JCM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 8 January 2014 J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/JCM.03009-13 Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
1
1
Title: High Frequency of Acinetobacter soli Among Acinetobacter Isolates Causing
2
Bacteremia at a Japanese Tertiary Hospital
3 4
Running title: High frequency of Acinetobacter soli
5 6
Key words: A. soli, bacteremia, rpoB, 16S rRNA, gyrB
7 8
Authors: Shiro Endo,a Hisakazu Yano,a Hajime Kanamori,a Shinya Inomata,a Tetsuji
9
Aoyagi,a Masumitsu Hatta,a Yoshiaki Gu,b Koichi Tokuda,a Miho Kitagawa,a and
10
Mitsuo Kakua
11 12
Affiliations: Department of Infection Control and Laboratory Diagnostics, Internal
13
Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryo-machi,
14
Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8574, Japana
15
Department of Regional Cooperation for Infectious Diseases, Tohoku University
16
Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8574,
17
Japanb
18 19
Address corresponding to S. Endo,
[email protected] 1
2
20
ABSTRACT
21
Acinetobacter baumannii is generally the most frequently isolated Acinetobacter species.
22
Sequence analysis techniques allow reliable identification of Acinetobacter isolates at
23
the species level.
24
Forty-eight clinical isolates of Acinetobacter spp. were obtained from blood cultures at
25
Tohoku University Hospital. These isolates were identified at the species level by partial
26
sequencing of the ribonucleic acid (RNA) polymerase β-subunit (rpoB), 16S rRNA, and
27
gyrB genes. Then further characterization was done by using the polymerase chain
28
reaction for detection of OXA-type β-lactamase gene clusters, metallo-β-lactamases,
29
and carO genes. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence
30
typing were also performed.
31
The most frequent isolate is Acinetobacter soli (27.1%). Six of the 13 A. soli isolates
32
were carbapenem non-susceptible and all of these isolates produced IMP-1. PFGE
33
revealed that the 13 A. soli isolates were divided into 8 clusters.
34
This study demonstrated that A. soli accounted for a high proportion of Acinetobacter
35
isolates causing bacteremia at a Japanese tertiary hospital. Non-A. baumannii species
36
were identified more frequently than A. baumannii and carbapenem non-susceptible
37
isolates were found among the non-A. baumannii strains. These results emphasize the
38
importance of performing epidemiological investigations of Acinetobacter species.
39 40
2
3
41
INTRODUCTION
42
Acinetobacter species are strictly aerobic, gram-negative coccobacillary rods that are
43
non-fermentive. During the last 20 years, Acinetobacter spp. have been reported to
44
cause pneumonia, sepsis, wound infection, and various opportunistic infections, and
45
these bacteria have been emerging as a cause of nosocomial infections. Because
46
Acinetobacter are resistant to various antimicrobial agents, treatment of these infections
47
can be challenging (1).
48
A. baumannii generally represents the most clinically important and frequently
49
isolated of the Acinetobacter spp. (2). However, according to a recent report from
50
Norway, Acinetobacter nosocomialis was the most frequent isolate from blood cultures
51
(3). Since the biochemical characteristics of different Acinetobacter spp. are almost
52
identical, accurate identification at the species level is difficult with routine laboratory
53
methods. Recently, some molecular techniques have been reported for identification at
54
the species level, such as sequencing of the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (16S rRNA)
55
gene, gyrB gene, recA gene, or RNA polymerase β-subunit (rpoB) gene (4–7). These
56
molecular methods have recently led to progress in the accurate identification of
57
Acinetobacter species.
58
There is the possibility of different clinical outcomes due to infection with different
59
genospecies since a difference in antibiotic susceptibility between A. baumannii and
60
non-A. baumannii has been reported, as well as differences of antibiotic resistance
61
mechanisms among Acinetobacter spp. (8–10). Accordingly, when Acinetobacter spp.
