Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 13: 880–883

DOI: 10.1111/jth.12883


Diagnosis and treatment of incidental venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH M. DI NISIO,*† A. Y. Y. LEE,‡ M. CARRIER,§ H. A. LIEBMAN¶ and A. A. KHORANA,** FOR THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON HAEMOSTASIS AND MALIGNANCY *Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University ‘G. D’Annunzio’ of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy; †Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; ‡Department of Medicine, Thrombosis Program, University of British Columbia and Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, Vancouver, BC; §Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; ¶Jane Anne Nohl Division of Hematology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; and **Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA

To cite this article: Di Nisio M, Lee AYY, Carrier M, Liebman HA, Khorana AA, for the Subcommittee on Haemostasis and Malignancy. Diagnosis and treatment of incidental venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13: 880–3.

Scope and methodology Modern computed tomography (CT), with its high sensitivity and resolution, has increased the detection of incidental venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the venous and pulmonary vasculature during routine imaging for cancer staging and response assessment [1]. As a result, up to half of all VTEs diagnosed in oncology centers are incidental [1–5]. Although widely accepted, the diagnosis of incidental VTE is made without using the standard imaging studies required for confirming the presence of symptomatic VTE (i.e. compression ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis [DVT], and CT pulmonary angiography [CTPA] or ventilation/perfusion lung scan for pulmonary embolism [PE]). The accuracy and reliability of staging imaging in making a diagnosis of DVT or PE have not been established. In addition, the appropriate treatment of incidental VTE has been poorly studied. International clinical practice guidelines suggest or recommend standard anticoagulation as for symptomatic VTE [6–8]. However, these recommendations are extrapolated from studies in symptomatic VTE, and may not apply to all cases of incidental VTE, because of the uncertainty regarding the age of the clots (which may vary from days to months), the clinical Correspondence: Marcello Di Nisio, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University ‘G. D’Annunzio’, via dei Vestini, 31, Chieti, Italy. Tel.: +39 0871 358255; fax: +39 0871 358514. E-mail: [email protected] Received 17 December 2014 Manuscript handled by: M. Levi Final decision: F. R. Rosendaal, 19 February 2015

significance of isolated peripheral clots, such as isolated subsegmental PE (SSPE), and the fact that the risk/benefit ratio for anticoagulation may differ from that for incidental vs. symptomatic VTE. This guidance statement will provide clinicians with practical advice on the diagnosis and management of incidental VTE in cancer patients. As previously defined, ‘recommend’ indicates a strong guidance statement with good consensus among the panelists, whereby the clinician should consider adopting the practice in most cases, whereas ‘suggest’ reflects a weak guidance statement with moderate consensus among the panel members, whereby the clinician may adopt the guidance statement or use an alternative approach to manage patients [9]. Diagnosing incidental VTE Incidental vs. symptomatic VTE

Incidental VTE refers to DVT or PE that is clinically unsuspected at the time of the diagnosis [10]. Although incidental PE may be asymptomatic, as many as two-thirds of affected patients report having symptoms consistent with PE, such as fatigue or shortness of breath [11]. However, these non-specific symptoms are often attributed to the cancer or side effects of treatment. Consequently, clinicians should carefully review the clinical presentation to determine whether a patient with an incidental VTE has had symptoms consistent with DVT or PE. Accuracy of staging imaging for diagnosis of VTE

The accuracy of contrast studies used for cancer staging in diagnosing PE or DVT has not been formally evaluated. Although CT of the chest has a high sensitivity for © 2015 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Management of incidental VTE in cancer patients 881

proximal PE that may approach that of CTPA [12], the main concern is the false-positive rate when peripheral PE or SSPE is incidentally detected. Performing confirmatory testing such as CTPA is often not practical or feasible, because it exposes the patient to additional radiation and contrast, and increases healthcare costs. More recently, the interobserver agreement for isolated SSPE in CTPA has been questioned. In a retrospective single-center study, CTPA images of 70 cases (45% with cancer) diagnosed with symptomatic SSPE underwent a second review by an experienced chest radiologist [13]. In only 51% of cases did the reviewing radiologist agree with the initial diagnosis; 11% were judged to be false positives. Performing lower limb ultrasonography has been suggested in patients with incidental isolated SSPE, as the presence of concomitant DVT would provide support for the incidental SSPE being probably clinically relevant [14,15]. Similarly, compression ultrasonography is advocated for confirming the presence of incidental ileofemoral DVT, because filling defect artefacts may be caused by the low flow state of contrast in the pelvic region. Imaging the lower limbs may also detect silent DVT involving the femoral and popliteal veins. CT and magnetic resonance have better accuracy than ultrasonography, and are the imaging methods of choice for the diagnosis of splanchnic DVT [16,17]. Guidance statement 1 In cancer patients with a diagnosis of incidental VTE, we recommend a careful review of the history to exclude symptomatic VTE. 2 In patients with incidental PE involving the main, lobar, segmental or multiple subsegmental pulmonary arteries, we suggest that no further testing is required to confirm the diagnosis. 3 In patients with isolated SSPE, we recommend careful review of the images by radiologists, and suggest that compression ultrasonography of the lower limbs be performed to detect concomitant incidental DVT. 4 In patients with incidental ileofemoral DVT on CT of the abdomen and pelvis, we suggest confirming the diagnosis with Doppler ultrasonography of the pelvis and compression ultrasonography of the lower limbs. Treatment of incidental VTE Although the evidence is largely based on observational and retrospective data, incidental VTE seems to carry a similarly poor prognosis in terms of recurrent VTE, bleeding and mortality as symptomatic VTE [3,4,18–22]. Furthermore, autopsy studies have suggested that incidental PE represents a frequently unrecognized cause of death in cancer patients [23]. Consequently, anticoagulant therapy is recommended for incidental VTE by major clinical practice guidelines [7]. However, given the associated increased risk of bleeding, potential interference with anti© 2015 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

