Journal of Clinical Densitometry: Assessment & Management of Musculoskeletal Health, vol. 17, no. 1, 156e162, 2014 Ó Copyright 2014 by The International Society for Clinical Densitometry 1094-6950/17:156e162/$36.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2013.04.001

Section V: Bone Patho-Physiology

Enhanced Bone Mass and Physical Fitness in Prepubescent Basketball Players Anis Zribi,*,1 Mohamed Zouch,1 Hamada Chaari,1 Elyes Bouajina,2 Monia Zouali,1 Ammar Nebigh,1 and Zouhair Tabka1 1

Laboratoire de Physiologie et des Explorations Fonctionnelles, Universite de Sousse, Faculte de Medecine Ibn Eljazzar, Sousse, Tunisia; and 2Service de Rhumatologie, CHU Farhat Hached, Sousse, Tunisia

Abstract The aim of this study was to examine the effect of basketball practice on bone acquisition in the prepubertal age. In total, 48 prepubescent male basketball players aged 11.1  0.8 yr, Tanner stage 1, were compared with 50 controls matched for age and pubertal stage. Areal bone mineral density, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone area (BA) in deferent sites associated with anthropometric parameters were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Running and jumping tests were performed. Analysis of Student’s impaired t-test revealed that basketball players attained better results in all physical fitness tests ( p ! 0.05). They also exhibited significantly greater BMC and BA in whole body, upper and lower extremities, trochanter, total hip, and whole right and left radius ( p ! 0.001) compared with the controls. No significant differences were observed between groups in right and left ultradistal and third distal radius and spinal regions, BMC, and BA, whereas a significant positive correlation was reported between lean mass, BMC, and BA of lower limbs. In summary, basketball practice in prepubertal age is associated with improved physical fitness and enhanced lean and bone mass in loaded sites. Key Words: BMC; bone area; prepubescent; regular training.

(BMC) and BMD in controlled trials is in the order of 2e5% per year (2). Kannus et al (4) reported a 2.5 times greater benefit from racquet sports in the premenarchal years compared with the same activity begun after menarche. In addition, the bone mass acquisition in childhood persists for 7 months (7) to 3 years after exercise cessation (8). Studies in children showed the increase of the accrual of BMD from weight bearing physical activities practice particularly in weight-loaded skeletal regions (9,10). In gymnasts, the higher values of BMD in the whole body (11), spine, and lower extremities (9) compared with nonactive counterparts are due to the higher ground reaction forces, which are close to 10 times body mass in young gymnast (12). Soccer participation is associated with enhanced trochanteric BMC and increased femoral and lumbar spine BMD in prepubertal boys (13) and enhanced whole body, lumbar spine, femoral neck, pelvis, and lower limbs BMD and BMC (14). There is increasing evidence that weight-bearing sporting activities involving rapid directional changes, starts, stops, and

Introduction Physical activity has been described as a strategy to optimize skeletal development and widely recommended as one of the key preventative strategies to reduce the risk of osteoporosis, falls, and fractures (1). In adults, exercise produces modest increases in bone mineral density (BMD) of only 1e3% per year (2). By contrast, physical activities undertaken in childhood, particularly activities that apply large forces quickly, convey optimal benefits to bone mass, size, and structure (3). The pre- and early pubertal years seem to be the period with the greatest responsiveness (4e6). The average gain in bone mineral content Received 11/06/12; Revised 03/16/13; Accepted 04/05/13. *Address correspondence to: Anis Zribi, Laboratoire de Physiologie et des Explorations Fonctionnelles, Universite de Sousse, Faculte de Medecine Ibn Eljazzar, Sousse, Tunisia. E-mail: anis_zribi@ hotmail.fr

