Transfusion Medicine Reviews 29 (2015) 90–101

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Transfusion Medicine Reviews journal homepage: www.tmreviews.com

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation—Hemostatic Complications Deirdre A. Murphy a,b,⁎, Lisen E. Hockings a,b, Robert K. Andrews c, Cecile Aubron d,e, Elizabeth E. Gardiner c, Vincent A. Pellegrino a,b, Amanda K. Davis f a

Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia d ANZIC Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia e Transfusion Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia f Department of Haematology, Alfred Hospital Melbourne, Australia b c

a r t i c l e

i n f o

Available online 18 December 2014 Keywords: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Hemostasis Hemorrhage Thrombosis Anticoagulants Fibrinolysis Disseminated intravascular coagulation

a b s t r a c t The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for cardiac and respiratory failure has increased in recent years. Improvements in ECMO oxygenator and pump technologies have aided this increase in utilization. Additionally, reports of successful outcomes in supporting patients with respiratory failure during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic and reports of ECMO during cardiopulmonary resuscitation have led to increased uptake of ECMO. Patients requiring ECMO are a heterogenous group of critically ill patients with cardiac and respiratory failure. Bleeding and thrombotic complications remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients on ECMO. In this review, we describe the mechanisms and management of hemostatic, thrombotic and hemolytic complications during ECMO support. © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Contents Mode of ECMO Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VV ECMO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Indications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VA ECMO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Central VA ECMO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Peripheral VA ECMO . . . . . . . . . . . . Indications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Membrane Oxygenators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Blood Pumps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common Hemostatic Complications Seen During ECMO Thrombosis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Configuration-Related Thrombosis . . . . . . . . . . Thrombus Deposition in the Circuit and Oxygenator . . Pump Thrombosis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia . . . . . . . . . Management of Thrombosis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Strategies for Anticoagulation . . . . . . . . . . . . Monitoring of Anticoagulation . . . . . . . . . . . . Activated Clotting Time . . . . . . . . . . . Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time . . . . Anti–Factor Xa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Antithrombin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Conflict of interest statement: None. ⁎ Corresponding author. Deirdre Murphy, MBBChBAO, Department of Intensive Care, Alfred Hospital, 3rd Floor, East Block, PO Box 315, Prahran, Victoria 3188, Australia. E-mail address: [email protected] (D.A. Murphy). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2014.12.001 0887-7963/© 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 93 93 93 94 94 94 94 95 95 95 95 95 95 95

D.A. Murphy et al. / Transfusion Medicine Reviews 29 (2015) 90–101

Thromboelastography . . . . . . . . Bleeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thrombocytopenia . . . . . . . . . Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Hyperfibrinolysis . . . . . . . . . . Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome . . Management of Bleeding . . . . . . . . . . . Use of Recombinant Factor VIIa . . . . Surgery in Patients on ECMO Support . . . . . . . . . . . Hemolysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . Summary and Future Directions . . . . . . . . References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The first case report of successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for respiratory failure was published by Hill and colleagues [1] in 1972. Since that time, there has been considerable interest in its role as supportive therapy for patients with life-threatening cardiac and/ or respiratory failure. The role of ECMO in the neonatal population has been clearly established [2–4], and a growing acceptance of ECMO in the adult population has occurred despite a lack of convincing randomized controlled trial evidence to support its use [5–8]. This expanding role has occurred in the context of advances in membrane oxygenator and pump technology, the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic and interest in the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support, particularly in patients in refractory cardiac arrest [7–15]. Hemostatic complications, both bleeding and thrombosis, remain the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in patients treated with ECMO [11,16–19]. Hematologists and transfusion specialists are increasingly being asked to help navigate the complexities of thrombotic and hemorrhagic risks that occur when blood is exposed to the extracorporeal circuit. Here, we review the current literature around the utility of ECMO with special focus on hemostatic complications commonly found in patients receiving ECMO support and include some suggested strategies to manage such hemostatic complications. Mode of ECMO Support The mode of ECMO is defined by the location of the access and return cannulae. ECMO involves accessing deoxygenated venous blood from the systemic circulation, pressurizing it using a pump, passing it through a membrane oxygenator and then returning it to either the venous side of the circulation (the right atrium) in venovenous ECMO (VV ECMO or respiratory ECMO), or to the arterial circulation (typically the aorta) in venoarterial ECMO (VA ECMO or cardiac ECMO). Pumpless arteriovenous configurations exist but tend to provide more carbon dioxide (CO2) removal than oxygenation (extracorporeal CO2 removal). They provide minimal oxygenation support and no cardiovascular support and will not be specifically addressed in this discussion. VV ECMO Indications VV ECMO is currently indicated for potentially reversible, lifethreatening respiratory failure where conventional ventilatory strategies are failing and where native cardiac function is adequate (VV ECMO provides no direct circulatory support) (Fig 1). There is growing interest in the role of ECMO in patients with chronic respiratory failure, particularly as a bridge to lung transplantation [20–22]. VA ECMO VA ECMO is used to support patients with inadequate cardiac output and patients with combined cardiac and respiratory failure. VA ECMO

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

91

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

95 95 95 96 96 96 96 97 97 98 98 98 99 99

can be either central or peripheral. The decision to use central or peripheral ECMO can be institution or patient specific. Central VA ECMO Cannulae are inserted directly via a sternotomy—with venous access into the right atrium and arterial return into the proximal aorta. This ensures oxygenation of the arterial supply to the coronary and the cerebral circulations (the most proximal branches of the aorta). Central VA ECMO can support patients with both cardiac and respiratory failure (Fig 2). Peripheral VA ECMO Cannulae are inserted into the cavae via the femoral or jugular vein approach. The return cannula is classically placed in the distal aorta via the femoral artery. Insertion may be percutaneous or open. A distal perfusion cannula is recommended to supply the limb distal to the return cannula (Fig 3). More recently, the subclavian artery has been described as an alternative return site. Indications Venoarterial ECMO is currently indicated for potentially reversible cardiogenic shock (bridge to recovery), or as a bridge to more definitive long-term cardiovascular support in patients who are suitable for ventricular assist device (VAD) or heart transplantation. Where the suitability or need for long-term support is unclear, VA ECMO may be used as a bridge to decision. Venoarterial ECMO as an adjunct to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECMO-CPR, or E-CPR) is emerging as a viable option in select patients who are refractory to conventional CPR [13–15]. Membrane Oxygenators Improvements in membrane oxygenators have facilitated the increased use of ECMO support in recent years. Current oxygenators consist of multiple polymethylpentene hollow microfibers that are permeable to gas but not liquid. They provide a very efficient surface for gas exchange with no direct blood–gas interaction. In contrast to previous generations of oxygenators designed for short-term use in cardiopulmonary bypass, they have a low priming volume and a low resistance to blood flow that has enabled the use of centrifugal rather than roller blood pumps. In addition, they are resistant to plasma leak (as occurs in microporous gas exchange membranes), allow the potential for thromboresistant coatings and have been associated with reduced clotting factor and platelet transfusion requirements [10,23–27]. Blood Pumps Both displacement (roller) and rotary (centrifugal and diagonal) pumps have been used for ECMO as well as cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). With the advent of lower resistance oxygenators, centrifugal pumps have been employed more widely. They have the advantages

92

D.A. Murphy et al. / Transfusion Medicine Reviews 29 (2015) 90–101

Fig 1. VV ECMO. Cavoatrial configuration of VV ECMO shown using bifemoral approach. Access cannula is shown percutaneously inserted via left femoral vein. Blood passes via pump to oxygenator and is returned to right atrium via cannula inserted percutaneously from right femoral vein cannula. VV ECMO provides respiratory support only. Schematic representation of blood flow in circuit demonstrating that the degree of oxygenation support provided by VV ECMO will depend on the proportion of the venous return captured.

of small priming volumes, reduced hemolysis (particularly with newer magnetically suspended rotors), allowing thromboresistant coating and enabling circuit modifications to exclude bridges and reservoirs to

minimize circuit volume (and hence size of blood: ECMO interface) and connections (that create sites of turbulent flow and potential thrombus generation) [28].

