Serum Antibody Prevalence of Parainfluenza 3 Virus in a Free-ranging Bison (Bison bison) Herd from Alaska Author(s): Randall L. Zarnke and G. A. Erickson Source: Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 26(3):416-419. Published By: Wildlife Disease Association DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-26.3.416 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.7589/0090-3558-26.3.416
BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder.
BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research.
Journal
Serum
Antibody
Free-ranging
Prevalence Bison
bison)
Randall L. Zarnke’ and G. A. Erickson,2 Alaska 99701; 2 National Veterinary Services Ames,
Iowa
50010,
ABSTRACT:
Delta
to
bison
herd Key enza
in
serologic
a transplant (USA)
to
1984.
exposure
source
the
bison,
Blood
parainflu-
animals
from
Sheep do
not
cleared
and routinely
domestic historic
and
goats
are
come
less into
livestock. bison range
developed
purposes. During bison have been
August attracted
areas by maturing indirect interaction
grain with
for and to
may Dall
occasionally sheep (Ovis
were
for evidence
nu-
direct
collected
from
43 Delta
herd
Specisheep Blood hr at
of exposure
to parainfluenza
sera were conducted at the same facility using the serum neutralization procedure (Thorsen
agricultural
and Henderson,
1971).
Bison
sera
also were periodically tested for evidence of exposure to (1) infectious bovine rhino-
September agricultural
into and
hunters from anishot or by personnel
3 virus (P13) were performed according to the method of Thorsen and Henderson (1971). Confirmatory P13 tests on 78 bison
tracheitis, bovine viral diarrhea, and respiratory syncytial virus by the serum neutralization test (Thorsen and Henderson, 1971); (2) epizootic hemorrhagic disease and bluetongue viruses by the immunodiffusion test (Pearson and Jochim, 1979);
crops. Direct and livestock may oc-
come dabbi)
by had
ambient or refrigerated temperatures and then centrifuged. Sera were collected and frozen. Hemagglutination inhibition tests (HI)
cur
Bison with
at the edges of reThere is no contact bison. A serologic to determine the
and from 146#{176}00’W to 149#{176}00’W. mens were collected from 77 Dall at Sheep Creek (63#{176}20’N, 143#{176}50’W). was allowed to settle for 18 to 48
maoc-
However, has been
at such times. Moose (Abces abces) are common the home range of the Delta bison
samples
Samples
and Thomas, 1987). Cattle and swine populations in the Delta Junction area increased 2- to 3-fold between the mid-1970’s and mid-1980’s (Alaska Agricultural Statistics Service, 1988). Cattle, horses and swine all currently number in the
Bison
Road, Fairbanks, P.O. Box 844,
of Agriculture,
caribou which range from 63#{176}45’N to 64#{176}15’Nand from 146#{176}30’W to 149#{176}00’W. Thirty moose sera were collected from an area extending from 64#{176}15’N to 64#{176}45’N
Montana
During the 1970’s and early 1980’s jor expansion of agricultural industries curred near Delta Junction (Engelbrecht
contact with part of the
College
1300
of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (P.O. Box 605, Delta Junction, Alaska 99737, USA) from tranquilized bison.
(Bison bison) herd to 400 animals and 800 km2 area princi-
in 1928.
hundreds. merous.
1990, pp. 416-419 Association 1990
populations, especialpathogens in the area. from 409 Delta herd bi-
to livestock
son were collected mals which they
east of the community of Alaska (USA, 64#{176}00’N, herd was established by
of 23
of wildlife
ly bison,
clinical in this bison infection. HO
survey.
Delta bison from 300 freely in an
pally south and Delta Junction, 145#{176}45’W).This
near from
the
been
Bison
Bison,
P13,
as
productivity
of
found
1977
has
establishment
3 virus,
is
Delta
increased
period
There
words:
The numbers ranges
which
hypothesized
on decrease
since
Disease
Alaska
(Rangifer tarandus) spective home ranges. with other free-ranging survey was conducted
of
free-ranging
(USA),
the
are
infection.
