Accepted Manuscript Title: Hybrid nanosystems based on natural polymers as protein carriers for respiratory delivery: Stability and toxicological evaluation Author: Susana Rodrigues Clara Cordeiro Bego˜na Seijo Carmen Remu˜na´ n-L´opez Ana Grenha PII: DOI: Reference:
S0144-8617(15)00079-X http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.048 CARP 9636
To appear in: Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:
18-8-2014 27-11-2014 21-1-2015
Please cite this article as: Rodrigues, S., Cordeiro, C., Seijo, B., Remu˜na´ n-L´opez, C., and Grenha, A.,Hybrid nanosystems based on natural polymers as protein carriers for respiratory delivery: Stability and toxicological evaluation, Carbohydrate Polymers (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.048 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1 2 3
Highlights: CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles exhibit a biocompatible profile in respiratory epithelial cells The nanoparticles are stable in presence of lysozyme
5
Glucose and sucrose are effective cryoprotectants of nanoparticles during freezedrying
cr
6
ip t
4
7
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
8
1 Page 1 of 53
8
Hybrid nanosystems based on natural polymers as protein carriers for respiratory
9
delivery: Stability and toxicological evaluation
ip t
Susana Rodriguesa, Clara Cordeirob,c,d, Begoña Seijoe, Carmen Remuñán-Lópeze, Ana Grenhaa*
CBME – Centre for Molecular and Structural Biomedicine / IBB – Institute for
cr
a
Biotechnology and Bioengineering, University of Algarve, Faculty of Sciences and
Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-
an
b
us
Technology, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal;
139 Faro, Portugal;
CEAUL- Center of Statistics and Applications, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon,
M
c
Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal;
NanoBioFar Group, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of
te
e
CESUAlg- Centre for research and development in Health, University of Algarve, Portugal;
d
d
Pharmacy, University of Santiago de Compostela, Campus Vida, 15782 Santiago de
Ac ce p
Compostela, Spain
Author e-mails (per order):
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected] *Corresponding author:
E-mail address:
[email protected] Postal address: Centre for Molecular and Structural Biomedicine (CBME), Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Building 8, Room 3.1, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal; Phone: +351 289800100 - Ext. 7441; Fax: +351 289 818419
2 Page 2 of 53
Abstract
11
Chitosan/carrageenan/tripolyphosphate nanoparticles were previously presented as holding
12
potential for an application in transmucosal delivery of macromolecules, with
13
tripolyphosphate demonstrating to contribute for both size reduction and stabilisation of the
14
nanoparticles. This work was aimed at evaluating the capacity of the nanoparticles as protein
15
carriers for pulmonary and nasal transmucosal delivery, further assessing their
16
biocompatibility pattern regarding that application. Nanoparticles demonstrated stability in
17
presence of lysozyme, while freeze-drying was shown to preserve their characteristics when
18
glucose or sucrose were used as cryoprotectants. Bovine serum albumin was associated to the
19
nanoparticles, which were successfully microencapsulated by spray-drying to meet the
20
aerodynamic requirements inherent to pulmonary delivery. Finally, a satisfactory
21
biocompatibility profile was demonstrated upon exposure of two respiratory cell lines (Calu-
22
3 and A549 cells) to the carriers. A negligible effect on cell viability along with no alterations
23
on transepithelial electrical resistance and no induction of inflammatory response were
24
observed.
26
cr
us
an
M
d
te
Ac ce p
25
ip t
10
27
Keywords: biocompatibility; microencapsulation; nanoparticles; nasal delivery; protein
28
delivery; pulmonary delivery
29
3 Page 3 of 53
29
1. Introduction
31
Several physicochemical and biopharmaceutical issues make systemic administration of
32
biomolecules a challenging task (Gupta & Sharma, 2009), compelling the need to develop
33
adequate drug delivery systems that overcome inherent limitations. These carriers are mainly
34
developed to avoid the need of parenteral administration, instead permitting effective
35
transmucosal delivery. The pulmonary and nasal routes are increasingly addressed in this
36
context, because of the large absorptive surface and the easy access, respectively, among
37
other characteristics. Carriers are thus designed to exhibit characteristics that improve the
38
epithelial contact, while protecting sensitive bioactive materials from in vivo degradation.
39
Nanoparticles are first-line candidates for this end, successfully associating therapeutic
40
macromolecules (Pinto Reis, Neufeld, Ribeiro & Veiga, 2006). A previous study
41
demonstrated the ability of two natural polymers, chitosan (CS) and κ-carrageenan (CRG), to
42
assemble into nanoparticles of 400-600 nm by simple polyelectrolyte complexation (Grenha
43
et al., 2010). While CS is a very well-known material, the abilities of CRG are not
44
sufficiently explored. Apart from the advantage of using natural materials, which facilitates
45
biocompatibility (Malafaya, Silva & Reis, 2007), the polyelectrolyte complexation between
46
CS and CRG uses very mild conditions, occurring in hydrophilic medium (Grenha, 2012).
47
Nevertheless, the intimate contact between the carrier and the epithelial surface that highly
48
favours mucosal delivery of drugs is reported to be maximal for particles of 50-500 nm
49
(Desai, Labhasetwar, Amidon & Levy, 1996; Jani, Halbert, Langridge & Florence, 1990) and
50
strong positive surface charge (Bogataj et al., 2003; Carvalho, Bruschi, Evangelista &
51
Gremião, 2010). Therefore, more recently we associated tripolyphosphate (TPP) to the
52
CS/CRG nanoparticle formulation as a cross-linking agent, providing a size decrease and
53
obtaining more stable nanoparticles (Rodrigues, Rosa da Costa & Grenha, 2012).
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
30
4 Page 4 of 53
Notwithstanding the relevance that nanoparticles have gained in the last decade, the fact is
55
that several limitations are still to overcome regarding their application. The inherent
56
tendency for particle aggregation, chemical instability of polymers and early release of active
57
substances are major problems to be addressed. In addition, as nanoparticles are usually
58
formulated as suspensions, they are prone to microbial growth (Wu, Zhang & Watanabe,
59
2011). Therefore, under all aspects, the physical and chemical stability of the systems is
60
expected to be improved if water is removed (Abdelwahed, Degobert, Stainmesse & Fessi,
61
2006). The shelf-life of nanoparticles is a relevant aspect of their potential application as drug
62
delivery carriers, especially concerning the need to maintain unaltered physicochemical
63
characteristics along time. Freeze-drying appears in this context as a very adequate choice,
64
ensuring a soft drying procedure. The more aggressive conditions associated to freeze-drying
65
can be softened by the use of specific protectants. These will provide the formation of a solid
66
amorphous glass film around the nanoparticles and the immobilisation of the carriers,
67
preventing aggregation and promoting stabilisation(Beirowski, Inghelbrecht, Arien &
68
Gieseler, 2011, 2012).