62
are isolated from a patient with a severe infection such as sepsis, it is very important to
63
accurately identify the isolate at the species level. Clinically and epidemiologically
64
valuable information is provided by investigating the prevalence, antimicrobial 3
4
65
susceptibility patterns and resistance mechanism of pathogens.
66
Therefore, this study was performed to clarify the species distribution, antibiotic
67
susceptibility profile, and carbapenem resistance mechanisms of 48 non-duplicate
68
Acinetobacter spp. causing bacteremia at a Japanese tertiary hospital.
69 70
METHODS
71
Bacterial Strains and Identification
72
Forty-eight consecutive and non-duplicate clinical isolates of Acinetobacter spp. were
73
obtained from blood cultures at Tohoku University Hospital (1,200 beds) between
74
January 2007 and April 2012. These clinical isolates were obtained from inpatients who
75
had at least two criteria for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (temperature
76
>38°C or 90 /min, respiration rate >20 /min or partial pressure of
77
carbon dioxide (PaCO2) 12,000 /mm3, 10% immature forms) (11). The isolates were identified at the genus level by
79
using the Vitek-2 System (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Japan, Tokyo, Japan).
80
Species identification of the isolates was initiated by partial sequencing of the rpoB
81
gene (zone 1) according to the method of Karah et al. (3, 4). Polymerase chain reaction
82
(PCR) products were purified with a QIA quick PCR Purfication Kit (Qiagen, Hilden,
83
Germany), followed by DNA sequencing using an ABI BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle
84
Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and an ABI3730xl
85
Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). BLASTn (http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/) was used for
86
sequence. A. soli was identified by partial sequencing of the rpoB gene (zone 2), plus
87
sequencing of the gyrB and 16S rRNA genes, as well as by sequencing zone 1 of rpoB
88
(4–7). The 16S rRNA gene sequences were analyzed by the EzTaxon-e server 4
5
89
(http://eztaxon-e.ezbiocloud.net/).
90 91
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
92
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined according to the methods
93
and breakpoints defined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (12).
94
The agar dilution method was used to obtain MICs for the following antimicrobial
95
agents: ampicillin/sulbactam (Pfizer, New York City, New York, USA), piperacillin
96
(Sigma-Aldrich), piperacillin / tazobactam (Sigma-Aldrich), cefotaxime
97
(Sigma-Aldrich), ceftazidime (Sigma-Aldrich), cefepime (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Tokyo,
98
Japan), imipenem (Banyu Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan), meropenem (Dainippon
99
Sumitomo Pharma, Osaka, Japan), gentamicin (Sigma-Aldrich), amikacin
100
(Sigma-Aldrich), levofloxacin (Daiichi Sankyo), and colistin (Sigma-Aldrich). The
101
range of concentrations tested was 0.06 to 256 μg/mL and the quality control strains
102
were Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and E. coli ATCC 35218.
103 104
Molecular Characterization of β-lactamases Genes
105
All isolates were further characterized by employing PCR for detection of the following
106
genes: OXA-51-like, OXA-23-like, OXA-24-like, OXA-58-like, OXA-143-like,
107
OXA-245-like, ISAba1/blaOXA-58-like complex, ISAba2/blaOXA-58-like complex,
108
ISAba3/blaOXA-58-like complex, IS18/blaOXA-58-like complex, metallo-β-lactamases
109
(MBL) genes (including IMP-1, IMP-2, VIM-1, VIM-2, SIM-1, and NDM-1), and the
110
carO (outer membrane protein) gene (13–17).
111 112
Sequencing of the OXA-type β-lactamase and MBL genes was performed according to the method of Pournaras et al. (18). BLASTn was used for sequence analysis. 5
6
113 114
Molecular Typing by Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis and Multilocus Sequence
115
Typing Analysis
116
The clonal relationships of A. soli isolates were determined by pulsed-field gel
117
electrophoresis (PFGE) with the SmaI restriction enzyme (19). Cluster analysis was
118
done with GelCompar II v.3.0 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium) and the
119
unweighted pair-group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA). Strains were
120
considered to belong to the same cluster if they showed ≥80% similarity of the PFGE
121
profile (20).