neoplastic treatments, impact on patient quality of life, and added cost, the decision to initiate anticoagulant therapy should be made with due consideration of these consequences and with the informed consent of the patient. Anticoagulation for incidental distal thrombi or emboli such as isolated SSPE, although they represents a small minority of incidental VTEs, is particularly controversial [13–15]. Case–control and observational studies in patients with incidental isolated SSPE have reported uneventful follow-up and similar survival as in patients without PE among those who were not treated with anticoagulation, whereas major bleeding occurred in as many as 5% of those treated [19,24]. These findings suggest that routine anticoagulation may unnecessarily expose some patients to the risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding without meaningful benefit. However, a recent meta-analysis demonstrated that the risk of recurrent symptomatic VTE in patients with SSPE is comparable to that in those with more proximal PE, and suggested that untreated SSPE has a high risk of recurrence [22]. There are no studies that have specifically evaluated the management of incidental distal DVT. As for symptomatic cases, the approach could range from anticoagulation in all patients to serial ultrasonography to detect and treat those extending to the proximal veins [25]. Splanchnic DVT constitutes a significant proportion of incidental VTE [16,17]. However, very little is known about the natural history or need for anticoagulation of such thrombi. In cohort studies, approximately one-half are untreated by physicians [17]. Some clinicians favor a prompt start of anticoagulation in all of these patients [7,16,26], whereas others consider treatment on a case-bycase basis, targeting only those with acute symptoms or additional high-risk features [6]. A suggested approach to managing cancer patients with incidental VTE, based on currently available evidence, is outlined in Fig. 1. Anticoagulant options

Extrapolating from symptomatic cancer-associated VTE, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is preferred, and can be given at full therapeutic doses for the first month, with tapering to 75% of the full dose thereafter [27]. Warfarin is an option if LMWH is not available or acceptable to patients, or in patients without active cancer. In the absence of cancer-specific studies, newer oral anticoagulants cannot be currently recommended [28]. Filter insertion should be avoided, especially in patients who are asymptomatic and do not have any contraindications for anticoagulation. Duration of anticoagulation

The optimal duration of therapy has not been studied in cancer patients with thrombosis. The published literature

882 M. Di Nisio et al Incidental VTE reported Yes Symptoms compatible with VTE? No

Treat as symptomatic VTE

Location of incidental VTE?

Proximal DVT, segmental or more proximal PE, multiple SSPE

Isolated SSPE US of lower limbs DVT

thrombosis that appears to be acute, or that shows progression or extension over time, and in those who are neither actively bleeding nor have a very high risk of bleeding. 6 In cancer patients with evidence of disease or ongoing systemic or locoregional therapy, we suggest periodic reevaluation of the risks of bleeding and VTE recurrence, as well as patient preferences, to guide the decision of whether to extend LMWH beyond 6 months.




Case-by-case anticoagulation or serial US and clinical monitoring

Fig. 1. Suggested approach to managing cancer patients with incidental VTE. DVT, deep vein thrombosis; PE, pulmonary embolism; SSPE, subsegmental pulmonary embolism; US, ultrasonography; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

M. Di Nisio, A. Y. Y. Lee, and A. A. Khorana were responsible for concept and design. M. Di Nisio, A. Y. Y. Lee, M. Carrier, H. A. Liebman, and A. A. Khorana were responsible for interpretation of data, critical writing or revision of the intellectual content, and final approval of the version to be published. Disclosure of Conflict of Interests

suggests that cancer patients with incidental VTE should receive relatively short courses of anticoagulation, i.e. for 3–6 months, and that considerable variation exists for both duration and dosing regimens [20]. In particular, for cases of single-segment PE and SSPE, international surveys have revealeded that physicians often choose to not treat or to use subtherapeutic or prophylactic doses of LMWH for short periods [29,30]. In cancer patients with incidental distal DVT or isolated SSPE without DVT, a shorter duration of anticoagulation – if the decision has been made to treat – to minimize exposure to anticoagulant therapy seems reasonable.