69
Safety issues are another permanent subject adjacent to nanoparticle applications. In fact,
70
regarding the inhalation of nanoparticles, their fate after administration remains uncertain and
71
there is the possibility of accumulation in the lung tissue upon repeated administrations
72
(Rogueda & Traini, 2007). With regard to the evaluation of materials safety, there is a general
73
recommendation considering that an initial in vitro evaluation should comprise different cell
74
lines and times of exposure, while not only cell viability but also the inflammatory response
75
should be determined (ISO, 2009; Rodrigues, Dionísio, Remuñán-López & Grenha, 2012).
76
The Calu-3 and A549 respiratory epithelial cell lines have been frequently used in this
77
context to evaluate the behaviour of systems aimed at respiratory drug delivery, either nasal
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
54
5 Page 5 of 53
or pulmonary (Foster, Avery, Yazdanian & Audus, 2000; Grenha et al., 2007; Nahar et al.,
79
2013).
80
In this work, we aimed at exploring the potential of CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles for an
81
application in nasal and pulmonary transmucosal delivery of proteins, placing a particular
82
emphasis on their biocompatibility behaviour. Additionally, the stability of nanoparticles in
83
presence of lysozyme (an enzyme present in the nasal and lung mucosa), as well as the ability
84
of freeze-drying to provide a dry form of nanoparticle suspensions, were also assessed.
85
Regarding pulmonary administration, as nanoparticles are known to lack the adequate
86
aerodynamic diameter to permit deep lung delivery with success, which should vary between
87
1 and 5 µm, the strategy of microencapsulating the nanocarriers was applied, following a
88
previously described approach (Grenha, Seijo & Remuñán-López, 2005).
M
an
us
cr
ip t
78
89
2. Materials and Methods
91
2.1. Materials
92
Chitosan (low molecular weight, deacetylation degree = 75-85%), pentasodium
93
tripolyphosphate, bovine serum albumin (BSA), phosphate buffer saline (PBS) tablets pH
94
7.4, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), penicillin/streptomycin (10000
95
units/mL, 10000 µg/mL), non-essential amino acids, L-glutamine 200 mM, trypsin–EDTA
96
solution (2.5 g/L trypsin, 0.5 g/L EDTA), trypan blue solution (0.4%), thiazolyl blue
97
tetrazolium bromide (MTT), sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), N,N-dimethylformamyde
98
(DMF), glycerol, lipopolysacharide (LPS), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), lysozyme and
99
glacial acetic acid were supplied by Sigma Chemicals (Germany). k-carrageenan was
Ac ce p
te
d
90
100
obtained from FMC Biopolymer (Norway) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) was from Gibco
101
(USA). Ultrapure water (Milli-Q Plus, Millipore Iberica, Spain) was used throughout.
102
6 Page 6 of 53
2.2 Cell lines
104
The Calu-3 and A549 cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection
105
(Rockville, USA) and used between passages 35–45 and 20-30, respectively. Cell cultures
106
were grown in 75 cm2 flasks in a humidified 5% CO2/95% atmospheric air incubator at 37 ºC.
107
For both cell lines, cell culture medium (CCM) was DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v)
108
FBS, 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids solution, 1% (v/v) L-glutamine solution (200 mM)
109
and 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin. Medium was exchanged every 2–3 days and cells were
110
subcultured weekly in the case of A549 cells and every 10 to 15 days for Calu-3 cell line.
us
cr
ip t
103
an
111
2.3. Preparation of CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles
113
CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles were prepared as described previously (Rodrigues, Rosa da
114
Costa & Grenha, 2012) based on the polyelectrolyte complexation of CS with CRG and
115
additional ionic gelation of chitosan with TPP anions. After an initial optimisation, a final
116
theoretical CS/CRG/TPP ratio of 4/1/1 (w/w) was selected to perform the studies (4/1/0 for
117
control nanoparticles). Briefly, CS was dissolved in 1% (w/w) acetic acid to obtain a solution
118
of 1 mg/mL. CRG and TPP were dissolved in purified water and mixed to obtain a solution
119
where the concentration of each polymer is 0.63 mg/mL. The spontaneous formation of
120
nanoparticles occurs upon incorporation of 0.8 mL of a solution of CRG/TPP or CRG into 2
121
mL of the CS solution, under gentle magnetic stirring at room temperature.
122
The association of BSA to the nanoparticles was performed by dissolving the protein in water
123
and mixing with a previously prepared mixture of CRG/TPP solution, prior to the addition to
124
CS solution, as described above. The amount of BSA associated to each batch was calculated
125
to represent a theoretical content of 30% (w/w) of the amount of CS.
Ac ce p
te
d
M
112
7 Page 7 of 53
Nanoparticles were concentrated by centrifugation at 16,000 x g on a 10 µL glycerol layer for
127
30 min at 15 °C (Heraeus Fresco 17 centrifuge, Thermo scientific, USA). After discarding the
128
supernatants, the nanoparticles were resuspended in 200 µl of purified water.
129
When no further indication is provided, ‘CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles’ refer to mass ratios
130
4/1/1.
ip t
126
cr
131
2.4. Characterisation of nanoparticles
133
2.4.1. Determination of production yield
134
The nanoparticle production yield was calculated by gravimetry. Fixed volumes of
135
nanoparticle suspensions were centrifuged (16,000 x g, 30 min, 15 °C), and sediments were
136
freeze-dried over 24 h at -34 °C, followed by a gradual increase in temperature until 20 °C,
137
using a Labconco freeze dryer (Labconco, USA) (n = 3). The yield of nanoparticle production
138
(PY) was calculated as follows:
139
PY = (Nanoparticle sediment weight/Total solids weight) x 100
140
where nanoparticle sediment weight is the weight after freeze-drying and total solids weight
141
is the total amount of solids added for nanoparticle formation.
an
M
d
te
(1)
Ac ce p
142
us
132
143
2.4.2. Morphological observation
144
The morphological examination of CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles was conducted by
145
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEM-1011, JEOL, Japan). The samples were
146
stained with 2% (w/v) phosphotungstic acid (Carvalho, Grenha, Remunan-Lopez, Alonso &
147
Seijo, 2009) and placed on copper grids with carbon films (Ted Pella, USA) for TEM
148
observation.