122
Using seven housekeeping genes (gltA, gyrB, gdhB, recA, cpn60, gpi, and rpoD),
123
multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed for all A. baumannii isolates
124
according to the method of Bartual et al. (21). DNA sequence variations were analyzed
125
by using an MLST database for A. baumannii (http://pubmlst.org/abaumanni/).
126 127
RESULTS
128
Identification of Acinetobacter Species
129
Among the 48 non-duplicate Acinetobacter spp. clinical isolates causing bacteremia, 8
130
distinct Acinetobacter genospecies were detected. The isolates included A. soli (13,
131
27.1%), A. nosocomialis (12, 25%), A. baumannii (9, 18.8%), A. ursingii (8, 16.7%), A.
132
pittii (3, 6.3%), A. genomic species "close to 13TU" (1, 2.1%), A. junii (1, 2.1%) and A.
133
guillouniae (1, 2.1%). The 13 A. soli isolates showed 99–100% similarity to
134
CCUG59023 (GenBank accession number HQ148175) with respect to the sequences of
135
zones 1 and 2 of the rpoB gene. These isolates also showed 99.5–100% similarity to A.
136
soli strain B1 (T) (GenBank accession number EU290155) with respect to the 16S 6
7
137
rRNA gene sequence and ≥97.5% similarity to JCM15062 (accession number;
138
JQ411222) for the gyrB gene sequence.
139 140
Antimicrobial Susceptibility
141
Antimicrobial non-susceptibility rates are displayed in Table 1. None of the isolates
142
showed reduced susceptibility to three or more of the antimicrobial agents tested. Of the
143
Acinetobacter spp., only one strain of A. nosocomialis was resistant to both
144
aminoglycosides and quinolones, while one strain of A. ursingii was resistant to both
145
aminoglycosides and carbapenems. In addition, 4 A. soli strains were resistant to both
146
carbapenems and quinolones.
147 148
Molecular Characterization by Polymerase Chain Reaction and Sequencing
149
The distribution of carbapenem resistance genes among Acinetobacter spp. (imipenem
150
non-susceptible isolates) is show in Table 2. PCR amplification and sequencing revealed
151
that A. soli and A. ursingii possessed blaIMP-1 and had no carO gene. Four A. soli strains
152
and 1 A. ursingii strain possessed blaOXA-58-like, but blaOXA-58-like was not linked to
153
ISAba1, ISAba2, ISAba3, or IS18. Carbapenem-susceptible non-A. baumannii species
154
had no blaOXA-51-like genes. Among isolates that were susceptible to imipenem, only
155
one A. ursingii strain possessed blaOXA-58-like, but blaOXA-58-like was not linked to
156
ISAba1, ISAba2, ISAba3, or IS18.
157 158
Molecular Typing
159
PFGE indicated that the 13 A. soli isolates were divided into 8 clusters (Fig. 1). In
160
addition, the 12 A. nosocomialis isolates were divided into 12 clusters, the 9 A. 7
8
161
baumannii isolates into 9 clusters, and the 8 A. ursingii isolates into 8 clusters. When
162
characterized by MLST, the A. baumannii isolates were divided into ST 80, 86, 144, 161,
163
163, 175, 262, and 308.
164 165
DISCUSSION
166
Acinetobacter spp. can cause severe infections in hospitalized patients with
167
compromised immune systems, including those who are dependent on medical devices.
168
During the past few years, Acinetobacter spp. have emerged as a cause of nosocomial
169
infection in Japan. However, there have been few reports about Acinetobacter from
170
Japan, despite many reports from other countries.