156

Bone Mass and Physical Fitness in Basketball Players great reaction forces enhance bone mineral accrual in prepubertal age (13,14). Basketball, a weight-bearing intermittent sport, is played worldwide by more than 450 million people (15). During the match, players cover about 4500e5000 m with a variety of multidirectional movements such as running, starts, stops, shuffling and dribbling at variable velocities, and jumping (16). Upper extremities are also solicited in many actions such as dribbling, throwing, and blocking the ball. These actions generate strain and compressive forces and stimulate bone remodeling process (17). Therefore, basketball may be considered as an excellent osteogenic sport for adults and adolescents (18). It has been reported that adolescent basketball players displayed greater bone mass in most of the measured sites compared with swimmers and nonathletes (18). Participation of male adolescents in a range of high-impact activities such as basketball for 1 h or more a day is associated with greater bone size and mineral content, especially at the hip (19). However, to the best of our knowledge, the effects of practicing basketball, osteogenic sport for adults and adolescents, on bone mass and their effects in prepubertal age have not been studied. The purpose of this study was to determine whether prepubescent boys practicing basketball for 3 h/wk for at least 1 yr have additional osteogenic effects compared with those obtained from the compulsory school education session. We hypothesized that prepubescent children practicing basketball would have greater enhancement in bone mass than control subjects matched for age and pubertal stage.

157 The Calcium Intake The amount of calcium consumed per day (mg/d) was measured by using the Bilnut SCDA Nutrisoft (Cerelles, France) program.

Bone Measurements Areal BMD (aBMD, g/cm2), BMC (g), and bone area (BA, cm2) for the whole body; lumbar spine (L2eL4); femoral neck of the dominant leg, right, and left radius; lean mass (kg); and fat mass (kg) were measured by dual-energy Xray absorptiometry (DXA) using Lunar Prodigy (model DXAP 2004, software version 3.6; GE Healthcare, Madison, WI). The coefficients of variation of aBMD, BMC, and BA were less than 1% in lumbar spine, femoral neck, and whole body and 2.5% in upper and lower limbs.

Physical Fitness Aerobic Maximal Power VO2

max

The maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max) was estimated by the multistage 20-m shuttle-test (20).

Anaerobic Capacity Anaerobic capacity was estimated by using 300-m running test.

Running Speed Test Photoelectric cell (Cell Kit Speed Brower, USA) was used to measure the time needed to run 30 m.

Jump Tests

Materials and Methods Subjects Ninety-eight healthy boys aged 10e12 yr belonging to Tanner stage 1 participated in this cross-sectional study. They were divided into 2 groups depending on their physical patterns. Forty-eight were assigned to the basketball group (BG) as, in addition to a weekly physical education session at school, they practiced basketball in a primary training center for 3 h/wk for at least 1 yr (1.4  0.1 yr). The other 50, participated only in the compulsory physical education curriculum at school (1 weekly session of 50 min), were assigned to the control group (CG). This study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee of Farhat Hached Tunisian Hospital and had been led according to the World Health Organization’s recommendation elaborated at Helsinki. All children’s parents were asked to read and sign an informed consent document before participation.

Anthropometric Measurements Standard calibrated scale and stadiometer were used to determine height and body mass in stockinged feet and underwear to the nearest 5 mm and 100 g, respectively. Body mass index (BMI) was then calculated (body mass/height2).

Squat jump and countermovement jump were performed using an Opto Jump (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) and horizontal jump and 5-jump test (21) using a dual Dkm.

Basal Physical Activity Level Basal activity level was calculated by using the Bratteby’s questionnaire, which estimates the level of daily physical activities during a typical day without basketball training (22).

Pubertal Status Tanner pubertal status was determined by serum rates of follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and testosterone (23) and confirmed by a clinical method of recognized validity and reliability (24).

Statistical Analysis Means (standard deviation) are given as descriptive statistics. Differences between groups were established using Student’s unpaired t-test. The analyses of covariance entering height and lean mass as covariates were performed to evaluate differences in BMC and BA between the 2 groups. Bivariate correlation and linear stepwise multiple regression was applied to identify the relationship between lean mass and bone variables. Statistical significance was set at p ! 0.05.

