HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author Manuscript

OT Pract. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 06. Published in final edited form as: OT Pract. 2013 September 9; 18(16): 19–22.

Fall Prevention for Community-Living Older Adults: A Tale of Two Systematic Reviews Irene lee, MOT [OTD Candidate] and The University of Southern California Division of Occupational Science and Therapy

Author Manuscript

Natalie Leland, PhD, OTR/L, BCG, FAOTA [Assistant Professor] The University of Southern California's Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy and the Davis School of Gerontology

Author Manuscript

Falls, a significant public health issue, have been associated with many adverse health outcomes leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and institutionalization.1 Occupational therapy practitioners can play a pivotal role in addressing the multifactorial nature of falls.2 Home safety assessments and environmental modifications are areas in which occupational therapy practitioners can integrate the context and environment with the values and goals of the client to support engagement in desired occupations and minimize fall risk. Two recent systematic reviews examining fall prevention interventions for community-living older adults came to different conclusions about home safety assessments and environmental modifications. This article summarizes the home safety intervention results of these two high-quality systematic reviews, identifies the reasons for the different conclusions, and discusses the implications for occupational therapy practice.

Author Manuscript

The 2012 Cochrane Review evaluated the effects of interventions designed to reduce the incidence of falls among community-living older people.3 Nine studies (randomized control trials [RCTs] or quasi-randomized trials) meeting the study's home safety assessment and environmental intervention inclusion criteria were conducted in more than 21 countries (some studies were carried out in multiple countries), using various health care models to reduce falls. The review concluded that home assessment and modification interventions were effective in reducing the rate of falls and the risk of falling.3 Older adults with a history of falling or multiple fall risk factors (i.e., high-risk fallers) benefited more from the intervention than those with a lower risk of falling. When stratifying the analysis by the profession delivering the care, there was evidence that occupational therapy– led home safety interventions were more effective than non-occupational therapy–led interventions (e.g., those led by nurses or public health workers). The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) systematic review examined the benefits and harms of primary care fall prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults.4 This systematic review used a more narrow inclusion criterion than the Cochrane Review, focusing solely on the primary care setting. As a result, only three RCTs conducted in settings generalizable to U.S. primary care met the inclusion criteria,5 one of which restricted the study population to healthy older adults.6 The systematic review concluded that there was limited evidence supporting home-hazard modification as an intervention to reduce the risk of falling.

lee and Leland

Page 2

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

Although both studies evaluated the efficacy of home programs designed to prevent falls in community-dwelling older adults, differences in the aims of the research questions dictated the exclusion and inclusion criteria, thereby yielding dissimilar study samples and divergent conclusions. The USPSTF singularly examined studies generalizable to the U.S. primary care system, whereas the Cochrane Review used a more expansive health care context definition, to include studies that were conducted in a variety of health care contexts (e.g., acute-care hospital before discharge) and types of health care systems (e.g., socialized medicine). The definition of community living in the USPSTF study was also more focused, referring only to individuals residing in the community for the duration of the study, whereas the Cochrane Review used a broader classification, including studies that recruited participants prior to community discharge from an acute medical stay. Similarly, the Cochrane Review was more inclusive in the methodology of the intervention studies evaluated, including effectiveness trials that compared interventions with usual care, placebo control, or other fall-prevention interventions. Alternatively, the USPSTF exclusively evaluated interventions that were compared with a true control group. Due to these valid, yet different, methodological approaches, these two studies came to alternate conclusions about the effectiveness of home safety assessments for community-living older adults.

Suport for Occupational Therapy

Author Manuscript

Engaging in evidence-based practice to work with community-living older adults, clinicians can integrate either of these study findings into occupational therapy practice by using their own clinical experience and the client's values and goals to determine whether a home safety evaluation is an appropriate fall prevention strategy. The evidence does support the provision of home safety evaluations by an occupational therapy practitioner as one part of a multifactorial fall intervention. For occupational therapy practitioners in primary care, the absence of a definitive statement about the efficacy of occupational therapy does not suggest that occupational therapy home safety evaluations are inefficacious, nor does it prohibit occupational therapy practitioners from providing them in primary care. The USPSTF findings do indicate that there is an absence of research in primary care. Further, clinicians in this setting need to be cognizant of this gap as they engage in clinical decision making. In conclusion, clinicians working with older adults to prevent falls should consider all three components of evidence-based practice (i.e., their clinical experience, the client's priorities, and current evidence) when considering a home safety evaluation as a component of the plan of care.

References Author Manuscript

1. Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR. Falls and their prevention in elderly people: What does the evidence show? Medical Clinics of North America. 2006; 90:807–824. [PubMed: 16962843] 2. Peterson EW, Clemson L. Understanding the role of occupational therapy in fall prevention for community-dwelling older adults. OT Practice. 2008; 18(3):CE-1–CE-8. 3. Gillespie, LD.; Robertson, MC.; Gillespie, WJ.; Sherrington, C.; Gates, S.; Clemson, LM.; Lamb, SE. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane. Database of Systematic Reviews, 9. 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007146.pub3 4. Michael YL, Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Fu R, O'Connor EA, Gold R. Primary care—Relevant interventions to prevent falling in older adults: A systematic evidence review for the U.S.

OT Pract. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 06.

lee and Leland

Page 3

Author Manuscript

Preventative Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2010; 153:815–825. [PubMed: 21173416] 5. Michael, YL.; Lin, JS.; Whitlock, EP.; Gold, R.; Fu, R.; O'Connor, EA.; et al. Lutz, KW. Interventions to prevent falls in older adults: An updated systematic review. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010. 6. Day L, Fildes B, Gordon I. Randomised factorial trials of falls prevention among older people living in their own homes. BMJ. 2002; 325:128–131. [PubMed: 12130606]

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript OT Pract. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 06.

Fall Prevention for Community-Living Older Adults: A Tale of Two Systematic Reviews.

Fall Prevention for Community-Living Older Adults: A Tale of Two Systematic Reviews. - PDF Download Free
37KB Sizes 0 Downloads 7 Views