Fig 2. Central VA ECMO. Central VA ECMO configuration. Access cannula is in right atrium. Blood passes via pump to oxygenator and is returned into ascending aorta. Direction of flow in aorta is antegrade. Cannulation is performed at sternotomy. VA ECMO provides cardiac and respiratory support.

D.A. Murphy et al. / Transfusion Medicine Reviews 29 (2015) 90–101

93

Fig 3. Peripheral VA ECMO. Peripherally inserted VA ECMO configuration. Access cannula is inserted into right atrium via femoral vein approach. Return cannula is situated in external iliac artery via common femoral artery approach. A distal perfusion cannula supplies blood flow to leg and prevents ischemia. Schematic on the right shows mixing of flows as flow from native circulation will meet flow from ECMO arterial return variably in the aorta depending on the degree of left ventricular failure.

Common Hemostatic Complications Seen During ECMO Both bleeding and clotting complications can occur during ECMO support, often coexist in the same patient and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Balancing the relative risks of bleeding and thrombosis can be difficult as many factors related to the patients illness, the extracorporeal support and the balance of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory pathways will differ between patients. The common thrombotic bleeding and hemolytic complications as reported to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organisation (ELSO) Registry are detailed in Tables 1 and 2. Thrombosis Thrombosis is one of the most common and feared complications of ECMO support [19,17,25]. The true incidence of thromboembolic complications of ECMO is unknown, and autopsy studies would suggest that clinical evaluation underestimates its occurrence [18]. In the most recent annual ELSO report, clots were reported to occur in the oxygenator in nearly 13% of patients. Additional clots in other parts of the circuit were more common in patients on ECMO for cardiac support than those on for respiratory support. Central nervous system infarction was reported to occur in up to 3.5% of patients. Mechanisms ECMO necessitates contact between blood and nonendothelial surfaces and results in coagulation and fibrinolytic pathway activation and a complement-mediated inflammatory response. Although it developed from CPB, there are several differences in the nature of blood activation in ECMO patients that reduces the extent of these responses:

– Absence of surgical stimulus and minimal air–blood interface without an open surgical field – Less complex circuitry with reduced circuit volume (nonendothelial surface area) and fewer connections (sites of turbulent flow) – Less blood exposed to circuit per unit time

Table 1 Complications in patients requiring ECMO for respiratory support adapted from ELSO registry data 2014 (this includes both VV and VA ECMO)

Total nos. 1986-2013

Pediatric (1 mo–18 y)

Survived (%)

6270

57

Complication

Reported (%)

Survived (%)

Clots: oxygenator Clots: bridge Clots: bladder Clots: other CNS: infarction CNS: hemorrhage GI hemorrhage Cannula site bleeding Surgical site bleeding Hemolysis (PfHg N 0.5 g/L) DIC Cardiac tamponade Pulmonary hemorrhage

10.4 4.0 5.6 11.6 4.0 6.1 4.0 17.5 13.4 9.8 5.4 1.9 8.2

51 55 54 54 34 22 27 53 46 44 27 43 31

a

Adult (N18 y)

Survived (%)

5278

56

Reported (%)

Surviveda (%)

12.9 1.6 1.7 2.7 2.0 3.9 5.6 15.1 13.6 6 3.3 2.3 7.4

55 56 57 44 30 20 34 51 43 37 27 48 37

Total numbers are cumulative ECMO runs. Abbreviations: CNS, central nervous system; GI, gastrointestinal. a Survived = survival to discharge or transfer based on number of runs. Percentage survival describes patients with that complication who survived. Because patients who died may have had more than one complication, numbers will not total 100%.

94

D.A. Murphy et al. / Transfusion Medicine Reviews 29 (2015) 90–101

Table 2 Complications in patients requiring ECMO for cardiac support adapted from ELSO registry data 2014 Pediatric (1 mo–1 y)

Surviveda

Pediatric (1-16 y)

Surviveda

Adult (N16 y)

Surviveda

Total no.

3782

56%

3136

57%

4405

41%

Complication

Reported (%)

Survived (%)

Reported (%)

Survived (%)

Reported (%)

Survived (%)

Clots: oxygenator Clots: bridge Clots: bladder Clots: other CNS: infarction CNS: hemorrhage GI hemorrhage Cannula site bleeding Surgical site bleeding Hemolysis (PfHg N0.5 g/L) DIC Cardiac tamponade Pulmonary hemorrhage

7.9 3.1 4.1 9.9 4.4 6.0 1.9 12.3 32.6 9.8 3.3 5.2 5.1

42 38 40 43 33 30 14 40 40 33 24 36 24

7.4 2.5 2.1 10 4.4 4 2.7 18.4 28.4 8.4 3.9 5.2 6

50 51 49 55 39 20 30 54 48 44 35 49 38

9.6 0.9 0.2 6.5 3.8 2.2 4 19.8 23 7.1 4.1 5.4 3.1

41 56 45 38 22 8 24 41 34 30 24 31 29

Total numbers are cumulative ECMO runs. Abbreviations: CNS, central nervous system; GI, gastrointestinal. a Survived = survival to discharge or transfer based on number of runs. Percentage survival describes patients with that complication who survived. As patients who died may have had more than one complication, numbers will not total 100%.

Counterbalancing this is the increased duration of support [19,29,30]. Furthermore, patients requiring ECMO often have additional noncircuit-related reasons for activation of platelets and inflammatory pathways related to their underlying illness.

very important to diagnose and treat expediently as it can lead to pump stoppage. The treatment is circuit exchange with ongoing adequate anticoagulation. Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Configuration-Related Thrombosis Minimizing the size and complexity of the ECMO circuit can reduce the total nonendothelial surface area and the sites of turbulent flow that may promote thrombosis. In patients on VA ECMO with little or no native cardiac function, stasis within the pulmonary circulation and within the heart itself can lead to thrombus generation. In addition to anticoagulation strategies, it is important to maintain flow through the heart wherever possible (for example, using inotropes and adjusting ECMO flow to optimize native cardiac function). Thrombus Deposition in the Circuit and Oxygenator Thrombus deposition in the membrane oxygenator as well as elsewhere in the circuit is common and can lead to oxygenator failure and thromboembolism. The circuit and oxygenator can be monitored by visual observation (e.g., using torch). Monitoring clot burden using daily D-dimer estimation can predict developing oxygenator failure. Although D-dimers can be elevated for many reasons in patients receiving ECMO support, a sudden rise can signify incipient failure of the oxygenator and is a predictor that a circuit change is likely within the next few days [31]. Adequate function of the oxygenator is assessed by monitoring the postoxygenator pressure drop as well as postoxygenator gas exchange. We routinely use D-dimer estimation as part of our circuit assessment as elective circuit change is preferable to sudden failure of the membrane oxygenator. Pump Thrombosis The other important cause of hemolysis in a patient on ECMO is pump thrombosis. This is a relatively rare but clinically important syndrome caused by a thrombus at the pump head. It is associated with a noisy pump, frank intravascular hemolysis, and hemoglobinuria. It can develop quickly and is associated with pump failure. It is not possible to see clot at the pump head during operation of ECMO, unlike clot in the oxygenator (which can be seen with a torch). It is