Journal of Clinical Densitometry: Assessment & Management of Musculoskeletal Health

Volume 17, 2014

158

Zribi et al.

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica software (version 6.0 2001; StatSoft, Maisons-Alfort, France).

Table 2 Physical Fitness Measurements for Basketball Players and Control Subjects (Mean  SD)

Results Anthropometric Measures

Variables

The subject’s age, anthropometric, and body composition data are summarized in Table 1. BGs and CGs were similar in age, BMI, fat mass, and dietary calcium intake, but the basketball players were taller, heavier, and had higher lean mass in upper, lower limbs and in whole body than the controls ( p ! 0.05).

VO2max (mL/kg/min) T30 (s) T300 (s) SJ (cm) CMJ (cm) HJ (m) 5-Jump test (m) PAL

Physical Fitness As shown in Table 2, the basal physical activity did not show any significant difference between the 2 groups, but the basketball players showed better performances in all physical fitness tests.

Basketball players 48.9 5.81 60.83 21.83 25.03 1.51 8.66 34.54

       

2.31 0.43 0.99 2.06 2.23 0.14 0.44 3.59

Controls

p Value

       

!0.01 !0.05 !0.01 !0.01 !0.01 !0.01 !0.01 NS

42.54 6.04 69.81 19.36 22.7 1.27 7.93 33.56

2.16 0.51 1.54 1.68 1.81 0.12 0.36 2.56

Abbr: CMJ, countermovement jump (cm); HJ, horizontal jump; NS, nonsignificant; PAL, physical activity level; SD, standard deviation; SJ, squat jump (cm); T30, time in 30 m (s); T300, time in 300 m (s); VO2max, maximum oxygen uptake (mL/kg/min).

Bone Measurements After adjustment for height and lean mass, whole-body DXA scans did not reveal any significant difference in aBMD between groups in most sites, except in right and left legs; basketball players showed greater aBMD in right (0.99  0.11 vs 0.95  0.06; p 5 0.003) and left leg (0.99  0.11 vs 0.95  0.06; p 5 0.001). BMC and BA values adjusted for height and lean mass are displayed in Tables 3 and 4. The basketball players exhibited significantly greater BMC and BA in whole body, upper and lower limbs, trochanter, total hip, and whole radius for right and left forearms compared with the control subjects Table 1 Subject’s Age, Anthropometric, Calcium Intake, and Pubertal Status (Means  SD) Variables Age (yr) Height (cm) Weight (kg) Lean mass, right arm (kg) Lean mass, left arm (kg) Lean mass, right leg (kg) Lean mass, left leg (kg) Lean mass (kg) Fat mass (kg) BMI (kg/m2) Calcium intake (mg)/d FSH (mUI/mL) LH (mUI/mL) Testosterone (mUI/mL)

Basketball players 11.1 150 38.8 1.3 1.4 5 5 29 6.8 17.2 719 2.17 2.28 0.49

             

0.8 8 7.6 0.3 0.3 0.9 0.9 4.6 3.5 2.5 4.32 1.19 1.52 0.65

Controls

p Value

             

NS !0.05 !0.05 !0.05 !0.05 !0.05 !0.05 !0.05 NS NS NS NS NS NS

11.2 144 35 1.2 1.3 4.5 4.6 26.8 5.4 16.9 721 2.1 2.05 0.31

0.7 5 5 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.6 2.9 3.7 1.8 2.44 1.54 1.24 0.22

Abbr: BMI, body mass index; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; NS, nonsignificant; SD, standard deviation.

( p ! 0.001), whereas controls showed higher head BMC ( p ! 0.01). No significant differences were observed between groups in both right and left ultradistal and third distal radius, femoral neck, and lumbar spine BMC and BA (Tables 3 and 4). A close correlation was observed between right and left legs lean mass and BMC (r 5 0.9 and r 5 0.9, respectively; p ! 0.001) and BA (r 5 0.88 and r 5 0.89, respectively; p ! 0.001) of lower limbs (Fig. 1).

