Accepted Manuscript Fluorescence quenching for chloramphenicol detection in milk based on proteinstabilized Au nanoclusters Zhijing Tan, Hua Xu, Gu Li, Xiupei Yang, Martin M.F. Choi PII: DOI: Reference:

S1386-1425(15)00581-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2015.04.109 SAA 13660

To appear in:

Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy

Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date:

11 September 2014 26 April 2015 29 April 2015

Please cite this article as: Z. Tan, H. Xu, G. Li, X. Yang, M.M.F. Choi, Fluorescence quenching for chloramphenicol detection in milk based on protein-stabilized Au nanoclusters, Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy (2015), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2015.04.109

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1

Fluorescence quenching for chloramphenicol detection in milk based on protein-

2

stabilized Au nanoclusters

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Zhijing Tana, Hua Xu a, Gu Lia, Xiupei Yanga, *, Martin M.F. Choib,1, ** a

b

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chemical Synthesis and Pollution Control Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637000, P.R. China Partner State Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, and Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Baptist University, 224 Waterloo Road, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR, P.R. China

ABSTRACT

13

In the present study, we report a simple and rapid method for sensitive and selective

14

determination of chloramphenicol (CAP) based on fluorescence of bovine serum albumin-stabilized

15

Au nanoclusters (BSA-AuNCs). The BSA-AuNCs exhibit strong red emission. Upon addition of

16

CAP to BSA-AuNCs, the fluorescence intensity of AuNCs shows a dramatic decrease attributing to

17

the photo-induced electron transfer process from the electrostatically attached CAP to the BSA-

18

AuNCs. The effects of pH, amount of BSA-AuNCs, temperature and reaction time on the detection

19

of chloramphenicol were investigated. Under the optimal conditions, trace amounts of CAP could

20

be detected. The linear working range is 0.10‒70.00 µM with a detection limit 33 nM (S/N = 3). In

21

addition, the proposed method has been successfully applied to the detection of CAP in milk

22

samples and largely improves the application of spectral method for quantitative analysis of CAP.

23 24 25

Keywords: Gold nanoclusters; Chloramphenicol; Bovine serum albumin; Fluorescence

26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

*

Corresponding author at: College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637000, PR China. Tel.: +86-817-2568081; fax: +86-817-268067. ** Corresponding author. Fax: +852-34117348. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (X. Yang), [email protected] (M.M.F. Choi). 1 Present address: Acadia Divinity College, Acadia University, 15 University Avenue, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, B4P 2R6, Canada

35

1

36 37

1. Introduction Chloramphenicol

(CAP),

namely

[D(-)-threo-2-dichloro-acetamido-1-p-nitro-phenyl-1,3-

38

propanediol], is a broad spectrum antibiotic that is widely used in animals for the treatment of

39

several infectious diseases because of its effective antibiotic active against gram-positive and gram-

40

negative microorganisms. However, research has shown that it can lead to serious adverse reactions

41

and side effects in humans such as bone marrow suppression, aplastic anemia, cardiovascular

42

collapse [1]. Many countries such as USA, Canada and China ban the use of CAP in the food

43

producing animals. The United States Food and Drug Administration recommended the “minimum

44

required performance limit” (MRPL) of CAP as 0.3 µg·kg-1 for its residues in food products [2].

45

However, CAP is still illegally used in animal farming owing to its accessibility and low cost; thus,

46

its residues have been found in various food samples such as muscle, shrimp, milk and honey [3]. In

47

order to effectively monitor the occurrence of residues of CAP, simple, specific and sensitive

48

analytical methods are required.

