affinity purify the rabbit antiserum against hyd to produce a highly purified polyclonal antibody. The full length cDNA of Colier was cloned into the pGEX4T-1 and the protein was affinity purified with GST fusion resin from bacterial culture. The polyclonal mouse or rabbit a-Col antibody were prepared and the antibody was purified with the antigenic fragment according to standard protocols.
3.3.
Immunostaining
3.
Methods
Discs were dissected from wandering third instar larvae and immunofluorescence staining was carried out as previously described (Han et al., 2005). Briefly, larvae are dissected in cold PBS (pH7.4) and fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS for 15 min. Samples were then permeabilized in PBS + 0.1% Triton X-100 and blocked in 5% normal horse serum. Primary antibodies in 5% normal horse serum were incubated overnight at 4 °C or 2 h at RT. Primary antibodies used for the immunostainings were mouse or rabbit a-V5 (Life Technology), rabbit anti-pMad (1:200) (Cell Signaling), rabbit a-Spalt major (1:100), antihedgehog (1:40), and chicken a-lacZ (1:100). Mouse antipatched (DSHB), mouse anti-engrailed (DSHB), rat anti-Ci 2A1 (DSHB) were obtained from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB), University of Iowa, Department of Biological Sciences. Fluorophore conjugated secondary antibodies were from Jackson Immunoresearch. Confocal images were collected as single frames on a Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscope. MG132 (100 lM; Calbiochem) in M3 medium (Sigma) was used to treat wing discs for up to 6 h before immunostaining.
3.1.
Drosophila husbandry
3.4.
All crosses were reared using standard techniques at 25 °C. Flies were raised on standard cornmeal-yeast-agar Drosophila medium at 25 °C unless otherwise indicated. The EMS allele of hyd15 was obtained from Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC) and the allele was then recombined with P{FRT(whs)}2A P{neoFRT}82B for mosaic clone analysis. Mosaic clones are produced by cross of the recombined null allele with fly stock yw, hsflp; FRT82B Ubi-GFP/TM6B. MARCM clones are produced by crossing recombined null allele with fly stock yw, hsflp, UAS-CD8GFP; TubGal4 FRT82B TubGal80/TM6B. Flipout clones are produced by crossing RNAi with fly stock yw, hsflp/+; Act> y+> Gal4-UAS-CD8GFP/CyO; MKRS/TM6B. Heat
Plasmids and transgenes
Molecular cloning was performed in accordance with standard protocol. The cDNA of hyd is assembled from various fragments by synthetic methods, and detailed cloning procedures will be available on request. The mutation of cyteine to serine at aa2854 was introduced by Quickchange protocol, then substituted with the corresponding C terminal fragment of full length hyd cDNA and sequencing is used to confirm the replacement. The molecular cloning details are available on request. Hyd cDNA (WT) and the CS mutant were then subcloned into pUAST-attB-V5 for generation of transgenic flies according to standard protocol. The transgenic flies, UAS-V5-hyd and UAS-V5-hydC2854S, are generated according
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
8
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
to site-directed integration protocol and used for rescue analysis. Ci and its mutant plasmids were described previously (Zhang et al., 2006).
4.
Author contributions
G.W., X.T. designed the study, analyzed the data and wrote the paper, G.W., X.T., Y.Ch, J.C., Q.H., X.L., W.R., S.L. and Y.W. conducted experiments. L.R. provided insightful comments. X.L. designed, managed and supervised work and analyzed experiments.
Acknowledgements We thank Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center, the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB) and the Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center (VDRC) for fly stocks and antibodies. We thank Dr. Qing Zhang for plasmids encoding Ci and its mutants. This work was supported by Grants from National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB943901, 2011 CB943902 and 2011 CB943802), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31030049), Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Grant (XDA01010101), and NIH Grants (2R01GM063891 and 1R01GM087517).
Appendix A. Supplementary material Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.mod.2014.05.002.
R E F E R E N C E S
Ingham, P.W., McMahon, A.P., 2001. Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles. Genes Dev. 15 (23), 3059–3087. Ingham, P.W., Nakano, Y., Seger, C., 2011. Mechanisms and functions of Hedgehog signalling across the metazoa. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12 (6), 393–406. Vervoort, M., 2000. Hedgehog and wing development in Drosophila: a morphogen at work? BioEssays 22 (5), 460–468. Mullor, J.L. et al, 1997. Hedgehog activity, independent of decapentaplegic, participates in wing disc patterning. Development 124 (6), 1227–1237. Strigini, M., Cohen, S.M., 1997. A Hedgehog activity gradient contributes to AP axial patterning of the Drosophila wing. Development 124 (22), 4697–4705. Tabata, T., Kornberg, T.B., 1994. Hedgehog is a signaling protein with a key role in patterning Drosophila imaginal discs. Cell 76 (1), 89–102. Chen, Y., Struhl, G., 1996. Dual roles for patched in sequestering and transducing Hedgehog. Cell 87 (3), 553–563. Vervoort, M. et al, 1999. The COE transcription factor Collier is a mediator of short-range Hedgehog-induced patterning of the Drosophila wing. Curr. Biol. 9 (12), 632–639. Zecca, M., Basler, K., Struhl, G., 1995. Sequential organizing activities of engrailed, hedgehog and decapentaplegic in the Drosophila wing. Development 121 (8), 2265–2278.