Discussion Two major findings emerge from this study. First, loading from basketball participation is the most significant contributor to increased BMC and BA among prepubescent boys. Second, basketball participation is associated with better physical fitness and enhanced lean mass in upper and lower limbs. These findings are consistent with results of previous studies in which bone mass was positively related to physical activity in children in Tanner stage 1 (25,26). DXA scans revealed significant enhanced BMC and BA in whole body, upper and lower limbs, trochanter, and total hip of basketball players compared with controls (Tables 3 and 4). Our results agree with previous studies showing increases in BMC and BA in the weight-bearing bones associated with prepubertal stages (14,25,27) but contrast others, which showed no obvious BA variation in prepubescent soccer players (28). The main effects of skeletal loading induced by basketball practice were at bone sites that consisted of predominantly trabecular bone (trochanter and total hip). These data support the view that trabecular bones are more responsive to mechanical load than cortical ones. Surprisingly, lumbar spine (L2eL4), which consists of trabecular bone, seems to be not sensitive enough to mechanical stress elicited by basketball practice. Similar findings were

Journal of Clinical Densitometry: Assessment & Management of Musculoskeletal Health

Volume 17, 2014

Bone Mass and Physical Fitness in Basketball Players

159

Table 3 Cross-sectional Analysis of Bone Parameters (BMC) Adjusted for Height and Lean Mass in Whole Body, Radius, Spinal, and Femoral Regions Between Basketball Players and Control Subjects (Means  SD) Variables Whole body Head Right arm Left arm Right leg Left leg Radius regions Right ultradistal radius Right third distal radius Left ultradistal radius Left third distal radius Whole right radius Whole left radius Spinal regions Lumbar spine (L2eL4) Femoral regions Femoral neck Trochanter Total hip

Basketball players 1510.3 342.63 72.2 74.6 299.9 300.1

     

308.4 27.69 19.6 18.9 77.6 79

0.79 1.15 0.8 1.13 4.3 4.23

     

0.16 0.16 0.18 0.17 1 0.91

Controls

p Value

1367 356.31 65.1 67.4 254.4 257.5

     

157.4 37.64 10.3 11.7 40.5 40.9

!0.001 !0.01 !0.01 !0.001 !0.001 !0.001

0.76 1.11 0.78 1.1 3.9 3.89

     

0.12 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.6 0.61

NS NS NS NS !0.01 !0.01

22.5  4.5

21.6  3.4

NS

2.7  0.9 6.2  2.2 21.5  4.9

2.6  0.6 5.3  1.2 19.7  2.5

NS !0.01 !0.01

Abbr: BMC, bone mineral content; NS, nonsignificant; SD, standard deviation.

Table 4 Cross-sectional Analysis of Bone Parameters (BA) Adjusted for Weight and Lean Mass in Whole Body, Radius, Spinal, and Femoral Regions Between Basketball Players and Control Subjects (Means  SD) Variables Whole body Head Right arm Left arm Right leg Left leg Radius regions Right ultradistal radius Right third distal radius Left ultradistal radius Left third distal radius Whole right radius Whole left radius Spinal regions Lumbar spine (L2eL4) Femoral regions Femoral neck Trochanter Total hip

Basketball players

Controls

p Value

1576.9 215.3 103.6 109.1 298.3 297.5

     

227.9 10.7 22.4 20.8 46 45.6

1457.8 223 95.1 99.9 266.3 268.7

     

130.2 25.8 12.4 14.4 30 31.9

!0.001 NS !0.01 !0.01 !0.01 !0.001

2.89 2.37 2.92 2.38 11 11.04

     

0.27 0.21 0.45 0.26 1.7 1.57

2.84 2.32 2.88 2.32 10.5 10.42

     

0.27 0.20 0.26 0.17 1.1 1.06

NS NS NS NS !0.01 !0.01

29.6  3.9

28.4  3.3

NS

2.88  0.89 8.3  2.1 23.8  3.9

2.87  0.68 7.3  1.4 21.9  2.2

NS !0.01 !0.01

Abbr: BA, bone area; NS, nonsignificant; SD, standard deviation. Journal of Clinical Densitometry: Assessment & Management of Musculoskeletal Health

Volume 17, 2014

160

Zribi et al.

