Vol. 185, No. 3, 1992 June 30, 1992
ESTROGEN
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RECEPTOR-INDUCED
VITELLOGENIN
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Pages 944-952
BENDING
A2 GENE HORMONE
OF THE
RESPONSE
XENOPUS
ELEMENT
Michele Sabbah, Sophie Le Ricousse, Gerard Redeuilh, and Etienne-Emile INSERM
Received
U33, Lab. Hormones,
May 4,
Baulieu
94276 Le Kremlin-BicCtre
Cedex, France
1992
SUMMARY: DNA bending is increasingly proposed as an essential step for the establishment of the multiprotein complexes required for transcription initiation. Polyamines and metallic cations, known to promote DNA-bending, enhance the binding of purified estrogen receptor (ER) to the estrogen response element (ERE) of the Xenopus vitellogenin A2 gene. Using both circular permutation electrophoretic mobility and cyclization assays, we provide evidence that ER bends the DNA at the estrogen response element. The same bending occurs as a result of estrogen receptor protein binding independently of its conformational changes induced by hormone or anti-hormone. We suggest a role of the observed DNA bending in estrogen-regulated transcription. o 1992~~~~~~~~ prBss,Inc.
The estrogen binds to cis-acting
receptor (ER) is a ligand regulated transcription factor that DNA elements, termed estrogen response elements (EREs),
present in the promoter of target genes (1). The intimate mechanism by which the receptor modulates the rate of transcription is unknown. It probably involves receptor
interaction
chromatin
with
structure.
independently
In vitro,
differently
difference
factors
the estrogen
and/or
mobility
changes
in DNA
agonist or antagonist
shift assays show that the ER-DNA
mobilities
change of the complex (2). To understand better the structure
suggests a ligand-induced and conformation
(2,3).
complexes
when the receptor binds to an agonist or an antagonist.
in electrophoretic
or
receptor binds to EREs as a dimer
of the absence or presence of hormone,
Data from electrophoretic migrate
transcription
This
conformational
of ER-ERE complexes,
we have tested the influence of polyamines and several metallic cations, known to alter the DNA structure, on the binding of ER to an oligonucleotide containing the palindromic ERE sequence of the Xenopus vitellogenin A2 gene (AB-ERE). We have investigated whether binding of ER in either the absence or presence of hormone
or antagonist
permutation
gel shift
receptor, liganded 0006-291X/92 Copyright All rights
alters
the DNA
assay to demonstrate
structure. that
We have used a circular the binding
of the estrogen
or not, induces a bend at the ERE of the vitellogeain
$4.00 0 1992 by Academic Press, of reproduction in any form
Inc. reserved.
944
A2 gene.
Vol.
185,
No.
3,
1992
MATERIALS
AND
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
METHODS
Plasmids and probes preparation: The oligonucleotide AB-ERE used in the band shift experiments was: 5’-TCGAGCTCAAAGTCAGGTCACAGTGACCTGATCAAAGTI’G-3’. It contains the palindromic hormone response element of the Xenopus vitellogenin A2 gene. It was labeled by end filling with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I (Boehringer). Plasmid pERE-Bend resulted from the insertion of this 40 bp oligonucleotide at the Sal1 site of the pBend2 vector that contains olylinker direct repeats on each side of the Sal1 site (4). The DNA probes, use B in the circular permutation experiments, were prepared by cutting, with the appropriate restriction enzymes, either the plasmid or a fragment encompassing the direct repeats. This fragment was obtained by polymerase chain reaction amplification, using primers complementary to flanking sequences, and purified by electxophoresis on polyacrylamide gel. The phosphatase-treated probes were labeled with [y32P]-ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase (Boehringer) using standard procedures. The probe used in the cyclization assay was excised from plasmid pBLcat2 ERE (5) by cleavage with PvuII. It was ligated to a dodecameric NcoI linker (Boehringer), cleaved with NcoI to generate cohesive ends, purified on gel, and labeled with [y32Pl-ATP, as above, after phosphatase treatment. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays: Assays were performed as previously described (2). Binding reactions were carried out. in 20 pl binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 1 mM DTI’, 5% glycerol, 0.2 pg BSA and 1 pg poly (dI-dC)). In some experiments (see the results section), the binding buffer contained polyamines or metallic cations. The ER was purified as previously described (6). Cyclization assays: Labeled DNA (50 PM) was incubated with ER (150 PM) in 200 pl ligation buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 100 mM KCl, 0.5 mM D’IT, 5 mM MgC12, 1 mM ATP). Ligation was started by addition of the T4 DNA li ase (10 U/ml) (Boehringer). Aliquots (25 pl) were withdrawn at the indicate % times and the reaction quenched adjusting the concentration to 50 mM EDTA and treatment at 65°C for 10 min. Separation of ligation products was performed by electrophoresis in 4% polyacrylamide gel. The fraction of linear DNA was determined at each time by densitometric scanning of the autoradiograms or by direct gel scanning using a multitrace-master model LB-85 (Berthold Analytical Instruments).