M. Di Nisio reports providing consultation to Bayer Health Care. A. Y. Y. Lee reports providing consultation to or receiving honoraria from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringher Ingelheim, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, and Sanofi Aventis. M. Carrier reports receiving grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and LEO Pharma, and personal fees from Pfizer, Bayer, and LEO Pharma. H. A. Liebman reports receiving personal fees from Janssen and Portola. A. A. Khorana reports receiving personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Leo Pharma, Roche, Janssen, and Daiichi Sankyo.

Guidance statement


1 In cancer patients with incidental VTE, we recommend standard anticoagulation with LMWH in those with symptoms compatible with VTE. 2 In patients with incidental proximal DVT, or PE of the main, lobar, segmental or multiple subsegmental pulmonary arteries, we recommend therapeutic anticoagulation for at least 6 months. 3 In patients with isolated SSPE with proximal DVT, we recommend therapeutic anticoagulation for at least 6 months. 4 In patients with isolated SSPE with distal DVT or without DVT, we suggest that the decision to provide anticoagulation be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the risk of bleeding, the presence of risk factors for recurrent thrombosis, the performance status of the patient, and patient preference. If the decision is not to anticoagulate, we suggest clinical monitoring and serial bilateral compression ultrasonography after 1 week in those with distal DVT, to detect thrombus extension. 5 In patients with incidental splanchnic vein thrombosis, we suggest anticoagulant therapy in patients with

1 van Es N, Bleker SM, Di Nisio M. Cancer-associated unsuspected pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res 2014; 133(Suppl.): S172–8. 2 Font C, Farr us B, Vidal L, Caralt TM, Visa L, Mellado B, Tassies D, Monteagudo J, Reverter JC, Gascon P. Incidental versus symptomatic venous thrombosis in cancer: a prospective observational study of 340 consecutive patients. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 2101–6. 3 Sun J-M, Kim TS, Lee J, Park YH, Ahn JS, Kim H, Kwon OJ, Lee KS, Park K, Ahn MJ. Unsuspected pulmonary emboli in lung cancer patients: the impact on survival and the significance of anticoagulation therapy. Lung Cancer 2010; 69: 330–6. 4 Shinagare AB, Guo M, Hatabu H, Krajewski KM, Andriole K, van den Abbeele AD, Di Piro PJ, Nishino M. Incidence of pulmonary embolism in oncologic outpatients at a tertiary cancer center. Cancer 2011; 117: 3860–6. 5 Bach AG, Schmoll H-J, Beckel C, Behrmann C, Spielmann RP, Wienke A, Abbas J, Surov A. Pulmonary embolism in oncologic patients: frequency and embolus burden of symptomatic and unsuspected events. Acta Radiol 2014; 55: 45–53. 6 Lyman GH, Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, Lee AY, Arcelus JI, Balaban EP, Clarke JM, Flowers CR, Francis CW, Gates LE, Kakkar AK, Key NS, Levine MN, Liebman HA, Tempero MA, Wong SL, Prestrud AA, Falanga A. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 2189–204. © 2015 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Management of incidental VTE in cancer patients 883 7 Kearon C, Akl E, Comerota AJ, Prandoni P, Bounameaux H, Goldhaber SZ, Nelson ME, Wells PS, Gould MK, Dentali F, Crowther M, Kahn SR, American College of Chest Physicians. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141: e419S–94S. 8 Farge D, Debourdeau P, Beckers M, Baglin C, Bauersachs RM, Brenner B, Brilhante D, Falanga A, Gerotzafias GT, Haim N, Kakkar AK, Khorana AA, Lecumberri R, Mandala M, Marty M, Monreal M, Mousa SA, Noble S, Pabinger I, Prandoni P, et al. International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11: 56–70. 9 Di Nisio M, Carrier M, Lyman GH, Khorana AA. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical cancer patients. J Thromb Haemost 2014; 12: 1746–9. 10 Khorana AA, O’Connell C, Agnelli G, Liebman HA, Lee AYY, on Behalf of the Subcommittee on Hemostasis and Malignancy of the SSC of the ISTH. Incidental venous thromboembolism in oncology patients. J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10: 2602–4. 11 O’Connell CL, Boswell WD, Duddalwar V, Caton A, Mark LS, Vigen C, Liebman HA. Unsuspected pulmonary emboli in cancer patients: clinical correlates and relevance. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4928–32. 12 Browne AM, Cronin CG, English C, NiMhuircheartaigh J, Murphy JM, Bruzzi JF. Unsuspected pulmonary emboli in oncology patients undergoing routine computed tomography imaging. J Thorac Oncol 2010; 5: 798–803. 13 Pena E, Kimpton M, Dennie C, Peterson R, Le Gal G, Carrier M. Difference in interpretation of computed tomography pulmonary angiography diagnosis of subsegmental thrombosis in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10: 496–8. 14 Carrier M, Righini M, Wells PS, Perrier A, Anderson DR, Rodger MA, Pleasance S, Le Gal G. Subsegmental pulmonary embolism diagnosed by computed tomography: incidence and clinical implications. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the management outcome studies. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 1716–22. 15 Carrier M, Righini M, Le Gal G. Symptomatic subsegmental pulmonary embolism: what is the next step? J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10: 1486–90. 16 Ageno W, Dentali F, Squizzato A. How I treat splanchnic vein thrombosis. Blood 2014; 124: 3685–91. 17 Ageno W, Riva N, Schulman S, Bang SM, Sartori MT, Grandone E, Beyer-Westendorf J, Barillari G, Di Minno MND, Dentali F, on behalf of the IRSVT study group. Antithrombotic treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis: results of an international registry. Semin Thromb Hemost 2014; 40: 99–105. 18 Gosselin MV, Rubin GD, Leung AN, Huang J, Rizk NW. Unsuspected pulmonary embolism: prospective detection on routine helical CT scans. Radiology 1998; 208: 209–15.

