FEMS Microbiology Letters Advance Access published July 17, 2015

1

Escherichia coli O8-antigen enhances biofilm formation under

2

agitated conditions

3 4

Akash Kumar1, Dhriti Mallik1, Shilpa Pal1, Sathi Mallick1, Sujoy Sarkar1, Ajoy

5

Chanda2, Anindya S. Ghosh1 *

6 7

Author details

8

1

9

Bengal, India, PIN-721302. 2Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of

10

Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West

Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India, PIN-721302

11 12 13

E-mail addresses:[email protected] (Akash Kumar), [email protected]

14

(Dhriti Mallik), [email protected] (Shilpa Pal), [email protected]

15

(Sathi Mallick), [email protected] (Sujoy K. Sarkar), [email protected]

16

(Ajoy Chanda) [email protected] (Anindya S. Ghosh)*Correspondence and

17

reprints.

18 19

*Correspondence:Anindya S. Ghosh

20

1

21

Bengal, India, PIN-721302.Tel.: +91-3222-283798, Fax: +91-3222-278707

Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West

22

1

23

Abstract

24

Bacterial surface components have a major role in the development of biofilms. In the

25

present study, the effect of Escherichia coli O8-antigen on biofilms was investigated

26

using two E. coli K-12 derived strains that differed only in the O8-antigen

27

biosynthesis. In presence of O8-antigen both bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation

28

slightly decreased under static conditions whereas a substantial increase in adhesion

29

and biofilm formation was observed under agitated conditions. It was noted that

30

irrespective of the O8-antigen status, the hydrophobic interactions played an

31

important role in bacterial adhesion under both static and agitated conditions.

32

However, under agitated conditions, the extent of bacterial adhesion in the O8-antigen

33

bearing strain was predominately determined by the electrostatic interactions. Results

34

showed that the presence of O8-antigen decreases the surface hydrophobicity and

35

surface charge. Moreover, O8-antigen facilitates adhesion on hydrophilic and

36

hydrophobic surfaces as revealed through the tests with modified substrata. Our

37

results indicate that O8-antigen, which appears dispensable for biofilm formation

38

under static conditions, actually enhances E. coli biofilm formation under agitated

39

conditions.

40 41

Keywords

42

Escherichia coli; Adhesion; Biofilm; O-antigen; Hydrophobic; Lipopolysaccharide.

43 44 45 46 47

2

48

Introduction

49

Biofilms are the communities of microorganisms encased within extracellular

50

polymeric substances, adhered to biotic or abiotic surfaces and often the cause of

51

persistent infections (Stewart & William Costerton, 2001). For example, the biofilms

52

of Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli formed on catheters and in the bladder

53

epithelium are commonly associated with the urinary tract infections (Nakao et al.,

54

2012). The Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a macromolecule present on the outer

55

membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria, has been discerned as one of the surface

56

structures that influences the bacterial adhesion (Walker et al., 2005). LPS consists of

57

three components: lipid A, core oligosaccharide and O-antigen, and provides

58

resistance against bile salts, hydrophobic antibiotics, complement system and

59

macrophages (Kong et al., 2012).

60

The O-antigens, attached to the core oligosaccharide, are responsible for

61

antigenic specificity and O-serogroup determination (DebRoy et al., 2011). The

62

mutants lacking O-antigens are defective either in the O-antigen (rfb) or in the LPS

63

core (rfa) gene cluster (Liu & Reeves, 1994). The OM of several E. coli K-12

64

laboratory strains have defective LPS core. This affects the O-antigen polysaccharide

65

side chain attachment to the core, resulting in the inability of the K-12 strains to

66

produce O-antigen (Liu & Reeves, 1994). However, O-antigen is usually present in

67

the pathogenic E. coli strains and plays a major role in pathogenesis (DebRoy et al.,

68

2011).

69

Previous studies have addressed the role of LPS on biofilm formation or

70

bacterial adhesion, the first step of biofilm formation. However these studies present

71

conflicting evidence with respect to O-antigen where its presence is associated with

3

72

either increased or decreased adhesion and/or biofilm formation (Cockerill et al.,

73

1996, Kierek & Watnick, 2003).

74

The E. coli O8-antigen is a linear homopolymer of α-mannose terminating in

75

3-O-methylmannose (Ghosh et al., 2006). The O8-antigen lowers the deformities that

76

appear in the penicillin-binding protein (PBP) deletion mutants and increases the

77

susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics (Ghosh et al., 2006, Sarkar & Ghosh, 2008).