Fig. 1. Correlations between lean mass of right and left legs and BMC and bone area of lower limbs in basketball players. BMC, bone mineral content. reported by Haapasalo et al (29) among prepubertal and peripubertal female tennis players. The significant increase in spine BMD among those children appeared only at pubertal age, supporting the view that structural benefits may need longer period before reaching significance (30). So, we expect such results for our BG especially in the pubertal age, marked by hormonal impregnations. According to this cross-sectional study, basketball players showed greater BMC and BA in whole radius for 2 forearms but not in third and ultradistal radius. Our results contrast with those presented by Dowthwaite et al (31) among premenarchal gymnasts. These differences may be attributable to the variation of mechanical stress induced by every sport modality in the stimulated region. Furthermore, it has been showed that the osteogenic response to loading in humerus was greater in peri- compared with prepubertal male tennis players (32). This suggests that improving bone mass in third and ultradistal radius bones may need longer period of basketball training. Elevated BMC and BA levels of lower limbs found in young basketball players compared with controls is an indicator of responsive loaded sites to the significant amount of mechanical loads induced by basketball practice in prepubertal age. In fact, during running, sprinting, starts, stops, and jumping actions, loading bones are under tensile, compressive,

shear, bending, and torsional stress, which produce high strains stimulus on lower body. This confirms Yang PF’s findings, suggesting that basketball rebounding induced greater principal strains than normal activities (33). Interestingly, young basketball players also reported better performances in all physical tests and higher lean mass in whole body and in right and left leg. Similar findings were reported by Vicente-Rodriguez et al (13,34) among prepubescent soccer players. This supports the view that there is a link between lean mass and physical activity participation. Furthermore, our data clearly demonstrate a positive correlation between lean mass, BMC, and BA of lower limbs (Fig. 1). Thus, the mechanical forces that act on the lower limbs may be generated not only by the high reaction forces produced by impact with the ground in running, sprinting, and jumping but also by muscular contractions pulling on their bony attachment. This finding is in accordance with previous knowledge (35), showing that physical activity has not only a direct osteogenic effect on bone mass but also an indirect effect through its relationship with lean mass (36). Interestingly, young basketball players showed lower head BMC than controls but no variation in head BA between them. Similarly, Courteix et al (37) reported significantly lower head BMC in gymnasts compared with swimmers and controls ( p ! 0.001). This could be explained by the fact

Journal of Clinical Densitometry: Assessment & Management of Musculoskeletal Health

Volume 17, 2014

Bone Mass and Physical Fitness in Basketball Players that response to mechanical loads elicited by basketball practice, there could be a transfer of calcium from nonloaded (head) to the loaded bearing bones (lower limbs). This concept of calcium transfer seems to be an important physiological mechanism that could also explain bone adaptation observed in bedridden subjects and astronauts. In fact, after a long space flight, a bone loss was reported at bone bearing sites, whereas no change at nonbearing sites among astronauts (38). Despite the enhancement in BMC and BA of loaded bones responsive to mechanical forces produced by basketball practice through impact with the ground in running, sprinting, jumping, and muscular contractions pulling on their bony attachment, we reported no variation in aBMD in most sites except in lower limbs. This could be explained by the low amount of daily calcium intake by our basketball players (720 mg/d), which is roughly half recommended by the official Institute of Medicine (1300 mg/d) and especially the lack of hormonal impregnations in prepubescent period. Probably, a longer training period is needed to lead to better benefits in aBMD. In conclusion, 2 sessions (90 min each) per week of basketball practice is associated with better physical fitness, lean mass hypertrophy in whole body, upper and lower limbs, and enhanced BMC and BA in loaded sites among prepubescent boys.

161

10.

11. 12.

13. 14.

