From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on September 11, 2016. For personal use only.

How I Treat How I treat Burkitt lymphoma in adults Caron Jacobson and Ann LaCasce Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is an aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is almost uniformly associated with translocations involving the gene for MYC on chromosome 8. The 3 subtypes of BL, endemic, sporadic, and immunodeficiencyassociated, differ from epidemiologic and clinical perspectives but may be genetically

similar. Prompt administration of multiagent immunochemotherapy regimens is associated with favorable outcomes for the majority of patients. Survival is inferior in older patients, likely reflecting increased therapy-related toxicity, possibly resulting in decreased treatment intensity. Central nervous system prophylaxis, tumor lysis

prevention and treatment, and management of infectious complications from myelosuppressive regimens are critical. Prognosis of refractory or relapsed disease is poor and patients are best treated on clinical trials when available. (Blood. 2014;124(19):29132920)

Case BG is a 40-year-old man with past medical history significant for type 2 diabetes, obesity, and hypertension who presented with hemoptysis. After receiving antibiotics for presumed sinusitis, he was started on prednisone with worsening bleeding. Subsequent laryngoscopic evaluation revealed a nasopharyngeal mass (4.8 3 2.2 cm on magnetic resonance imaging). On biopsy, the histologic appearance and immunophenotype (CD20 and CD10 positive, bcl-2 negative) were consistent with Burkitt lymphoma (BL). Fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed t(8;14). Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) revealed additional sites of disease in the liver and bone. Bone marrow biopsy showed 25% involvement. He had no fevers but complained of nondrenching sweats and 10-pound weight loss. Laboratory studies were notable for normal creatinine and complete blood count. Uric acid and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were elevated at 9.1 mg/dL and 538 U/L, respectively.

Introduction BL is a highly aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with a doubling time of 25 hours. It is characterized by deregulation of the gene encoding MYC as a result of a chromosomal translocation most commonly involving the MYC gene locus on chromosome 8 and the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) locus on chromosome 14 (t(8;14)). The first description of this disease was by Sir Albert Cook in 1887, although the disease was later described and defined by Dr Denis Burkitt in the 1950s.1,2 Today, we recognize 3 distinct subtypes of BL: endemic (African) BL, sporadic BL, and immunodeficiencyassociated BL.

Epidemiology Endemic BL is highly prevalent, with ;3 to 6 cases per 100 000 children per year in equatorial Africa.3 The incidence of endemic BL, Submitted June 24, 2014; accepted September 11, 2014. Prepublished online as Blood First Edition paper, September 25, 2014; DOI 10.1182/blood-201406-538504.

BLOOD, 6 NOVEMBER 2014 x VOLUME 124, NUMBER 19

which is uniformly Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positive, has increased, coincident with an increase in HIV infection and malaria.4 Although Plasmodium falciparum is not felt to be oncogenic, the geographic colocalization of endemic BL and malaria has led to speculation that coinfection with P falciparum relates to the oncogenic potential of EBV.5 Although HIV infection is associated with an increased risk of immunodeficiency-associated BL, these lymphomas are often EBV negative. Sporadic BL is rare, accounting for 30% of pediatric lymphomas, and ,1% of adult NHLs in the United States and Europe, or 2 to 3 cases per million persons per year.6,7 It is more common in younger individuals, with a peak incidence at 11 years of age in pediatric patients, and at 30 years of age in adults.8 Whites have a higher incidence of the disease, and men are more commonly affected at 3 to 4:1.6,9,10 These lymphomas are EBV-associated only 10% to 20% of the time. Finally, immunodeficiency-associated BL is prevalent among patients with HIV infection, as opposed to patients with other causes of immunodeficiency. Because BL can develop regardless of a patient’s CD4 count, the incidence of immunodeficiency-associated BL has not declined in the era of antiretroviral therapy.11

Pathobiology Genetics and pathogenesis

The discovery of the hallmark translocation t(8;14)in BL led to an appreciation of the role of MYC in human cancers.12-14 This translocation brings MYC under the control of IgH enhancer elements, resulting in its constitutive expression. BL typically has a simple karyotype.15 However, this translocation alone is not sufficient for malignant transformation and additional synergistic mutations are required.16-18 Many of these mutations, although common in BL, are uniformly absent in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and are therefore felt to be pathogenic. Thirty-eight percent of sporadic BL harbor mutations in the CCND3 gene encoding cyclin D3, which regulates the G1 to S transition during the cell cycle.18 Additional © 2014 by The American Society of Hematology

2913

From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on September 11, 2016. For personal use only. 2914

JACOBSON and LaCASCE

common mutations include mutations that downregulate the activation of the proapoptotic protein, Bim19; inactivating mutations in TP53 (35%); deletions or inactivating mutations in CDKN2A, encoding p16 (17%)18; and mutations involving TCF-3 (E2A) and/or its negative regulator ID3.16-18 Gene expression profiling of BL reveals a pattern that is similar to normal germinal center centroblasts.15,20,21 Normally, centrocytes in the germinal center demonstrate a MYC gene expression pattern which is lost as centrocytes become centroblasts, perhaps due to repression by BCL6.22,23 The translocation involving MYC in BL results in the loss of upstream BCL6 binding sites and inappropriate MYC expression. MYC may augment the transcription of genes characteristic of the centroblast phenotype, and/or activate additional genes normally lacking in the centroblast. A majority of all BL harbor TCF-3 and/or ID3 mutations, and all BLs depend on TCF-3 for survival and proliferation, including cases in which these genes are not themselves mutated.17,18 The TCF-3 transcriptional program may endow the centrocyte-derived BL cell with a centroblast gene expression pattern.18 GEP in BL differs from DLBCL, with BL demonstrating higher expression of MYC target genes and a subgroup of germinal center B-cell genes, and decreased expression of major histocompatibility complex class I genes and NFkB target genes.15,20 Micro-RNA profiles from each of the BL subtypes are fairly homogenous and are distinct compared with DLBCL.24 Although nearly all endemic BL, and a minority of sporadic BL, are EBV positive, the exact mechanism whereby EBV is pathogenic is not fully understood. EBV-encoded latency proteins expressed in EBV-transformed but nonmalignant lymphoblastoid cell lines modulate pathways such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3 kinase) and NFkB.25,26 However, BL primarily expresses the latent viral protein EBNA1, which is not clearly oncogenic in transgenic mouse models.27 One hypothesis is that cells expressing only EBNA1 are selected for because cells expressing other latent viral proteins are selected against by T cells that are specific for these other latent viral proteins, and that EBNA1-positive cells have been sufficiently transformed such that they are no longer dependent on these latent viral proteins for survival.28 Pathology