78

In this work, attempts are made to determine the role of O-antigen in the process of

79

biofilm formation using two E. coli K-12 derived strains, differing only with respect

80

to the O8-antigen biosynthesis (Rick et al., 1994). To the best of our knowledge so far

81

no study has simultaneously compared the effect of O-antigen on biofilm formation

82

under both static and agitated conditions. Most of the previous studies are performed

83

under static conditions, though the conditions in the human host or in the environment

84

are rarely static. Therefore, the goal of this study was to demarcate the differences in

85

the biofilm-forming abilities of these strains under both static and agitated conditions.

86 87

Materials and Methods

88

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

89

Strains derived from E. coli K-12 were used in this study. E. coli AB1133 is

90

an O-antigen-deficient strain; and E. coli 2443 strain possess intact rfbO8 gene cluster

91

and synthesizes O8-antigen (Rick et al., 1994). The strains were grown in Luria

92

Bertani (LB) broth and/or agar (Hi-Media). Unless otherwise specified, chemicals and

93

reagents were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., (St. Louis, MO, USA).

94

4

95 96

Statistical analysis The mean value of the experimental data was represented in bar graphs with

97

error bars showing standard deviation in the results section. The statistical

98

significance (P value) of the data was determined by performing an unpaired, two-

99

tailed t test using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). For

100

additional confirmation of the level of significance, a one-way analysis of variance

101

(ANOVA) was performed. To compare the change in different parameters, fold

102

difference was calculated which is defined as the ratio of values between the strains,

103

provided the ratio ≥ 1 or, its reciprocal if the ratio is < 1.

104

Biofilm formation assay

105

Biofilm formation was assessed in 24-well polystyrene tissue culture plates as

106

described previously (Kumar et al., 2012), with little modifications. In brief, each

107

well having 900 µL of LB was inoculated with 100 µL of culture (OD600 nm ~ 0.2) and

108

the plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C under static or agitated conditions

109

(agitated continuously at 90 rpm in an orbital shaker). For microscopy of biofilms,

110

polystyrene coupons were placed along with the culture in the wells of the microtiter

111

plate. The biofilms formed were stained with 0.1% crystal violet (CV). Excess stain

112

was washed and the absorbance of the retained CV extracted with 33% acetic acid

113

was measured at 600 nm. Biofilm Formation Index (BFI) for each well was calculated

114

using the formula, BFI = (B-C)/G, where, B is the stain released from the test

115

wells, C is the stained control wells and G is the absorbance of cell density in broth.

116

The experiments were repeated for at least six times.

117

5

118 119

Microscopic analysis of biofilms Biofilms grown on polystyrene coupons were rinsed with PBS (pH 7.0), fixed

120

with 2% glutaraldehyde, dehydrated in ethanol and observed through scanning

121

electron microscopy (SEM) at 1000× magnification (JSM5800 JEOL, Japan). For

122

fluorescence microscopy, the biofilms stained with BacLight Live/Dead dye

123

(Invitrogen Inc., CA, USA) were visualized at 200× magnification using OLYMPUS

124

IX 81 fluorescence microscope (Olympus Inc., Japan).

125 126 127

COMSTAT analysis For quantitative evaluation, biofilms were stained with 0.01% (wt/vol)

128

acridine orange for 15 min and washed to remove the excess stain. Images were

129

acquired using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) FV1000 (Olympus Inc.,

130

Japan) through 40× objective lens. Five image stacks, each containing five optically

131

sectioned images (512- by 512-pixel tagged image file format) per strain were

132

collected at random. COMSTAT software was used to analyze the acquired Z-stacks

133

images to determine the biovolume and mean thickness of the biofilms (Heydorn et

134

al., 2000).

135 136

Adhesion assay

137

To check bacterial adhesion, 1 mL of bacterial suspensions in LB (OD600 nm ~

138

0.5) with or without Tween 80 (0.1%) or 100 mM NaCl, were incubated at 37 °C for

139

1 h in either static or agitated conditions. Unattached cells were removed and the

140

adherent bacteria were stained with CV for 15 min. After removing the excess dye,

141

retained CV was solubilized in 33% acetic acid and Adhesion Index (AI) was 6

142

calculated in a manner similar to BFI. Experiments were repeated for at least six

143

times.

