Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology xxx (2015) 1e11

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bpobgyn

16

Cerebrovascular emergencies in pregnancy Scott A. Shainker, DO, MS, Clinical Instructor in Obstetrics a, Jonathan A. Edlow, MD, Professor b, Karen O'Brien, MD, Instructor in Obstetrics c, * a

Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Clinical Fellow, Division of MaternaleFetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA b Medicine Harvard Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115, USA c Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Division of MaternaleFetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA

Keywords: pregnancy neurological diseases eclampsia preeclampsia stroke migraine

Caring for pregnant and postpartum patients with neurological disease carries specific challenges. In performing a diagnosis, it is often difficult to differentiate between true pathology and neurological symptoms resulting from normal pregnancy physiology. Treating the pregnant patient can be problematic as well. Providers need to be aware of the possible untoward effects of maternal treatments on the developing fetus, but not withhold therapies that reduce disease-related morbidity and mortality. Given the complexities of conducting trials during pregnancy, few treatments are based on high-quality data; observational data and clinical expert opinion often guide treatments. With the exception of preeclampsia/eclampsia, neurological diseases typically do not warrant early delivery in the absence of fetal distress. Multidisciplinary care, utilizing the expertise of anesthesiology, critical care medicine, emergency medicine, maternalefetal medicine, neurology, and radiology, is essential in ensuring prompt diagnosis and treatment. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ1 617 667 4836. E-mail address: [email protected] (K. O'Brien). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.03.004 1521-6934/© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Please cite this article in press as: Shainker SA, et al., Cerebrovascular emergencies in pregnancy, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.bpobgyn.2015.03.004

2

S.A. Shainker et al. / Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology xxx (2015) 1e11

Introduction Neurological symptoms in pregnant women are common. Practitioners must differentiate pathological etiologies from preexisting or pregnancy-specific neurological conditions. Unique pathophysiological changes of pregnancy can increase the risk for neurological complications. For example, estrogen-stimulated production of clotting factors increases the risk of thrombosis, especially postpartum [1]. Furthermore, venous compliance, capillary leakage, and vasogenic edema rise along with progesterone levels [2]. Patients presenting with acute neurological complaints warrant immediate attention, as timely intervention can be lifesaving for both mother and fetus. Eclampsia, for instance, carries maternal mortality rates of 0.5e14%, with the lowest rates in patients who receive regular prenatal care [3,4]. Physicians caring for gravid patients must understand how treatment differs from the treatment of non-gravid patients. Additionally, practitioners must be mindful when selecting medications and interventions that the fetus is exposed to minimal risk, while not compromising on maternal treatment. Applying expertise from multiple disciplines e anesthesiology, critical care medicine, emergency medicine, maternalefetal medicine, neurology, and radiology e is key in achieving prompt and accurate diagnosis, and in initiating treatment. When coordinating care, gestational age, fetal viability, and mode of delivery need to be considered. Planning for a safe delivery often adds another layer of clinical complexity, as providers consider the mode of delivery (cesarean section, unassisted vaginal delivery, or vaginal delivery assisted with a vacuum or forceps), anesthetic options, hemodynamic changes specific to the trimesters of pregnancy and parturition, and hemostasis. In this review, we focus our attention on neurological complications during and just after pregnancy, including preeclampsia/eclampsia, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVT). The authors recognize that there are many neurological diseases that can be encountered in the gravid population; however, this section focuses on the neurological emergencies that carry the most significant morbidity and mortality. Preeclampsia/eclampsia Preeclampsia is unique to pregnancy and the puerperium. It is characterized by new-onset hypertension (>140/90 mm Hg on two occasions at least 4 h apart) and proteinuria exceeding 300 mg in 24 h, developing after 20 weeks of gestation. Preeclampsia is often heralded by headache, peripheral edema, restlessness, and hyper-reflexia. Preeclampsia progresses to eclampsia in approximately 0.5% of pregnancies. In eclampsia, patients have the same findings as in preeclampsia, with the addition of generalized toniceclonic seizures. Simultaneous goals of treatment include blood pressure control, prevention of cerebral edema, hemorrhage, infarction, and edema and seizure prevention. Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome and PRES are additional complications often seen with preeclampsia/eclampsia, and both necessitate delivery [3e8]. Magnesium sulfate infusion, given to preeclamptic patients with severe features, reduces seizure risk by >50% [3,9e13]. Refer to the “Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy” chapter for details on the management of preeclampsia, dosage of magnesium sulfate, and treatment of hypertension. Despite magnesium treatment, seizures may persist in 10% of patients [3]. Although the use of magnesium sulfate in preeclamptic patients with severe features is well established, its use in cases of mild preeclampsia is less compelling. Severe features of preeclampsia include systolic blood pressures of 160 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressures of 110 mm Hg, thrombocytopenia, impaired liver function, renal insufficiency, pulmonary edema, and new-onset cerebral or visual disturbances. Two double-blinded, randomized controlled trials evaluated magnesium treatment in patients with mild preeclampsia. Neither showed any significant reduction in eclampsia or progression to severe disease [11,14]. In a trial that randomized >10,000 preeclamptic women to receive magnesium sulfate or placebo, the number needed to treat to prevent one seizure in patients with mild disease was 109, compared to 63 patients with severe features [9]. Currently, there is insufficient data to recommend magnesium sulfate use in patients without severe features of Please cite this article in press as: Shainker SA, et al., Cerebrovascular emergencies in pregnancy, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.bpobgyn.2015.03.004