149 150
2.4.3. Physicochemical properties
8 Page 8 of 53
Measurements of nanoparticle size and zeta potential were performed on freshly prepared
152
samples by photon correlation spectroscopy and laser Doppler anemometry, respectively,
153
using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). For the analysis of particle
154
size and determination of the electrophoretic mobility, each sample was diluted to the
155
appropriate concentration with ultrapure water and placed in the electrophoretic cell. Each
156
analysis was performed at 25 °C. Three batches of each formulation were analysed (n = 3).
cr
ip t
151
157
2.4.4. Determination of BSA association capacity
159
The amount of non-encapsulated BSA was determined in the supernatant by reverse phase -
160
high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC; Agilent 1100 series, Germany). The
161
chromatographic conditions were adapted from Umrethia et al. (Umrethia, Kett, Andrews,
162
Malcolm & Woolfson, 2010) as follows: Aeris widepore 3.6u XB-C18 300A column 4.6 mm
163
i.d.×250 mm length with security guard cartridge (Phenomenex, UK); run temperature 25 ºC;
164
gradient flow (0.1% TFA in water (A), 0.1% TFA in acetonitrile (B); A/B from 95:5 to 35:65
165
in 10 min) mobile phase, total run time 15 min, UV detection at 280 nm; flow rate 1.0
166
mL/min; injection volume 20 µL; BSA retention time 8.8 min. A linear calibration plot for
167
BSA in the different solvents (acetic acid solution, PBS pH 7.4 and buffer pH 6.8) was
168
obtained over the range 10-120 µg/mL (n = 3). BSA association efficiency (AE) and
169
nanoparticle loading capacity (LC) were calculated as follows:
170
AE = (Total amount of BSA – Free amount of BSA)/Total amount of BSA × 100
(2)
171
LC = (Total amount of BSA – Free amount of BSA)/Nanoparticle weight × 100
(3)
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
158
172 173
2.5. Evaluation of nanoparticle stability in the presence of lysozyme
174
The stability of CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles (4/1/0 and 4/1/1) was analysed in presence of
175
lysozyme. To do so, nanoparticle suspensions at a concentration of 1 mg/mL were incubated
9 Page 9 of 53
176
with lysozyme (0.2 and 0.8 mg/mL) (Grenha, Seijo & Remuñán-López, 2005) at 37 ºC under
177
mild horizontal shaking, for 120 min. At appropriate time intervals (30, 60, 90 and 120 min),
178
the size and zeta potential of nanoparticles were measured, as described above (n = 3).
ip t
179
2.6. Nanoparticle stability upon freeze-drying
181
With the aim of developing a pharmaceutically-acceptable dry form of the nanoparticle
182
suspensions, CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles were submitted to a freeze-drying study. Different
183
concentrations of nanoparticles (1, 2 and 4 mg/mL) and different cryoprotectants (trehalose,
184
lactose, sucrose and glucose) at varied concentrations were tested as variables in the
185
optimisation of nanoparticle stabilisation by freeze-drying. To perform the study, 1 mL of
186
unloaded nanoparticles was freeze-dried in the presence of 5 or 10% (w/v) of cryoprotectant.
187
The freeze-drying process occurred at a pressure of 50–100 Torr and consisted of 24 h of
188
primary drying, starting at -35 ºC and gradually increasing to -10 ºC, 24 h at 0 ºC and a final
189
step of secondary drying (12–24 h) at 15 ºC (Labconco Corp., USA). After freeze-drying,
190
nanoparticle suspensions were reconstituted by adding the volume of water corresponding to
191
the initial volume (1 mL), and their size and zeta potential were determined as indicated
192
above (n = 3).
193
The conditions found to better maintain the original properties of unloaded nanoparticles
194
were applied on BSA-loaded nanoparticles. In this case, nanoparticle concentrations of 1 and
195
2 mg/mL were freeze-dried with both glucose and sucrose at a concentration of 10% (w/w).
us
an
M
d
te
Ac ce p
196
cr
180
197
2.7. Preparation of microencapsulated nanoparticles
198
Mannitol was selected as matrix material for the production of microparticles, as was
199
previously described (Grenha, Seijo & Remuñán-López, 2005). An aqueous solution of the
200
excipient was prepared at a concentration of 1.6% (w/v). Upon centrifugation, CS/CRG/TPP
10 Page 10 of 53
nanoparticles were resuspended with the mannitol solution instead of water, in order to obtain
202
a mannitol/nanoparticle ratio of 80/20 (w/w). The final solid concentration of the suspensions
203
was 2% (w/v).
204
Dry powders were obtained by spray-drying the previously prepared suspension using a
205
laboratory-scale spray-dryer (Buchi® Mini Spray Dryer, B-290, Buchi, Switzerland).
206
The spray-drying conditions were: feed rate of 2.5 mL/min, two fluids external nozzle 0.7
207
mm, inlet temperature of 160 ± 2 ºC, outlet temperature of 95 ± 3 ºC. The airflow rate and the
208
aspirator were kept constant at 400 Nl/h and 80%, respectively. The spray-dried powders
209
were collected and stored in a desiccator at room temperature until use.
an
us
cr
ip t
201
210
2.8. Characterisation of microencapsulated nanoparticles
212
2.8.1. Determination of spray-drying yield
213
The spray-drying yield was calculated by gravimetry, comparing the total amount of solids
214
initially added for the preparation of microencapsulated nanoparticles (CS + CRG + TPP +
215
BSA + mannitol) with the amount of resulting microspheres (n = 3). The following equation
216
was used for the calculation:
217
Yield (%) = Microspheres weight/Total solids weight × 100
d
te
Ac ce p
218
M
211
(4)
219
2.8.2. Morphological and aerodynamic characterisation
220
The morphological characterisation of microspheres was performed using a field emission
221
scanning electron microscope (FESEM; FESEM Ultra Plus, Zeiss, Germany) at 3 kV of
222
voltage, which is equipped with a secondary electron (SE) detector. The dry powders were
223
placed onto metal plates and a 5 nm thick gold palladium film was sputter-coated on the
224
samples (Q150T S/E/ES Sputter Coater, Quorum Technologies, UK) before viewing.
11 Page 11 of 53
The particle size was estimated as the Feret’s diameter (distance between two tangents on
226
opposite sides of the particles) and was directly determined with an optical microscope
227
(Olympus IX51, Japan). The estimation was based on the mean diameter resulting from the
228
evaluation of 300 particles (n = 300).
229
Real density was determined using a Helium Pycnometer (Micropycnometer, Quanta
230
Chrome, model MPY-2, USA) (n = 3). Apparent tap density was obtained by measuring the
231
volume of a known weight of powder in a 10 mL test-tube after mechanical tapping (30
232
tap/min, Tecnociencia, Spain). After registration of the initial volume, the test-tube was
233
submitted to tapping until constant volume was achieved, according to a previously described
234
method (El-Gibaly, 2002) (n = 3).
235
The aerodynamic diameter was obtained using a TSI Aerosizer® LD equipped with an
236
Aerodisperser® (Amherst Process Instrument Inc.; Amherst, MA, USA) and assuming real
237
density as the density parameter for the determination of the aerodynamic diameter.