49

To date, there are some instrumental analytical methods of CAP in animal food samples, mainly

50

including liquid chromatography (LC) [4,5], liquid chromatography- electrospray ionization tandem

51

mass spectrometry (LC-ESI- MS/MS) [6], gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [7],

52

capillary zone electrophoresis(CZE) [8], molecular imprinted polymers [9] and electrochemical

53

sensors using variety of unmodified and modified electrodes [10-12]. Among these methods,

54

electrochemical assays are the most widely reported and numerous modified electrodes have been

55

used in CAP detection. But as we all know, their poor repeatability and complex electrode

56

modification process have limited their extensive application in real samples. HPLC and MS are

57

always used together to detect CAP. Although it is selective and sensitive, it always requires

58

expensive equipment, time-consuming extraction and toxic solvents and often involves complex

59

sample pretreatments. CZE also suffer from the defects as HPLC and MS. Therefore, how to

60

develop a simple, costless, fast and reliable assay of CAP has been a challenge for analytical

61

researchers.

2

62

Recently, fluorescence nanoclusters have stimulated extensive interest due to their significant

63

useful optical properties. They have been widely used in biosensors, biomarkers and biomedical

64

imaging [13-20]. Among these fluorescence nanoclusters, gold nanoclusters (AuNCs), an attractive

65

fluorescent probe [21-24], are the most widely used probes in biochemical analysis because of its

66

low toxicity, excellent biocompatibility and stability, good solubility, and excellent luminescence

67

properties [25]. Until now, many kinds of AuNCs with variable fluorescence emissions and

68

quantum yields have been studied. For example, Chen et al. [26] synthesized gold nanoparticles

69

stabilized by papain and applied it in the trace detection of Cu 2+. Su et al. [27] synthesized AuNCs

70

reduced by gallic acid and applied it in the detection of cyromazine. With these fluorescence

71

nanoclusters, various analytical methods have been developed for the detection of biologically

72

environmentally important molecules and ions.

73

In this work, we synthesized water-soluble AuNCs with strong fluorescence, good photostability,

74

and stimuli-responsive properties utilizing bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the protecting ligands.

75

The fluorescence of BSA-AuNCs gradually decreases with the increase in CAP concentration.

76

Herein, we report the development of a fluorescence sensing probe based on BSA-AuNCs for

77

detection of trace amounts of CAP. The analytical feature and the application of the proposed

78

fluorescence quenching method have been fully explored. The major attributes of the proposed

79

method is simple, cost-effective and convenient.

80 81

2. Experimental

82

2.1. Reagents

83

Hydrogen tetrachloroaurate(III) trihydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O, 99.9%) was purchased from Aldrich

84

(Milwaukee, WI, USA). Bovine serum albumin (BSA, 98.8%) and chloramphenicol (CAP, 99.9%)

85

were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4) was

86

obtained from Chongqing Chemical Reagents Co., Ltd. (Chongqing, P.R. China). NaOH was from

87

BeiPei Chemical Reagents Co., Ltd. (Chongqing, P.R. China). NaCl was from Chengdu Kelong

3

88

Chemical Reagents Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, P.R. China). All other reagents of analytical grade were

89

used without further purification.

90 91

2.2. Apparatus

92

Deionized water (18.3 MΩ cm specific resistances) was purified by Human UP 900 Water

93

Purification System (Seoul, Korea). Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) were acquired on a

94

Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corporation, USA). Absorption spectrum was

95

taken on a Shimadzu UV-2550 UV-vis absorption spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan). All

96

fluorescence measurements were made with a Varian Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer

97

(Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with a 1.0 cm-quartz cell.

98 99

2.3. Synthesis of fluorescent AuNCs

100

BSA-protected gold nanoclusters were prepared using procedures as described previously [28]

101

with some minor modifications. All glassware used in the experiments were washed with freshly

102

prepared aqua regia (HCl:HNO3 3:1 v/v) and rinsed with ultrapure water thoroughly and then oven-

103

dried prior to use. In a typical experiment, into 80 mL deionized water was added 1.6 mL BSA

104

solution (50 mg·mL-1) and 1.6 mL aqueous HAuCl4 solution (10 mM) under vigorous stirring at 37

105

o

C. After 2 min, 1.6 mL NaOH solution (1.0 M) was introduced into the mixture and the reaction

106

was allowed to proceed under vigorous stirring for 12 h. The concentration of BSA-AuNCs formed

107

was 0.20 mM calculated by the number of gold atoms.