Biopsies of BL demonstrate complete effacement of the normal tissue architecture by sheets of atypical lymphocytes which are mediumsized and highly monomorphic with round nuclei, multiple prominent nucleoli, and basophilic cytoplasm with prominent cytoplasmic lipid vacuoles. Interspersed among these atypical lymphocytes are benign histiocytes that are large and irregularly shaped and have ingested apoptotic tumor debris, which gives the classic “starry sky” appearance (Figure 1). The growth fraction, as measured by Ki-67, approaches 100%. In addition, BL cells are positive for IgM surface immunoglobulin (sIg) and surface light chains (k . l), CD19, CD20, CD22, CD79a, CD10, BCL6, HLA-DR, and CD43. They are negative for CD5, BCL-2, TdT, and CD23. BCL6 staining is independent of a translocation involving the BCL6 gene. EBV-associated BL will express CD21, the EBV/C3d receptor. MYC gene rearrangement is detected in up to 95% of BL with 80% of cases harboring a t(8;14) translocation. Fifteen percent and 5% of cases demonstrate translocations involving either the k light chain gene on chromosome 2 (t(2;8)) or the l light chain gene on chromosome 22 (t(8;22)), respectively.13,15,29 Five percent of lymphomas that otherwise meet the morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features of BL do not harbor a MYC gene rearrangement.30 The chromosomal breakpoints differ between endemic and sporadic BL, with the IgH joining

BLOOD, 6 NOVEMBER 2014 x VOLUME 124, NUMBER 19

region and the region just upstream of the MYC gene involved in endemic cases as opposed to the IgH switch region and intron 1 of the MYC gene in sporadic cases.31 Although EBV-negative BL exhibits low levels of somatic hypermutation and no signs of antigen selection, suggestive of an early centrocyte, EBV-positive BL has higher levels of somatic hypermutation and evidence of antigen selection so may arise from a B cell later in development.32 The histopathology and immunohistochemical profile of BL is distinct from DLBCL and B-cell lymphoma unclassifiable with features intermediate between BL and DLBCL (B-cell lymphoma unclassifiable with features intermediate between BL and DLBCL [B-UNC]/BL/DLBCL) (Table 1). DLBCL is more heterogeneous with larger cells that resemble either centroblasts, or immunoblasts, which are larger cells with very prominent nucleoli and abundant cytoplasm, often with plasmacytoid features. Like BL, DLBCL expresses pan-B-cell markers including CD19, CD20, CD22, and CD79a. A majority express sIg, usually IgM, and BCL6.33 Unlike BL, these lymphomas can express BCL2, and rarely CD30 or CD5.34-36 CD10 expression and Ki67 staining are variable. B-UNC/BL/ DLBCL is characterized by intermediate/large cells with a high Ki67 index and are uniformly CD101. They differ from BL in that the cells are more variable in size, are often BCL21, and can be BCL61/2 and have a lower Ki67 index (;90%). Both DLBCL and B-UNC/BL/ DLBCL can harbor translocations involving the MYC gene on chromosome 8, but whereas the partner gene is the IgH gene on chromosome 14 in 80% of BL cases, the partner is variable in these 2 entities. DLBCL and B-UNC/BL/DLBCL can be classified as “double hit” lymphomas, in 10% and 30% to 45% of cases, respectively, when they have coincident translocations involving the MYC gene and a second translocation, commonly involving the BCL2 gene, and these lymphomas are associated with a poor prognosis.37

Clinical presentation and initial evaluation Given the doubling time of this lymphoma, patients with BL typically present with rapidly enlarging masses and evidence of spontaneous tumor lysis and high serum LDH levels. Sporadic BL has a predilection for involving the abdomen and involves the bone marrow and central nervous system (CNS) in 30% and 15% of cases, respectively. Endemic BL classically presents with a jaw or facial bone tumor; it has a tendency to spread to extranodal sites but bone marrow involvement at presentation is uncommon. Immunodeficiencyassociated BL principally involves lymph nodes, the bone marrow, and the CNS but may also present with peripheral blood involvement.30 The initial evaluation of patients with BL determines the extent and prognosis of the disease. Pathologic diagnosis should be made by an experienced hematopathologist expert in lymphomas, given the overlap between this and other aggressive B-cell lymphomas (see Table 1). Laboratory evaluation includes a complete blood count and metabolic panel with liver function tests, as well as an LDH and uric acid. Testing for HIV and hepatitis B is indicated. Staging includes not only a CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, but may also include a PET scan. A bone marrow biopsy is indicated, as is a staging lumbar puncture with cerebrospinal fluid analysis for cytology and flow cytometry, often with the administering of intrathecal (IT) therapy. The Murphy staging system, developed for the staging of childhood NHL, is predictive of outcomes; disease can also be classified as low or high risk based on the number of sites and bulk of disease, and LDH.38,39 Given the use of anthracyclines in treatment,