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare, transient prothrombotic condition caused by circulating heparin-platelet factor 4 complex antibodies [32]. Since exposure of ECMO patients to unfractionated heparin is almost universal, the complication of HIT is important to consider. Although data are lacking on the incidence of HIT in this setting, one would expect its incidence to be similar to that seen in other critically ill patients. The issues around diagnosis and treatment have been extensively published elsewhere [33–35]. Specific points regarding treatment of confirmed or suspected HIT in patients on ECMO include removing all exposure to heparin which may include the ECMO circuit. It is important to realize that many modern ECMO circuitry components are heparin bonded (Bioline and Safeline, Maquet Cardiopulmonary AG, Hirrlingen, Germany) in an effort to ameliorate the immune response to circuit components [36–38]. The heparin in these systems is covalently bonded to albumin in the coating. It is prudent (but not often practical) to consider removal of any catheters or circuit components with heparin bonding if possible. Thus, if platelet recovery does not occur after withdrawal of heparin, it is possible that ongoing exposure from the heparin bonding is a factor [39]. Options for alterative anticoagulation in this setting include direct thrombin inhibitors (argatroban and bivalirudin) as well as fondaparinux and danaparoid [40–45]. Of course, none of these drugs have an available antidote. The direct thrombin inhibitor lepirudin is approved for use in HIT and is described for this use in ECMO patients with HIT [46,47]; however, the production of the drug was discontinued in 2011 for financial reasons. Bivalirudin may be very useful in this patient population owing to its enzymatic clearance (80% enzymatic 20% renal) and short half-life (25 minutes) [48]. However, there is a risk of thrombosis in areas of stasis due to the unique pharmacology of bivalirudin which is well described in the cardiopulmonary bypass setting [49]. The 2012 American College of Chest Physicians HIT guidelines did not provide guidance for patients on ECMO support likely due to the paucity of clinical evidence in this group. However, they recommend bivalirudin for patients with acute HIT who require urgent cardiac surgery over other nonheparin anticoagulants and over heparin plus antiplatelet agents (grade 2C) and bivalirudin (grade 2B) or argatroban (grade 2C) for patients with HIT requiring acute percutaneous coronary interventions [50].

D.A. Murphy et al. / Transfusion Medicine Reviews 29 (2015) 90–101

Management of Thrombosis Strategies for Anticoagulation The aim of pharmacologic anticoagulation is to counterbalance the effects of exposure to the nonendothelial surface of the ECMO circuit. Ideally, this would inhibit activation of platelets, coagulation, and inflammatory pathways without increasing the risk of bleeding. Critically ill patients requiring ECMO may have additional indications for anticoagulation in the context of their underlying disease that must also be considered. Unfortunately, the ideal pharmacologic anticoagulant agent remains elusive. Unfractionated heparin is the current international standard for anticoagulation during ECMO. It is inexpensive, widely available, titratable, and potentially reversible. Although other agents have been used, the overwhelming majority of international experience and data on ECMO are with heparin anticoagulation. However, there is no consensus on heparin monitoring or therapeutic targets and considerable inter-institutional variability exists [19,17,29,51–54]. The Extracorporeal Life Support Organisation has also released a specific anticoagulation guideline [55]. In addition to systemic anticoagulation, bioactive coatings of circuit components have been developed using heparin, phosphorylcholine, and polymethoxyethyl acrylate in an attempt to ameliorate the inflammatory and coagulation response to circuit exposure. These are now in widespread use [23,29,56–58]. Monitoring of Anticoagulation Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), activated clotting time, anti–factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels, thromboelastography (including rotational thromboelastography), absolute heparin dose, and/or a combination of some or all of the above are used in different centers [19,23,17,29,51,53–55]. The ideal strategy for monitoring anticoagulation is unknown. There have been several recent reviews of the issues surrounding anticoagulation monitoring on ECMO [54,55]. Activated Clotting Time Activated clotting time is a whole-blood clotting test used primarily in CPB settings but also used extensively during ECMO, particularly in pediatrics. It has a poorer relationship with aPTT at the lower levels of heparin used in ECMO compared with cardiac surgery. It is affected by heparin but also by other factors including thrombocytopenia, platelet dysfunction, antiplatelet medications, hypothermia, age, and hypofibrinogenemia [19]. Where it is used, the target suggested is usually 180 to 220 seconds [54,55]. Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Activated partial thromboplastin time has been the mainstay of laboratory-based heparin monitoring in the adult ECLS population. Therapeutic targets range is generally 1.5 to 2.5 times increase in baseline aPTT. Anti–Factor Xa Anti–factor Xa activity has been described more recently with typical target ranges quoted as 0.3 to 0.7 IU/mL. Anti-Xa has the advantage of being a measure of heparin effect as distinct from heparin concentration. It is important to note that AT levels will influence the assay and results may be inaccurate if the laboratory adds exogenous AT to the specimen [51]. Antithrombin Antithrombin (AT) is a serpin (serine protease inhibitor) present in serum that inactivates thrombin and activated factor X. The anticoagulant effect of heparin requires AT [59]. Neonates have lower levels of AT than older children and adults. Acquired deficiency in AT may

95

occur in patients on ECMO [51,60]. Heparin use prior to ECMO, hemodilution, and consumptive coagulopathy may contribute. Although AT levels decrease initially with ECMO support, a recent pediatric study showed increasing levels over time in patients on ECMO regardless of whether supplementation was used [51]. Small studies in pediatric and neonatal ECMO populations point to no increase in bleeding risk [61] or even reduced bleeding when AT supplementation is used [62]. Off-label use of AT is increasing in pediatric populations, especially in those on ECMO [63]. Practice varies between ECMO centers with regard to approach to routine monitoring of AT and replacement [55]. Some measure levels routinely and replace if monitoring suggests heparin resistance (e.g., low anti-Xa heparin levels, low activated clotting time or APTT despite escalating does of UFNH) [64]. Further research is required to describe the pattern and clinical implications of AT deficiency in ECMO support as well as target AT levels. Thromboelastography Some centers (43% of respondents of a 2013 survey of ECMO centers) use thromboelastography (TEG Haemonetics, Braintree, Massachusetts) or rotational thromboelastography (e.g., ROTEM; ROTEM International, Munich, Germany). These are whole-blood point-of-care viscoelastic clotting tests of hemostasis which describe clot formation, clot strength, and clot dissolution in real time [65]. Algorithm-directed management using TEG may reduce transfusion requirements in bleeding patients during cardiac surgery [65]. Its role in monitoring anticoagulation is less well established [64]. The appeal of these tests in their ability to demonstrate the effect of platelet and fibrinogen on overall clotting is clear, but validation of their role in large patient populations is required before they can be considered standard. In light of ongoing uncertainty in the strategies for anticoagulation and anticoagulation monitoring in patients on ECMO, a randomized pilot study is currently in progress in Australia (ACTRN12613001324707) (in patients without an additional indication for therapeutic anticoagulation) comparing an anticoagulation strategy of “standard” systemic heparin (aPTT target 50-70 seconds), and lower-dose heparin (12 000 units/24 h—adjusted for body weight and aiming for an aPTT b 45 seconds) and examining a range of anticoagulation tests. This has been designed to establish the feasibility of a larger randomized controlled trial to define the safest anticoagulation practice. Bleeding Bleeding is the Achilles heel of ECMO support. It is the leading contributor to mortality in ECMO patients in most large series and registry data [66,67]. Increase in blood product usage is independently associated with patient outcomes in both adults and pediatric case series [16,68]. Reported blood product usage in various series differs between centers and likely describes the rate of surgical procedures, transfusion triggers, practices around ECMO support, and other variables [69]. The reported requirement for blood products in the modern era has fallen compared with earlier reports [70]. This may have occurred due to improvements in ECMO technology including bioactive coatings. Despite this, it is sobering to note, however, that the main cause of mortality in the large H1N1 series reported in Australia and New Zealand in 2009 was hemorrhage. This accounted for 71% of deaths (10/64 people requiring ECMO), with intracranial hemorrhage being the cause of death in 6 of the 10 patients who died [71]. Bleeding can be seen with minor procedures and can be disproportionate to the trauma (which may be minor) and also the degree of coagulation disturbance by routine testing. Mechanisms The causes of bleeding in patients on ECMO and other forms of mechanical support are poorly understood and likely multifactorial. Hemostasis is a complex process, and there are many cellular interactions

