RESEARCH ARTICLE

Genomic landscape and evolution of metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma Jozefina Casuscelli,1,2 Nils Weinhold,3 Gunes Gundem,4 Lu Wang,5 Emily C. Zabor,4 Esther Drill,4 Patricia I. Wang,1 Gouri J. Nanjangud,6 Almedina Redzematovic,1,7 Amrita M. Nargund,1 Brandon J. Manley,8 Maria E. Arcila,5 Nicholas M. Donin,9 John C. Cheville,10 R. Houston Thompson,11 Allan J. Pantuck,9 Paul Russo,8 Emily H. Cheng,1,5 William Lee,3 Satish K. Tickoo,5 Irina Ostrovnaya,4 Chad J. Creighton,12 Elli Papaemmanuil,4 Venkatraman E. Seshan,4 A. Ari Hakimi,8 and James J. Hsieh13 Department of Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York,

1

New York, USA. 2Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany. 3Department of Radiation Oncology, 4Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 5Department of Pathology, 6Molecular Cytogenetics Core Facility, 7Department of Medicine, and 8Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA. 9Department of Urology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA. 10Department of Pathology and 11Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 12Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. 13Molecular Oncology, Department of Medicine, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) typically shows ~7 chromosome losses (1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21) and ~31 exonic somatic mutations, yet carries ~5%–10% metastatic incidence. Since extensive chromosomal losses can generate proteotoxic stress and compromise cellular proliferation, it is intriguing how chRCC, a tumor with extensive chromosome losses and a low number of somatic mutations, can develop lethal metastases. Genomic features distinguishing metastatic from nonmetastatic chRCC are unknown. An integrated approach, including wholegenome sequencing (WGS), targeted ultradeep cancer gene sequencing, and chromosome analyses (FACETS, OncoScan, and FISH), was performed on 79 chRCC patients including 38 metastatic (M-chRCC) cases. We demonstrate that TP53 mutations (58%), PTEN mutations (24%), and imbalanced chromosome duplication (ICD, duplication of ≥ 3 chromosomes) (25%) were enriched in M-chRCC. Reconstruction of the subclonal composition of paired primary-metastatic chRCC tumors supports the role of TP53, PTEN, and ICD in metastatic evolution. Finally, the presence of these 3 genomic features in primary tumors of both The Cancer Genome Atlas kidney chromophobe (KICH) (n = 64) and M-chRCC (n = 35) cohorts was associated with worse survival. In summary, our study provides genomic insights into the metastatic progression of chRCC and identifies TP53 mutations, PTEN mutations, and ICD as high-risk features. Authorship note: J. Casuscelli, N. Weinhold, and G. Gundem contributed equally to this work. I. Ostrovnaya, C.J. Creighton, E. Papaemmanuil, V.E. Seshan, and A.A. Hakimi jointly directed this work. Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists. Submitted: January 27, 2017 Accepted: May 16, 2017 Published: June 15, 2017 Reference information: JCI Insight. 2017;2(12):e92688. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci. insight.92688.

Introduction Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) consists of morphologically, molecularly, and clinically distinct subtypes, including clear cell RCC (ccRCC, ~75%), papillary RCC (pRCC, ~15%), chromophobe RCC (chRCC, ~5%), unclassified RCC (uRCC, ~5%), and few extremely rare entities such as medullary RCC (mdRCC) and MiT-translocation RCC (tRCC) (

Genomic landscape and evolution of metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) typically shows ~7 chromosome losses (1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21) and ~31 exonic somatic mutations, yet carr...
2MB Sizes 1 Downloads 11 Views