S.A. Shainker et al. / Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology xxx (2015) 1e11

3

preeclampsia [8]. Although the use of magnesium sulfate in antepartum and immediately postpartum preeclamptic patients with severe features is well established, the use of magnesium is not as well established for patients presenting after the immediate postpartum period with features consistent with preeclampsia. Nevertheless, many experts recommend magnesium for seizure prophylaxis for postpartum patients presenting with elevated blood pressure and neurological symptoms such as headache or visual disturbances [15]. Eclampsia is one of the few true obstetrical emergencies. A patient who presents with convulsive seizures near term should be considered eclamptic until proven otherwise. Up to 16% of patients with eclampsia are normotensive, but this subset of patients should be managed in the same fashion as their hypertensive counterparts [3,18]. Brain imaging via noncontract computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended to rule out intracranial pathology for patients with atypical presentations, for instance, gravid patients with seizures and no clear signs of preeclampsia, persistent focal neurological deficits, and no history of epilepsy [17]. Once seizures and hypertension have been stabilized, delivery should be expedited, regardless of gestational age. After all, the definitive treatment for eclampsia is delivery, although not necessarily by cesarean section. The fetal heart rate tracing is often non-reassuring during the seizure and immediately after during the recovery phase. However, the fetus status typically recovers in parallel with maternal stabilization. Most physicians delay delivery until the patient is oriented, seizure activity has ceased, and the fetal heart rate has become reassuring. Ultimately, providers need to take into account gestational age, cervical status, maternal status, fetal presentation, and pregnancy history when making recommendations regarding mode of delivery [3,8,16]. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome RCVS, sometimes referred to as postpartum angiopathy when presenting postpartum, carries significant morbidity and mortality [17e21]. Given its rarity, the exact incidence is unknown; however, the syndrome is more commonly seen in patients with preeclampsia and autoimmune disorders [20]. Hallmarks of this syndrome are sudden onset of a severe thunderclap headache (often multiple thunderclap headaches) and segmental vasoconstriction of cerebral arteries documented on brain imaging. Approximately two-thirds of peripartum cases occur post-delivery [20,22,23]. RCVS can mimic eclampsia, as seizures are found in up to 28% of patients. RCVS has also been reported in patients with preexisting preeclampsia [20,24]. Although the exact pathophysiological process resulting in RCVS is unknown, vasoactive agents, postpartum state, and physical and sexual activity have been implicated as inciting factors [22,25]. The mainstay in diagnosis is MRI or CT angiography, which can be normal in the first days of the process [27]. Transcranial Doppler can be used to follow the course of the disease [26]. To date, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment of RVCS. Treatment is guided by case series, and it is limited to retrospective and observational data, as there are no randomized prospective clinical trials. Symptomatic relief and eliminating precipitating factors are the first steps in treatment [22,27]. Calcium channel blockers are often used to treat RCVS with good effect [19,28e30]. Contrary to historical belief, most authorities now recommend against the use of steroids in patients with RCVS [19,22]. In severe cases, including those with new-onset neurological deficit or worsening imaging findings, aggressive interventions are often employed. The internal carotid artery infusion of milrinone, verapamil, or nimodipine has been reported with varying degrees of success [18,20,31e33]. Balloon angioplasty has also been used in treating severe cases, but carries significant risk [20,31,34]. The use of intravenous prostacyclins has been reported, but has not been validated, in the pregnant population [35]. It is our practice to initiate treatment with a calcium channel blocker, and to hydrate intravenously to counteract the hypotensive property of the calcium channel blocker. We emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary care, utilizing the expertise of our critical care, neurology, and maternalefetal medicine colleagues to ensure proper care. Simple treatment, including maintaining hypertension, hypervolemia, and hemodilution (triple-H), with and without oral nimodipine, has been used successfully postpartum. In one report, hypervolemia was achieved by infusing 5% dextrose in normal saline at 400 cc/h in combination with 12.5 g albumin every 6 h. This regimen resolved the severe headache, and the treatment was weaned over the Please cite this article in press as: Shainker SA, et al., Cerebrovascular emergencies in pregnancy, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.bpobgyn.2015.03.004