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
225
te
238
2.9. In vitro biocompatibility study
240
2.9.1. Evaluation of metabolic activity
241
The in vitro cytotoxicity of CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles, microencapsulated nanoparticles
242
(mannitol/nanoparticles = 80/20, w/w), as well as that of the raw materials involved in
243
nanoparticle production, was assessed by the metabolic assay thiazolyl blue tetrazolium
244
bromide (MTT) test. Two cell lines representative of pulmonary and nasal epithelia (Calu-3
245
and A549 cells) were used. A549 cells were seeded at a density of 1×104 cells/well and Calu-
246
3 cells at 2×104 cells/well in 96-well plates, in 100 µl of the same medium used for culture in
247
cell culture flasks. The cells were grown at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 24 h before
248
use (Grenha et al., 2007).
Ac ce p
239
12 Page 12 of 53
Three different concentrations (0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/mL) of nanoparticles were evaluated for
250
cytotoxicity over 3 and 24 h. Suspensions of unloaded nanoparticles and microencapsulated
251
nanoparticles, BSA loaded nanoparticles and solutions of the individual raw materials (CS,
252
CRG and TPP) were evaluated separately for cytotoxicity. Sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS,
253
2%, w/v) was used as a positive control of cell death. Optimal cell seeding density and the
254
absence of MTT conversion in the assay medium were confirmed in preliminary experiments.
255
All formulations and controls were prepared as solution/suspensions in pre-warmed CCM
256
without FBS immediately before application to the cells.
257
To initiate the assay, culture medium of cells at 24 h in culture was replaced by 100 µL of
258
fresh medium without FBS containing the test samples or controls. After 3 or 24 h of cell
259
incubation, samples/controls were removed and 30 µL of the MTT solution (0.5 mg/mL in
260
PBS, pH 7.4) were added to each well. After 2 h, any generated formazan crystals were
261
solubilised with 50 µL of DMSO. Upon complete solubilisation of the crystals, the
262
absorbance of each well was measured by spectrophotometry (Infinite M200, Tecan, Austria)
263
at 540 nm and corrected for background absorbance using a wavelength of 650
264
nm(Carmichael, DeGraff, Gazdar, MInna & Mitchell, 1987).
265
The relative cell viability (%) was calculated as follows:
266
Viability (%) = (A – S)/(CM – S)× 100
267
where A is the absorbance obtained for each of the concentrations of the test substance, S is
268
the absorbance obtained for the 2% SDS and CM is the absorbance obtained for untreated
269
cells (incubated with CCM). The latter reading was assumed to correspond to 100% cell
270
viability. The assay was performed on three occasions with six replicates at each
271
concentration of test substance in each instance.
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
249
(6)
272 273
2.9.2. Determination of inflammatory response
13 Page 13 of 53
The inflammatory response generated by the exposure to nanoparticles and
275
microencapsulated nanoparticles was evaluated on Calu-3 cells. To perform the assay, the
276
cells were seeded on 96-well plates (2×104 cells/well) and, after 24 h incubation at 37 °C in
277
5% CO2 atmosphere, exposed to nanoparticles and microencapsulated nanoparticles at a
278
concentration of 1 mg/mL. The exposure to lypopolysacharide (LPS; 10 μg/mL) was used as
279
positive control (Alfaro-Moreno et al., 2009; Mura et al., 2011), while cells incubated with
280
CCM were used as negative control. All formulations and controls were prepared as
281
solutions/suspensions in pre-warmed CCM without FBS immediately before application to
282
the cells. After 24 h of exposure, the cell supernatants were collected and centrifuged (10
283
min, 16,000 x g, 15 ºC, centrifuge 5804R, Eppendorf, Germany). The levels of IL-6 and IL-8
284
existing in Calu-3 cell supernatants were determined by quantitative ELISA using human IL-
285
6 and IL-8 Quantikine ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), according to the
286
manufacturer’s instructions. The supernatants were appropriately diluted (approximately 10
287
times for IL-6 and 50 times for IL-8). The assay was performed on three occasions with two
288
replicates of test substance in each instance. The concentration of individual cytokines for
289
each sample is expressed as percentage of the control (incubation with CCM) from triplicate
290
assays.
cr
us
an
M
d
te
Ac ce p
291
ip t
274
292
2.9.3. Evaluation of epithelial integrity
293
For the studies of epithelial integrity, Calu-3 cells were cultured at an air interface according
294
to a previously described methodology (Grainger, Greenwell, Lockley, Martin & Forbes,
295
2006). Briefly, 100 µL of Calu-3 cell suspension was seeded at a density of 5×105 cells/cm2
296
in Transwell inserts (0.33cm2), with 0.5 mL medium in the basolateral chamber. The cells
297
were incubated at 37 ºC, 5% CO2 for 2 days. After this time, the medium was aspirated from
298
the apical and basolateral chambers and replaced only in the basolateral chamber, the apical 14 Page 14 of 53
chamber being exposed to the incubator atmosphere. Medium was replaced every 2 days
300
thereafter.
301
In order to verify the effect of nanoparticles on Calu-3 cell layer integrity, the formulations
302
were dispersed in 100 µL FBS-free CCM at a concentration of 1 mg/mL and incubated with
303
the cell layers. Transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) was measured using chopstick
304
electrodes and an EVOM® volt meter (STX-2 and Evom G, World Precision Instruments,
305
UK). TER measurements were taken 30 min before the experiment and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24
306
and 48 h after administration. TER values were calculated by subtracting the resistance of
307
cell-free culture inserts and correcting for the surface area of the Transwell insert. Cell layers
308
incubated with CCM were used as the reference (control), from which TER changes during
309
exposure to the samples were calculated. All experiments were performed in triplicate on
310
three occasions.
M
an
us
cr
ip t
299
d
311
2.10. Statistical analysis
313
For the generality of results, the t-test and the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with
314
the pairwise multiple comparison procedures (Dunn’s Method) were performed to compare
315
two or multiple groups, respectively.
316
The freeze-drying case study determines the effect of different cryoprotectants and
317
nanoparticle concentration on nanoparticle stability. Due to the number of observations
318
involved (three to four) in each cell/treatment and to the existence of empty cells, a more
319
complex statistical methodology was not applied, because it would compromise the model
320
assumptions and result in misleading inferences. Therefore, the statistical approach used for
321
this analysis was the one-way ANOVA with Gowes-Howell post-hoc tests, based on sample
322
sizes and variance homogeneity between groups.