RESULTS Polyamines
and metallic
We investigated
the influence
known to alter strongly its DNA
target
cations
. Figure
enhance
the binding
of polyamines
the DNA structure
of ER to DNA
and several metallic
(7,8), on the in vitro binding
1 presents the results from an electrophoretic
cations, of ER to mobility
shift experiment, in which the oligonucleotide probe AB-ERE was incubated with ER in the presence of various concentrations of spermine, spermidine, or of several metallic cations also known to strongly stabilize or promote DNA bending. In this experiment, a concentration of ER was used, such that only a slight ER-AZERE complexes were detectable (Fig. 1, lane 1). A dramatic increase in the amount of ER-AO-ERE complexes was observed in the presence of polyamines. Maximal complexes
formation
was reached in the presence of 0.5 mM spermine 945
or 1 mM
Vol.
185,
No.
3.
BIOCHEMICAL
1992
Spermine '01
05
2
3
1
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
Spermidine 3"Ol
1
3"l
7
8
9
5
COMMUNICATIONS
ZnClp
CaCl2
M&b
05
RESEARCH
lo"1
5
IO"50
12 13
14 15
100 200'
FEZ? DNA-
1
4
5
6
10
11
16
17 18
Fi re 1. Effects of polyamines and metallic cations on the DNA binding of ER. T*P]-labeled ERF probe (0 4 ng) was incubated with the indicated concentrations of spermine, spermidine or chloride salts of M 2 + , Ca2 + (all in mM) and Zn2+ (in pM) prior to addition of ER (10 fmo k es). Protein-DNA complexes were separated from protein-free DNA by native electrophoresis in 6% polyacrylamide gel, and visualized by autoradiography. The control (lane 1) was run on the same gel.
spermidine. Addition of Caz+ or Mg2+ also induced a significant increase in the amounts of ER-DNA complexes. The maximal effect was seen for 5-10 mM of Mg2+ and 1 mM of Caz + . In contrast, in the presence of Z&+ , a cation very potent to induce DNA bending, binding of ER to AB-ERE was undetectable. This result can be related to previous observations showing that an excess of transition metals might interfere with the tetrahedral coordination of zinc, altering the conformation of the zinc finger domain of the ER, and thus inhibiting its DNA binding activity (9). These results clearly show that polyamines or divalent metallic cations strongly increase the affinity of ER for its cognate DNA, probably as a result of an alteration of the DNA motif configuration. Although polyamines were reported to stabilize the estrogen receptor protein, they were also reported to increase the affinity of the ER towards synthetic non-specific DNA containing alternating purine-pyrimidine sequences by promoting the conversion of the polynucleotide to the left-handed Z-DNA form (10,111. To test if the alteration of the DNA structure motif results from a A-to-Z DNA conformation transition, we have performed experiments in the presence of distamycin. This drug has an intrinsic twist that favors its insertion into the minor groove of the DNA (12). It fails to bind left-handed Z-DNA; in fact, binding of distamycin and related molecules to DNA favors A-to-B and Z-to-B helix transitions. Distamycin incubated with DNA at concentrations between 2 pM to 2 946
Vol.