108 109

2.4. Fluorescence measurement

110

Into a 5.0 mL calibrated flask was added fixed amounts of BSA-AuNCs, NaH2PO4 buffer

111

solution and CAP. The mixture was incubated 20 min at 25 oC prior to fluorescence measurement.

112

The fluorescence spectra were recorded under excitation at 260 nm and the excitation and emission

113

slits were 10 nm.

4

114 115

2.5. Sample pretreatment

116

Milk samples were bought in a local supermarket and they were pretreated prior to analysis [29].

117

In brief, 1.0 mL milk sample was accurately weighed and then 5.0 mL acetonitrile was added.

118

Afterwards, the mixture vortex for 1 min and pH was adjusted to 2 by addition of few drops of 1 M

119

HCl. The mixture was sonicated in an ultrasonic bath for 20 min and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for

120

10 min to separate the deposit in the sample matrix. The supernatant was collected and 5.0 mL n-

121

hexane was added. After 10 min shaking, the n-hexane phase was removed and the procedure was

122

repeated for 3 times. Finally, the obtained solution was evaporated to almost dryness at 40 oC. The

123

residue was dissolved in 2. 0 mL deionized water for analysis.

124 125

2.6. Chromatographic analysis

126

The determination of CAP in milk samples was verified by HPLC [30]. The chromatographic

127

analysis was performed on a Waters e2695 Series HPLC system equipped with a quaternary pump,

128

a vacuum degasser, an auto sampler, a thermostated column compartment, a Waters e2996 diode

129

array detector and an Epower data processing system to perform peak purity analyses. Separations

130

were made on a Symmetry® C18 column (150 x 4.6 mm i.d., 5 µm). The mobile phase was a

131

mixture of methanol-water (11:9 v/v) and the flow rate was 0.80 mL min−1. The column

132

temperature was set at 25 oC and the detection wavelength was fixed at 280 nm. 10.0 µL of each

133

sample solution was injected and the data was processed on the Epower Pro data processing system.

134 135

3. Results and discussion

136

3.1. Characterization of the as-prepared BSA-AuNCs

137

The BSA-AuNCs were characterized by UV-visible absorption, fluorescence and infrared

138

spectroscopy. The color of the as-prepared AuNCs solution was light brown under visible light and

139

bright-red under UV light as depicted in the inset of Figure 1A, indicating that highly luminescent

5

140

species were formed. Fig. 1A shows the UV-vis absorption (blue line) and fluorescence emission

141

(red line) spectra of the as-synthesized BSA-AuNCs. The characteristic of the fluorescence spectra

142

of BSA-AuNCs is consistent with those reported in the literature [31]. It can be concluded that the

143

size of BSA-AuNCs is less than 2 nm because the spectrum shows no surface plasmon resonance

144

band. The emission spectrum of AuNCs is in red region around 650 nm upon excitation at 260 nm.

145

Ying et al. [31] proposed that AuNCs were formed in situ by reduction of the entrapped Au ions by

146

the activated BSA molecules, and the BSA stabilized AuNCs have a common magic cluster size of

147

25 Au atoms. Finally, FTIR was used to characterize the attachment of BSA on AuNCs surface as

148

shown in Fig. 1B. The IR spectrum of the BSA-AuNCs is similar to that of BSA, except that the S-

149

H stretching band at 2550 cm-1 of BSA disappears in AuNCs, suggesting the formation of covalent

150

Au-S bond between S-H of BSA and AuNCs. This result indicated that BSA was modified on the

151

surface of AuNCs [32]. Fig. 1

152 153

3.2. The principle of the fluorescence sensor

154

The synthetic strategy for BSA-AuNCs and the principle of CAP sensing are represented in

155

Scheme 1. The as-prepared BSA-AuNCs exhibit strong fluorescence which is considered to arise

156

from intraband transitions of free electrons of the AuNCs [31]. After addition of CAP, the

157

fluorescence intensity of the AuNCs decreases significantly through a photo-induced electron

158

transfer (PET) process. These results suggest that the BSA modified Au nanoclusters could be used

159

as a facile fluorescence quenching sensor for CAP with high sensitivity based on the special

160

interaction between CAP and AuNCs. Scheme 1

161 162

3.3. Optimal conditions for CAP detection

163

In order to investigate the sensitivity, precision and selectivity of the analytical method, the

164

effects of pH, the concentration of BSA-AuNCs, reaction temperature and time of the system were

165

studied.