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
Di Marcotullio, L. et al, 2007. Multiple ubiquitin-dependent processing pathways regulate hedgehog/gli signaling: implications for cell development and tumorigenesis. Cell Cycle 6 (4), 390–393. Wang, Q.T., Holmgren, R.A., 1999. The subcellular localization and activity of Drosophila cubitus interruptus are regulated at multiple levels. Development 126 (22), 5097–5106. Smelkinson, M.G., Zhou, Q., Kalderon, D., 2007. Regulation of CiSCFSlimb binding, Ci proteolysis, and hedgehog pathway activity by Ci phosphorylation. Dev. Cell 13 (4), 481–495. Ou, C.Y. et al, 2002. Distinct protein degradation mechanisms mediated by Cul1 and Cul3 controlling Ci stability in Drosophila eye development. Genes Dev. 16 (18), 2403–2414. Jia, J. et al, 2002. Shaggy/GSK3 antagonizes Hedgehog signalling by regulating Cubitus interruptus. Nature 416 (6880), 548–552. Price, M.A., Kalderon, D., 2002. Proteolysis of the Hedgehog signaling effector Cubitus interruptus requires phosphorylation by Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 and Casein Kinase 1. Cell 108 (6), 823–835. Huangfu, D., Anderson, K.V., 2006. Signaling from Smo to Ci/Gli: conservation and divergence of Hedgehog pathways from Drosophila to vertebrates. Development 133 (1), 3–14. Smelkinson, M.G., Kalderon, D., 2006. Processing of the Drosophila hedgehog signaling effector Ci-155 to the repressor Ci-75 is mediated by direct binding to the SCF component Slimb. Curr. Biol. 16 (1), 110–116. Wang, Y., Price, M.A., 2008. A unique protection signal in Cubitus interruptus prevents its complete proteasomal degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28 (18), 5555–5568. Akimaru, H. et al, 1997. Drosophila CBP is a co-activator of cubitus interruptus in hedgehog signalling. Nature 386 (6626), 735–738. Cheng, S.Y., Bishop, J.M., 2002. Suppressor of Fused represses Glimediated transcription by recruiting the SAP18-mSin3 corepressor complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (8), 5442– 5447. Mosimann, C., Hausmann, G., Basler, K., 2009. The role of Parafibromin/Hyrax as a nuclear Gli/Ci-interacting protein in Hedgehog target gene control. Mech. Dev. 126 (5–6), 394–405. Lee, J.D. et al, 2002. The ubiquitin ligase Hyperplastic discs negatively regulates hedgehog and decapentaplegic expression by independent mechanisms. Development 129 (24), 5697–5706. Blackman, R.K. et al, 1991. An extensive 3 0 cis-regulatory region directs the imaginal disk expression of decapentaplegic, a member of the TGF-beta family in Drosophila. Development 111 (3), 657–666. Honda, Y. et al, 2002. Cooperation of HECT-domain ubiquitin ligase hHYD and DNA topoisomerase II-binding protein for DNA damage response. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (5), 3599–3605. Jung, H.Y. et al, 2013. Dyrk2-associated EDD-DDB1-VprBP E3 ligase inhibits telomerase by TERT degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 288 (10), 7252–7262. Wang, X. et al, 2013. HIV-1 Vpr protein inhibits telomerase activity via the EDD-DDB1-VPRBP E3 ligase complex. J. Biol. Chem. 288 (22), 15474–15480. McDonald, W.J. et al, 2014. Progestin-inducible EDD E3 ubiquitin ligase binds to alpha4 phosphoprotein to regulate ubiquitination and degradation of protein phosphatase PP2Ac. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 382 (1), 254–261. Jiang, W. et al, 2011. Acetylation regulates gluconeogenesis by promoting PEPCK1 degradation via recruiting the UBR5 ubiquitin ligase. Mol. Cell 43 (1), 33–44.
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
Cojocaru, M. et al, 2011. Transcription factor IIS cooperates with the E3 ligase UBR5 to ubiquitinate the CDK9 subunit of the positive transcription elongation factor B. J. Biol. Chem. 286 (7), 5012–5022. Metzger, M.B., Hristova, V.A., Weissman, A.M., 2012. HECT and RING finger families of E3 ubiquitin ligases at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 125 (Pt 3), 531–537. Tanno, H., Komada, M., 2013. The ubiquitin code and its decoding machinery in the endocytic pathway. J. Biochem. 153 (6), 497–504.