Ac ce p
te
312
15 Page 15 of 53
The factorial design (FD) is often used for manipulative experiments, such as that of the
324
metabolic activity (MTT test). In that case, for both cell lines tested (Calu-3 and A549) the
325
effect of sample type (X1) and concentration (X2) on cell viability (Y). Each of the factors (X1
326
and X2) has three levels. In the case of X2 the levels are 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/mL. For X1 there
327
is a split in two groups: 1) when raw materials are considered the levels of X1 are CS, CRG
328
and TPP; 2) when carrier formulations are studied, the levels are unloaded nanoparticles,
329
BSA-loaded nanoparticles, microencapsulated nanoparticles. For either raw materials or
330
carrier formulations, the objective is to investigate the influence of factors X1 and X2 on the
331
response variable (Y). FD was originally planned with equal number of observations per
332
treatment, but some occurrences related to random loss of observations or to practical
333
constraints, cause inequality of sample sizes. Therefore, for the four multifactor designs
334
present in this study, three were unbalanced with observations in every cell/treatment. For
335
this complex FD, the type III sum of squares (SS) was used, because it is not influenced by
336
the sample size in each treatment. The basic multivariate assumptions to be checked are that
337
the errors are independent, normally distributed and have constant variance. Further analyses
338
with Post hoc tests Hochberg´s GT2 (unbalanced FD) and Tukey, were used to determine
339
which groups differ.
340
The statistical analyses were performed with the software SPSS (version 22.0 for windows)
341
considering a significance level of α = 0.05.
cr
us
an
M
d
te
Ac ce p
342
ip t
323
343
3. Results and discussion
344
CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles were previously reported by our group in a work that evidenced
345
the ability of TPP to decrease nanoparticle size and improve stability (Rodrigues, Rosa da
346
Costa & Grenha, 2012). In that work, the potential of the carriers for transmucosal drug
347
delivery was suggested. More recently we have observed the ability of these nanocarriers to
16 Page 16 of 53
associate different proteins, demonstrating that the pH of the nanoparticle assembly medium
349
has a strong effect on protein association and the pH of the release medium affects the release
350
profile (unpublished results). The present work is dedicated to the study of these
351
nanoparticles regarding an application in nasal and pulmonary delivery.
ip t
348
352
3.1. Characterisation of CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles
354
After an initial screening of varied CS/CRG/TPP mass ratios, seeking for the formulation that
355
produces nanoparticles with the most suitable characteristics for the objective of
356
transmucosal delivery (Rodrigues, Rosa da Costa & Grenha, 2012), the formulation
357
CS/CRG/TPP = 4/1/1 (w/w) was selected for subsequent studies. The corresponding
358
formulation without TPP (CS/CRG/TPP = 4/1/0, w/w) was used as control in some of the
359
performed studies to show the effect of the inclusion of TPP.
360
Figure 1A depicts the result of the morphological evaluation of BSA-loaded nanoparticles,
361
which evidence a spherical structure similar to both unloaded nanoparticles (Rodrigues, Rosa
362
da Costa & Grenha, 2012) and to polysaccharide-based nanoparticles in general (Goycoolea,
363
Lollo, Remunan-Lopez, Quaglia & Alonso, 2009; Oyarzun-Ampuero, Brea, Loza, Torres &
364
Alonso, 2009; Zorzi, Párraga, Seijo & Sánchez, 2011).
365
As shown in Table 1, the developed BSA-loaded nanoparticles evidence adequate
366
physicochemical properties for the objective of transmucosal delivery, with a size around 300
367
nm and a positive zeta potential (+40 mV). In fact, the size is small enough to permit an
368
intimate contact with epithelial surfaces, which is maximal at 50 – 500 nm (Desai,
369
Labhasetwar, Amidon & Levy, 1996; Jani, Halbert, Langridge & Florence, 1990). In turn, the
370
high positive zeta potential further potentiates the interaction with epithelia, as this is
371
negatively charged and, thus, an electrostatic interaction is enabled. In summary, these
372
characteristics are expected to provide a prolonged retention of nanoparticles close to
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
353
17 Page 17 of 53
epithelial surfaces, potentiating protein release. Notwithstanding the importance of these
374
physicochemical features, the presence of mucus and the mechanism of mucociliary
375
clearance also need to be considered regarding the success of nasal and pulmonary
376
transmucosal delivery (Dombu & Betbeder, 2013; Marttin, Schipper, Verhoef & Merkus,
377
1998). Nanoparticles described in this work are expected to exhibit bioadhesive properties to
378
some extent, due to the chitosan content. Besides the proper chitosan ability to adhere to
379
biological substrates (Du, Cai & Zhai, 2014; Lehr, Bouwstra, Schacht & Junginger, 1992),
380
chitosan-based nanoparticles have also demonstrated the same capacity in several occasions
381
(Bernkop-Schnürch, Weithaler, Albrecht & Greimel, 2006; Sandri, Bonferoni, Rossi, Ferrari,
382
Boselli & Caramella, 2010). This will possibly improve the carrier residence time close to the
383
epithelia, potentiating drug absorption (Dombu & Betbeder, 2013; Marttin, Schipper, Verhoef
384
& Merkus, 1998). Additionally, nanoparticles have been reported to avoid or delay
385
mucociliary clearance, although this ability is highly dependent on their size and is more
386
relevant for particles below 100 nm (Oberdörster, Oberdörster & Oberdörster, 2005; Sung,
387
Pulliam & Edwards, 2007).
388
It is also observed in the table that the inclusion of TPP in the formulation increases the
389
nanoparticle production yield, while maintaining the encapsulation efficiency, which is
390
around 50%. A great difference is observed in loading capacity, which is of 70% for
391
CS/CRG/TPP = 4/1/0 and approximately 30% for 4/1/1. This difference is explained by the
392
fact that, while both formulations encapsulate a similar amount of protein, the nanoparticles
393
containing TPP display a considerably higher production yield. Therefore, as viewed in Eq. 3,
394
there is the same amount of protein distributed by a higher amount of total solids, thereby
395
resulting in a lower value of loading capacity. Unloaded nanoparticles display somewhat
396
different physicochemical characteristics, 4/1/0 nanoparticles having 491 nm and +78 mV
397
and 4/1/1 nanoparticles displaying a size of 208 nm and +47 mV (data not shown).
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
373
18 Page 18 of 53
3.2. Evaluation of nanoparticle stability in presence of lysozyme
399
Lysozyme is an enzyme that is present in mucosal surfaces, including the nasal and
400
pulmonary (Konstan, Chen, Sherman, Thomassen, Woodm & Boat, 1981; Muzzarelli, 1997),
401
which exhibits the ability to cleave β-(1-4) glycosidic bonds of chitosan (Muzzarelli, 1997).
