DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA Aimee K. Zaas, MD Thomas J. Marrie, MD, Section Editors

Difficult to Identify: Malignant Primary Peritoneal Mesothelioma Beth S. Zha, MD, PhD,a Margaret Flanagan, MD,b Caley Coulson, MD,a Kanishka W. Garvin, MDc,d Departments of aInternal Medicine and bPathology and cDivision of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; dDivision of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Puget Sound Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Seattle, Wash.

PRESENTATION Vague symptoms belied a 59-year-old woman’s dire situation. She presented with a 3-month history of abdominal pain, constipation, and anorexia, accompanied by a 40pound (18.1 kg) weight loss. Initially she had attempted to manage her symptoms conservatively, but worsening abdominal pain, bloating, and loss of appetite prompted her to seek medical care. The patient denied fevers, chills, nausea, vomiting, or blood in her stools. Ten years earlier she had undergone total hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy for significant endometriosis. Her medical history also included hypertension and migraines. She was a veteran and retired journalist who lived alone, had never smoked, and had not used alcohol or illicit drugs to any significant extent.

ASSESSMENT On examination, the patient appeared fatigued but was alert and conversant. She was afebrile with blood pressure of 132/78 mm Hg, a heart rate of 107 beats per minute, a respiratory rate of 16 breaths per minute, and an oxygen saturation of 98% on room air. Her mucous membranes were dry, and a cardiac examination revealed regularrhythm tachycardia without murmurs, rubs, or gallops. Her abdomen was soft with normal bowel sounds, mild tenderness to palpation in the epigastria and right upper quadrant, and a noticeable mass in the right middle quadrant. Initial laboratory results were consistent with dehydration but otherwise unremarkable. Computerized tomography (CT) Funding: None. Conflict of Interest: None. Authorship: All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript. Requests for reprints should be addressed to Beth S. Zha, MD, PhD, Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine Residency, University of Washington, Box 359892, Seattle, WA 98104. E-mail address: [email protected] 0002-9343/$ -see front matter Ó 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.021

of the abdomen demonstrated infiltrative opacities of the omentum, several liver surface implants, and a very distended gallbladder (Figure 1A). Findings were concerning for peritoneal carcinomatosis. The initial differential diagnosis included metastasis of colon or gallbladder malignancy and gastrointestinal lymphoma. An ovarian cause was unlikely, given her surgical history. Lesion distribution made an upper gastrointestinal malignancy less likely, and a normal pancreas and kidneys ruled these out as locations for primary tumors. The patient’s hospital course focused on symptom management and attempts at obtaining a tissue diagnosis. A small amount of ascites was present but was both difficult to obtain and thought to be a low-yield source for a definitive diagnosis. None of the lesions seen on the initial CT scan appeared to be safe for biopsy. Consultation with the general surgery department resulted in a recommendation against a laparoscopic approach, because the patient’s low functional status raised concerns for complications and a potential treatment delay. Colonoscopy was considered, but she could not tolerate the bowel preparation due to ileus. Putative cancer biomarkers were measured as follows: carcinoembryonic antigen, 4 ng/mL (within normal limits); carbohydrate antigen 19-9,

Difficult to Identify: Malignant Primary Peritoneal Mesothelioma.

Difficult to Identify: Malignant Primary Peritoneal Mesothelioma. - PDF Download Free
1MB Sizes 4 Downloads 9 Views