Original Article
Rezapoor P, Shahriari M, Sanei H, Moeini M
Effects of Collaboration Care Model on the Quality of Life in Patients after Coronary Angioplasty: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Parastoo Rezapoor1, MS; Mohsen Shahriari2, PhD; Hamid Sanei3, MD; Mahin Moeini4, MS Department of Adult Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran; 2 Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran; 3 Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran; 4 Wound Repair Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran 1
Corresponding author: Mohsen Shahriari, PhD; Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezarjrb Ave., P. O. Box: 81746-73461, Isfahan, Iran Tel: +98 31 37927516; Fax: +98 31 36699398; Email: [email protected] Received: 28 January 2016
Revised: 16 February 2016 Accepted: 3 August 2016
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery diseases and therapies such as coronary angioplasty would lead to changes in the quality of life in patients. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of collaborative care model on the quality of life in patients after coronary angioplasty. Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in Isfahan, Iran during 2015. In this study, 50 samples were selected by simple sampling and randomly allocated into two equal groups of intervention and control. Collaborative care model was performed in the intervention group for 3 months. Data were collected using quality of life (SF-36) questionnaire which includes 36 questions on physical and psychological dimensions and was completed before and one month after the intervention in both groups. Data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics and by independent t- test, paired t test, Chi square and Mann-Whitney tests through SPSS 18. Results: After the intervention, the mean score of quality of life in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group (P
Rezapoor P, Shahriari M, Sanei H, Moeini M
Effects of Collaboration Care Model on the Quality of Life in Patients after Coronary Angioplasty: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Parastoo Rezapoor1, MS; Mohsen Shahriari2, PhD; Hamid Sanei3, MD; Mahin Moeini4, MS Department of Adult Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran; 2 Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran; 3 Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran; 4 Wound Repair Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran 1
Corresponding author: Mohsen Shahriari, PhD; Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezarjrb Ave., P. O. Box: 81746-73461, Isfahan, Iran Tel: +98 31 37927516; Fax: +98 31 36699398; Email: [email protected] Received: 28 January 2016
Revised: 16 February 2016 Accepted: 3 August 2016
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery diseases and therapies such as coronary angioplasty would lead to changes in the quality of life in patients. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of collaborative care model on the quality of life in patients after coronary angioplasty. Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in Isfahan, Iran during 2015. In this study, 50 samples were selected by simple sampling and randomly allocated into two equal groups of intervention and control. Collaborative care model was performed in the intervention group for 3 months. Data were collected using quality of life (SF-36) questionnaire which includes 36 questions on physical and psychological dimensions and was completed before and one month after the intervention in both groups. Data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics and by independent t- test, paired t test, Chi square and Mann-Whitney tests through SPSS 18. Results: After the intervention, the mean score of quality of life in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group (P