171
In general, the most frequent clinical isolate among Acinetobacter spp. has been
172
reported to be A. baumannii (2). Current molecular methods have revealed 27 valid
173
names within the Acinetobacter genus (22). In the present study, we used molecular
174
techniques to investigate the frequency of Acinetobacter isolates causing bacteremia at a
175
Japanese tertiary hospital. As with reports from other countries, this study showed that
176
clinical isolates of Acinetobacter spp. from blood cultures included a high percentage of
177
non-A. baumannii. The present study also revealed a high isolation rate for A. soli,
178
although there have been few reports about this microbe elsewhere in the world. A. soli
179
was first reported by Kim et al. in 2008 (4). In the present study, we identified A. soli by
180
sequence analysis of the rpoB gene (zones 1 and 2), 16S rRNA gene, and gyrB gene.
181
According to the results of our genetic analyses, 13 isolates showed an extremely high
182
similarity to A. soli (HQ148175, EU29015, JQ411222), which strongly suggested that
183
they were A. soli strains. The 13 A. soli strains isolated from blood cultures in the
184
present study were divided into 8 clusters according to PFGE (Fig. 1). Strains No. 8
9
185
10397 and 11584 (cluster A) were both isolated from patients in the intensive care unit,
186
but were isolated at different times and there was no interaction between the two
187
patients, so common hospital equipment and/or staff need to be considered in examining
188
the potential relationship between the two cluster A strains isolated from the ICU.
189
For cluster B, the timing of isolation and the department involved differed among each
190
strain. Thus, it was impossible to determine solely from PFGE analysis that any of the A.
191
soli strains in clusters A or B was responsible for an outbreak.
192
On the other hand, some of the A. soli strains isolated from patients in the intensive
193
care unit harbored IMP-1 in the present study. Unlike the chromosomal blaOXA-51-like
194
genes, mobilization of IMP metallo-β-lactamase gene via plasmids may have resulted in
195
dissemination of IMP to non-A. baumannii. For example, IMP-1 producing
196
Acinetobacter spp. were first reported among carbapenem-resistant strains carrying the
197
blaIMP-1 gene in a Brazilian hospital in 1998, and such resistance genes were detected
198
among all carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. by 2001 (23). Previously, Yamamoto
199
et al. reported on Acinetobacter isolates from certain areas of Japan and stated that
200
IMP-19 was the predominant IMP in Acinetobacter spp. (24). In the present study, on
201
the other hand, IMP-1 was predominant, and this difference between the two studies
202
suggests that the predominant IMP type may differ from region to region and that a
203
certain IMP type may easily disseminate via plasmids within a region. Furthermore, it
204
has been reported that the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance varies widely among
205
non-A. baumannii (25). This means that it is necessary to maintain surveillance for
206
carbapenem non-susceptible non-A. baumannii, including A. soli.
207 208
We found that the predominant Acinetobacter species isolated from blood cultures changed over time (data not shown). A. nosocomialis was most frequently isolated from 9
10
209
blood cultures in 2007 and then gradually became less common, while A. soli was first
210
isolated in 2008 and its isolation rate has since increased significantly. Epidemiology
211
trends must continue to be tracked.
212 213
A. baumannii is generally reported to be the carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp.
214
that causes problematic infections in many patients (9, 10). However, imipenem
215
non-susceptible A. baumannii was not isolated in the present study. The reason for this
216
may be that the number of isolates investigated was small. In addition, the prevalence of
217
imipenem-non-susceptible A. baumannii seems to be lower in Japan (26) than in other
218
countries, and the A. baumannii isolates assessed in the present study were not clustered
219
into clonal complex 92. Therefore, further research on a larger number of Acinetobacter
220
strains isolated throughout Japan is needed.
221
We previously reported that imipenem non-susceptible A. baumannii in Japan
222
possessed the OXA-51-like carbapenemase gene (26), while this study showed that
223
imipenem non-susceptible non-A. baumannii possesses metallo-β-lactamase and carO
224
gene. Thus, the possibility of a different mechanism of non-susceptibility to imipenem
225
in A. baumannii and non-A. baumannii can be suggested.