402
Therefore, taking into account the high content of chitosan present in the proposed
403
nanoparticles, evaluating their behaviour in presence of this enzyme is important regarding a
404
future interpretation of results, such as those obtained in vivo. To perform the evaluation,
405
nanoparticles were incubated with lysozyme (0.2 and 0.8 mg/mL) at 37 ºC and their size and
406
zeta potential were monitored along time. The enzyme concentration of 0.2 mg/mL was used
407
taking into account indications found in the literature regarding physiological concentrations
408
of the enzyme (Konstan, Chen, Sherman, Thomassen, Woodm & Boat, 1981). Furthermore, a
409
concentration of 0.8 mg/mL was chosen to investigate the nanoparticle behaviour in extreme
410
conditions, as previously reported (Grenha, Seijo & Remuñán-López, 2005).
411
As observed in Figure 2, the formulation of nanoparticles without TPP (CS/CRG) showed a
412
tendency for size decrease along time. When lysozyme was present at a concentration of 0.2
413
mg/mL, the decrease was not significant, as high standard deviations are obtained. However,
414
at 0.8 mg/mL a strong and significant size decrease (p < 0.05) occurs up to 60 min of
415
incubation, although after that a sudden increase in size is observed, inverting the trend. This
416
is probably due to aggregation, as a concomitant increase in the standard deviation of the
417
mean size is observed, indicating a great dispersion of sizes. Zeta potential, in turn, remained
418
stable during the assay (data not shown). Interestingly, the formulation containing TPP was
419
not affected by the presence of the enzyme, no significant size reduction being observed
420
independently of the concentration of lysozyme. This behaviour reveals a somewhat
421
protecting effect attributed by TPP.
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
398
19 Page 19 of 53
An absence of effect of the enzyme on chitosan-based nanoparticles (also containing TPP)
423
incubated in similar conditions was previously reported in another study (Vila, Sánchez,
424
Tobı́o, Calvo & Alonso, 2002). It is possible that the inclusion of TPP, which acts as cross-
425
linker, prevents or at least modifies chitosan exposure, thus not enabling an easy and rapid
426
enzymatic degradation as is seen for nanoparticles devoid of TPP.
ip t
422
cr
427
3.3. Evaluation of nanoparticle stability upon freeze-drying
429
When nanocarriers are formulated as aqueous suspensions, both physical
430
(aggregation/particle fusion) and chemical (hydrolysis of polymer and chemical reactivity)
431
instability phenomena are known to appear at some point (Abdelwahed, Degobert,
432
Stainmesse & Fessi, 2006; Chacón, Molpeceres, Berges, Guzmán & Aberturas, 1999; Kumar,
433
Shafiq & Malhotra, 2012), limiting nanoparticle applications (Sameti et al., 2003; Wu, Zhang
434
& Watanabe, 2011). Aqueous suspensions of CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles were reported in a
435
previous work to remain stable for up to 9 months, the presence of TPP in the formulation
436
demonstrating to have a significant role in this effect (Rodrigues, Rosa da Costa & Grenha,
437
2012). However, the preference in storing and transporting products in dry state, has led to
438
the decision of developing a lyophilised formulation. Regarding the present work, it is
439
important to recall that a nasal formulation of nanoparticles will involve a suspension, while
440
microencapsulated nanoparticles (dry powders) are proposed for lung delivery. Still, in the
441
latter case there might be a time period between nanoparticle production and
442
microencapsulation where a lyophilized form of nanoparticles will be beneficial for storage.
443
Freeze-drying has been considered an adequate technique to improve the long-term stability
444
of colloidal nanoparticles. Nevertheless, it is a complex process that requires a major
445
optimisation of the inherent conditions. Many parameters of the formulation/process may
446
decide the success of freeze-drying (Abdelwahed, Degobert, Stainmesse & Fessi, 2006). In
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
428
20 Page 20 of 53
this study, nanoparticles were freeze-dried using different sugars as cryoprotectants, at varied
448
concentrations. The concentration of nanoparticle suspensions was also tested as variable.
449
The direct freeze-drying of nanoparticles (without cryoprotectants) did not permit the
450
preservation of their properties (data not shown), leading to strong aggregation. This effect
451
might be explained by both the high concentration of particles undergoing the freezing step
452
and the mechanical stress induced by ice crystallization (Abdelwahed, Degobert, Stainmesse
453
& Fessi, 2006; Vauthier & Bouchemal, 2009). This observation was reported in a previous
454
work of our group for nanoparticles composed of other polysaccharides (Dionísio, Cordeiro,
455
Remuñán-López, Seijo, Rosa da Costa & Grenha, 2013), as well as in other works available
456
on the literature (Abdelwahed, Degobert, Stainmesse & Fessi, 2006; de la Fuente, Seijo &
457
Alonso, 2008).
458
The purpose of this study was thus examining the effects of type of cryoprotectant (sucrose,
459
trehalose, lactose and glucose), cryoprotectant concentration (5% and 10%, w/w) and
460
nanoparticle concentration (1, 2 and 4 mg/mL) on the nanoparticle characteristics upon
461
reconstitution with water from the corresponding lyophilized powder.
462
Figure 3 displays the variation of nanoparticle size when comparing the obtained value after
463
reconstitution of freeze-dried material (Df) with that initially determined (Di) before the
464
freeze-drying process. As a first approach, unloaded nanoparticles were used. The ANOVA
465
experiment revealed that the concentration of nanoparticle suspensions to be freeze-dried is
466
the sole parameter evidencing a relevant and statistically significant effect on the stability
467
conferred by the cryoprotectants. In this regard, the post-hoc test (Gowes-Howell) shows that
468
using nanoparticle concentrations of 2 mg/mL or 4 mg/mL leads to a higher increase of
469
nanoparticle size (p < 0.05) as compared with 1 mg/mL, which is the concentration
470
permitting the desired maintenance of size after freeze-drying.
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
447
21 Page 21 of 53
Zeta potential values did not evidence alterations after freeze-drying in any of the tested
472
conditions (data not shown). Other works studying the freeze-drying of comparable
473
concentrations of polysaccharide-based nanoparticles have reported good stabilization
474
provided by the same or similar cryoprotectants (de la Fuente, Seijo & Alonso, 2008;
475
Dionísio, Cordeiro, Remuñán-López, Seijo, Rosa da Costa & Grenha, 2013; Hirsjärvi,
476
Peltonen & Hirvonen, 2009).
477
Although not to a statistically significant manner, other interpretations might be suggested by
478
Figure 3. Regarding the performance of the distinct cryoprotectants that were tested, it is
479
important to observe that lactose (a typical excipient used in lung delivery) revealed
480
absolutely inefficient as cryoprotectant agent, not preventing particle aggregation after
481
freeze-drying. This poor protective effect was also observed in a previous work of the group
482
with other polysaccharide-based nanoparticles (Dionísio, Cordeiro, Remuñán-López, Seijo,
483
Rosa da Costa & Grenha, 2013) and was further reported in the literature, being attributed to
484
an ineffective protection during the freezing step (Hirsjärvi, Peltonen & Hirvonen, 2009).