185, No. 3, 1992
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
1234 Figure 2. Effect of distamycin on the DNA-binding of ER. The [y32P]-labeled ERE probe was incubated with increasing concentration of distamycin (lane 2: 2 pM, 3: 2 nM, 4: 2pM) prior to addition of ER (70 fmoles). Protein-DNA complexes were separated as in Fig. 1. The control (lane 1) was run on the same gel.
pM prior
to addition
of ER did not interfer
with
the formation
of ER-DNA
complexes. Figure 2 shows results obtained in the presence of Mg2+, which demonstrate that distamycin neither changed the amount nor the electrophoretic
of the complexes. Similar results were obtained in the absence of polyamines or metallic cations and in the presence of polyamines (data not shown.) Three conclusions can be drawn from these results: 1) Effect of polyamines mobility
results from their capacity to induce DNA bending and not from the conversion
of
the polynucleotide to the left-handed Z-DNA conformation; 2) Contacts of ER with the DNA minor groove are not required for its high affinity binding to ERR. This agrees with data recently reported on NMR studies of peptide containing the DNA-binding domain of ER and X-ray crystal analysis of GR-DNA binding domain complex (13,14); and 3) Binding of ER to linear DNA is energetically less favorable than binding to bent DNA. ER induces
bending
at the A2 ERE motif
To test if the binding of purified ER to ERB induces a bend, we have used a circular permutation electrophoretic mobility shift assay. It has been demonstrated that, in gel electrophoresis, bent DNA fragments migrate slower than a linear DNA fragment of same size and base composition. This behavior is also observed for protein-induced DNA bending (15). We have utilized set of DNA probes, of same length (157 bp) and base composition, containing a single AS-ERR located at different
positions
within
the DNA fragment 947
(Fig. 3A). Results
of the
Vol.
185, No. 3, 1992
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
A A
B
C
DEF
G
H
A
C
B
DEF
G
H
-
A
-
B C DEFP G
ABCDEFGH
Fimre probes
“/\
Ab
3. (A) Structure were generated
of DNA probes used for circular permutation analysis. The cleavage at sites within two by restriction endonuclease
direct repeated sequences flanking the ER bindin site (dark box). Restriction endonucleases used are: Mlu I (A), Nhe I (B), Xho I (8 ).,Eco RV (D), Sma I (E), Nru I (F), Kpn I (G) and Bam HI (H). (B) Electrophoresls mobility shift assay. The [yJ2P]-labeled
DNA
fragments
were
incubated
with
the ER and subjected
to
electrophoresis on 6% poly acrylamide gel. Monoclonal antibody H222 anti-ER (1 pg) included in the binding reaction mixture containing the Xho probe was used as control of protein specificity (lane Ab) (C). The mobility of the ER-DNA complexes is plotted against the position of the center of the ERE binding site within the 157 bp fragments. The bend center is located around position 82 bp as determined by an extrapolation of the flanks of the curve (15,17).
electrophoretic fragments
mobility
displayed
shift
assay are shown
the same electrophoretic
in Fig. 3B. All mobility
naked
regardless
what
DNA the
position of the AB-ERE binding site was. This indicates the absence of intrinsic curvature in the DNA fragments. In contrast, migration of ER-DNA complexes was clearly dependent
on the location of the ER-binding
site within
the fragment.
The fastest migration of the complex occured when the binding site approached one of the ends of the DNA fragment. When the binding site was more central, the complexes migrated slower. This variation in electrophoretic mobilities, upon the position of the ER binding site within the DNA fragment, suggests that ER binding
induces a DNA bend. 948
Vol.
185,
No.
3,
BIOCHEMICAL
1992
There is substantial
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
the effect of hormone-free
receptor
antagonist ICI 164,384 on the ER-induced dependence of the electrophoretic mobility, the DNA fragment,
between
DNA
caused by protein-induced
investigated
the
electrophoretic reduced
or receptor
shift
bending
complexed
and an increased
or untwisting
dependence
with
difference
only
flexibility
of the DNA,
on the
assay. Running
did not affect significantly
the
circular
by 3% (data
permutation
not shown).
the electrophoretic
mobilities
of receptor-DNA
complexes
of the we have
the gel at 25°C instead mobility
conclude that the position-dependent differences in electrophoretic ER-DNA complexes are consistent with DNA bending. Relative
to
We have
DNA bending. In all cases a similar upon the position of the ERE within
melting
temperature
mobility
the mobility
temperature
agonist, or antagonist.
was observed (data not shown).
