Diagnosis of Gynecologic Ultrasonography: Analysis
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 129.64.99.141 on 09/25/14 from IP address 129.64.99.141. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
THOMAS
Pelvic Masses of Specificity
L. LAWSON’
AND
bowel.
small
lesions
(2 cm or less in diameter).
This gray of
study scale
was undertaken ultrasonography
gynecologic
diagnostic
pelvic
All female patients sound for evaluation
masses for a period cases
after
with
6 month
and
and
to
determine
No mass: Normal Early intrauterine Ascites, no pelvic
its
of 18 months
a diagnosis
clinical
Serial
follow-up
were
were
(sagittal)
obtained
masses were localized
analyzed.
by surgery.
autopsy.
at
and consistency
98 (94) masses:
transverse
1 cm
intervals.
determined
Identified both
A- and B-mode ultrasonography at high and low gain (sensitivity). Masses were classified as solid, cystic, or complex using the classic ultrasonic criteria . Ultrasonography was considered correct when the pelvic mass was properly characterized and localized and the proven diagnosis suggested.
Ovarian
fibroma
Ovarian Ovarian Total
granulosa dermoid
tissue
cell tumor tumor .
Complex pelvic Abscess Ectopic
4 4 4 3
adenocarcinoma of colon
Adhesions/inflammatory Endometriosis
B-mode
utilizing
22 (20)
Extrauterine: Ovarian Carcinoma
included.
and
19
Total
or
examined, 251 were deemed proven and study (table 1 ). Ultrasound correctly identified the presence or absence of a mass as well as its consistency and location in 229 cases, for an overall accuracy rate of approximately 91%. The 22 errors were primarily the result of oveninterpretation of loops of bowel, technically poor examinations, misinterpretation of ectopic pregnancy. or small lesions at the lower limit of resolution. There were 98 patients with suspected pelvic masses on pelvic examination who were subsequently found to be without mass or with a normal intrauterine pregnancy. Of this group, 94 were correctly diagnosed by ultrasound. The
in
four
loops
errors
were
caused
by misinterpretation
November
1976;
accepted
after
Am
J Roentgenol
128:1003-1006,
June
1977
March
Roentgen University
4.
46 (40) masses:t retention
49 10 4 2 2
cyst
pregnancy
cyst
Hydrosalpinx
Total .
of bowel
revision
2 adhesions
Endometrial
rectly
67 (59)
Numbers in determined
TAll
3,
2 tumor
Abscess Ectopic
18(16)
2
Total Cystic pelvic Functional
su9gested
Presented at the annual meeting of the American 1 Department of Radiology. George Washington
Brenner
Endometriosis Small bowel
as masses.
Received
carcinoma:
Malignant
this
.
9 5
Adenocarcinoma Cystadenocarcinoma
Of the patients
included
.
24
pregnancy
Ovarian
.
masses:t
Dermoid
Results
parentheses existence.
the correct
represent total for which ultrasonography size. location. and consistency of the mass
diagnosis
extrauterine
1977.
Ray Society. Medical
Center.
1003
Washington. Washington.
Cases
57 40
pregnancy tumor
Leiomyomas Sarcoma, mixed mesodermal Endometrial carcinoma Retained products of conception
ultrapelvic
were obtained with a full urinary available gray scale ultrasono-
longitudinal
ultrasonograms
were retrospectively
confirmed
No
Total
Methods of diagnostic or palpable
1
Diagnosis in Patients with Suspected Pelvic Masses
Type Mass and Diagnosis
Solid pelvic Uterine:
referred to the section of clinically suspected
All pelvic ultrasonograms bladder using a commercially
scope.
only made
specificity. Materials
Only
TABLE
or poor
are nonspecific. diagnosis be
40 solid pelvic masses: 22 uterine Solid extrauterine masses could not from the uterus ultrasonically in
Proven Clinically
to evaluate the accuracy of in the detection and diagnosis masses
N. ALBARELLI’
The series included and 18 extrauterine. be cleanly separated
A retrospective analysis of 251 proven cases of gynecologic masses was undertaken. Accuracy of gray scale sonography in determining the existence. size. location. and consistency of pelvic masses was approximately 91%. This is slightly higher than previously reported and could reflect increased accuracy of gray scale ultrasonography. Errors were primarily due to misinterpretation of loops of technique. Since ultrasonograms rarely could a specific histologic without accurate clinical information.
JUDITH
by Gray Scale and Accuracy
D.C., D.C
September 20037.