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
9
Janody, F. et al, 2003. Two subunits of the Drosophila mediator complex act together to control cell affinity. Development 130 (16), 3691–3701. Han, C. et al, 2005. Drosophila glypicans Dally and Dally-like shape the extracellular Wingless morphogen gradient in the wing disc. Development 132 (4), 667–679. Zhang, Q. et al, 2006. A hedgehog-induced BTB protein modulates hedgehog signaling by degrading Ci/Gli transcription factor. Dev. Cell 10 (6), 719–729.
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
Available at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/modo
Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling Guolun Wang a,d,1, Xiaofang Tang b,1, Yujie Chen a,d, Jun Cao c, Qinzhu Huang c, Xuemei Ling c, Wenyan Ren a,d, Songqing Liu a,d, Yihui Wu a, Lorraine Ray b, Xinhua Lin a,b,* a
State Key Laboratory of Biomembrane and Membrane Biotechnology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA c Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China d Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China b
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Hedgehog (Hh) acts as a morphogen to activate the transcription of diverse target genes via
Received 6 March 2014
its downstream effector Cubitus interruptus (Ci). Currently, it is less understood how Ci
Received in revised form
recruits co-factors to activate transcription. Here we report that hyperplastic discs (hyd), an
14 April 2014
E3 ubiquitin ligase, can differentially regulate the transcriptional outputs of Hh signaling.
Accepted 6 May 2014
We show that loss of Hyd activity caused upregulation of some, but not all of Hh target genes.
Available online xxxx
Importantly, Hyd does not affect the stability of Ci. Our data suggest that Hyd differentially restrains the transcriptional activity of Ci via selective association with respective
Keywords:
promoters.
Drosophila
Ó 2014 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Hedgehog Hyperplastic discs Ubiquitination Transcription
1.
Introduction
Morphogens are secreted signaling molecules which form a concentration gradient and induce distinct cellular responses in a concentration-dependent manner. The roles of morphogen molecules in coordinating growth and patterning are reflected by the time- and tissue-specific control of the transcription of a variety of target genes. The Hh family of proteins are well-studied morphogen molecules which serve as global organizers to control tissue growth and patterning during metazoan development (Ingham and McMahon, 2001;
Ingham et al., 2011). The role of Hh as a morphogen in development is particularly well illustrated during wing disc development (Vervoort, 2000; Mullor et al., 1997; Strigini and Cohen, 1997). The larval wing imaginal disc, which finally gives rise to the adult wing blade after metamorphosis, is subdivided into distinctive anterior (A) and posterior (P) compartments. Hh expressed in the P compartment moves anteriorly to transduce its signal in a narrow stripe in the A compartment abutting the A/P boundary (Tabata and Kornberg, 1994). Hh signaling induces the localized expression of a number of target genes including decapentaplegic (dpp), patched (ptc),
* Corresponding author at: Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Tel.: +1 513 636 2144; fax: +1 513 6364317. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (X. Lin). 1 These authors contributed equally to this work. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002 0925-4773/Ó 2014 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
2
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
collier (col, also known as knot) and engrailed (en) in a concentration-dependant manner (Strigini and Cohen, 1997; Chen and Struhl, 1996; Vervoort et al., 1999; Zecca et al., 1995). Hedgehog signaling is subject to regulation at multiple levels (Di Marcotullio et al., 2007; Wang and Holmgren, 1999). These levels converge to control the stability and activity of the DNA binding protein, Ci (Smelkinson et al., 2007; Ou et al., 2002). Full-length Ci (Ci-155 or CiA) is the primary transcriptional mediator in response to Hh signaling. In the absence of Hh ligand, Ci is proteolytically processed into a shorter form (Ci-75 or CiR) that acts as a transcriptional repressor of target genes or is degraded by the proteasomes. Exposure of cells to Hh blocks the production of Ci-75 and stimulates the nuclear translocation and activation of Ci-155. Ci processing requires a complex for priming phosphorylation (Jia et al., 2002; Price and Kalderon, 2002), which is composed of the atypical kinesin protein Costal 2 (Cos2), the serine threonine kinase Fused (Fu), PKA, and the PEST domain protein Suppressor of fused (Sufu) Huangfu and Anderson, 2006. Ci phosphorylation results in the recruitment of the F-box protein Slimb/b-TRCP of the SCF ubiquitin ligase complex, which targets Ci for processing or proteasomedependent degradation (Ou et al., 2002; Smelkinson and Kalderon, 2006; Wang and Price, 2008). It is well established that Ci is the sole mediator in activating target transcription, but the detailed mechanisms underlying co-factor recruitment and differential target gene transcription remain elusive. It has been shown that the transcriptional co-activator CBP binds to Ci-155 but not Ci-75 and CBP is required for normal Hh signaling (Akimaru et al., 1997). In mammalian systems, Su(fu) can enter the nucleus accompanied by Ci to help inhibit target gene expression by recruiting SAP18, a component of the SMRT/Sin3 histone deacetylase (HDAC) co-repressor complex (Cheng and Bishop, 2002). In Drosophila, genetic impairment of hyrax (hyx) decreased the expression of the high-threshold Hh target gene col/knot, but not other targets, suggesting that differential regulation of Ci-dependent transcription is subject to more complicated and elaborate controls (Mosimann et al., 2009). The ubiquitin ligase gene hyperplastic discs (hyd, the Drosophila homolog of UBR5, CG9484) has been reported to negatively regulate Hh signaling in eye and wing development, possibly through Ci ubiquitination and degradation (Lee et al., 2002). In this study we further investigated the roles of Hyd in Hh signaling using the Drosophila wing disc as the model system. We showed that loss of hyd function results in upregulated transcription of ptc and dpp without noticeable effect on en or col transcription. We demonstrated that the ubiquitin ligase activity is strictly required for Hyd’s function. Importantly, we found that neither over-expression nor knockout of hyd alters Ci stability. We propose a model in which Hyd, through ubiquitination, participates in Ci-dependent transactivation of Hh signaling at selective promoters.