disease
from
‘Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Laboratories, United States Department
prevalence
the
herd
)
during
cattle
the
in
Alaska
100%
Domestic
for
antibody
virus
3
Junction,
0%
26(3),
USA
Serum
parainfluenza bison (Bison
Herd
Diseases, © Wildlife
3 Virus in a
of Parainfluenza
(Bison
of Wildlife
within herd. contact caribou
(3)
Coxiella
fixation 416
test
burnetti (Erickson
by
the
et al.,
complement 1975);
(4) Bru-
SHORT
TABLE
Serum hemagglutination from Delta Junction,
1.
bison
herd
Alaska
inhibition (USA).
antibody
prevalence
COMMUNICATIONS
of parainfluenza
3 virus
417
in
the
Delta
Sex
Year
cebba
Female 0/3
0/8
0/5
0/8
0/13(0)
1977
0/14
0/12
1978
9/18
4/12
1979
4/6
1980
1/3
1/26(4) 13/30
(43)
4/5
8/11
(73)
1/2
2/5
(40)
4/12
23/45
(51)
17/53
(32)
1981
19/33
1982
9/26
8/27
1983
14/14
30/31
44/45
(98)
1984
18/18
23/23
41/41
(100)
1985
10/11
18/18
28/29
(97)
1986
13/13
38/38
51/51
(100)
1987
22/22
20/20
42/42
(100)
1988
7/7
3/3
10/10
(100)
126/195
(%)
positive/number
154/214
test
(Thoen
and
buffered
et al.
negative with each
acidified
plate
,
bovis as-
Known
1988).
control batch of
sera sera
pos-
were tested.
inA
firmed case.
positive
results
virus
isolation
All
evidence
No
found
in
1977.
By
reached for A
nearly
the
or
‘ ‘
titer
(n
=
17),
= =
16), and
will
All others Differences
based upon for significance test (Johnson,
was attempted by hunters
and 1988 1985 (n 1988 (n
England, 1974; 1986). Samples this
to as “positive. to as “negative.”
rus isolation swabs collected 27) during during
and
exceeded
antibody prevalence bison were tested of the Chi-square
=
Parks Bohac,
are in
gender of by means 1980). Vifrom
nasal 1984 (n
lung lavage
tissue fluid
during bison lung
be
17).
Results of P13 HI tests for bison are sented in Table 1. Titers ranged from 256. Results of neutralization tests
pre8 to con-
tests
attempts
1972
ples
in every were
un-
and
of the survey
tested” (Heddleston Apparently P13
lence
in the pattern
disease Ages
to
collected prevalence
P13
was
prior
remained
to had high
sampling period. of 41 bison from
Bison Range in Montana re“antibodies against parainfluwere present in all serum sam-
in that herd the dramatic the
exposure
100%
remainder serologic
1973).
;
of HI
samples antibody
1983,
Henderson, Kingscote
1971 and
of
bison
the National vealed that enza-3 virus
referred referred
(68)
successful.
titer of 8 or greater was considered evidence of past exposure to P13 for both methods based upon standards established for other wildlife species (Thorsen and
met
280/409
(72)
tested.
the
by
(65)
et al., 1973); and (6) Mycobacterium by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent
which
(0)
0/5
spp.
itive cluded
(%)
1976
antigen test (Angus and Barton, 1984); (5) 12 serovarieties of Leptospira interrogans by the microscopic agglutination test (Cole
say
Total
1975
Total Number
Male
for many increase Delta into not
and Wessman, been enzootic
years. By in antibody
bison
following
agent were
has
herd
is typical
introduction
of
of a new
a susceptible available for
bison collected. Of pled between 1983 rologically positive
contrast, preva-
population. most of the
12 yearling bison samand 1986, 11 were sefor P13. The only calf
(6-mo-old) sampled during this time was also positive. The calf’s test result may have been due to passive transfer of maternal antibody. bison are was
However, exposed
no significant
these data suggest that to P13 early in life. There difference
in sex-specific
418
JOURNAL
OF WILDLIFE
prevalence. transmitted ratory
DISEASES,
VOL.
26, NO.
This is expected for primarily by means
an of
3, JULY
The paine,
agent respi-
aerosols.