4

S.A. Shainker et al. / Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology xxx (2015) 1e11

ensuring days. As severe hypertension can result from hypervolemia, this approach is probably best avoided in pregnant patients [23,25]. RCVS is a rare disorder, with many symptoms overlapping with other disease processes. The exact pathophysiology remains unknown, and at this point, there is no clear consensus on the treatment. The goal of the treatment is to relieve cerebral vasoconstriction in hopes of mitigating potential neurological sequelae, and this should be accomplished in a tertiary, multidisciplinary care setting. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome Preeclampsia, eclampsia, severe hypertension, and RCVS can all be complicated by PRES. A clinical diagnosis of PRES includes the presence of headaches, seizures, encephalopathy, and visual disturbances, as well as radiological findings of focal reversible vasogenic edema. The edema is best seen on MRI of the brain, most commonly involving the parietaleoccipital lobes, followed by the frontal and temporal lobes, and least commonly affecting the cerebellum [36]. Symptoms develop without prodrome, and progress over 12e48 h [28]. Visual symptoms often resolve in hours to days, but edema often lags behind clinical symptoms. In fact, one of the distinctive characteristics of PRES is the reversibility of the clinical and radiological abnormalities after appropriate treatment of precipitating factors [37]. Recommendations regarding the treatment of PRES are limited, not only because of the various etiologies leading to this diagnosis but mainly because of the lack of well-designed clinical trials. Although PRES is reversible when treatment is instituted, delayed diagnosis and treatment can result in chronic neurological sequelae. A 2005 study followed eight patients diagnosed over 4 years with PRES at one institution. Of the eight patients, five had hypertensive encephalopathy during pregnancy, two had eclampsia during the postpartum period, and one patient with chronic renal failure developed symptoms after immunosuppressive treatment. In all but one patient, neurological and radiological abnormalities resolved after appropriate treatment [38]. Potential inciting factors should be recognized and treated. If medications or cytotoxic immunosuppressive therapy is thought to be causative, the dosage should be decreased or stopped. As hypertension does occur in most patients with PRES, blood pressure should be lowered, often resulting in concomitant clinical improvement. Seizures are usually treated with phenytoin and other antiepileptic medications, unless the patient has eclampsia e in which case, magnesium sulfate is recommended. As symptoms and imaging studies improve, antiepileptic medications can be tapered, as patients do not appear to be at risk for a chronic seizure disorder. Lastly, as electrolyte disturbances, fluid overload, uremia, and sepsis may contribute to the development of PRES, these too should be treated [6,39]. Stroke Cerebral vascular accidents are uncommon in pregnancy, occurring in 10.7 per 100,000 deliveries, but account for >12% of all maternal deaths. During pregnancy, the rate of stroke appears to increase, with reported incidence ranging from four to 34 per 100,000. The majority of strokes occur within 3 days of delivery in the postpartum period [40]. Risk factors for ischemic stroke include preeclampsia, eclampsia, chronic hypertension, migraines, cesarean delivery, sickle cell disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, thrombocytopenia, drug use (especially cocaine), African-American race, older age, greater parity, and multiple gestation [41]. It is critical when a stroke occurs to establish as quickly as possible whether it is ischemic or hemorrhagic. Brain imaging with MRI or CT should be done as soon as possible. MRI is the preferred imaging modality in pregnancy, with potentially better sensitivity at identifying small infarcts, but CT is often the first imaging study done as it is more readily obtainable. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI contrast should be avoided unless absolutely necessary because of the lack of data regarding safety to the fetus. Acute ischemic stroke The initial management of pregnant patients with stroke does not differ from that of nonpregnant patients. After confirming adequate oxygenation, circulatory integrity, and achieving euglycemia, goals Please cite this article in press as: Shainker SA, et al., Cerebrovascular emergencies in pregnancy, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.bpobgyn.2015.03.004

S.A. Shainker et al. / Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology xxx (2015) 1e11