From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on September 11, 2016. For personal use only. BLOOD, 6 NOVEMBER 2014 x VOLUME 124, NUMBER 19

ADULT BURKITT LYMPHOMA

2915

Figure 1. Histopathology of BL. Low-power (A) and high-power (B) field hematoxylin and eosin stain; CD20 (C), CD10 (D), MYC (E), and Ki67 (F) immunostains. Illustration by Scott Rodig, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School.

a pretreatment assessment of cardiac function is indicated. If there is evidence of spontaneous tumor lysis as evidenced by an elevated uric acid level, hyperphosphatemia, hyperkalemia, and an elevated LDH, patients should be started on allopurinol and IV hydration and rasburicase should be considered prior to beginning therapy. In reported clinical trials, the prognosis for BL is generally favorable, with median survivals of 75% to 90% with modern

chemoimmunotherapy regimens.40,41 An analysis of the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was less encouraging, however, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 56%, and better survival seen in younger patients with lower risk disease (87% and 71% for patients aged 0-19 years and for patients with low-risk disease, respectively).42,43 The impact of age on outcomes is likely multifactorial and reflects increased treatment toxicity or

Table 1. Histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and genetics of BL, DLBCL, and B-UNC/BL/DLBCL BL Histopathology

Medium-sized and highly monomorphic

DLBCL Heterogeneous with larger cells; vesicular

cells; multiple prominent nucleoli;

chromatin; multiple peripheral nucleoli;

basophilic cytoplasm; prominent

narrow rim of basophilic cytoplasm.

B-UNC/BL/DLBCL Intermediate to large neoplastic cells but monomorphic.

cytoplasmic vacuoles. Interspersed benign histiocytes (classic “starry sky” appearance). Ki67 index .95%.

Ki67 variable but usually ,90%.

Ki67 intermediate between BL and DLBCL

CD19, CD20, CD22, CD79a, CD10,

CD19, CD20, CD22, and CD79a positive.

CD19, CD20, CD33, CD79a positive.

BCL6 positive 60%-70% of time.

BCL6 variable but often positive.

but high (;90%). Immunohistochemistry

BCL6, HLA-DR, and CD43 positive. BCL-2, CD5, TdT, and CD23 negative.

BCL2, CD10, CD5, CD30 and CD5 variable.

Uniformly CD10 positive. Commonly BCL2 positive.

Genetics

t(8;14) 80%;

No single cytogenetic change that is typical.

t(2;8) 15%;

translocations involving MYC and

t(8;22) 5% No translocation involving BCL6 or BCL2.

“Double hit” cytogenetics with coincident another locus, most often BCL2

“Double hit” cytogenetics with coincident translocations involving MYC and another locus, most often BCL2 10%.

B-UNC/BL/DLBCL, B-cell lymphoma unclassifiable with features intermediate between BL and DLBCL.

30%-50%.

From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on September 11, 2016. For personal use only. 2916

BLOOD, 6 NOVEMBER 2014 x VOLUME 124, NUMBER 19

JACOBSON and LaCASCE

Table 2. Regimens and outcomes for the upfront therapy of BL Reference

Regimen

N

Median age, y

Risk

TRM

EFS/PFS

40

CODOX-M/IVAC

41 (20 adults)

25

High risk

0

2-y EFS

45

CODOX-M/IVAC

52

35

High risk

5

2-y EFS

83%

92%

77% 46

CODOX-M/IVAC

47

CALGB regimen

53

37

High risk

48

Cohort 1

52

44

Cohort 2

40

50

CALGB regimen

105

44

73%

9

2-y PFS

2-y OS

64%

67%

10

3-y EFS

3-y OS

55% IPI $ 3

7

47% 49

HyperCVAD

26

58

High LDH

41

R-HyperCVAD

31

46

High LDH

50

LMB regimen

72

33

High LDH 60%,

51

DA-REPOCH

19 (HIV2)

25 44

High LDH 82%

2-y OS 78% 3-y OS

61%

49%

1

3-y EFS

3-y OS

80%

89%

0

2-y EFS

2-y OS

65%

70%

0

EFS*

OS*

95%

100%

37% 11 (HIV1)

2-y EFS 3-y CCR

IPI $ 2 54%

SC-REPOCH-RR

54% 50%

5

100%

51

52% 45% 74%

70%

High LDH

2-y OS

65%

79% IPI $ 3

OS

0

EFS†

OS†

90%

100%

CALGB, Cancer and Leukemia Group B; CCR, continuous completer remission; CODOX-M/IVAC, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, methotrexate, ifosfamide, etoposide, cytarabine; CVAD, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone; DA-REPOCH, dose-adjusted rituximab, etoposide, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin; EFS, event-free survival; IPI, International Prognostic Index; IVAC, ifosfamide, etoposide, cytarabine; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LMB, lymphoma malign B; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; SC-REPOCH-RR, short-course REPOCH with a double dose of rituximab; TRM, treatment-related mortality. *Median follow-up 86 mo. †Median follow-up 73 mo.

decreased treatment intensity in older individuals, as well as the potential misclassification of disease in this population.