1976 Address
reprint
requests
to
T. L. Lawson
corand
LAWSON
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 129.64.99.141 on 09/25/14 from IP address 129.64.99.141. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
1004
three
of four
noma with
of the colon, inflammatory
cases
of endometniosis. Among the sound
tumors,
Small
adhesions
one
ovarian
of one
tumors,
was
extrauterine and
carcinoma
cases and
were
was (fig.
were
were
two
an
adnexal
interpreted 1 ). Of the
ultrasound
interpreted
carcinoma
ultra-
sonolucent, as
sarcoma Ieiomyoma
canci-
two
relatively
misinterpreted
there
and
missed
as solid
errors.
as a pelvic
was
ALBARELLI
pelvic adhesions of three cases
there
pedunculated,
and the uterine a calcified uterine bowel
ovarian
uterine
One
Ieiomyoma
abscess, simply
both all four disease,
solid
errors.
uterine
of
AND
for
mass,
technical
reasons. All were
46
complex
the
most
pelvic
masses
inflammatory
postoperative disease. separated cases ovarian
and
Of the complex ultrasonically
pelvic from
In one
adhesions
were
other
cases,
cystic
denmoid
the
exceptions
two
secondary
loops
cystic tumor
were of
not
cysts
not
be nine
as
ovarian were
bound an
the
adnexal
carcinomas
and
by
mass.
and
misinterpreted
ovary;
by ultratogether
In
a bilateral
erroneously
Two patients with as having functional
ectopic
pregnancy
was
considered. In general,
tenistics to
of
four
Cnohn’s
misdiagnosed
bowel
diagnosed as simple ovarian cysts. ectopic pregnancy were interpreted retention
were to
masses, 37% could the uterus, including
misinterpreted
two
to gonococcal
five ectopic pregnancies, three one case of pelvic endometniosis.
masses
case,
Abscesses
secondary
disease;
abscesses
Six of the complex
extrauterine.
usually
of pelvic abscesses, carcinomas, and
sound.
were
common,
noted
definite
be observed
a specific that
solid
complex
histologic masses
distinguishing
ultrasonic
charac-
in the
solid
or complex
masses
diagnosis.
However,
with
a prominent
focal
wheel, tumor
it was area
of
tissue
diagnosed surgery were
no
could
allow
Fig. 2.-Longitudinal ultrasonogram 3 cm right of midline and lateral to uterus and bladder in patient with proven cystic right ovarian dermoid tumor. Note focal area of solid tissue (arrow) within complex mass. Pattern also seen in patients with ectopic pregnancy. Although not specific. this diagnostic sign may be helpful. U level of umbilicus.
ovarian
surrounded as
(fig.
cystic
by
but
with
prominent
which may be a clue (fig. 3). Ascites was adenocarcinoma
cystadenocarcinoma
a cystic
denmoid tumors or 2). The two mucinous
area
frequently
septations, to the present but
on malignant
were
ectopic pregnancy cystadenocarcinomas like
spokes
correct diagnosis in four of six not
in
Brenner
the tumor
at of a
of this cases of cases (fig.
of 4).
ACCURACY
OF ULTRASOUND
IN PELVIC
1005
MASSES
P Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 129.64.99.141 on 09/25/14 from IP address 129.64.99.141. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
.r
I
1
Q Fig. 3. - Midline longitudinal ultrasonogram of lower abdomen and pelvis in patient with ovarian cystadenocarcinoma. Note large complex pelvic mass with central area of solid tissue and prominent septations suggesting spokes of wheel (arrows).
All 73%
67
cystic
were
masses
simple
were
extrauterine.
functional
ovarian
Fig.
4. -Transverse
1
ultrasonogram
-
through
pelvis
demonstrating
uterus (u) in center of loculated area of malignant ascitic fluid. seen as anechoic region Note multiple solid masses along periphery of pelvic wall reflecting areas of tumor metastases and tethered loops of bowel (arrows)
Approximately retention
cysts.
Pelvic abscesses accounted for 20% of cystic masses: three occurred postoperatively, one secondary to appendicitis, one secondary to Crohn’s disease involving the terminal ileum, and one was a tuberculosis salpingitis. Eight diagnostic errors were pelvic masses. Two functional preted
as ectopic
made in interpreting retention cysts were
pregnancies,
two
ectopic
cystic inter-
pregnancies
were erroneously diagnosed as simple cysts, and four small cystic ovarian masses 1 cm in diameter were interpreted as small solid lesions. All lesions in this group, except two ectopic pregnancies. were easily separated from the uterus. Of the 13 patients with proven ectopic pregnancies, ultrasound suggested the correct diagnosis in nine. Analysis of the proven cases of ectopic pregnancy demonstrated the uterus to be either of normal size or slightly enlarged with an extrauterine mass present in all cases. The mass was complex in nine cases and cystic in four. In five cases of complex masses and two of cystic masses, the
mass
was
adjacent
to
the
uterus
but
could
not
be
distinctly separated from it (fig. 5). In the other four complex and two cystic masses, the mass could easily be separated from the uterus. The masses were located posteniorly in the cul-de-sac in three cases, in a lateral adnexal location in eight, above the uterine fundus in one case, and in a combined cul-de-sac and adnexal position in one. In only two of 13 cases was what was interpreted to be the gestational sac seen (fig. 6). Discussion Diagnostic mining
the
ultrasound existence,
is an accurate size,
location,
method and
of deter-
consistency
of
Fig. 5. -Transverse pelvic ultrasonogram 4 cm above pubic symphysis and above urinary bladder in patient with ectopic pregnancy. Scan demonstrates slightly enlarged uterus (ul and complex left adnexal mass (arrows) with focal area of echogenic solid tissue. Mass is adjacent to uterus but inseparable from it; no gestational sac seen. This complex of abnormalities
was
most
common
finding
in ectopic
pregnancies.