2.
Results and discussion
In a genetic screen for ubiquitin ligases involved in Hh signaling, we uncovered the role of Hyd in regulating the ranscription of a subset of Hh target genes (Fig. 1). Four Hh
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
targets have been examined, including ptc, dpp, en and col, either by anti-b-Galactosidase immunostaining for the reporters (ptc-lacZ Chen and Struhl, 1996 and dpp-lacZ (Blackman et al., 1991)) or by direct antibody staining against the gene product (En, Col and Ptc). As revealed by Hyd antibody staining, Hyd expression is not detectable in wing disc cells either homozygous for the null allele hyd15, or expressing hyd RNAi (Figs. 1A00 , B00 , C00 , 3A00 and S1B 0 . Note that flies were from the same crosses in Figs. 1D–D00 and S1B–B00 ). While loss of hyd activities strongly enhanced the transcription of ptc and dpp in a cell-autonomous manner (Figs. 1A, B and 3A), the levels of Col and En remained unchanged (Figs. 1C, D and S4B). It is worth mentioning that the upregulated dpp and ptc transcription only occurs in the anterior cells in a manner that follows the Hh gradient, indicating that Hyd loss modifies the signaling strength in Hh-responsive cells, rather than inducing ectopic Hh activation in cells normally not responding to Hh signaling. Meanwhile, over-expression of hyd has no effect on the transcription of any of the four target genes (Fig. S2). Next we tested whether Hyd is generally involved in signal transduction. As shown in Figs. S1 and S5, Dpp signaling does not respond to any manipulation of Hyd activity, indicating that Hyd is not a general transcription factor in the wing disc. To determine the possible role of Hyd in Hh ligand production and distribution, we stained Hh protein in wing discs expressing hyd RNAi in the dorsal compartment. No change was observed on protein levels or gradient formation of the Hh ligand when Hyd activity is knocked down (Fig. 1D 0 ). Taken together with the nuclear localization revealed by antibody staining (Fig. S1), these data argue that hyd is selectively involved in the regulation of specific Hh target genes by a nuclear process downstream of ligand reception. Previously, Lee et al. (2002) reported that Ci levels were upregulated in hyd mutant clones, and thus they proposed a model that hyd acts by targeting Ci for degradation. Our studies provided several lines of evidence against that Ci is the direct target of hyd. First, the alteration of Ci levels cannot explain the differential regulation of hh targets by hyd. Second, while we did observe similar changes in Ci distribution upon hyd loss in some cases, these changes only occurred in cells with disrupted morphology, and should therefore be considered as a secondary effect. In cells which are morphologically normal, as shown in Figs. 2A–A000 , B–B000 and S4A–A 0 , Ci levels are not subject to any alteration by Hyd impairment or disruption. Furthermore, our epistasis analysis showed that loss of Ci function eliminated all transcriptional output of Hh signaling even in cells with reduced Hyd activity (Fig. 2C–E000 ), suggesting that Hyd acts upstream of, or in parallel to, Ci in Hh signaling. Hyd and its homologs belong to the HECT family of E3 ubiquitin ligases. Several substrates have been identified for the HECT domain activity of Hyd’s mammalian homologs (Honda et al., 2002; Jung et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013; McDonald et al., 2014; Jiang et al., 2011; Cojocaru et al., 2011). To characterize the role of the HECT domain of Hyd in Hh signaling, we generated a HECT domain mutated form of Hyd by converting the catalytic cysteine at aa2854 to serine (HydCS) Metzger et al., 2012. When expressed in cells deficient in endogenous hyd, wild-type Hyd can completely
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
3
Fig. 1 – Hyd selectively controls the transcription of Hh target genes. All the wing discs presented in this and other figures were derived from third instar larvae with anterior oriented to the left and dorsal up. (A–A000 , C–C000 ) wing discs with clones of cells (CD8-GFP positive) over-expressing hyd RNAi under the control of actin-Gal4. (B–B000 ) a wing disc with clones of cells (CD8-GFP negative) carrying homozygous hyd15 allele. (D–D00 ) a wing disc over-expressing hyd RNAi under the control of ap-Gal4 in the dorsal compartment with the lines marking the dorsal–ventral boundary. The efficacy of RNAi-mediated knockdown in D–D00 is confirmed in Fig. S1. With lost or reduced hyd activity, expression of ptc-lacZ (ptcZ) and dpp-lacZ (dppZ) is upregulated, while no notable change is observed for the expression of Col, En and Hh. The gradient of Hh and En also remains normal upon RNAi-mediated knockdown of hyd. Scale bar, 50 lm.