Serum antibody prevalence other wildlife species was 0%. tibody
prevalence
in
bison
bovine rhinotracheitis bovine viral diarrhea respiratory syncytial
of P13 in Serum an-
for
virus virus virus
infectious
was one of 366, was six of 316, was 0 of 105,
epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus was two of 392, bluetongue virus was 0 of 391, Coxiebba burnetti was one of 274, Brucebba spp. was 0 of 309, Leptospira interrogans was was
14 of 306, 0 of 46. Domestic
been Delta
and
livestock
the source bison herd.
uncommon
Mycobacterium are
of P13 which Respiratory
in cattle
bovis
believed
in this
entered disease area.
blood. Federal
This Aid
ects
numbers
22-4
and
the is not
Serologic
been no signs of in the high promonitored bison
by itself pathogen 1981).
P13 is considin most wildOther patho-
mestic sheep have partially responsible horn sheep (Ovis
pathogens been
from
implicated
as being
and
related
to the
management
by Proj-
W-22-3,
W-
J.
CITED
STATISTICS
agricultural
SERvI:E.
statistics
Wineinger
(eds.).
1988,
Alaska
1988.
D. A. Brown
Department
of
Agriculture,
Palmer, Alaska, pp. 32-35. ANGUS, R. D., AND C. E. BARTON. 1984. The production and evaluation of a buffered plate anfor
use
in a presumptive
Development
of
test
Biological
for
brucellosis.
Standards
56:
349-
356.
J.
COLE,
R.
C. R.
JR.,
,
1973.
Improved
spinal
microscope
crobiology
SULZER,
AND
R.
A.
microtechnique
for
agglutination
25:
test.
PURSELL.
the
lepto-
Applied
Mi-
976-980.
C. R.
ENGELBRECHT,
W.
AND
,
Agricultural
policy
Agricultural
Administration
C.
TH0NIAS.
implementation
1987.
in and
Alaska.
Extension
26:
75-90. G.
A.,
E.
A.
1975.
GUSTAFSON.
CARBREY,
G.
AND
Generalized
A.
contagious
ec-
thyma
in a sheep
rancher:
Diagnostic
consider-
ations.
Journal
American
Veterinary
Medical
Association
607
of 166:
262-263.
Press,
North
Scituate,
Massachusetts,
pp. H.
Parainfluenza virus. In Inof wild animals, 2nd ed., J. W. Davis, L. H. Karstad, and D. 0. Trainer (eds.). The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. L.
KARSTAD,
for declines of bigcanadensis) populations
process
W-22-2,
AGRICULTURAL
Duxbury
do-
fectious
1981.
diseases
208-209. B. F.,
KINGSCOTE,
bodies
largely free of livestock diseases in the past (Zarnke, 1986). Increased movement of livestock and geographic expansion of agriculture may pose a threat to the health of wildlife populations. The potential of pathogen exchange between domestic and wildlife species should play a role in the industry
was supported Restoration
W-22-1,
In Alaska and
and many processing
K. L., AND C. WESSMAN. 1973. Vaccination of American bison Pasteurella multocida serotype 2 infection (hemorrhagic septicemia). Journal of Wildlife Diseases 9: 306-310. J0IINs0N, R. R. 1980. Elementary statistics, 3rd ed.
in the contiguous United States (Turner and Payson, 1982). Wildlife populations in Alaska have been
decision-making
research in Wildlife
ChamKarcz-
HEDDLESTON,
gens which could be transmitted from livestock to bison may not be so innocuous. situation,
D. Mensch, and/or
LITERATURE ALASKA
C. P.
W-22-5.
ERICKSON,
herd. Fortunately, ered to be a minor life species (Karstad,
riculture wildlife.
R. Larson, for collecting
tigen
available.
To date, there have disease nor any decrease ductivity in this closely
In a parallel
authors wish to thank S. DuBois, D. Johnson,
marczyk, hunters
to have
evidence indicates that cattle have been exposed to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, bovine viral diarrhea, and P13 (R. A. Dieterich, pers. comm.). Long-term, largescale serologic survey results for cattle are not
1990
agof
pronghorns 22:
J.
B., AND
survey
for
Mountain eases
511-514.
J. J.
J.
viral sheep.
E.,
Laboratory
HINES,
A serological
infections Journal
of
Rocky
of Wildlife
Dis-
107-110. AND
M.
M. JocHINI.
for the immunodiffusion ceedings of American THOEN,
1974.
ENGLAND.
selected bighorn
10:
PEARSON,
BOHAC. 1986. Antiand viral pathogens in 1983. Journal of Wildlife
C.
bacterial
in Alberta,
Diseases PARKS,
J.