96

D.A. Murphy et al. / Transfusion Medicine Reviews 29 (2015) 90–101

leading to adequate hemostasis that may be disturbed in patients receiving ECMO support. The groups of critically ill patients requiring ECMO are among the sickest of the intensive care unit (ICU) patient population. They frequently have multiorgan failure and may have had CPR or sepsis preceding their ECMO commencement. It is hardly surprising then that we grapple with disorders of hemostasis and thrombosis. We take critically ill patients who already have an imbalance of their procoagulant and anticoagulant pathways and commence them on support with a system causing platelet activation, inflammation, and consumption of clotting factors, utilizing large bore arterial and venous access to do so.

no single diagnostic test that characterizes DIC, but the association of thrombocytopenia with low levels of coagulation factors (which, in turn, cause prolongation of the PT and aPTT) is suggestive [79]. Low (or dropping) fibrinogen levels are suggestive. D-Dimers are frequently elevated in patients on ECMO support so less useful in this setting. Low levels of anticoagulant proteins in plasma are evidence of ongoing activation of coagulation. Low levels of protein C and AT are found in 40% to 60% of critically ill patients and in 90% of patients with DIC, in addition to low levels of tissue factor pathway inhibitor [79–81]. Scoring systems that combine some of these tests and improve the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of DIC have been proposed [82].

Thrombocytopenia Thrombocytopenia is common in critically ill patients. It occurs in 20% to 50% of ICU patients, and if moderate or severe, it is consistently associated with increased bleeding and increase in mortality [72–74]. Data on the proportion of patients receiving ECMO who have thrombocytopenia and the degree of platelet drop are lacking. As in any setting of thrombocytopenia, it is important to try and identify the cause and treat appropriately. Required thresholds for prophylactic platelet transfusion in ICU patients are generally at a platelet level above the recommended 10 to 20 × 10 9/L recommended for non-ICU patients with chemotherapy-associated thrombocytopenia given the requirements for invasive procedures and risk of bleeding [75]. Greinacher and Selleng [76] have commented that bleeding in a critically ill patient with a platelet count greater than 30 × 10 9/L points to the likelihood of an additional disturbance of hemostasis. They recommended platelet transfusion in patients who are bleeding with either primary or secondary platelet abnormalities regardless of the level of platelets. Although this is not specific to patients on ECMO, these patients are often critically ill along with the additional potential effects of a mechanical device on their platelets and in the absence of other evidence to guide practice, using this approach in ECMO patients seems to be reasonable. There is no known level of platelet count beyond which risk of bleeding increases in ECMO patients, and this risk will also depend on the patient's condition, for example, postoperative. Many centers describe targeting a platelet count greater than 100 × 10 9/L [64] (Table 3). Research to support this practice is lacking and urgently required.

Hyperfibrinolysis Fibrinogen is fundamental to clot integrity. Excessive fibrinolysis leading to bleeding is known as hyperfibrinolysis [83]. This should be suspected if bleeding is associated with very high levels of D-dimer and relatively normal platelet levels. Activation of fibrinolysis may be either a primary plasmin-mediated process or a secondary process occurring in the setting of thrombin-mediated activation. Both are commonly seen in extracorporeal support [84] and can be associated with significant bleeding in patients on ECMO. Clot deposition within the circuit including the membrane oxygenator can lead to excessive fibrinolysis characterized by steep increases in D -dimer and generalized coagulopathy-type bleeding, for example, mucous membranes. Replacing the circuit can often help to reverse this process. Bleeding due to fibrinolysis may respond to antifibrinolytics [85]. Amicar (ε-aminocaproic acid) and tranexamic acid infusions have been described in this setting in pediatric and neonatal patients receiving ECMO [86–88]. Topical tranexamic acid may be useful for mucosal bleeding.

Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation One of the causes of excessive bleeding in patients receiving ECMO is disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). This may be a feature of the severity of illness or of the underlying disorder causing the need for ECMO. In addition, extracorporeal support is associated with a DIClike consumptive coagulopathy due to tissue injury and contact activation in the artificial membrane [77]. Disseminated intravascular coagulation is an acquired disorder seen in a wide variety of conditions. It is characterized by widespread activation of coagulation resulting in fibrin deposition and microthrombi formation in small and midsized vessels. The platelet and coagulation factor consumption associated with DIC can lead to severe bleeding and, conversely, thrombosis [78]. There is

Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is a condition in which structural or functional defects in von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity occur secondarily to a variety of clinical causes (cardiovascular diseases, lymphoproliferative disorders, autoimmune conditions). It was first described as a clinical entity (Heyde syndrome) in patients with severe aortic stenosis associated with angiodysplasia-related gastrointestinal bleeding [89]. Clinically, this syndrome resembles type 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD) in which there is a qualitative defect in VWF. This presents with mucocutaneous bleeding as well as excessive bleeding in response to surgery or trauma. Diagnosis of AVWS. Difficulty arises in diagnosing AVWS because there is no single diagnostic test. A panel of laboratory tests is required, as is used in the diagnosis of hereditary VWD. Tests include coagulation screen, FVIII level, VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), collagen binding assay, ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo), and multimer analysis. Expected abnormalities in the AVWS include decreased VWF:Ag/VWF:RCo or

Table 3 Transfusion thresholds in ECMO patients Question

Responses Pediatric only programs (n = 81), median (range)

What is the low hematocrit threshold (%) you use for packed red blood cell transfusion in a typical ECMO patient? What is your typical platelet threshold (cells/μL) for platelet transfusion in an otherwise uncomplicated ECMO patient? What is your typical low fibrinogen threshold (mg/dL) for which you would administer fresh-frozen plasma or cryoprecipitate? Responses to 2010/2011 survey of ELSO units. Adapted from Bembea et al [64] with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health.

35 (25-45) 100 000 (50 000-200 000) 150 (60-200)

Adult-only and mixed adult and pediatric programs (n = 40), median (range) 30 (20-40) 100 000 (20 000-100 000) 145 (50-200)

P b.001 .034 .33

D.A. Murphy et al. / Transfusion Medicine Reviews 29 (2015) 90–101

collagen binding assay ratio and loss of high-molecular-weight VWF multimers (Fig 4). Acquired von Willebrand syndrome is well described in high-shear situations (e.g., high-velocity flow associated with aortic stenosis) [90,91]. It has been also reported in continuous flow left VADs and hypothesized to be due to high shear. Nonpulsatile or low pulsatile circulation in patients with these continuous flow devices may also be a factor [92,93]. This is associated with higher bleeding rates and reversed on removal of the pump [94,95]. Not surprisingly, there is interest in this syndrome in patients receiving ECMO [96–100]. In one study [101], AVWS was seen in 31 of 32 patients on ECMO (and none of the 19 controls evaluated). The significance of the testing abnormalities to suggest an AVWS due to ECMO requires ongoing investigation. At this stage, it appears to be a risk factor for bleeding, but this should be confirmed in further studies. Altered blood flow associated with ECMO can also potentially affect platelet activation, by either increasing the interaction of VWF with its primary receptor, glycoprotein (GP)Ibα of the GPIb-IX-V complex at elevated shear rates, or through changes in expression of platelet surface receptors such as GPIbα or the collagen receptor, GPVI, through VWF-dependent or VWF-independent pathways. In this regard, exposure of healthy platelets to elevated shear stress ex vivo induces metalloproteinase-mediated ectodomain shedding of platelet GPVI, and the shed soluble GPVI is elevated in plasma from patients with single-vessel coronary stenosis [102]. Plasma-soluble GPVI is also elevated in patients with coronary disease, immune thrombocytopenia, or disseminated intravascular coagulation, and experimentally, shedding is induced by platelet activation, antiplatelet antibodies, or coagulation (FXa dependent) ([103]. However, to date, changes in platelet receptor expression or shedding have not been analyzed in the setting of ECMO. Treatment of AVWS. Treatment will depend on the cause of the AVWS. If associated with ECMO, it is likely due to high shear and thus makes sense to try and reduce the pump speed and improve access to minimize any turbulent flow. The condition is likely to reverse on removal