6

166

3.3.1. Effect of pH

167

The relationship between the fluorescence intensity of BSA-AuNCs and pH in the presence of

168

CAP is shown in Fig. 2(A). In this work, the fluorescence quenching efficiency of CAP on BSA-

169

AuNCs is defined as F0/F where F0 and F are the fluorescence intensities of BSA-AuNCs in the

170

presence and absence of CAP. The fluorescence quenching efficiency (F0/F) of the system increases

171

gradually from pH 4.0 to 5.6 and reaches the maximum at pH 5.6. Further increase in pH results in

172

the decrease in F0/F. The reason may be that chloramphenicol is slightly soluble in water and is

173

stable only in weak acid media. If the pH is too low or too high, the fluorescence quenching

174

efficiency is lower due to the lower solubility of chloramphenicol in water. At pH 5.6, maximum

175

fluorescence quenching efficiency is obtained; thus, 5.6 was chosen as the optimal pH for CAP

176

detection.

177 178

3.3.2. Effect of the amount of BSA-AuNCs

179

Fig. 2(B) displays the effect of the concentration of BSA-AuNCs for detection CAP. When the

180

amount of BSA-AuNCs is too low, the fluorescence quenching efficiency is low because of the

181

limited fluorescent molecules. When the amount of BSA-AuNCs is too high, the fluorescence

182

quenching efficiency decreases because of the self-quenching effect. The fluorescence quenching

183

efficiency is highest at 50 µM BSA-AuNCs and so it was chosen in this work.

184 185

3.3.3. Effect of reaction temperature

186

As reaction temperature is an important factor in determining fluorescence measurement, it was

187

investigated and the results are shown in Fig. 2(C). When the reaction temperature is too high or

188

low, the quenching efficiency is low. The highest quenching efficiency is obtained at 25 oC and so it

189

was selected for this work.

190 191

3.3.4. Effect of reaction time

7

192

Fig. 2(D) displays the effect of reaction time on the fluorescence quenching efficiency of CAP

193

on BSA-AuNPs. The fluorescence quenching efficiency increases with the increase in reaction time

194

(0.0‒20 min). No further increase in fluorescence quenching efficiency after 20 min of reaction time.

195

As such, 20 min was chosen as the optimal reaction time for this work. Fig. 2

196 197

3.4. Selectivity of the proposed method

198

To assess the selectivity of the BSA-AuNCs turn-off fluorescent probe for CAP, the influences

199

of co-existing foreign substances such as L-cysteine, L-serine, phenylalanine, methionine, Na+, Zn2+,

200

Ca2+, K+, Mg2+ were tested and is displayed in Fig. 3. In this study, a potential interferent was

201

initially added at a concentration of 200 times equivalent to CAP. If a significant interference was

202

found, the concentration of this interferent would be gradually reduced until no interference was

203

observed. It was found that most interferents do not produce significant interference on detection of

204

CAP at the concentrations of 100‒200 times of CAP, indicating that the proposed method is highly

205

selective to CAP and it can tolerate high levels of interferents. Fig. 3

206 207

3.5. Fluorescence detection of CAP

208

Fig. 4 shows the change in fluorescence intensity of BSA-AuNCs upon the addition of various

209

concentrations of CAP. The fluorescence intensity decreases with the increase in the concentration

210

of CAP. The inset of Fig. 4 displays the plot of F0/F against the concentration of CAP (CCAP:

211

0.0‒70.0 µM). A good linear relationship was obtained for F0/F and CCAP at 0.10‒70.0 µM: F0/F =

212

1.0719 + 0.0253 CCAP and a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9996.