5

of therapy include defining the underlying vascular lesion, reperfusion, and preventing recurrence [42,43]. Avoiding hypotension and marked hypertension is important to preserve cerebral perfusion pressure. The mainstays of treatment include thrombolytic agents, antiplatelet agents, and anticoagulation [42]. Testing for various causes of thrombophilia is recommended to help determine potential underlying etiologies. Echocardiography and some form of cerebrovascular imaging are modalities that can help determine the underlying risk factors and etiology if initial workup is unrevealing. Thrombolytic therapy In the nonpregnant patient, thrombolytic therapy within the first 4.5 h of symptom onset is the most effective intervention for salvaging ischemic brain tissue [42]. Only recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is approved for use in acute stroke in the nonpregnant patient [44]. There are reports of >200 pregnant woman who have received thrombolytic therapy for various indications including myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolus, superior vena cava syndrome, and ischemic stroke [45e48]. A 2006 report reviewed eight pregnant patients with ischemic stroke treated with thrombolytic therapy. Seven patients made a good recovery. One patient died from arterial dissection resulting from a complication of angiography. Three patients had miscarriages, three terminated the pregnancies, and there were deliveries of two healthy newborns [49]. tPA is FDA category C. It does not cross the placenta, and animal studies have not indicated a risk of teratogenicity [50]. Gravid or not, complications of thrombolytic therapy include ICH, systemic bleeding, and angioedema. Thrombolytic treatment in pregnancy may result in maternal hemorrhage, which could lead to preterm labor, placental abruption, fetal demise, or intra-partum hemorrhage. These risks need to be weighed against the benefits of thrombolytic therapy in reducing maternal mortality; however, about half of patients who survive pregnancy-related stroke retain residual neurological deficits [51]. The 2013 AHA stroke treatment guidelines still list pregnancy as an exclusion criterion. Therefore, treating a pregnant woman having a stroke with tPA requires a very careful discussion with the patient and family about risks and benefits, and it should involve the expertise of a stroke specialist [42]. When tPA is given, aspirin therapy (81 mg daily) for secondary stroke prevention should not be started until 24 h after the initial event [52]. In nonpregnant patients with ischemic stroke, aspirin initiated within 48 h improves long-term outcomes, and it reduces the risk of recurrent ischemia without the risk of major hemorrhagic complications [53]. If possible, aspirin should be stopped 7e10 days before delivery, as a slight increase in postoperative bleeding has been reported in some studies in patients who continued aspirin until the day of surgery [54]. Anticoagulation is not recommended in acute treatment of thrombotic stroke, and it should be delayed if feasible for 7e10 days to avoid ICH complications. In a patient with a preexisting indication for anticoagulation, most physicians will continue anticoagulation throughout pregnancy and for at least 6e8 weeks postpartum. The 2012 American College of Chest Physician guidelines recommend anticoagulation therapy for at least 6 weeks postpartum, and for a minimum total duration of 3 months, for pregnant women with acute venous thromboembolism [55]. The 2014 American Heart Association guidelines recommend that patients with ischemic stroke and an inherited thrombophilia be evaluated for deep vein thrombosis, which is an indication for potentially both short-term and longterm anticoagulation [56]. The prolonged postpartum anticoagulation course is recommended given the increased risk of venous thromboembolism in the postpartum state [1]. Pregnancy-specific considerations with ischemic stroke If ischemic stroke occurs in pregnancy, treatment should be directed at protecting brain tissue, preventing complications, and controlling modifiable factors that worsen prognosis. Before 24 weeks, pregnancy termination can be considered, but it is unclear whether termination improves the overall maternal outcome. If maternal and fetal statuses are stable, patients should be expectantly managed until delivery can be planned later on in the pregnancy, preferably as close to a 39-week gestation as possible. Please cite this article in press as: Shainker SA, et al., Cerebrovascular emergencies in pregnancy, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.bpobgyn.2015.03.004

6

S.A. Shainker et al. / Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology xxx (2015) 1e11

Recurrence of stroke Patients who have had a stroke in a prior pregnancy often present for preconception counseling. There is sparse data to guide counseling, mainly in the form of case series and expert opinion. Case series suggest an overall low recurrence rate of 1 in 143, or 0.7%, especially if the causative vascular lesion has been treated [57e59]. A recurrent stroke is more likely to occur during the postpartum period than during the antepartum period [59]. In patients with an ongoing thrombophilia (e.g., Factor V Leiden), the risk of recurrence is higher, approaching 20% [57]. Underlying medical disorders including diabetes, hypertension, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes need to be addressed and optimized. For stroke recurrence prevention in pregnancy, American Heart Association recommendations are based on two scenarios: either a high-risk condition (i.e., mechanical heart valves) requiring anticoagulation outside of pregnancy or a lower-risk situation in which antiplatelet therapy would be the treatment recommendation outside of pregnancy [56]. Except for cardioembolic stroke, the effectiveness of heparin in preventing recurrent stroke has not been studied. Therefore, low-dose aspirin, unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), or no treatment could be acceptable in subsequent pregnancy. As there are little data regarding the riskebenefit ratio of secondary prevention of non-cardioembolic stroke in the first trimester, the American Academy of Neurology has no consensus on this issue. Approximate percent recommendations in a 2009 American Academy of Neurology survey were 40% for aspirin 81 mg, 25% no treatment, and 10% unfractionated weight heparin or LMWH [60]. Intracranial hemorrhage ICH is uncommon in pregnancy, with an incidence of five per 10,000, but when it occurs, mortality rates are as high as 40% [61]. The relative risk of ICH during pregnancy and 5 weeks postpartum is 5.6 times higher than in nonpregnant women [62]. Fourteen to 55% of hemorrhagic strokes in pregnancy result from severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, or HELLP [63]. Most often, however, pregnancy-related subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and ICH are caused by aneurysmal rupture or bleeding from a vascular malformation [64]. Management involves airway evaluation and possible intubation, clot stabilization, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, blood pressure reduction, cerebral edema management, control of temperature and seizures, and definitive treatment of the aneurysm if one is found [65]. Cerebral aneurysms Despite gestational vasodilation, plasma volume expansion, and increased hypertension, pregnancy does not appear to increase the risk of cerebral aneurysm rupture [66,67]. Typical presentation is with a thunderclap headache, vomiting, seizures, or reduced consciousness. Aneurysmal SAH is most common in the third trimester, and up to 6 weeks postpartum. This propensity for a rupture is likely due to increased vascular stress from expanded circulating blood volume and increased cardiac output. Moreover, hormonally driven hyperplasia of the intimal smooth muscle wall, with loss of elasticity, increases vulnerability to aneurysmal rupture [64,68,69]. Unruptured, asymptomatic, stable aneurysms typically do not require intervention during pregnancy. If aneurysmal SAH occurs during pregnancy, treatment with endovascular coiling or neurosurgical clipping improves maternal and fetal outcomes [70e73]. Once an aneurysm has been treated, the pregnancy can typically proceed to term. Arteriovenous malformations The prevalence of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in the general population has been reported to be 18 per 100,000 [74]. In a recent review of 58,429 deliveries, ischemic strokes developed in 21 patients, 11 had hemorrhagic strokes, and four had sinus thrombosis. Within the 11 hemorrhagic strokes, four were definitively attributed to AVM rupture [75]. Although rare, ICH during pregnancy is not uncommonly attributed to AVM rupture. Evidence regarding the risk of AVM rupture in pregnancy Please cite this article in press as: Shainker SA, et al., Cerebrovascular emergencies in pregnancy, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.bpobgyn.2015.03.004