97

of ECMO, so consideration should be given to whether weaning of ECMO is possible. Plasmapheresis, desmospressin, and intravenous immune globulin have all been reported for treatment of antibody-mediated AVWS [104]. They are very unlikely to be useful in patients with ECMOrelated AVWS. Desmopressin has been shown to be less useful in patients with cardiovascular causes of AVWS in the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis registry [105]. Tiede et al [106] suggest withdrawal of anticoagulants in patients with cardiovascular causes of AVWS. The role of VWF concentrates is uncertain in this setting. Antifibrinolytic drugs (oral, topical, or intravenous) have also been reported as treatment options for patients with AVWS [104]. Other topical therapies are likely to be beneficial for local bleeding. Management of Bleeding Bleeding in patients receiving ECMO support can be catastrophic and out of proportion to the degree of coagulation abnormalities and may occur after no or minor trauma. Management includes preventative strategies to prevent bleeding, cessation of anticoagulation if significant bleeding occurs as well as transfusion support, antifibrinolytics, and local measures and surgical control where required. There is a lack of evidence to guide transfusion triggers in the setting of ECMO support, but established triggers used in other critically ill patients, including massive hemorrhage, are available [107]. A suggested approach to prevent and manage bleeding is presented in Table 4. Figure 5 demonstrates simple local measures that can be used to minimize bleeding risk. Use of Recombinant Factor VIIa Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) has been proposed as a general hemostatic agent with much enthusiasm for its use in varied clinical settings including in patients receiving ECMO. Despite multiple randomized studies of its use in varied clinical settings, meta-analyses Table 4 Suggested approach for prevention and management of bleeding complications in ECMO support Suggested management approach for bleeding complications

Fig 4. VWF multimers. VWF multimer analysis. Loss of high-molecular-weight multimers of VWF in a patient on ECMO, which normalizes postdecannulation. VWF multimer pattern in the patient on ECMO is similar to that of a control sample of a patient with type 2B VWD, relative to a healthy control.

Prevent bleeding • Type of cannulation—peripheral percutaneous b peripheral cut-down b central • Avoid cutting skin with percutaneous cannulation-dilatation only approach can prevent bleeding. Sutures should be avoided as these can contribute to ongoing bleeding from suture sites. Cannulae can be secured with skin securing dressings. • Avoid procedures that can contribute to bleeding, e.g., chest drains unless necessary, and ensure experienced staff perform these. • Procedural approach to minimize bleeding risk, e.g., ultrasound-guided cannulation of vessels. Assessment of bleeding • Diagnosis of pattern of bleeding—is it localized (e.g., gastrointestinal hemorrhage, cannula site bleeding, epistaxis, and pulmonary hemorrhage) or generalized? • Measure fibrinogen, aPTT, INR, D-dimers • Search for hemostatic defects contributing if excessive or unusual pattern of bleeding ○ For example, quantitative or qualitative platelet defect, DIC, fibrinolysis, and AVWS Resuscitation • Stop anticoagulation until bleeding is controlled • Resuscitate with volume and blood products to correct any coagulopathy • Transfusion aims are not well defined in this population, but most guidelines target platelet count N75-100 × 109/L and fibrinogen N1.5 g/L in bleeding patients. Treatment • Consider surgical control or interventional radiology approaches where possible • Apply local compression to control bleeding sites, e.g., cannula sites and nasal packing • Antifibrinolytics—systemic, topical, or oral • Other local hemostatic agents, e.g., thrombin glue • Consider change of circuit if evidence of hyperfibrinolysis thought to be mediated by clot in the circuit

98

D.A. Murphy et al. / Transfusion Medicine Reviews 29 (2015) 90–101

Surgery in Patients on ECMO Support Patients receiving ECMO frequently require surgery, for example, cardiac or thoracic surgery, associated with a high risk of bleeding. Many surgeons can be naturally reticent about operating on a group of patients with such a high risk of bleeding [116]. However, with modern tip-to-tip heparin-bonded circuits, it is possible to run ECMO without any anticoagulation for prolonged lengths of time, and excessive bleeding even in the setting of surgery or massive trauma does not have to be a given [117,118]. The risk benefit of continuing anticoagulation in a postsurgical patient needs to be carefully considered, and ideally, anticoagulation should not commence until postsurgical bleeding has resolved.

Fig 5. Peripheral arterial cannula. Depiction of percutaneously inserted femoral arterial cannula with back-perfusion cannula. “No-cut” dilatation technique and no sutures help to maintain a tight skin seal and prevent bleeding at cannula site.

have shown that its effects on transfusion requirements are modest at best (average b 1 unit packed red cells) and that this is counterbalanced by a significant increase in the rate of arterial thrombosis [108,109]. Revision of Canadian National Advisory transfusion guidelines suggest that off-label use of rFVIIa for bleeding not associated with hemophilia remains unproven and should be restricted to clinical trials [110]. Multiple case reports and small case series have reported its use in patients on ECMO with bleeding complications [111,112]. Significant clotting within the ECMO circuit is a risk in this setting. Thus, in light of the paucity of clinical evidence associated with the use of rFVIIa, it cannot be recommended for patients on ECMO based on current data [113–115].

Hemolysis Mechanisms Hemolysis is a common complication of any form of mechanical circulatory support including ECMO. In one meta-analysis of adult and pediatric ECMO complications, it affected 18% of patients [67]. Hemolysis in patients on ECMO is most likely to be due to a complication of the mechanical support but can be due to the underlying condition. Intravascular hemolysis is characterized by an increase in plasma-free hemoglobin (PFHb) and is associated with significant complications including renal failure and multiorgan failure [119,120]. The ELSO registry defines hemolysis complicating ECMO support as PFHb N 0.5 g/L. Hemoglobinemia and hemoglobinuria can be seen if hemolysis is severe. The PFHb is sensitive to phlebotomy technique, and handling both of which can contribute to an artifactually raised measurement. Importantly, if elevated, it is a sign that there is likely to be a circuit or patient problem leading to the hemolysis.

Circuit

Systemic

Whole Circuit

Underlying Disease

• foreign surface adhesion & activation • haemodilution on commencement

• intracardiac clot due to stasis • infection/sepsis • post resuscitation • trauma

Oxygenator • consumption of platelets & plasma proteins

Drugs

O2

• heparin bleeding / HIT • antiplatelet agents

Liver

positive pressure

• synthetic function -procoagulant and natural anticoagulants • fibrinolytic pathway

Pump • altered shear - VWF dysfunction - platelet activation - reduced ADAMTS13

negative pressure • haemolysis reduced NO • cavitation

Low Flow Zones and Connectors (e.g. cannula to circuit connectors, back perfusion cannula )

Systemic Inflammatory Response • microparticle release • leucocyte activation and NETs • DIC • platelet/endothelial activation

• turbulence & increased shear • platelet activation Fig 6. Potential effects of ECMO on coagulation activation. Consequences of ECMO on the coagulation system can occur at the level of the circuit (mechanical factors) and systemically (patient specific). Examples are shown, but it is likely that these effects overlap at the multiple sites identified. Depending on which factors dominate, this may result in bleeding or thrombosis. NO, nitric oxide; NETs, neutrophil extracellular traps.