213

Fig. 4

214

The limit of detection (LOD) is defined by the equation LOD=3S0/K, where S0 is the standard

215

deviation of blank measurements (n = 11) and K is the slope of calibration graph. Here LOD is 33

216

nM. The repeatability of the proposed method was also evaluated by performing a series of eleven

8

217

repetitive measurements for 10.0 µM CAP and a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 1.52% was

218

obtained. This result suggests that our assay protocol is endowed with good repeatability.

219 220

3.6. Applications

221

To test the feasibility, the proposed method was applied to determine the concentration of CAP

222

in milk samples and the results is depicted in Table 1. CAP was not found in most samples. The

223

recovery tests were done by spiking with CAP at three different concentration levels (0.50, 2.00 and

224

4.00 µM), and then analyzed following the above-described procedures. The concentrations were

225

calculated using the calibration curve. The % recoveries of 98.4‒106 and 97.8‒102% of the intra-

226

day and inter-day analyses were acceptable. The recovery data obtained by this sensor can be used

227

to confirm the accuracy of the method. The precision of the proposed sensor was also evaluated and

228

reported as % RSD of five measurements. The obtained % RSD for the intra-day and inter-day

229

analyses were 1.03‒2.78 and 2.85‒5.38%, respectively. These results confirm that the proposed

230

sensor provided good precision and could potentially be used for the detection of CAP in real

231

samples. Table 1

232 233

In order to compare the analysis of CAP by our proposed method with HPLC, parallel analyses

234

of CAP in non-spiked and spiked milk samples were performed by both methods. Table 2

235

summarizes the results of the determination of CAP in non-spiked and spiked milk samples. The

236

results obtained by our proposed method compare favorably with those obtained by HPLC method,

237

demonstrating that it is very reliable method. Table 2

238 239

3.7. Comparison with other methods

240

A comparison of detection performance between this work and other reported methods in terms

241

of sensitivity and linear range was made and summarizes in Table 3. Our developed assay exhibits a

9

242

LOD and a wider linear range. The RSDs of our proposed method is better than those reported in

243

the literatures. In addition, our method is better than some other methods in terms of the r values.

244

Our LOD is not the lowest but it can be an alternative for determination of CAP in samples as it is

245

simple, convenient and cost-effective. Table 3

246 247

4. Conclusion

248

In this work, the red-emitting BSA-capped AuNCs has been demonstrated to be a selective

249

fluorescence quenching probe for determination of trace amounts of CAP. The present method

250

exhibits a wide detection range, good selectivity, high sensitivity and is immune of coexisting

251

substances interferences. Furthermore, the practical utility of the proposed sensor has been testified

252

for the detection of trace amounts of CAP in milk samples. Our studies have proved that BSA-

253

AuNCs could be a useful luminescence material for practical uses.

254 255

Acknowledgments

256

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21277109) and the

257

Program for Young Scientific and Technological Innovative Research Team in Sichuan Province

258

(2014TD0020).

259

10

260

References

261

[1] C.R. Suarez, E.P. Ow, Pediatr. Cardiol. 13 (1992) 48.

262

[2] M. Amare, S. Admassie, Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 26 (2012) 73.

263

[3] J. Xu, W. Yin, Y. Zhang, J. Yi, M. Meng, Y. Wang, H. Xue, T. Zhang, R. Xi, Food Chem.

264

134 (2012) 2526.

265

[4] P. Vinas, N. Balsalobre, M. Hernandez, Anal. Chim. Acta 558 (2006) 11.

266

[5] M. Vosough, H.M. Esfahani, Talanta 113 (2013) 68.

267

[6] L. Rodziewicz, I. Zawadzka, Talanta 75 (2008) 846.

268

[7] L. Santos, J. Barbosa, M.C. Castilho, F. Ramos, C.A.F. Ribeiro, M.I.N. Silveira, Anal. Chim.

269

Acta 529 (2005) 249.

270

[8] W.R. Jin, X.Y. Ye, D.Q. Yu, Q. Dong, J. Chromatogr. B. 741 (2000) 155.