rescue the upregulation of ptc transcription from lossfunction of hyd (Fig. 3B–B000 ) while C2854S mutation renders it incapable of rescuing elevated ptc levels, arguing that the E3 ligase activity of Hyd is required for its role in Hh signaling. Interestingly, over-expression of hydCS does not affect Ci accumulation or hh signaling activity as shown in Fig. S3, further arguing against that Ci is the direct target for the E3 ligase activity of Hyd. HECT domain-mediated ubiquitination of proteins has been reported to regulate numerous biological processes
through affecting the trafficking, function, and stability of respective substrates (Tanno and Komada, 2013). We further examined whether ubiquitination-mediated degradation is involved in the regulation of Hh signaling by Hyd. In this assay, cultured wing discs were treated either with DMSO control or with MG132 in DMSO, which can effectively block the proteasome-dependent degradation of ubiquitinated proteins. Indeed, treatment with MG132 resulted in dramatic accumulation of Ci uniformly in the anterior compartment (Fig. 3, compare E00 –D00 ) leading to a generally enhanced and expanded ptc
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
4
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
Fig. 2 – hyd controls Ci-dependent transcription without affecting Ci stability. (A–A000 ) In hyd15 clones (GFP negative), Ci levels remain unchanged. (B–B000 ) In V5Hyd over-expressing clones (CD8-GFP positive), Ci levels are unaltered. (C–E000 ) CD8-GFP marks cells co-expressing ci RNAi and hyd RNAi. When both Ci and Hyd are knocked down, the expression of Col, ptc-lacZ and dpp-lacZ is all eliminated. Scale bar, 50 lm.
transcription domain (Fig. 3, compare E–D). However, loss of hyd function caused a further increase in both the level and the range of ptc transcription in the already elevated background (Fig. 3E), again arguing against the previous hypothesis
that Hyd acts on Ci degradation. In addition, we failed to detect any change in Ci ubiquitination in cultured cells when Hyd or HydCS is expressed (Fig. S6), suggesting that Ci is not the direct target for the E3 ligase activity of Hyd.
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
5
Fig. 3 – hyd controls Hh signaling in an E3 activity-dependent manner. (A–C000 ) Genetic rescue experiments using MARCM system. Over-expression of V5hyd (B–B000 ) but not the E3-dead form V5hydCS (C–C000 ) can block the upregulated expression of Ptc in hyd15 clones (CD8-GFP positive). (D–E000 ) wing discs with clones of cells (CD8-GFP positive) over-expressing actin-Gal4driven hyd RNAi were dissected and cultured in M3 medium containing DMSO (D–D000 ) or MG132 (100 lM) for up to 6 h before immunostaining. MG132 treatment caused a uniform anterior accumulation of Ci (E00 ) while it does not block the upregulation of ptc-lacZ in hyd RNAi clones (CD8-GFP positive). Scale bar, 50 lm.