S.A. Shainker et al. / Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology xxx (2015) 1e11

7

is controversial. A retrospective study in 1990 indicated a 3.5% risk of hemorrhage during pregnancy, similar to age-matched, nonpregnant women [76]. A 2014 review also found an annual hemorrhage rate of 3.11% [77]. However, several case series and case reports have demonstrated a trend toward greater rates of hemorrhage from AVMs during a woman's reproductive years. A 2012 retrospective review described an 8.1% AVM rupture rate during pregnancy compared with the overall annual hemorrhage rate of 4.8% [78]. Another 1993 review reported a 9.3% rate of hemorrhage during pregnancy compared with 4.5% during the remainder of childbearing years [79]. Overall, there is no clear evidence to recommend women with unruptured AVMs to avoid pregnancy [80]. The same hemodynamic and endocrine changes of pregnancy that contribute to aneurysmal rupture likely also contribute to AVM hemorrhage. Treatment and intervention is the same as in nonpregnant women. In a review of 154 cases of spontaneous ICH during pregnancy, 23% were attributable to AVM rupture. Of 22 women who were observed with ruptured AVMs, there was a 32% maternal mortality rate and a 23% fetal mortality rate. The maternal mortality rate was 23% in cases where women required surgical intervention, and there were no reports of fetal death [64]. Microsurgical excision is the standard for treating symptomatic AVM, often with presurgical embolization, but endovascular embolization with coiling should also be considered [80]. Untreated vascular malformations are prone to re-bleeding. In one study, the annual rate of recurrent hemorrhage in women with an AVM was roughly 31% in the first year following an initial hemorrhage, and 6% in subsequent years. If possible, AVMs that have previously bled should be treated before a subsequent pregnancy [81]. Delivery following ICH If the cerebral aneurysm or AVM has been definitively treated (e.g., clipped or coiled), and the cause of the cerebral hemorrhage has been treated, most sources indicate that patients may undergo labor and a vaginal delivery [82]. Vaginal delivery has not been reported to be associated with an increased risk of maternal bleeding complications. One recent study observed a 1.4% risk of ruptured aneurysm with pregnancy and 0.05% with delivery, comparable to that of the general population [76,79]. Vaginal delivery is not advised in the case of a ruptured, unsecured aneurysm, neurosurgery performed within a week of delivery, or incompletely treated AVM. Options then include a cesarean section or an assisted second stage of labor with forceps or a vacuum extractor, with the goal to avoid increased strain with valsalva [83,84]. Whether delivery is planned via a cesarean section or an assisted vaginal delivery, controlling modifiable risk factors during labor and delivery, such as hypertension, is strongly recommended. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis World statistics estimate cases of CVT to be 40e50 cases per 100,000 live births. The rate of death with CVT from all causes is 2e10%, but less when associated with pregnancy [85,86]. The occurrence of CVT has been related to the hypercoagulability of pregnancy, although an exact etiology is unknown, and likely multifactorial [85,87]. CVT has a variety of clinical presentations, depending on the site involved. Occlusion of the cerebral cortical veins can lead to focal neurological signs or seizures. Occlusion of the major venous sinuses can lead to intracranial hypertension, headache, vomiting, and papilledema. Cavernous sinus thrombosis can lead to a painful eye or exopthalmos [85,88]. Risk factors for CVT are hypertension, advanced maternal age, cesarean delivery, infections, and excessive vomiting. The treatment of CVT consists of anticoagulation, typically with UFH or LMWH [89]. 2014 American Heart Association guidelines recommend therapeutic anticoagulation throughout pregnancy, and continuing postpartum for at least 6 weeks, for a total minimum duration of 6 months. Seizures and intracranial hypertension are common, and they may also need to be treated [43,56]. Summary Expeditious diagnosis and treatment of pregnant patients with acute neurological symptoms is crucial in reducing morbidity and mortality. Neurological emergencies include those unique to Please cite this article in press as: Shainker SA, et al., Cerebrovascular emergencies in pregnancy, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.bpobgyn.2015.03.004

8

S.A. Shainker et al. / Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology xxx (2015) 1e11

pregnancy, as well as disease processes that occur in the general population. MRI and/or cerebrovascular imaging may be necessary for diagnosis when CT is non-diagnostic. Therapies are often the same as those used to treat nonpregnant patients, and they are most effective when initiated in a timely manner, as delay in treatment can lead to significant long-term neurological deficits. Immediate delivery is rarely necessary, although in cases in which delivery reduces disease severity (for instance, eclampsia), delivery is recommended after maternal stabilization. Efficient multidisciplinary management, coordinating recommendations from specialists in neurology, critical care, neurosurgery, obstetrics, emergency medicine, anesthesiology, radiology, and neonatology, is necessary. Large randomized controlled trials investigating treatment options during pregnancy are greatly needed. Until there is more data specifically pertaining to the treatment of neurological emergencies in pregnancy, many interventions will be based on observational case reports or conclusions drawn from studies in the general population.