271

[9] N.W. Zhang, M.X. Ding, G.Y. Liu, W.W. Song, C.Y. Chai, Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 36 (2008)

272

1380.

273

[10] J. Borowiec, R. Wang, L.H. Zhu, J.D. Zhang, Electrochim. Acta 99 (2013) 138.

274

[11] F. Xiao, F.Q. Zhao, J.W. Li, R. Yan, J.J. Yu, B.Z. Zeng, Anal. Chim. Acta 596 (2007) 79.

275

[12] M. Sun, B. Ding, J.Y. Lin, J.Y. Yu, G. Sun, Sensor Actuat. B. 160 (2011) 428.

276

[13] B.A. Makwana, D.J. Vyas, K.D. Bhatt, V.K. Jain, Y.K. Agrawal, Spectrochim. Acta A 134

277

(2015) 73.

278

[14] B. Aswathy, G. Sony, Microchem. J. 116 (2014) 151.

279

[15] Y. Ling, N. Zhang, F. Qu, T. Wen, Z.F. Gao, N.B. Li, H.Q. Luo, Spectrochim. Acta A 118

280 281 282

(2014) 315. [16] S.Y. Lee, N.H.H. Bahara, Y.S. Choong, T.S. Lim, G.J. Tye, J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 433 (2014) 183.

283

[17] B.S. Li, J.J. Li, J.W. Zhao, Spectrochim. Acta A 134 (2015) 40.

284

[18] I. Lacatusu, N. Badea, A. Murariu, C. Pirvu, A. Meghea, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 357 (2011)

285

1716.

11

286

[19] K. Selvaprakash, Y.C. Chen, Biosens. Bioelectron. 61 (2014) 88.

287

[20] S. Dhanya, V. Saumya, T.P. Rao, Electrochim. Acta 102 (2013) 299.

288

[21] P. Wang, B.L. Li, N.B. Li, H.Q. Luo, Spectrochim. Acta A 135 (2015) 19.

289

[22] B. Hemmateenejad, F. Shakerizadeh, F. Samari, Sensor. Actuat. B 199 (2014) 42.

290

[23] D.T. Lu, L.L. Liu, F.X. Li, S.M. Shuang, Y.F. Li, M.M.F. Choi, C. Dong, Spectrochim. Acta

291 292 293

A 121 (2014) 77. [24] H.Z. Zheng, L. Liu, Z.J. Zhang, Y.M. Huang, D.B. Zhou, J.Y. Hao, Y.H. Lu, S.M. Chen, Spectrochim. Acta A 71 (2009) 1795.

294

[25] J.P. Wilcoxon, B.L. Abrams, Chem. Soc. Rev. 35 (2006) 1162.

295

[26] Y. Chen, Y. Wang, C.X. Wang, W.Y. Li, H.P. Zhou, H.P. Jiao, Q. Lin, C. Yu, J. Colloid.

296

Interf. Sci. 396 (2013) 63.

297

[27] H.C. Su, L.J. Chen, B. Sun, S.Y. Ai, Sensor Actuat. B 174 (2012) 458.

298

[28] J.P. Xie, J.P. Zheng, J.Y. Ying, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 888.

299

[29] L. Agüí, A. Guzmán, P. Yáñez-Sedeño, J.M. Pingarrón, Anal. Chim. Acta 461 (2002) 65.

300

[30] H.X. Chen, H. Chen, J. Ying, J.L. Huang, L. Liao, Anal. Chim. Acta 632 (2009) 80.

301

[31] J.P. Xie, Y.G. Zheng, J.Y. Ying, Chem. Commun. 46 (2010) 961.

302

[32] H.Y. Liu, X. Zhang, X.M. Wu, L.P. Jiang, C. Burda, J.J. Zhu, Chem. Commun. 47 (2011)

303

4237.

304

[33] X.H. Que, D.Y. Tang , B.Y. Xia, M.H. Lu, D.P. Tang , Anal. Chim. Acta 830 (2014) 42.