Initial therapy The optimal initial therapy of BL has not been clearly defined given the paucity of randomized studies in this uncommon disease. Multiple intensive regimens demonstrate excellent activity in BL and are composed of doxorubicin, alkylators, vincristine, and etoposide combined with therapy directed at the eradication and/or prevention of CNS disease (Table 2). In the late 1980s, Magrath and colleagues developed CODOXM/IVAC (cyclosphosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, methotrexate, ifosfamide, cytarabine and etoposide) given that more than half of children and adults treated with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) with methotrexate experienced disease recurrence.40,44 Patients with low-risk disease, defined as a single mass of ,10 cm or completely resected abdominal disease with normal LDH received 3 cycles of CODOX-M. All other patients received 2 cycles each of CODOX-M and IVAC. Toxicity was typified by severe myelosuppression and infections, including sepsis. Forty-one patients, including 20 adults, with a median age of 25 years, were treated and the event-free survival (EFS) was 92% at 2 years.40 Subsequent studies of CODOX-M/IVAC in adult patients with BL demonstrate good activity of the combination, though the outcome of adult patients is inferior compared with that of children and young adults. The inclusion of patients with atypical BL almost certainly contributes to the lower OS, as evidence suggests that a portion of these patients may have double hit lymphomas. In 52 adult patients with BL, median age 35 years, treated with CODOXM/IVAC, the 2-year OS in low- and high-risk patients, as defined by the original Magrath study, was 82% and 70%, respectively.45 As

expected, severe myelosuppression was universal, and 20% of patients were unable to complete all therapy. In a subsequent study, investigators reduced the dose of methotrexate to 3 gm/m2 for patients younger than 65 years of age and 1 gm/m2 for patients older than 65 years of age and also reduced the dose of cytarabine in older patients to 1 gm/m2.46 Fifty-three patients with a median age of 37 years were treated. The 2-year progression free survival for all patients was 55% and was 85% and 49% for low- and high-risk patients, respectively. Similarly, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) developed a regimen consisting of a prephase of cyclophosphamide and prednisone, followed by 3 cycles each of ifosfamide, methotrexate, vincristine, cytarabine, etoposide, dexamethasone alternating with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone. Initially, patients received 2400 cGy of cranial irradiation and 12 doses of IT chemotherapy.47 Given severe neurologic toxicity, the study was amended and only patients with marrow involvement received radiotherapy (RT) and the number of IT doses decreased to 7. The 5-year OS in 92 patients was 52%. In a follow-up study, 105 patients were treated with the addition of rituximab in cycles 2 to 7.48 The 2-year EFS and OS were 74% and 78%, respectively. Toxicity was significant with 7 therapy-related deaths. The group at MD Anderson developed HyperCVAD to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and BL. Patients receive 4 cycles each of hyperfractionated cyclophosphosphamide with doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone alternating with 4 cycles of metotrexate and high-dose cytarabine. In their initial study of 26 adults, 5 patients died during induction. The 3-year OS was 49% and was 77% and 17% for patients under and over 60 years of age, respectively.49 In a subsequent prospective study of 31 patients treated with rituximab plus HyperCVAD, the 3-year OS was significantly improved at 89%.41 Seventy-three percent of patients completed all therapy and severe myelosuppression was universal. Multiple groups in Europe have used ALL regimens in BL. The French LMB group treated 72 patients, median age 33 years, with L3

From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on September 11, 2016. For personal use only. BLOOD, 6 NOVEMBER 2014 x VOLUME 124, NUMBER 19

ALL and BL with a risk-adapted regimen.50 Patients with resected stage I or stage II abdominal disease (8%) were treated with 3 cycles of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubin. Patients with high-risk disease (22%) defined as marrow and/or CNS disease received 8 courses of therapy including a prephase and highdose methotrexate, cytarabine, and etoposide with IT methotrexate. All other patients (70%) received 5 cycles of therapy similar to the high-risk patients. The 2-year EFS and OS were 65% and 70%, respectively. In a regimen designed to preserve efficacy while reducing toxicity, Dunleavy and colleagues studied the infusional regimen, doseadjusted EPOCH (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, adraimycin) plus rituximab (DA-REPOCH).51 CNS prophylaxis consists of 8 doses of IT methotrexate with additional doses for patients with leptomeningeal involvement. HIV-positive patients received 1 cycle beyond complete remission (3-6 cycles) and were not dose adjusted. All other patients received 2 cycles past complete remission (6-8 cycles). Thirty patients were treated, including 11 with HIV. With a median follow-up of .6 years, the DA-REPOCH patients achieved a freedom from progression of 95% and OS of 100%. The failure-free survival and OS in the SC-EPOCH-RR (short-course REPOCH with a double dose of rituximab) patients were 100% and 90%, respectively.51 Febrile neutropenia rates were low and no treatment related deaths occurred. Although the results of the DA-REPOCH regimen are excellent, the patients treated in the study were quite favorable. The median age of the HIV-negative patients was 25 years. Overall, 53% of patients had an elevated LDH at baseline, including only 37% of the HIV-negative patients, and only 1 patient had CNS disease. A confirmatory multi-institutional study is currently ongoing. In addition, the European HOVON group is conducting a randomized study of DA-REPOCH vs CODOX-M/IVAC.

Role of rituximab The impact of rituximab has not been as well studied in BL compared with many other B-cell NHLs. Preliminary results of a large randomized study in 257 adults comparing the LMB regimen with and without rituximab demonstrated significant improvement in 3-year EFS and OS in the rituximab containing arms at 76% vs 64% and 82% vs 71%, respectively.52 Toxicity was comparable in both groups. In comparing the 2 HyperCVAD trials, the outcome in the rituximabcontaining study was clearly superior.41,49 Both a lower median age and improvements in supportive care over time, however, may also have contributed to the better outcome in the R-HyperCVAD study. In addition, Barnes et al also compared outcomes in 80 patients treated with CODOX-M/IVAC with or without rituximab and found a trend toward improved survival with PFS and OS of 74% vs 61% and 77% vs 66%, respectively.53

Stem cell transplantation Several studies have evaluated the role of autologous transplantation for patients in first remission. Forty-three patients with BL were treated with various relatively less-intensive induction regimens, 27 of whom underwent transplant with the majority of remaining patients having chemorefractory disease.54 The 3-year EFS and OS were 42% and 45%, respectively. These results highlight the importance of the rapid

ADULT BURKITT LYMPHOMA

2917

institution of aggressive, multiagent chemotherapy. The HOVON group evaluated brief initial high-dose chemotherapy consisting of 2 cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, mitoxantrone, and prednisone followed by autologous stem cell transplantation using carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) conditioning. The 5-year EFS and OS for 27 patients was 73% and 81%, respectively.55 A retrospective analysis of 117 patients with BL who underwent autologous stem cell transplant between 1984 and 1994 in first remission revealed an OS of 53% at 3 years. Disease status at transplant was predictive of outcome with 3-year OS of 72% for those in first complete remission, 37% for patients with chemotherapy-sensitive, and only 7% for those with chemotherapy-resistant disease.56 For patients who underwent upfront autologous stem cell transplant, the PFS appears to be comparable to aggressive chemotherapy alone.