D.A. Murphy et al. / Transfusion Medicine Reviews 29 (2015) 90–101

Patient and Circuit-Related Factors Causing Hemolysis. Hemolysis in mechanical circulatory support can be due to a number of factors. Red cell damage is thought to be due to an increase in shear stress [121]. The pressure drop across the membrane oxygenator is also directly associated with hemolysis [122]. Most centers use centrifugal pumps for ECMO support. Hemolysis is less likely with centrifugal pumps than the older-style roller pumps [123]. Centrifugal pumps can be associated with generation of high negative pressures if the blood flow is obstructed or decreased. This will be manifest as kicking or chattering in the lines and falling pump outputs. The negative pressures generated at the pump head can intermittently be as large as −700 mmHg. This negative pressure can cause a suction effect, with cavitation of blood causing blood trauma and hemolysis [124,125]. This problem can be erroneously addressed by increasing the pump speed (revolutions per minute) in a misguided attempt to increase pump flow. The correct approach is to decrease the revolutions per minute while dealing with the issue leading to the access insufficiency. High pump speed is also related to the development of hemolysis [125]. Plasma-free hemoglobin is a sensitive test for the development of technical-related hemolysis in the setting of ECMO support and should be monitored at least twice per day. Other markers of hemolysis may also be present (increased Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), unconjugated bilirubin, reduced haptoglobin) but are less sensitive. Summary and Future Directions Patients requiring ECMO represent a heterogeneous group of critically ill patients with many different underling conditions unified only by their requirement for this level of cardiorespiratory support. There is a variety of potential circuit and patient factors that contribute to disturbances in coagulation (Fig 6). They provide many challenges in managing and preventing bleeding and clotting complications. In order for ECMO to become more established, we require ongoing quality research to describe the impact of ECMO support on clotting and hemostasis. Only then can we hope to develop robust guidelines for treatment of bleeding, management of anticoagulation, and optimal monitoring strategies in order to improve survival. References [1] Hill JD, O'Brien TG, Murray JJ, Dontigny L, Bramson ML, Osborn JJ, et al. Prolonged extracorporeal oxygenation for acute post-traumatic respiratory failure (shocklung syndrome). N Engl J Med 1972;286:629–34. [2] Bartlett RH, Roloff DW, Cornell RG, Andrews AF, Dillon PW, Zwischenberger JB. Extracorporeal circulation in neonatal respiratory failure: a prospective randomized study. Pediatrics 1985;76:479–87. [3] O'Rourke PP, Crone RK, Vacanti JP, Ware JH, Lillehei CW, Parad RB, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and conventional medical therapy in neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: a prospective randomized study. Pediatrics 1989;84:957–63. [4] UK Collaborative ECMO Trial Group. UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Lancet 1996;348:75–82. [5] Hubmayr RD, Farmer JC. Should we “rescue” patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) and lung injury from conventional mechanical ventilation? Chest 2010;137:745–7. [6] Noah MA, Peek GJ, Finney SJ, Griffiths MJ, Harrison DA, Grieve R, et al. Referral to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center and mortality among patients with severe 2009 influenza A (H1N1). JAMA 2011;306:1659–68. [7] Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, Wilson A, Allen E, Thalanany MM, et al. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:1351–63. [8] Pham T, Combes A, Rozé H, Chevret S, Mercat A, Roch A, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pandemic influenza A (H1N1)–induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: a cohort study and propensity-matched analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187:276–85. [9] Strueber M. Extracorporeal support as a bridge to lung transplantation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010;16:69–73. [10] Peek GJ, Killer HM, Reeves R, Sosnowski AW, Firmin RK. Early experience with a polymethyl pentene oxygenator for adult extracorporeal life support. ASAIO J 2002;48:480–2. [11] Davies A, Jones D, Bailey M, Beca J, Bellomo R, Blackwell N, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A (H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA 2009;302:1888–95.

99

[12] Patroniti N, Zangrillo A, Pappalardo F, Peris A, Cianchi G, Braschi A, et al. The Italian ECMO network experience during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic: preparation for severe respiratory emergency outbreaks. Intensive Care Med 2011;37: 1447–57. [13] Chen Y-S, Lin J-W, Yu H-Y, Ko W-J, Jerng J-S, Chang W-T, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life-support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis. Lancet 2008;372:554–61. [14] Chen YS, Chao A, Yu HY, Ko WJ. Analysis and results of prolonged resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients rescued by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:197–203. [15] Shin TG, Choi J-H, Jo IJ, Sim MS, Song HG, Jeong YK, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with inhospital cardiac arrest: a comparison with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med 2011; 39:1–7. [16] Aubron C, Cheng AC, Pilcher D, Leong T, Magrin G, Cooper DJ, et al. Factors associated with outcomes of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: a 5-year cohort study. Crit Care 2013;17:R73. [17] Brodie D, Bacchetta M. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for ARDS in adults. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1905–14. [18] Rastan AJ, Lachmann N, Walther T, Doll N, Gradistanac T, Gommert JF, et al. Autopsy findings in patients on postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Int J Artif Organs 2006;29:1121–31. [19] Oliver WC. Anticoagulation and coagulation management for ECMO. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009;13:154–75. [20] Garcia JP, Iacono A, Kon ZN, Griffith BP. Ambulatory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a new approach for bridge-to-lung transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:e137–9. [21] Mangi AA, Mason DP, Yun JJ, Murthy SC, Pettersson GB. Bridge to lung transplantation using short-term ambulatory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:713–5. [22] Olsson KM, Simon A, Strueber M, Hadem J, Wiesner O, Gottlieb J, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in nonintubated patients as bridge to lung transplantation. Am J Transplant 2010;10:2173–8. [23] MacLaren G, Combes A, Bartlett RH. Contemporary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for adult respiratory failure: life support in the new era. Intensive Care Med 2011;38:210–20. [24] Khoshbin E, Roberts N, Harvey C, Machin D, Killer H, Peek GJ, et al. Poly-methyl pentene oxygenators have improved gas exchange capability and reduced transfusion requirements in adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J 2005; 51:281–7. [25] Müller T, Philipp A, Luchner A, Karagiannidis C, Bein T, Hilker M, et al. A new miniaturized system for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult respiratory failure. Crit Care 2009;13:R205. [26] Lehle K, Philipp A, Gleich O, Holzamer A, Müller T, Bein T, et al. Efficiency in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation—cellular deposits on polymethypentene membranes increase resistance to blood flow and reduce gas exchange capacity. ASAIO J 2008;54:612–7. [27] Horton S, Thuys C, Bennett M, Augustin S. Experience with the Jostra Rotaflow and QuadroxD oxygenator for ECMO. Perfusion 2004;19:17–23. [28] Reul HM, Akdis M. Blood pumps for circulatory support. Perfusion 2000;15: 295–311. [29] Muntean W. Coagulation and anticoagulation in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Artif Organs 1999;23:979–83. [30] Annich G, Lynch WR, MacLaren G, Wilson JM, Bartlett RH, editors. Chapter 5. ECMO—extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support in critical care, Ann Arbor; 2012. p. 75–86. [31] Lubnow M, Philipp A, Dornia C, Schroll S, Bein T, Creutzenberg M, et al. D-Dimers as an early marker for oxygenator exchange in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Crit Care 2014;29:473.e1-5. [32] Cuker A. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: an integrated approach. Semin Thromb Hemost 2014;40:106–14. [33] Lee GM, Arepally GM. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2013;2013:668–74. [34] Warkentin TE. HIT paradigms and paradoxes. J Thromb Haemost 2011;9(Suppl 1): 105–17. [35] Crowther M, Cook D, Guyatt G, Zytaruk N, McDonald E, Williamson D, et al. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the critically ill: interpreting the 4Ts test in a randomized trial. J Crit Care 2014;29:470.e7-15. [36] Gu YJ, van Oeveren W, Akkerman C, Boonstra PW, Huyzen RJ, Wildevuur CR. Heparin-coated circuits reduce the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:917–22. [37] Feyrer R, Harig F, Cesnjevar R. Bioline or safeline treatment of CPB circuits? Cardiovasc Eng 2003;8(1/2):79–84. [38] Sakiyama-Elbert SE. Incorporation of heparin into biomaterials. Acta Biomater 2014;10(4):1581–7. [39] Pappalardo F, Maj G, Scandroglio A, Sampietro F, Zangrillo A, Koster A. Bioline heparin-coated ECMO with bivalirudin anticoagulation in a patient with acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: the immune reaction appeared to continue unabated. Perfusion 2009;24:135–7. [40] Beiderlinden M, Treschan T, Görlinger K, Peters J. Argatroban in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Artif Organs 2007;31:461–5. [41] Mejak B, Giacomuzzi C, Heller E, You X, Ungerleider R, Shen I, et al. Argatroban usage for anticoagulation for ECMO on a post-cardiac patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. J Extra Corpor Technol 2004;36: 178–81.