AND
to bovine
Diagnosticians
C. 0., AND
1979.
Protocol
test for bluetongue. ProAssociation of Veterinary
K. J. THROLSON, R. L. MORGAN.
22:
436-471.
L.
D.
1988.
MILLER, Pathogenesis
E.
NI.
SHORT COMMUNICATiONS
of
bovis
Mycobacterium
bison.
American
49:
infection
Journal
of
in
American
desert
bighonn
Research
bates,
herds
Veterinary
fornia.
1861-1865.
J.,
TIIORSEN,
J.
AND
for antibody
(IBR),
bovine
virus
3 (P13)
influenza
life
P. HENDERSON.
to infectious
Diseases
J.
TURNER,
C.,
currence
1971.
diarrhea
(BVD)
in moose
7:
93-95.
AND
J.
B.
sera.
Z.ARNKE,
ocin the
Rosa
Fish
L.
Serologic
R.
1986.
Federal Projects W-22-5.
ment
and
Fish
and
Aid
Final Report. W-22-4, and of
canadensis
Santa
diseases
Received
for
Game
68:
survey
for
in Wildlife
Game,
$87.50
Directory: and Betty Inc. Bethesda,
Environment, John Farley. Grupenhoff Maryland. 540 pp.
tation ucation would
This
text of
is a quick
Congress,
reference
involved
cision
making.
Key
access
to
and
awards
or
rapid
of
Wildlife
legislation
1989.
Diseases,
was
diRepand
of
Congress,
to
through done
the
key
word
a commendable
plex
and
seemingly
vironmental
environmental issues
p. 419
1990,
1990
Association
legislation
easily
indices. job
of
The
It is Acmem-
the
convoluted in a very
pathways
directory
for
of
en-
Inc.,
be
information
the
6410
Maryland
Health
Rockledge
in-
the duration without adin
if it were package
as
that
congressional
change. directory
a good
source
with
as
action
on
However,
it
directory
through
a personal regarding
Environment
and
reporthow
useful
software
than purchasing further information contact:
are
unclear
upgraded
concerned
to utilize
every
contained
more
legislation.
prudent
Science
understandable
anyone
aides is
will
committees
are
processed
The
this
the
direcof the
nature
and supplied
a computer
and
vironmental
com-
are
be continually
book
tory
updates
be
of
the
their it
would as
could
and
each
appointments
However,
they
expense.
have
authors the
which
ditional
rather For
conducted
presenting
these
for
Updates
members
I recommend
committees
is
of
listed
Political
provided.
members
included
biographies of congressional staff. In general, the directory is user-friendly. presented in a logical and readable manner. cess to information pertaining to specific environmental
days
edly
are
or
26(3),
Disease
Furthermore, transient
positions.
presented
educa-
Also
90
term
over
The
status,
recognition.
short
involved
contain family
presented.
formative
of each
Profiles
material
congresissues.
profiles
history,
honorary
de-
members
specific
Senator.
and
allow
appropriate
personal
occupational
mem-
environmental indices
their
concerning
provides or
resentative
in
on
committees
to
committees,
word
information
legislation
rectory
guide
congressional
subcommittees
bers
pp.
69
of their interests, or backgrounds and edin environmental issues. Additionally, it be helpful if the voting on recent envi-
ronmental
U.S.
tion,
Alaska,
25 April
members of Congress. tory is limited by the
in
W-22-3, Depart-
REVIEW...
Congressional T. Grupenhoff Publications,
sional
microbial
Restoration,
Juneau,
© Wildlife
bers
Cali235-243.
W-22-l, W-22-2, Job 18.5. Alaska
publication
Journal
BOOK
cremno-
Mountains,
The
1982.
infectious
para-
of Wild-
Ovis
the
California
pathogens.
and
Journal
P.AYSON.
of selected
Survey
rhinotracheitis
bovine
sheep, of
419
en-
may
copy. the
direc-
Communications
Communications Drive,
Suite
be
a library
%
Group, 203,
Bethesda,
20817.
format.
this reference is of undeniable utilsome shortcomings. The biographies of congressional members and staffers are insufficient to derive any meaningful interpreity
Although there
are
Brad T. Marden, NSI Technologies, Inc., USEPA Envi’ ronmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon 97333, USA.