To further investigate how Hyd regulates the transcriptional activity of Ci, we examined the physical
interaction between these two proteins. Intriguingly, both the full-length Ci and CiM (aa 440-1160) were found to interact
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
6
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
with Flag-tagged Hyd in cultured S2 cells while CiN (aa1-450) and CiC (aa1161-1377a) both of which lack the DNA-binding zinc finger domain failed to do so (Fig. 4A and B). This result provided the molecular basis for the specific role of Hyd in restraining the signaling strength under Hh activation. Next we asked how Hyd functions in a target gene-restricted manner. One simple explanation would be that Hyd is selectively associated with different target genes. To test the hypothesis,
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
we checked whether hyd is selectively enriched for the seven target genes of Hh and Dpp signaling with ChIP coupled real time PCR, and we also incorporate the house-keeping gene, rp49 as a control. In support of the hypothesis, the ChIPPCR results with cultured cells indicated that hyd is only enriched around the transcription start site (TSS) of ptc and dpp promoters at a ratio of 0.7% and 0.5% respectively in both S2 and Clone 8 cells, while the enrichment for en and col
Fig. 4 – hyd selectively associates with promoters of hh targets. (A) Co-immunoprecipitation (IP) assays in clone 8 cells. IB: immunoblot. Hyd is found in a complex with Ci but not CiN. (B) Co-immunoprecipitation (IP) assays in clone 8 cells. IB: immunoblot. Hyd is found in a complex with CiM but not CiN and CiC. * indicated the expressed bands of Myc CiM and CiN. (C) ChIP-PCR assays in cultured cells. Hyd selectively associates with the transcription start sites (TSSs) of Hh-responsive promoters in S2 cells. (D) ChIP-PCR assays in cultured cells. Hyd does not associate with transcription start site (TSS) of dpp responsive promoters in Clone 8 cells. Error bars show the standard deviation (mean plus SD) of the ChIP PCR reactions performed in triplicate. * indicates statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) calculated by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test.
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
promoters is less than 0.2% (Fig. 4 C and D, Fig. S7). Since S2 cells do not express Ci while Clone 8 cells have endogenous Ci expression, these results indicate that Hyd acts as a preexisting factor at selective promoters whose binding is independent from the presence of Ci. Moreover, in agreement with no participation in Dpp signaling, Hyd was not enriched at any of the dpp-responsive promoters examined here (Fig. S7). Based on the above results, we made the following conclusions: first, Hyd selectively restrains the maximal transcriptional activity of Ci for specific Hh target genes including dpp and ptc; second, this regulation absolutely requires the E3 ligase activity of Hyd; third, in regulating Hh signaling, Hyd does not act on the proteasome-mediated degradation of its substrate. Our findings strongly suggest that Ci recruits and assembles differential sets of transcriptional co-factors at respective target genes. Further studies are needed to identify the substrate for Hyd and to characterize the detailed process that Hyd is involved in Hh signaling. Previously, several Ci co-factors have been reported to affect Hh signaling in a target gene-restricted manner. The mediator complex subunits Skuld (Skd) and Kohtalo (Kto) are involved in controlling the transcription of cell affinity-regulating genes, yet not ptc and dpp (Janody et al., 2003). As one of the key components of the PAF1 complex, Hyx is a positive regulator of col transcription, yet does not affect ptc, dpp or en (Mosimann et al., 2009). Different target genes have distinctive requirements for the threshold of Hh signaling, with en and col for the high threshold, ptc for the intermediate, and dpp for the lowest. The role of Hyd to specifically restrict the transcriptional outputs of intermediate- to high-threshold target genes in Hh signaling provides a good example toward the question ‘how organisms achieve functional robustness and plasticity for morphogen signaling’. On one hand, the maintenance of a maximal transcriptional potential helps organisms resist to detrimental signaling over-activation in face of genetic and environmental perturbations, such as ectopic Ci activation in this case; on the other hand, differential control of a subset of target genes fine-tunes the sensitivity of cellular responses, conferring cells the flexibility to adapt to developmental dynamics. Altogether, our studies provide more insights into the mechanisms underlying the precise regulation of morphogen signaling.
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
7
shocks were performed for 60 min at 37 °C at second instar larval stage. RNAi lines targeting hyd, P(GD14227)v44676, P(GD14227)v44675 were obtained from Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center (VDRC). The ptc-lacZ and dpp-lacZ reporters are enhancer trap lines.
3.2.
Antibody production and purification
Hyd antibodies were generated by immunizing mouse and rabbit with affinity purified GST fusion antigenic fragments (aa570-670) in the vector pGEX-4T-1 from bacterial culture. To obtain purified antibody for CHIP assay, the same antigenic fragment was also subcloned into pET28 for His-tagged protein production. The His-tagged fragment was covalently crosslinked with the AminoLinkTM Coupling Resin and Immobilization Kit (44890, Thermo scientific). The His-tagged antigencoupled resin was then used to affinity purify the rabbit antiserum against hyd to produce a highly purified polyclonal antibody. The full length cDNA of Colier was cloned into the pGEX4T-1 and the protein was affinity purified with GST fusion resin from bacterial culture. The polyclonal mouse or rabbit a-Col antibody were prepared and the antibody was purified with the antigenic fragment according to standard protocols.
3.3.
Immunostaining
3.