485
Sucrose, glucose and trehalose (in this order) are suggested to have better ability as
486
cryoprotectants, as their presence provided a more adequate maintenance of the initial
487
characteristics of nanoparticles, at least under certain conditions. Sucrose maintained the
488
exact characteristics of nanoparticles when used at 10% (with the already mentioned
489
exception of the 4 mg/mL concentration of nanoparticles) or at 5% when nanoparticles are
490
freeze-dried at the lower concentration tested. A very satisfactory cryoprotective effect
491
provided by both glucose and sucrose was previously reported by our group regarding the
492
stabilisation of two formulations of pullulan-based nanoparticles (sulfated pullulan/chitosan
493
and carrageenan/aminated pullulan) (Dionísio, Cordeiro, Remuñán-López, Seijo, Rosa da
494
Costa & Grenha, 2013). The concentration of the cryoprotectant is also an important
495
parameter to optimise. In this regard, a content of 5% was generally found to be enough to
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
471
22 Page 22 of 53
stabilise nanoparticles freeze-dried at a concentration of 1 mg/mL, while an increase to 10%
497
of cryoprotectant is needed when the nanoparticle concentration increases to 2 mg/mL.
498
Considering the results obtained with unloaded nanoparticles, BSA-loaded nanoparticles at
499
the concentration of 1 and 2 mg/mL were freeze-dried with 10% of both glucose and sucrose.
500
The physicochemical characteristics of the nanoparticles were still maintained (data not
501
shown). However, it was previously referred that the use of glucose as cryoprotectant of
502
protein formulations should be cautious because of its reducing character (Li, Patapoff,
503
Overcashier, Hsu, Nguyen & Borchardt, 1996; Wang, 2000). Nevertheless, the freeze-drying
504
of protein nanocarriers in presence of glucose has been reported as efficient, considering both
505
the physicochemical stability of the carrier and the maintenance of protein properties
506
(Freixeiro et al., 2013). In any case, a comprehensive review on the subject suggests that any
507
evaluation should be performed on a case-by-case basis (Wang, 2000).
508
This study evidences the suitability of using freeze-drying to obtain nanoparticles in a dry
509
form, but it reinforces the importance of carefully selecting and optimising the conditions of
510
the freeze-drying process in order to achieve an optimised protective effect.
cr
us
an
M
d
te
Ac ce p
511
ip t
496
512
3.4. Microencapsulation of nanoparticles
513
The success of inhalable formulations is primarily dependent on their aerodynamic
514
properties, as these influence both the dispersion and sedimentation pattern of the carriers
515
(Sung, Pulliam & Edwards, 2007). When a systemic action is intended, the drug carriers
516
should be small enough to pass through the mouth, throat and conducting airways and reach
517
the deep lung, but not so small that they fail to deposit and are breathed out again. In this
518
context, it has been considered that an aerodynamic diameter between 1 and 5 µm is
519
necessary (Bosquillon, Lombry, Préat & Vanbever, 2001), which in some cases is even
520
narrowed to 2-3 µm (Oberdörster, Oberdörster & Oberdörster, 2005). A specific conjugation
23 Page 23 of 53
between size and density of the carriers is, thus, necessary. The pulmonary administration of
522
nanoparticles is severely hindered by their low inertia, which makes alveolar deposition
523
practically impossible, mainly resulting in the exhalation of the carriers (Sung, Pulliam &
524
Edwards, 2007). The spray-drying of CS-based nanoparticles was first reported by Grenha et
525
al. (2005) as a strategy to endow the nanoparticles with the ability to reach the deep lung.
526
This strategy was later on followed by other groups (Li, Sun, Gong, Liu, Zuo & Zhang, 2010;
527
Pourshahab, Gilani, Moazeni, Eslahi, Fazeli & Jamalifar, 2011). In the present work, the
528
microencapsulation of CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles was approached to obtain a drug delivery
529
system that permitted efficient administration of the developed nanocarriers aimed at the
530
systemic pulmonary delivery of proteins. Mannitol was selected to compose the matrix of
531
microparticles, as it has demonstrated to simply act as carrier of nanoparticles, providing their
532
release upon reaching the alveoli (Grenha, Seijo & Remuñán-López, 2005).
533
Microencapsulated nanoparticles were produced by spray-drying a suspension of
534
mannitol/nanoparticles (80/20, w/w), evidencing a spherical shape and a slightly corrugated
535
surface, as can be observed in Figure 1B. The nanoparticle carriers were determined to have a
536
Feret diameter of 2.3 ± 0.6 µm, a real density of 1.44 ± 0.01 g/cm3 and a tap density of 0.42 ±
537
0.04 g/cm3. The aerodynamic diameter was determined to be 1.80 ± 0.11 µm. Comparable
538
results were reported for microencapsulated CS/TPP nanoparticles (Grenha, Seijo &
539
Remuñán-López, 2005), a system that already demonstrated its efficacy in vivo for the
540
administration of insulin (Al-Qadi, Grenha, Carrión-Recio, Seijo & Remuñán-López, 2012).
541
Good indications are thus provided on the capacity of the developed system to act as carrier
542
of nanoparticles to the lung with the aim of a systemic delivery of proteins. Nevertheless,
543
using this approach of microencapsulating the nanoparticles could possibly pose an extra
544
limitation, regarding the high proportion of excipients that need to be used and, consequently,
545
the inherent lower loading. Taking into account that administrations of around 160 – 180 mg
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
521
24 Page 24 of 53
of dry powder have been reported (Hoppentocht, Hagedoorn, Frijlink & de Boer, 2014;
547
Labiris, Holbrook, Chrystyn, Macleod & Newhouse, 1999) and considering a protein loading
548
of 27% in nanoparticles and the 20% amount of nanoparticles in the final microparticle
549
formulation, 160 mg would carry approximately 9 mg of protein. This amount is considered
550
suitable for the purpose of obtaining a therapeutic effect and will possible not compromise
551
the success of the formulation, which will obviously be dependent on several other
552
parameters.
cr
ip t
546
us
553
3.5. In vitro biocompatibility study
555
Evaluating the biocompatibility of drug delivery formulations is nowadays a mandatory
556
aspect to address (Gaspar & Duncan, 2009). While an accurate determination of the toxicity
557
of a formulation can only be determined in vivo, a variety of in vitro toxicological assays,
558
performed in adequately selected cell lines, might provide very useful information and are
559
widely accepted as first indicators (ISO, 2009; Rodrigues, Dionísio, Remuñán-López &
560
Grenha, 2012). Current international guidelines require the evaluation to be contextualised
561
with a specific route of administration and dose of the material (Gaspar & Duncan, 2009). It
562
is also referred that polymers and polymer-based carriers should be regarded as different
563
entities and, thus, evaluated separately (Aillon, Xie, El-Gendy, Berkland & Forrest, 2009;
564
Gaspar & Duncan, 2009; Williams, 2008). This is based on the assumption that the proper
565
carrier structure, among other parameters, might affect the final toxicological behaviour
566
(Aillon, Xie, El-Gendy, Berkland & Forrest, 2009; Gaspar & Duncan, 2009).