305

[34] X.X. Yu, Y. He, J. Jiang, H. Cui, Anal. Chim. Acta 812 (2014) 236.

306

[35] I. Park, N. Kim, Anal. Chim. Acta 578 (2006) 19.

307

[36] L. Codognoto, E. Winter, K.M. Doretto, G.B. Monteiro, S. Rath, Microchim. Acta 169 (2010)

308

345.

309

[37] J. Yuan, J. Addo, M. Aguilar, Y.Q. Wu, Anal. Biochem. 390 (2009) 97.

310

[38] C.M. Tang, Q.X. Huang, Y.Y. Yu, X.Z. Peng, Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 37 (2009) 1119.

311

[39] A. Aresta, D. Bianchi, C.D. Calvano, C.G. Zambonin, J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. 53 (2010) 440.

12

312 313

Table 1 Recovery test and precision of the analysis of chloramphenicol in milk samples Sample

Intra-day

Non-spiked Spiked (µΜ)

(µM)

Inter-day

Founda

Recovery

RSD

Founda

Recovery

RSD

(µM)

(%)

(%)

(µM)

(%)

(%)

1

b

ND

0.50

0.49 ± 0.01

98.4

2.78

0.50 ± 0.05

101

3.11

2

NDb

2.00

2.11 ± 0.11

106

1.52

2.04 ± 0.17

102

5.38

3

NDb

4.00

3.99 ± 0.51

99.8

1.03

3.91 ± 0.35

97.8

2.85

314

a

n = 5.

315

b

Not detected.

316

13

317

Table 2 Mean values and standard deviations for the determination of CAP in milk

318

samples by the proposed method and HPLC

Non -spiked Spiked Found (µM)a

Recovery (%)

RSD(%)

(µΜ)

(µM)

This method HPLC

This method HPLC

1

NDb

2.00

2.11 ± 0.11

2.16 ± 0.24

106

108

1.52

2.02

2

NDb

4.00

3.99 ± 0.51

4.02 ± 0.41

99.8

101

1.03

3.71

Sample

319

a

320

b

This method HPLC

n = 5. Not detected.

321

14

322

Table 3 Comparison of the proposed method with other methods for determination of

323

CAP Linear range

Method

(µΜ)

R

LOD

RSD

(µΜ)

(%)

Ref.

Electrochemical detection

2.00‒80.0

0.9985

0.59

2.84

[11]

Gold nanocatalyst-based immunosensing

0.0003‒0.3

0.9972

0.00009



[33]

Square wave voltammetry

0.10‒10.0



0.047



[29]

Luminol functionalized silver nanoprobe

0.03‒3.0

0.9970

0.024



[34]

Chemiluminescent immunosensor

0.01‒100.0



0.01



[35]

High-performance liquid chromatography

0.002‒1.5

0.9995

0.0003

4.50

[5]

FIA with amperometric detection

50.0‒1000



44.0



[36]

0.01‒6.0

0.9990

0.005



[12]





0.0001



[37]

with

5.0‒1000

0.9996

0.91



[9]

Molecularly imprinted membrane- based

0.01‒12.0

0.9870

0.002

2.50

[10]

mass

0.03‒3.0

0.9998

0.022



[38]

microextraction-liquid

0.10‒3.0

0.9997

0.1



[39]

0.10‒70.00

0.9998

0.033

1.52

This work

Voltammetry Surface plasmon resonance assay Capillary

zone

electrophoresis

amperometric detection

sensor Liquid

chromatography-tandem

spectrometry Solid

phase

chromatography Fluorescence quenching based on BSAAuNCs 324 325

15

326

Scheme 1 Scheme of the synthetic strategy for BSA-AuNCs and the principle of CA

327

sensing.

328 329

330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355

Figure Captions Fig. 1. (A) Absorbance and fluorescence emission spectra of the BSA-AuNCs. Inset: photographic images under visible light (left) and ultraviolet light (right) of the BSAAuNCs. (B) Infrared spectra of (a) BSA and (b) BSA-AuNCs.