© 2015 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

19 O’Connell C, Razavi P, Ghalichi M, Boyle S, Vasan S, Mark L, Caton A, Duddalwar V, Boswell W, Grabow K, Liebman HA. Unsuspected pulmonary emboli adversely impact survival in patients with cancer undergoing routine staging multi-row detector computed tomography scanning. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 9: 305–11. 20 den Exter PL, Hooijer J, Dekkers OM, Huisman MV. Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism and mortality in patients with cancer incidentally diagnosed with pulmonary embolism: a comparison with symptomatic patients. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 2405–9. 21 Menapace L, Peterson DR, Berry A, Sousou T, Khorana AA. Symptomatic and incidental thromboembolism are both associated with mortality in pancreatic cancer. Thromb Haemost 2011; 106: 371–8. 22 van der Hulle T, den Exter PL, Planquette B, Meyer G, Soler S, Monreal M, Jimenez D, Portillo AK, O’Connell C, Liebman H, Shteinberg M, Adir Y, Tiseo M, Bersanelli M, Abdel-Razeq HN, Mansour AH, Donnelly OG, Radhakrishna G, Ramasamy S, Bozas G, et al. Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major haemorrhage in cancer-associated incidental pulmonary embolism amongst treated and untreated patients: a pooled analysis of 926 patients. Blood 2014; ASH Meeting, San Francisco December 6–9; Oral presentation: 590. 23 Pineda LA, Hathwar VS, Grant BJ. Clinical suspicion of fatal pulmonary embolism. Chest 2001; 120: 791–5. 24 Donato A, Khoche S, Santora J, Wagner B. Clinical outcomes in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli diagnosed by multidetector CT pulmonary angiography. Thromb Res 2010; 126: e266–70. 25 Palareti G, Cosmi B, Lessiani G, Rodorigo G, Guazzaloca G, Brusi C, Valdre L, Conti E, Sartori M, Legnani C. Evolution of untreated calf deep-vein thrombosis in high risk symptomatic outpatients: the blind, prospective CALTHRO study. Thromb Haemost 2010; 104: 1063–70. 26 DeLeve LD, Valla DC, Garcia-Tsao G. Vascular disorders of the liver. Hepatology 2009; 49: 1729–64. 27 Carrier M, Khorana AA, Zwicker J, Noble S, Lee AY, Subcommittee on Haemostasis Malignancy for the SSC of the ISTH. Management of challenging cases of patients with cancer-associated thrombosis including recurrent thrombosis and bleeding: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11: 1760–5. 28 Lee AYY, Carrier M. Treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis: perspectives on the use of novel oral anticoagulants. Thromb Res 2014; 133: S167–71. 29 den Exter PL, van Roosmalen MJG, van den Hoven P, Klok FA, Monreal M, Jimenez D, Huisman MV. Physicians management approach to an incidental pulmonary embolism: an international survey. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11: 208–13. 30 Pesavento R, Filippi L, Milan M, Prandoni P. An international survey on isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res 2013; 131: 183–4.

Copyright of Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

Diagnosis and treatment of incidental venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH.

Diagnosis and treatment of incidental venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. - PDF Download Free
148KB Sizes 0 Downloads 4 Views