100

D.A. Murphy et al. / Transfusion Medicine Reviews 29 (2015) 90–101

[42] Young G, Yonekawa KE, Nakagawa P, Nugent DJ. Argatroban as an alternative to heparin in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits. Perfusion 2004;19: 283–8. [43] Koster A, Weng Y, Böttcher W, Gromann T, Kuppe H, Hetzer R. Successful use of bivalirudin as anticoagulant for ECMO in a patient with acute HIT. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1865–7. [44] Cegarra-Sanmartín V, González-Rodríguez R, Paniagua-Iglesias P, Santamaría-Ortiz A, Cueva LF, Galán-Serrano J, et al. Fondaparinux as a safe alternative for managing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2014;28:1020–4. [45] Bauer C, Vichova Z, Ffrench P, Hercule C, Jegaden O, Bastien O, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with danaparoid sodium after massive pulmonary embolism. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1101–3. [46] Dager WE, Gosselin RC, Yoshikawa R, Owings JT. Lepirudin in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and extracorporeal membranous oxygenation. Ann Pharmacother 2004;38:598–601. [47] Balasubramanian SK, Tiruvoipati R, Chatterjee S, Sosnowski A, Firmin RK. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with lepirudin anticoagulation for Wegener's granulomatosis with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. ASAIO J 2005;51:477–9. [48] Kelton JG, Arnold DM, Bates SM. Nonheparin anticoagulants for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med 2013;368:737–44. [49] Dyke CM, Smedira NG, Koster A, Aronson S, McCarthy II HL, Kirshner R, et al. A comparison of bivalirudin to heparin with protamine reversal in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: the EVOLUTION-ON study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:533–9. [50] Linkins L-A, Dans AL, Moores LK, Bona R, Davidson BL, Schulman S, et al. Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012;141:e495S–530S. [51] Bembea MM, Schwartz JM, Shah N, Colantuoni E, Lehmann CU, Kickler T, et al. Anticoagulation monitoring during pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J 2013;59:63–8. [52] MacLaren G, Combes A, Bartlett R. Contemporary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for adult respiratory failure: life support in the new era. Intensive Care Med 2012;38:210–20. [53] Despotis GJ, Avidan MS, Hogue CW. Mechanisms and attenuation of hemostatic activation during extracorporeal circulation. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:S1821–31. [54] Esper SA, Levy JH, Waters JH, Welsby IJ. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the adult: a review of anticoagulation monitoring and transfusion. Anesth Analg 2014;118:731–43. [55] ELSO Registry, editor. ELSO anticoagulation guidelines; 2014. p. 1–17. [56] Sohn N, Marcoux J, Mycyk T, Krahn J, Meng Q. The impact of different biocompatible coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits on inflammatory response and oxidative stress. Perfusion 2009;24:231–7. [57] de Vroege R, Huybregts R, van Oeveren W, van Klarenbosch J, Linley G, Mutlu J, et al. The impact of heparin-coated circuits on hemodynamics during and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Artif Organs 2005;29:490–7. [58] de Vroege R, van Oeveren W, van Klarenbosch J, Stooker W, Huybregts MAJM, Hack CE, et al. The impact of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits on pulmonary function and the release of inflammatory mediators. Anesth Analg 2004: 1586–94. [59] Olson ST, Björk I. Regulation of thrombin activity by antithrombin and heparin. Semin Thromb Hemost 1994;20:373–409. [60] Arnold P, Jackson S, Wallis J, Smith J, Bolton D, Haynes S. Coagulation factor activity during neonatal extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med 2001;27:1395–400. [61] Niebler RA, Christensen M, Berens R, Wellner H, Mikhailov T, Tweddell JS. Antithrombin replacement during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Artif Organs 2011;35:1024–8. [62] Agati S, Ciccarello G, Salvo D, Turla G, Undar A, Mignosa C. Use of a novel anticoagulation strategy during ECMO in a pediatric population: single-center experience. ASAIO J 2006;52:513–6. [63] Wong TE, Huang Y-S, Weiser J, Brogan TV, Shah SS, Witmer CM. Antithrombin concentrate use in children: a multicenter cohort study. J Pediatr 2013;163:1329–34. [64] Bembea MM, Annich G, Rycus P, Oldenburg G, Berkowitz I, Pronovost P. Variability in anticoagulation management of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2013;14:e77–84. [65] Whiting D, DiNardo JA. TEG and ROTEM: technology and clinical applications. Am J Hematol 2014;89:228–32. [66] Paden ML, Conrad SA, Rycus PT, Thiagarajan RR, Registry ELSO. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Report 2012. ASAIO J 2013;59:202–10. [67] Zangrillo A, Landoni G, Biondi-Zoccai G, Greco M, Greco T, Frati G, et al. A metaanalysis of complications and mortality of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Resusc 2013;15:172–8. [68] Kumar TKS, Zurakowski D, Dalton H, Talwar S, Allard-Picou A, Duebener LF, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in postcardiotomy patients: factors influencing outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:330–2. [69] Rastan AJ, Dege A, Mohr M, Doll N, Falk V, Walther T, et al. Early and late outcomes of 517 consecutive adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:302–11. [70] Golding LA, Crouch RD, Stewart RW, Novoa R, Lytle BW, McCarthy PM, et al. Postcardiotomy centrifugal mechanical ventricular support. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:1059–63. [71] Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A (H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA 2009;302:1888–95.