Relapsed or refractory disease Patients with BL who fail initial chemotherapy typically experience progressive disease during or soon after the completion of upfront treatment. Unfortunately, few studies have evaluated salvage regimens in this setting, and the majority of patients have already received the most active agents in this disease. As above, patients with chemotherapy-sensitive disease may achieve long-term remissions, but the outcome of patients with chemotherapy-resistant disease is dismal.56

HIV-positive BL Several recent studies suggest that patients with HIV-related BL experience similar outcomes compared with HIV-negative patients when treated with the same intensive chemotherapy regimens. In the majority of studies, with the exception of REPOCH, patients receive concurrent highly active antiretrovirals.51 One hundred eighteen patients (80 HIV-negative and 38 HIV-positive) were treated with intensive chemotherapy plus rituximab.57 Patients with nonbulky stage I-II disease received 4 cycles of treatment and all others received 6 cycles, and dose reductions were applied to patients .55 years of age. The 4-year disease free survival and OS were not significantly different in HIV-positive compared with HIV-negative patients at 77% and 63% vs 80% and 78%.

Recommendation In patients younger than 60 years of age, including those with wellcontrolled HIV, and those up to 70 years of age with good baseline functional status, previously normal marrow reserve and immune status without significant underlying cardiac or renal dysfunction, we favor the modified-Magrath regimen.58 Patients with extensive disease and elevated LDH receive 2 cycles each of R-CODOX-M and R-IVAC (Table 3). For patients with low-risk disease, defined as a single site of disease ,10 cm with a normal LDH, we administer 3 cycles of R-CODOX-M. Although the regimen is associated with significant toxicity, the inclusion of high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine provides excellent therapy and prophylaxis against disease involving the CNS. One minor alteration in the regimen, suggested by the AIDS Malignancy Consortium, is to administer high-dose

From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on September 11, 2016. For personal use only. 2918

BLOOD, 6 NOVEMBER 2014 x VOLUME 124, NUMBER 19

JACOBSON and LaCASCE

Table 3. Modified Magrath regimen of R-CODOX/R-IVAC Chemotherapy

Day of administration

R-CODOX Rituximab, 375 mg/m2 Cyclophosphamide, 800 mg/m2 Doxorubicin, 50 mg/m2 Vincristine, 1.4 mg/m2 (cap 2 mg) Peg-filgrastim, 6 mg Methotrexate, 3000 mg/m2 IT methotrexate, 12 mg/cytarabine, 50 mg IT cytarabine, 50 mg

D1* D1, D2 D1 D1, 15 D3 D15† D1 D3**

Patients with baseline CNS disease should receive in addition (cycle 1 only): IT cytarabine, 50 mg

D5

IT methotrexate, 12 mg

D15

R-IVAC Rituximab, 375 mg/m2

D1

Ifosfamide, 1500 mg/m2 (with MESNA)

D1-D5

Etoposide, 60 mg/m2

D1-D5

Cytarabine, 2000 mg/m2 every 12 hours

D1-D2

IT methotrexate, 12 mg

D5

Peg-filgrastim

D6

Patients with baseline CNS disease should receive in addition (cycle 1 only): IT cytarabine, 50 mg

D3

IT methotrexate, 12 mg

D5

IVF, intravenous fluid; O, vincristine; Peg, pegylated. *During cycle 1, rituximab should be administered no earlier than day 3. **For high risk patients only. †Methotrexate is administered as a bolus over 2 to 4 hours once urine pH . 7. Leucovorin 200 mg/m2 IV given once 24 hours later and then 15 mg/m2 every 6 hours until level is ,0.1. IVF with 3 amps of sodium bicarbonate should be administered until methotrexate has cleared.

methotrexate on day 15 after giving peg-filgrastim on day 3.59 By doing so, methotrexate is not administered during the nadir from CODOX when patients are susceptible to the development of febrile neutropenia. R-IVAC is administered following count recovery and clearance of methotrexate, typically on day 22. Approximately 21 days following the initiation of R-IVAC, the absolute neutrophil count and platelets have reached 1500 and 100 000, respectively, and patients start cycle 2 of R-CODOX-M. The first dose of rituximab should be delayed until at least day 3 in patients with elevated LDH to minimize the risk of tumor lysis and infusional reactions. Growth factors and blood product support are necessary to maintain dose intensity, which is critical for this highly aggressive disease. Patients must receive tumor lysis prophylaxis with aggressive hydration and allopurinol. Patients with LDH .2 times the upper limit of normal, renal dysfunction who cannot tolerate brisk intravenous fluids, or patients who develop evidence of active tumor lysis should receive rasburicase. Intensive supportive care is critical with careful monitoring of cytopenias and nearly all patients will require blood product support. Febrile neutropenia is a frequent complication, particularly after R-IVAC, and patients must be counseled to seek immediate medical attention with fevers and antibiotic prophylaxis, particularly directed against gram-negative bacteria, should be considered. For patients with preexisting organ dysfunction, or significant comorbidities and patients older than 60 years of age with low-risk disease, defined as low volume disease with a normal LDH, we prefer DA-REPOCH. In patients who are not candidates for more aggressive approaches and who have leptomeningeal disease or are at high risk for CNS recurrence with circulating disease, we consider