144 145

Determination of the cell surface hydrophobicity

146

Bacterial cell surface hydrophobicity was assessed using Microbial Adhesion

147

To Hydrocarbons (MATH) and by measuring the contact angles (θw) (Van der Mei et

148

al., 2003, Saxena et al., 2009). MATH was measured using overnight grown cells

149

washed and resuspended (OD600 nm ~ 0.5) in PUM buffer (100 mM K2HPO4, 50 mM

150

KH2PO4, 30 mM Urea, 1 mM MgSO4). Cell suspensions were vigorously mixed with

151

n-hexadecane and the mixture was incubated at room temperature to allow

152

partitioning of the phases. The absorbance of the lower aqueous phase was measured

153

at OD600 nm and Hydrophobicity index (HPBI) was calculated as the change in

154

percentage from the original absorbance (Ao) to the final absorbance (Af) upon

155

hexadecane exposure [HPBI = (Ao−Af)/Ao×100]. Each experiment was repeated at

156

least for three times.

157

Water contact angles (θw) was measured on the lawns of bacterial strains using

158

the sessile drop technique (Van der Mei et al., 2003). In brief, centrifuged cell

159

suspension (OD600 ~ 1.0) was deposited and air dried on polystyrene surface. The

160

stable ‘plateau contact angles’ of the water droplets were measured with a Goniometer

161

(Rame-Hart 190-F2, Rame-Hart Instrument Co., Netcong, NJ, USA) in triplicate for

162

each strain.

163 164 165 166

Surface charge measurements Bacterial surface charge was estimated by measuring the zeta potential (Van der Mei et al., 2003). Washed cells suspended in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer 7

167

(pH 7.2) were dispensed into zeta cells and the zeta potential of each sample was

168

determined using a zeta-sizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments, UK). The experiments

169

were performed at least three times for each culture.

170 171

Silane coating and Plasma treatment

172

To increase the hydrophobicity of the polystyrene, an organosilane

173

(Dimethyldichlorosilane) was coated on the polystyrene plate and air-dried. Each

174

plate was later rinsed with 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) just before

175

use (Cunliffe et al., 1999). To increase the hydrophilicity, polystyrene plates were

176

treated with atmospheric pressure plasma by employing a plasma generator, as

177

described elsewhere (Atmospheric Pressure Plasma ULS series, Acxys Technologies,

178

France) (Saxena et al., 2009).

179 180

Results and discussion

181

O8-antigen enhances biofilm formation under agitated conditions

182

Biofilm forming ability of E. coli 2443 (O8-antigen present) and AB1133 (O8-

183

antigen deficient) (Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Figure 2) was

184

analyzed semi-quantitatively, under both static and agitated conditions (Figure 1a).

185

Under static conditions 2443 (2443-S) strain produced 22% (P< 0.05) less biofilm

186

than AB1133 (AB1133-S). However, under agitated conditions 2443(2443-A)

187

produced 96% (P< 0.001) more biofilm as compared to AB1133 (AB1133-A). The

188

formed biofilms, visualized through SEM (Figure 2a) and fluorescence microscopy

189

(Figure 2b) showed enhanced level of biofilm formation in both the cultures grown

190

under agitated conditions as compared to the static conditions. LIVE/DEAD staining

191

did not show any significant difference in the cellular viability of biofilms, regardless

8

192

of the strain or condition. COMSTAT analysis of the image stacks of biofilms showed

193

2443 under agitated conditions had higher biovolume (~1.3 fold; P< 0.05) and mean

194

thickness (~1.3 fold; P< 0.05) than AB1133 biofilms (Table 1).

195 196

O8-antigen enhances bacterial adhesion under agitated conditions

197

Bacterial adhesion was assessed to check whether variation in biofilm

198

formation was linked to it. E. coli 2443 under static condition was 21% less adherent

199

(P< 0.05) than AB1133 (Figure 1b), but under agitated conditions was 82% more

200

adherent (P < 0.001) than AB1133. The adhesion results corresponded closely with

201

the biofilm formation values (correlation coefficient r2 > 0.95), which affirmed that

202

the bacterial adhesion is the main factor that accounts for the observed variation in

203

biofilm formation under both conditions. Similar results were reported in an another

204

study with adherent-invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC) strains where the higher

205

adhesion indices of both AIEC and non-AIEC strains correlated with higher specific

206

biofilm formation indices (Martinez-Medina et al., 2009). In another report, the

207

attachment of E. coli K-12 strain to surfaces, mimicking cellular interfaces, presented

208

significant differences between stagnant and flowing conditions (Barth et al., 2008).