Practice points  During pregnancy, providers need to be aware of the effects of therapies and interventions on the developing fetus.  An early delivery is often not indicated if there is no evidence of fetal distress, except for severe preeclampsia or eclampsia.  Multidisciplinary care is needed when caring for pregnant patients with neurological emergencies.  Significant hypertension in pregnancy can be treated with hydralazine, labetalol, or nifedipine.  Magnesium sulfate is given to patients with severe preeclampsia or eclampsia for seizure prophylaxis.  Tissue plasminogen activator can be considered to treat acute ischemic stroke in gravid patients, followed by low-dose aspirin.

Research agenda Determine clinical application of angiogenic factors for preeclampsia Establish a registry of patients with stroke in pregnancy Ensure safety of thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke in pregnancy Determine best approach to treating aneurysms and intracranial vascular malformations in pregnant patients.

Conflict of interest None. References [1] Kamel H, Navi BB, Sriram N, et al. Risk of a thrombotic event after the 6-Week postpartum period. N Engl J Med 2014;370: 1307e15. [2] Bremme KA. Haemostatic changes in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2003;16:153e68. *[3] Sibai BM. Diagnosis, prevention, and management of eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:402e10. [4] Mattar F, Sibai BM. EclampsiaVIII. Risk factors for maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:307e12. [5] Martin JN, Rose CH, Briery CM. Understanding and managing HELLP syndrome: the integral role of aggressive glucocorticoids for mother and child. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:914e34.

Please cite this article in press as: Shainker SA, et al., Cerebrovascular emergencies in pregnancy, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.bpobgyn.2015.03.004

S.A. Shainker et al. / Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology xxx (2015) 1e11

9

[6] Hinchey J, Chaves C, Appignani B, et al. A reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. N Engl J Med 1996;334: 494e500. [7] Manfredi M, Beltramello A, Bongiovanni LG, et al. Eclamptic encephalopathy: imaging and pathogenetic considerations. Acta Neurol Scand 1997. *[8] ACOG. Executive Summary. Hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:1122e31. *[9] The Magpie Trial Collaborative Group. Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? the Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo- controlled trial. Lancet 2002;359:1877e90. *[10] Sibai BM. Magnesium sulfate prophylaxis in preeclampsia: lessons learned from recent trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:1520e6. [11] Witlin AG, Friedman SA, Sibai BM. The effect of magnesium sulfate therapy on the duration of labor in women with mild preeclampsia at term: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:623e7. [12] Coetzee E, Dommisse J, Anthony J. A randomised controlled trial of intravenous magnesium sulphate versus placebo in the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:300e3. [13] Belfort M, Anthony J, Saade G, et al. A comparison of magnesium sulfate and nimodipine for the prevention of eclampsia. N Engl J Med 2003;348:304e11. [14] Livingston J, Livingston L, Ramsey R, et al. Magnesium sulfate in women with mild preeclampsia: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:217e20. [15] Sibai BM. Etiology and management of postpartum hypertension-preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:470e5. [16] Pritchard J, Cunningham F, Pritchard S. The Parkland Memorial Hospital protocol for treatment of eclampsia: evaluation of 245 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;148:951e63. [17] Singhal A. Postpartum angiopathy with reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy. Arch Neurol 2004;61:411e6. [18] Singhal AB, Kimberly WT, Schaefer PW, et al. Case 8-2009: a 36-Year-Old woman with headache, hypertension, and seizure 2 Weeks Post partum. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1126e37. [19] Singhal AB, Hajj-Ali RA, Topcuoglo MA, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes: analysis of 139 cases. Arch Neurol 2011;68:1005e12. [20] Fugate JE, Ameriso SF, Ortiz G, et al. Variable presentations of postpartum angiopathy. Stroke 2012;43:670e6. [21] Ursell MR, Marras CL, Farb R, et al. Recurrent intracranial hemorrhage due to postpartum cerebral angiopathy: implications for management. Stroke 1998;29:1995e8. [22] Ducros A. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:906e17. [23] Akins PT, Levy KJ, Cross AH, et al. Postpartum cerebral vasospasm treated with hypervolemic therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;33:5e7. [24] Garcia-Reitboeck P, Al-Memar A. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction after preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2013;369:e4. [25] Singhal, Aneesh B, Bernstein RA. Postpartum angiopathy and other cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes. Neurocrit Care 2005;3:91e7. *[26] Edlow JA, Caplan LR, O'Brien K, et al. Diagnosis of acute neurological emergencies in pregnant and post-partum women. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:175e85. [27] Calabrese LH, Dodick DW, Schwedt TJ, et al. Narrative Review : reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes. Ann Intern Med 2003;146:34e44. [28] Ducros A, Boukobza M, Sarov M, et al. The clinical and radiological spectrum of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. A prospective series of 67 patients. Brain 2007;130:3091e101. [29] Nowak DA, Rodiek SO, Henneken S, et al. Reversible segmental cerebral vasoconstriction ( CalleFleming syndrome ): are calcium channel inhibitors a potential treatment option? Cephalalgia 2003;23:218e22. [30] Lu S, Liao Y, Fuh J, et al. Nimodipine for treatment of primary thunderclap headache. Neurology 2013;62:1414e6. [31] Ioannidis I, Nasis N, Agianniotaki E, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome : treatment with multiple sessions of intra-arterial nimodipine and angioplasty. Interv Neuroradiol 2012;18:297e302. [32] Elstner M, Linn J, Müller-Schunk S, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a complicated clinical course treated with intra-arterial application of nimodipine. Cephalalgia 2009;29:677e82. [33] Bouchard M, Verreault S, Frcp C, et al. Intra-arterial milrinone for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Headache 2009;49:142e5. [34] Song JK, Fisher S, Seifert TDD, et al. Postpartum cerebral angiopathy : atypical features and treatment with intracranial balloon angioplasty. Neuroradiology 2004;46:1022e6. [35] Grande P-O, Lundgren A, Bjartmarz H, et al. Segmental cerebral vasoconstriction : successful treatment of secondary cerebral ischaemia with intravenous prostacyclin. Cephalalgia 2010;30:890e5. [36] Fugate JE, Claassen DO, Cloft HJ, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: associated clinical and radiologic findings. Mayo Clin Proc 2014;85:427e32. [37] Pande AR, Ando K, Ishikura R, et al. Clinicoradiological factors influencing the reversibility of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: a multicenter study. Radiat Med 2006;24:659e68. [38] Striano P, Striano S, Tortora F, et al. Clinical spectrum and critical care management of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). Med Sci Monit 2005;11:CR549e53. [39] Staykov D, Schwab S. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J Intensive Care Med 2012;27:11e24. [40] Bateman BT, Schumacher HC, Bushnell CD, et al. Intracerebral hemorrhage in pregnancy: frequency, risk factors, and outcome. Neurology 2006;67:424e9. [41] James AH, Bushnell CD, Jamison MG, et al. Incidence and risk factors for stroke in pregnancy and the puerperium. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:509e16. *[42] Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013; 44:870e947. [43] Saposnik G, Barinagarrementeria F, Brown RD, et al. Diagnosis and management of cerebral venous thrombosis: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke a J Cereb Circ 2011;42:1158e92.