Methods
Discs were dissected from wandering third instar larvae and immunofluorescence staining was carried out as previously described (Han et al., 2005). Briefly, larvae are dissected in cold PBS (pH7.4) and fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS for 15 min. Samples were then permeabilized in PBS + 0.1% Triton X-100 and blocked in 5% normal horse serum. Primary antibodies in 5% normal horse serum were incubated overnight at 4 °C or 2 h at RT. Primary antibodies used for the immunostainings were mouse or rabbit a-V5 (Life Technology), rabbit anti-pMad (1:200) (Cell Signaling), rabbit a-Spalt major (1:100), antihedgehog (1:40), and chicken a-lacZ (1:100). Mouse antipatched (DSHB), mouse anti-engrailed (DSHB), rat anti-Ci 2A1 (DSHB) were obtained from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB), University of Iowa, Department of Biological Sciences. Fluorophore conjugated secondary antibodies were from Jackson Immunoresearch. Confocal images were collected as single frames on a Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscope. MG132 (100 lM; Calbiochem) in M3 medium (Sigma) was used to treat wing discs for up to 6 h before immunostaining.
3.1.
Drosophila husbandry
3.4.
All crosses were reared using standard techniques at 25 °C. Flies were raised on standard cornmeal-yeast-agar Drosophila medium at 25 °C unless otherwise indicated. The EMS allele of hyd15 was obtained from Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC) and the allele was then recombined with P{FRT(whs)}2A P{neoFRT}82B for mosaic clone analysis. Mosaic clones are produced by cross of the recombined null allele with fly stock yw, hsflp; FRT82B Ubi-GFP/TM6B. MARCM clones are produced by crossing recombined null allele with fly stock yw, hsflp, UAS-CD8GFP; TubGal4 FRT82B TubGal80/TM6B. Flipout clones are produced by crossing RNAi with fly stock yw, hsflp/+; Act> y+> Gal4-UAS-CD8GFP/CyO; MKRS/TM6B. Heat
Plasmids and transgenes
Molecular cloning was performed in accordance with standard protocol. The cDNA of hyd is assembled from various fragments by synthetic methods, and detailed cloning procedures will be available on request. The mutation of cyteine to serine at aa2854 was introduced by Quickchange protocol, then substituted with the corresponding C terminal fragment of full length hyd cDNA and sequencing is used to confirm the replacement. The molecular cloning details are available on request. Hyd cDNA (WT) and the CS mutant were then subcloned into pUAST-attB-V5 for generation of transgenic flies according to standard protocol. The transgenic flies, UAS-V5-hyd and UAS-V5-hydC2854S, are generated according
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
8
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
to site-directed integration protocol and used for rescue analysis. Ci and its mutant plasmids were described previously (Zhang et al., 2006).
4.
Author contributions
G.W., X.T. designed the study, analyzed the data and wrote the paper, G.W., X.T., Y.Ch, J.C., Q.H., X.L., W.R., S.L. and Y.W. conducted experiments. L.R. provided insightful comments. X.L. designed, managed and supervised work and analyzed experiments.
Acknowledgements We thank Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center, the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB) and the Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center (VDRC) for fly stocks and antibodies. We thank Dr. Qing Zhang for plasmids encoding Ci and its mutants. This work was supported by Grants from National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB943901, 2011 CB943902 and 2011 CB943802), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31030049), Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Grant (XDA01010101), and NIH Grants (2R01GM063891 and 1R01GM087517).
Appendix A. Supplementary material Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.mod.2014.05.002.
R E F E R E N C E S
Ingham, P.W., McMahon, A.P., 2001. Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles. Genes Dev. 15 (23), 3059–3087. Ingham, P.W., Nakano, Y., Seger, C., 2011. Mechanisms and functions of Hedgehog signalling across the metazoa. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12 (6), 393–406. Vervoort, M., 2000. Hedgehog and wing development in Drosophila: a morphogen at work? BioEssays 22 (5), 460–468. Mullor, J.L. et al, 1997. Hedgehog activity, independent of decapentaplegic, participates in wing disc patterning. Development 124 (6), 1227–1237. Strigini, M., Cohen, S.M., 1997. A Hedgehog activity gradient contributes to AP axial patterning of the Drosophila wing. Development 124 (22), 4697–4705. Tabata, T., Kornberg, T.B., 1994. Hedgehog is a signaling protein with a key role in patterning Drosophila imaginal discs. Cell 76 (1), 89–102. Chen, Y., Struhl, G., 1996. Dual roles for patched in sequestering and transducing Hedgehog. Cell 87 (3), 553–563. Vervoort, M. et al, 1999. The COE transcription factor Collier is a mediator of short-range Hedgehog-induced patterning of the Drosophila wing. Curr. Biol. 9 (12), 632–639. Zecca, M., Basler, K., Struhl, G., 1995. Sequential organizing activities of engrailed, hedgehog and decapentaplegic in the Drosophila wing. Development 121 (8), 2265–2278.