To distinguish DNA
COMMUNICATIONS
evidence that, in vitro, the receptor binds specifically
the ERE in the presence or absence of hormone, examined
RESEARCH
of 4°C
Since
the
pattern,
we
mobilities
were plotted
versus
of the
position of the center of the ERE within the 157 bp fragment (Fig.30 The bending angle (a) was calculated using the empirical equation pM/pE = co&2 (16) where pM is the relative mobility of the complex with ER bound at the center of the DNA fragment and pE is the relative mobility of the complex with ER bound at the end of the DNA fragment. According to this equation the calculated bending angle is 50+8” and the bending occurred, within the experimental error (5 bp), near the center of the ERE. An alternate method to study protein-induced DNA bending has been developed (18). If a protein induces a bend in a linear DNA fragment, it will decrease the distance between cohesive ends and hence increase the probability ring closure. This can be monitored
under defined conditions
in which the rate of
intramolecular
ligation
the equilibrium
fraction of DNA molecules with cohesive ends. We determined
rate
of cyclization
pBLcat2ERE
of a DNA fragment
of the 484 bp PvuII
of
by T4 DNA ligase is proportional fragment
derived
from
to the
plasmid
(5), in the absence or presence of various amounts of ER. This linear
DNA fragment contained an ERE binding site close to its center and cohesive ends were generated by addition of a linker (see methods). The products of cyclization were resolved by electrophoresis
on 4% polyacrylamide
gels. Results are presented
in Fig. 4. The ratio L+jLo (Lt = linear DNA remaining at time t and La = linear DNA at time 0) is plotted as a function of time. A 3-fold molar excess of ER over binding sites increased the rate of cyclization approximately 1.5 fold. Higher concentrations of receptor did not raise further the rate of cyclization but interfered
with cyclization,
presumably
through
non-specific
ER binding
to DNA
termini. Thus only a narrow range of ER concentrations can be used to measure the rate of cyclization. Temperature, between 10 and 25°C did not significantly affect the magnitude of circularization rate enhancement, resulting from ERinduced DNA bending, and revealed the absence of ER-induced DNA untwisting. 949
Vol.
185, No. 3, 1992
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
Time
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
(min)
Figure 4. Li ase-mediated DNA cyclization assay. Kinetics of circularization of the 484 bp f ragment (50 pM) were performed at 25°C in the absence (0) or presence (0) of 150 pM of ER.
DISCUSSION
This study provides evidence that binding of ER alters the structure of its target DNA. The alteration is most likely to be a bend or a kink of the target DNA located within the ER.E rather than a local DNA-flexibility due to melting or untwisting. The enhancing effect of polyamines or metallic cations on the binding of ER to ERE is presumably due to salt effects on charges repulsion of the DNA phosphate backbone. When charges are neutralized, the energy requirement for bending is lowered and thus the binding of the receptor to DNA is enhanced. This indicates that binding of ER to linear DNA is energetically less favorable than binding to bent DNA. DNA bending may be only the most energetically DNA configuration for interaction with the receptor and have no role in a regulatory function. However, the release of the free energy stored in the bend can be involved in the dissociation of receptor from DNA. Several studies have demonstrated that, in vitro, the receptor binds to ERR with similar affinity, regardless the presence of agonist or antagonist ligands (2,3). However, in electrophoretic mobility shift assays, all ER-antagonists complexes bound to the ERR migrate slower than ER-estradiol or ER-agonist complexes bound to the same ERJZ. In the absence of ligand intermediate shifted complexes are observed. These modifications in electrophoretic mobilities have been attributed to a ligand-induced conformational change of the complexes that occurs probably within the ligand-binding domain of the ER (2, 19, 20). The presence or absence of ligand do not influence the magnitude of the DNA- bend angle. This suggests that the ligand-induced conformational modification of ER changes neither
the affinity
of its DNA-binding
domain
for the target
DNA
nor
the magnitude of the induced-bend angle. These results indicate that the bending occurs as a result of ER protein binding to its cognate DNA target independently of its ligand-dependent conformation. 950
Vol.
