LEUERS

little

relation

to

socioeconomic

class,

tends

to

be

a child

and

poverty

of content

of speech

and

TO THE

in seven

EDITOR

other

entries.

unwanted by either parent; frequently this is the only child of an unmarried mother who rejects both hen pregnancy and her child (3). Another type of unsocialized offender, the unsocialized

The negative religious exception of a single tions mean

no other particular area of human experience. Does this that religion is a sign of mental disorder? After a thor-

runaway,

ough

literature

was

described

in 1967

(5). This

type,

as well

as the

other two, was found in a population of 300 delinquent boys committed to the New York State Training School for Boys. Group or cooperative delinquents were defined by catalogued behaviors, and unsocialized aggressive delinquents and unsocialized runaway delinquents were similarly defined. These three groups appeared in DSM-II as group delinquent reaction of childhood (or adolescence), unsocialized aggressive

reaction

away reaction These three ground factors. ing

parental

groups quents. much quents

of childhood

(or

adolescence),

and

of childhood (on adolescence). behavioral categories differ in family Clearly, parental rejection and factors rejection

differentiate

both

of the

run-

backfavor-

unsocialized

from the cooperative or group type (socialized) delinUnsocialized runaway delinquents have experienced more rejection than unsocialized aggressive delin(5), who are able to react with anger and aggressive-

ness.

Unsocialized

to be aggressive. sive diagnosis, pictures.

The

conduct

chapter

with

risk

runaways

lack

DSM-III

for

to embrace

disorder

conduct

are

at greater

risk

for

and

self-belief

an inclu-

all three

clinical

in the monograph

disorder.

tend to occur in large families; tends to be an only child. The families

courage

an abstraction,

disorder,

on conduct

factors

the

created

Group

the unsocialized chapter indicates conduct

disorder,

deals

delinquents

delinquent that large which

sim-

ply indicates that the group or socialized type of conduct disorder is more frequent than the unsocialized types. In this chapter an abstraction, conduct disorder, is homogenized. This

treatment

of conduct

disorder

resembles

taking

an apple,

a prickly pear, and a lemon, homogenizing them, and then inquiring about what kind of tree would bean such a fruit. It is my earnest hope that DSM-IV will make it possible to recognize and distinguish apples, prickly pears, and lemons.

REFERENCES

1. Shaffer D, Philips I, Enzer NB (eds): Prevention of Mental Disorders, Alcohol and Other Drug Use in Children and Adolescents: OSAP Prevention Monograph 2. Rockville, Md, Office for Substance Abuse Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, 1989 2. Jenkins RL, Hewitt L: Types of personality structure encountered in child guidance clinics. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1944; 14:84-94 3. Hewitt LE, Jenkins RL: Fundamental Patterns of Maladjustment: The Dynamics of Their Origin. State of Illinois, 1946 4. Jenkins RL: Psychiatric syndromes in children and their relation to family background. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1966; 36:450457 5. Jenkins RL, Boyer A: Types of delinquent behavior and background factors. Int J Soc Psychiatry 1967; 14:65-76 RICHARD

DSM-HI-R

and

L. JENKINS, M.D. Iowa City, Iowa

Religion

examples reference

search,

stand out because, with the to politics, the glossary men-

I am not

aware

of proof

that

in the

religious context there is an unusually high incidence of mental illness. Negative religious bias in DSM-III-R is present in the entry “Magical Thinking,” quoted here in part: “The person believes that his or her thoughts, words, or actions might, or will in some manner, cause or prevent a specific outcome in some .

.

.

.

way that defies Magical thinking

the normal laws is seen in children,

itive cultures,

and in Schizotypal

phrenia,

Obsessive

and

is placed tendency

termed possibility

of cause and effect in people in prim-

Personality

Compulsive

Disorder,

Disorder.”

in the context of magical thinking, toward fantasy in violation of the “reality principle.” No mention

of sane

prayer,

so prayer

Here,

Schizoprayer

which implies a what might be is made of the

generally

appears

sus-

pect. Prayful people are linked with children and primitive cultures. This ridicule applies to 90% of the American public (1). Such insensitivity can only widen the unfortunate gap between psychiatry and its surrounding culture. Another entry in the glossary, “Poverty of Content of Speech,” is also insensitive to religious persons: “Speech that is adequate in amount but conveys little information because of vagueness, empty repetitions, or use of stereotyped or obscure phrases . . . . Example: Interviewer: ‘O.K. Why is it, do you think, that people believe in God?’ Patient: ‘Well, first of all because, He is the person that, is their personal sayion . . . . Myself, I am pointed in the ways of uh, knowing night from wrong, and doing it. I can’t do any more, on not less than that.’ “ This example is the only one offered, and it

is specific

to religion.

It implies

for those

who

do not know

better that a religious wonldview is typically accepted by persons incapable of clear thought and speech. But these passages do not indicate poverty of content of speech. They can easily be translated into a dialect that the interviewer could understand. The patient responds roughly as follows: “People believe in God because they feel that God is their personal savior . . . . Myself, I go with God, and with a clear desire to do the right rather than the wrong. I can do nothing more, but surely nothing less.” The interviewer here shows no rapport with the inner-city believer who finds hope in Bible and hymn. Could one expect an empathic relationship

with

the

patient

Few psychiatrists

under

such

are trained

circumstances?

to understand

religion,

much

less treat it sympathetically. One wonders how academics would feel if negative examples were borrowed exclusively from their sphere? Fortunately, psychiatry does not view neligious phenomena only through the prism of DSM-III-R (2).

REFERENCES 1. Gallup G: Gallup Opinion Index: Religion in America. Princeton, NJ, American Institute of Public Opinion, 1981 2. Knoll J, Sheehan W: Religious beliefs and practices among 52 psychiatric inpatients in Minnesota. Am J Psychiatry 1989; 146:67-72

SIR:

negative catatonic

Am

J

In

DSM-III-R “Glossary of Technical Terms,” religious examples are presented in the entries for posturing, delusion, incoherence, magical thinking, the

Psychiatry

147:6,

June

1990

STEPHEN

GARRARD

POST, Cleveland,

PH.D. Ohio

813

DSM-III-R and religion.

LEUERS little relation to socioeconomic class, tends to be a child and poverty of content of speech and TO THE in seven EDITOR other...
221KB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views