567
To address the above mentioned issues, the evaluation of the biocompatibility of
568
CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles and corresponding raw materials, was performed in this study by
569
means of three different assays, 1) the metabolic activity (MTT), 2) the inflammatory
570
response (detection of IL-6 and IL-8) and 3) the epithelial integrity (measurement of TER).
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
554
25 Page 25 of 53
Calu-3 and A549 were the selected cell lines, as they are representative of the respiratory
572
epithelia. Calu-3 is an immortalised cell line obtained from lung adenocarcinoma and has
573
been extensively used in the study of formulations designed for either nasal or pulmonary
574
drug delivery, as it is considered a model of the epithelium of both regions (Casettari,
575
Vllasaliu, Mantovani, Howdle, Stolnik & Illum, 2010; Grainger, Greenwell, Lockley, Martin
576
& Forbes, 2006; Zhu, Chidekel & Shaffer, 2010). Importantly, Calu-3 cells form tight
577
junctions in vitro (Winton et al., 1998) and, under suitable culture conditions, exhibit in vivo-
578
like barrier properties (Grainger, Greenwell, Lockley, Martin & Forbes, 2006). A549 is a cell
579
line representative of the alveolar epithelium, obtained from human alveolar adenocarcinoma,
580
showing no ability to form functional tight junctions in culture (Forbes & Ehrhardt, 2005;
581
Foster, Yazdanian & Audus, 2001; Winton et al., 1998). Consequently, it cannot be used in
582
studies of the epithelial barrier integrity, although this does not prevent their use in
583
cytotoxicity studies.
cr
us
an
M
d te
584
ip t
571
3.5.1. Evaluation of metabolic activity (MTT assay)
586
The MTT assay provides an evaluation of the cell metabolic activity upon exposure to the
587
samples and has been used very frequently in the assessment of drug delivery carriers
588
(Rodrigues, Dionísio, Remuñán-López & Grenha, 2012). It evaluates the ability of the cells
589
to reduce the MTT reagent to tetrazolium salts, an action that is dependent on mitochondrial
590
metabolism. A reduction of cellular metabolic activity is generally accepted as an early
591
indicator of cellular damage (Scherließ, 2011).
592
In this work, A549 and Calu-3 cells were cultured and exposed to different concentrations of
593
nanoparticles and raw materials for both a short (3h) and a more prolonged period (24h). The
594
exposure for 3h did not lead to significant decrease in cell viability, with values remaining
595
close to 90-100% in all cases. The only exception occurred for A549 cells exposed to
Ac ce p
585
26 Page 26 of 53
chitosan (data not shown), an effect commented later. In contrast, the prolongation of
597
exposure up to 24h induces some variability on cell viability. In this manner, for the contact
598
time of 24h a factorial design was approached to examine the effect of sample type (raw
599
materials/carrier formulations; X1) and concentration (X2) on cell viability (Y), for each cell
600
line. The two factors (X1, X2) of the experimental design have three levels each, resulting in
601
nine factor/level combinations.
602
Cell viability results obtained upon 24h exposure are depicted in Figures 4 (Calu-3 cells) and
603
5 (A549 cells). For Calu-3 cells, an unbalanced FD was used in the group of raw materials
604
and formulations. For the raw materials (Figure 4A), a significant effect (p < 0.05) was
605
detected for each of the main factors (X1 and X2) and their interaction (X1*X2). The most
606
relevant observation is that TPP induced a greater decrease of cell viability as compared to
607
CS and CRG (p < 0.05).
608
With respect to the formulations, the factorial experiment reveals that only X1 (type of
609
materials) and the two-way interaction X1*X2 are statistically significant (p < 0.05). Although
610
the lowest viability induced by raw materials was observed for the highest concentration of
611
TPP (1.0 mg/mL, Figure 4A), cell viability upon contact with CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles
612
was above 95% in all instances (Figure 4B), no concentration-dependent effect being
613
observed. In this manner, as a cell viability of 70% is the threshold beyond which a cytotoxic
614
effect is considered to occur according to ISO 10993-5 (ISO, 2009), the observed effects are
615
devoid of physiological relevance. This indicates that Calu-3 cells do not evidence a
616
particular sensitivity to any of the tested samples, either raw materials or nanoparticle-based
617
formulations, at the tested concentrations.
618
In A549 cells, a balanced FD of the raw materials showed a significant effect for both main
619
factors (X1 and X2) and their interaction (X1*X2). Among raw materials only CRG and TPP
620
show a significant difference between the concentration levels (p < 0.05), cell viability
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
596
27 Page 27 of 53
decreasing with increasing concentrations, particularly at the concentration of 1 mg/mL
622
(Figure 5A). Nevertheless, cell viabilities were higher than 70% in all conditions tested for
623
both polymers. The most deleterious effect was observed for chitosan (p < 0.05), which
624
induced high cytotoxicity, as was also detected upon 3h, even at the lower concentration of
625
0.1 mg/mL.
626
The different response of both cell lines to CS exposure (in Calu-3 cells no viability decrease
627
was observed) is most probably related with the different structures evidenced by Calu-3 and
628
A549 cells in culture and with their sensitivity to pH alterations. In fact, while Calu-3 cells
629
are rounder, A549 cells grow according to a more extended profile, as can be easily seen in
630
ATCC webpage (Collection, 2012). Chitosan used in this work is a base and, therefore, is
631
dissolved in acetic acid (pH around 3.2) to assemble the nanoparticles. The same solution was
632
used in the assay, although it was previously diluted with CCM. Upon addition to the cell
633
layer, it was observed on the microscope that A549 cells begin to detach, an effect not
634
perceived for Calu-3 cells. Therefore, the cells are no longer attached to the plate and are
635
easily removed during the washing steps even before the MTT reagent is added, not
636
permitting a reliable measure of the metabolic activity. This indicates that these results should
637
be taken with precaution. Importantly, although there are not many studies testing chitosan
638
solutions in A549 cells, the literature reports an absence of overt toxicity of the polymer in
639
this cell line at concentrations similar to those used in this study, although a different chitosan
640
polymer (regarding molecular weight and salt) was used (Huang, Khor & Lim, 2004).
641
The behaviour of A549 cells regarding the tested drug delivery systems was generally similar
642
to that of Calu-3 cells, evidencing a very favourable profile. The statistical details of the FD
643
showed that both main effects (X1 and X2) and their interaction (X1*X2) are significant (p