[72] Vanderschueren S, De Weerdt A, Malbrain M, Vankersschaever D, Frans E, Wilmer A, et al. Thrombocytopenia and prognosis in intensive care. Crit Care Med 2000;28: 1871–6. [73] Crowther MA, Cook DJ, Meade MO, Griffith LE, Guyatt GH, Arnold DM, et al. Thrombocytopenia in medical-surgical critically ill patients: prevalence, incidence, and risk factors. J Crit Care 2005;20:348–53. [74] Williamson DR, Albert M, Heels-Ansdell D, Arnold DM, Lauzier F, Zarychanski R, et al. Thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients receiving thromboprophylaxis: frequency, risk factors, and outcomes. Chest 2013;144:1207–15. [75] Lieberman L, Bercovitz RS, Sholapur NS, Heddle NM, Stanworth SJ, Arnold DM. Platelet transfusions for critically ill patients with thrombocytopenia. Blood 2014; 123:1146–51. [76] Greinacher A, Selleng K. Thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit patient. ASH Education Program Book; 2010 135–43. [77] Despotis G, Eby C, Lublin DM. A review of transfusion risks and optimal management of perioperative bleeding with cardiac surgery. Transfusion 2008;48:2S–30S. [78] Levi M, Cate Ten H. Disseminated intravascular coagulation. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:586–92. [79] Levi M, Meijers JC. DIC: which laboratory tests are most useful. Blood Rev 2011;25: 33–7. [80] Bernard GR, Vincent J-L, Laterre P-F, LaRosa SP, Dhainaut J-F, Lopez-Rodriguez A, et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein c for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2001;344:699–709. [81] Gando S, Nanzaki S, Sasaki S, Kemmotsu O. Significant correlations between tissue factor and thrombin markers in trauma and septic patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb Haemost 1998;79:1111–5. [82] Taylor FB, Toh CH, Hoots WK, Wada H. Towards definition, clinical and laboratory criteria, and a scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb Haemost 2001;86:1327–30. [83] Hunt BJ. Bleeding and coagulopathies in critical care. N Engl J Med 2014;370: 847–59. [84] Hunt BJ, Parratt MS, Segal HC, Sheikh S, Kallis P, Yacoub M. Activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis during cardiothoracic operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65: 712–8. [85] Wood AJJ, Mannucci PM. Hemostatic drugs. N Engl J Med 1998;339:245–53. [86] Downard CD, Betit P, Chang RW, Garza JJ, Arnold JH, Wilson JM. Impact of Amicar on hemorrhagic complications of ECMO: a ten-year review. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38:1212–6. [87] Wilson JM, Bower LK, Fackler JC, Beals DA, Bergus BO, Kevy SV. Aminocaproic acid decreases the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage and other hemorrhagic complications of ECMO. J Pediatr Surg 1993;28:536–41. [88] Horwitz JR, Cofer BR, Warner BW, Cheu HW, Lally KP. A multicenter trial of 6aminocaproic acid (Amicar) in the prevention of bleeding in infants on ECMO. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:1610–3. [89] Heyde EC. Gastrointestinal bleeding in aortic stenosis (letter). N Engl J Med 1958; 259:196. [90] Warkentin TE, Moore JC, Morgan DG. Aortic stenosis and bleeding gastrointestinal angiodysplasia: is acquired von Willebrand's disease the link? Lancet 1992;340: 35–7. [91] Vincentelli A, Susen S, Le Tourneau T, Six I, Fabre O, Juthier F, et al. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2003;349:343–9. [92] Crow S, John R, Boyle A, Shumway S, Liao K, Colvin-Adams M, et al. Gastrointestinal bleeding rates in recipients of nonpulsatile and pulsatile left ventricular assist devices. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:208–15. [93] Miller LW. The development of the von Willebrand syndrome with the use of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: a cause-and-effect relationship. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1214–5. [94] Uriel N, Pak SW, Jorde UP, Jude B, Susen S, Vincentelli A, et al. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome after continuous-flow mechanical device support contributes to a high prevalence of bleeding during long-term support and at the time of transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1207–13. [95] Meyer AL, Malehsa D, Bara C, Budde U, Slaughter MS, Haverich A, et al. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with an axial flow left ventricular assist device. Circ Heart Fail 2010;3:675–81. [96] Dittmer R, Abd Müller HE, Schaeper H, Schneppenheim S. Spectrum of the acquired von Willebrand syndrome in a large cohort of patients diagnosed in a single institution. Blood 2013;122:3607-7. [97] Nguyen T, Hui SK, Soundar EP, Nguyen KT, Teruya M, Cruz MA, et al. Abstract 452: loss of large von Willebrand factor multimers during pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2014;15(4 Suppl.):S103–4. [98] Pasala S, Fiser RT, Stine KC, Swearingen CJ, Prodhan P. von Willebrand factor multimers in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. ASAIO J 2014;60:419–23. [99] Heilmann C, Zieger B, Benk C, Trummer G, Nakamura L, Schlensak C, et al. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with extra-corporeal life support (ECLS) or membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;59(1 Suppl.):V136. [100] Bilen O, Loftis L, Teruya J. Severe thrombotic and bleeding complications in a baby with heterozygous factor V Leiden and acquired von Willebrand disease on ECMO. J Extra Corpor Technol 2011;43:64–9. [101] Heilmann C, Geisen U, Beyersdorf F, Nakamura L, Benk C, Trummer G, et al. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Intensive Care Med 2011;38:62–8. [102] Al-Tamimi M, Tan CW, Qiao J, Pennings GJ, Javadzadegan A, Yong ASC, et al. Pathologic shear triggers shedding of vascular receptors: a novel mechanism for downregulation of platelet glycoprotein VI in stenosed coronary vessels. Blood 2012; 119:4311–20.

D.A. Murphy et al. / Transfusion Medicine Reviews 29 (2015) 90–101 [103] Gardiner EE, Andrews RK. Plasma sGPVI: changing levels in human disease. Thromb Res 2014;133:306–7. [104] Federici AB, Budde U, Castaman G, Rand JH, Tiede A. Current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to patients with acquired von Willebrand syndrome: a 2013 update. Semin Thromb Hemost 2013;39:191–201. [105] Federici AB, Budde U, Rand JH. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome 2004: international registry. Hamostaseologie 2004;24:50–5. [106] Tiede A, Rand JH, Budde U, Ganser A, Federici AB. How I treat the acquired von Willebrand syndrome. Blood 2011;117:6777–85. [107] National Blood Authority, Australia, editor. Critical bleeding massive transfusion; 2011. p. 1–113 [Available from: http://www.blood.gov.au/pbm-module-1. Accessed 19/10/2014]. [108] Simpson E, Lin Y, Stanworth S, Birchall J, Doree C, Hyde C. Recombinant factor VIIa for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;3:CD005011. [109] Lin Y, Stanworth S, Birchall J, Doree C, Hyde C. Use of recombinant factor VIIa for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without hemophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2011;183:E9-19. [110] Lin Y, Moltzan CJ, Anderson DR. National Advisory Committee on Blood and Blood Products. The evidence for the use of recombinant factor VIIa in massive bleeding: revision of the transfusion policy framework. Transfus Med 2012;22:383–94. [111] Repessé X, Au SM, Bréchot N, Trouillet J-L, Leprince P, Chastre J, et al. Recombinant factor VIIa for uncontrollable bleeding in patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: report on 15 cases and literature review. Crit Care 2013;17:R55. [112] Niebler RA, Punzalan RC, Marchan M, Lankiewicz MW. Activated recombinant factor VII for refractory bleeding during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2010;11:98–102. [113] Syburra T, Lachat M, Genoni M, Wilhelm MJ. Fatal outcome of recombinant factor VIIa in heart transplantation with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:1643–5. [114] Bui JD, Despotis GD, Trulock EP, Patterson GA, Goodnough LT. Fatal thrombosis after administration of activated prothrombin complex concentrates in a patient

[115]

[116]

[117]

[118]

[119]

[120]

[121] [122]

[123] [124] [125]

101

supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation who had received activated recombinant factor VII. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:852–4. Chalwin RP, Tiruvoipati R, Peek GJ. Fatal thrombosis with activated factor VII in a paediatric patient on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;34:685–6. Marasco SF, Preovolos A, Lim K, Salamonsen RF. Thoracotomy in adults while on ECMO is associated with uncontrollable bleeding. Perfusion 2007;22: 23–6. Joshi V, Harvey C, Nakas A, Waller DA, Peek GJ, Firmin R. The need for thoracic surgery in adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a 16-year experience. Perfusion 2013;28:328–32. Arlt M, Philipp A, Voelkel S, Rupprecht L, Mueller T, Hilker M, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe trauma patients with bleeding shock. Resuscitation 2010;81:804–9. Betrus C, Remenapp R, Charpie J, Kudelka T, Brophy P, Smoyer WE, et al. Enhanced hemolysis in pediatric patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;13: 378–83. Schaer DJ, Buehler PW, Alayash AI, Belcher JD, Vercellotti GM. Hemolysis and free hemoglobin revisited: exploring hemoglobin and hemin scavengers as a novel class of therapeutic proteins. Blood 2013;121:1276–84. Leverett LB, Hellums JD, Alfrey CP, Lynch EC. Red blood cell damage by shear stress. Biophys J 1972;12:257–73. Kawahito S, Maeda T, Motomura T, Ishitoya H, Takano T, Nonaka K, et al. Hemolytic characteristics of oxygenators during clinical extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J 2002;48:636–9. Horton AM, Butt W. Pump-induced haemolysis: is the constrained vortex pump better or worse than the roller pump? Perfusion 1992;7:103–8. Lehle K, Philipp A, Müller T, Schettler F, Bein T, Schmid C, et al. Flow dynamics of different adult ECMO systems: a clinical evaluation. Artif Organs 2014;38:391–8. Toomasian JM, Bartlett RH. Hemolysis and ECMO pumps in the 21st century. Perfusion 2011;26:5–6.