incorporating high-dose systemic methotrexate, as we have seen patients with CNS recurrence with IT therapy only. The optimal timing, however, has not been well studied and the intercalation of methotrexate between cycles of REPOCH may impact the ability to appropriately dose escalate, and/or lead to delays in initiating the subsequent cycle. One option is to administer IT therapy during REPOCH and then administer systemic methotrexate upon the completion of cycle 6. On occasion, a patient with BL will present with hyperbilirubinemia as a result of hepatic infiltration by disease and cannot receive doxorubicin or vincristine, given both drugs are metabolized by the liver. In this situation, we use the CALGB prephase of cyclophosphamide (200 mg/m2 3 5 days) with 100 mg/m2 of prednisone for 7 days.47 At the completion of the cycle, the bilirubin has typically normalized and we then initiate CODOX-M/IVAC. We also use the prephase in patients with very high white counts due to circulating disease and extensive marrow infiltration by lymphoma to prevent severe tumor lysis. With the availability of rasburicase, the incidence of tumor lysis syndrome has decreased. During cycle 1, we withhold rituximab until at least day 3, but often until cycle 2, as patients with significant disease burden are likely to experience severe infusionrelated events. For relapsed or refractory disease in patients who have not received prior cytarabine, regimens such as dexamethasone, cytarabine, cisplatin or etoposide, methylprednisolone, cytarabine, cisplatin may be considered. Gemcitabine-based regimens, such as gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin, are an option for patients who have received cytarabine. Unfortunately, the vast majority of patients will not respond to additional chemotherapy. Responders should undergo stem cell transplantation, but the outcome for patients with active disease at the time of transplant is dismal. We encourage patients to consider well-designed clinical trials, though given the rapid progression of disease in BL, many will not be eligible. The bromo and extra terminal (BET) bromodomain inhibitors which target MYC are currently in clinical trials and may eventually improve outcomes in newly diagnosed and relapsed patients.60

Case B.G. was treated with CODOX. Rituximab was attempted on day 3 but was complicated by a grade 3 infusion reaction. His symptoms rapidly resolved and his LDH normalized by day 16 when he received methotrexate and vincristine with rituximab. He went on to complete the full course of 2 cycles each of R-CODOX-M/IVAC. His course was complicated by febrile neutropenia and pancytopenia after both cycles of R-IVAC, as well as reversible acute kidney injury, likely secondary to antibiotics. He achieved a complete remission.

Conclusion BL is a highly aggressive disease, driven by the overexpression of MYC, with a favorable outcome when treated with intensive multiagent chemotherapy and rituximab. Therapy is toxic and results in significant myelosuppression and potentially life-threatening complications. Current studies are under way to compare less-intensive therapy to more traditional approaches. Novel therapies targeting MYC and other contributing pathways, including inhibitors of BET

From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on September 11, 2016. For personal use only. BLOOD, 6 NOVEMBER 2014 x VOLUME 124, NUMBER 19

bromodomain and PI3 kinase hold the promise of further improving outcomes in BL.

Acknowledgments Dr Scott Rodig from Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School supplied and prepared the representative pathology images for Figure 1.

ADULT BURKITT LYMPHOMA

2919

Authorship Contribution: C.J. and A.L. both wrote and edited equal portions of this manuscript. Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests. Correspondence: Ann LaCasce, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215; e-mail: ann_lacasce@ dfci.harvard.edu.

References 1. Burkitt D. A sarcoma involving the jaws in African children. Br J Surg. 1958;46(197):218-223. 2. Burkitt D, O’Conor GT. Malignant lymphoma in African children. I. A clinical syndrome. Cancer. 1961;14:258-269. 3. Magrath I. Epidemiology: clues to the pathogenesis of Burkitt lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2012;156(6):744-756. 4. Orem J, Mbidde EK, Lambert B, de Sanjose S, Weiderpass E. Burkitt’s lymphoma in Africa, a review of the epidemiology and etiology. Afr Health Sci. 2007;7(3):166-175. 5. Rochford R, Cannon MJ, Moormann AM. Endemic Burkitt’s lymphoma: a polymicrobial disease? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3(2):182-187. 6. Morton LM, Wang SS, Devesa SS, Hartge P, Weisenburger DD, Linet MS. Lymphoma incidence patterns by WHO subtype in the United States, 1992-2001. Blood. 2006;107(1):265-276. 7. Sant M, Allemani C, Tereanu C, et al; HAEMACARE Working Group. Incidence of hematologic malignancies in Europe by morphologic subtype: results of the HAEMACARE project. Blood. 2010;116(19):3724-3734. 8. Armitage JO, Weisenburger DD. New approach to classifying non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: clinical features of the major histologic subtypes. Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Classification Project. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(8):2780-2795. 9. Boerma EG, van Imhoff GW, Appel IM, Veeger NJ, Kluin PM, Kluin-Nelemans JC. Gender and age-related differences in Burkitt lymphoma—epidemiological and clinical data from The Netherlands. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(18): 2781-2787. 10. Smith A, Howell D, Patmore R, Jack A, Roman E. Incidence of haematological malignancy by sub-type: a report from the Haematological Malignancy Research Network. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(11):1684-1692. 11. Guech-Ongey M, Simard EP, Anderson WF, et al. AIDS-related Burkitt lymphoma in the United States: what do age and CD4 lymphocyte patterns tell us about etiology and/or biology? Blood. 2010;116(25):5600-5604. 12. Zech L, Haglund U, Nilsson K, Klein G. Characteristic chromosomal abnormalities in biopsies and lymphoid-cell lines from patients with Burkitt and non-Burkitt lymphomas. Int J Cancer. 1976;17(1):47-56. 13. Dalla-Favera R, Bregni M, Erikson J, Patterson D, Gallo RC, Croce CM. Human c-myc onc gene is located on the region of chromosome 8 that is translocated in Burkitt lymphoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79(24):7824-7827. 14. Taub R, Kirsch I, Morton C, et al. Translocation of the c-myc gene into the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus in human Burkitt lymphoma and murine plasmacytoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79(24):7837-7841. 15. Hummel M, Bentink S, Berger H, et al; Molecular Mechanisms in Malignant Lymphomas Network