pelvic masses. Previous reports demonstrated an accuracy of 82% in diagnosis of pelvic masses 11-31. Overall accuracy in this study was approximately 91%. This slight improvement
may
of gray
ultrasonography.
scale
Ultrasound
nosis
can
be a reflection
is nonspecific,
be given
according
of the and
only
to clinical
improved a differential
history,
technique diag-
location,
LAWSON
1006
AND
cysts, including follicular and lutein cysts, were the most common. A significant number of pelvic abscesses and a few cases of ectopic pregnancy and endometnial cysts were also found to be cystic, mimicking the ultrasonic findings of a simple ovarian cyst. A correct ultrasound diagnosis was made in nine of 13 patients (69%) with proven ectopic pregnancy. This is approximately the same accuracy as previously reported
‘S Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 129.64.99.141 on 09/25/14 from IP address 129.64.99.141. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
ALBARELLI
[4].
I S
kt
I
b’
S
False
internal
Fig.
6.
-
Midline
longitudinal
ultrasonogram
demonstrating
uterus (u) behind bladder (b) in patient with ectopic pregnancy. Complex mass is adjacent to fundus of uterus (arrows). Note small cystic area with appearance of gestational sac. S = level of pubic symphysis.
and consistency of the mass in question. Solid uterine masses are most likely to be uterine Ieiomyomas. However, the possibility of a malignant uterine tumor cannot be excluded by ultrasound alone. Our case of a rare uterine sarcoma of the mixed mesodermal type with osseous cornponents. which mimicked a calcified leiomyoma on both and
radiographs,
or colon
and
could
not
masses,
endometniosis
a carcinoma
were
the
most
of the common
lesions. These lesions may be bound to the uterus by adhesions or in close proximity so they cannot be separated from the uterus by ultrasound, and a specific diagnosis cannot be made. However, if an irregular extrauterine pelvic mass is identified with ascites present. a diagnosis of ovarian adenocancinoma is suggested. The malignant ascites noted in these patients had the characteristic pattern
of
tethered
The ectopic ultrasonic
being loops
relatively of bowel
loculated fixed
with
along
the
nodular lateral
masses pelvic
approximately
3.5%,
a
echoes
[4]
was
not
commonly
seen
most
commonly
observed
our
series
of
pregnancy
was
to, but inseparable
from,
ectopic
enlarged
uterus,
within
with
or outside
no
the
triad
of
gestational
uterus.
in this
study.
abnormalities
a complex
a normal sac
A good
in
adnexal
or slightly
identified
clinical
either
history
with
ectopic pregnancy suspected was the single most important factor in making a correct diagnosis. Ultrasound errors were made in several cases when loops of bowel or adhesions were misinterpreted and overzealously diagnosed as a pelvic mass. Care should be taken when analyzing these vague, nonspecific “masses”; a mass should not be diagnosed if it is not easily reproducible.
If in doubt,
repeat
or follow-up
sonography
should
were
noted
which
would
diagnosis
was
when
Ultrasound
masses
were
cm or greater
cystic
masses
are
ameter
of the
2-3 less
beam
than
easier
and
2 cm,
width,
and
they
cannot
more
accurate
in diameter.
When
approach
the
di-
be discriminated
from surrounding tissues. Many of these masses are misinterpreted as solid because artifactual echoes and diffuse
nelfections small cysts.
are
recorded
or
as
arising
from
inside
these
REFERENCES
walls.
most common complex mass was pelvic abscess; pregnancy was the next most common. No specific characteristics
was
be performed.
be diagnosed preoperatively. Of the solid extrauterine ovary
probably
diagnosis
The
mass adjacent
slightly
enlarged
ultrasound
positive
marked improvement from earlier reports. Criteria for diagnosis in our study was a strong clinical suspicion, a pelvic mass, and a normal or slightly enlarged uterus, without an intrauterine gestational sac. The previously reported sign of uterine enlargement with prominent
allow
a histologic diagnosis, although cystadenocancinomas were found to have prominent septations like spokes of a wheel, while complex masses with a focal solid area surrounded by a cystic zone were usually dermoid tumors on ectopic pregnancy. Of the purely cystic pelvic masses, functional retention
1 . Cochrane
WJ,
Thomas
MA:
Ultrasound
diagnosis
of
gyne-
Radiology 1 10:649-654, 1974 2. Cochrane WJ: Ultrasound in gynecology. Radiol Clin North Am 13:457-466, 1975 3. Levi 5, Delval R: Value of ultrasonic diagnosis of gynecologic tumors in 370 surgical cases. Obstet Gynecol Scand 55: cologic
pelvic
261-266.
4. Kobayashi the
diagnosis
1131-1140.
masses.
1976
M. Hellman of ectopic 1969
LM,
Fillisti
pregnancy.
LP: Am
Ultrasound, J Obst
an aid in 103:
Gynecol