15. 16. 17. 18.

Acknowledgments The authors thank the staff of the Rheumatology and Biochemistry departments for their excellent technical assistance.

References 1. Nikander R, Siev€anen H, Heinonen A, et al. 2010 Targeted exercise against osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis for optimising bone strength throughout life. BMC Med 8:47. 2. Suominen H. 2006 Muscle training for bone strength. Aging Clin Exp Res 18(2):85e93. 3. Gunter KB, Almstedt HC, Janz KF. 2012 Physical activity in childhood may be the key to optimizing lifespan skeletal health. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 40(1):13e21. 4. Kannus P, Haapasalo H, Sankelo M, et al. 1995 Effect of starting age of physical activity on bone mass in the dominant arm of tennis and squash players. Ann Intern Med 123(1):27e31. 5. Bass SL, Saxon L, Daly RM, et al. 2002 The effect of mechanical loading on the size and shape of bone in pre-, peri-, and postpubertal girls: a study in tennis players. J Bone Miner Res 17(12):2274e2280. 6. Heinonen A, Sievanen H, Kannus P, et al. 2000 High-impact exercise and bones of growing girls: a 9-month controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 11(12):1010e1017. 7. Fuchs RK, Snow CM. 2002 Gains in hip bone mass from highimpact training are maintained: a randomized controlled trial in children. J Pediatr 141(3):357e362. 8. Gunter K, Baxter-Jones A, Mirwald R, et al. 2008 Jump starting skeletal health: a 4-year longitudinal study assessing the effects of jumping on skeletal development in pre and circum pubertal children. Bone 42(4):710e718. 9. Nickols-Richardson SM, Modlesky CM, O’Connor PJ, Lewis RD. 2000 Premenarcheal gymnasts possess higher bone

19.

20. 21. 22.

23.

24. 25. 26.

27.

mineral density than controls. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32(1): 63e69. Nordstrom P, Pettersson U, Lorentzon R. 1998 Type of physical activity, muscle strength, and pubertal stage as determinants of bone mineral density and bone area in adolescent boys. J Bone Miner Res 13(7):1141e1148. Cassell C, Benedict M, Specker B. 1996 Bone mineral density in elite 7- to 9-yr-old female gymnasts and swimmers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28(10):1243e1246. Daly RM, Rich PA, Klein R, Bass S. 1999 Effects of highimpact exercise on ultrasonic and biochemical indices of skeletal status: a prospective study in young male gymnasts. J Bone Miner Res 14(7):1222e1230. Vicente-Rodriguez G, Jimenez-Ramirez J, Ara I, et al. 2003 Enhanced bone mass and physical fitness in prepubescent footballers. Bone 33(5):853e859. Nebigh A, Rebai H, Elloumi M, et al. 2009 Bone mineral density of young boy soccer players at different pubertal stages: relationships with hormonal concentration. Joint Bone Spine 76(1): 63e69. Schiltz M, Lehance C, Maquet D, et al. 2009 Explosive strength imbalances in professional basketball players. J Athl Train 44(1):39e47. Crisafulli A, Melis F, Tocco F, et al. 2002 External mechanical work versus oxidative energy consumption ratio during a basketball field test. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 42(4):409e417. Creighton DL, Morgan AL, Boardley D, Brolinson PG. 2001 Weight-bearing exercise and markers of bone turnover in female athletes. J Appl Physiol 90(2):565e570. Dias Quiterio AL, Carnero EA, Baptista FM, Sardinha LB. 2011 Skeletal mass in adolescent male athletes and nonathletes: relationships with high-impact sports. J Strength Cond Res 25(12): 3439e3447. Ginty F, Rennie KL, Mills L, et al. 2005 Positive, site-specific associations between bone mineral status, fitness, and time spent at high-impact activities in 16- to 18-year-old boys. Bone 36(1): 101e110. Leger L, Lambert J. 1982 A maximal multistage 20 meter shuttle test to predict VO2max. Eur J Appl Physiol 49(1):1e12. Chamari K, Chaouachi A, Hambli M, et al. 2008 The five-jump test for distance as a field test to assess lower limb explosive power in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 22(3):944e950. Bratteby LE, Sandhagen B, Fan H, Samuelson G. 1997 A 7-day activity diary for assessment of daily energy expenditure validated by the doubly labeled water method in adolescents. Eur J Clin Nutr 51(9):585e591. Jaakkola T, Ding YQ, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, et al. 1990 The ratios of serum bioactive/immunoreactive luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone in various clinical conditions with increased and decreased gonadotropin secretion: reevaluation by a highly sensitive immunometric assay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:1496e1505. Duke PM, Litt IF, Gross RT. 1980 Adolescents’ self assessment of sexual maturation. Pediatrics 6:918e920. MacKelvie KJ, Petit MA, Khan KM, et al. 2004 Bone mass and structure are enhanced following a 2-year randomized controlled trial of exercise in prepubertal boys. Bone 34(4):755e764. Linden C, Ahlborg HG, Besjakov J, et al. 2006 A school curriculum-based exercise program increases bone mineral accrual and bone size in prepubertal girls: two-year data from the pediatric osteoporosis prevention (POP) study. J Bone Miner Res 21(6):829e835. Sanchis-Moysi J, Dorado C, Olmedillas H, et al. 2010 Bone mass in prepubertal tennis players. Int J Sports Med 31(6): 416e420.