185,
No.
3,
1992
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
What is the significance of DNA-bending in the mechanism of hormone action? Transcription initiation requires the establishement of multiproteic DNA complexes in which protein-protein interactions are involved (21). In these complexes the DNA conformation is likely to be important. It is generally considered that protein-induced DNA bending can facilitate interaction between proteins bound to separate sites on DNA. Transcriptional transactivation function of ER is induced by hormone, probably through ligand-dependent transconformation within the hormone binding domain (TAF-2) (22). This transconformation is not achieved in the presence of antagonists. In this context, it is conceivable that DNA bend may bring the receptor domain, involved in transcriptional activation (TAF-2), into close vicinity of other regulatory factor(s) enabling protein- protein interaction to occur. This paper was ready for publication when a similar study appeared (23), using the Xenopus laevis ER DNA-binding domain and finding 34” for the bending angle of a slightly different ERE DNA.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Dr. Sanker Adhya (NIH, Bethesda) for the gift of plasmid pBend2; Dr. Helene Richard-Foy for discussion of the manuscript; Philippe Astier for technical help and Jean-Claude Lambert for art work. This work was partially supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
REFERENCES
k 3. 4. 2 i: 9. ::* 12: ::: 15.
Beam, M. (1989) Cell, 56,335-344. Sabbah, M., Gouilleux, F., Sola, B., Redeuilh, G., and Baulieu, E.E. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88,390-394. Murdoch, F.E., Meier, D.A., Furlow, J.D., Grunwald, K.A.A., and Gorski, J. (1990) Biochemistry 29,8377-8385. Kim, J., Zwieb, C., Wu, C., and Adh a, S. (1989) Gene 85,15-23. Klock, G., Strahle, U., and Schiitz, ii . (1987) Nature 329,734-736. Redeuilh, G., Montcharmont, B., Secco, C., and Baulieu, E.E. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262,6969-6975. Laudon, H.C., and Griffith, J.D. (1987) Biochemistry 25,3759-3762. Fenerstein, B.G., Pattabiramau, N., and Marton, L.J. (1990) Nucl. Acids Res. 18,1271-1282. Thiescu, H.J., and Bach, C. (1991) B&hem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 176, 551-557. Thomas, T., and Kiang, D.T. (1987) Cancer Res. 47,1799-1804. Thomas, T., and Kiang, D.T. (1988) Nucl. Acids Res. 16,4705-4720. Kopka, L.M., Yoon, C., Goodsell, D., Pjura, P., and Dickerson, R.E. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82,1376-1380. Schwarbe, J.W.R., Neuhans, D., and Rhodes, D. (1990) Nature 348,458461. Luisi, B.F., Xu, W.X., Otwinowski, Z., Freedman, L.P., and Yamamoto, K.R. (1991) Nature 352,497~505. Wu, H.M., and Crothers, D.M. (1984) Nature 308,509-513. 951
Vol.
16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23.
185, No. 3, 1992
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Thompson, J.F., and Laudy, A. (1988) Nucl. Acids Res. 16,9687-9705. Gartenberg, M.R., and Crothers, D.M. (1988) Nature 333,824-829. Kotharz, D., Fritsch, A., and But, H. (1986) EMBO J. 5,799-803. Pakdel, F., and Katzenellenbogen, B.S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267,3429-3437. Danielian, P.S., White, R., Lees, J.A., and Parker, M.G. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 1025-1033. Mitchell, P.J., and Tjian, R. (1989) Science 245,371-378. Webster, N.J.G., Green, S., Jin, J.R., and Chambon, P. (1988) Cell 54, 199207. Nardulli, A.J., and Shapiro, D.J. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12,2037-2042.
952