226
In conclusion, this is the first report describing a high rate of A. soli among
227
Acinetobacter spp. causing bacteremia. In addtition, the present results suggest that the
228
distribution of Acinetobacter spp. may show regional differences. Clinical microbiology
229
services need to supplement identification of Acinetobacter genomic species by
230
automated systems in order to accurately identify species for prevalence tracking and
231
for clinical treatment of patients, however there is no reliable automated systems
232
practically. Accordingly, our findings emphasize the importance of performing further 10
11
233
epidemiological investigation of Acinetobacter species.
234 235
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
236
We would like to thank the laboratory staff for their assistance.
237
FUNDING
238
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) [24590675]
239
from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; The Ministry of Education,
240
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.
241 242
COMPETING INTEREST
243
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
244
11
12
245 246
REFERENCES 1. Maragakis LL, Perl TM. 2008 Acinetobacter baumannii: epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance, and treatment options. Clin Infect Dis. 46:1254–1263.
247 248 249 250
2.
Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. 2008. Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 21: 538–582.
3. Karah N, Haldorsen B, Hegstad K, Simonsen GS, Sundsfjord A, Samuelsen Ø.
251
2011. Species identification and molecular characterization of Acinetobacter spp.
252
blood culture isolates from Norway. J Antimicrob Chemother. 66:738–744.
253
4. Kim D, Baik KS, Kim MS, Park SC, Kim SS, Rhee MS, Kwak YS, Seong CN.
254
2008. Acinetobacter soli sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. J Microbiol.
255
46:396–401.
256
5. La Scola B, Gundi VA, Khamis A, Raoult D. 2006. Sequencing of the rpoB gene
257
and flanking spacers for molecular identification of Acinetobacter species. J Clin
258
Microbiol. 44:827–832.
259
6. Gundi VA, Dijkshoorn L, Burignat S, Raoult D, La Scola B. 2009. Validation of
260
partial rpoB gene sequence analysis for the identification of clinically important and
261
emerging Acinetobacter species. Microbiology. 155:2333–2341.
262
7. Yamamoto S, Harayama S. 1995. PCR amplification and direct sequencing of
263
gyrB genes with universal primers and their application to the detection and
264
taxonomic analysis of Pseudomonas putida strains. Appl Environ Microbiol.
265
61:1104–1109.
266
8. Lee YC, Huang YT, Tan CK, Kuo YW, Liao CH, Lee PI, Hsueh PR. 2011.
267
Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter genospecies 13TU and 3 bacteraemia:
268
comparison of clinical features, prognostic factors and outcomes. J Antimicrob 12
13
269 270
Chemother. 66:1839–1846. 9. Sheng WH, Wang JT, Li SY, Lin YC, Cheng A, Chen YC, Chang SC. 2011.
271
Comparative in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities and synergistic activities of
272
antimicrobial combinations against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter species:
273
Acinetobacter baumannii versus Acinetobacter genospecies 3 and 13TU. Diagn
274
Microbiol Infect Dis. 70:380–386.
275
10. Lin YC, Sheng WH, Chen YC, Chang SC, Hsia KC, Li SY. 2010. Differences in
276
carbapenem resistance genes among Acinetobacter baumannii, Acinetobacter
277
genospecies 3 and Acinetobacter genospecies 13TU in Taiwan. Int J Antimicrob
278
Agents. 35:439–443.
279
11. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM,
280
Sibbald WJ. 1992. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the
281
use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference
282
Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care
283
Medicine. Chest. 101:1644–1655.
284
12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2010. Performance standards for
285
antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Twentieth informational supplement.
286
M100-S20, CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA.
287
13. Espinal P, Fugazza G, López Y, Kasma M, Lerman Y, Malhotra-Kumar S,
288
Goossens H, Carmeli Y, Vila J. 2011. Dissemination of an NDM-2-producing
289
Acinetobacter baumannii clone in an Israeli rehabilitation center. Antimicrob
290
Agents Chemother. 55:5396–5398.