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
Di Marcotullio, L. et al, 2007. Multiple ubiquitin-dependent processing pathways regulate hedgehog/gli signaling: implications for cell development and tumorigenesis. Cell Cycle 6 (4), 390–393. Wang, Q.T., Holmgren, R.A., 1999. The subcellular localization and activity of Drosophila cubitus interruptus are regulated at multiple levels. Development 126 (22), 5097–5106. Smelkinson, M.G., Zhou, Q., Kalderon, D., 2007. Regulation of CiSCFSlimb binding, Ci proteolysis, and hedgehog pathway activity by Ci phosphorylation. Dev. Cell 13 (4), 481–495. Ou, C.Y. et al, 2002. Distinct protein degradation mechanisms mediated by Cul1 and Cul3 controlling Ci stability in Drosophila eye development. Genes Dev. 16 (18), 2403–2414. Jia, J. et al, 2002. Shaggy/GSK3 antagonizes Hedgehog signalling by regulating Cubitus interruptus. Nature 416 (6880), 548–552. Price, M.A., Kalderon, D., 2002. Proteolysis of the Hedgehog signaling effector Cubitus interruptus requires phosphorylation by Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 and Casein Kinase 1. Cell 108 (6), 823–835. Huangfu, D., Anderson, K.V., 2006. Signaling from Smo to Ci/Gli: conservation and divergence of Hedgehog pathways from Drosophila to vertebrates. Development 133 (1), 3–14. Smelkinson, M.G., Kalderon, D., 2006. Processing of the Drosophila hedgehog signaling effector Ci-155 to the repressor Ci-75 is mediated by direct binding to the SCF component Slimb. Curr. Biol. 16 (1), 110–116. Wang, Y., Price, M.A., 2008. A unique protection signal in Cubitus interruptus prevents its complete proteasomal degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28 (18), 5555–5568. Akimaru, H. et al, 1997. Drosophila CBP is a co-activator of cubitus interruptus in hedgehog signalling. Nature 386 (6626), 735–738. Cheng, S.Y., Bishop, J.M., 2002. Suppressor of Fused represses Glimediated transcription by recruiting the SAP18-mSin3 corepressor complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (8), 5442– 5447. Mosimann, C., Hausmann, G., Basler, K., 2009. The role of Parafibromin/Hyrax as a nuclear Gli/Ci-interacting protein in Hedgehog target gene control. Mech. Dev. 126 (5–6), 394–405. Lee, J.D. et al, 2002. The ubiquitin ligase Hyperplastic discs negatively regulates hedgehog and decapentaplegic expression by independent mechanisms. Development 129 (24), 5697–5706. Blackman, R.K. et al, 1991. An extensive 3 0 cis-regulatory region directs the imaginal disk expression of decapentaplegic, a member of the TGF-beta family in Drosophila. Development 111 (3), 657–666. Honda, Y. et al, 2002. Cooperation of HECT-domain ubiquitin ligase hHYD and DNA topoisomerase II-binding protein for DNA damage response. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (5), 3599–3605. Jung, H.Y. et al, 2013. Dyrk2-associated EDD-DDB1-VprBP E3 ligase inhibits telomerase by TERT degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 288 (10), 7252–7262. Wang, X. et al, 2013. HIV-1 Vpr protein inhibits telomerase activity via the EDD-DDB1-VPRBP E3 ligase complex. J. Biol. Chem. 288 (22), 15474–15480. McDonald, W.J. et al, 2014. Progestin-inducible EDD E3 ubiquitin ligase binds to alpha4 phosphoprotein to regulate ubiquitination and degradation of protein phosphatase PP2Ac. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 382 (1), 254–261. Jiang, W. et al, 2011. Acetylation regulates gluconeogenesis by promoting PEPCK1 degradation via recruiting the UBR5 ubiquitin ligase. Mol. Cell 43 (1), 33–44.
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
Cojocaru, M. et al, 2011. Transcription factor IIS cooperates with the E3 ligase UBR5 to ubiquitinate the CDK9 subunit of the positive transcription elongation factor B. J. Biol. Chem. 286 (7), 5012–5022. Metzger, M.B., Hristova, V.A., Weissman, A.M., 2012. HECT and RING finger families of E3 ubiquitin ligases at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 125 (Pt 3), 531–537. Tanno, H., Komada, M., 2013. The ubiquitin code and its decoding machinery in the endocytic pathway. J. Biochem. 153 (6), 497–504.
x x x ( 2 0 1 4 ) x x x –x x x
9
Janody, F. et al, 2003. Two subunits of the Drosophila mediator complex act together to control cell affinity. Development 130 (16), 3691–3701. Han, C. et al, 2005. Drosophila glypicans Dally and Dally-like shape the extracellular Wingless morphogen gradient in the wing disc. Development 132 (4), 667–679. Zhang, Q. et al, 2006. A hedgehog-induced BTB protein modulates hedgehog signaling by degrading Ci/Gli transcription factor. Dev. Cell 10 (6), 719–729.
Please cite this article in press as: Wang, G. et al, Hyperplastic discs differentially regulates the transcriptional outputs of hedgehog signaling, Mech. Dev. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2014.05.002