Project of the Deutsche Krebshilfe. A biologic definition of Burkitt’s lymphoma from transcriptional and genomic profiling. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(23):2419-2430. 16. Love C, Sun Z, Jima D, et al. The genetic landscape of mutations in Burkitt lymphoma. Nat Genet. 2012;44(12):1321-1325. 17. Richter J, Schlesner M, Hoffmann S, et al; ICGC MMML-Seq Project. Recurrent mutation of the ID3 gene in Burkitt lymphoma identified by integrated genome, exome and transcriptome sequencing. Nat Genet. 2012;44(12):1316-1320.

embedded lymphoma biopsy samples. Br J Haematol. 2003;121(1):49-56. 30. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2008. 31. Pelicci PG, Knowles DM II, Magrath I, Dalla-Favera R. Chromosomal breakpoints and structural alterations of the c-myc locus differ in endemic and sporadic forms of Burkitt lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83(9):2984-2988.

18. Schmitz R, Young RM, Ceribelli M, et al. Burkitt lymphoma pathogenesis and therapeutic targets from structural and functional genomics. Nature. 2012;490(7418):116-120.

32. Bellan C, Lazzi S, Hummel M, et al. Immunoglobulin gene analysis reveals 2 distinct cells of origin for EBV-positive and EBV-negative Burkitt lymphomas. Blood. 2005;106(3): 1031-1036.

19. Hemann MT, Bric A, Teruya-Feldstein J, et al. Evasion of the p53 tumour surveillance network by tumour-derived MYC mutants. Nature. 2005; 436(7052):807-811.

33. Stein H, Lennert K, Feller AC, Mason DY. Immunohistological analysis of human lymphoma: correlation of histological and immunological categories. Adv Cancer Res. 1984;42:67-147.

20. Dave SS, Fu K, Wright GW, et al; Lymphoma/ Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project. Molecular diagnosis of Burkitt’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(23):2431-2442.

34. Hu S, Xu-Monette ZY, Balasubramanyam A, et al. CD30 expression defines a novel subgroup of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with favorable prognosis and distinct gene expression signature: a report from the International DLBCL RituximabCHOP Consortium Program Study. Blood. 2013; 121(14):2715-2724.

21. Victora GD, Dominguez-Sola D, Holmes AB, Deroubaix S, Dalla-Favera R, Nussenzweig MC. Identification of human germinal center light and dark zone cells and their relationship to human B-cell lymphomas. Blood. 2012;120(11): 2240-2248. 22. Dominguez-Sola D, Victora GD, Ying CY, et al. The proto-oncogene MYC is required for selection in the germinal center and cyclic reentry. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(11):1083-1091. 23. Calado DP, Sasaki Y, Godinho SA, et al. The cellcycle regulator c-Myc is essential for the formation and maintenance of germinal centers. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(11):1092-1100. 24. Lenze D, Leoncini L, Hummel M, et al. The different epidemiologic subtypes of Burkitt lymphoma share a homogenous micro RNA profile distinct from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leukemia. 2011;25(12):1869-1876. 25. Rowe M, Kelly GL, Bell AI, Rickinson AB. Burkitt’s lymphoma: the Rosetta Stone deciphering Epstein-Barr virus biology. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009;19(6):377-388. 26. Thorley-Lawson DA. Epstein-Barr virus: exploiting the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2001;1(1): 75-82. 27. Kang MS, Soni V, Bronson R, Kieff E. EpsteinBarr virus nuclear antigen 1 does not cause lymphoma in C57BL/6J mice. J Virol. 2008;82(8): 4180-4183.

35. Yamaguchi M, Seto M, Okamoto M, et al. De novo CD51 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a clinicopathologic study of 109 patients. Blood. 2002;99(3):815-821. 36. Gascoyne RD, Adomat SA, Krajewski S, et al. Prognostic significance of Bcl-2 protein expression and Bcl-2 gene rearrangement in diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Blood. 1997;90(1):244-251. 37. Aukema SM, Siebert R, Schuuring E, et al. Double-hit B-cell lymphomas. Blood. 2011;117(8): 2319-2331. 38. Murphy SB. Classification, staging and end results of treatment of childhood non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: dissimilarities from lymphomas in adults. Semin Oncol. 1980;7(3):332-339. 39. Murphy SB, Fairclough DL, Hutchison RE, Berard CW. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas of childhood: an analysis of the histology, staging, and response to treatment of 338 cases at a single institution. J Clin Oncol. 1989;7(2):186-193. 40. Magrath I, Adde M, Shad A, et al. Adults and children with small non-cleaved-cell lymphoma have a similar excellent outcome when treated with the same chemotherapy regimen. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(3):925-934.

28. Schmitz R, Ceribelli M, Pittaluga S, Wright G, Staudt LM. Oncogenic mechanisms in Burkitt lymphoma. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;4(2).

41. Thomas DA, Faderl S, O’Brien S, et al. Chemoimmunotherapy with hyper-CVAD plus rituximab for the treatment of adult Burkitt and Burkitt-type lymphoma or acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2006;106(7):1569-1580.