291 292
14. Poirel L, Nordmann P. 2006. Genetic structures at the origin of acquisition and expression of the carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinase gene blaOXA-58 in 13
14
293 294
Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 50:1442–1448. 15. Bratu S, Landman D, Martin DA, Georgescu C, Quale J. 2008. Correlation of
295
antimicrobial resistance with beta-lactamases, the OmpA-like porin, and efflux
296
pumps in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii endemic to New York City.
297
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 52:2999–3005.
298
16. Higgins PG, Lehmann M, Seifert H. 2010. Inclusion of OXA-143 primers in a
299
multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for genes encoding prevalent OXA
300
carbapenemases in Acinetobacter spp. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 35:305.
301
17. Higgins PG, Pérez-Llarena FJ, Zander E, Fernández A, Bou G, Seifert H. 2013.
302
OXA-235, a novel class D β-lactamase involved in resistance to carbapenems in
303
Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 57:2121–2126.
304
18. Pournaras S, Markogiannakis A, Ikonomidis A, Kondyli L, Bethimouti K,
305
Maniatis AN, Legakis NJ, Tsakris A. 2006. Outbreak of multiple clones of
306
imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates expressing OXA-58
307
carbapenemase in an intensive care unit. J Antimicrob Chemother. 57:557–561.
308
19. Yum JH, Yi K, Lee H, Yong D, Lee K, Kim JM, Rossolini GM, Chong Y.2002.
309
Molecular characterization of metallo-β-lactamase-producing Acinetobacter
310
baumannii and Acinetobacter genomospecies 3 from Korea: identification of two
311
new integrons carrying the blaVIM-2 gene cassettes. J Antimicrob Chemother.
312
49:837–840.
313
20. Villalón P, Valdezate S, Medina-Pascual MJ, Rubio V, Vindel A, Saez-Nieto JA.
314
2011. Clonal diversity of nosocomial epidemic Acinetobacter baumannii strains
315
isolated in Spain. J Clin Microbiol. 49:875–882.
316
21. Bartual SG, Seifert H, Hippler C, Luzon MA, Wisplinghoff H, 14
15
317
Rodríguez-Valera F. 2005. Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme
318
for characterization of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. J Clin
319
Microbiol. 43:4382–4390.
320
22. Nemec A, Krizova L, Maixnerova M, van der Reijden TJ, Deschaght P, Passet
321
V, Vaneechoutte M, Brisse S, Dijkshoorn L. 2011. Genotypic and phenotypic
322
characterization of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii
323
complex with the proposal of Acinetobacter pittii sp. nov. (formerly Acinetobacter
324
genomic species 3) and Acinetobacter nosocomialis sp. nov. (formerly
325
Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU). Res Microbiol. 162:393–404.
326
23. Tognim MC, Gales AC, Penteado AP, Silbert S, Sader HS. 2006. Dissemination
327
of IMP-1 metallo- beta -lactamase-producing Acinetobacter species in a Brazilian
328
teaching hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 27:742–747.
329
24. Yamamoto M, Nagao M, Matsumura Y, Hotta G, Matsushima A, Ito Y,
330
Takakura S, Ichiyama S. 2013. Regional dissemination of Acinetobacter species
331
harbouring metallo-β-lactamase genes in Japan. Clin Microbiol Infect. 19:729–736.
332
25. Turton JF, Shah J, Ozongwu C, Pike R. 2010. Incidence of Acinetobacter species
333
other than A. baumannii among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter: evidence for
334
emerging species. J Clin Microbiol. 48:1445–1449.