Journal of Clinical Densitometry: Assessment & Management of Musculoskeletal Health

Volume 17, 2014

162 28. Zouch M, Jaffre C, Thomas T, et al. 2008 Long-term soccer practice increases bone mineral content gain in prepubescent boys. Joint Bone Spine 75(1):41e49. 29. Haapasalo H, Kannus P, Sievanen H, et al. 1998 Effect of longterm unilateral activity on bone mineral density of female junior tennis players. J Bone Miner Res 13(2):310e319. 30. Alwis G, Linden C, Stenevi-Lundgren S, et al. 2008 A one-year exercise intervention program in pre-pubertal girls does not influence hip structure. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:9. 31. Dowthwaite JN, Flowers PP, Spadaro JA, Scerpella TA. 2007 Bone geometry, density, and strength indices of the distal radius reflect loading via childhood gymnastic activity. J Clin Densitom 10(1):65e75. 32. Ducher G, Daly RM, Bass SL. 2009 Effects of repetitive loading on bone mass and geometry in young male tennis players: a quantitative study using MRI. J Bone Miner Res 24(10): 1686e1692.

Zribi et al. 33. Yang PF, Br€ uggemann GP, Rittweger J. 2011 What do we currently know from in vivo bone strain measurements in humans? J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 11(1):8e20. 34. Vicente-Rodriguez G, Ara I, Perez-Gomez J, et al. 2004 High femoral bone mineral density accretion in prepubertal soccer players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36(10):1789e1795. 35. Vicente-Rodriguez G, Dorado C, Perez-Gomez J, et al. 2004 Enhanced bone mass and physical fitness in young female handball players. Bone 35(5):1208e1215. 36. Vicente-Rodriguez G. 2006 How does exercise affect bone development during growth? Sports Med 36(7):561e569. 37. Courteix D, Lespessailles E, Obert P, Benhamou CL. 1999 Skull bone mass deficit in prepubertal highly-trained gymnast girls. Int J Sports Med 20(5):328e333. 38. Vico L, Collet P, Guignandon A, et al. 2000 Effects of long-term microgravity exposure on cancellous and cortical weight bearing bones of cosmonauts. Lancet 355(9215):1607e1611.

Journal of Clinical Densitometry: Assessment & Management of Musculoskeletal Health

Volume 17, 2014

Enhanced bone mass and physical fitness in prepubescent basketball players.

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of basketball practice on bone acquisition in the prepubertal age. In total, 48 prepubescent male bask...
240KB Sizes 1 Downloads 0 Views