Fig. 2. Effect of (A) pH, (B) the amount of BSA-AuNCs, (C) reaction temperature and (D) reaction time on the fluorescence intensity of BSA-AuNCs-CAP system. F0 and F are the fluorescence intensity of BSA-AuNCs in the absence and presence of 2.50 µM CAP in phosphate buffer solution (30 mM, pH = 5.6).

Fig. 3. Effect of potentially interfering substances. CAP: 30.00 µΜ; glycine, histidine, L-cysteine, lysine, phenylalanine, aspartic acid, Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+: 6.00 mM and others: 3.00 mM. The inset displays the fluorescence spectra for potentially interfering substances. 50 µM AuNCs in phosphate buffer solution (30 mM, pH = 5.6) is used

Fig. 4. The change in fluorescence intensity of BSA-AuNCs upon the addition of various concentrations of CAP. The concentrations of CAP are: (a) 0.00, (b) 0.10, (c) 1.25, (d) 2.50, (e) 5.00, (f) 10.00, (g) 20.00, (h) 30.00, (i) 40.00, (j) 50.00, (k) 60.00, and (l) 70.00 µM. The inset displays the linear plot of F0/F against CCAP concentration of CAP. 50 µM AuNCs in phosphate buffer solution (30 mM, pH = 5.6) is used.

17

Fig. 1.

356 357 358 0.8 A

0.4 400

0.2 200

0.0 0

400

500

600

Wavelength (nm)

700

800

(b) BSA-AuNCs Transmittance (%)

600

Fluorescence Intensity (a.u.)

Absorbance (a.u.)

0.6

300

B

800

4000

(a) BSA

3500

3000

2500

2000

1500 -1 Wavenumber (cm )

1000

500

18

Fig. 2.

359

1.16

1.15

A

1.14

1.14

1.12

1.13

1.10

F0/F

F0/F

B

1.08

1.12 1.11

1.06 1.10

1.04

4

5

6

7

0.00

8

0.02

0.06

0.08

0.10

CBSA-AuNPs (mM)

pH

1.16

0.04

1.16

C

D

1.14

1.14

1.12 1.10 F0/F

F0/F

1.12 1.10

1.08 1.06

1.08

1.04

1.06

1.02

0

10

20

30

40

Temperature ( C) O

50

0

5

10

15

20

25

Time (min)

360 361

19

Fig. 3.

362

1.8 1.7 1.6

F0/F

1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1

Fluorescence intensity (a.u.)

500

Gly, His, Lys, Ser, Met, Val, Leu, Hcy, Cys, Phe, Asp, Na+, Zn2+, K+,

Blank

400

Ca2+, Mg2+ CAP

300 200 100 550

600

650

700

750

800

Wavelength (nm)

1.0

Bl

an k G ly H is Ly s Ph Ae sp Se Mr et V al Le u H cy C ys N + a K+ C 2 a + Zn 2 + M g 2+ C A P

BlankGly His Lys PheAsp Ser Met Val Leu Hcy CysNa+ K+Ca2+ Zn2+ Mg2+CAP

363

20

Fig. 4.

364

F0/F

Fluorescence intensity (a.u.)

2.8 F0/F=0.0253C+1.0719 R2=0.9996 2.4

a

600

500

2.0 1.6 1.2

400

0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 CCAP (µM)

µM

l

300

200

100

0 550

600

650

700

Wavelength (nm) 365 366

750

800

367

Highlights

368

 Bovine serum albumin stabilized Au nanoclusters were synthesized in aqueous solution.

369

 The protein-stabilized water-soluble Au nanoclusters showed well fluorescence properties.

370

 A novel fluorescent sensor for chloramphenicol was proposed.

371 372

22

373

Graphical abstract

374

23

Fluorescence quenching for chloramphenicol detection in milk based on protein-stabilized Au nanoclusters.

In the present study, we report a simple and rapid method for sensitive and selective determination of chloramphenicol (CAP) based on fluorescence of ...
382KB Sizes 2 Downloads 9 Views