209

Such observations illustrate that cell surface structure and composition affects

210

adhesion in different ways under different conditions.

211 212 213

Hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions influence bacterial adhesion To ascertain the role of hydrophobic and/or electrostatic interactions in

214

bacterial adhesion, adhesion assays were performed in the presence of NaCl and

215

Tween 80. Tween 80 (a surfactant) reduces hydrophobic interactions while NaCl

216

supplies counter-ions for blocking electrostatic interactions (Crittenden et al., 2001).

9

217

The addition of Tween 80 decreased adhesion under both the conditions in both the

218

strains (Figure 3). In static conditions, the level of adhesion decreased by 63 and 56%

219

in AB1133 and 2443, respectively (P < 0.001 in both cases), while under agitated

220

conditions, AB1133 and 2443 depicted a decrease in adhesion by 50 and 51%,

221

respectively (P < 0.001 in both cases). This suggests that hydrophobic interactions are

222

important for adhesion, irrespective of the O8-antigen status of the strains.

223

The presence of NaCl, which interferes with electrostatic interactions, did not

224

markedly affect the adhesion under static conditions in both the strains. This shows

225

under static conditions, presence or absence of O8-antigen had little effect on

226

electrostatic interactions and consequently on bacterial adhesion. Similarly, presence

227

of NaCl did not affect AB1133 adhesion under agitated conditions; however, it

228

decreased the adhesion of 2443 by ~30% (P < 0.05). As the electrostatic interactions

229

among the molecules reduces in the presence of high concentration of salts like NaCl

230

(Volle et al., 2008), the significant decrease in the adhesion of 2443 strain under

231

agitated conditions implies the involvement of an electrostatic component in the

232

adhesion events that diminishes when the participating charged groups of O8-antigen

233

are shielded by additional salt molecules.

234

Taken as a whole, adhesion assay indicated that hydrophobic interactions play

235

an important role under both conditions irrespective of the O8-antigen status.

236

However, in the presence of O8-antigen and under agitated conditions, electrostatic

237

interactions have a crucial role in adhesion.

238 239

10

239 240

O8-antigen decreases both surface hydrophobicity and surface charge

241

Cell surface hydrophobicity is an important factor associated with the

242

attachment, and increased cell hydrophobicity is associated with increased adhesion

243

(McEldowney & Fletcher, 1986). Bacterial cell surface hydrophobicity, as determined

244

by the bacterial adhesion to hydrocarbons and the contact angle measurement,

245

revealed that growth conditions, i.e., static or agitated, do not affect the surface

246

hydrophobicity of the cell (Figure 4). More importantly, AB1133 was significantly

247

more hydrophobic than 2443 (~1.6 fold; P< 0.05 for both tests, under both conditions)

248

suggesting that O8-antigen decreases surface hydrophobicity in bacterial cells. This

249

might lead to diminution in the hydrophobic interactions and ultimately resulting in

250

decreased adhesion, as in the case of 2443 under static conditions. It is proposed that

251

the hydrophobic lipid A embedded in the outer membrane imparts cell surface

252

hydrophobicity (Boyer et al., 2011) and O-antigen, a predominantly hydrophilic

253

polymer, masks the hydrophobic properties of lipid A. Therefore, its absence

254

enhances hydrophobicity of the cells (Boyer et al., 2011). It is also demonstrated that

255

bacteria with long O-antigen show decreased adhesion as compared to those lacking

256

an O-antigen layer (Salerno et al., 2004).

257

Earlier studies have revealed that surface charge plays a significant role in

258

bacterial aggregation and adhesion (Kłodzińska et al., 2010). When measured, zeta

259

potential of AB1133 was significantly more negative than that of 2443 (~3 fold; P

Escherichia coli O8-antigen enhances biofilm formation under agitated conditions.

Bacterial surface components have a major role in the development of biofilms. In the present study, the effect of Escherichia coli O8-antigen on biof...
506KB Sizes 1 Downloads 9 Views