29. Haralambieva E, Banham AH, Bastard C, et al. Detection by the fluorescence in situ hybridization technique of MYC translocations in paraffin-

42. Castillo JJ, Winer ES, Olszewski AJ. Populationbased prognostic factors for survival in patients with Burkitt lymphoma: an analysis from the

From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on September 11, 2016. For personal use only. 2920

JACOBSON and LaCASCE

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cancer. 2013;119(20):3672-3679. 43. Costa LJ, Xavier AC, Wahlquist AE, Hill EG. Trends in survival of patients with Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia in the USA: an analysis of 3691 cases. Blood. 2013;121(24):4861-4866. 44. Smeland S, Blystad AK, Kvaløy SO, et al. Treatment of Burkitt’s/Burkitt-like lymphoma in adolescents and adults: a 20-year experience from the Norwegian Radium Hospital with the use of three successive regimens. Ann Oncol. 2004; 15(7):1072-1078. 45. Mead GM, Sydes MR, Walewski J, et al. An international evaluation of CODOX-M and CODOX-M alternating with IVAC in adult Burkitt’s lymphoma: results of United Kingdom Lymphoma Group LY06 study. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(8): 1264-1274. 46. Mead GM, Barrans SL, Qian W, et al; UK National Cancer Research Institute Lymphoma Clinical Studies Group; Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group. A prospective clinicopathologic study of dose-modified CODOX-M/IVAC in patients with sporadic Burkitt lymphoma defined using cytogenetic and immunophenotypic criteria (MRC/NCRI LY10 trial). Blood. 2008;112(6):2248-2260.

BLOOD, 6 NOVEMBER 2014 x VOLUME 124, NUMBER 19

duration, high intensity chemotherapy with filgrastim support for Burkitt or aggressive lymphomas: cancer and Leukemia Group B study 10 002. Br J Haematol. 2014;165(1):102-111.

sequential therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in adult Burkitt, Burkitt-like and lymphoblastic lymphoma. Leukemia. 2005;19(6): 945-952.

49. Thomas DA, Cortes J, O’Brien S, et al. Hyper-CVAD program in Burkitt’s-type adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(8): 2461-2470.

56. Sweetenham JW, Pearce R, Taghipour G, Blaise D, Gisselbrecht C, Goldstone AH. Adult Burkitt’s and Burkitt-like non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma—outcome for patients treated with high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in first remission or at relapse: results from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(9): 2465-2472.

50. Divine M, Casassus P, Koscielny S, et al. Burkitt lymphoma in adults: a prospective study of 72 patients treated with an adapted pediatric LMB protocol. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(12):1928-1935. 51. Dunleavy K, Pittaluga S, Shovlin M, et al. Low-intensity therapy in adults with Burkitt’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(20): 1915-1925. 52. Ribrag V, Koscielny S, Bouabdallah K, et al. Addition of rituximab improves outcome of HIV negative patients with Burkitt lymphom treated with the LMBA protocol: results of the randomized intergroup (GRAALL-Lysa) LMBA02 protocol [abstract]. Blood. 2012;120(21). Abstract 685. 53. Barnes JA, Lacasce AS, Feng Y, et al. Evaluation of the addition of rituximab to CODOX-M/IVAC for Burkitt’s lymphoma: a retrospective analysis. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(8):1859-1864.

57. Ribera JM, Garc´ıa O, Grande C, et al. Doseintensive chemotherapy including rituximab in Burkitt’s leukemia or lymphoma regardless of human immunodeficiency virus infection status: final results of a phase 2 study (Burkimab). Cancer. 2013;119(9):1660-1668. 58. Lacasce A, Howard O, Lib S, et al. Modified magrath regimens for adults with Burkitt and Burkitt-like lymphomas: preserved efficacy with decreased toxicity. Leuk Lymphoma. 2004;45(4): 761-767.

47. Rizzieri DA, Johnson JL, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Intensive chemotherapy with and without cranial radiation for Burkitt leukemia and lymphoma: final results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9251. Cancer. 2004;100(7):1438-1448.

54. Song KW, Barnett MJ, Gascoyne RD, et al. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation as primary therapy of sporadic adult Burkitt lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2006;133(6): 634-637.

59. Noy A, Kaplan L, Lee JY. A modified dose intensive R-CODOX-M/IVAC for HIV-associated Burkitt and atypical Burkitt lymphoma (BL) demonstrates high cure rates and low toxicity: prospective multicenter phase II trial of the AIDS Malignancy Consortium (AMC 048). Blood. 2013; 122(21). Abstract 639.

48. Rizzieri DA, Johnson JL, Byrd JC, et al; Alliance for Clinical Trials In Oncology (ACTION). Improved efficacy using rituximab and brief

55. van Imhoff GW, van der Holt B, MacKenzie MA, et al; Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON). Short intensive

60. Delmore JE, Issa GC, Lemieux ME, et al. BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to target c-Myc. Cell. 2011;146(6):904-917.

From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on September 11, 2016. For personal use only.

2014 124: 2913-2920 doi:10.1182/blood-2014-06-538504 originally published online September 25, 2014

How I treat Burkitt lymphoma in adults Caron Jacobson and Ann LaCasce

Updated information and services can be found at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/124/19/2913.full.html Articles on similar topics can be found in the following Blood collections Free Research Articles (4041 articles) How I Treat (181 articles) Lymphoid Neoplasia (2370 articles) Information about reproducing this article in parts or in its entirety may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#repub_requests Information about ordering reprints may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#reprints Information about subscriptions and ASH membership may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/subscriptions/index.xhtml

Blood (print ISSN 0006-4971, online ISSN 1528-0020), is published weekly by the American Society of Hematology, 2021 L St, NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20036. Copyright 2011 by The American Society of Hematology; all rights reserved.