335
26. Endo S, Yano H, Hirakata Y, Arai K, Kanamori H, Ogawa M, Shimojima M,
336
Ishibashi N, Aoyagi T, Hatta M, Yamada M, Tokuda K, Kitagawa M,
337
Kunishima H, Kaku M. 2012. Molecular epidemiology of
338
carbapenem-non-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii in Japan. J Antimicrob
339
Chemother. 67:1623–1626.
340 15
16
341 342
Figure legend Figure 1.
PFGE analysis of Acinetobacter soli and isolation date.
343
Isolates were divided into 8 clusters. The cutoff value for cluster delineation was 80%
344
similarity. Restriction enzyme: SmaI. Cluster analysis: GelCompar II v.3.0 and UPGMA.
345
Similarity coefficient: Jaccard. Band tolerance: 0.87%. Optimization: 0.00%.
346
16
17
347
Table 1.
Non-Susceptible Acinetobacter Species Causing Bacteremia Number of non-susceptible strains (%)
Drug / Species
A. soli
A. nosocomialis
A. baumannii
A. ursingii
A. pittii
Others
(n=13)
(n=12)
(n=9)
(n=8)
(n=3)
(n=3)a
Ampicillin / Sulbactam
8 (61.5)
2 (16.7)
0
2 (25)
1 (33.3)
0
13 (27.1)
Piperacillin
9 (69.2)
9 (75)
3 (33.3)
8 (100)
3 (100)
2 (66.7)
34 (70.8)
Total
Piperacillin / Tazobactam
10 (76.9)
6 (50)
2 (22.2)
6 (75)
3 (100)
1 (33.3)
28 (58.3)
Cefotaxime
12 (92.3)
11(91.7)
4 (44.4)
7 (87.5)
3 (100)
2 (66.7)
39 (81.3)
Ceftazidime
10 (76.9)
3 (25)
0
5 (62.5)
1 (33.3)
1 (33.3)
20 (41.7)
Cefepime
11 (84.6)
3 (25)
1 (11.1)
3 (37.5)
1 (33.3)
0
19 (39.6)
Imipenem
6 (46.2)
0
0
1 (12.5)
0
0
7 (14.6)
Meropenem
6 (46.2)
1 (8.3)
0
1 (12.5)
0
0
8 (16.7)
Gentamicin
0
2 (16.7)
0
1 (12.5)
0
0
3 (6.3)
Amikacin
6 (46.2)
1 (8.3)
1 (11.1)
1 (12.5)
0
0
9 (18.8)
Levofloxacin
6 (46.2)
1 (8.3)
1 (11.1)
0
0
1 (33.3)
9 (18.8)
Colistin
4 (30.8)
10 (83.3)
4 (44.4)
0
0
2 (66.7)
20 (41.7)
348
Breakpoints according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (12).
349
a
Other strain include A. close to 13 TU, A. junii, and A. guillouniae.
350
17
18
351
Table 2.
Characterization of Imipenem Non-Susceptible Acinetobacter spp. Causing Bacteremia MIC (μg/mL)
OXAtype-β-lactamase genes
Metallo-β-lactamase genes
Species OXA-51- OXA-23- OXA-24- OXA-58- OXA-143- OXA-245(Strain No.)
MEPM like
like
like
likea
like
like
IMP-1a IMP-2 VIM SIM-1 NDM-1
carO
A. soli (8657)
16
16
-
-
-
+b
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
A. soli (9266)
32
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
A. soli (10397)
16
16
-
-
-
-
A. soli (11013)
352
IPM
16
8
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
b
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
b
+
A. soli (11354)
16
16
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
A. soli (11584)
16
32
-
-
-
+b
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
A. ursingii (9640)
32
32
-
-
-
+b
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
Abbreviations: IPM, imipenem; MEPM, meropenem; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration.
353
IPM and MEPM were determined by the agar dilution method.
354 355
a b
Sequencing of the blaOXA-58-like and blaIMP-1 genes yielded OXA-58 and IMP-1, respectively. These were not linked to ISAba1, ISAba2, ISAba3, or IS18.
18