Please cite this article in press as: Shainker SA, et al., Cerebrovascular emergencies in pregnancy, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.bpobgyn.2015.03.004

10

S.A. Shainker et al. / Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology xxx (2015) 1e11

[44] Lees KR, Bluhmki E, Von Kummer R, et al. Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials. Lancet 2010;375:1695e703. [45] Schumacher B, Belfort MA, Card RJ. Successful treatment of acute myocardial infarction during pregnancy with tissue plasminogen activator. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:716e9. [46] Ahearn G, Hadjiliadis D, Govert J, et al. Massive pulmonary embolism during pregnancy successfully treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator: a case report and review of treatment options. Arch Intern Med 2002;162: 1221e7. [47] Barclay GR, Allen K, Pennington CR. Tissue plasminogen activator in the treatment of superior vena caval thrombosis associated with parenteral nutrition. Postgr Med J 1990;66:398e400. [48] Dapprich M, Boessenecker W. Fibrinolysis with alteplase in a pregnant woman with stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2002;13:290. [49] Murugappan A, Coplin WM, Al-Sadat AN, et al. Thrombolytic therapy of acute ischemic stroke during pregnancy. Neurology 2006;66:768e70. [50] Leonhardt G, Gaul C, Nietsch HH, et al. Thrombolytic therapy in pregnancy. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2006;21:271e6. [51] Turan TN, Stern BJ. Stroke in pregnancy. Neurol Clin 2004;22:821e40. *[52] Adams HP, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the american heart association/american stroke association stroke council, clinical cardiology council, cardiovascular radiology and intervention council, and the athero. Stroke 2007;38:1655e711. [53] Collaboration AT. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. Br Med J 2002;324:71e86. [54] Taggart DP, Siddiqui A, Wheatley DJ. Low-dose preoperative aspirin therapy, postoperative blood loss, and transfusion requirements. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:424e8. *[55] Furie KL, Kasner SE, Adams RJ, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2011;42:227e76. [56] Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2014;45. 00e00. [57] Soriano D, Carp H, Seidman DS, et al. Management and outcome of pregnancy in women with thrombophylic disorders and past cerebrovascular events. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:204e7. [58] Coppage KH, Hinton AC, Moldenhauer J, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcome in women with a history of stroke. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:1331e4. [59] Lamy C, Hamon JB, Coste J, et al. Ischemic stroke in young women: risk of recurrence during subsequent pregnancies. French Study Group on Stroke in Pregnancy. Neurology 2000;55:269e74. [60] Helms AK, Drogan O, Kittner SJ. First trimester stroke prophylaxis in pregnant women with a history of stroke. Stroke 2009;40:1158e61. [61] Marshman LAG, Aspoas AR, Rai MS, et al. The implications of ISAT and ISUIA for the management of cerebral aneurysms during pregnancy. Neurosurg Rev 2007;30:177e80. [62] Kittner SJ, Stern BJ, Feeser BR, et al. Pregnancy and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med 1996;335:768e74. [63] Feske SK. Stroke in pregnancy. Semin Neurol 2007;27:442e52. [64] Dias M, Sekhar L. Intracranial hemorrhage from aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations during pregnancy and the puerperium. Neurosurgery 1990;27:855e65. [65] Nyquist P. Management of acute intracranial and intraventricular hemorrhage. Crit Care Med 2010;38:946e53. [66] Bateman BT, Olbrecht VA, Berman MF, et al. Peripartum subarachnoid hemorrhage: nationwide data and institutional experience. Anesthesiology 2012;116:324e33. [67] Tiel Groenestege AT, Rinkel GJ, van der Bom JG, et al. The risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage during pregnancy, delivery, and the puerperium in the Utrecht population: case-crossover study and standardized incidence ratio estimation. Stroke 2009;40:1148e51. [68] Barrett JM, Van Hooydonk JE, Boehm FH. Pregnancy-related rupture of arterial aneurysms. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1982;37: 557e66. [69] Hunt HB, Schifrin BS, Suzuki K. Ruptured berry aneurysms and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1974;43:827e37. [70] Maurice-Williams RS. Aneurysm surgery after the International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:807e8. [71] Isuia. Unruptured intracranial aneurysmserisk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1725e33. [72] Tarnaris A, Haliasos N, Watkins LD. Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms during pregnancy: Is this the best way forward? case report and review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012;114: 703e6. [73] Meyers PM, Halbach VV, Malek AM, et al. Endovascular treatment of cerebral artery aneurysms during pregnancy: report of three cases. Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1306e11. [74] Al-Shahi R, Fang JSY, Lewis SC, et al. Prevalence of adults with brain arteriovenous malformations: a community based study in Scotland using capture-recapture analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73:547e51. [75] Skidmore FM, Williams LS, Fradkin KD, et al. Presentation, etiology, and outcome of stroke in pregnancy and puerperium. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2001;10:1e10. [76] Horton JC, Chambers WA, Lyons SL, et al. Pregnancy and the risk of hemorrhage from cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 1990;27:867e71. [77] Liu X, Wang S, Zhao Y, et al. Risk of cerebral arteriovenous malformation rupture during pregnancy and puerperium. Neurol 2014;82:1798e803. [78] Gross BA, Du R. Hemorrhage from arteriovenous malformations during pregnancy. Neurosurgery 2012;71:349e55. [79] Forster DM, Kunkler IH, Hartland P. Risk of cerebral bleeding from arteriovenous malformations in pregnancy: the Sheffield experience. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1993;61(Suppl. 1):20e2.

Please cite this article in press as: Shainker SA, et al., Cerebrovascular emergencies in pregnancy, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.bpobgyn.2015.03.004

S.A. Shainker et al. / Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology xxx (2015) 1e11

11

[80] Agarwal N, Guerra JC, Gala N, et al. Current treatment options for cerebral arteriovenous malformations in pregnancy: a review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2014;81:83e90. [81] Mast H, Young WL, Koennecke HC, et al. Risk of spontaneous haemorrhage after diagnosis of cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Lancet 1997;350:1065e8. [82] Kim YW, Neal D, Hoh BL. Cerebral aneurysms in pregnancy and delivery: pregnancy and delivery do not increase the risk of aneurysm rupture. Neurosurgery 2013;72:143e9. *[83] Guyatt GH, Akl EA, Crowther M, et al. Executive summary: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2012;141:7Se47S. [84] Qaiser R, Black P. Neurosurgery in pregnancy. Semin Neurol 2007;27:476e81. [85] Cantú C, Barinagarrementeria F. Cerebral venous thrombosis associated with pregnancy and puerperium. Review of 67 cases. Stroke a J Cereb Circ 1993;24:1880e4. [86] Preter M, Tzourio C, Ameri A, et al. Long-term prognosis in cerebral venous thrombosis: follow-up of 77 patients. Stroke 1996;27:243e6. [87] Jeng J-S, Tang S-C, Yip P-K. Incidence and etiologies of stroke during pregnancy and puerperium as evidenced in Taiwanese women. Cerebrovasc Dis Basel Switz 2004;18:290e5. [88] Treadwell SD, Thanvi B, Robinson TG. Stroke in pregnancy and the puerperium. Postgrad Med J 2008;84:238e45. *[89] Sibai BM, Coppage KH. Diagnosis and management of women with stroke during pregnancy/postpartum. Clin Perinatol 2004;31:853e68.

Please cite this article in press as: Shainker SA, et al., Cerebrovascular emergencies in pregnancy, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.bpobgyn.2015.03.004

Cerebrovascular emergencies in pregnancy.

Caring for pregnant and postpartum patients with neurological disease carries specific challenges. In performing a diagnosis, it is often difficult to...
353KB Sizes 5 Downloads 10 Views